National IPC Reference Manual Guidline Volume 1
National IPC Reference Manual Guidline Volume 1
FOREWORD
The Government of Ethiopia is committed to improving the quality of healthcare for its citizens.
Among the many initiatives underway, the protection of patients and healthcare workers from
infection and the reduction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at healthcare facilities have been given
particular attention by the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). Infection prevention and control
(IPC) is a critical component of quality health services. The FMOH is scaling up its health facility-
related IPC activities and will use all opportunities to strengthen ongoing IPC activities. As in many
of its programs, the FMOH’s IPC endeavors are guided by current scientific evidence to establish
optimal IPC practices and processes at healthcare facilities. Global estimates on healthcare-acquired
infections show that hundreds of millions of patients are affected every year worldwide, with the
burden of disease especially high in low- and middle-income countries.
Healthcare-associated infection causes a real threat to healthcare providers and communities at large
and, at times, brings additional costs to patients, in particular, and to the healthcare system, in general.
Because of inadequate IPC practices, healthcare providers and patients are at increased risk of
acquiring serious infections, such as HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), Ebola,
and other emerging and reemerging bacterial or viral infections, including AMR and multidrug-
resistant tuberculosis. Fortunately, most healthcare-associated infections at healthcare facilities can
be prevented with the use of readily available, relatively inexpensive, and simple strategies.
In Ethiopia, where many healthcare settings are resource constrained, the control of the risk of
acquiring healthcare-associated infection is very challenging. For the control measures or practices
to be effective, material resources, human resources, training, policy, guidelines, and IPC programs
are essential. IPC in healthcare settings is a broad, cross-cutting component of healthcare, which
involves every aspect of patient care, food hygiene, housekeeping, laundry service, and waste
management, among other components.
The FMOH has been implementing and revising sets of IPC guidelines to improve IPC practices in
healthcare facilities over several years. This IPC reference manual is primarily intended for use by
healthcare providers and health service managers. It will help users by providing clear guidanceon
the provision of standard IPC practices at their respective facilities. The material was developed by
incorporating Ethiopian experiences, international best practices, and standardized
recommendations. It is composed of innovative and evidence-based methods used widely all over
the world to reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections and the associated healthcare
costs. It is also expected that health bureaus, program managers, other stakeholders, and interest
groups will benefit from consulting this reference manual. I wish to extend my heartfelt gratitude to
all individuals and institutions that have contributed to the completion of this revised reference
manual.
Lia Tadesse,M.D,MHA
Minister, Ministry of Health
Foreword 2
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
FOREWORD
Infection prevention and control (IPC) refers to measures aimed at preventing and controlling
infections and transmission of infections in healthcare settings and the community. IPC is crucial in
all healthcare facilities and is critical for a well-functioning healthcare system. Ensuring compliance
with IPC practices depends on understanding the extent of the implementation of policies and
guidelines. Many hospitals are inadequately staffed with healthcare workers with IPC expertise, and
there is acute awareness of the need to address this problem. Implementation of IPC guidelines is
essential in all healthcare facilities for the wellbeing and safety of patients, staff, and visitors.
IPC programmes have been demonstrated to be clinically and financially beneficial, resulting in
significant cost savings from fewer Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), shorter hospital stays,
lower levels of antibiotic resistance, and lower costs of treating infections. These infections may
already present at the time of admission or they may develop over time (nosocomial infections) in
healthcare facilities.
The Infection Prevention and Control Policy, Strategy and Strategy Roadmap, and Monitoring and
Evaluation Plan were created by the Ministry of Health and are currently being implemented
throughout all the health care systems. Additionally, the updated guide manual will benefit users by
offering clear instructions on how to implement conventional IPC practices at their own facilities.
The Ministry of Health's updated reference manual on infection prevention and control (IPC)
addresses growing concerns about ineffective IPC procedures in healthcare facilities nationwide as
well as the need for ongoing readiness and response in the wake of the emergence of emerging and
re-emerging infections like the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. The road map for putting sustainable
IPC measures into practice is provided in this document.
In order to implement the policy and guidelines, it is essential to establish a strategy work plan that
will act as a road map for all stakeholders (the Ministry, development and implementing partners).
This will make it easier to guarantee that we complete IPC and related tasks on schedule and in line
with scope. I want to thank the National IPC TWG for their dedication in writing and reviewing this
material.
The reference guide was created by taking into account Ethiopian experiences, global best practices,
and predetermined suggestions. It is made up of cutting-edge, empirically supported techniques that
are extensively employed around the globe to lower the prevalence of healthcare-associated
infections and the corresponding healthcare costs. It is anticipated that this reference guide will be
useful to health bureaus, programme managers, other stakeholders, and interest groups.
Finally, I want to express my sincere gratitude to all the people and organizations who helped produce
and update this reference manual.
Table of Contents 3
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The National Infection Prevention and Control reference manual for Health Care Settings has been updated
through the contributions of many individuals and institutions that are committed to improve the infection
prevention and control practice in health care settings.
FMOH would like to especially thank Jhpiego’s headquarters and country office. This revised manual is
adapted from Jhpiego’s Infection Prevention and Control: Reference Manual for Health Care Facilities with
Limited Resources. MOH would also like to acknowledge the Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical
Services (MTaPS) program, funded by the US Agency for International Development, for providing financial
and technical support for revising this document.
MOH would like to thank the National Technical Working Group on Infection Prevention and Control, for
their expertise and time to review this national reference manual and everyone who contributed by reviewing
and provide technical inputs in the development of the guideline.
Table of Contents 4
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... 2
Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................... 3
List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ 9
Rationale for the Manual............................................................................................................... 11
Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 12
Chapter 1: Introduction to Infection Prevention and Control ....................................................... 25
Chapter 2: Basic Microbiology for IPC ........................................................................................ 37
Chapter 3: Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions........................................................... 55
Chapter 4: Hand Hygiene.............................................................................................................. 65
Chapter 5: Personal Protective Equipment ................................................................................... 86
Chapter 6: Sharps and Injection Safety ....................................................................................... 117
Chapter 7: Decontamination and Reprocessing of Medical Devices (Instrument Processing) .. 140
Chapter 8: Processing Reusable Textiles and Laundry Services ................................................ 189
Chapter 9: Environmental Cleaning in Healthcare Setting ......................................................... 201
Chapter 10: Healthcare Waste Management ............................................................................... 213
Chapter 11: Food and Water Safety ............................................................................................ 239
Chapter 12: Facility Design and Patient Flow ............................................................................ 250
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare
Settings ........................................................................................................................................ 262
Chapter 14: Client Education on Infection Prevention and Control ........................................... 290
APPENDICES
Appendicies for Chapter 4
Appendix 4A. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form: World Health Organization ............. 300
Appendix 4B. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form Modified for Room Entry and Exit .. 303
Appendix 4C. Implementation of a Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy ............ 305
Appendicies for Chapter 13
Appendix 13A. Initial Management of a Person Reporting Exposure to Potentially
Infectious Body Fluids ................................................................................................................ 309
Appendix 13B. Summary of Steps in Clinical Management of HIV Post- Exposure
Prophylaxis ................................................................................................................................. 310
Appendix 13C. Facilitating Informed Patient Decision Making For HIV Post- Exposure
Table of Contents 5
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 The infection chain ...................................................................................................... 28
Figure 1.2.Transmissions of HBV and HIV from patients to HCWs ........................................... 30
Figure 1.3. Breaking the chain of infection .................................................................................. 32
Figure 2.1. Structure of a bacterial cell ......................................................................................... 39
Figure 2.2. Colony morphology of bacteria .................................................................................. 40
Figure 2.3. Shapes and groupings of bacteria ............................................................................... 40
Figure 2.4. Bacterial classification by staining properties ............................................................ 41
Figure 2.5. Transmission electron micrograph of EVD ................................................................ 43
Figure 2.6. Candida albicans ......................................................................................................... 44
Figure 2.7. Plasmodium falciparum, malaria parasite .................................................................. 45
Figure 4.1. The steps for routine handwashing (How to properly wash your hands) ................... 68
Figure 4.2. WHO recommendation on how to perform hand hygiene with ABHR ..................... 71
Figure 4.3. Five steps of the hand hygiene improvement strategy ............................................... 79
Figure 5.1 Surgical head coverings ............................................................................................... 89
Figure 5.2. Different types of eye protection equipment .............................................................. 91
Figure 5.3. Putting on eye protection ............................................................................................ 91
Figure 5.4. Taking off eye protection ........................................................................................... 92
Figure 5.5. Types of masks ........................................................................................................... 93
Figure 5.6. Coverall suit................................................................................................................ 95
Figure 5.7. A and B. Putting on and removing an isolation gown ................................................ 96
Figure 5.8. The glove pyramid .................................................................................................... 100
Table of Contents 6
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Figure 5.9. How to don and remove examination gloves ........................................................... 103
Figure 5.10. How to wear (don) sterile gloves ............................................................................ 104
Figure 5.11. How to remove (doff) sterile gloves ....................................................................... 105
Figure 5.12. Cutting the four fingers off a glove ........................................................................ 107
Figure 6.1. Unsafe injection practices and disease transmission ................................................ 120
Figure 6.2. One-handed recap method ........................................................................................ 125
Figure 6.3. ONE and ONLY Campaign ...................................................................................... 128
Figure 6.4. Breaking open an ampoule ....................................................................................... 132
Figure 6.5. Withdrawing medication using an auto-disable syringe .......................................... 133
Figure 6.6. Standard safety box .................................................................................................. 134
Figure 7.1. Workflow for instrument processing and other medical devices ............................. 142
Figure 7.2. Typical wrapping techniques .................................................................................... 158
Figure 7.3. Steamer used for HLD .............................................................................................. 162
Figure 7.4. Simplified diagram of a gravity displacement steam sterilizer ................................ 168
Figure 7.5. Loading the steam sterilizer...................................................................................... 173
Figure 7.6. Non-electric gravity displacement steam sterilizer .................................................. 176
Figure 9.1: Frequently touched surfaces at health facilities (Examination room) ...................... 206
Figure 10.1. Hazardous waste symbols for healthcare facilities ................................................. 221
Figure 10.2. Practical classification of hospital wastes and methods of disposal ....................... 226
Figure 10.3. Diagram of an autoclave ......................................................................................... 228
Figure 10.4. Standard components of a small-scale incinerator ................................................. 230
Figure 10.5. Plan for a small burial pit ....................................................................................... 232
Figure 10.6. Placenta pit plan ..................................................................................................... 234
Figure 12.1. a and b: Floor plans for instrument cleaning, high-level disinfecting, and
sterilizing areas in a clinic and larger facility ............................................................................. 252
Figure 12.2. Floor plan for a CSSD in a hospital........................................................................ 258
List of Tables
Table 1.1. WHO core components of IPC .................................................................................... 26
Table 2.1. Basic features of microorganisms and the implications for healthcare ....................... 37
Table 2.2. Microorganisms that cause the four HAIs of global public health interest ................. 49
Table 2.3. Background of the common organisms that cause infection of body systems ............ 51
Table 3.1. Empiric use of transmission-based precautions (based on signs and symptoms)
for isolation of a patient in the hospital ........................................................................................ 63
Table of Contents 7
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Table 4.1. WHO’s five recommended moments for hand hygiene .............................................. 66
Table 4.2. Hand hygiene observation methods ............................................................................. 76
Table 4.3. Advantages and disadvantages of various hand hygiene monitoring approaches ....... 77
Table 4.4. Minimum criteria for implementation ......................................................................... 82
Table 5.1. How PPE blocks the spread of microorganisms .......................................................... 87
Table 5.2. Advantages and disadvantages of different types of non-sterile gloves ...................... 98
Table 6.1. Conditions causing risks to communities, patients/clients, and providers ................. 118
Table 6.2. Proportion of infections and total burden of disease caused by unsafe injections ..... 119
Table 6.3. Right ways to give a safe injection ............................................................................ 122
Table 6.4. Types of injection devices: Advantages and disadvantages ...................................... 127
Table 7.1. Policy for the local decontamination of reusable equipment according to the
Spaulding classification .............................................................................................................. 141
Table 7.2. Effectiveness of methods for processing instruments ................................................ 152
Table 7.3. Liquid chemicals used for sterilization ...................................................................... 180
Table 7.4. Preparing and using chemical disinfectants ............................................................... 185
Table 8.1. Recommended PPE for processing textiles ............................................................... 190
Table 8.2. Guidelines for processing textiles and PPE ............................................................... 199
Table 10.1. Categories of waste generated by healthcare facilities ............................................ 214
Table 10.2. Healthcare waste from different sources in a healthcare facility ............................. 216
Table 10.3. WHO’s recommendations for waste segregation..................................................... 221
Table 10.4. Methods for treating healthcare waste ..................................................................... 224
Table 11.1. National standard for drinking water ....................................................................... 243
Table 11.2. Sample volume and transportation conditions ......................................................... 245
Table 11.3. Sample dechlorination ............................................................................................. 245
Table 11.4. Recommended minimum sample numbers per year for E. coli testing in piped
distribution systems .................................................................................................................... 247
Table 13.1. Occupational health activities for newly employed HCWs ..................................... 265
Table 13.2. Occupational health activities for all HCWs ........................................................... 266
Table 13.3. Facility-wide activities ............................................................................................. 266
Table 13.4. WHO-recommended immunizations for HCWs ...................................................... 267
Table 13.5. Occupational health activities for the management of job-related illnesses and
exposures..................................................................................................................................... 268
Table 13.6. Infectious agents of concern for pregnant HCWs according to the risk of
transmission associated with providing healthcare services and available preventive
measures ...................................................................................................................................... 270
Table of Contents 8
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Table 13.7. Management of occupational exposure to common infections for pregnant staff
members ...................................................................................................................................... 271
Table 13.8. Recommended HIV PEP for percutaneous injuries ................................................. 277
Table 13.9. Recommended HIV PEP for mucous membrane exposures and non-intact skin
exposures..................................................................................................................................... 277
Table 13.10. Considerations of non-occupational PEP according to the type of risk exposure . 278
Table 13.11. Recommended PEP for exposure to HBV ............................................................. 279
Table 13.12. HIV exposure risk and type of exposure................................................................ 281
Table 13.13. Determinants of PEP for occupational exposure to HBV ...................................... 282
Table 14.1 Topics for IPC client education ................................................................................ 296
List of Acronyms 9
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ABHR Alcohol-Based Hand Rub
AFB Acid-Fast Bacilli
AMR Antimicrobial Resistance
AORN Association of periOperative Registered Nurses
APIC Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology
AST Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
3TC Lamivudine
ARV Antiretroviral
AZT Zidovudine
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CJD Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
CMV Cytomegalovirus
CRE Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
CSSD Central Sterile Supply Department
DHHS Department of Health and Human Services
DMPA Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid
EC Exposure Code
EFDA Ethiopian Food and Drug Administration
EFV Efavirenez
EPI Expanded Programme on Immunization
ETO Ethylene Oxide
EVD Ebola Virus Disease
FDA United States Food and Drug Administration
FMOH Federal Ministry of Health
H2O2 Hydrogen Peroxide
HAI Healthcare-Associated/Acquired Infection
HAV Hepatitis A Virus
HBeAg Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen
HBsAg Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
HBIG Hepatitis B immune globulin
HBV Hepatitis B Virus
HCP Healthcare Provider
HCV Hepatitis C Virus
HCW Healthcare Worker
HCWM Healthcare Waste Management
HLD High-Level Disinfection
ICU Intensive Care Unit
IP Infection Prevention
IPC Infection Prevention and Control
List of Acronyms 10
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
List of Acronyms 11
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Significant efforts have been made to update information and practical interventions in IPC areas
of serious concerns. All chapters in this manual have been revised. Additional topics, such as AMR,
prevention of common healthcare-associated/acquired infections (HAIs), IPC in outbreak
management, basic surveillance and biostatistics, basic microbiology, IPC in special settings, and
other issues, have been included. This manual provides practitioners with the most appropriate
recommendations for IPC activities, placing more emphasis on practices and procedures that are
applicable to the country.
The manual is divided in two volumes: Volume I covers general IPC and Volume II addresses
more advanced IPC and special settings. The document serves as a standardized IPC reference
manual for healthcare providers and managers in all government, private, and nongovernmental
healthcare delivery systems. It is also an important resource for health educators, trainers, and
public health and medical officials. It is likewise relevant to preservice education, group-based
training, and on-the-job learning.
The FMOH revitalized the national IPC Advisory Technical Working Group in 2019 under the
Medical Services General Directorate. The Advisory Technical Working Group identified gaps
in the IPC program and practices and took the initiative to review the existing IP- and PS- related
documents to develop this IPC manual.
GLOSSARY
Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) is a fast-acting, antiseptic hand rub that does not require water
to reduce resident flora, kills transient flora on the hands, and has the potential to protect the skin
(depending on the ingredients).
Administrative controls, also known as “work practice controls,” are changes in work
procedures, such as written policies, rules, protocols, supervision, schedules, and training, with the
goal of reducing the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to hazardous situations and
substances (e.g., blood, body fluids, and chemicals).
Airborne transmission is the spread of an infectious agent carried through the air by particles
smaller than five micrometers (µm) in size.
Antibody is a microscopic structure, called an immunoglobulin, produced by the immune system,
which is the system that defends the body from infection. Antibodies can be found in blood and
other body fluids.
Antigens are foreign molecules, such as toxins, viruses, or bacteria that stimulate the body’s
immune system to produce antibodies.
