THEORY OF STATE

Aristotle’s Theory of the State is a foundational concept in political philosophy, laying out his vision of a
state that serves the purpose of enabling its citizens to lead virtuous and fulfilling lives. Rooted in his
broader philosophy, Aristotle saw the state as a natural institution, one that is integral to the
development of human potential. His theories, outlined primarily in Politics, explore the nature of the
state, its formation, structure, and purpose. Let’s break down the core elements of Aristotle’s theory.

1. The State as a Natural Institution

Aristotle believed that the state exists by nature and is fundamental to human life. In his view, humans
are "political animals," meaning they naturally seek association with others in communities to thrive and
achieve their fullest potential. This communal living ultimately evolves from the household (the smallest
unit) to the village, and finally to the polis, or state.
 Example: Aristotle would argue that the formation of city-states in ancient Greece was a natural
evolution of human society. As individuals formed households, then villages, these groups
eventually united into larger entities for greater security, resource sharing, and cultural
development, resulting in city-states like Athens and Sparta.

Stage Description Example

Household Basic family unit, led by a male head Family unit in ancient Greece
Village Group of households united for basic needs Small Greek village societies
Polis (State) Full political organization enabling a good life City-state of Athens

2. The Purpose of the State: Achieving the Good Life

For Aristotle, the state’s ultimate purpose is to foster the "good life"—a life of virtue and moral
development. He believed that while households and villages serve to meet basic survival needs, the
state exists to provide an environment in which people can achieve eudaimonia, or human flourishing.
The state does this by cultivating a society where citizens are encouraged and enabled to act virtuously.
Unlike smaller social units, the state can create laws, promote education, and instill moral values in
citizens.
 Example: Aristotle’s ideal state might resemble Athens at its height, where institutions
promoted philosophy, civic engagement, and arts, allowing citizens to reach their potential.

Social Unit Primary Purpose State Example

Household Meeting survival needs Family structure
Village Basic social and economic cooperation Greek agricultural communities
State (Polis) Enabling citizens to lead virtuous lives Athens with its focus on civic duty and arts

3. Citizenship and Virtue

In Aristotle’s view, not everyone in society qualifies as a citizen. He reserves citizenship for those who
actively participate in the state’s political and judicial functions, such as decision-making and law
formation. According to him, a citizen must not only understand virtue but also act upon it to contribute
positively to the state’s collective good. Therefore, a state’s strength is closely tied to the virtue of its
citizens, as virtuous citizens will uphold justice and contribute to the state's harmony and stability.
 Example: In Aristotle’s ideal state, Athenian men who could participate in the Assembly were
considered true citizens. In contrast, slaves, women, and non-Greeks, who did not participate in
political life, were excluded from citizenship.

1
 Role Eligibility for Citizenship Reason
Men (Freeborn) Qualified (if virtuous and engaged) They can participate in politics
Women Not citizens Limited to household roles
Slaves Not citizens Viewed as property, not individuals
Foreigners Not citizens Not integrated into state affairs

4. Types of Government
Aristotle classified governments based on two criteria: the number of rulers and whether they ruled for
the common good or their own interests. He identified six forms of government, three of which are
“ideal” or positive and three “deviant.” The ideal forms prioritize the common good, while the deviant
forms are characterized by rulers’ self-interest.
 Monarchy (Ideal): Rule by one for the common good
 Aristocracy (Ideal): Rule by the few, where rulers are selected based on virtue
 Polity (Ideal): Rule by many, typically a mixed constitution where the middle class holds power
 Tyranny (Deviant): Rule by one for personal gain
 Oligarchy (Deviant): Rule by a few wealthy individuals for their own benefit
 Democracy (Deviant): Rule by the majority, often leading to mob rule rather than rational
governance
Form of Government Ideal/Deviant Ruler Count Primary Goal Example
Monarchy Ideal One Common good Benevolent King
Tyranny Deviant One Ruler’s interest Dictator
Aristocracy Ideal Few Common good, virtue-driven Philosopher rulers
Oligarchy Deviant Few Wealthy elite's interests Rule by aristocrats
Polity Ideal Many Balance of interests Mixed constitution
Democracy Deviant Many Majority’s interest Athens under mob rule

5. The Middle Class as a Stabilizing Force

Aristotle’s theory of the state highlights the importance of a strong middle class. He argued that states
with a large, stable middle class tend to be more balanced and less prone to internal conflict. The middle
class, being neither excessively wealthy nor poor, provides a moderating force within the state and can
help prevent the government from devolving into oligarchy or democracy’s mob rule. Aristotle felt that
the middle class’s economic stability allows them to focus on virtue and rational governance, making
them ideal for a polity, or a “mixed” government.
 Example: Aristotle observed that in Athens and other Greek city-states, when the middle class
was strong and politically active, society experienced fewer extreme shifts in power compared
to states with stark wealth disparities.

