(Ebooks PDF) Download Effective Group Discussion Theory and Practice International Student Edition Gloria J. Galanes Full Chapters
(Ebooks PDF) Download Effective Group Discussion Theory and Practice International Student Edition Gloria J. Galanes Full Chapters
https://ebookfinal.com/download/dynamic-group-piano-teaching-
transforming-group-theory-into-teaching-practice-1st-edition-pamela-d-
pike/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/student-development-in-college-theory-
research-and-practice-lori-d-patton/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/financial-derivatives-in-theory-and-
practice-p-j-hunt/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/applied-geomorphology-theory-and-
practice-1st-edition-robert-j-allison/
ebookfinal.com
Theory and Practice of International Mediation Selected
Essays 1st Edition Jacob Bercovitch
https://ebookfinal.com/download/theory-and-practice-of-international-
mediation-selected-essays-1st-edition-jacob-bercovitch/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/group-theory-for-the-standard-model-
of-particle-physics-and-beyond-1st-edition-ken-j-barnes/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/focus-group-practice-1st-edition-
claudia-puchta/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-integrated-behavioral-health-
continuum-theory-and-practice-1st-edition-laurel-j/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/women-in-public-administration-theory-
and-practice-1st-edition-maria-j-dagostino/
ebookfinal.com
Effective Group Discussion Theory and Practice
International Student Edition Gloria J. Galanes Digital
Instant Download
Author(s): Gloria J. Galanes, Katherine L. Adams, Stephen A. Spates, Stephen
A. Spates
ISBN(s): 9781266226373, 1266226370
Edition: 16
File Details: PDF, 16.24 MB
Year: 2024
Language: english
EFFECTIVE
GROUP
DISCUSSION
Theory and Practice
SIXTEENTH EDITION
EFFECTIVE
GROUP
DISCUSSION
Theory and Practice
GLORIA J. GALANES
Missouri State University
KATHERINE L. ADAMS
California State University, Fresno
CARRISA S. HOELSCHER
Missouri State University
STEPHEN A. SPATES
Missouri State University
Final PDF to printer
Published by McGraw Hill LLC, 1325 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019. Copyright ©2024 by
McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may
be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without
the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC, including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic
storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the
United States.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LCR 28 27 26 25 24 23
ISBN 978-1-266-22637-3
MHID 1-266-22637-0
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page.
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website does
not indicate an endorsement by the authors or McGraw Hill LLC, and McGraw Hill LLC does not guarantee the
accuracy of the information presented at these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
Preface xiii
Fisher’s Model of Group Phases 242 Step 1 of P-MOPS: Problem Description and
Orientation 242 Analysis 267
Conflict 242 Identify Problems to Work On 267
Decision Emergence 242 Focus on the Problem 268
Reinforcement 243 State the Problem Appropriately 268
Promoting Critical Thinking 245 Map the Problem 269
Evaluating Information 245 Step 2 of P-MOPS: Generating and Elaborating on
Distinguishing Between Facts and Inferences 246 Possible Solutions 269
Evaluating Survey and Statistical Data 246 Using Brainstorming to Discover Alternatives 270
Evaluating the Sources and Implications of Step 3 of P-MOPS: Evaluating Possible Solutions 272
Opinions 246 Establish a Collaborative Climate for Evaluation 272
Evaluating Reasoning 248 Establish Norms That Promote Critical Thinking 272
Overgeneralizing 248 Step 4 of P-MOPS: Consensus Decision Making 275
Ad Hominem Attacks 248 Suggestions for Achieving Consensus 275
Suggesting Inappropriate Causal Relationships 248 Second-Guess the Tentative Choice Before Fully
False Dilemmas 249 Committing to It 276
Faulty Analogies 249 Step 5 of P-MOPS: Implementing the
Evaluating Information and Reasoning from Internet Solution Chosen 277
Sources 250 Use PERT to Keep Track of Implementation
Accuracy 250 Details 277
Authority 250 Tailoring P-MOPS to Fit a Specific Problem 280
Audience 250 Problem Characteristics 280
Purpose 250 Using Technology to Help a Group’s Problem
Recency 251 Solving and Decision Making 281
Coverage 251 General Tools 285
Understanding What Can Go Wrong During Technology Designed for Group Problem Solving 287
Decision Making 252 Questions for Review 291
Hidden Profiles 252
Key Terms 291
Group Polarization 253
Groupthink 254 Notes 291
Questions for Review 256
Key Terms 257 11 Managing Conflict in the
Notes 257 Small Group 295
A Definition of Conflict 297
10 Problem Solving and Decision Positive and Negative Outcomes of Conflict 299
Making in Groups: Benefits of Conflict 299
Negative Effects of Conflict 300
Practical Tips and Techniques 263
Expressing Disagreement in a Group 300
Using Problem-Solving Guidelines 264 Types of Conflict 303
The Procedural Model of Problem Solving Conflict Types and Computer-Mediated Communication
(P-MOPS) 266 (CMC) 306
The Single Question Format 266 Managing Group Conflict 307
The Ideal Solution Format 266 Conflict Management Styles and Tactics 307
Using P-MOPS to Address Complex Avoidance 308
Problems 267 Accommodation 309
Contents xi
Competition 310
Collaboration 310
Appendix A: Preparing for
Compromise 311 Problem-Solving Discussions:
Working with Conflict Management Styles in Informational Resources for the
Groups 312 Group 361
Expressing Disagreement Ethically 313
Cultural Factors in Conflict 315
Review and Organize Your Present Stock
Negotiating Principled Agreement 317 of Information and Ideas 361
When Negotiation Fails: Alternative Procedures 319 Gather Information You Need 363
Mediation by the Leader 319 Note Taking 363
Voting 320 Reading: Print and Electronic Sources 364
Forcing 320 Direct Observation 365
Third-Party Arbitration 320 Surveys 366