Antimicrobial resistance occurs when microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and
parasites, develop ways to avoid the effects of medications used to treat infections (such as
antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals), and pass these changes on to their offspring, or in some
cases to other bacteria via plasmids. Mechanisms can include the production of substances that
inactivate the drug, an alteration in cell structure that prevents the drug from binding with the cell,
or the ability to pump the drug out of the cell. Resistance develops by changes in existing genes or
by acquisition of new genes (such as from plasmids).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) measures the activity of one or more antimicrobial
agents against a microorganism isolated from a sample to determine potential susceptibility or
resistance to antimicrobials. It helps the prescriber determine which antimicrobial will be most
successful in treating a patient with a specific infection. The type and extent of the AST conducted
depends on the organism isolated, the source of the culture (body site), available antimicrobial
agents, and typical susceptibility patterns.
Antiseptic agents or antimicrobial soap (terms used interchangeably) are chemicals applied to
the skin or other living tissue to inhibit or kill microorganisms (both transient and resident). These
agents, which include alcohol (ethyl or isopropyl), dilute iodine solutions, iodophors,
chlorhexidine, and triclosan, are used to reduce the total bacterial count.
Antiseptic handwashing is washing hands with soap and water or with products containing an
antiseptic agent.
At point of use: equipment, instruments, and supply items are at the place where needed (e.g.,
sharps containers are placed within arm’s reach of where injections are being given).
Glossary 13
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Glossary 14
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Glossary 15
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Glossary 16
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
of equipment that limits exposure to bloodborne pathogens in the workplace, such as sharps
disposal containers, self-sheathing needles (a barrel or cover that automatically slides over the
needle and locks in place once the needle has been removed from the patient), sharps with injury
protection, and needleless systems.
Environmental cleaning in healthcare facilities refers to the general cleaning of surfaces and
equipment to reduce the number of microorganisms present, and providing a clean and pleasant
atmosphere.
Environmental controls are activities of keeping standards specifying procedures to be followed
for the routine care, cleaning, and disinfection of surfaces, beds, bedrails, bedside equipment, and
other frequently touched surfaces.
Exogenous infection is caused by organisms from a source outside the individual’s body.
Exposed person is the person who is potentially at risk of acquiring HIV infection (and or
infection from other pathogens) through exposure to blood or body fluids in his or her occupation
or in another non-occupational situation.
Foodborne or waterborne illness is any disease of an infectious or toxic nature caused by
ingestion of food or water.
Frequently touched surfaces are surfaces in patient care areas in the healthcare facility with
frequent hand contact. These surfaces include door handles, light switches, countertops, bedrails
and ends of beds, patient charts, tap handles, handrails, toilet flushes, rounding and medical
trolleys/carts, buttons on monitors, telephones, and call bells.
General waste does not pose any particular biological, chemical, radioactive, or physical hazard
(e.g., paper boxes, newspapers, magazines, polyethylene bottles, polyester bags, wood, other
papers, metals [e.g., aluminum cans and containers], high-density polyethylene [e.g., milk
containers, saline bottles], glass, and construction/demolition materials).
HAI is an infection that occurs in a patient as a result of care at a healthcare facility and was not
present at the time of arrival at the facility. To be considered an HAI, the infection must begin on
or after the third day of admission to the healthcare facility (the day of admission is Day 1) or on
the day of or the day after discharge from the facility. The term “healthcare associated/acquired
infection” replaces the formerly used “nosocomial” or “hospital” infection because evidence has
shown that these infections can affect patients in any setting where they receive healthcare.
Hand disinfection is a term that WHO does not recommend using because disinfection normally
refers to the decontamination of non-living surfaces and objects.
Hand hygiene is the process of removing soil, debris, and microbes by cleansing the hands using soap
and water, ABHR, antiseptic agents, or antimicrobial soap.
Handwashing is the process of mechanically removing soil, debris, and transient flora from the hands
using soap and clean water.
Glossary 17
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Hazard: Anything (e.g., condition, situation, practice, behavior) that has the potential to cause
harm, including injury, disease, death, environmental, property and equipment damage. A hazard
can be a thing or a situation.
Hazardous waste is waste that can pose a health risk to HCWs, patients, and other people who
are exposed to it. It includes both chemical/radioactive and infectious healthcare waste, for
example, sharps, pathological waste, pharmaceutical waste, and cytotoxic, chemical, and
radioactive waste.
Healthcare worker (HCW), in this manual, is someone who works in a healthcare facility, and
provides healthcare and services to people, either directly or indirectly, such as a clinician, nurse,
midwife, aide, helper, laboratory or x-ray technician, cleaner, or waste handler.
Healthcare textiles are made from woven textile materials, either natural or synthetic fibers, or a
mix of fibers, and material prepared from non-woven fibers. These textiles can be either single-
use or reusable items, and are used to make uniforms, PPE, surgical drapes, bed sheets, and other
items. They are generally referred to as textiles in healthcare facilities.
Healthcare wastewater is any water that has been adversely affected in quality during the
provision of healthcare services. It is mainly liquid waste containing some solids produced by staff
and patients (i.e., human excrement) or during healthcare-related processes, or cooking, cleaning,
and laundering at the healthcare facility. This type of wastewater poses risks similar to those of
domestic wastewater, which is considered infectious. However, healthcare facilities (depending
on the services offered) also generate wastewater that poses a higher risk, containing chemicals,
pharmaceuticals, contagious microorganisms, and radioactive substances.
Healthcare-associated diarrhea is diarrhea that begins on or after the third calendar day of
hospitalization (the day of hospital admission is Day 1).
Healthcare-associated infection is an infection that occurs in a patient as a result of care at a
healthcare facility and that was not present at the time of arrival at the facility. To be considered
an HAI, the infection must begin on or after the third day of admission to the healthcare facility
(the day of admission is Day 1) or on the day of or the day after discharge from the facility. The
term “healthcare-associated infection” replaces the formerly used “nosocomial” or “hospital”
infection because evidence has shown that these infections can affect patients in any setting where
they receive healthcare.
High-level disinfection is a process that kills all microorganisms but not necessarily high numbers
of bacterial spores. HLD is achieved by soaking items in liquid chemicals classified as HLDs or
by boiling or steaming for the appropriate time (20 minutes).
Incineration is one method of waste disposal and involves controlled burning of solid, liquid, or
gaseous combustible wastes that result in inorganic, non-combustible residue.
Infection is an invasion and multiplication of microorganisms in body tissues that may be
clinically apparent or result in local cellular injury due to competitive metabolism, toxins,
intracellular replication, or antigen antibody response.
Glossary 18
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Infection prevention and control refers to scientifically sound practices aimed at preventing
harm caused by infection to patients, health workers, and the community. It is a systematic effort
or process of placing barriers between a susceptible host (a person lacking effective natural or
acquired protection) and infectious agents. IPC is used interchangeably with IP in this manual.
Infectious microorganisms are microorganisms capable of producing disease in the appropriate
hosts. They are also called infectious agents, pathogens, or pathogenic agents interchangeably in
this manual.
Infectious waste is waste that is potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, or pathogenic
organisms, including, but not limited to, laboratory cultures, microbiological stocks, excreta, and
items soiled with blood or body fluids.
Injection safety is a set of techniques used to perform injections in an optimally safe manner for
patients and HCWs during patient care.
Instrument processing areas are places anywhere in the healthcare facility where soiled
instruments, equipment, and other items are cleaned and processed by means of either HLD or
sterilization.
Intermediate-level disinfection is a process that destroys all vegetative bacteria, including
tuberculosis bacilli, all fungi, and most viruses (except some non-lipid viruses) but not bacterial
spores. Intermediate-level disinfection is carried out using chemicals that have been approved as
intermediate-level disinfectants or those that are approved as “tuberculocidal” in the national IPC
guidelines.
Log10 reduction and kill rate is a quantitative (calculable) measurement describing the
percentage of contaminants killed during instrument processing procedures. 1 log10 reduction
means a 90% reduction in microbes on a given surface. For example, if there are 1 million microbes
on a surface, 1 log10 reduction or kill rate will remove 90% of 1 million microbes, 2 log10
reduction or kill rate will remove 99% of microbes, and 5 log10 reduction or kill rate will remove
99.999%. Therefore, a 6 log10 reduction or kill rate will remove 99.9999% of microbes, which
means that only 1 microbe will survive at the end of the procedure that has a kill rate of 6 log10
reductions.
Low-level disinfection is a process that destroys all vegetative bacteria (except tuberculosis
bacilli), lipid viruses, some non-lipid viruses, and some fungi, but not bacterial spores. Low-level
disinfection is carried out using chemicals that have been approved to achieve low-level
disinfection.
Microorganisms are any living organisms, such as bacteria, protozoa, or fungi that cannot be seen
with the naked eye. Microorganisms can only be viewed through a microscope.
Multi-dose vial is a vial of liquid medication intended for parenteral administration (injection or
infusion) that the manufacturer has prepared to contain more than one dose of a medication. Multi-
dose vials are labeled as such by the manufacturer and typically contain an antimicrobial
Glossary 19
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
preservative to help prevent the growth of bacteria. The preservative has no effect on viruses and
does not protect against contamination when HCWs fail to follow safe injection practices.
Municipal waste is general waste that is generated mainly by households, commercial activities,
and street-sweeping. Ideally, it is collected by municipalities (e.g., local villages or cities) but in
some locations this service is not available.
Non-critical items, for the purposes of cleaning and disinfection, are items that come into contact
with intact skin but not with mucous membranes (e.g., blood pressure cuffs, stethoscopes, and
crutches). Most can be cleaned and disinfected at the point of use using a low-level disinfectant.
Nonoccupational exposure is an exposure to HIV and other bloodborne pathogens outside the
work setting. This term predominantly refers to potential exposure through sexual assault. Other
forms of potential non-occupational exposure include those arising from needle-sharing among
injecting drug users, consensual sex, needle sticks in the community, fights or playground
incidents resulting in bleeding by an HIV-infected child, and mass causalities, such as road traffic
accidents, etc.
Normal flora/commensal bacteria are microorganisms (usually bacteria and fungi) that are
naturally present in and on healthy people (e.g., on the skin or in the gut, or reproductive or
respiratory tract).
Occupational exposure is the exposure of an HCW to an infection while providing care and
treatment services to patients in a healthcare facility.
Occupational health activities include all aspects of work-related health and safety activities,
including prevention. The term refers in particular to activities that address infectious hazards at
healthcare facilities.
Occupational health is the discipline that deals with all aspects of work-related health and safety
and has a strong focus on prevention; it is also known as employee health.
Occupational health surveillance is the collection, analysis, and dissemination of data on hazards
that have endangered or may endanger HCWs.
Occupational infection is an infection contracted as a result of an exposure to risk factors arising
from work activity.
Occupational injury or infection is an injury or infection acquired by healthcare staff while
performing their normal duties.
Operating room is an area or space where surgical procedures are performed.
Opportunistic infection is an infection caused by a microorganism that under normal
circumstances does not cause disease but becomes pathogenic when the body’s immune system is
impaired and unable to fight off infection, or antibiotic therapy allows for overgrowth of some
microorganisms (such as yeast in the gastrointestinal and reproductive tracts).
Glossary 20
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Pasteurization is a disinfection process that uses hot water at temperatures of 65–77 °C (149–
170.6 °F) for a contact time of at least 30 minutes to kill or markedly reduce the number of
microorganisms other than bacterial spores.
Patient/client education is defined as a systematized process of transfer of knowledge, skills, and
attitudes that empower the patient, family, caregiver, and community to actively participate in the
promotion and maintenance of a safe healthcare facility environment.
Persistent activity is prolonged or extended protective activity that prevents the growth or survival
of microorganisms after application of an antiseptic; it is also called “residual” activity.
Plasmids are genetic structures in a cell, typically a small, circular DNA strand in the cytoplasm
of a bacterium or protozoan independent of the chromosomes. They are relevant for IPC because
they enable AMR to pass from one genus of bacteria to another.
Point of care is the place where three elements come together: the patient, the HCW, and the care or
treatment involving contact with the patient or the surrounding environment. The concept embraces
the need to perform hand hygiene at recommended moments exactly where care delivery takes place.
This requires that a hand hygiene product (e.g., ABHR) be easily accessible and as close as possible—
within arm’s reach—to where patient care or treatment is provided.
Point of use refers to a place and time where equipment, instruments, and supplies are used on
patients (e.g., the patients’ bedsides, procedure rooms, delivery rooms, operating theaters).
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a type of molecular test in which genetic material
(DNA/RNA) is extracted from the sample and through complex techniques is duplicated or
amplified until there is a large enough amount to test the DNA, RNA, or protein sequences and
identify specific microorganisms.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a preventive medical treatment for which a person may
qualify following potential exposure to a disease-causing pathogen, such as HIV or HBV, to
prevent becoming infected.
PPE items are the protective barriers and respirators used alone or in combination by a HCW to
protect mucous membranes, airways, skin, and clothing from contact with harmful or infectious
agents. PPE may also be used on an infectious patient to prevent the spread of infectious agents
(e.g., surgical mask worn by a patient during transport to control the spread of illness).
Procedure areas are areas where patients are examined and patient care procedures (e.g., pelvic
examinations, wound care management, blood drawing, immunizations, IUD insertions and
removals, and normal childbirth) are performed.
Protective barriers are physical, mechanical, or chemical processes that help prevent the spread
of infectious agents from person to person (patient, healthcare client, or health workers) and/or
equipment, instruments, and environmental surfaces to people.
Residence time is the time that it takes between the entry of a waste substance into a furnace or
incinerator and the exit of exhaust gases or burn-out residue from the furnace or incinerator.
Glossary 21
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Resident flora are microorganisms that live in the deeper layers of the skin and in hair follicles, and
they cannot be completely removed, even by vigorous washing and rinsing with plain soap and clean
water. In most cases, resident flora are not likely to be associated with infections; however, the hands
or fingernails of some HCWs can become colonized by microorganisms that do cause infection (e.g.,
Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilli, or yeast), which can be transmitted to patients.
Respirator fit testing is a test protocol conducted to verify that a respirator is both comfortable
and correctly fits the user without leakage. Fit testing uses a test agent, either qualitatively detected
by the wearer’s sense of taste, smell, or involuntary cough (irritant smoke), or quantitatively
measured by an instrument to verify the respirator’s fit. The benefits of this testing include better
protection for the HCW/user and verification that the user is wearing a correctly fitting model and
size of respirator.
Respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette are measures taken to prevent transmission of respiratory
infections, including influenza, in healthcare facilities. They involve maintaining at least a one-
meter (three-foot) distance from other individuals in common waiting areas, covering the
mouth/nose when sneezing/coughing, performing hand hygiene after soiling hands with
respiratory secretions, and placing visual alerts to remind HCWs, patients, and visitors to practice
respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette.
Risk: The likelihood or possibility that harm (injury, illness, death, damage, etc.) may occur from
exposure to a hazard.
RNA, ribonucleic acid, is present in all living cells and many viruses. RNA molecules are involved
in protein synthesis and sometimes in the transmission of genetic information.
Safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the HCW to any avoidable
risks, is provided by a skilled person using appropriate injection equipment, and does not result in
waste that is dangerous for the community.
Sanitary landfill is an engineering method used for disposing of solid waste on land in a manner
that protects the environment (e.g., by spreading the waste in thin layers, compacting it to the
smallest practical volume, and then covering it with soil at the end of each workday).
Sanitizer is a chemical that reduces the number of bacterial contaminants on inanimate objects to
safe levels based on public health requirements (i.e., a chemical that kills 99.999% of the specific
test bacteria in 30 seconds under the conditions of the test). It is used in food service but not for
cleaning surfaces in healthcare facilities.
Scrubbing (frictional cleaning) is the vigorous rubbing of a surface with a brush or other tool.
This is the best way to physically remove dirt, debris, and microorganisms.
Seal check is a procedure conducted by the wearer of a particulate respirator to determine whether
the respirator is properly sealed to the face. The user seal check can be either a positive pressure
check (i.e., breathing out to check for leak on exhalation), or negative pressure check (i.e.,
breathing in to check for leak on inhalation), or both.
Glossary 22
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Sewerage is the system for the collection and transport of human excrement and accompanying
water used in toilet systems (sewage). The system includes conduits (channels), pipes (sewers),
and pumping stations.
Sharps are instruments, needles, and any other objects that can easily penetrate through the skin.
Sharps injuries are injuries from a “sharp” penetrating the skin. “Sharps” include syringe needles,
scalpels, broken glass, and other objects that may be contaminated with blood or body fluids. These
injuries potentially expose HCWs to infections from bloodborne pathogens.
Sharps injury prevention strategies are measures taken to prevent injuries when handling sharps.
These measures include elimination of hazards, and the use of engineering controls, administrative
controls, workspace practices, and PPE.
Sharps safety and needle safety are procedures used to handle needles and other sharp devices
in a manner that will prevent injury and exposure from infectious agents during routine patient
care.
Sharps waste includes used or unused sharps (e.g., hypodermic, intravenous, or other needles,
auto-disable syringes, syringes with attached needles, infusion sets, scalpels, pipettes, knives,
blades, and broken glass).
Single-use or single-dose vial is a vial of liquid medication intended for parenteral administration
(injection or infusion) that is meant for use in a single patient for a single case/procedure/injection.
Single-use or single-dose vials are labeled as such by the manufacturer and do not contain
antimicrobial preservative.
Soap (term is used interchangeably with detergent) is a cleaning product (e.g., bar, liquid, leaflet, or
powder) that lowers surface tension of water, thereby helping to remove dirt and debris. Plain soaps
do not claim to be antimicrobial on their labels and require friction (i.e., scrubbing) to mechanically
remove microorganisms. Antiseptic (antimicrobial) soaps kill or inhibits the growth of most
microorganisms.
Soaps and detergents (terms used interchangeably) are cleaning products (bar, liquid, leaflet,
or powder) that lower surface tension, thereby helping remove dirt, debris, and transient
microorganisms from hands, utensils, equipment, etc.
Soiled or contaminated textile is a cloth item coming from multiple sources in a hospital or clinic
that has been collected and brought to the laundry for processing.
