Influence of Different Hormones and Potting Media On Growth and Quality of Chitrak (Plumbago Zeylanica L.)
Influence of Different Hormones and Potting Media On Growth and Quality of Chitrak (Plumbago Zeylanica L.)
To know the growth pattern and also Total Phenolic Content 1. To study the effect of hormone concentrations on the
in Chitrak under the South Gujarat conditions, as phenols are growth of Plumbago zeylanica L.
one of the best source as Antioxidants, the present experiment 2. To find out the effect of various potting media on the
was designed with below mentioned objectives: growth and quality of Plumbago zeylanica L.
Fig 1: Clinically proven Major and Minor pharmacological properties (Khare, 2007 and 2004) [16, 17]
Materials and Methods [Factor 1/level 1], where H1 is control, H2- IBA @ 500 ppm,
The present investigation entitled “Influence of Different H3- IBA @ 1000 ppm and H4- IBA @1500 ppm. In nursery
Hormones and Potting Media on Growth and Quality of condition 600 black polythene bags having size 6 × 8 inches
Chitrak [Plumbago zeylanica L.] was carried out at Model (Mass capacity: 2.0 kg approx.) was used to fill the 5 types of
Nursery of Medicinal & Aromatic Plants, ASPEE College of potting mixtures. As a part of CRD with Factorial Concept,
Horticulture and Forestry, NAU, Navsari (AES III-Heavy various potting media were used viz. M1- Black Soil
Rainfall Zone) during the month of November, 2021 to (Control), M2- Red Soil, M3- Black Soil + FYM (2:1), M4-
March, 2022. Red Soil + FYM (2:1) and M5- Black Soil + Sand + FYM
The average rainfall received during the study period was (2:1:1) respectively. (Factor 2/ Level 2)
14.87 mm. The average relative humidity during the study For recording observations regarding the growth and quality,
period was 87% and 53% in morning and evening hours. The five plants were randomly selected and tagged in each
average maximum and minimum temperature during the replication. Whereas, for phenol extraction 20 plants were
study period was 32.51 °C and 18.95 °C respectively. randomly selected. Plant height was recorded from the five
Equal sized 3 nodes stem cutting (approximate length of 10- randomly selected plants in each replication with the help of
12 cm) were treated with various concentrations of rooting scale from the base to the tip of plant expressed in centimeters
hormone (IBA @ 500, 1000 and 1500 ppm) respectively. as mean plant height at regular intervals of 30, 60, 90 DAP
~ 2390 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal https://www.thepharmajournal.com
and at harvest. Number of leaves per plant and Number of number of leaves (3.74, 6.37, 7.85 and 6.87), maximum
branching were counted from the five randomly selected number of branches (1.44, 1.71, 1.78 and 2.02), maximum
plants in each replication and expressed as mean number of stem diameter (5.46 mm, 5.60 mm, 5.76 mm and 5.97 mm)
leaves and branches per plant at regular intervals of 30, 60, 90 was recorded respectively at 30, 60, 90 DAP and at harvest in
DAP and at harvest. Stem diameter per plant was measured treatment (H1). The maximum root fresh and root dry biomass
with help of Digital Vernier Caliper at the collar region of were (0.88 g and 0.53 g), shoot fresh and shoot dry biomass
plant expressed in millimeter (mm)as mean stem diameter per were (3.15 g and 1.24 g), total fresh and total dry biomass
plant at regular intervals of 30, 60, 90 days after planting and were (3.28 g and 1.24), root length (18.34 cm) and (7.20 mm)
at harvest. The total biomass per plant was worked out by root collar diameter at harvest in control, i.e., treatment (H1).
