jose_MINI2nd
jose_MINI2nd
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
Accurate rainfall forecasts are important for sectors such as agriculture, disaster
management. Industry based on weather models, etc. Traditional weather forecasts
often face the problem of accurate short-term forecasts due to the complex atmospheric
system.
This project focuses on developing a rainfall forecasting system using a random forest
algorithm. With an accuracy of 85%, the model classifies rain events based on historical
weather data. This makes it extremely valuable for government agencies, farmers, and
city planners. and other stakeholders Accurate forecasts help make better decisions
about resource management. Preparedness for dealing with disasters and agricultural
practices
The dataset used for this project comes from Kaggle, containing 145,460 data points
and 23 features, including temperature, humidity, wind direction, and barometric
pressure, with RainTomorrow as the target variable. Data pre-processing Category
types and numbers that classify features Deal with missing values With the precision of
the median inter-quartile range Categorical variables are converted to numeric format
through label coding, which includes removing outliers using (IQR) methods.
Performance is evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, and AUC used to train
the model. Creating multiple decision trees to increase accuracy and reduce overfitting
using Random Forest Algorithm. This project demonstrates the effectiveness of the
random forest algorithm in Rainfall forecast This provides practical benefits for various
sectors. who have to rely on accurate weather forecasts.
1.2 Motivation
Increased variability in weather patterns and unpredictable weather conditions increase the
need for accurate rainfall forecasts. Wrong predictions can have dire consequences.
especially in the agricultural sector Where poor forecasts can lead to crop failure or
inefficient water use.
The motivation behind this rainfall prediction system is to address these challenges by
creating a reliable tool that helps farmers optimize their irrigation strategies. It also helps
urban planners monitor water resources and helps governments prepare for possible floods
or droughts. By leveraging machine learning techniques, We can analyze historical weather
data efficiently. To increase the accuracy of rainfall forecasts This will ultimately improve
the overall performance of the forecasting system.
1.3 Objectives
1.6 Methodology
In this assignment, we adopted the Agile technique[3], mainly making use of the Scrum
framework to guide our development process. Agile is a flexible, iterative technique to
task control and software program development that encourages incremental
development through non-stop remarks and collaboration. It focuses on turning in
small, manageable portions of a project over short periods, allowing for adaptability to
change and improving overall project outcomes.
Within Agile, Scrum is a widely-used method where work is divided into cycles known
as sprints, each aimed toward delivering a potentially releasable product increment.
Scrum emphasizes teamwork, responsibility, and iterative progress towards a well-
defined intention.
For this project, we identified 9 product backlog items that mentioned the tasks
required to complete the rain prediction system. These responsibilities have been
broken down and organized into four sprints. Each sprint focused on the specific
aspects of the project, from data collection and preprocessing to model training,
testing, and evaluation. By following this iterative system, we ensured non-stop
development, delivering each phase of the project efficiently and on time
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEWS
Introduction
This paper is published in 2020 by Moulana Mohammed, Roshitha Kolapalli, Niharika Golla,
and Siva Sai Maturi, it can be deduced that proper and correct prediction of rainfall helps for
better agriculture planning as well as disaster management; because of its major importance for
Indian and other states with full dependency on rain-based seasons for agriculture purposes,
machine learning technique was brought to this traditional system of rain forecasting in search
of new predictions to prevent failure at high time. The authors further suggest these methods
as ways of developing better forecast models and can therefore assist farmers and other related
stakeholders with the best decisions in optimizing water resources.
The study uses the historical rainfall data from the period of 1901 to 2015 covering monthly,
seasonal (three consecutive months) and yearly rainfall data over several subdivisions of India.
To strengthen the performance of the models and concentrate on important features, PCA is
used for dimensionality reduction. It reduces data dimensionality but retains relevant features
to help improve model accuracy and efficiency in machine learning.
Three machine learning models are used for the purpose of rainfall prediction. These are:
Multiple Linear Regression (MLR): The model analyses the relationship between one
dependent and multiple independent variables that capture linear correlations. It may not handle
the nonlinear relations that often exist in rainfall data.
Support Vector Regression (SVR): It is known for its robustness in handling nonlinear data.
SVR projects data into higher-dimensional spaces by using kernel functions to fit a hyper plane
that minimizes error within a defined margin. The epsilon and other hyper parameters are fine-
tuned to optimize the performance of SVR.
Random Forest Regression. It creates several decision trees in training, aggregating the
outcome to be even more precise and general rather than fit over the lines for each particular
decision tree. With these, random forest captures nonlinear, interaction among numerous
features of complex datasets very well.