Questions for Review 322 Individual and Group Interviews 366
Focus Group Interviews 367
Key Terms 322 Other Information Sources 367
Notes 322 Evaluate the Information and Ideas
You Have Collected 368
PART V Organize Your Information and
Ideas 368
Group Observation and
Key Terms 369
Evaluation Tools 327
Notes 369
12 Tools for Assessing and
Evaluating Groups 329
Internal Assessment: Members Evaluate the
Appendix B: Making Public
Presentations of the Group’s
Group 332
Self-Assessment 332
Output 371
Member and Group Assessment 337 The Planning Stage 371
Calling for Outside Help: The Consultant 343 Your Audience 371
Practice First 344 Your Occasion 372
Reminding 344 Your Purpose 372
Teaching 344 Your Subject or Topic 372
Critiquing 345 Member Strengths and Fears 373
Giving Feedback 345 Logistics 373
Planning the Consultation 346 Types of Group Oral Presentations 373
Ethical Principles for Consultants 348 Panel Discussion 374
More Instruments for Observing and Preparing for Panel Discussions 374
Consulting 349 Symposium 375
Verbal Interaction Analysis 349 Forum Discussions 375
Content Analysis 349 The Organizing Stage 376
SYMLOG: Drawing a Snapshot of a Group 354 Delegate Duties 377
Questions for Review 358 Gather Verbal and Visual Materials 377
Verbal Materials 377
Key Terms 358
Visual Materials 378
Notes 358
xii Contents
A
s we prepare this revision, we are struck by how many important develop-
ments have happened in the world around us since the 15th edition. From
the COVID-19 pandemic to what can seem like unprecedented social divides,
our day-to-day lives feel different this time around. We worked hard in this revision
to capture what some of those developments might mean for the future of effective
group discussions.
Our focus continues to be communication: how communication creates, main-
tains, and changes a group through interaction among members and with the group’s
environment. We encourage members and leaders to employ effective and ethical
principles of communication, so their group experiences are as rewarding as they can
be. We continue to highlight bona fide group theory and return a focus to models of
group development, which we believe has contributed significantly to our understand-
ing of how real-world groups actually work. We also note that the technology avail-
able to help groups has become much more affordable, accessible, and expected than
when we first started writing. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is simply
accepted now that all groups will conduct at least part of their discussion in an online
environment. To that end, we discuss groups not as either face-to-face or virtual, but
as entities that can use a variety of technologies to assist their work and as existing on
a continuum from purely face-to-face to purely virtual. We incorporate information
about technology throughout the text.
When our students complete their study of small groups, we hope they will know
how to use the information and tools we present to understand why one group is
satisfying and another feels like torture. Most important of all, we hope they will
understand what they can do about it. Thus, as with previous editions, this book is
based on current research; our advice to students stems from what we know about
communication and small groups.
Effective Group Discussion focuses on secondary groups, such as work groups,
committees, task forces, self-directed work teams, and other small groups including
virtual ones with tasks to complete. The text provides practical tips and also serves
well as a reference source for advanced communication students, consultants, or
group leaders.
xiv Preface
Overview
Generally, the chapters move the discussion from group systems inputs to throughput
processes to outcomes. Instructors have the flexibility to skim or skip chapters or
cover them in a different order. For instance, a section in Chapter 2 covers basic com-
munication theory for students without a previous communication course, but this
section can be skimmed quickly if it reviews material students already know.
Part I presents an overview of small group and human communication theory.
Chapter 1 introduces several ideas developed in subsequent chapters: the importance
of small groups in our lives, types of groups, how many groups use technology, what
constitutes ethical behavior, and why members should become participant-observers
in their groups. Chapter 2 presents the basics of communication theory that serve
as the foundation for studying small groups. In Chapter 3, we present systems theory as
the organizing framework used throughout the text.
Part II begins the discussion of group developing by focusing on the members,
the main small group inputs. Chapter 4 introduces the importance of diversity and the
contribution that members’ cultures and co-cultures make to that diversity. Chapter 5
discusses how member characteristics contribute to the roles that members play in
groups, including a section about the relationship of the “Big Five” personality char-
acteristics from psychology to what happens in small groups.
Part III focuses on the development of the group as an entity by presenting infor-
mation about a variety of throughput processes. Chapter 6 consolidates logically the
information about norms, fantasy themes, and cohesiveness. Chapters 7 and 8 are
companion leadership chapters. Chapter 7 focuses on the theoretical concepts nec-
essary to understanding leadership, and Chapter 8 provides practical suggestions for
group leaders.
Part IV discusses the importance of having appropriate problem-solving and
decision-making processes to improve the quality of group outputs. As with leader-
ship, Chapters 9 and 10 are paired, with Chapter 9 providing conceptual information
for understanding group development, problem solving, and decision making and
Chapter 10 providing specific suggestions and techniques for improving problem-
solving and decision-making processes. Chapter 11 focuses on how conflict, if man-
aged well, can improve group outputs.
In Part V, Chapter 12 presents tools for assessing and improving small groups.
