3-16-2019

The Ratio Test and the Root Test

The Ratio Test tests a series for convergence or divergence by considering the limit of successive terms.
It is an important test: For example, it’s frequently used in finding the interval of convergence of power
series.
∞
X
Theorem. (Ratio Test) Let ak be a series with positive terms. Let
k=1

ak+1
L = lim .
k→∞ ak

(a) If L < 1, the series converges.

(b) If L > 1, the series diverges.

(c) If L = 1, the test fails.

The reason the test works is that, in the limit, the series looks like a geometric series with ratio L. You
can see that the inequalities for L resemble the inequalities that tell when a geometric series with (positive)
ratio r converges or diverges.

The proof will use the following result on sequences: An increasing sequence that is bounded above has
a limit.

Proof. I’ll consider the case L < 1 by way of example. Choose a positive number ǫ so r = L + ǫ < 1. For n
sufficiently large,
an+1 an+2
, , . . . < r.
an an+1
These inequalities give
an+1 < ran ,
an+2 < ran+1 < r2 an ,
an+3 < ran+2 < r3 an ,
..
.
Adding the inequalities yields

an+1 + an+2 + an+3 + · · · < ran + r2 an + r3 an + · · · .

The right side is a convergent geometric series. The inequality shows that its sum is an upper bound
for the partial sums of the series on the left. The partial sums form an increasing sequence that is bounded
X∞
above, so they have a limit — that is, the series on the left converges. Hence, the original series ak
k=1
converges, since it’s just
(a1 + a2 + · · · + an ) + an+1 + an+2 + an+3 + · · · .
This is a finite number (a1 + a2 + · · · + an ) plus the series an+1 + an+2 + an+3 + · · ·, which I know
converges.
A similar argument works if L > 1.

When do you use the Ratio Test? Ratios are fractions, and they tend to simplify nicely if the top and
bottom contain products or powers. For example, if the nth term of the series contains factorials, you ought
to give the Ratio Test serious consideration.

1
 ∞
X 1
Example. Does converge or diverge?
k!
k=1

I’ll approach this example as if it didn’t appear in a discussion of the Ratio Test. What do you do?
The Zero Limit Test is easy to apply. However,
1
lim = 0.
k→∞ k!
Hence, the Zero Limit Test fails.
The series is not geometric, and it’s not a p-series.
The Integral Test is inapplicable. What would f (x) = x! mean as a continuous function? How would
you integrate it?
It’s possible to apply a comparison test; do you see how?
The Ratio Test is probably the easiest way to show that this series converges. One indication that the
Ratio Test is worth trying is that n! is a product. The Ratio Test works well with products and powers,
ak+1
because cancellation may occur when you form .
ak
Form the ratio of successive terms:
1
ak+1 (k + 1)! k! 1 · 2 · ··· · k 1
= = = = .
ak 1 (k + 1)! 1 · 2 · · · · · k · (k + 1) k+1
k!
Take the limit as k → ∞:
1
lim = 0.
k→∞ k+1
The limit is less than 1. The series converges, by the Ratio Test.

∞
X (2n + 1)!
Example. Does converge or diverge?
n=1
5n (n!)2

First, note that (2n + 1)! is the product of the numbers from 1 to 2n + 1:

(2n + 1)! = 1 · 2 · 3 · · · · · (2n)(2n + 1).

For example, if n = 3, 2n + 1 = 7, and

(2n + 1)! = 7! = 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7.

I’ll apply the Ratio Test. Note that if I replace n with n + 1 in 2n + 1, I get 2(n + 1) + 1 = 2n + 3. So I
have
(2n + 3)!
5n+1 ((n + 1)!)2 (2n + 3)! 5n (n!)2 (2n + 3)! 5n (n!)2
lim = lim n+1 2
= lim · n+1 · .
n→∞ (2n + 1)! n→∞ 5 ((n + 1)!) (2n + 1)! n→∞ (2n + 1)! 5 ((n + 1)!)2
5n (n!)2

I’ll stop for a second and show the details of the next simplification:

(2n + 3)! (1)(2) · · · (2n)(2n + 1)(2n + 2)(2n + 3)

= = (2n + 2)(2n + 3),
(2n + 1)! (1)(2) · · · (2n)(2n + 1)

5n 1
= ,
5n+1 5

2
 2 2
(n!)2
 
n! (1)(2) · · · (n) 1
= = = .
((n + 1)!)2 (n + 1)! (1)(2) · · · (n)(n + 1) (n + 1)2
Thus, my limit is   
1 1 2·2 4
lim (2n + 2)(2n + 3) 2
= = .
n→∞ 5 (n + 1) 5 5
The limiting ratio is less than 1, so the series converges by the Ratio Test.

∞
X
Example. Does arctan e−k converge or diverge?
k=1

lim arctan e−k = arctan 0 = 0.

k→∞

The Zero Limit Test fails.