2.1.2 Result
The Support Vector Regression had the best accuracy with an R² score of 0.9959 and low Mean
Absolute Error (MAE) of 4.35, which makes it the most accurate model to capture the nonlinear
rainfall patterns.
Random Forest Regression also performed very well with an R² score of 0.9952 and MAE of
5.02, which means it has the ability to deal with complex data interactions though a little less
accurately than the SVR.
MLR had lower accuracy compared to the other models because it failed to detect the non
linearity in the data: its R² score was 0.9958 and MAE was 10.95.
Conclusion
The study concludes that SVR is the best model for rainfall prediction because it can handle
nonlinear relationships and give high accuracy. The random forest regression also showed very
good performance, hence could be a good substitute in complex datasets. Therefore, SVR and
random forest are recommended for any high-precision meteorological prediction applications,
as these can give robust, accurate forecasts important for agricultural and disaster management
planning.
Introduction
The paper "Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning" published by Arnav Garg and
Himanshu Pandey in 2019 highlights the problem that regions with drastic climate change
conditions due to global warming face a higher demand for precise rainfall prediction.
Forecasting is crucial in rural areas and developing regions, where agriculture is highly
dependent on seasonally occurring rainfalls. In such areas, traditional predictive techniques are
usually less than satisfactory; hence the use of machine learning techniques that can more
frequently and reliably predict the patterns using rainfall data history. The aim of this study is
to develop an inexpensive accessible model for predicting rainfall applicable in communities
with limited technological infrastructure.
Monthly district-wise rainfall data for India covering from 1951 to 2015 are used in the study.
This data is sourced from the Ministry of Earth Science, India. It also falls under the National
Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy. The pre-processing of the data is done in Python through
Jupyter Notebook that cleaned the data as well as handled missing values. The data was divided
into a training set (1951-2014) and a testing set (2015) for model training and evaluation. This
structured approach allowed the authors to test the model's accuracy on recent data, simulating
real-world forecasting challenges.
The study evaluates three machine learning models for rainfall prediction:
Support Vector Machine: SVM is a kind of supervised learning algorithm generally classified
under classification and regression. In this paper, SVM makes hyperplane so that the rainfall
pattern classes can be classified under it. Its kernel function helps in the transformation of data
into higher dimensional to find linear as well as non-linear relationship. So for complex datasets
management SVM prove to be one of the robust approaches.
Random Forest: This is an ensemble learning technique with the help of which multiple
decision trees are built at the time of training, and each tree makes a different prediction. The
model aggregates all those predictions through averaging if it's regression or voting for
classification, and it gets greater accuracy along with low risk of overfitting. Random Forest
simply captures the complex, nonlinear patterns of data and noisy data and is therefore
performing very well in time-series data with seasonal and spatial variations such as rainfall.
Using the test data for the year 2015, performance assessment of models was conducted.
Random Forest gained maximum accuracy by capturing very nonlinear and complex
relationships of rainfall data through an ensemble approach. It well utilized the decision trees
for modeling rainfall variation with great precision; therefore, it would be preferred where both
accuracy and interpretability are desired. SVM was also very robust and resistant to slight
biases and inconsistencies and made accurate predictions even in the noise-limited scenarios.
KNN was less precise but was good enough for some of the simpler predictive tasks, although
it lacked the refinement that could be required with regards to the complex data such as rainfall.
2.2.2 Result
Applicability: Best suited for time series data, offering very high accuracy in predicting values
especially for continuous variables such as rainfall.
Random Forest
Accuracy: Similar to SVR, often scoring around 85%.
Applicability: Best suited for handling large datasets with numerous features. It performs very well in
classification tasks related to rainfall levels and can provide feature importance, which can help
understand what factors most affect the prediction of rainfall.
Readiness: Not very fit for time series data simply because it doesn't make good predictions regarding
the general pattern in weather patterns.
Conclusion
This concludes that Random Forest is the best model for rainfall prediction because it can handle
nonlinear data relationships and complexity, all while providing a very accurate model. The
ensemble nature allows generalization, making it excellent at identifying subtle patterns in
rainfall data. However, in the case of minor data inconsistencies, SVM stands out as a practical
alternative that is more robust and flexible. Such data variability could easily be found in
applications in real life, thereby making SVM and Random Forest a very reliable tool for
rainfall forecasting. In fact, such predictive modeling can offer a considerable difference in
planning and decision-making in rainfall-dependent regions to ultimately improve sustainability
and resilience in climate-sensitive areas.