Users of the text told us they preferred to have this chapter placed at the end,
following discussions of theories and concepts. However, these tools and assessments
can easily be used throughout the text to enhance discussion of concepts, if instruc-
tors prefer.
Appendix A guides members in how to gather and organize their informational
resources in preparation for problem solving and decision making. Although this
information conceptually precedes Chapters 9 and 10, most upper-division students
already know how to gather information. Appendix B discusses the public presenta-
tion of a group’s work, including how to organize presentations so the information is
presented smoothly and seamlessly.
Preface xv
Features
■ Case Studies: Each chapter begins with a case study illustrating that chapter’s
main points. These are real-life stories designed to help students retain key
concepts and understand how that chapter’s information is relevant to the real
world. We link these case studies explicitly to information presented throughout
the chapter.
■ Recap Boxes: We have placed Recap boxes—internal summaries—throughout each
chapter. They provide logical “breathing places” for students to review what they
have learned.
xvi Preface
65%
A complete course platform
Connect enables you to build deeper connections with your students through
cohesive digital content and tools, creating engaging learning experiences. Less Time
We are committed to providing you with the right resources and tools to
support all your students along their personal learning journeys. Grading
W
e would like to thank all of the instructors and students who have used
Effective Group Discussion. We welcome your written reactions to its
content and composition. You can send your comments to us via the
Department of Communication, Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri; or
the Department of Communication, California State University, Fresno, California.
May all your groups be enjoyable and satisfying!
Numerous people contributed to this book; we can name only a few. First, we
acknowledge our debt to instructors and writers Freed Bales, Ernest Bormann, Elton
S. Carter, B. Aubrey Fisher, Larry Frey, Kenneth Hance, Randy Hirokawa, Sidney J.
Parnes, J. Donald Phillips, M. Scott Poole, Linda Putnam, Marvin Shaw, Victor Wall,
and W. Woodford Zimmerman.
Finally, we want to acknowledge the vision and contributions of Jack Brilhart,
who died in 2005. Jack wrote the first version of this text in the late 1960s as one
monograph in a communication series. For many years, Jack shared his expertise,
his passion for understanding and working with small groups, and his vast experience
working with a variety of groups. We enjoyed working with him, appreciated his gen-
erosity, and greatly miss him.
The following instructors were exceptionally helpful in supplying thoughtful,
carefully considered suggestions:
Suzanne Atkin, Janet Jacobsen,
Workplace Harmony Arizona State University
Ewan Tristan Booth, Chris Kasch,
Arizona State University Bradley University
Aileen Buslig, Melissa Leembruggin,
Concordia College Sinclair College
Jessica Delk-McCall, Peter Miraldi,
University of North Carolina Pennsylvania State
Greensboro UniversityPreface
The Foundations
of Communicating
in Groups
T he three chapters in Part I provide the focus to your study of small group communi-
cation. Chapter 1 introduces important terms and concepts used throughout the text.
Chapter 2 lays the groundwork for understanding the communicative dynamics of small
group interaction. Chapter 3 presents systems theory as a framework for studying and
understanding small groups.
P A R T
I
Tinpixels/Getty Images
The Small
Groups in
Everyone’s Life
stockbroker/123RF
C H A P T E R 1
S T U DY O B J E C T I V E S CENTRAL MESSAGE
As a result of studying Chapter 1, you should be able to: If you want to succeed in
1. Explain the need for understanding small group communication
and for participating productively in small group discussions. modern organizational
2. Be familiar with some of the ways technology can help a group and social life, you must
be more productive.
understand how to be a
3. Correctly distinguish the terms presented in this chapter,
particularly group, small group, small group discussion, and productive group member
ethics.
and act accordingly, including
4. Describe the difference between primary and secondary groups.
5. Consciously and intentionally become a participant–observer knowing how technology can
during group discussions.
benefit a group’s work.
6. Describe the six ethical principles most relevant to small group
communication.
4 Chapter 1
S
pringfield, Missouri, which is home to a few members of our authorship team,
has a two-day art festival each May, attended by 15,000 to 20,000 people.
Artsfest also offers music and dance performers of all kinds, food vendors, and
hands-on activities for children. This combination art show and community festival
requires the efforts of hundreds of people. Artsfest is organized by a committee of
volunteers working with representatives of the Springfield Regional Arts Council and
the Urban Districts Alliance. The large committee of 15 includes LaShonda, an artist
whose contacts extend throughout the region. She is mainly responsible for artist
recruitment and correspondence. Raj is a technology guru who manages Artsfest’s
social media campaigns on Facebook and Twitter. Pam is a long-time community
volunteer who knows everyone and is a lot of fun to work with. Her extensive lists
of contacts provide the core of volunteers who work at the event, handling artist
check-in, managing registration, taking gate receipts, selling T-shirts and souvenirs,
providing security, and so forth. In addition, Pam encourages a warm and relaxed
atmosphere in group meetings—she usually brings cookies. Jerry and Selena, the event
coordinators, are both well-organized individuals who are not thrown by the level of
detail that must be handled. Selena maintains spreadsheets with detailed records
of prior festivals at her fingertips. She knows exactly how many T-shirts were ordered
in prior years, how many artists were new to the festival, and how much money was
made in soft-drink sales. Jerry’s list of corporate sponsors is extensive; if one sponsor
decides to drop out, he has three possibilities lined up to replace that sponsor.