Class Influence on Stability Reason

Wealthy (Upper Class) Potential for oligarchy Wealth can lead to power consolidation
Middle Class Stabilizing force Balanced interests, moderation
Lower Class Potential for democracy/mob rule Economic struggles fuel populism

6. Aristotle’s Vision vs. Modern Interpretations

Aristotle’s concept of the state has both timeless insights and limitations. His emphasis on the role of
virtue, community, and the natural evolution of the state is widely respected. However, modern values

2
often clash with his exclusionary views on citizenship, given his belief that women, slaves, and non-
Greeks should not participate in political life. Today, democratic states aspire to uphold values like
equality and inclusivity, even though Aristotle’s belief in rule for the “common good” remains influential.

Aristotle’s Views Modern Interpretation

Limited Citizenship Expanded, inclusive citizenship
Focus on Virtue and Common Good Continued emphasis, though broader defined
Middle-Class Stability Strong middle class remains valued

Aristotle’s Theory of the State provides a blueprint for understanding the function and structure of
society. His insights into the natural evolution of communities, the importance of virtue, and the stability
offered by the middle class continue to inspire political thought. Although some aspects of his theory are
at odds with contemporary values, Aristotle’s belief in the state as a force for moral and societal
improvement is a cornerstone of Western political philosophy.

BEST PRACTICABLE STATE

Aristotle’s concept of the “best practicable state” reflects his pragmatic approach to political philosophy,
focusing on the idea that the best state is one that balances idealism with real-world feasibility. Unlike
Plato, who envisioned a utopian “Republic” led by philosopher-kings, Aristotle believed that the best

3
state must consider existing societal conditions, including the resources, people, and values of a given
society. The best practicable state, according to Aristotle, is one that enables its citizens to live virtuously
and ensures stability by aligning with the nature and capacities of the people within it.
This concept is central to Aristotle’s political theory, as he acknowledges that a state designed without
consideration of its citizens’ capabilities would ultimately fail. His practical idealism is brightly presented
in his work Politics, where he examines different forms of government and argues for a balanced
approach that supports both virtue and stability.

Key Characteristics of the “Best Practicable State”

Aristotle’s “best practicable state” is shaped by several essential characteristics, which he believes can
enable citizens to lead a virtuous and fulfilling life. These characteristics are rooted in balance and
practicality rather than perfection, aiming to create a state that is achievable and stable.
1. Mixed Constitution: The best practicable state, according to Aristotle, is one that combines
elements of democracy, oligarchy, and aristocracy. This balance helps prevent any single class
from dominating the others and reduces the risk of tyranny or mob rule. A mixed constitution
means power is shared among different groups, allowing both the wealthy and the common
people to have a stake in governance. This fosters social harmony and stability, as each group
feels represented.
2. Strong Middle Class: Aristotle emphasizes that a stable state must have a robust middle class.
The middle class acts as a stabilizing force, balancing the interests of the wealthy elite and the
poorer citizens. He believed that extreme wealth disparities lead to social unrest, with the
wealthy pushing for oligarchy and the poor advocating for radical democracy. A strong middle
class helps maintain balance and serves as a moderating influence on the government.
3. Rule of Law: Aristotle’s ideal state is governed by laws rather than by individuals. By
emphasizing the rule of law, Aristotle argued that laws represent reason and fairness, helping to
prevent corruption and favoritism. A lawful state ensures that citizens are treated justly, and
leaders are held accountable, which promotes a sense of trust and stability among the people.
4. Virtuous Citizenship: In the best practicable state, citizens are encouraged and educated to act
virtuously. For Aristotle, the goal of the state is not just to enforce order but to create an
environment where citizens can develop morally and intellectually. Therefore, the state should
promote civic education and ethical behavior, cultivating a citizenry that values the common
good over personal gain.