CHAPTER 3
DATA COLLECTION
3.1 Data Source
The dataset used to create this precipitation forecast system was sourced from
Kaggle and is named "weatherAUS.csv". It contains about 10 years of daily weather
observations from Australian weather stations, providing rich material for forecasting
models The dataset contains 145,460 rows and 23 features, with the objective variable
"RainTomorrow" — a classification of whether or not it rained the next day. If the rain is
more than 1mm the column is marked "yes", otherwise "no".
Attributes of the Dataset: The dataset includes a wide kind of meteorological capabilities
that describe climate conditions for each day:
• WindSpeed3pm: The wind velocity (in km/h) averaged over 10 minutes earlier
than 3pm.
• Humidity9am: The percent humidity recorded at 9am.
• Humidity3pm: The percent humidity recorded at 3pm.
• Pressure9am: The atmospheric stress (in hPa) reduced to mean sea degree,
recorded at 9am.
• Pressure3pm: The atmospheric pressure (in hPa) decreased to mean sea level,
recorded at 3pm.
• Cloud9am: The fraction of the sky obscured by way of cloud at 9am, measured in
oktas (eighths of the sky).
• Cloud3pm: The fraction of the sky obscured with the aid of cloud at 3pm,
measured in oktas.
• Temp9am: The temperature (in degrees Celsius) recorded at 9am.
• Temp3pm: The temperature (in degrees Celsius) recorded at 3pm.
• RainToday: A binary indicator (Yes/No) of whether rainfall for the day handed
1mm.
• RainTomorrow: The intention variable indicating whether or not rainfall
tomorrow passed 1mm (Yes/No).
During the records preprocessing degree, the dataset exhibited lacking values, outliers, and
other anomalies, which were dealt with suitable measures. For instance, missing values had
been treated the usage of median imputation, while outliers had been recognized and
removed the use of the IQR (Interquartile Range) method.
Data Types: The dataset includes attributes with distinct facts sorts: numerical, discrete,
non-stop, and specific. Below is the breakdown of the statistics kinds and the capabilities
similar to each type:
CHAPTER 4
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sprint 1
In Sprint 1, completed two product backlog tasks, laying the foundation for the project. The
development made during this sprint is reflected inside the burndown chart below, which
indicates a steady reduction in the remaining workload because the duties have been finished
on schedule. This helped us maintain a clear trajectory for the subsequent sprints.
Fig 4.1 Graph of remaining effort and ideal trend wrt ssprint 1
Sprint 2
In Sprint 2, continued the momentum by completing two more backlog tasks. This sprint focused
on refining the core components and ensuring smooth integration of the features. The burndown
chart for Sprint 2 below illustrates the consistent progress made, with a gradual reduction in
pending tasks, keeping us aligned with the project goals.
Fig 4.2 Graph of remaining effort and ideal trend wrt sprint 2
Sprint 3
In Sprint three, made vast progress by completing 3 backlog obligations. This dash
emphasised improving the model's performance and improving data processing techniques.
The corresponding burndown chart for Sprint 3 suggests a regular decline in final
responsibilities, reflecting the team's commitment to assembly the sprint objectives efficiently.
Fig 4.3 Graph of remaining effort and ideal trend wrt sprint 3
Sprint 4
In Sprint 4, the very last sprint of our mission, we successfully finished the last two backlog
tasks. This sprint targeted on final testing and refining the model to make sure the most
fulfilling overall performance. The burndown chart for Sprint 4 reflects the completion of all
remaining tasks, marking the successful closure of the task.
Fig 4.4 Graph of remaining effort and ideal trend wrt sprint 4
The first step in our Data preprocessing procedure turned into data exploration,
which allowed us to build a thorough information of the dataset and its structure. This
section is vital in any machine learning project because it presents insights into the
attributes, the rows, and the Data types, which helps in determining how to handle each
feature during the subsequent stages of preprocessing.
We started by means of examining the fundamental shape of the dataset. Using the
df.Head() function, we displayed the first few rows to take a look at the content of every
attribute. This gave us a preliminary impact of ways the records changed into organized
and the kind of values present in each column. By visually examining the first few rows,
we may want to identify key capabilities such as temperature, wind speed, and humidity,
together with our goal variable, RainTomorrow, which we aimed to predict.