Sorting is a process of inspecting and removing foreign and, in some cases, dangerous objects
(e.g., sharps or broken glass) from soiled textiles before washing. This step is extremely important
because soiled textiles from the operating room or clinic have occasionally been found to contain
sharps (e.g., scalpels, sharp-tipped scissors, hypodermic and suture needles, and towel clips).
Source person is the person who is (either identified or not identified as) the possible source of
contamination through potentially infectious blood or body fluid. If the serostatus of the source
Glossary 23
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
person is unknown, he or she may be asked to provide informed consent to HIV testing. The source
person may be a patient if an HCW is the one who is exposed (in occupational exposure).
Species refers to the taxonomic/biological classification system of microorganism; all species have
a two-part name, called a binomial (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus). The first name is the generic
name— genus—(e.g., Staphylococcus), the second name is the species (e.g., aureus), based on
structural and biochemical characteristics. A species can have different strains and subgroups that
can cause different diseases. Some organisms of medical interest are classified below the species
level, based on their characteristics (e.g., Escherichia coli O157:H7, a strain that produces Shiga-
like toxin).
Staining is a technique that uses dyes to color the cell wall of bacteria to quickly identify it in a
broad group of bacteria. Staining methods involve fixing bacteria cells to a glass slide and then
staining and washing them with a dye and alcohol. The differing characteristics of a
microorganism’s cell wall cause the stain to be retained in the cell or not, resulting in color
changes. For example, Gram stain is used to differentiate bacteria into two groups, gram positive
and gram negative; acid-fast stain is used to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Standard precautions are a set of infection control practices used for every patient encounter to
reduce the risk of transmission of bloodborne and other pathogens from both recognized and
unrecognized sources. They are the basic level of infection control practices to be used, at a
minimum, in preventing the spread of infectious agents to all individuals in the healthcare facility.
Sterilants are chemicals used to destroy all forms of microorganisms, including endospores. Most
sterilants are also HLDs when used for a shorter period of time. These chemicals are applied only
on inanimate objects (e.g., surgical instruments) that are used in semi-critical and critical areas (e.g.,
surgery). It should be noted that they are not meant to be used for cleaning environmental surfaces.
Sterilization: A process that eliminates all microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi, and
parasites), including bacterial endospores, from inanimate objects by high-pressure steam
(autoclave), dry heat (oven), chemical sterilization, or radiation.
Strain is a variation in members of the same bacterial species. For treatment and epidemiology, it
may be helpful for clinical laboratories to distinguish between strains in the same species. For
example, some strains of E. coli are harmless and play an important role in the human intestinal
tract, but other strains can cause diarrhea. Tests, such as PCR, can identify strains.
Surfactant is an agent that reduces the surface tension of water, or the tension at the interface
between water and another liquid, and a wetting agent found in many sterilants and disinfectants.
Surgical hand preparation refers to the protocol used preoperatively by surgical teams to
eliminate transient flora and reduce resident skin flora. The process involves an antiseptic
handwash or antiseptic hand rub and rubbing/scrubbing for specific amounts of time using specific
techniques before putting on gloves. Antiseptics used for surgical hand preparation often have
persistent antimicrobial activity.
Surgical hand scrub refers to surgical hand preparation with antimicrobial soap and water.
Glossary 24
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Surgical unit is a whole surgical area including lockers and dressing rooms; preoperative and
recovery rooms; peripheral support areas, including storage space for sterile and high-level
disinfected items; other consumable supplies and corridors leading to restricted areas; the
operating room(s); scrub sink areas; and the nursing station.
Syndromic approach is an approach that bases preventive actions on a set of signs and symptoms
that are suggestive of a clinical condition rather than a specific diagnosis. The symptoms could be
related to multiple systems or organs.
Terminal or discharge cleaning is the process used to clean a patient’s room after the patient has
been discharged or transferred or to clean patient treatment areas, including operating theaters at
the end of the day.
Textiles are cloth items used in healthcare facilities by housekeeping staff (bedding and towels),
cleaning staff (cleaning cloths, gowns, and caps), and surgical personnel (caps, masks, scrub suits,
surgical gowns, drapes, and wrappers) and staff of specialty units, such as intensive care units
(ICUs) and other units, performing invasive medical procedures (e.g., anesthesiology,radiology,
or cardiology).
Transient flora are microorganisms acquired through contact with individuals or contaminated
surfaces during the course of normal, daily activities. They live in the upper layers of the skin and
are more amenable to removal by hand hygiene. They are the microorganisms most likely to cause
HAIs.
Transmission-based precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used
in addition to standard precautions for patients who may be infected or colonized with certain
infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission.
Vaccine-preventable diseases are infectious diseases for which effective vaccines are available.
They include but are not limited to HAV and HBV, influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus,
diphtheria, pertussis, and varicella (chicken pox).
Waste management includes all activities—administrative and operational (including
transportation activities)—involved in the handling of waste: generation, collection, transport,
storage, and disposal of waste.
Waste segregation is the systematic separation of healthcare waste into designated categories
according to the type of composition and hazards to enhance the safety and efficiency of waste
handling and disposal.
Water-based diseases are those transmitted through aquatic vectors (such as schistosomiasis).
Waterborne diseases are those transmitted through drinking water contamination (such as
typhoid, cholera, gastroenteritis, etc.).
Water-related diseases are those spread by insects that depend on water (malaria and yellow fever).
Water-washed diseases are those diseases caused by the shortage of adequate water for personal
hygiene.
Glossary 25
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Key Topics
Goal of IPC
WHO core components of IPC
The infection chain/cycle and breaking the chain of infection
Introduction to HAIs
Background on standard precautions and transmission-based precautions
Background on clean and asepsis techniques
BACKGROUND
IPC is essential for the delivery of safe and quality healthcare services. Infections are a major
health threat globally. They can affect anyone. HCWs have a critical role to play in the prevention
and control of infections at all levels of care. The nature of their work increases their chances of
acquiring or transmitting infectious agents. In healthcare settings, the risk for infection is usually
high due to such factors as the presence of a wide range of infectious agents (including resistant
strains) from various sources, the weakened immunity of patients, and invasive and other high-
risk procedures. HAIs are the most frequent adverse events in healthcare delivery systems
worldwide. They are a major cause of preventable diseases, deaths, and greater healthcare costs.
The application of evidence-based IPC practices in all healthcare settings is key. The remainder of
this chapter introduces readers to the basic principles of IPC, with the aim of laying the foundation
for the chapters in the rest of the manual.
The goal of IPC is to make healthcare facilities safe for all, including patients, clinical and non-
clinical staff of healthcare facilities, and the community.
established IPC program and an adequately built environment and IP supplies—support the
effective implementation of IPC guidelines, training and education, program monitoring, audit,
feedback, and surveillance. Implementation success in each of these areas also depends on the
adoption of a multimodal approach, that is, a strategy consisting of several elements implemented
in an integrated way with the aim of improving an outcome and changing behavior.
WHO’s core components of an IPC program at the healthcare facility level comprises thefollowing
eight core components. The first six are especially relevant for the national level, whereas all eight
components apply to healthcare facilities.
Table 1.1. WHO core components of IPC
S. No. Component Recommendation
1 IPC programs An IPC and PS program with a dedicated, trained team should be in
place in each acute healthcare facility for the purpose of preventing
HAIs and combating AMR through IPC good practices.
o Asymptomatic or passive carriers: Those who have never been ill from the
infection.
o Incubatory carriers: Those who are in the incubation period of the disease.
o Convalescent carriers: Those who have recovered from the infection.
o Chronic carriers: Those who remain as reservoirs for the disease causing agents for
as long as years after they have had the infection.
3. Portal of Exit: This is a gateway through which the agent leaves the host or reservoir.
However, the agent must have the right environment for its survival until it gets an entry to
infect another person/animal. For example, the bacteria that cause tuberculosis (TB)
can survive in sputum for weeks, but can be killed by sunlight within a few hours.
4. Mode of Transmission: An agent that exits and develops in its natural reservoir can be
transmitted in numerous ways to a susceptible host and get portal of entry. The modes of
transmission are classified as:
Direct transmission refers to an immediate transfer of the agent from a reservoir to a
susceptible host through direct contact or a droplet.
Direct c ontact occurs through kissing, skin-to-skin contact, and sexual
intercourse.
o Direct contact also refers to contact with soil or vegetation harboring infectious
organisms. Infections, such as mononucleosis (“kissing disease”) and gonorrhea,
are contracted from direct contact with an infected person. Likewise, hookworm
infection is acquired through direct contact with contaminated soil.
Droplet spread refers to a spray of relatively large, short-range germ laden aerosols
produced by sneezing and/or coughing (or even talking) of infected people. Droplet
spread is classified as direct because transmission is by direct spray over a few
feet before the droplets fall to the ground.
Indirect transmission: An agent is carried from a reservoir to the susceptible host by
suspended air particles or by animate (vector) or inanimate (vehicle) intermediaries.
o Airborne
o Vehicle-borne
o Vector borne
o Mechanical
o Biologic
This manual deals primarily with preventing the spread of infectious diseases taking
place in healthcare facilities from contacts with such sources as air (airborne and
droplets), blood or body fluids, and contaminated foods or articles.
5. Portal of entry is the gateway through which an infectious agent enters in the susceptible
host. The portals of entry could be the mouth, nose, skin, etc.
Figure 1.3 illustrates how to break or interrupt the chain of infection through IPC practices.
Failure to apply IPC measures in healthcare settings can increase the risk for HAIs.
Healthcare-Associated Infections
HAIs were previously known as hospital-acquired infections and nosocomial infections. An
infection is called “healthcare-associated” if it is acquired during the course of a healthcare
intervention for other conditions, regardless of where the interventions are provided, or infections
acquired while a patient is under hospital care (or in any other health facility), which are not present
or incubating at the time of admission. It is a time-related criterion that refers to infections
occurring more than 48 hours after admission. This situation, therefore, is inclusive of infections
acquired in the hospital but which appear after discharge, and also occupational infections among
the staff of the facility.
HAIs may be endogenous (from self) where the infectious agent is from the patient, such as the
normal flora that causes disease as a result of gaining access to another part of the body where it
is not normally found; for example, an organism from the colon entering the urinary tract and
causing a urinary tract infection.
HAIs may also be exogenous (from others or cross infection). This involves acquiring infection
from an external source; for example, a patient or health worker, through contaminated hands, or
contaminated patient care items, or the environment.
Some of the most common HAIs are urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, surgical site
infections, and pneumonia.
IP practices are crucial for reducing the risk for any type of HAI with the application of an
understanding of the chain of infection or transmission cycle. The two sets of practices for IP are
standard precautions and transmission-based precautions.
In all cases (whether they are being used alone or in combination), transmission-b ased
precautions must be used in conjunction with the standard precautions.
The goal of the aseptic technique is to eliminate germs entirely. The goal of the clean technique is
to reduce the number of germs whenever possible.
Clean techniques are important for all healthcare providers and their patients because they prevent
infections every day.
Examples of clean techniques include washing hands and putting on clean gloves when needed.
Healthcare providers keep a patient’s surroundings as clean as possible, but they are not using
sterile items or aseptic techniques.
Asepsis and aseptic techniques are the combination of efforts made to prevent entry of
microorganisms into any area of the body where they are likely to cause infection. The goal of
asepsis is to reduce to a safe level, or eliminate, the number of microorganisms on both animate
(living) surfaces (skin and mucous membranes) and inanimate objects (surgical instruments and
other items).
Keeping the environment as clean as possible is always important in preventing infections.
However, some situations call for aseptic technique, whereas others call for clean techniques.
SUMMARY
In summary, the goal of IPC is to make healthcare facilities a safer place. WHO’s components of
IPC are an integral part of these guidelines. Understanding each step of the chain of infection or
transmission cycle is one step forward in the prevention and control of HAIs. Always apply
standard precautions and transmission-based precautions, as appropriate. IP and PS activities are
everybody’s responsibility. Each and every one of us have a responsibility to implement IPC and PS
activities at our healthcare facilities.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
Alhumaid S, Al Mutair A, Al Alawi Z, et al. 2021. Knowledge of infection prevention and control among
healthcare workers and factors influencing compliance: a systematic review. Antimicrobial Resistance &
Infection Control, 10:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00957-0.
Alvarado, CJ. 2000. The science of hand hygiene: A self–study monograph. University of Wisconsin
Medical School and SCI –health Communication, 21: 231‒233.
Baker, GR, Northon, PG, Flintoft, V, et al. 2004. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of
adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal,
170(11):1678‒1686. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/170/11/1678.
Baker, JL, Kelen, GD, Sivertson, KT, et al. 1987. Unsuspected human immunodeficiency virus in critically
ill emergency patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 257(19):2609‒2611.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/366125.
Bouvet, E. 1993. Risk for health professionals of infection with human immunodeficiency virus.
Current knowledge and development in preventive measures. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 23:28‒
33.
Brennan, TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. 1991. Incidence of adverse events & negligence in hospitalized
patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(6):370‒
376. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm199102073240604.
Burke, HF, Quinby, WC, Bondoc, CC, et al. 1977. The contribution of a bacterially isolated environment to
the infection prevention in seriously burned patients. Annals of Surgery, 186(3): 377‒385.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1396349/.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 1985. Recommendations for preventing transmission of infection with
human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus in the workplace. MMWR, 34(45):
682‒686; 691‒695. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00033093.htm.
Curless, MS, Ruparelia, CS, Thompson, E, et al., eds. 2018. Infection prevention and control: Reference
manual for health care facilities with limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego.
http://resources.jhpiego.org/resources/infection-prevention-and-control-reference-manual-health-care-
facilities-limited-resources.
Garner, JS. 1996. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17(1): 53‒80.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8789689/.
Geberding, JL. 1990. Current epidemiologic evidence and case reports of occupationally acquired HIV
and other blood borne diseases. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 11(Suppl): 558‒560.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/2230046.
Gershon, RR, Vlahov, D, Felk nor, SA, et al. 1995. Compliance with universal precautions among
healthcare workers at three regional hospitals. American Journal of Infection Control, 23(4): 225‒236.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7503434/.
Haque, M, Sartelli, M, McKimm, J, Abu Bakar, M. 2018. Health care-associated infections - an overview.
Infection and Drug Resistance, 11:2321-2333. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30532565/
Lanphear, B. 1994. Trends and patterns in the transmission of blood borne pathogens to healthcare
workers. Epidemiological Review, 16(2):437‒450. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7713188/.
McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc. 2021. Break the chain of infection with these hand hygiene best
practices. https://mms.mckesson.com/resources/infection-prevention/hand-hygiene-best-practices.
Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, Ministry of Medical Services. 2010. National infection prevention
and control guidelines for health care services in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.
http://guidelines.health.go.ke:8000/media/infection_control_policy.pdf.
New Zealand Ministry of Health. 2001. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals: Principal findings
from a national survey. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/adverse-events-new-zealand-public-
hospitals-principal-findings-national-survey.
Public Health Ontario. n.d. Chain of transmission and risk assessment: Summary.
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/I/2019/ipac-core-trainers-cot-summary.pdf.
Shaw, K. 2016. Prevention by breaking the chain of infection. Nursing Times, 112, 39/40: 12-14.
https://www.nursingtimes.net/clinical-archive/infection-control/prevention-by-breaking-the-chain-of-
infection-10-10-2016/
Tietjen, L, Bossemeyer, D, & McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention guidelines for healthcare facilities
with limited resources. Baltimore, MD: JHPIEGO. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf
van Seventer, JM. & Hochberg NS. 2017. Principles of infectious diseases: Transmission, diagnosis,
prevention, and control. International Encyclopedia of Public Health (second edition), 22–39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00516-6
World Health Organization (WHO). 2020. Core competencies for infection prevention and control
professionals. Geneva: WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/335821.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2022. Global report on infection prevention and control. Geneva:
WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240051164
World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and
control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: WHO.
https://www.who.int/gpsc/ipc-components-guidelines/en/.
Key Topics
Basic features of microorganisms
Classifications and identification of microorganisms
How microorganisms cause disease
Common techniques for identifying microorganisms
Characteristics of microorganisms of interest for IPC
BACKGROUND
A basic knowledge of the microscopic organisms that commonly cause infections and the methods
used by the clinical laboratory to identify and examine them are important in the day-to-day work
of the IPC team. Understanding the features and behavior of the microorganisms that are causing
infections in a healthcare facility, in particular HAIs, can help the IPC team choose the most
effective prevention strategy. It will also help IPC focal persons to more effectively convince
HCWs of the need for basic IPC strategies, such as hand hygiene, standard precautions,
transmission-based precautions, cleaning, and disinfection. Understanding the methods used in the
clinical laboratory can also assist the IPC team in making sure that the best-quality samples are
taken so that the microorganisms that are causing infection can be identified.
Source: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) 2014b
Bacteria
Characteristics
Bacteria are single-cell organisms (figure 2.1) with a well-defined cell wall that maintains the
shape of the cell and protects an underlying structure called the plasma membrane, which
surrounds and encloses the contents of the cell, including:
Cytoplasm, which contains the other cell contents
Bacteria reproduce by cell division; a cell divides into two identical cells. When artificially grown
on an appropriate culture medium, new cells form groups of the same species and strain of bacteria,
called colonies, which may be seen with the naked eye.
Morphology (forms and structure) of bacteria cells is used to identify and classify different
groups of bacteria. Given the small size of these microorganisms, they can be viewed and
recognized only under a microscope, based on their size, shape, and how they are grouped together.
Figure 2.3 shows some of the different shapes and groupings of bacteria that can be seen under the
microscope.