Characteristic Description Reason for Stability

Mixed Constitution Blends democracy, and oligarchy Prevents dominance by any single class
Strong Middle Class Middle class as balancing force Reduces wealth-driven social tensions
Rule of Law Laws govern rather than individuals Ensures fairness and accountability
Virtuous Citizenship Emphasis on moral and civic education Fosters unity and commitment to the state

Mixed Constitution in Practice

Aristotle believed that a mixed constitution would combine the best aspects of different types of
governance. In a pure democracy, the majority might oppress the minority, while an oligarchy could
result in the wealthy exploiting the poor. A mixed constitution, by balancing these interests, aims to
create a fairer and more stable political system.
 Example: Aristotle’s ideal mixed constitution resembles the governance of ancient Sparta, which
combined elements of monarchy (two kings), aristocracy (the council of elders), and democracy

4
 (the assembly of Spartan citizens). This blend allowed different classes and factions to feel
included in governance, promoting loyalty and stability.

Type of Government Role in Mixed Constitution Example from Ancient Sparta

Monarchy One leader or ruling figure Two kings with military control
Aristocracy Council of elite or virtuous Council of elders (Gerousia)
Democracy Assembly for citizen voting Assembly of Spartan citizens

Importance of the Middle Class

Aristotle considered the middle class to be the backbone of the best practicable state. A strong middle
class mitigates the risks of conflict between the wealthy and the poor, acting as a stabilizing force. He
observed that when the middle class is substantial, society is less likely to experience revolutions or
extreme shifts in power, as the middle class serves as a bridge between extremes.
 Example: Aristotle would have considered Athens’ middle class—a blend of craftsmen, traders,
and small landholders—as a stabilizing force in its democracy. This middle class contributed
significantly to Athens’ success, participating actively in political life and balancing the interests
of the wealthy elite and the lower-class laborers.

Social Class Role in State Stability Example

Wealthy Elite Can push for oligarchy, but should be balanced Wealthy landowners in Athens
Middle Class Provides balance between rich and poor Athenian craftsmen and traders
Poor Pushes for democracy, but balanced by middle Lower-class citizens in Athens

Rule of Law: Laws Over Individuals

The best practicable state, according to Aristotle, prioritizes laws over individual rule. He believed that
when laws govern, rather than individuals, decisions are made based on reason rather than personal
bias. Laws should serve as a framework for justice, ensuring that citizens are treated fairly and that
leaders are held accountable to the same standards as everyone else.
 Example: In Aristotle’s view, Athens’ legal reforms under leaders like Solon contributed to a
more stable society. By establishing laws that were applied consistently, Athens reduced
arbitrary rule and gained the citizens’ trust, laying the groundwork for its democratic system.

Governance Type Characteristics Outcome

Rule by Law Decisions are made according to laws Ensures justice, limits corruption
Rule by Individuals Decisions can be arbitrary or biased Higher risk of corruption

Promoting Virtuous Citizenship

Aristotle argued that a state’s highest purpose is to cultivate virtue among its citizens. The best
practicable state thus invests in the moral and intellectual education of its people. According to him,
when citizens are virtuous, they are more likely to work towards the common good and resist selfish or
harmful behavior.
For this reason, Aristotle emphasized civic education that teaches values like justice, moderation, and
courage. He believed that a well-educated populace would be more capable of governing wisely and
fairly, ensuring the state’s long-term stability.
 Example: In Sparta, for instance, citizens were educated from a young age in military discipline,
communal loyalty, and civic duty. Although Sparta’s focus was more on military virtue than

5
 Aristotle would have preferred, it demonstrated the role of civic education in building a
cohesive, loyal society.

Virtue Purpose in State Example in Spartan Education

Justice Ensures fairness and equality Spartan loyalty to the common good
Moderation Avoids excess and promotes balance Spartan training in simplicity
Courage Encourages protection of the state Spartan focus on military discipline

Limitations of Aristotle’s Best Practicable State

While Aristotle’s concept of the best practicable state offers a realistic framework, it does have
limitations. Aristotle’s exclusion of certain groups from political life, such as women, slaves, and non-
citizens, contradicts modern ideals of equality. His emphasis on virtue, while noble, can also be
challenging to implement in diverse societies where values and beliefs may differ. Additionally, achieving
a stable middle class and a balanced constitution requires careful economic and social policies, which
are not always feasible.