The series is not geometric, and it’s not a p-series. I don’t think you’d want to integrate arctan e−x !
And it’s not clear how to do this using a comparison.
Form the ratio of successive terms:

ak+1 arctan e−(k+1)

= .
ak arctan e−k

Take the limit as k → ∞:

−e−(k+1)
arctan e −(k+1)
e−2k + 1 e−(k+1) e−2k + 1
= lim 1 + e −k
−2(k+1)
lim = lim −2(k+1) · = e−1 · lim −2(k+1) = e−1 .
k→∞ arctan e−k k→∞ −e k→∞ e +1 e −k k→∞ e +1
1 + e−2k

Since e−1 < 1, the series converges, by the Ratio Test.

∞
X 2n2 + 5
Example. Does the series converge or diverge?
n=1
n4 + 1

What happens if I try to use the Ratio Test? The limiting ratio is

2(n + 1)2 + 5
(n + 1)4 + 1 2(n + 1)2 + 5 n4 + 1 2(n + 1)2 + 5 n4 + 1
lim = lim = lim = 1 · 1 = 1.
n→∞ 2n2 + 5 n→∞ (n + 1)4 + 1 2n2 + 5 n→∞ 2n2 + 5 (n + 1)4 + 1
n4 + 1

The Ratio Test fails.

In general, the Ratio Test will fail if the general term is a rational function.
2n2 + 5 2n2 2
In this case, limit comparison is a better choice. Since ≈ = 2 , I’ll compare the given
n4 + 1 n4 n
∞
X 2
series to :
n=1
n2
2n2 + 5
4 2n2 + 5 n2 2n4 + 5n2
lim n + 1 = lim 4 · = lim = 1.
n→∞ 2 n→∞ n + 1 2 n→∞ 2n4 + 2
n2

3
 ∞
X 2
The limit is a finite positive number. 2
converges, since it’s a p-series with p = 2 > 1. Hence, the
n=1
n
original series converges by Limit Comparison.

The Root Test is similar to the Ratio Test. Instead of taking the limit of successive quotients of terms,
you take the limit of the k th root of the k th term.
∞
X
Theorem. (Root Test) Let ak be a series with positive terms. Let
k=1

√
L = lim k
ak .
k→∞

(a) If L < 1, the series converges.

(b) If L > 1, the series diverges.

(c) If L = 1, the test fails.

Informally, the test works for the same reason that the Ratio Test works — namely, when k is large,
√
k ak ≈ L, so ak ≈ Lk . This says that the series is approximately geometric for large k, so it converges if the
ratio L is less than 1 and diverges if the ratio L is greater than 1.

Proof. I’ll sketch a proof in the case where L > 1. So suppose

√
lim k
ak = L > 1.
k→∞

√
I want to show that the series diverges. Pick a number r such that L > r > 1. Then lim k
ak = L
k→∞
√
means that I can find a number n so that if k ≥ n I have k ak > r, or ak > rk . Then

an > r n
an + an+1 > rn + rn+1
an + an+1 + an+2 > rn + rn+1 + rn+2
..
.

∞
X
That is, the partial sums of the series ak are each greater than the corresponding partial sums of
k=n
∞
X ∞
X
k
r . But the series rk is a divergent geometric series, since r > 1. Therefore, its partial sums go to
k=n k=n
∞
X ∞
X
∞, and hence the partial sums of ak go to ∞ as well. So ak diverges, which means the original series
k=n k=n
∞
X
ak diverges.
k=1

∞ √
X 3k
Example. Does the series converge or diverge?
2k
k=1
s√
√ √
k 3k 3 3
lim = lim = < 1.
k→∞ 2k k→∞ 2 2

4
 The series converges, by the Root Test.

∞  n
X 3n 1
Example. Does the series 2e−n + − cos converge or diverge?
n=3
n+1 n

Apply the Root Test:

 n 1/n  
3n 1 3n 1
lim 2e−n + − cos = lim 2e−n + − cos = 0 + 3 − 1 = 2 > 1.
n→∞ n+1 n n→∞ n+1 n

The series diverges by the Root Test.

∞
X 5n
Example. Does the series converge or diverge?
n=1
n!

In this case, the Root Test would probably not be a good choice. Why? Because I’d have (n!)1/n on
the bottom, and I don’t see an easy way to compute the limit of that expression.
Instead, the factorial suggests using the Ratio Test. The limiting ratio is

5n+1
(n + 1)! 5n+1 n! 5n+1 n! 5
lim n = lim = lim = lim = 0.
n→∞ 5 n→∞ (n + 1)! 5n n→∞ 5n (n + 1)! n→∞ n + 1
n!
Since the limiting ratio is less than 1, the series converges by the Ratio Test.

∞
X 2n
Example. Does the series converge or diverge?
n=1
3n

Take the nth root of the nth term:

1/n
(2n)1/n

2n
= .
3n 3

(2n)1/n
I need to compute lim . I’ll compute the limit of the top.
n→∞ 3
1/n
Let y = (2n) . Then
ln 2n
ln y = ln(2n)1/n = .
n
Hence,
2
ln 2n 2n
lim ln y = lim = lim = 0.
n→∞ n→∞ n n→∞ 1

Hence,
lim (2n)1/n = lim y = e0 = 1.
n→∞ n→∞

Therefore,
(2n)1/n 1
lim = .
n→∞ 3 3
The limiting ratio is less than 1. Hence, the series converges, by the Root Test.