Coccus: Staphylococcus aureus
Rods (bacilli): E. coli, K. pneumoniae
Spiral: Treponema pallidum pertenue
Staining of the cell walls with different dyes is also used to identify and classify bacteria (Figure
2.4). Gram stain is widely used in clinical laboratories to differentiate bacteria into two groups:
gram positive and gram negative. Nearly all clinically relevant bacteria fall into one of these two
groups based on whether their cell walls retain Gram stain. Another clinically relevant group of
bacteria are acid-fast bacilli (AFB). Gram stain quickly determines a broad group of bacteria,
which can be important for choosing the appropriate antibiotic to treat the infection and for
determining the need for isolation of the patient. For example, gram-negative diplococci in
cerebrospinal fluid suggest meningococcal meningitis, and gram-positive cocci suggest
staphylococci as the cause of infection. AFB-positive rods suggest Mycobacterium spp., which
may be TB (APIC 2014b).
Gram stain can also help the IPC team focus and guide IPC activities. For example, gram-positive
bacteria include S. aureus, which commonly colonizes the skin and the nose of staff and patients.
S. aureus is often resistant to antibiotics, can cause serious infections in the lungs, bones, and heart,
and can also result in sepsis.
Figure 2.4. Bacterial classification by staining properties
Viruses
Characteristics
Viruses are microorganisms that are smaller than bacteria and consist of genetic material, which
can be either DNA or RNA, surrounded by a protein coat and, in some viruses, by a membranous
envelope. Viruses do not have many of the cell structures found in bacteria and fungi, and are able
to multiply only in the living cells of a host (figure 2.5.) They attach to receptors on the host cell
(such as a respiratory tract cell), enter the cell, and use the cell to replicate. The offspring are then
released from the host cell.
Viruses are classified based on:
The type of substance that makes up their central core—DNA (e.g., herpesvirus,
cytomegalovirus) or RNA (e.g., HIV, measles, Ebola Virus Disease [EVD], severe
acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus [SARS-CoV], HCV, and polio).
The number of strands in the core—double-stranded (e.g., rotavirus) or single-stranded.
The presence or absence of a membrane-like envelope surrounding them—enveloped
(coronaviruses [CoVs], herpesvirus, chicken pox virus, influenza viruses, and EVD)
and non-enveloped viruses (adenovirus, poliovirus) (APIC 2014b).
Fungi
Characteristics
Fungi are typically slightly larger than bacteria and can be divided into yeasts and molds based on
their appearance.
Yeasts are single-celled, microscopic, and form smooth, creamy colonies in culture
(figure 2.6).
Molds consist of long, branching filaments of cells called hyphae. A tangled mass of
hyphae visible to the naked eye is a mycelium and can be various colors (black, white,
or green) (APIC 2014b).
Figure 2.6. Candida albicans
Parasites
Characteristics
Parasites range from single-cell protozoan parasites (Giardia spp. and Plasmodium spp.) to large
worms (e.g., hookworm) and insects (Sarcoptes scabiei, the scabies parasite). Some parasites can
live inside the cell (intracellular), such as the parasite that causes malaria (Plasmodium spp.)
(figure 2.7). Others (such as scabies, mites, and lice) live on the outside the body, on the skin. Most
protozoan parasites exist in two different forms:
The trophozoite stage—the feeding stage during which the parasite produces effects in
the host.
The cyst stage—the dormant stage, when most protozoan parasites are transmitted.
Colonization
Examples of colonization include Neisseria meningitidis in the throat, Salmonella species in the
gut, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in the nose, or yeast in the genital tract.
Implications for Healthcare: Colonization may result in infection of the colonized person when
the immune or other body defenses are interrupted (e.g., a person colonized with MRSA has
surgery, which interrupts the natural barrier of the skin, and develops a MRSA surgical site
infection [SSI]). Transmission to others (e.g., a person with Salmonella colonization is involved
with food preparation at the healthcare facility and does not wash his/her hands and transmits
Salmonella to patients).
Organisms that are resistant to antibiotics often colonize hospitalized patients, which can then lead
to infections that are difficult to treat. Surveillance cultures (such as nose swabs for MRSA and
rectal swabs for vancomycin-resistant enterococci [VRE] or carbapenem-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae [CRE]) may be used in some settings to identify patients with colonization. If
colonization with MRSA, which can cause serious SSIs, is identified before surgery from
surveillance cultures of the nose (or other sites), medications to decolonize can be prescribed to
decrease the risk of an SSI from MRSA.
Infection
An infection usually causes clinically apparent symptoms, or sometimes may cause no symptoms
and be subclinical. Symptoms vary according to the type of microorganism and the location of the
infection. Symptoms are a result of the actions of the microorganisms on the body (e.g., diarrhea,
necrotic tissue) and the immune response to them (e.g., fever, purulence). The characteristics and
location of the microorganism, and the immune status of the person determine if and how an
infection progresses (APIC 2014b).
Implications for Healthcare: People seeking care at healthcare facilities may be more vulnerable
and prone to infections, especially infants, pregnant women, the elderly, people with acute or
chronic diseases, and those with a condition that suppresses the immune system and/or disrupts
body defenses (wounds, invasive medical devices). It is important to protect patients fromexposure
to pathogenic microorganisms in the facility and identify any patients with infections that may
spread to others.
Sources of Microorganisms
HAIs can be categorized according to the source of the microorganisms that cause them. Bacteria
can come from:
The patient (endogenous): Organisms from the individual’s own body (normal flora or
colonization) can cause infection when the immune system is compromised, other body
defenses are interrupted (via a wound or medical device), or antibiotic therapy causes
overgrowth of some microorganisms (such as yeast in the gastrointestinal and
reproductive tracts) (APIC 2014b; WHO 2002).
Implications for healthcare: IPC includes surgical asepsis; preoperative skin antisepsis;
preventive care when inserting and maintaining invasive medical devices; removal of
invasive medical devices as soon as possible; decolonization of colonized patients using
an appropriate antimicrobial agent; patient education on hand hygiene and cleanliness;
and rational use of antibiotics.
Another person (exogenous infection): Organisms that cause infection can come
from a source outside the individual, such as:
o Other patients (direct contact with blood or other body fluids, respiratory droplets,
unwashed hands)
o Airborne (aerosols/air droplets carrying TB, varicella, or measles)
o Staff (contaminated or colonized hands, clothing, skin)
o Objects contaminated by an infected person (equipment, environmental surfaces) or
contaminated sources (water, fluids, food) (APIC 2014b; WHO 2002).
Implications for Healthcare: IPC includes standard precautions, including hand hygiene
and use of PPE, and isolation using transmission-based precautions. Administrative and
environmental controls should also be considered.
The healthcare environment: Organisms causing infection can come from the
hospital environment where they live permanently or transiently, including such places
as:
o Water, damp areas, fluids, and even disinfectants (e.g., Pseudomonas spp.,
Acinetobacter spp., Mycobacterium spp., Legionella spp.).
o Surfaces, equipment, supplies, and patient care items if reused and/or not well-
cleaned.
o Food prepared or stored by the hospital or the patients’ families.
o Dust/soil, such as during construction or renovation of the facility (e.g., Aspergillus
spp.) (APIC 2014b; WHO 2002).
Implications for healthcare: IPC includes proper handling of fluids, correct handling
and dilution of disinfectants, elimination of damp areas when possible, use of the cleanest
water available, monitoring of the food service, regular and thorough environmental
cleaning, hand hygiene, proper cleaning of multi-use items, and isolation/careful control
in areas undergoing construction/renovation.
via items contaminated with blood or body fluids—even minute amounts. Examples
include HBV, HCV, and HIV on or in dialysis machines, multi-dose vials, multi-use
lancets, or insulin pens; and EVD on the hands, equipment, and surfaces that are not
adequately cleaned.
Thrive in damp areas, and thus the drains, sinks, and equipment that use water (such
as humidifiers, patient warmers, and respiratory equipment) can harbor these
organisms. Fluids used in healthcare, such as IV fluids and disinfectants, can also grow
microorganisms. Examples include Mycobacterium spp. and gram-negative bacteria
such as Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Burkholderia spp., and
Enterobacteriaceae.
Colonize patients and staff, allowing the microorganisms to survive in the healthcare
environment and pass from person to person, causing an infection if the immune
defenses become suboptimal, such as after surgery or when medical devices are in
place. Examples include S. aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, and Enterococcus spp.
Are small in size and able to remain suspended in the air and be transmitted short
distances through the air in respiratory droplets, especially when propelled by
coughing or sneezing, and therefore can cause transmission if PPE to protect the nose,
mouth, and eyes—as described for standard precautions and transmission-based
precautions—are inadequate. Examples include influenza and N. meningitidis.
Are very small in size and so are able to float long distances on air currents if the
ventilation at the facility is not protective of staff and patients. Examples include the
viruses causing varicella, measles, and SARS.
Are resistant to antimicrobials; examples include MRSA, VRE, and CRE (CDC
2019a).
These characteristics help determine which microorganisms commonly cause HAIs. The causes of
HAIs are generally similar, no matter the country or region (table 2.2), although gram-negative
organisms are more likely to be the most common cause of bloodstream infection in middle- and
low-resource settings than in high-income settings. A knowledge of the specific microbes and the
microbial patterns of infection in the specific facility (from surveillance), country (from the health
department or published articles), or region (from combined data) can be helpful in guiding IPC
efforts at a facility (Mahon, Lehman, Manuselis 2014; WHO 2011).
Table 2.2. Microorganisms that cause the four HAIs of global public health interest
HAI Microorganisms that cause HAIs
Central line-associated Coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, Enterococcus
bloodstream infection spp., Candida species, MRSA, Klebsiella pneumonia,
Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Surgical site infection S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus
spp., E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter species, K.
pneumoniae and oxytoca, Candida spp., Acinetobacter
Baumannii
Catheter-associated E. coli, Enterococcus spp., P. aeruginosa, Candida
urinary tract infection spp., K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp.
Gram-Negative Bacteria
HAIs caused by gram-negative bacteria include pneumonia, bloodstream infections, wound or
SSIs, and meningitis. Gram-negative bacteria are often resistant to antibiotics. This group, which
includes Klebsiella spp., Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and E. coli, among many
others, is found in damp areas and is transmitted via the unwashed hands of HCWs, water sources,
and inadequately cleaned medical equipment. Careful attention to IPC practices, such as standard
precautions, including hand hygiene and proper environmental cleaning, reduces the risk of
patients acquiring infections.
Enterobacteriaceae are a group consisting of several families of gram-negative
bacteria, many of which are normally present in the gut, including E. coli, and species
of Proteus, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and Serratia. However, patients
whose care requires medical devices (endotracheal tubes, urinary catheters, or IV
catheters) and those who are on long courses of antibiotics are at risk of developing
localized or bloodstream infections with these organisms. Members of this group can
cause gastrointestinal illness (e.g., Shigella, Salmonella, and Yersinia).
Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare settings are of particular concern because they have
become resistant to most or all available antibiotics and pass this resistance along to
other bacteria. Similar to other gram-negative organisms, prevention includes cleaning,
preventing damp areas, and paying careful attention to IPC measures, such as standard
precautions and hand hygiene. The rational use of antimicrobials is also a critical
component. Contact precautions may be warranted for known cases of multidrug-
resistant colonization or infection (CDC 2019a; WHO 2002).
Acinetobacter species are commonly found in water and soil but infections with this
organism rarely occur in the community. Outbreaks of pneumonia and blood and
wound infections in hospitals, including ICUs, are usually caused by Acinetobacter
baumannii. Acinetobacter spp. can also colonize patients (such as those on a ventilator,
with wounds, or with a long hospital stay) and spread to other patients. Prevention
includes cleaning, preventing damp areas, and paying careful attention to IPC
practices, such as standard precautions, including hand hygiene and environmental
cleaning (CDC 2019a; WHO 2002).
Pseudomonas infection is caused by strains of bacteria found in the healthcare
environment, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although P. aeruginosa can cause
infections in the community (such as ear and eye infections), serious infections usually
occur in healthcare settings. Patients with weak immune systems, those with medical
devices (endotracheal tubes, urinary catheters, or IV catheters), and those with wounds
from surgery or from burns are at risk for life-threatening infections. Prevention
includes cleaning, preventing damp areas, and paying careful attention to IPC
Gram-Positive Bacteria
Gram-positive bacteria often cause infections in healthcare settings. These bacteria have sturdy
cell walls and are therefore capable of surviving for longer periods on surfaces in the healthcare
environment and on the skin (WHO 2002).
Staphylococcus aureus is found on the skin and in the nasal passages of about 30% of
people. It causes skin infections in the community; however, in healthcare settings, S.
aureus can cause serious and life-threatening infections, such as pneumonia, sepsis,
endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and SSI. Patients with weak immune systems, those with
medical devices (endotracheal tubes, urinary catheters, or IV catheters), and those with
chronic conditions, such as diabetes or cancer, are at risk. S. aureus can become
resistant to antibiotics, making the infections more difficult to treat (specifically the
group of beta-lactam antibiotics that include methicillin, oxacillin, penicillin, and
amoxicillin). These are known as MRSA. Prevention includes careful attention to IPC
practices, such as standard precautions, including hand hygiene and environmental
cleaning, and excellent asepsis of the skin before procedures. Contact precautions may
be warranted for known cases of MRSA (CDC 2019a; WHO 2002).
Bone and joint Osteomyelitis: S. aureus, Salmonella sp., Pseudomonas sp., Streptococcus
infections agalactiae, Septic arthritis: S. aureus, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, S. pneumoniae,
S. pyogenes
Endocarditis/ St. viridans, S. aureus, Enterococcus spp., Haemophilus spp., S. epidermidis,
heart valve Candida spp.
Gastroenteritis/ Salmonella sp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp., E. coli O157:H7, viruses, G.
intestines lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, Yersinia spp., Vibrio spp., C. difficile
SUMMARY
Microorganisms that IPC staff may encounter in healthcare facilities include bacteria, fungi,
parasites, and viruses. Collaboration with the clinical laboratory can increase the IPC team’s
capacity to identify, investigate, and contain infectious diseases.
Knowledge of the microorganisms that cause HAIs, and the methods used to identify them, are
important in the day-to-day work of an IPC team and will help improve PS at the facility. The IPC
team needs to aware of, and knowledgeable about, the basic characteristics of microorganisms that
cause HAIs, and should be familiar with the characteristics of those organisms that are significant
in their setting and patient population.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 2: BASIC MICROBIOLOGY FOR IPC
American Thoracic Society Documents. 2005. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-
acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory
and Critical Care Medicine, 171:388–416. https://www.thoracic.org/statements/resources/mtpi/guide1-
29.pdf.
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). 2012. The infection
preventionist’s guide to the lab. Washington, DC: APIC.
https://www.icpsne.org/APIC%20Inf%20Prev%20Guide%20to%20Lab%202012.pdf.
APIC. 2014a. Infectious disease disasters: bioterrorism, emerging infections, and pandemics (Chapter
120). In: APIC text of infection control and epidemiology, 4th ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
https://apic.org/Resource_/TinyMceFileManager/Topic-specific/47901_CH120_R1.pdf.
APIC. 2014b. Microbiology (Chapter 24). In: APIC text of infection control and epidemiology, 4th ed.
Washington, DC: APIC. https://text.apic.org/toc/microbiology-and-risk-factors-for-
transmission/microbiology-basics.
Bagheri, NS, Allegranzi, B, Syed SB,, et al. 2011. Healthcare-associated infection in Africa: a systematic
review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89:757–765.
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/10/11-088179/en/.
Baron, EJ. 1996. Classification (Chapter 3). In: Baron S, ed. Medical microbiology, 4th ed. Galveston, TX:
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7627/.
Brooks, K. 2012. Ready reference for microbes, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
http://apic.org/Resource_/TinyMceFileManager/Store/TOC_RR_for_Microbes.pdf.
Carr, HA. 1998. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adults: prevention through care and
technology. Infection Control Today, 2(8):26–29.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/ Dr. Mae Melvin. 1971. Public Health Image Library.
https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=2193
CDC. 2011. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2011.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-H.pdf.
Griffiths, AJF, Gelbart, WM, Lewontin, RC, Miller, JH. 2002. Modern genetic analysis: Integrating genes
and genomes, 2nd ed. New York, NY: WH Freeman.
Hidron, AI, Edwards, JR, Patel, J, et al. 2008. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens
associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National
Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infection
Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 29(11):996–1011. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18947320/.
Mahon, CR, Lehman, DC, Manuselis, G. 2014. Textbook of diagnostic microbiology, 5th ed. New York:
Saunders.
Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Committee. 2008. Guideline for
disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008, updated 2019.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines-H.pdf.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: A practical guide,
2nd ed. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/drugresist/WHO_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002_12/en/.
WHO. 2009. Core components for infection prevention and control programmes: Report of the second
meeting, Informal Network on Infection Prevention and Control in Health Care, Geneva, Switzerland, 26–
27 June 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/WHO_HSE_EPR_2009_1/en/.
WHO. 2011. Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/80135/1/9789241501507_eng.pdf.
Key Topics
Key components of standard precautions
Key components of transmission-based precautions
Empiric/syndromic use of transmission-based precautions
Recommended precautions for each route of infection transmission
BACKGROUND
Standard precautions for infection control guidelines issued by the CDC in 1996 involves two levels
of approaches: standard precautions and transmission-based precautions. Standard precautions
combine the major features of universal precaution and body substance isolation. The basic concept
in the implementation of standard precautions is the maintenance of a physical, mechanical, or
chemical barrier among microorganisms, the environment, and an individual, thus breaking the
disease transmission cycle. The rationale is that, for transmission to occur in the healthcare setting, all
elements in the disease transmission cycle must be present (as discussed in Chapter 1: Introduction to
IPC). Whether it is a woman coming for antenatal care, a hospitalized patient, or a HCW caring for
patients, standard precautions help prevent the spread of bloodborne pathogens, respiratory viruses
(e.g., HBV, HCV, HIV, and influenza), and other infectious diseases in healthcare facilities.