Limitations Description
Exclusionary Citizenship Limits participation based on class/gender
High Ideal of Virtue Difficult to implement universally
Dependency on Middle Class Requires economic stability, not always achievable

Aristotle’s “best practicable state” is a vision of balanced, virtuous governance that combines ideals with
practical considerations. His ideas on mixed government, the stabilizing influence of the middle class,
the rule of law, and the cultivation of virtuous citizens have deeply influenced political thought.
Although Aristotle’s vision is rooted in ancient Greek society, its emphasis on balance, inclusivity within
reason, and the rule of law offers enduring lessons for modern governance, highlighting the complex
relationship between idealism and reality in building a stable state.

THEORY OF REVOLUTION
Aristotle’s Theory of Revolution is a profound analysis of why states experience political instability and
how they can avoid the pitfalls of revolution. Aristotle recognized that societies, particularly city-states
in ancient Greece, are vulnerable to upheaval when social and political tensions escalate. His theory, as
outlined in Politics, focuses on the causes of revolutions, the conditions that make a state more or less
stable, and the remedies for preventing political disorder. In essence, Aristotle views revolutions as

6
shifts in political power—whether from one type of government to another (e.g., democracy to
oligarchy) or within a single type of government.

Key Causes of Revolution

Aristotle identified several primary causes of revolution, rooted in human nature and social dynamics.
These causes can broadly be divided into inequality, grievances, and ambition for power. He observed
that revolutions often occur when people feel they are unfairly treated, are denied political
representation, or are not adequately rewarded for their contributions.
1. Inequality and Injustice: Aristotle argued that perceptions of inequality, particularly regarding
wealth and political representation, can fuel resentment and lead to revolution. When citizens
believe they are treated unjustly or are excluded from political influence, they are more likely to
revolt. This dissatisfaction is particularly acute among groups that feel economically or politically
marginalized, such as the poor in an oligarchic state or the wealthy in a democracy.
2. Grievances and Grudges: Social and economic grievances play a significant role in fueling
revolutionary sentiment. Aristotle notes that when people perceive policies as unfair, or if they
feel humiliated by the ruling class, they may channel their frustration into calls for political
change. Such grievances often accumulate over time, leading to a boiling point.
3. Ambition and Power Struggles: Ambition among powerful individuals or factions within the
state can destabilize the government. Aristotle noted that influential citizens or groups may seek
to increase their power at the expense of others, leading to factionalism. When powerful figures
or groups feel they lack control over governance, they may resort to revolutionary means to
achieve it.

Cause of Revolution Description Example

Poor citizens revolting in oligarchic
Inequality and Injustice Disparity in wealth, rights, or power
societies
Grievances and Accumulation of social or economic Citizens' resentment over harsh
Complaints frustrations taxation policies
Ambition and Power Competition among powerful figures Nobles competing for influence in
Struggles for control monarchies

Types of Revolution According to Aristotle

Aristotle also categorizes revolutions based on their goals and outcomes. He identifies two main types:
1. Complete Revolution (Change of Constitution): This occurs when a government is overthrown,
and a new form of government is established. For example, a democracy might become an
oligarchy, or an oligarchy might turn into a democracy. Such a change is comprehensive,
impacting the entire state structure.
2. Partial Revolution (Change of Rulers): In this type of revolution, the system of government
remains intact, but those in power are replaced. This might involve ousting a particular ruler or
set of rulers without altering the form of government itself. A common example is when a ruler
is deposed, but the monarchy as an institution remains.
Type of Revolution Description Example
Complete
Entire system of government changes Oligarchy shifts to democracy
Revolution
Ruling individuals are replaced, system Removal of a tyrant but continuation of
Partial Revolution
remains the same monarchy