The committee meets every other week from January through March and weekly
in April, with committee members keeping in touch with one another via technology
between meetings. For example, committee members use Dropbox to view and make
suggestions for wording on artist recruitment letters and other documents. When an
issue arose between meetings that needed a quick answer, members voted by e-mail.
The committee’s normal meeting location was unexpectedly unavailable at one
meeting; members were notified by text message of the temporary location. Jerry had
to be out of town during one important meeting just before the event; the commit-
tee used Zoom so he could participate. Members frequently call or text one another
between meetings as they think of things that need to be handled.
This example illustrates an important point: one person alone does not have
what it takes to accomplish a complex task liking hosting Artsfest. Working together,
however, individuals in a group can achieve far more than individuals working alone.
And with the emergence of easy-to-use technologies, group members can make their
participation in groups even more effective.
Small groups are the basic building blocks of our society.1 Lawrence Frey,
a leading scholar of small group communication, believes as we do that the small
group is the most important social formation:
Every segment of our society—from the largest multinational organization to the polit-
ical workings of federal, state, city, and local governments to the smallest commu-
nity action group to friendship groups to the nuclear and extended family—relies on
groups to make important decisions, socialize members, satisfy needs, and the like.2
The Small Groups in Everyone’s Life 5
We spend a tremendous amount of time in groups. In the United States, for exam-
ple, the typical professional attends at least eight meetings a week, while executives
attend more than double that amount on average.3 And the time we spend in meetings
only increases over time!4 When you also consider the amount of time we spend infor-
mally in groups outside of work, you begin to appreciate how pervasive groups are
in our lives. However, poorly managed meetings hurt the very organizations they are
supposed to support, wasting valuable time and resources and losing as much as
$37 billion in the United States, alone each year.5 Moreover, the ability to commu-
nicate effectively in group interactions requires skills that must be understood and
practiced. In a national survey, over 70 percent of respondents from 750 leading
U.S. companies ranked the “ability to work in teams” as a more essential skill for
MBA graduates than knowledge of statistical techniques.6 Learning to be a good team
member is essential to our personal, professional, and social lives.
To start off, we want you to consider three important ideas about groups.
First, the formation of groups is natural to humans. Why? Groups are a fundamen-
tal way humans meet important social needs. Schutz explained that we use groups
to belong and identify with others (inclusion), to find and experience openness
(formerly called affection), and to exercise power over others and our environment
(control).7 Notice that each of these three needs requires the participation of others
and is so significant to us that we often relinquish our own resources, such as time
and energy, to participate in groups and satisfy our basic human needs. For example,
the Artsfest Planning Committee we described above works hard to host the festival
every year because they feel connected to the art community, have built friendships
and strong professional relationships through their work, and take pride in the
positive influence they have on the local community. They understand the festival
could not happen without their collective efforts.
David Brooks, a national political and cultural commentator, speculated that
humans are wired to cooperate and collaborate, just as much as they are to compete.
Groups provide a vehicle by which we can engage in these interactions.8 Stop for a
moment and think about all the groups you have participated in this past week, includ-
ing family and peer groups. We have found that most college students average about
8 to 10, and sometimes list as many as 24 groups. For example, one student listed the
following: family, Bible study, sorority, executive committee of sorority, study group
in small group class, project group in marketing class, intramural volleyball team,
carpool, and sales team in the clothing department at work.
Does this seem like a lot of groups? Consider this: Reliance on groups is increas-
ing in every aspect of our society, but particularly in the workplace. Managers in the
United States recognize the value of participative decision making now more than
ever before, primarily because the small group is one important tool for encour-
aging employee participation and improving the quality of corporate decisions.9
Given this increased use of work teams, Monster.com, a popular employment
website, lists collaboration as one of the most appealing skills for hiring managers
in all industries.10
6 Chapter 1
Why is group work so popular? In the long run, groups are usually better problem
solvers than individuals because they have access to more information than individ-
uals do, can spot flaws and biases in each others’ thinking, and can think of issues
an individual may have failed to consider. Moreover, if people participate in planning
the work of solving the problem, they are more likely to work harder and better at
carrying out the solution. Thus, participation in problem solving and decision making
helps guarantee continued commitment to decisions and solutions (see Chapter 9).
Second, just because we participate in groups often, we cannot assume we partici-
pate effectively. Many of us likely have several examples of group work going poorly.
However, unless we know something about why a group is unproductive or ineffective,
Grouphate we won’t be able to help the group improve. Grouphate is a concept that captures a
The feeling of relatively common negative attitude toward groups that may get in the way of effective
antipathy and hostility group participation.11 In spite of recognizing the central role of groups in our lives, we
many people have often have mixed feelings about them, due in large measure to the tradeoffs involved.
about working in a In return for meeting our needs, we give up autonomy and the ability to do whatever
group, fostered by we want, whenever we want. For instance, students often complain that group grades
the many ineffective, do not reflect their superior individual performance. Some people may even loathe
time-wasting groups being a member of a group.12 Interestingly, grouphate is partly caused by a lack
that exist.
of training in how to communicate effectively and appropriately as a group member.