Standard Precautions
Standard precautions are a set of guidelines designed to create a physical, chemical, and mechanical
protective barrier between a microorganism and a person to prevent the spread of infection (the barrier
serves to break the diseases transmission cycle).
Examples of barriers are:
Physical barrier – PPE
Mechanical barrier – HLD and sterilization
Chemical barrier – antiseptic and disinfectant
Standard precautions are first-level precautions. The aim of standard precautions is to reduce the risk
of transmitting microorganisms from known or unknown sources of infection (e.g., respiratory
droplet, contaminated object) in healthcare settings. Applying standard precautions while providing
patient care is based on the expected interaction a HCW will have with blood, body fluids, or potential
pathogen exposure from patients. They provide a rationale for the appropriate use of limited IPC
resources.
o Reduces the risk for transfer of pathogens to HCWs, other patients, and the
environment. (For detailed information, see Volume 1, Chapter 8: Processing Reusable
Textiles and Laundry Services.)
Healthcare waste management: Healthcare waste is a key issue to control to reduce
HAIs at healthcare facilities and to ensure that the environment is well protected.
Healthcare waste management (HCWM) should be a part of the overall management
system of a healthcare facility and should reflect the quality of the services provided by
the facility.
Transmission-Based Precautions
Although the spread of infectious disease in hospitals has been recognized for many years,
understanding about how to prevent infections and implementing successful remedial policies and
practices have not been easy to date.
Isolation guidelines involve a two-level approach: (1) Standard precautions, which apply to all clients
and patients attending healthcare facilities, on the one hand, and (2) transmission-based precautions,
which apply primarily to hospitalized patients (Garner 1996). Actually, both approaches are too
interlinked to be used separately. Therefore, the relatively specific transmission-based precautions
should always be used in conjunction with the standard precautions.
Transmission-based precautions are for patients who are known or suspected to be infected or
colonized with infectious agents, including epidemiologically important pathogens that require
additional control measures to effectively prevent transmission. Because the infectious agent is often
not known at the time of admission to a healthcare facility, transmission-based precautions are used
empirically according to the clinical syndrome and the likely etiologic agents at the time. Later,
the course of management should be modified as soon as the pathogen is identified or a transmissible
infectious etiology is ruled out.
There are three main types of transmission-based precautions:
Airborne precaution
Droplet precaution
Contact precaution
Note: For some diseases that have multiple routes of transmission, more than one transmission-based
precaution category can be used (e.g., influenza, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-coronavirus [MERS-
CoV], varicella).
When used either individually or in combination, each route of transmission-based precautions are
always used in addition to the standard precautions. When transmission-based precautions are
indicated, efforts should be made to counteract possible adverse effects on patients (i.e., anxiety,
depression, and other mood disturbances, perceptions of stigma, reduced contact with clinicalstaff,
and increases in preventable adverse events to improve acceptance by patients and adherence by
HCWs).
Airborne Precautions
Airborne precautions prevent the transmission of infectious agents that remain infectious over long
distances (particles that are five μm or less in size, can remain in the air for several hours, and can be
widely dispersed). This transmission can occur either through airborne droplet nuclei or dust particles
containing the infectious microorganisms, which can be produced by coughing, sneezing, talking, or
by procedures (e.g., bronchoscopy or suctioning). Special air handling and ventilation are needed to
ensure the prevention of airborne transmission of infectious agents. Airborne particles do not land on
and contaminate surfaces. These precautions are effective in preventing such infections as
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Chicken pox, and measles. They are recommended for patients with
either known or suspected infections that could be transmitted by airborne route. The precautions
include:
Patient Placement
Patients should be placed in airborne infection isolation room. An airborne infection isolationroom
is a single-patient room that is equipped with special air handling and ventilation capacity (i.e., a
facility that could create negative pressure relative to the surrounding area, 12 air exchanges per hour
for new construction and renovation, and six air exchanges per hour for existing facilities, air
exhausted directly to the outside). In a setting where resources are limited, the air in the room should
be exhausted to the outside using a fan or other filtration system keeping the door closed at alltimes.
If a private room is not available, place patients in a room with patients having active
infection with the same disease, but with no other infection (cohorting).
The staff on duty should check all visitors for susceptibility before allowing them to visit.
Limit movements in and out of the room to HCWs caring for the patient.
In areas where TB is prevalent, it is important to devise a mechanism to quickly assess
patients with suspected TB and put them under airborne precautions.
Respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette to prevent the spread of respiratory secretions via
droplets expelled from the respiratory tract onto the hands and surfaces. This includes:
o Cover the mouth and nose when coughing and sneezing, and dispose of used tissues in
the nearest waste container.
o Perform hand hygiene after contact with respiratory secretions and contaminated
objects.
Maintain an appropriate distance from and between symptomatic patients, at least one
meter (three feet).
Identify persons with symptoms suggestive of acute respiratory illness and teach them to
use a surgical mask and practice cough etiquette.
During seasons of high transmission of respiratory diseases, screen patients for symptoms of
respiratory infections and provide a separate space in the waiting area distant from other patients (at
Use of PPE
Wear a particulate respirator, such as a fit-tested N95 mask, and conduct a seal check
before entering the patient’s room (or use at least a surgical mask if particulate
respirator is not available). A seal check should be performed every time the N95 is used.
In the case of chickenpox or measles, no mask is needed for immune persons, but
susceptible persons should not be allowed to enter the room.
Remove the respirator or surgical mask after leaving the room and place it in a plastic
bag or waste container with a tight-fitting lid.
Gown, gloves, and eye protection are not needed for many organisms transmitted
exclusively by the airborne route (such as M. Tuberculosis, measles) but may be needed
when an infectious microorganism is transmitted by multiple routes (e.g., varicella virus).
Patient Transport
Limit the transport of patients to essential reasons only, for example, diagnostic tests or therapeutic
procedures that cannot be performed in the room. If the patient needs to leave the room for a test or
procedure:
Alert the department or facility where the patient is being transported so that they can
prepare to receive a patient on transmission-based precautions.
Use PPE appropriately.
Ensure that a patient on droplet or airborne precautions wears a surgical mask when
outside the patient’s room.
Cover wounds with appropriate dressings.
Clean and disinfect the wheelchair or coach after transportation.
Remove PPE and perform hand hygiene once the patient has been transported.
Droplet Precautions
These precautions reduce the risks of transmission of pathogens spread wholly or partly by droplets
larger than five μm in size (e.g., Bordatella pertussis, H. influenza & N. Meningitides,
M. pneumonia, flu, mumps, and rubella viruses). Other conditions include diphtheria, pertussis,
pneumonic plague, and S. pharyngitis.
These pathogens remain in the air briefly and can travel about one meter (three feet) or less. Droplet
transmission requires close proximity or contact between the source and the susceptible host. Droplets
may also land on surfaces and then be transferred by contact transmission.
Patient Placement
Private room, door can be left open. Patients should wear a surgical mask in waiting rooms
and when outside the patient’s room.
If a private room is not available, place the patient in a room with a patient having
active infection with the same disease, not with another infection.
If neither option is available, maintain over one meter (three feet) of spatial separation
between patient beds. Use of a physical barrier, such as a curtain or divider, is especially
important to prevent transmission by droplets.
Limit the transport of patients to essential purposes only and notify in advance the area of
the receiving patients.
Use of PPE
Wear eye protection and a face mask or face shield, which covers the eyes, nose, and
mouth completely, before entry into the patient care area.
Remove PPE after leaving the patient care area. If PPE is to be reused, it must be cleaned
and disinfected before each reuse.
Always perform hand hygiene before and immediately after patient care.
Cleaning
Ensure that rooms of patients on droplet precautions are frequently cleaned and disinfected
(at least daily and before use by another patient). Focus cleaning on surfaces, frequently
touched items, and equipment in the immediate patient area.
Use gloves, gown, and face/eye protection when cleaning patient care equipment and the
environment of a patient who has been on contact precautions.
Contact Precautions
Patients are placed on contact precautions when they have suspected or known infections that are
spread directly or indirectly from an infected or colonized individual by touch or contact with the
patient or the patient’s environment (surfaces and equipment). Contact is a common way that germs
spread in healthcare facilities. Organisms that require contact precautions include cholera; varicella-
zoster virus (shingles); neonatal or mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus; enterovirus meningitis;
patients infected or colonized with enteric pathogens; hemorrhagic fever viruses; multidrug-resistant
organisms, such as CRE; and C. difficile. Chicken pox is spread by both airborne and contact routes
at different stages of illness. Contact precautions should be implemented for patients with wet or
draining infection that may be contagious (e.g., draining abscesses, herpes zoster, impetigo,
conjunctivitis, scabies, lice, and wound infection).
Patient Placement
Isolate patients who require contact precautions in a single room, if possible. The door can be left open
in this case. If a private room is not available, place the patient in a room with a patient having active
infection with the same microorganism, not with another infection (cohorting). In multi-patient rooms,
more than one meter (three feet) spatial separation between patient beds is advised to reduce the
opportunities for inadvertent sharing of items between the infected/colonized patient and other patients.
Use of PPE
Put on a clean, non-sterile gown and gloves on entering the patient care area; remove and
properly discard before exiting the patient room.
Perform hand hygiene immediately after removing PPE.
For semi-private or multi-patient rooms, do not use the same PPE between patients.
Remove PPE, perform hand hygiene, and put on new PPE before coming in contact with
another patient or patient environment (e.g., bed, patient locker, over-bed table, IV stand).
Handwashing
Involves HCWs cleaning their hands before, after, and at specific moments during patient
care and when performing healthcare tasks.
Wash hands with antimicrobial agent or use alcohol hand rub before entering a room
and after removing gloves (if patient has C. difficile diarrhea, need to wash hands with
soap and water after removing gloves).
Do not touch potentially contaminated surfaces or items before leaving the room.
Patient Transport
Limit the transport of patients to essential purposes only.
During transport, ensure that precautions are maintained to minimize the risk of
transmission of organisms (i.e., cover patient with a clean linen, not the linen that was
used on the patient’s bed).
Cleaning
Ensure that the rooms of patients on contact precautions are frequently cleaned and
disinfected (at least daily and before use by another patient).
Focus cleaning on toilets, frequently touched surfaces, and equipment in the immediate
patient area.
Use gloves and a gown when cleaning patient care equipment and the environment of a
patient who has been on contact precautions.
Organisms that form spores (such as norovirus and C. difficile) require cleaning products,
such as bleach, that inactivate spores, which are more difficult to destroy than vegetative
microorganisms.
A complete listing of clinical syndromes or conditions warranting the empirical use of transmission-
based precautions is presented in table 3.1.
Table 3.1. Empiric use of transmission-based precautions (based on signs and symptoms) for isolation of a
patient in the hospital
Contact Droplet Airborne
Acute diarrhea in an incontinent or Symptoms of upper Chronic cough/fever/weight
diapered patient respiratory infection; cough, loss/night sweats and upper
runny nose, sore throat, lobe chest findings
Diarrhea in an adult with a history of congestion
recent antibiotic use or hospitalization Cough or fever and chest
(in settings with C. difficile) Severe during periods when findings in a person who is
pertussis is present in the infected with HIV or at high risk
Upper respiratory infections in infants community for HIV
and young children (wear a mask, as
per standard precautions) Suspected meningitis: fever, Rashes (vesicles or pustules)
vomiting, and stiff neck, suggestive of varicella
History of infection/colonization with persistent cough.
multidrug-resistant organisms (use Acute respiratory distress
airborne precautions for TB) Hemorrhagic rash with fever syndrome when new respiratory
organisms are a risk in the
Abscess or infected draining wound Generalized rash of unknown community
that cannot be covered with bandages cause
Vesicular rash (suspected
Skin or wound infection with varicella) (wear gown, gloves,
excessive drainage in a patient with a and eye protection also)
recent hospitalization (in settings
where multidrug-resistant
microorganisms are prevalent)
SUMMARY
To protect HCWs, patients, and visitors from acquiring infections during healthcare facility visits,
ensure compliance with standard precautions for all patients at all times, and apply transmission-based
precautions to all patients with potential or confirmed infections that are transmitted via contact,
droplet, and airborne routes.
Standard precautions, including hand hygiene, are the cornerstone of IPC. They provide the first line
of defense in the prevention of transmission of pathogens in healthcare facilities. Transmission-based
precautions, including their empiric use, are designed to provide additional protection, and reduce the
risk of transmission via airborne, droplet, and contact routes among hospitalized patients and HCWs.
These guidelines serve as the minimum requirements that should be enforced in all healthcare settings
to protect patients, visitors, and HCWs.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 3: STANDARD AND TRANSMISSION-BASED PRECAUTIONS
Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 1985. Recommendations for preventing transmission of infection with
human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus in the workplace. MMWR, 34(45): 681‒ 686;
691‒695. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00033093.htm.
Garner, JS. 1996. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17(1): 53‒80.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8789689/.
LeClaire, JM, Freeman, J, Sullivan, BF, et al. 1987. Prevention of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus
infection through compliance with glove and gown isolation precautions. New England Journal of Medicine,
317(6):329‒334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3600729/.
Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, et al. 2007. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: Preventing
transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/niosh-
219/0219-010107-siegel.pdf.
Tietjen, L, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities with
limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego Corporation. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
Key Topics
When to perform hand hygiene (WHO’s “5 Moments for Hand Hygiene”)
Proper technique for washing hands with soap and water
Proper technique for use of ABHR
Issues and considerations related to hand hygiene
Monitoring hand hygiene
WHO’s strategy for improving hand hygiene programs
BACKGROUND
Hand hygiene is the single most important measure to prevent the transmission of infection and is the
cornerstone of IPC. The original study in this field was conducted at a maternity hospital in Vienna,
Austria in 1847. This study demonstrated that the mortality rate among mothers was significantly
lower when the HCWs cleaned their hands with an antiseptic agent (Semmelweiss 1861). Numerous
other studies since then have demonstrated that HCWs’ hands become contaminated during routine
care of patients and can transmit infectious diseases from patient to patient (Association of
periOperative Registered Nurses [AORN] Recommended Practices Committee 2004; Duckro, Blom,
Lyle, et al. 2005; Ojajarvi 1980; Pittet, Dharan, Touveneau, et al. 1999; Riggs, Sethi, Zabarsky, et al.
2007; Sanderson and Weissler 1992). Proper hand hygiene can prevent the transmission of
microorganisms and decrease the frequency of HAIs. Despite evidence that hand hygiene prevents the
transmission of infections, compliance with hand hygiene recommendations during patient care
continues to present ongoing challenges in all settings. Methods used to improve compliance with
hand hygiene are addressed later in this chapter.
The goal of hand hygiene is to remove soil, dirt, and debris, and reduce both transient and resident
flora. Hand hygiene can be performed using ABHR or by washing the hands with water and plain or
antimicrobial soap (bar or liquid) that contains an antiseptic agent, such as chlorhexidine, iodophors,
or triclosan (WHO 2009a).
Traditionally, handwashing with soap and water has been the primary method of hand hygiene;
however, ABHR has been shown to be more effective for standard hand hygiene than plain or
antimicrobial soaps (CDC 2002). However, ABHR effectiveness is best achieved when hands are not
visibly soiled. Recommendations for when and how to perform hand hygiene are described in this
chapter.
“Failure to perform appropriate hand hygiene is considered to be the leading cause of healthcare associated
infections (HAIs) and the spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms, and has been recognized as a
significant contributor to outbreaks.”
Boyce, Pittet, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee 2002
Whenever the hands become visibly soiled after nasal blowing or following a covered
sneeze
Before touching the face (eyes, nose, or mouth)
Before and after cleaning the environment
Before and after preparing food
Before eating and drinking or serving food
After visiting the toilet
Figure 4.1. The steps for routine handwashing (How to properly wash your hands)
Handwashing with soap and water is recommended (rather than using ABHR) in the following
situations:
If the hands are visibly soiled or contaminated with blood or body fluids
After using the toilet
Before eating
To remove the buildup of emollients (e.g., glycerol) on the hands after repeated use of
ABHR
In outbreaks of C. difficile, but not in healthcare settings with only a few cases of C.
difficile (Cohen, Gerding, Johnson, et al. 2010; Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson, et al. 2007). C.
difficile is a bacterial infection that causes severe diarrhea and is common in some settings.
Figure 4.2. WHO recommendation on how to perform hand hygiene with ABHR
Top up the flask to 1,000 mL with distilled water or water that has been boiled and cooled; shake the flask
gently to mix the contents.
Formulation 2: To produce final concentrations of isopropyl alcohol 75% v/v, glycerol 1.45 v/v, hydrogen
peroxide 0.125% v/v:
Pour into a 1,000-mL graduated flask:
1. Isopropyl alcohol (with a purity of 99.8%), 751.5 mL
2. H2O2 3%, 41.7 mL
3. Glycerol 98%, 14.5 mL
Top up the flask to 1,000 mL with distilled water or water that has been boiled and cooled; shake the flask
gently to mix the contents.
v/v=volume percent, meaning 80 parts absolute alcohol in volume and 20 parts water measured as volume,
not as weight
Source: WHO 2009a
Do not add ABHR to a partially empty dispenser. This practice of “topping off” dispensers may lead
to bacterial contamination. The use of refill packets avoids this problem, but if they are not available,
the dispensers should first be thoroughly cleaned and dried before refilling (WHO 2009a).
Antiseptic Soaps
Antiseptic soaps can be used in place of plain soap during the “My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene”
described above, but are not recommended for most settings. Handwashing with antiseptic soap is
more irritating to the skin and more expensive than using ABHR. Therefore, if available, ABHR
should be used under normal circumstances (WHO 2009a).
Use of antiseptic soaps is recommended for surgical hand scrub and before entry into special areas of
healthcare facilities (e.g., neonatal ICUs).