7
Conditions That Make a State Vulnerable to Revolution
Aristotle explored several conditions that make a state more susceptible to revolution. He believed that
a well-organized state could reduce the likelihood of unrest if it maintained fairness, balanced power,
and economic stability. However, specific conditions could lead a state down the path of instability:
1. Extreme Wealth Disparity: When wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few, it leads to
resentment among the lower classes. Such economic inequality fuels discontent, making it easy
for agitators to mobilize people against the ruling elite.
2. Class Conflicts: Social tensions between different classes—whether wealthy and poor,
aristocrats and commoners, or landowners and peasants—are often the basis for revolution.
Aristotle believed that society was most stable when the middle class was substantial, as it
served as a buffer between the extremes.
3. Weak or Unjust Leadership: Aristotle stressed that rulers must act justly and avoid arrogance.
When leaders act in self-interest or become detached from the needs of the people, they foster
hostility and rebellion. He saw tyrannical leadership as especially destabilizing because it stifles
freedom, which people deeply value.
Condition for Vulnerability Description Example
Economic inequalities causing Wealthy few controlling resources in an
Extreme Wealth Disparity
resentment oligarchy
Class Conflicts Tensions between social classes Conflict between nobility and commoners
Weak or Unjust Leadership Self-interested rulers create discontent Tyrannical rule in autocratic states

Remedies to Prevent Revolution

To prevent revolution, Aristotle suggested several remedies aimed at fostering social harmony, fairness,
and balanced power distribution. His proposed solutions involve not only addressing grievances but also
creating a stable political environment.
1. Promote a Strong Middle Class: Aristotle saw the middle class as a stabilizing force. A large and
economically secure middle class prevents polarization between the wealthy and the poor. The
middle class, being neither extremely rich nor poor, has interests aligned with both stability and
fairness, making them resistant to extremes.
2. Encourage the Rule of Law: Aristotle emphasized that laws should govern society rather than
individuals. Laws represent reason and justice, ensuring that no one is above the rules and that
citizens are treated fairly. A fair legal system reduces grievances and discourages revolts.
3. Limit Inequality: Aristotle recommended that rulers avoid extreme economic inequality by
implementing policies that promote fair wealth distribution. By doing so, they can reduce the
chances of resentment among the lower classes. Policies that encourage economic opportunity
for all citizens, especially for the middle and lower classes, create a more balanced and stable
society.
4. Ensure Virtuous Leadership: Aristotle argued that leaders should act with justice and avoid
arrogance. Leaders who focus on the common good, who respect citizens’ rights, and who avoid
oppressive practices can foster loyalty among the people and prevent resentment. Virtuous
leadership, in Aristotle’s view, promotes respect and discourages revolution.
Preventive Measure Description Purpose
Encourage economic security for middle-income
Strong Middle Class Reduces class conflicts and polarization
citizens
Rule of Law Govern by laws, not individuals Ensures fairness and reduces grievances
Limit Inequality Implement fair wealth distribution policies Reduces resentment among lower

8
Preventive Measure Description Purpose
classes
Virtuous Leadership Leaders act with justice and humility Prevents tyranny, fosters loyalty

Examples of Aristotle’s Theory of Revolution in Practice

Aristotle’s insights on the causes and prevention of revolution are timeless and can be observed in
various historical contexts.
 French Revolution (1789): This revolution stemmed from extreme inequality, class conflict, and
a detached monarchy. The concentration of wealth and privilege among the aristocracy led to
deep resentment among the middle and lower classes, who suffered under high taxes and lack
of representation. The French Revolution exemplifies a “complete revolution,” where the
existing monarchy was entirely overthrown and replaced by a republic.
 Spartan Reforms: In Sparta, early leaders implemented policies to limit wealth disparity, such as
equal land distribution among Spartan citizens. This helped to reduce economic tensions and
promoted social stability. These policies created a strong, unified middle class of Spartan
warriors, which minimized the risk of internal rebellion and sustained Sparta’s stability for
centuries.
 Modern Example – Income Inequality and Unrest: In the 21st century, many countries face
challenges related to wealth inequality. Economic disparity often leads to social movements and
political unrest, such as the Occupy Wall Street movement in the U.S. or the Yellow Vests
movement in France. These movements reflect Aristotle’s observations on how economic
inequality can lead to grievances and social discord, especially when citizens feel marginalized.

Aristotle’s Theory of Revolution remains influential, offering insights into the dynamics of political
change and the conditions that foster or prevent revolutions. By identifying the causes of revolution—
such as inequality, grievances, and ambition for power—Aristotle provided a framework for
understanding the instability that can arise in any society. His emphasis on remedies, like a strong
middle class, the rule of law, and virtuous leadership, highlights his belief in the power of balanced, just
governance to promote stability.