A group communication course may be an important first step at addressing any
grouphate you may experience. It is also in your best interest to work at eliminating
feelings of grouphate because students with negative attitudes about participating in
groups have been less successful academically than those with more constructive and
positive orientations toward group work.13
Third, groups provide the vehicle by which the individual can make a contribution
to the organization and society as a whole. Larkin postulated that humans have a
motivation to give. The basic ingredient cementing social cohesion is not the
satisfaction of needs, but rather the availability for contribution. It may be that
individuals join groups not only to meet their own needs but also to have oppor-
tunities to contribute to something bigger than themselves.14 Lawson found that
people who give of their time, money, energy, and other resources live healthier,
happier, and more fulfilled lives; they report that their lives are more meaningful
than those who do not give.15 This finding is confirmed in research by Strubler and
York, who report that members of a team felt a greater sense of participation
and believed their work within the organization was more meaningful and worth-
while than non-team members.16
To help you understand these ideas about groups, our focus is on the commu-
nicative dynamics of group members—what people say and do in groups. While we
will draw upon findings from other disciplines, we will concentrate on the process of
communication among members and how group members can influence this process.
The groups we examine will cover a range of contexts: educational, religious, political,
corporate, entertainment, health, community, and social services. As you study the
central concepts we will be using throughout this text, remember that the complexity
of small group interaction among members cannot be reduced to a cookie-cutter set
The Small Groups in Everyone’s Life 7
influences and is influenced by each other” implies that members are aware of each
other, and from this mutual awareness we ground our definition of small on percep-
Small Group tual awareness. A small group, therefore, is a group small enough that each member is
A group of at least aware of and able to recall each other group member, know who is and is not in the
three but few enough group, and recognize what role each is taking. Attempts to define small on the basis
members for each to of the number of members have never worked well. Practically, however, small groups
perceive all others are usually comprised of three to seven members with five being the most effective.20
as individuals, share No doubt you have heard and used the word team and might wonder whether
some identity or there is a difference between a small group and a team. Some scholars see teams as
common purpose, highly functioning groups with a strong group identity and highly structured with
and share standards
very explicit rules and clearly defined member responsibilities.21 Others reserve
for governing
their activities as
team for groups in which leadership is shared, such as the case with self-managed
members. work groups.22 In a comprehensive review of the research into team dynamics,
Salas, Sims, and Burke discovered a recurring theme in all the different definitions
of team: the recognition of interdependence between members as they strive toward
Small Group a group goal.23 Thus, we do not differentiate the two terms—group and team—and use
Discussion them interchangeably. A small group may be called a team (e.g., top management
A small group of team), yet function no better than other groups of its kind. Like LaFasto and Larson,
people communicating we are interested in groups that function well, no matter what they are called.24
with each other Interaction, mutual influence, and interdependence are all central features of
to achieve some a group. Coordinating behavior requires the exchange of messages; thus, the most
interdependent goal, central feature of human groups is their communication. Verbal and nonverbal
such as increased
exchange among group members is where the work of the group gets accomplished.
understanding,
coordination of activity,
This exchange may be face-to-face or may use technology. For our purposes,
or solution to a shared small group discussion (see Table 1.1) refers to a small group of people talking with
problem. each other in order to achieve some interdependent goal, such as increasing shared
understanding, coordinating activity, or solving a problem.
TABLE 1.1
Small group 1. Small enough (typically between three and seven) for each member to be
discussion aware of and have some reaction to each other.
characteristics 2. A mutually interdependent purpose, making the success of any one member
contingent upon the success of all.
3. A sense of belonging to the group felt by each member.
4. The give and take of impromptu communication, involving both verbal and
nonverbal messages, as group members respond to and adapt their actions
to each other.
5. A sense of cooperation between members, even in disagreements and
conflict, where they perceive that they are pursuing a group outcome that will
be satisfactory to everyone.
6. Interaction that occurs on a continuum from purely face-to-face to virtual.
Most groups today use some form of technology in conjunction with their
face-to-face group work, and even if their interaction is totally virtual, all the
characteristics mentioned here still apply.
The Small Groups in Everyone’s Life 9
H uman beings are social creatures and form groups naturally. Groups are so
pervasive in our lives that we may overlook their importance. Even though
negative experiences working in groups can turn many people away from group work,
the fact of the matter is that effective small group interaction has profound practical
consequences in our personal and professional lives.
1. People use groups to meet inclusion, control, and openness needs. Group
participation allows people to make significant contributions to each other and society.
2. Being a group participant does not guarantee effective group behavior; group
members have to work to coordinate their actions toward a shared goal.
3. Groups are not merely collections of individuals, but they involve interaction,
interdependence, and mutual influence.
4. Small groups are not defined by the number of people in a group but by their limits
of perceptual awareness.
5. Small group discussion highlights the key role communication plays in defining
a collection of people as a small group with a sense of belonging, purpose, and
collaboration.
such as school districts and local governments put together task forces and response
teams for the purpose of designing and implementing pandemic response measures.
These groups were secondary groups with specific performance objectives to be
attained, and members had to coordinate their efforts in order to achieve their goals.
As you may have discerned by this point, there are no pure primary or secondary
groups. Although groups are classified as primary or secondary according to their
major function, primary groups also engage in work and secondary groups also pro-
vide openness and belonging to their members. In fact, Anderson and Martin demon-
strated that secondary group members are motivated by a number of factors that
are more primary than secondary, including desires for enjoyment and emotional
escape. Such factors strongly influence secondary group members’ communication
behaviors, their feelings of loneliness, and their satisfaction with the group.26
Research is clear: working on a task must be supported with good social skills helping
members feel included, appreciated, and even loved.27
In addition to the two major classifications just described, there are many other
ways to categorize groups. The four categories described next exhibit both primary
and secondary characteristics in varying degrees, with the fourth more purely
secondary than the first three.