Glove Use
Although the effectiveness of gloves in preventing contamination of HCWs’ hands has been
confirmed, gloves do not provide complete protection against hand contamination. Contamination
may occur as a result of small, undetected holes in gloves and during glove removal. Therefore,
wearing gloves does not replace the need for proper hand hygiene. Hand hygiene should always be
performed before putting on and after removing gloves. (See Volume 1, Chapter 5: Personal Protective
Equipment, for details on correct glove use) (CDC 2002; WHO 2002).
Wearing the same pair of gloves and cleaning gloved hands between patients or between dirty and
clean body sites is not a safe hand hygiene practice (Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson, et al. 2007; WHO
2009a; WHO 2009c; WHO 2009d). Not changing gloves between patients has been associated with
the transmission of microorganisms, such as MRSA and gram-negative bacilli. Reprocessing gloves
is not recommended.
Every effort must be made to reinforce the message that gloves do not replace the use of hand hygiene
and that when gloves are required, they should be used in addition to hand hygiene. (See Volume 1,
Chapter 5: Personal Protective Equipment, for more information on glove use.)
Fingernails
Research has shown that the area beneath the fingernails harbors the highest concentrations of bacteria
on the hands. This area most frequently harbors coagulase-negative staphylococci (a bacterium
normally found on the skin), gram-negative rods (bacteria known to cause infection), Corynebacteria
(bacteria), and yeasts. Fingernails longer than 0.2 cm (0.08 inches) have been shown to increase
carriage rates of S. aureus. Moreover, long nails, either natural or artificial, tend to puncture gloves
more easily than short nails. Therefore, nails should be kept moderately short —not extend more than
0.5 cm (0.2 inches) beyond the fingertip. (CDC 2002; Fagernes and Lingaas 2011; McGinley, Larson,
Leydon 1988; Olsen, Lynch, Coyle, et al. 1993; WHO 2009a).
Artificial Nails
Individuals with artificial nails have been shown to harbor more pathogenic organisms (i.e., disease-
causing microorganisms), especially gram-negative bacilli and yeast, on the nails and in the area
beneath the fingernails. Studies have demonstrated that the longer the artificial nail is, the more likely
that a pathogen can be isolated. Therefore, artificial nails (e.g., nail wraps, nail tips, acrylic
lengtheners) should not be worn in clinical areas because they constitute an infection risk in high-risk
areas (Hedderwick, McNeil, Lyons, et al. 2000; Jumaa 2005; Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson, et al. 2007).
Nail polish
There is concern that individuals wearing nail polish may be hesitant to perform rigorous hand hygiene
in an effort to protect their nails, although no studies have demonstrated a relationship between freshly
applied nail polish and infection. However, compromises in hand hygiene technique may lead to
transmission of infection. Chipped nail polish supports the growth of a larger number of organisms
on fingernails compared with freshly polished or natural nails. Also, dark-colored nail polish may
prevent dirt and debris under fingernails from being seen and removed (Baumgardner, Sallese
Marago, Walz, et al. 1993; CDC 2002; Rothrock 2006). The recommendation is that health workers
avoid using dark-colored nail polish when providing patient care.
Jewelry
Current evidence demonstrates that wearing rings increases hand contamination. Research has also
shown that HCWs wearing wristwatches had a higher total bacterial count on their hands compared
with HCWs without wristwatches. Surgical team members should not wear rings because it may be
more difficult for them to put on surgical gloves without tearing them (Fagernes and Lingaas 2011;
Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson, et al. 2007; Trick, Vernon, Hayes, et al. 2003). Rings with ridges or stones
should be avoided because of the greater difficulty in cleaning effectively, and the increased likelihood
of damage to gloves and injury to patients. If plain wedding rings are worn, they should be moved up
and down during hand hygiene for more effective cleaning.
In summary, HCWs should adhere to the following to ensure effective hand hygiene practices:
Keep nails short, clean, and without polish or artificial nail extensions.
Do not wear wrist watches and jewelry, including wearing rings with ridges or stones.
Cover any cuts or abrasions with waterproof dressings.
Keep sleeves short or rolled up.
Hand Care
Hand care is important to protect the skin from drying and cracking. Cracked skin may encourage
microbial colonization and broken areas can present a site of entry for pathogens. Hand creams can
be applied to care for the skin on hands.
Communal tubs of hand cream must be avoided because they may contain bacteria over time, and lead
to contamination of the hands.
Note: The following are recommendations for hand care to prevent irritation due to frequent hand hygiene
(based on WHO hand care recommendations [WHO 2009a]).
Develop a regular routine of using a protective hand cream or lotion, at least daily.
Do not routinely wash hands with soap and water immediately before or after using an
ABHR.
After hand rubbing or handwashing, let your hands dry completely before putting on gloves.
Validity: Doing a procedure technically correctly following the “gold standard” for that procedure. Reliability:
Completing a procedure technically correctly at all times following the “gold standard” for that procedure.
In the implementation of a hand hygiene monitoring program, expectations for performing hand
hygiene should be clearly defined and made known in the healthcare facility. Policies detailing these
expectations should also be in place. Monitoring should occur on a regular, routine basis, and a set
minimum number of observations should be collected in a given monitoring period.
Table 4.3. Advantages and disadvantages of various hand hygiene monitoring approaches
Monitoring approach Advantages Disadvantages
Direct observations by Only way to reliably capture Time-consuming
expert observers all hand hygiene opportunities
Skilled and validated observers required
Details can be observed
Prone to observation, observer, and selection
Unforeseen qualitative issues bias
can be detected while
observing hand hygiene
Not reliable
Consumption of Inexpensive Does not reliably measure the need for hand
hygiene products hygiene (denominator)
(e.g., towels, soap, Reflects overall hand hygiene
and ABHR) activity (selection biased) No information about the appropriate timing of
hand hygiene actions
Validity may be improved by
using indirect denominators Prolonged stocking of products at ward level
(e.g., patient-days or complicates and might jeopardize the validity
workload that is converted
into total hand hygiene Validity threatened by increased patient and
opportunities) visitor usage
Direct Monitoring
The goal of the direct hand hygiene observation is to observe HCWs during their usual patient care
activities. The observers should assess the HCWs’ compliance with indications for hand hygiene and
with facility policies on hand hygiene practices. It is preferable that observers have training and
experience as patient care professionals but this is not essential.
Hand hygiene observations should focus on the two essential parameters for determining hand hygiene
compliance:
When the HCW is observed, the action is considered to have been either “performed” or “not
performed” (WHO 2009).
WHO recommends that the “5 Moments” be used as a framework for observing opportunities for hand
hygiene. It is possible, however, to simplify which moments are observed, based on the objectives of
the period of observation and/or the resources available. Observation can be limited to certain
professional role categories or disciplines or certain indications in the “5 Moments” (e.g., in some
settings it may be appropriate to observe the action of hand hygiene only before and after contact with
the patient or the patient environment) (WHO 2009; WHO 2009a).
Observations should be collected in a standard way, such as on a form (Appendix 4A) with each hand
hygiene observation session on a separate form. A standard form should have three main sections:
A header containing information about the healthcare facility and the location in the
facility where the session was completed.
A second header containing information on the session observed.
Columns below the headers representing the sequence of actions for different HCWs
observed during the same session, with each column representing one HCW. (See
Appendix 4A for the WHO Observation Form.) (WHO 2009a; WHO 2009e)
Content can be adapted to suit the needs of the facility. Appendix 4B is a sample observation form for
hand hygiene data collection. This form reflects a modified approach that looks at hand hygiene
compliance at room entry and room exit only (useful for areas with single-patient rooms).
Hand hygiene compliance (%) is the simplest way to analyze the hand hygiene data collected. Hand
hygiene compliance is the ratio of the number of actions to the number of opportunities:
Compliance data can be summarized based on total compliance by a HCW, by role or discipline (e.g.,
doctors, nurses), or by location (e.g., ward A, ward B), depending on the objectives of the monitoring
program. It is important to provide feedback and disseminate compliance data to the HCWs and
leaders after the observation session/assessments are completed. Minimizing the delay between
observation and reporting of results may help increase the effects of the monitoring (WHO 2009a).
There are some limitations with direct monitoring of hand hygiene. For example, HCWs may improve
or modify their behavior in response to being observed or studied, resulting in an overestimate of
compliance. Therefore, it is important to be aware of this effect when evaluating compliance rates.
Indirect Monitoring
Indirect hand hygiene monitoring, such as monitoring the consumption of hand hygiene products (e.g.,
soap, ABHR, paper towels) to estimate the number of hand hygiene actions is a less expensive
monitoring approach and can be useful in settings where resources for direct monitoring are limited.
However, this methodology requires validation to be most effective. One of the major limitations of
this type of indirect monitoring is that it is impossible to determine if the hand hygiene actions were
performed at the proper moment (WHO 2009a).
Although complex, the hand hygiene improvement strategy lays the groundwork for the
implementation of a sustainable hand hygiene monitoring program. It is aimed at improving hand
hygiene compliance and increasing PS in the healthcare facility. The basic elements of each step
follow (WHO 2009a; WHO 2009e).
Step 1: Facility Preparedness
Assess and ensure the preparedness of the healthcare facility. Consider the following:
Identify a person or team to coordinate the program.
Identify HCWs and facility leadership who will play a major role in program
implementation.
Obtain raw materials to produce ABHR at the healthcare facility’s pharmacy (if
necessary).
Train observers on how to monitor hand hygiene practices.
Train identified persons on how to calculate hand hygiene compliance.
Step 2: Baseline Evaluation
Include a baseline evaluation of hand hygiene practices, facility infrastructure, HCW knowledge, and
current beliefs about hand hygiene. Consider the following:
Survey HCWs on their perceptions of hand hygiene (e.g., do they think that hand hygiene
is important, and/or effective, and/or necessary?).
Survey HCWs on their knowledge of hand hygiene (e.g., do they know how and when to
perform proper hand hygiene?).
Look for details in the healthcare facility’s structure that may help explain current hand
hygiene compliance (e.g., is there easy access to running water, sinks, and/or ABHR?).
Monitor the use of soap and ABHR, if applicable.
Collect baseline data on hand hygiene compliance.
Make sure that ABHR and dispensers are available in time for the start of Step 3.
Compile data on hand hygiene practices.
Step 3: Implementation
1b. System change: Access There is one sink for at least every 10 beds; soap; running water; and
to safe, continuous water clean, dry towels available at every sink.
supply and towels
2. Training and education A program to update training over the short, medium, and long term is
established.
3. Observation and feedback Two periods of observational monitoring are undertaken: the baseline
evaluation and the follow-up evaluation.
4. Reminders in the “How to” and “5 Moments” posters are displayed in all wards (e.g.,
workplace patient rooms, health facility staff areas, outpatient areas, ambulatory
departments).
5. Institutional safety climate The Chief Executive, Chief Medical Officer/Medical Superintendent,
and Chief Nurse all make a visible commitment to support hand
hygiene improvement during program implementation (e.g., verbal
announcements and/or formal letters to health facility staff).
Key Message
The hands of HCWs are a major source of transmission of nosocomial pathogens.
SUMMARY
Hand hygiene is the single most important measure to prevent the transmission of infection and is the
cornerstone of IPC. The goal of hand hygiene in healthcare is to prevent the transmission of infections
by removing bacteria from the hands at strategic “moments” during the care of patients. Hand hygiene
can be performed using ABHR or by washing the hands with water and soap. ABHR has been shown
to be more effective for standard hand hygiene than plain or antimicrobial soaps, and is more easily
available at the point of care. Despite evidence proving that hand hygiene prevents the transmission
of infections, compliance with hand hygiene recommendations during patient care continues to be
challenging in all settings and requires constant and ongoing efforts from IPC staff. WHO’s
Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy provides a guide for the implementation of a
sustainable hand hygiene program at healthcare facilities.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 4: HAND HYGIENE
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). 2014. APIC text of infection control
and epidemiology, 4th ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
Baumgardner, CA, Maragos, CS, Walz, JM, et al. 1993. Effects of nail polish on microbial growth of
fingernails. Dispelling sacred cows. AORN Journal, 58(1):84–88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8338363/.
Bhalla, A, Pultz ,NJ, Gries, DM, et al. 2004. Acquisition of nosocomial pathogens on hands after contact with
environmental surfaces near hospitalized patients. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 25(2):164–
167. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14994944/.
Boyce, JM, Pittet, D, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, et al. 2002. Guideline for
hand hygiene in health-care settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory
Committee and the HICPAC/SHSA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infection Control and Hospital
Epidemiology, 51(RR-16):1-CE4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12418624/.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 1985. Recommendations for preventing transmission of infection with
human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus in the workplace. MMWR, 34(45): 681‒ 686;
691‒695. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00033093.htm.
Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC). 2002. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings:
Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the
HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR. 51(RR-16).
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5116.pdf.
CDC. 2020. CDC/NHSN [National Healthcare Safety Network] Surveillance definitions for specific types of
infections. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/17pscNosInfDef_current.pdf.
Cohen, SH, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al. 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection
in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious
Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 31(5):431–455.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20307191/.
Duckro, AN, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, et al. 2005. Transfer of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci via health care
worker hands. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(3):302–307. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15710793/.
Fagernes, M, Lingaas, E. 2011. Factors interfering with the microflora on hands: A regression analysis of
samples from 465 healthcare workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(2):297–307.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20946569/.
Garner, JS. 1996. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17(1): 53‒80.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8789689/.
Girou, E, Loyeau, S, Legrand, P, et al. 2002. Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus
standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: Randomized clinical trial. British Medical Journal,
325(7360):362–365. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12183307/.
Hedderwick, SA, McNeil, SA, Lyons, MJ, et al. 2000. Pathogenic organisms associated with artificial
fingernails worn by healthcare workers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 21(8):505–509.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10968715/.
Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. n.d. Hand hygiene
compliance data collection form. http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/heic/docs/HH_observation_form.pdf.
The Joint Commission. 2009. Measuring hand hygiene adherence: Overcoming the challenges. Oakbrook
Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-
unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/topics-
library/hh_monographpdf.pdf?db=web&hash=7F1A70731D44DC2D183B1038CE34EC46.
Jumaa, PA. 2005. Hand hygiene: simple and complex. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 9(1):3–14.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15603990/.
Larson, E. 1988. A causal link between handwashing and risk of infection? Examination of the evidence.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 9(1):28–36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3276640/.
Larson, E. 1999. Skin hygiene and infection prevention: More of the same or different approaches? Clinical
Infectious Diseases, 29(5):1287–1294. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/29/5/1287/343839.
LeClaire, JM, Freeman, J, Sullivan, BF, et al. 1987. Prevention of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus
infection through compliance with glove and gown isolation precautions. New England Journal of Medicine,
317(6):329‒334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3600729/.
McCormick, RD, Buchman, TL, Maki, DG. 2000. Double-blind, randomized trial of scheduled use of a novel
barrier cream and an oil-containing lotion for protecting the hands of health care workers. American Journal of
Infection Control, 28(4):302–310. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10926708/.
McGinley, KJ, Larson, EL, Leydon, JJ. 1988. Composition and density of microflora in the subungual space of
the hand. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 26(5):950–953.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC266493/.
Ojajarvi, J. 1980. Effectiveness of handwashing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after
patient nursing. The Journal of Hygiene (Lond), 85(2):193–203. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6778914/.
Olsen, RJ, Lynch, P, Coyle, MB, et al. 1993. Examination gloves as barriers to hand contamination in clinical
practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270(3):350–353.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8315779/.
Pittet, D, Dharan, S, Touveneau, S, et al. 1999. Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during
routine patient care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159(8):821–826.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10219927/.
Riggs, MM, Sethi, AK, Zabarsky, TF, et al. 2007. Asymptomatic carriers are a potential source for
transmission of epidemic and nonepidemic Clostridium difficile strains among long-term care facility
residents. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 45(8):992–998. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17879913/.
Rothrock, J. 2006, November 27. What are the current guidelines about wearing artificial nails and nail polish
in the healthcare setting? http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/547793.
Rutala, WA. 1996. APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. 1994, 1995, and 1996 APIC
Guidelines Committee. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. American
Journal of Infection Control, 24(4):313–342. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8870916/.
Sanderson, PJ, Weissler, S. 1992. Recovery of coliforms from the hands of nurses and patients: Activities
leading to contamination. The Journal of Hospital Infections, 21(2):85–93.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1353096/.
Semmelweis, IP. 1861. Die aetiologie. Der begriff und die prophylaxis des kindbettfiebers. Pest, Hungary: C.
H. Hartleben’s Verlags-Expedition.
Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, et al. 2007, updated 2019. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions:
Preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings.
http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/2007ip/2007isolationprecautions.html.
Trick, WE, Vernon, MO, Hayes, RA, et al. 2003. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and
comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 36(11):1383–1390.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12766832/.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: A practical guide, 2nd
ed. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/drugresist/WHO_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002_12/en/.
WHO. 2009. Hand hygiene technical reference manual. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598606_eng.pdf.
WHO. 2009a. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: First global patient safety challenge. Clean
care is safer care. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf.
WHO. 2009b. Definition of terms. In: WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: First global patient
safety challenge. Clean care is safer care. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK144046/.
WHO. 2009f. A guide to the implementation of the WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy.
Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Guide_to_Implementation.pdf.
WHO. 2010a. Hand hygiene self-assessment framework 2010: Introduction and user instructions.
http://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/hhsa_framework_October_2010.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2010b. Water for health: WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality.
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/WHS_WWD2010_guidelines_2010_6_en.pdf? ua=1.
WHO. 2011. Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/80135/1/9789241501507_eng.pdf.
WHO. n.d. Training film: A tool to help convey the concept of the “5 moments for hand hygiene” to health-
care workers. http://www.who.int/gpsc/media/training_film/en/.