adding the mean fresh leaf per plant, mean fresh stem yield Amongst the different potting media used, the maximum plant
per plant and mean fresh root yield per plant expressed in height (14.66 cm, 14.99 cm, 15.20 cm and 15.44 cm), number
grams. The root and shoot biomass per plant was measured by of leaves (3.89, 6.27, 9.47 and 7.60), number of branches
weighing fresh and dry in grams. Length of main root was (1.49, 1.79, 1.82, 2.19), stem diameter (5.62 mm, 5.75 mm,
measured in centimeters with the help of scale at harvest. 6.00 mm and 6.27 mm) were recorded at 30, 60, 90 DAP and
Root collar diameter of cuttings measured at collar region (or at harvest, respectively and root length (19.27 cm), root collar
base, just above the soil) using digital caliper and it was diameter (7.88 mm), root fresh and dry biomass, (1.22 g and
expressed in millimeter (mm) at monthly intervals after 0.67 g), shoot fresh and dry biomass, (3.15 g and 1.28 g) and
sowing. i.e., 30, 60, 90, and at harvest. total fresh and dry biomass, (3.45 g and 1.55 g) in treatment
Five composite samples were drawn from the soil to record (M3) i.e., Black soil + FYM (2:1).
the textural and chemical characters of soil using standard Whereas, maximum TPC recorded was 36.15 (mg GAE /g
procedures before the start of experiment. Soil was dry weight basis) at harvest in treatment (H4) i.e., @ IBA
thoroughly mixed together, thus a composite representative 1500 ppm and the recorded maximum root TPC 36.72 (mg
sample was taken for chemical analysis using standard GAE /g dry weight basis) was recorded at harvest in treatment
procedures to evaluate the fertility status of the soil at the end (M5) i.e., Black soil + Sand + FYM (2:1:1).
of experiment. The results obtained during research/experiment with respect
TPC was estimated by Folin-ciocalteau method with to growth and quality after application of hormones as well as
modifications as and when require. Agarval and Paridhavi, different potting media are also supported by findings of other
(2008) [1], Daniel, (1992) [6], Raman, (2006) [21], Sadasivam workers like Dhar (1999) [8], Deshpandey (2005) [5],
and Manickam, (2008) [22]. Kalaiarasan and john (2011) [15], Walia et al. (2012) [24], Goel
and Duhan (2014) [10], Chavda et al. (2015) [4], Ganvit (2016)
[9]
Results and Discussion , Malek (2017) [19], Pooja et al. (2017) [20] and Architha
An appraisal of data indicated that maximum plant height (2020) [2] respectively.
(14.06 cm, 14.31 cm, 14.52 cm and 14.74 cm), maximum
A B
~ 2391 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal https://www.thepharmajournal.com
C D
E F
G H
~ 2392 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal https://www.thepharmajournal.com
I J
K L
Fig: 2 Influence of different hormones and potting media on plant height (A-B), No. of Leaves (C-D), stem diameter (E-F), root length (G), root
collar diameter (H), root dry biomass (I), shoot dry biomass (J), total dry biomass (K) and TPC (L).
Table 3: Influence of different hormones and potting media on biomass, root length, root collar diameter and total phenolic content (TPC) in
Chitrak [Plumbago zeylanica L.]
Treatment Shoot dry biomass Root dry biomass Total dry biomass Root length Root collar diameter TPC
Growth Hormone – Factor 1
H1 1.24 0.53 1.24 18.34 7.20 35.93
H2 0.93 0.37 1.19 17.13 7.18 35.53
H3 0.90 0.35 1.17 16.41 6.83 35.20
H4 0.86 0.21 1.14 14.15 6.34 36.15
SE(m) 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.44 0.18 0.06
CD at 5% 0.08 0.04 1.26 0.51 0.18
Potting Media – Factor 2
M1 1.18 0.41 1.37 18.78 7.02 35.09
M2 0.64 0.20 0.76 13.14 6.07 35.32
M3 1.28 0.67 1.55 19.27 7.88 35.99
M4 0.82 0.24 0.97 15.35 6.49 35.39
M5 0.99 0.31 1.27 16.00 6.98 36.72
SE(m) 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.49 0.20 0.07
CD at 5% 0.08 0.04 0.15 1.41 0.57 0.21
CV % 10.42 13.61 15.78 10.32 10.06 0.70
~ 2393 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal https://www.thepharmajournal.com