Activity Group
A group formed
Activity Groups
primarily for members Activity groups enable members to participate in an activity, both for the sake of
to participate in doing the activity and for the affiliation provided by doing the activity with others.
an activity such as The following are examples: book clubs, running clubs, recreational vehicle clubs,
bridge, bowling, hunting groups, video gaming clubs, and numerous other interest groups. Members of
hunting, and so forth. such groups solve problems and make choices—when and where to meet, how to
pay for their activities, how group membership is determined—but enjoyment of the
activity and fellowship with others whose interests are similar are the main purposes.
Personal Growth Group
A group of people
who come together Personal Growth Groups
to develop personal Therapy and support groups are called personal growth groups. They are composed of
insights, overcome people who come together to develop personal insights, help themselves and others
personality problems, with personal problems, and grow as individuals from the feedback and support
and grow personally
of others. Goal interdependence is low because no purely group goal is sought; rather,
through feedback
and support of others.
members meet their individual needs for personal learning, awareness, and support in
the context of the group. Examples include Alcoholics Anonymous, grief support
groups, LGBTQ or women’s rights groups, etc.
Learning Group
A group discussing Educational Groups
for the purpose
Small groups occur in educational contexts for a variety of purposes. Common
of learning about
learning groups, often called study groups, form so that members can understand a
and understanding
a subject more subject better by pooling their knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs. These tend to be
completely. voluntary and coordinated by interested students. Others, including cohorts, coopera-
tive learning groups, and collaborative learning groups, are used by educators and
The Small Groups in Everyone’s Life 11
1. Primary groups, like family and friends, help us meet our needs for belonging and
openness.
2. Secondary groups, those commonly referred to as task groups, help us meet our
needs for control and achievement.
3. Subtypes of primary and secondary groups often mix the purposes of both.
These may include activity, personal growth, educational, and problem-solving
groups such as committees, quality control circles, self-managed work groups,
and top management teams.
14 Chapter 1
from various factors that include, but are not limited to, race, ethnicity, age,
religion, gender identity, and sexual orientation.37 These factors contribute
to differences in members’ perspectives—the very differences that have the
potential to enrich and enhance a group’s performance. Groupings such as
race, ethnicity, and gender form what Orbe calls co-cultures, smaller groups
that exist “simultaneously within, as well as apart from, other cultures”38
in the United States. However, group members from such co-cultures run
the risk of being marginalized, with their perspectives and opinions ignored
by members of the dominant culture. Orbe argues that co-culture members
have to work harder to be included and have their opinions considered than
do members of the dominant culture. The challenge to group members,
particularly those representing the dominant culture, is to make it possible for
all members—regardless of co-culture—to contribute equally. Members who
marginalize fellow group members both behave unethically and defeat the
purpose of the group.
4. Group members must conduct themselves with honesty and integrity.
Honesty and integrity take various forms. First, and most obviously, group
members should not intentionally deceive one another or manufacture
information or evidence to persuade other members to their points of
view. Members must not falsify data and must document the sources of
information they share with the group. Integrity implies that members
should support group decisions, which may present challenges for
the individual member. Sometimes you may be asked to do something
for a group that violates your own personal values, beliefs, morals, or
principles. For example, what if a group to which you belong decides to
suppress information that is contrary to a decision the group wishes to
make and pressures you to go along? What will you do? Only you can
answer that question. You may try your best to persuade the group to see
things your way; you may decide to leave the group. But if you choose to
stay with the group, make sure you can support, or at least live with, the
group’s actions and decisions. Integrity also suggests that you are willing
to place the good of the group ahead of your own individual goals. A team
orientation is a core component of successful teams.39 Focusing on the
team involves being willing to hear alternatives offered by other members
and assessing those in an effort to determine which one is best for the
team. It also involves willingness among members to offer feedback about
each other’s actions and to accept suggestions from one another about
how to behave better for the good of the group. Individuals unwilling or
unable to adopt a team orientation make poor team members, and the
group is better off without them.
5. Group members should always treat one another with respect. They should not
disconfirm, belittle, or ridicule other members and should make sure they
understand other members before agreeing or disagreeing with them. As we
interact with others, our first goal should be to strive to understand others
16 Chapter 1
KEY TERMS
Test your knowledge of these key terms in this chapter. Definitions can be found in the Glossary.
NOTES
1. Kurt W. Back, “The Small Group: Tightrope 4. Sayed M. Elsayed-Elkhouly, Harold Lazarus, and
between Sociology and Personality,” Journal of Volville Forsythe, “Why Is a Third of Your Time
Applied Behavioral Science, 15 (1979): 283–94. Wasted in Meetings?,” Journal of Management
2. Lawrence W. Frey, “Applied Communication Development, 16 (1997): 672–76.
Research on Group Facilitation in Natural 5. Ibid.
Settings,” in Innovations in Group Facilitation: 6. Charles C. DuBois, “Portrait of the Ideal MBA,”
Applications in Natural Settings, ed. Lawrence The Penn Stater (September/October 1992): 31.
R. Frey (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995): 7. Will Schutz, The Human Element: Productivity,
1–26. Self-Esteem, and the Bottom Line (San Francisco,
3. Jack Flynn, “27 Incredible Meeting Statistics CA: Jossey-Bass, 1994).
[2022]: Virtual, Zoom, In-Person Meetings and 8. David Brooks, “Nice Guys Finish First,” The New
Productivity,” Zippia.com, January 31, 2022. York Times, The Opinion Pages, May 16, 2011.