Key Topics
Types and uses of PPE
Instructions for putting on and removing PPE
Types of PPE to prevent transmission of infection during an outbreak
BACKGROUND
HCWs are confronted each day with the difficult question of how to work safely in the potentially
hazardous environment of healthcare facilities. Today, the most common occupational risk the
healthcare personnel face is due to contact with blood and body fluids during routine work, such as
cleaning, instrument processing, and patient care. This exposure to pathogens increases the risk of
getting HAIs and possible death. HCWs in some occupational settings, such as surgery and delivery
rooms, have a higher risk of exposure to pathogens than those in all other departments combined
(Gershon & Vlahov 1992; Gershon & Zirkin 1995). However, there is no area of clinical care practice
without risk of exposure to infectious substances. The use of risk-appropriate PPE is one of the
components of standard precautions, which refers to the wearing of protective barriers or clothing.
The use of PPE is ages old and has been reasonably helpful to protect patients or clients from
microorganisms that could be transmitted by medical staff and others working in the healthcare
setting. Lately, with the emergence of COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, HBV, HCV, and resurgence of TB in
many countries, including in Ethiopia, there is increased awareness of the importance of PPE for
protecting HCWs. Hospital administrators, supervisors, and HCWs need to be aware not only of the
benefits and limitations of specific PPE, but also of the actual role that PPE play in preventing
infection so that they can use them effectively and efficiently.
The basic principle behind wearing PPE is to get physical barrier/protection from pathogenic
microorganisms. PPE include gloves, masks/respirators, eyewear (face shields, goggles, or glasses),
caps, gowns, aprons, boots, and other items. The most effective barriers are made of treated fabrics or
synthetic materials that do not allow water or other liquids (blood or body fluids) to penetrate them.
However, these fluid-resistant materials are not widely available because they are expensive.
Lightweight cotton clothes (with a thread count of 140/inch) are materials most commonly used for
surgical clothing (masks, caps, and gowns) and drapes in many countries. Unfortunately, lightweight
cotton does not provide an effective barrier because moisture can pass through it easily, allowing
contamination.
On the other hand, denim, canvas, and heavy twill are too dense to allow steam penetration (i.e., they
cannot be sterilized), are hard to wash, and take too long to dry. When fabric is used, it should be
white or light-colored showing dirt and contamination more easily. To be effective, PPE must be
selected, worn, and removed correctly. The state of the PPE is also important for it to effectively
provide protection. For example, surgical gowns and drapes have proven to be effective for impending
wound infection only when dry. When wet, however, clothes act as a wick or sponge to draw bacteria
from the skin or equipment up through the fabric that can then contaminate a surgical wound.
Nose and mouth Coughing, talking Masks Situation that calls for
droplet transmission
Special masks When airborne
(N95) transmission is expected
Hands Touching Gloves with When there is a Patient
handwashing or reasonable chance of the
alcohol hand hands coming into contact
rubbing with blood and other body
fluids
Feet and lower Splashes, spills Closed boots or Situation where Service
legs and sharp material closed-toe shoes splashing or blood, body provider
(open sandals fluids, secretions, or
are not excretions is likely
acceptable)
Patient
Mucous Touching Gloves Situation where there is Service
membrane and direct contact with a provider and
non-intact skin mucous membrane and patient
non-intact skin
Blood and Splashing or Gloves, Invasive procedures where Service
body fluids spraying eyewear, mask, tissue beneath the skin is provider and
drapes, and exposed patient
Apron
Caps
Head covers are most commonly used as part of surgical attire in surgical and procedure areas. When
used, head covers or caps should be large enough to cover the entire scalp and hair (figure 5.1). Facial
hair is also required to be covered for surgical procedures in sterile areas (e.g., in the operating theater)
using a facial hair covering. They can be disposable or made of reusable cloth that can be laundered.
In the surgical and procedure areas, a new clean head covering should be worn each day and changed
sooner when soiled with blood or body fluids. The same standard and regularity of cleaning expected
for surgical scrubs should be applied when cleaning head/facial coverings (e.g., laundered at the
hospital and changed at least daily).
Caps are used to keep the hair and scalp covered so that flakes of the skin and hair are not shed on
the wound during surgery. Caps meant to be reliably protective should be large enough to cover all
the hair on the scalp. Head covers or caps are most often worn during surgery and in procedure areas
where a sterile field is required. They are not necessary for most other areas in the healthcare facility.
Head covers are not part of routine PPE for contact, droplet, or airborne precautions, but are used
during outbreaks for viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF). (See the section on use of PPE during outbreaks
of VHF at the end of this chapter.)
Eye protection should be comfortable, allow for sufficient peripheral vision (i.e., the area that is visible
outside the central area of focus), and must be adjustable to ensure a secure fit. Compared with older
styles of goggles, newer styles may provide better indirect airflow properties to reduce fogging,
provide better peripheral vision, and offer more size options for fitting goggles to different HCWs.
Eye wear protects staff during an accidental splash of blood or other body fluid by covering the eyes.
Masks and eyewear should be worn when performing any task where an accidental splash into the
face could occur (e.g., performing cesarean sections, vaginal delivery, or cleaning instruments) when
giving care to patients with droplet precautions. If face shields are not available, goggles or glasses
and a mask can be used together.
Eye and face protection must be worn when there is risk of splashing body fluids into mucous
membranes (e.g., eyes/nose). Eyes can be protected by wearing either goggles or a visor. If reusable
eye/face protection is used, it should be decontaminated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
guidelines. Hands should always be decontaminated after removing the equipment.
Note: Personal eyeglasses and contact lenses are NOT considered adequate eye protection (Siegel,
Rhinehart, Jackson, et al. 2007)
Put on eye protection after putting on the isolation gown and mask (if used) but before putting on
gloves (figure 5.3).
Figure 5.3. Putting on eye protection
Removal of face shields, goggles, and masks can be performed safely after gloves have been removed
(figure 5.4). The ties, earpieces, and/or headband used to secure the equipment to the head are
considered “clean” and safe to touch with bare hands. If the ties, earpieces, and/or headband are found
to be contaminated, they should be removed using gloved hands, and the skin/face should be rinsed
using ample running water and soap. The front of a mask, goggles, and face shield is considered
contaminated.
Masks
There are many different types of masks used to cover the mouth and nose. Masks made from cotton
or paper are comfortable but are not fluid-resistant (do not protect from splashes) and are not an
effective filter to prevent inhalation of microorganisms transmitted via droplet nuclei (≤ 5 µm). Masks
made from synthetic materials provide protection from large droplets (> 5 µm) spread by coughs or
sneezes. They may be more difficult to breathe through than cotton or paper masks. The use of masks
during patient care is part of standard precautions when there is a potential for splashes or droplet
transmission, and is part of droplet precautions (Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson, et al. 2007).
There are two types of masks (figure 5.5):
Surgical masks: Regulating bodies (such as United States Food and Drug Administration
[FDA], the European Union, and WHO) require surgical masks to have fluid-resistant
properties.
Procedure/isolation masks: These are not regulated, and they do not have any
specifications for their manufacture.
Surgical Masks
Masks should be large enough to cover the nose, the lower part of the face, the jaw, and all facial hair.
They are worn in an attempt to retain/confine moist droplets expelled as health workers or surgical
staff speak, cough, or sneeze. Equally important is their protective function against accidental splashes
of blood or other contaminated body fluids on the health workers’ nose or mouth. This preventive
function is only effective if the masks are made of fluid-resistant materials.
When removing, one should handle the masks by the strings; remove it with great care because the
center of the mask is the most contaminated part (Rothrock, Mcowen, Smith 2003).
Respirators
These are special types of masks called particulate respirators worn by healthcare personnel for
protection against inhalation exposure to airborne infectious agents that are < 5μm. They include
infectious droplet nuclei from patients with Micobacterium tuberculosis, Variola virus (smallpox),
SARS-CoV, and dust particles containing infectious particles, such as spores of environmental fungi
(e.g., Aspergillus sp.). Respirators should be worn when filtering inhaled air is deemed important.
These articles contain multiple layers of filter material and fit tightly onto the face allowing no air
leaks around the mask when breathing. The N95 disposable particulate and air purifying respirator
is the type used most commonly by healthcare personnel. Other respirators used include N-99 and N-
100 particulate respirators; powered air-purifying respirators with high-efficiency filters; and non-
powered full-face piece electrometric negative pressure respirators (Siegel, Rhinehart, Jackson, et al.
2007).
Figure 5.5. Types of masks
Gowns
Gowns should fully cover the torso of the HCW, fit comfortably over the body, and have long sleeves
that fit snuggly at the wrists.
There are three types of protective gowns used in healthcare facilities:
1. Isolation gowns
2. Surgical gowns
3. Coverall suits (See the section on use of PPE during outbreaks of VHF at the end of this
chapter.)
Isolation gowns should be long-sleeved, fluid-resistant, single-use, and preferably disposable.
Isolation gowns are designed to prevent contamination of the HCW’s arms, exposed areas of the body,
and clothing from blood, body fluids, and other potentially infectious material.
Note: Isolation gowns should be worn in combination with gloves and other PPE, as recommended.
Surgical gowns are sterile and preferably fluid-resistant, with sleeves that either taper gently toward
the wrists or end with elastic or ties around the wrists. Large, droopy sleeves are not recommended
because they can cause accidental contamination. Surgical gowns are used during surgery or
procedures to protect patients and the sterile field from microorganisms and from blood and other
body fluids (e.g., amniotic fluid) present on the HCW’s clothing, the front of the HCW’s body, and
the HCW’s arms.
When the surgical gowns are put on, the cuffs of sterile surgical gloves should completely cover the
end of the sleeves of the gowns.
Lightweight cloth or paper gowns are not recommended because they offer little protection against
moisture, which can easily pass through, allowing the passage of microorganisms. If a cloth or paper
gown is used, always wear a plastic apron under/over it.
If a protective covering fails (e.g., during a large spill) and skin/clothing becomes contaminated with
blood or body fluids, clothing should be removed and laundered immediately. The HCW should bathe
as soon as possible after completing the operation or procedure.
Coveralls are full-body suits made from materials that are lightweight, breathable, and impermeable
to liquids (figure 5.6). They should be worn by all HCWs who work in isolation areas for treating
highly infectious diseases (e.g., VHF). They are designed to go over a scrub suit and create a barrier
to eliminate or reduce contact exposure to blood, body fluids, and highly infectious microorganisms
(CDC 2016). Coveralls without an attached hood and with thumbholes are recommended.
Steps for putting on coverall suits
Assess the garment for any visible tears or compromise to integrity.
Make sure that a trained observer is watching and monitoring the steps.
Perform hand hygiene.
Put on the scrub suit, rubber boots, or shoe covers, and a pair of sterile or non-sterile gloves.
Unfold the coverall suit and unzip.
Slide legs, one by one, into the suit.
Slide arms, one by one, into the suit.
Tuck the cuffs of the first pair of gloves under the sleeves of the coverall suit.
Insert thumbs into thumb hole (if provided).
Close the zipper by pulling it up to the neck.
Cover the zipper with the additional flap, if available .
Make sure that a trained observer is watching and monitoring the removal process and is
ready to assist, if needed.
Disinfect inner gloves using ABHR or 0.5% chlorine solution covering all surfaces of the
gloved hands.
Lift the chin.
Find the zipper at the level of the belly and carefully trace fingers of one hand up to find
the zipper tab.
Hold the outside of the top of suit with the other hand (do not let it go).
Unzip or unfasten the suit completely (still holding the top near the zipper).
Gently pull the side of the suit being held partially over the shoulder.
Perform a rotating movement of the shoulder inside out (one by one) to remove the
coverall and carefully move the coverall down the body, turning inside out.
Do a “moon walk” to remove the legs of the suit over the boots.
Carefully place it in the waste bag, touching only the inside.
Avoid contact of the scrub suit with the outer surface of the gown.
Disinfect gloved hands using ABHR or 0.5% chlorine solution, covering all surfaces of the
gloved hands.
See the step-by-step PPE removal checklist for essential next steps in removal of PPE.
Plastic Apron
It is used to protect clothing or surfaces from contamination. Reusable aprons, which are made of
rubber or plastic, provide a waterproof barrier along the front of a person’s body. Therefore, it should
also be worn during cleaning and procedures with the likelihood of splashes or spillage of blood, body
fluids, secretions, or excretions (e.g., when conducting deliveries). Disposable water-proof aprons are
also available for clinical use.
Aprons keep contaminated fluids off the HCW’s clothing and skin. For example, during invasive
procedures, wearing a water resistant apron (disposable or reusable) will not only help guard the
healthcare provider against exposure to blood or body fluids (e.g., amniotic fluid), but also prevents
the HCW’s abdominal skin from being a source of contamination to the patient.
Gloves
HCWs wear gloves for three reasons:
1. To reduce the risk of staff acquiring infections from patients.
2. To reduce the risk of transmitting microorganisms, including skin flora from provider to
clients/patients.
3. To reduce contamination of staff’s hands by microorganisms that are transmissible from
one patient to another (cross-contamination).
Types of Gloves
Surgical glove should be used when performing invasive medical or surgical procedures.
Clean examination gloves provide protection to HCWs when performing many of their routine
duties. These gloves can be used when contact with mucous membranes and non-intact skin are
expected (e.g., during medical examinations and procedures, such as pelvic examination).
Utility or heavy-duty household gloves should be worn when processing instruments, equipment,
and other items; for handling and disposing of contaminated waste; and when cleaning contaminated
surfaces. Double gloving of either new examination gloves or reprocessed surgical gloves provide
some protection if utility gloves are not available.
Note:
A clear understanding of the parameters to opt for sterile or high-level disinfected gloves is important. Judicious
use of these options can reduce costs and at times maintain safety for both patients and staff.
The use of high-level disinfected surgical gloves when performing surgical or invasive procedures is the only
acceptable alternative on condition that sterile surgical gloves are not available.
Table 5.2 shows the advantages and disadvantages of different types of non-sterile gloves .
The best surgical gloves are made of latex rubber because of the rubber’s natural elasticity, sensitivity,
durability, and a comfortable fit. An increasing problem of allergies to latex these days created a
demand for another material. A new synthetic, rubber-like material called “nitrile,” which has
properties similar to latex, has been developed to make better gloves. This new glove material is less
likely to cause allergic reactions. In many countries, the only type of examination gloves available
is made of vinyl, a synthetic material that is less expensive than latex rubber. Although vinyl is
cheaper, it is inelastic (does not stretch like latex), making these gloves loose-fitting and easy to tear.
To conclude, the better quality examination gloves are made from latex or nitrile. They can be found
in medical supply stores in most countries. Utility gloves, which are made of thick rubber, are more
intractable and are meant for maximal protection during heavy duty activities.
Deciding which type of examination glove is best for a task (if a choice is available) largely depends
on the degree of risk from the exposure (low or high risk) to a potentially pathogen-laden blood or
body fluids; the length of the procedure to be carried out; and the possibility of the development of an
allergy to latex or, rarely, to nitrile.
Vinyl examination gloves should only be used for short tasks involving minimal stress on the glove
and low risk of exposure. If they are the only type of examination glove available and the risk
of exposure to blood and body fluids is high, frequent changing or double gloving should be
considered.
Natural rubber latex examination gloves provide the best protection. They are the most appropriate
for surgical procedures and tasks involving moderate to high risk, such as exposure to blood or body
fluids. These gloves should be avoided if staff have a known or suspected allergy to latex or for
prolonged contact (>1 hour) with HLDs, such as glutaraldehyde (because it may cause loss of
effectiveness due to the breakdown of latex).
Nitrile examination gloves are best for staff with a latex allergy and can be used for activities involving
moderate to high risk. Nitrile gloves have many of the characteristics of latex but have a better
resistance to oil-based products. Staff with a known allergy to nitrile or latex compounds should not
use these gloves.
Note: When using latex rubber gloves, avoid the use of hand creams or lotions that contain mineral oil,
petroleum jelly (Vaseline), or lanolin to protect your hands because they may cause the gloves to break down
within a few minutes.
The Glove Pyramid: an aid to decision making on when to wear (and not wear) gloves
Gloves must be worn according to STANDARD and CONTACT PRECAUTIONS. The pyramid
details some clinical examples in which gloves are not indicated, and others in which clean or sterile
gloves are indicated. Hand hygiene should be performed when appropriate regardless of the
indications for glove use (figure 5.8).
operating room nurses against blood-borne pathogen exposure. It should be introduced as a routine
practice (Guo et al. 2012).
When double gloving, the first glove should be a half size larger than normally worn gloves. The
second pair, however, should be the correct size because this will help prevent the hand from
cramping. Whether the surgeon, assistant, or nurse should double glove should be considered
carefully, especially in setups where gloves are reused and the risk of contracting bloodborne
pathogens, such as HIV, is high (>5% prevalence).
In general, for short duration surgical procedures (30 minutes or less) and those involving minimal
exposure to blood or mucous secretions (e.g., laparoscopy or minilaparotomy), double gloving is
probably not necessary.
Note: The practice of hand hygiene, coupled with the use of protective gloves, is a key component in
minimizing the spread of disease.
The purpose of donning and removing sterile gloves, as shown in figure 5.9, is to ensure maximum
asepsis for patients and to protect the HCW from the patient’s body fluids. In the correct use of
gloves—a means to achieve this double goal—the skin of the HCW remains exclusively in contact
with the inner surface of the glove and has no contact with the outer surface. Any error in the
performance of this technique leads to a lack of asepsis, requiring a change of gloves.
5. Slip the other hand into the glove in a single movement, keeping the folded cuff at the wrist
level.
6-7. Pick up the second glove by sliding the fingers of the gloved hand underneath the cuff of the
glove.
8-10. In a single movement, slip the second glove on the ungloved hand while avoiding any
contact/resting of the gloved hand on a surface other than the glove to be donned
(contact/resting constitutes a lack of asepsis and requires a change of gloves).