THEORY OF SLAVERY
Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery is one of the more controversial aspects of his philosophy, deeply rooted in
the context of ancient Greek society, where slavery was a common institution. In his work Politics,
Aristotle presents an argument for what he calls "natural slavery," suggesting that some individuals are
naturally suited to be slaves and others to be masters. This theory reflects both Aristotle’s observations
of his time and his broader philosophy on the nature and purpose of human beings. However, his
perspective on slavery has been widely criticized and debated, as it challenges modern values of equality
and human rights.

9
Aristotle’s Concept of “Natural Slavery”
Aristotle’s theory of slavery is based on the idea of "natural slavery," meaning that some individuals are
inherently suited to a life of servitude, while others are naturally inclined to rule. According to Aristotle,
nature has created a hierarchy among human beings, and he argues that this hierarchy can be observed
through differences in rationality, virtue, and capability. He claims that those who lack the capacity for
rational thought and self-governance are "natural slaves," who benefit from being ruled by those with
stronger intellectual and moral qualities.
 Natural Slaves: According to Aristotle, natural slaves are people who, by nature, lack the ability
to think critically or make decisions for themselves. He argues that they benefit from a life under
the direction of a master, who can guide them towards fulfilling tasks they would not manage
on their own.
 Natural Masters: Aristotle believes that natural masters are those who possess reason, virtue,
and the ability to lead others. These individuals, in his view, are suited to govern both
themselves and others, and they fulfill their purpose by directing those less capable.

Role Characteristics According to Aristotle Example (from Aristotle’s perspective)

Lacks rational capacity, requires A laborer with limited education, as viewed in
Natural Slave
direction ancient times
Natural Possesses reason, virtue, and leadership
Greek citizen capable of self-governance
Master ability

Justification of Slavery as Beneficial for Both Slave and Master

One of Aristotle’s main justifications for slavery is his belief that it benefits both the slave and the
master. He argued that natural slaves are better off under the control of masters who can provide
guidance, protection, and structure. By fulfilling their assigned roles, slaves contribute to the economy
and allow the master to focus on higher pursuits, such as philosophy and governance. Aristotle believed
that in this arrangement, slaves achieve their purpose by working under those who can direct their
actions towards productive outcomes.
For Aristotle, this dynamic serves the greater good of the household and, by extension, the state. The
household, or oikos, was the smallest unit of the state and depended on the slave-master relationship to
function effectively. Slaves provided labor that supported the household’s economic needs, enabling the
master to contribute to civic life and intellectual pursuits.
 Example: In an ancient Greek household, a natural slave might be someone who performs
agricultural labor or domestic work, supporting the economic needs of the household. The
master, who is viewed as naturally suited for leadership, would then be free to engage in state
governance or philosophy.

Role in
Function Benefit to Household
Household
Performs essential labor (agriculture, domestic Supports economic needs of
Slave
work) household
Oversees, participates in civic life, engages in Guides household and contributes
Master
intellectual pursuits to state

Differences between Natural and Legal Slavery

Aristotle distinguishes between "natural slavery" and "legal slavery." He sees natural slavery as an
organic and justifiable institution, where certain people are slaves by virtue of their nature. However, he
criticizes legal slavery, which was often the result of war and conquest, as sometimes unjust. In

10
Aristotle’s view, not all people captured in war are naturally suited to slavery; rather, some are capable
of rational thought and should not be enslaved merely because of misfortune.
 Natural Slavery: Aristotle justifies this as an inherent social structure, where some people are
better suited to follow rather than lead.
 Legal Slavery: This type of slavery results from human law, particularly as a consequence of
warfare. Aristotle questions the fairness of enslaving people simply due to military defeat, as he
believed that these individuals may not naturally be suited for slavery.

Criticism and Limitations of Aristotle’s Theory

While Aristotle’s theory of slavery attempts to justify an existing social structure, it has several
limitations and has been widely criticized for its ethical implications. Modern interpretations challenge
the assumptions that underlie his argument, particularly the idea that some people are “naturally”
suited for servitude.
1. Ethical Critique: Aristotle’s justification of slavery conflicts with modern views on human rights
and equality. Today, we believe that all individuals have intrinsic worth and deserve the same
freedoms, regardless of intellectual or social differences.
2. Lack of Empirical Evidence: Aristotle’s categorization of individuals as natural slaves or masters
lacks empirical support. Intelligence, virtue, and rational capacity are qualities that can vary
within any group and are not predetermined by birth.
3. Societal Inequality: Aristotle’s theory reinforces social inequality by justifying an existing power
structure where one group has absolute authority over another. This can perpetuate oppression
and limit the potential of individuals who are unfairly categorized.