Retrieved April 26, 2022 at https:// Retrieved May 16, 2011, at http://topics.nytimes.
www.zippia.com/advice/meeting-statistics/ com/top/opinoin/editorialsandoped/oped/
#Meeting_Trends_and_Predictions. columnists/davidbrooks/index.html?inline=nyt-per.
18 Chapter 1
9. Eduardo Salas, Dana E. Sims, and C. Shawn Burke, 23. Salas, Sims, and Burke, 559–62.
“Is There a ‘Big Five’ in Teamwork?,” Small Group 24. Frank M. J. Lafasto and Carl E. Larson. When
Research, 36 (2005): 555–99. Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team Members and
10. Sally Buffalo, “These Are the 9 Skills That Would Leaders Tell What It Takes to Succeed. Thousand
Make Any Hiring Manager Happy.” Retrieved Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
April 25, 2022, at https://www.monster.com/ 25. Thomas J. Socha, “Communication in Family
career-advice/article/skills-hiring-manager-wants. Units: Studying the ‘First’ Group,” in The Hand-
11. Susan Sorensen, “Grouphate: A Negative book of Group Communication Theory and Research,
Reaction to Group Work.” Paper presented at ed. Lawrence R. Frey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
the International Communication Association, 1999): 475–92.
Minneapolis, May 1981. 26. Carolyn M. Anderson and Matthew M. Martin,
12. Joann Keyton and Lawrence R. Frey, “The State “The Effects of Communication Motives,
of Traits: Predispositions and Group Interaction Involvement, and Loneliness on
Communication,” in New Directions in Group Satisfaction: A Model of Small Groups,” Small
Communication, ed. Lawrence R. Frey Group Research, 26 (February 1995): 118–37.
(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002): 109. 27. Joann Keyton and Stephensen J. Beck, “The
13. K. A. Freeman, “Attitudes Toward Work in Project Influential Role of Relational Messages in Group
Groups as Predictors of Group Performance,” Interaction,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research,
Small Group Research, 27 (1996): 265–82. and Practice, 13 (2009): 14–30.
14. T. J. Larkin, “Humanistic Principles for 28. Terre H. Allen and Timothy G. Plax, “Exploring
Organization Management,” Central States Consequences of Group Communication in
Speech Journal, 37 (1986): 37. the Classroom,” in New Directions in Group
15. Douglas M. Lawson, Give to Live: How Giving Communication, ed. Lawrence R. Frey
Can Change Your Life (LaJolla, CA: ALTI (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002): 219–34.
Publishing, 1991). 29. Peg Thoms, Jeffrey K. Pinto, Diane H. Parente,
16. David C. Strubler and Kenneth M. York, “An and Vanessa U. Druskat, “Adaptation to Self-
Exploratory Study of the Team Characteristics Managing Work Teams,” Small Group Research,
Model Using Organizational Teams,” Small 33 (2002): 3–31.
Group Research, 38 (2007): 670–95. 30. Maria Doblinger, “Individual Competencies for
17. Marvin E. Shaw, Group Dynamics: The Psychology Self-Managing Team Performance: A Systematic
of Small Group Behavior, 3rd ed. (New York: Literature Review,” Small Group Research, 53
McGraw-Hill, 1980): 8. (2022): 128–80.
18. Donald G. Ellis and B. Aubrey Fisher, Small 31. Zorn and Thompson, “Communication in Top,”
Group Decision Making: Communication and the 254–56.
Group Process, 4th ed. (New York: McGraw Hill, 32. J. Barney, “Looking Inside for Competitive
1994): 5. Advantage,” Academy of Management Review,
19. Shaw, Group Dynamics, p. 8. 9 (1995): 49–61.
20. Susan A. Wheelan, “Group Size, Group 33. The Random House Dictionary of the English
Development, and Group Productivity,” Small Language, 2nd ed. unabridged (New York:
Group Research, 40 (2009): 247–62. Random House, 1987): 665.
21. Gay Lumsden and Donald Lumsden, 34. National Communication Association Code
Communicating in Groups and Teams: Sharing of Professional Ethics for the Communication
Leadership (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993): Scholar/Teacher. Retrieved May 16, 2011, at
13–15; Steven Beebe and John Masterson, www.natcom.org/Default.aspx?id=135&terms=
Communicating in Small Groups, 7th ed. (Boston, Code%20of%20Ethics.
MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2003), 6–9. 35. See Rob Anderson and Veronica Ross, Questions
22. Thomas E. Harris and John C. Sherblom, Small of Communication: A Practical Introduction to
Group and Team Communication (Boston: Allyn Theory, 2nd ed. (Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s,
and Bacon, 1999): 123–31. 1998), Chapter 10.
The Small Groups in Everyone’s Life 19
36. Ronald C. Arnett, “The Practical Philosophy 40. Charles Duhigg, “What Google Learned from
of Communication Ethics and Free Speech as Its Quest to Build a Perfect Team,” The New
the Foundation for Speech Communication,” York Times, February 25, 2016. Retrieved at
Communication Quarterly, 38 (Summer 1990): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/
208–17. what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-
37. Brenda J. Allen, “‘Diversity’ and Organizational perfect-team.html?smid=nytcore-ipad-share&
Communication,” Journal of Applied smprod=nytcore-ipad.
Communication Research, 23 (1995): 143–55. 41. Salas, Sims, and Burke, 568–70.