Next, we used the df.Data() feature to achieve more distinct facts about the dataset, which
includes the overall wide variety of rows and attributes, the statistics kinds of each
characteristic. This step become crucial as it helped us become aware of missing Data
points, inconsistencies, and data quality issues. Knowing whether an attribute turned into
numerical or categorical will help the preprocess the data later. We observed that the dataset
contained 145,460 rows and 23 attributes, with a mix of numerical, categorical, and
continuous features.
To enhance our understanding of the data, we constructed various graphs and
visualizations, which helped us identify patterns, trends, and anomalies. Visual exploration
through histograms, box plots, and bar charts allowed us to observe the distribution of
numerical features and detect potential outliers or skewed data. For example, using box
plots helped us detect unusual values in features like Rainfall and WindGustSpeed. We also
employed heatmaps to examine correlations between different numerical attributes, which
provided insights into relationships that could influence the performance of our predictive
model.
By conducting this comprehensive data exploration, we laid a strong foundation for the
next stages of the preprocessing process. It allowed us to understand the dataset's overall
structure and highlighted the areas that needed further cleaning and refinement, ensuring
that we had a solid grasp of the data before moving on to more technical transformations.
• Discrete Features: Discrete features are numerical attributes that take on a restrained
range of distinct values. In our dataset, we recognized 2 discrete capabilities:
o Cloud9am
o Cloud3pm
These attributes constitute the fraction of the sky obscured by using clouds at 9 AM
and 3 PM, respectively. They are measured in "oktas" (eighths) and might only
tackle values from 0 (absolutely clear sky) to 8 (completely overcast). Since those
values are countable and not non-stop, they fall into the discrete category.
• Continuous Features: Continuous features are numerical variables which can take
on any price inside a range and are regularly measured records. Our dataset
contained 14 continuous functions, which might be critical for understanding the
variation in weather situations. These features encompass:
o MinTemp: Minimum temperature in degrees Celsius.
o MaxTemp: Maximum temperature in degrees Celsius.
o Rainfall: The amount of rainfall in millimeters.
o Evaporation: Class A pan evaporation in millimeters.
o Sunshine: Hours of shiny sunshine at some point of the day.
o WindGustSpeed: Speed of the strongest wind gust inside the 24
hours before middle of the night.
o WindSpeed9am and WindSpeed3pm: Wind speeds averaged over
10 mins before nine AM and three PM, respectively.
o Humidity9am and Humidity3pm: Humidity chances at nine AM
and three PM.
o Pressure9am and Pressure3pm: Atmospheric pressure in hPa at 9
AM and 3 PM.
o Temp9am and Temp3pm: Temperature at nine AM and 3 PM.
In summary, feature classification was essential to ensure that the attributes were treated
correctly in the preprocessing steps, thus improving the overall quality of the dataset and
enabling us to train a more accurate machine learning model.
or unrecorded observations. If not addressed nicely, lacking values can significantly affect
the performance of model getting to know fashions, main to inaccurate predictions, biases,
or maybe model failure.
In our dataset, we encountered missing values in several attributes. To address this
difficulty, we began via figuring out the wide variety of missing values for each
characteristic the use of the following function:
• df.Isnull().Sum()
Once the missing values were identified, we applied appropriate imputation techniques to
handle them effectively:
• Numerical features, such as temperature, rainfall, wind speed, and pressure, are
continuous variables, and missing values in these features can distort the overall
statistical properties of the dataset. To handle this, we imputed the missing values
with the mean of the respective feature. Imputing the mean ensures that the central
tendency of the data remains unchanged, allowing the model to perform accurately
without any major shifts in the feature distributions.
• Categorical features, such as the direction of the wind or location, cannot be filled
using statistical measures like the mean. For these features, we opted to impute
random values based on the most frequent or plausible category within the dataset.
This method helps retain the diversity and variability in the categorical data, without
introducing bias or favoring a particular category excessively.
• Data Integrity: Missing values distort the dataset's basic shape, decreasing
its reliability. Without addressing them, the dataset may no longer
appropriately represent the underlying phenomena being studied, leading to
wrong insights.
Outliers can negatively affect the performance of the CatBoost algorithm as it relies
on accurate data distributions to make predictions. Outliers skew these distributions, leading
to potential misclassification or errors in prediction accuracy. Removing or adjusting
outliers ensures a more robust and reliable model by maintaining the integrity of the data.
In this step, we plotted a box plot to visualize the distribution of data and detect the presence
of outliers. Outliers are values that significantly differ from the rest of the dataset, often
lying beyond the interquartile range (IQR).
To remove the outliers, we applied the Interquartile Range (IQR) method. This method
identifies outliers as values lying below the lower bridge or above the upper bridge of the
data.