Criticism Explanation
Ethical Critique Modern values reject inherent superiority/inferiority
Lack of Empirical Support No scientific basis for categorizing “natural slaves”
Reinforces Inequality Justifies a rigid social hierarchy, limiting individual potential

Examples of Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery Applied in Ancient Greece

1. Athenian Household Slavery: In Athens, it was common for households to have slaves
performing domestic tasks and agricultural work. Aristotle would argue that these slaves, lacking
the “rational” qualities of their masters, fulfilled their natural role by supporting the family’s
economic and practical needs.
2. State-Owned Slaves in Sparta: Unlike Athens, where slavery was more domesticated, Sparta
had a unique form of state-owned slavery called helotry. Helots were often conquered people
who served Spartan citizens by working the land. Though not exactly fitting Aristotle’s theory of
natural slavery, the Spartan system shows the pervasive role of forced labor in ancient Greece.

Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery reflects the cultural norms of ancient Greece, where slavery was a common
and accepted institution. He attempted to provide a rational explanation for slavery, arguing that some
people are “naturally” suited to servitude. However, his ideas are deeply flawed by modern standards,
as they contradict the ideals of equality and freedom. Aristotle’s distinction between natural and legal
slavery, as well as his belief in a hierarchy of roles, reveals a complex view of social order that, while
influential, has been heavily criticized and largely rejected in contemporary philosophy.
His theory ultimately serves as a reminder of how philosophical perspectives can be shaped by their
historical context and illustrates the ongoing evolution of human values concerning freedom and justice.

11
ARISTOTLE AS A FIRST POLITICAL THINKER
Aristotle is often hailed as the first true political thinker in Western philosophy, earning this title due to
his systematic exploration of politics as a field distinct from ethics, economics, and other domains of
human life. While his teacher Plato also explored political ideas, Aristotle's approach to politics was
revolutionary in its depth, realism, and practicality. Through his comprehensive analysis of the state,
citizenship, government forms, justice, and the role of law, Aristotle laid the foundational principles of
political science, establishing him as the "father of political philosophy."

Aristotle’s Approach to Politics: A Practical Science

Aristotle saw politics as a practical science aimed at achieving the “good life” for individuals within
society. Unlike speculative sciences, such as metaphysics, which seek knowledge for its own sake,
practical sciences, according to Aristotle, are concerned with actions and decisions that affect everyday
life. For Aristotle, the purpose of political philosophy is not merely to understand the nature of the state

12
but to improve it for the benefit of its citizens. His approach makes him the first political thinker to treat
politics as a pragmatic tool to address the needs of a community.
 Example: In his work Politics, Aristotle argues that the state exists “for the sake of the good life”
and that political structures should facilitate citizens' ability to lead morally fulfilling lives. His
focus on practical concerns, like justice, governance, and citizen participation, highlights his
belief that political theory should be applied to improve society.

Area of Inquiry Aristotle's Approach Example from Politics

Aimed at achieving the good life and Analysis of state functions for citizen
Purpose of Politics
practical outcomes wellbeing
Political Theory Examining different government forms
Pragmatic and meant to improve society
Application for stability

Distinction between Politics and Ethics

Aristotle was the first philosopher to explicitly separate politics from ethics, arguing that while both aim
at the good life, they address it from different perspectives. Ethics focuses on individual virtue and moral
character, whereas politics is concerned with the collective good of the community. Aristotle saw
politics as the means through which ethical principles could be applied at the societal level, thus creating
a just and stable state. By distinguishing these domains, he recognized that personal morality and civic
responsibility are interconnected but not identical.
In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle explores the nature of virtue, focusing on how individuals can
cultivate personal moral character. However, in Politics, he shifts his focus to how the state can create
an environment conducive to virtue. By treating politics as a field with its own distinct concerns and
methodologies, Aristotle established the groundwork for political science as a discipline separate from
personal morality.