38. Mark P. Orbe, “From the Standpoint(s) of 42. Benjamin J. Broome and Luann Fulbright,
Traditionally Muted Groups: Explicating a “A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to
Co-cultural Communication Theoretical Model,” Group Problem Solving: A Participant-Generated
Communication Theory, 8 (February 1998): 2. Agenda for Small Group Research,” Small Group
39. Salas, Sims, and Burke, 584–87. Research, 26 (February 1995): 25–55.
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
tamer of the steed, of the race of Neptune, plucks
down the palisade, and calls for ladders to the
battlement. 10
Such was the appeal of Juno: and the whole body of immortals 5
murmured assent on this side or on that, like new-born
gales when they murmur, caught in the forest, and
roll about mysterious sounds, disclosing to the sailor a
coming storm. Then begins the almighty sire, whose is
the chief sovereignty of the universe: at opening of his 10
mouth the lofty palace of the gods grows still, and earth
shakes to her foundations; silent is the height of ether; the
Zephyrs are sunk to rest, and Ocean subdues its waves to
repose. “Take then to your hearts and engrave there
these my words: since it may not be that Ausonian and 15
Teucrian should be united by treaty, and your wranglings
brook no conclusion, be each man’s fortune to-day what
it may, be the span of each man’s hope long or short,
Trojan or Rutulian, I will show favour to neither, whether
it be by destiny that the Italian leaguer encompasses the 20
camp, or by Troy’s baneful error and the warnings of hostile
intelligence. Nor leave I the Rutulians free. Each man’s
own endeavours shall yield him the harvest of labour or
fortune. Jove, as king, is alike to all. Destiny shall find
her own way.” By the river of his Stygian brother, by the 25
banks that seethe with pitch and are washed by the
murky torrent, he nodded confirmation, and with his nod
made all Olympus tremble. So ended their debate.
Then from his golden throne rises Jove, and the immortals
gathering round him usher him to his chamber. 30
So they on this side and on that had waged all day the
conflict of stubborn war; and now at midnight Æneas
was ploughing the main. For soon as, leaving Evander,
he entered the Etruscan camp, accosted the king, and told 25
him of his name and his race, for what he sues and what
he offers, explains what arms Mezentius musters on his
side, and what the excess of Turnus’ violence, warns him
how little faith man can place in fortune, and seconds
reasoning by entreaty, without a moment’s pause Tarchon 30
combines his forces and strikes a truce; and at once, freed
from the spell of destiny, the Lydian race embarks according
to heaven’s ordinance, under the charge of a foreign
leader. First sails the vessel of Æneas, Phrygian lions
harnessed on the prow; above them Ida spreads her shade, 35
of happiest augury to exiled Troy. There sits great Æneas
brooding over the doubtful future of the war: and Pallas,
close cleaving to his left side, keeps questioning him,
now of the stars, the road-marks of the shadowy night,
and now of all that he has borne by land and by sea.
And now the day had withdrawn from the sky, and
gracious Dian was trampling over the cope of heaven with
her night-flying steeds: Æneas the while, for care refuses
slumber to his frame, is seated at his post, himself guiding
the rudder and trimming the sail—when lo! in the middle 30
of his voyage he is met by a fair bevy of comrades of his
own: the Nymphs whom gracious Cybele had invested
with the deity of the sea, and changed from ships to goddesses,
were swimming abreast and cleaving the billow,
a Nymph for each of the brazen prows that erst had 35
lined the shore. Far off they recognize their king, and
come dancing round him in state: Cymodoce, their skilfullest
in speech, swimming up behind, lays her right hand on
the stern, herself lifted breast high above the water,
while with her left she paddles in the noiseless wave.
Then thus she breaks on his wondering ear: “Wake you,
Æneas, seed of the gods? be wakeful still, and let the sail-ropes
go. We it is you see, pines of Ida from the sacred 5
summit, Sea-nymphs now, your sometime fleet. When
the false Rutulian was hot at our backs with fire and sword,
reluctantly we burst your bonds, and are now in full quest
of you over the sea. This new shape the great mother gave
us in her pity, and granted us the state of goddesses and 10
lives to lead beneath the water. Meantime young Ascanius
is hemmed in by rampart and trench, with serried
weapons all around him, and Latians bristling with battle.
Already the Arcadian horse mixed with the brave Etruscan
has gained the appointed spot: to bar their way with an 15
intervening host and cut them off from the camp is
Turnus’ fixed intent. Rise, and with the earliest approach
of dawn bid your allies be summoned to arms, and take in
hand that shield which the Fire-god himself made to
be invincible and bordered with a marge of gold. The 20
morrow’s sun, if you will but give credence to my words,
shall survey mighty heaps of Rutulian carnage.” Her
speech was done: and as she parted she gave with her
hand an impulse to the lofty stern, well knowing the due
measure of force: on it speeds over the wave, fleeter than 25
dart and wind-swift arrow both. The rest in order mend
their speed. Wondering he pauses, the great Trojan of
Anchises’ line, yet cheers his soul with the omen. Then,
looking to the vault above, he prays in brief: “Gracious
mother of the gods, lady of Ida, whose joy is in Dindymus, 30
and in turreted cities and harnessed lions at thy
bridle-rein, be thou now to me the controller of the fight,
do thou bring the presage nigh, and walk beside the
Phrygians, mighty goddess, with favouring step.” Thus
much he said: and meanwhile day was returning at speed, 35
with its light grown to full strength, and night had vanished
before it.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookfinal.com