The mathematical process for outlier detection and removal follows these steps:
• IQR = Q3−Q1
• Lower Bridge = Q1−1.5×IQR
• Upper Bridge = Q3+1.5×IQR
Any data points fall below the lower bridge or above the upper bridge are considered
outliers. These values are removed for the better performance of the model.
• fit(): When fit() is applied, the encoder learns the unique categories present in the
column and assigns each category a numerical value. For example, if the categorical
values are ['Location', 'WindGustDir'], fit() identifies these distinct labels and maps
them to integers like:
'Location' → 2
'WindGustDir' → 13
This step builds the internal mapping from the unique categories to numerical
values.
• transform(): After the encoder has learned the mapping during fit(), transform()
applies this mapping to the dataset, converting the categorical values into their
corresponding numerical labels. With the above example, if we apply transform()
to the attribute, it will replace each 'Location' and 'WindGustDir' with 2 and 13
respectively.
• fit_transform(): The fit_transform() method combines both steps. It first fits the
encoder by identifying the unique categories and then transforms the data in a single
step. This saves time by applying both processes simultaneously.
In the Feature Selection step of our rain prediction project, we targeted on deciding
on taking the most relevant functions for training the model. This procedure facilitates to
improving the version's overall performance and reducing computational complexity.
To identify the relationships among the different attributes in our dataset, we built a
correlation heatmap. The heatmap visually represented how strongly each function turned
into correlated with the target variable in addition to with each other.
In this analysis:
• Positive correlation means when the one attribute increases, the other also tends to
increase.
• Negative correlation means when the one attribute increases, the other tends to
decrease.
We analysed both positive and negative correlations to determine which features had a
meaningful impact on predicting rainfall. Through this analysis, we found that the attribute
'Date' was the least correlated with the target variable. Since 'Date' did not provide any
significant contribution to the model's predictive power, we decided to drop this column
from the dataset.
All other attributes, which showed stronger correlations, were retained and used for training
the model. This feature selection process helped streamline our data, ensuring that only the
most relevant information was passed into the model, enhancing its accuracy and
efficiency.
We used a way that effectively splits the dataset, making sure that this division is done
continuously each time by means of setting a fixed random seed. This consistency ensures
that the results are dependable and reproducible in the course of assessment.
CHAPTER 5
MODEL SELECTION
Random Forest is one of the powerful ensemble learning algorithms known for its wide
usage in classification and regression problems. It is ideal in complicated datasets such as
in weather forecasting because it develops a multitude of decision trees that improve the
precision in the prediction of rain and other weather patterns. The following are some
advantages in using Random Forest for the prediction of weather patterns like rain:
High accuracy out-of-the-box and relatively less hyperparameter tuning compared with
many complex models; thus, Random Forest is beneficial for weather forecasting because
datasets could be really large and diverse.
Efficiency and Scalability: Random Forests are computationally intensive but very
scalable and can be parallelized. Therefore, they can easily process large weather datasets
even in real-time applications.
The basic idea of this algorithm, in the context of rainfall prediction, is to generate a forest
of decision trees. Each decision tree was trained on a random subset of the features (e.g.,
temperature, humidity, and pressure) as well as the target variable (rain or no rain). At time
of prediction, each of the decision trees independently voted on how likely it believed it
was that it was going to rain, and the decision was made as a majority vote across all trees.
5.1 Algorithm
Collect historical weather data with relevant features and a label indicating whether it
rained or not. Make sure to preprocess for missing values and features that are irrelevant to
the study.
Train multiple decision trees on some randomly selected subset of data. Feature bagging
takes the form of random selection of features per tree; data bagging is presented as
bootstrapping the samples for each tree.
For unseen data, each decision tree predicts (rain or not). The Random Forest calculates
the final prediction by tallying up the predictions for each tree through majority vote.
The performance of the model is evaluated using test data on criteria such as accuracy,
precision, recall, and a confusion matrix on determining its discrimination between the
presence of rainfall and no rainfall.
In summary, Random Forest is a powerful predictor of rain that can model nonlinear
relationships in weather data while providing insight into feature importance. Its ensemble
approach reduces overfitting and makes use of many predictors to increase stability,
making it a good candidate for meteorological forecasting applications.
CHAPTER 6
MODEL EVALUATION
A trained model is applied on new data to estimate results based on learned relationships
between variables gathered through historical data. In this rain fall prediction, we used the
Random Forest model with a specific train on data including 23 attributes and 145,460
rows from historical rainfall.