Domain Focus Aristotle's Distinction

Ethics Individual virtue and personal moral character Guides how individuals should live
Politics The collective good and governance Structures society to promote ethical lives

Classification of Government Forms

One of Aristotle's most groundbreaking contributions to political thought is his systematic classification
of government types, which he evaluates based on whether they serve the common good or merely the
interests of the rulers. He classifies governments into three ideal forms—monarchy, aristocracy, and
polity—and their corresponding corrupt forms—tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Aristotle’s
classification is based on two criteria: the number of rulers (one, few, or many) and whether rulers
govern for the common good or their own benefit.
By creating this classification, Aristotle set a precedent for evaluating political systems based on moral
and practical considerations, rather than simply accepting them as they are.

Form of Government Ideal Type Corrupt Type Primary Goal

Rule by One Monarchy Tyranny Common good vs. personal gain
Rule by Few Aristocracy Oligarchy Virtuous governance vs. elite interests
Rule by Many Polity Democracy Balanced governance vs. majority interests

Role of the Middle Class in Political Stability

13
Aristotle’s analysis of the middle class as a stabilizing force in society was innovative and underscored
his realistic approach to politics. Unlike Plato, who envisioned an ideal society led by philosopher-kings,
Aristotle believed that political stability was best achieved when power was shared among citizens with
moderate means, who would act as a balancing force between the rich and the poor. He argued that a
strong middle class reduces social tensions and promotes a stable polity, as they are less likely to be
driven by the excesses of wealth or the desperation of poverty.
This emphasis on the middle class reflects Aristotle's practical insights into the causes of social conflict
and the conditions needed for a balanced and just society. His views on the middle class are echoed in
modern democratic systems, where a large, economically secure middle class is seen as vital to political
stability and cohesion.

The Role of Law and Justice in Politics

For Aristotle, law and justice are the foundation of any stable political system. He argued that a just
state is governed by laws that reflect rational principles, rather than the arbitrary rule of individuals.
Aristotle believed that laws should guide citizens to act virtuously, thus supporting the common good.
Justice, in his view, is twofold: distributive justice (fair distribution of wealth and honors based on merit)
and corrective justice (fair treatment in transactions and punishment for wrongdoing).
Aristotle’s emphasis on the rule of law is an important shift from previous philosophical ideas. By
advocating for a legal framework that promotes justice, he laid the groundwork for the idea that laws,
rather than rulers, should govern societies. This perspective remains influential in modern political
thought, where the rule of law is seen as essential to democracy and fair governance.

Politics as a Partnership and the Concept of Citizenship

Aristotle introduced the idea of politics as a form of partnership, in which citizens work together toward
the common good. In his view, the state is a community that exists for the sake of living well, and
citizenship entails active participation in this partnership. Aristotle defined citizens not by residency but
by their role in governance, arguing that only those who actively participate in political life should be
considered citizens. This concept of citizenship implies both rights and responsibilities, as citizens
contribute to the state’s decision-making and uphold its values.
Aristotle’s view on citizenship contrasts sharply with modern notions of automatic citizenship by birth.
By emphasizing civic engagement as a criterion for citizenship, he highlighted the idea that political
participation is essential for a healthy state. His thoughts on citizenship laid the foundation for later
democratic principles, where active participation in governance is valued.

Legacy of Aristotle as the First Political Thinker

Aristotle’s contributions to political philosophy established many concepts still central to political
science today. His classifications of government, focus on the middle class, views on citizenship, and
emphasis on the rule of law shaped how politics was studied and discussed for centuries. Unlike his
predecessors, Aristotle’s political theory was grounded in the reality of human society, analyzing political
institutions in terms of their functions and effectiveness rather than their ideals alone.
Aristotle's influence is profound in fields such as political theory, law, and governance, where his ideas
on balance, justice, and pragmatic governance continue to be studied and applied. His practical
approach, separating politics from philosophy while grounding it in ethics, established Aristotle as the
first real political scientist in Western thought, whose theories form the bedrock of political inquiry.

Aristotle’s Contributions Impact on Political Thought

Classification of Government Forms Basis for understanding different political systems
Emphasis on Middle Class Recognized importance of social balance

14
 Aristotle’s Contributions Impact on Political Thought
Role of Law and Justice Foundation for rule of law in governance
Active Citizenship and Participation Emphasized civic duty and political engagement

In conclusion, Aristotle is considered the first political thinker because he treated politics as a distinct,
systematic field grounded in reality. By focusing on practical outcomes, justice, and stability, he
developed a framework that examines politics as a science aimed at the betterment of society, leaving
an indelible mark on political philosophy that resonates to this day.

15