Before doing the model train and the evaluation, the dataset split into two data sets through
the 80:20 approach. This resulted in 116,368 rows being applied in training and 29,092
rows for testing. We applied the major portion of the data to make sure that our model
understood the underlying pattern in the data. To implement this, we used the testing dataset
by including 20% of the total dataset, which was 29,092 rows that were not used while
training.
During the prediction stage, the trained Random Forest model applies all of those
relationships to the testing data set and generates the output, for which a prediction
regarding the likelihoods of occurring rainfall can be taken about that particular time frame.
It takes features like temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure, in a given input for
which it also makes the prediction for that day to rain or not.
The predictions can now be compared with actual observations of rainfall to determine their
effectiveness, which in return will evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the model.
Metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC can be applied so that performance
can be gauged and a complete perspective of how well the model predicts rainfall can be
produced.
techniques: Confusion Matrix, Classification Report, and AUC (Area Under the Curve).
Here are the details of each technique used in our Random Forest model below:
The confusion matrix is a performance measure of the classification problem, primarily the
binary classification. The matrix shows actual target values compared to predicted ones and
can show any of the four possible outcomes that follow:
[[20685 1947]
[ 2455 4005]]
True Positives (TP): 4005 — Predicted correctly with rain
True Negatives (TN): 20685 — Predicted correctly without rain
False Positives (FP): 1947 — Predicted with rain incorrectly
False Negatives (FN): 2455 — Missed predicting rain
The classification report provides significant metrics that can be used in order to evaluate
the quality of the model's prediction, especially for each class. Some of the most critical
metrics included in the report are as follows:
• Precision
Precision measures the accuracy of the positive predictions. It indicates how many
of the predicted positive cases were actually positive.
Precision = TP / (TP + FP)
• Recall
Recall (or Sensitivity) measures the ability of the model to identify all relevant
instances. It indicates how many of the actual positive cases were predicted
correctly.
Recall (Sensitivity) = TP / (TP + FN)
• F1-Score
The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall. It provides a single score
that balances both precision and recall, especially useful when dealing with
imbalanced datasets.
F1 Score = 2((Precision × Recall) / (Precision + Recall))
• Accuracy
Accuracy measures the overall correctness of the model, indicating the proportion
of total correct predictions (both positive and negative) out of all predictions made.
Accuracy = TP+TN / (TP+TN+FP+FN)
The classification report provides critical information regarding the performance of the
model as it is measured with various metrics, including precision, recall, F1-score, and
accuracy. All of these metrics are very crucial for proper assessment and then selecting the
model, mainly because of the application for the task of rain prediction. For this task, there
are two classifications of relevance: positive (rain) and negative (no-rain).
CHAPTER 7
CONCLUSION
This project has been successfully developed based on an ML-based Rain Prediction
System using the Random Forest algorithm with an accuracy level of 85%. The model can
accurately predict occurrences of rainfall based on diverse meteorological features from
analysis of historical weather data. This system may benefit key stakeholders in this
respect, such as governments, farmers, and urban planners, by improving agricultural
planning and management of resources.
The set of data preprocessing steps have been utilized to ensure a good quality and accuracy
model. Missing values were addressed through mean imputation to numerical features and
random imputation for categorical variables while the outliers were managed with the help
of an IQR method. The process of Label Encoding helped converting the categorical data
into numbers and thereby ensuring that a model can support diverse kinds of data.
Improving accuracy, because accurate forecasts can critically affect agricultural planning
and resource management of water, helping people make better decisions. A higher
accuracy builds trust to be used more widely with applications in real-world projects,
thereby reducing economic damages from unexpected weather conditions, so that the
community is ultimately better prepared and resilient to such conditions.
Trees: More trees may result in better models, but this will cost more in computation.
Max Depth: Max depth is used to adjust the model's complexity and interpretability.
Min Samples Split and Min Samples Leaf: Min samples for split and leaf nodes can be
used to prevent overfitting.
Max Features: Different numbers of features that could be used in each split might
improve accuracy and prevent overfitting.
7.1.2 Cross-Validation
Using cross-validation is used to evaluate how well the model performs so that the best
parameters would be chosen such that consistent results will be obtained irrespective of
which subset of the data is used.
In conclusion, Random Forest is a powerful and interpretable option for rainfall prediction,
and with a focus on hyperparameter tuning and further feature refinement, there is potential
to further improve accuracy and model performance.
CHAPTER 8
REFERENCES