11. If necessary, after donning both gloves, adjust the fingers and inter-digital spaces until the gloves
fit comfortably.
12-13. Unfold the cuff of the first gloved hand by gently slipping the fingers of the other hand inside
the fold, making sure that any contact with the outer surface of the glove is avoided (lack of
asepsis requiring a change of gloves).
14. The hands are gloved and must touch exclusively sterile devices or the previously- disinfected
patient’s body area.
15-17. Remove the first glove by peeling it back with the fingers of the opposite hand. Remove the
glove by rolling it inside out to the second finger joint (do not remove completely).
18. Remove the other glove by turning its outer edge on the fingers of the partially ungloved
hand.
19. Remove the glove by turning it inside out entirely (ball forming) to ensure that the skin of the
HCW is always and exclusively in contact with the inner surface of the glove.
20. Discard the gloves.
21. Perform hand hygiene after glove removal according to the recommended indication.
Donning surgical sterile gloves at the time of a surgical intervention follows the same sequence
except that:
It is preceded by a surgical hand preparation.
Donning of the gloves is performed after putting on a sterile surgical gown.
The opening of the first packaging (non-sterile) is done by an assistant.
The second packaging (sterile) is placed on a sterile surface and is then used for the
intervention.
Gloves should cover the wrists of the sterile gown.
Note: A separate pair of gloves must be used for each client to avoid cross-contamination or when moving
from one site to another site on the same patient (i.e., from respiratory care to a dressing change). It is
preferable to use new and single use (disposable) gloves only.
When readymade elbow length gloves are not available, an effective alternative material (asdescribed
below) can be easily made from previously used surgical latex gloves that have been reprocessed
(decontaminated, cleaned, and dried using the two methods of either sterilization or HLD).
The acceptable “leak rate” for new surgical and examination gloves designated by regulatory
agencies is up to 4% (Davis 2001).
1. Cut one or more fingers completely off (depending on the size of your hands) each glove just
below where all the fingers join the gloves.
2. Sterilize or HLD two to three pair of cut-off (fingerless) gloves according to the
recommended process for each method, and store the gloves after final processing in a sterile
or high-level disinfected container until needed.
How to Use
Perform surgical hand scrub.
Put on the intact sterile or HLD surgical gloves to completely cover up the distal end of
the fingerless gloves (figure 5.12).
Put the fingerless sterile or HLD gloves and pull them up to the forearms.
There is still no therapy or desensitization for a latex allergy. Therefore, the only option is to avoid
contact with it (Patriarca G. 2002).
Footwear
Footwear are worn to protect the feet from injury by sharp or heavy items or fluids that may
accidentally spill over, drip, or even pour out on them. All footwear should have closed toes, low
heels, and nonskid soles. Clean, sturdy shoes are recommended for all clinical areas. Rubber boots
or leather shoes provide the best protection. They must be kept clean. For this reason, sandals and
other open-toe shoes or shoes made of soft materials are not acceptable. Rubber boots or leather shoes
are acceptable, but they must be kept clean and free of contamination from blood or other bodyfluid
spills. Shoe covers are unnecessary if clean and sturdy shoes are available for dedicated use only in
the surgical area and are not meant to prevent transmission of bacteria from the floor. However, shoe
covers may be needed to prevent contamination of shoes with blood and body fluids (AORN 2019;
Bearman, Bryant, Leekha, et al. 2014).
Sequence for Putting on PPE for Sterile Surgical Procedures in the Operating
Theater
1. Change from street clothes to a clean scrub suit (one that has been processed in the healthcare
facility laundry). Remove all jewelry.
2. Put on non-skid, low-heel shoes with closed toes and back, rubber boots, or shoe covers when
there is a risk of gross contamination with blood or body fluids.
3. Perform hand hygiene.
4. Put on a plastic apron if the sterile surgical gown is not fluid-resistant.
5. Put on a surgical head cover (and facial hair cover, if needed) to ensure that hair on the head
(and beard) are fully covered.
6. Put on a surgical mask, one that fits well and fully covers the mouth and the nose.
7. Put on appropriately sized, well-fitting goggles or a chin-length face shield.
8. Perform a surgical hand scrub using soap and water and ABHR (see Volume 1, Chapter 4:
Hand Hygiene).
9. Put on a sterile surgical gown without contamination (figure 5.7A).
10. Lastly, put on sterile surgical gloves without contamination (figure 5.7B).
Note: There may be instances where PPE to protect the HCW from infectious disease may be required, in
addition to surgical attire, such as a respirator for surgery on a patient with known or suspected TB, or
additional skin coverage for surgery on a patient with known or suspected VHF.
Sequence for Removing PPE Following Sterile Surgical Procedures in the Operating
Theater
1. Remove the gloves following the recommended steps and dispose of them in a waste
container; do not reprocess or reuse the gloves.
2. Remove the gown, avoid touching the outer side of the gown, and dispose of it in a waste
container (if a single-use gown) or place the used gown in a container for processing later.
3. Remove the plastic apron, if one was used, and dispose of it in a waste container (if a single-
use apron) or place the used apron in a container for processing later.
4. Remove eye protection.
5. Remove the surgical mask.
6. Perform hand hygiene.
7. These steps will be performed at the end of the day unless any item becomes soiled.
8. Remove the head cover (and facial cover).
9. Remove shoe covers (if worn).
10. Remove shoes.
11. Remove scrub suit.
12. Lastly, perform hand hygiene.
Adapted from: AORN 2019
SUMMARY
The use of PPE is recommended to protect HCWs from hazards encountered during their regular,
daily duties. An adequate supply of PPE should be available for use at the point of care. Management
staff should be aware of when and how to replenish PPE supplies. In situations with limited resources,
PPE should be prioritized to provide the implementation of standard precautions, at a minimum. Staff
should be educated and trained on the indications for PPE, the benefits and limitations of specific
PPE, and the correct procedure for putting on, wearing, and removing PPE so that PPE can be used
effectively and efficiently. Healthcare facility support and feedback from supervisors are also
necessary to create sustained compliance with PPE guidance.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 5: PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). 2019. Guideline for surgical attire. Denver, CO:
AORN, Inc. https://pdihc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/AORN-Guideline-for-Surgical-Attire.pdf
AORN. 2012. Recommended practices for sterile technique. In: Perioperative standards and recommended
practices, 2012 Ed. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc.
Bearman, G, Bryant, K, Leekha, S, et al. 2014. Healthcare personnel attire in non-operating-room settings.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(2):107–121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24442071/
Bhalla, A, Pultz, NJ, Gries, DM, et al. 2004. Acquisition of nosocomial pathogens on hands after contact with
environmental surfaces near hospitalized patients. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 25(2):164–
167. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14994944/.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020a. The National Personal Protective Technology
Laboratory (NPPTL). Respirator trusted-source information.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/respsource.html.
CDC. 2016. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Bloodborne infectious diseases:
HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/bbp/.
CDC. 2018. Guidance on Personal Protective Equipment to Be Used by Healthcare Workers During
Management of Patients with confirmed Ebola or Persons under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola who are
Clinically Unstable or Have Bleeding, Vomiting, or Diarrhea in U.S. Hospitals, Including Procedures for
Putting On (Donning) and Removing (Doffing). http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-
us/ppe/guidance.html.
CDC. 2014. Ebola: Personal protective equipment (PPE) donning and doffing procedures. Doffing PPE:
Remove outer apron. Video. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/hcp/ppe-
training/n95Respirator_Coveralls/doffing_04.html.
CDC. 2020. The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL): Considerations for selecting
protective clothing used in healthcare for protection against microorganisms in blood and body fluids.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/protectiveclothing/.
Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. 2014. Guidance for the selection and use of personal
protective equipment (PPE) in healthcare settings. Document modified in 10/20/21.
https://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/ppe/PPEslides6-29-04.pdf.
Davis, MS. 2001. Advanced precautions for today’s OR: The operating room professional's handbook for the
prevention of sharps injuries and bloodborne exposures, 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Sweinbinder Publications
LLC.
Duckro, AN, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, et al. 2005. Transfer of vancomycin-resistant enterococci via health care
worker hands. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(3):302–307. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15710793/.
Gammon, J, Morgan-Samuel, H, Gould, D. 2008. A review of the evidence for suboptimal compliance of
healthcare practitioners to standard/universal infection control precautions. Journal of Clinical Nursing,
17(2):157–167. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17331098/.
Garner, JS. 1996. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17(1): 53‒80.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8789689/.
Gershon, R. 1996. Facilitator report: Bloodborne pathogens exposure among healthcare workers. American
Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(4): 418–420. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0274(199604)29:4%3C418::AID-AJIM29%3E3.0.CO;2-3.
Gershon, R, Zirkin, B. 1995. Behavioral factors in safety training. In Laboratory safety, principles and
practices, 2nd ed. Flemming, DO, et al (eds). Washington DC: AMS Press.
Gershon, R, & Vlahov, D. 1992. Assessing and reducing HIV risk to the critical care nurse. In Critical care
nursing currents. Ross Laboratories.
Gralton, J, Rawlinson, WD, McLaws, ML. 2013. Health care workers’ perceptions predicts uptake of
personal protective equipment. American Journal of Infection Control, 41(1):2–7.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22633133/.
Guo, Y. P., Wong, P. M., Li, Y., & Or, P. P. (2012). Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison
between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during
surgery. American Journal of Surgery, 204(2), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017
International Labour Organization (ILO) and World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. Joint ILO/WHO
guidelines on health services and HIV/AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO and WHO.
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/prev_care/ilowhoguidelines.pdf?ua=1.
Jhpiego. 2018. Infection Prevention and Control, Module 3. Personal Protective Equipment, Reference
Manual for Health Care Facilities with Limited Resources. https://www.jhpiego.org/wp-
content/uploads/2020/03/IPC_M3_PPE.pdf.
ipscomb, J, Rosenstock, L. 1997. Health care workers: protecting those who protect our health. Infection
Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 18(6):397–399. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/infection-
control-and-hospital-epidemiology/article/healthcare-workers-protecting-those-who-protect-our-
health/E00E025D082591D932FC8D43BD3C8DEF.
Loeb, M, McGeer, A, Henry, B, et al. 2004. SARS among critical care nurses, Toronto. Emerging Infectious
Diseases, 10(2):251–255. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322898/.
Mischke, C, Verbeek, JH, Saarto, A, et al. 2014. Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for
preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database Systematic
Reviews, 3(CD009573). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24610769/.
Rothrock, J, Mcowen D, Smith, D (eds). 2003. Alexander’s care of the patient in surgery, 16th ed. St Louis,
MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc.
Secured Medical Direction UK Co, Ltd. 2017. Products: Surgical Gown. http://www.smd-
medical.com/catalogue/non-woven/8-Chemo-Gown-CATALOGUE.pdf .
Seto, WH, Tsang, D, Yung, RWH, et al. 2003. Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in
prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet,
361(9368):1519–1520. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12737864/.
Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, et al. 2007. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: Preventing
transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/isolation-guidelines-H.pdf.
Tietjen, LG, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities with
limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
Tietjen, LG, Cronin, W, McIntosh, N. 1992. Infection prevention guidelines for family planning service
programs: Handwashing and gloving. Durant, OK: Essential Medical Information Systems, Inc.
Tietjen, LG, Cronin, W., McIntosh, N. 1992. Traffic flow. In Infection prevention guidelines for family planning
programs. Durant, OK: Essential Medical Information Systems, Inc.
Tomas ME, Kundrapu S, Thota P, et al. 2015. Contamination of health care personnel during removal of
personal protective equipment. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine,
175(12):1904–1910. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26457544/.
US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OHSA). 2001. Revision to OSHA's
bloodborne pathogens standard. https://www.osha.gov/needlesticks/needlefact.html.
Valim, MD, Marziale, MHP, Richart-Martínez, M, et al. 2014. Instruments for evaluating compliance with
infection control practices and factors that affect it: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(11–
12):1502–1519. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24004371/.
Watt, AM, Patkin, M, Sinnott, MJ, et al. 2010. Scalpel safety in the operative setting: A systematic review.
Surgery, 147(1):98–106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19828169/.
World Health Organization (WHO), World Alliance for Patient Safety. 2006. Information sheet 6: The first
global patient safety challenge: Clean care is safer care. http://www.who.int/gpsc/tools/Infsheet6.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2004. Making pregnancy safer: The critical role of the skilled attendant. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.unscn.org/layout/modules/resources/files/Making_pregnancy_safer_the_critical_role.pdf.
WHO. 2008a. How to put on and take off personal protective equipment (PPE).
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70066.
WHO. 2008b. Infection control strategies for specific procedures in health-care facilities: Epidemic-prone
and pandemic-prone acute respiratory diseases: A quick reference guide.
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/WHO_CDS_HSE_2008_2/en/.
WHO. 2009a. WHO Guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: First global patient safety challenge.
Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf.
WHO. 2003. Aide-Memoire for a strategy to protect health workers from infection with bloodborne viruses.
http://www.who.int/occupational_health/activities/1am_hcw.pdf.
Key Topics
Magnitude of unsafe injection
The risks and impact associated with unsafe injection practices
Common reasons for prescribing and providing unnecessary and unsafe injections
Unsafe injection practices: Transmission pathways
The best practices in injection safety
Role of the prescriber in injection safety
Principles in safe injection practices
Injection devices and their safety features
Safe handling of medications containing vials (single and multiple dose vials)
Sharps safety
BACKGROUND
WHO estimates that in developing and transitional Member States, 16 billion healthcare injections
are administered each year (i.e., an average of 3.4 injections per person yearly). Concurrently, it is
estimated that at least 50% of all injections are unsafe (WHO 2015).
Injection safety baseline studies conducted by FMOH and Making Medical Injections Safer in 2004
and 2005 showed that about 74% of injections were unsafe, about 72% of health facilities practiced
unsafe disposal, and the prevalence rate of needle stick injury was 30% to 35%. It is also reported
that almost one-half (45%) of the community members have a tendency to prefer injections to other
preparations (Habtetsion et al. 2009).
Improper use of syringes, needles, and medication vials during routine healthcare procedures, such
as administering injections, have resulted in more than 40 outbreaks in both hospital and non-hospital
settings with transmission of bloodborne viruses, including HCV.
A safe injection, as has already been briefly defined, does not harm the recipient, expose the provider
to any avoidable risk, and result in any waste that is dangerous to the community. Unsafe injection
practices, on the contrary, are ones that could harm the recipient, and/or the provider and/or may
result in waste that is dangerous to the community.
known to believe that oral medications are less effective than injections for the treatment of fever
caused by minor illness (Habtetsion et al. 2009).
Risk to Patients
Unsafe injections can result in transmission of a wide variety of pathogens, including viruses,
bacteria, fungi, and parasites. WHO estimates that in low- and middle-income countries, 16 billion
healthcare injections are administered each year, translating to approximately three injections per
person per year, many of which are unnecessary. The reuse of syringes or needles, which is common
in many settings, exposes patients to pathogens either directly (via contaminated equipment) or
indirectly (via contaminated medication vials). The risks of unsafe injection practices have been well-
documented for the three primary bloodborne pathogens: HIV, HBV, and HCV. Worldwide, each
year, the overuse of injections and unsafe injection practices combine to cause an estimated:
Adverse effects are often caused by an unsafe injection. This is an incidence that harms a person
receiving healthcare caused by poor injection practices rather than the underlying disease that caused
the patient to seek treatment. Adverse events caused by an unsafe injection include:
Transmission of bloodborne infections occurs due to inoculation of infectious agents
in the patient’s body. There are about 40 bloodborne pathogens that could be
transmitted via injection. Among them, HBV, HCV, HIV/AIDS are the most common
and have the gravest implications.
Injection abscesses are inflammatory conditions, ranging from the initial signs of
inflammation to big swelling occurring from suppurative processes.
Paralysis following the damage of a nerve as a result of injection of a drug into a nerve
and trauma.
Drug/allergic reactions shock is a life threatening condition characterized by sudden
collapse of the circulatory system due to an immunological response to the injected drug,
or other local or systemic allergic reactions.
Risk to HCWs
Globally, in the course of their duties, HCWs are at an increased risk from bloodborne pathogens
because they handle sharps, including needles and syringes. It is estimated that 39% of HCV, 37%
of HBV, and 4.4% of HIV infection among HCWs worldwide are attributable to occupational
exposure to sharps injuries (Prüss-Üstün, Rapiti, Hutin 2005). Both patients and HCWs are at risk of
bloodborne disease from unsafe injection practices. Eliminating unnecessary injections and using
safe injection practices are the best ways to protect patients and staff from the risks.
Socioeconomic: Each year, the annual global burden of indirect medical costs due to
HBV, HCV, and HIV/AIDS is estimated to be US$ 535 million.
Psychosocial impact includes: Stigma, discrimination, and social isolation following
infections such as HIV; stress associated with HIV; burden on the family and the
community (unproductive, children will be orphans, etc.); and risk of transmitting
infections to the family and the community. The psychosocial impact can be seen at
individual, family, community, and country levels.
Make sure that the “right” things/ways are fulfilled when administering injections (table 6.3).
Prepare a well-laid up tray, including emergency drugs for management or possible drug
reaction.
Wash hands with soap and water. Alcohol could be used as a secondary step after soap
and water except for Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) injection.
Dry the hands. You can use small paper towels or any single use towels.
Check for the integrity of the vial/ampoule for the following: expiry date, breach,
leaks, particles, or any contamination.
Make sure that the right dose, formulation, and route are used for the right patient
or client.
For medications that need to be reconstituted (powder forms), it should be done
according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and use the correct diluents.
Draw the right dose as prescribed, including expelling the air using the right injection
equipment.
Ensure aseptic technique while giving the injection.
Administer the drug at the correct site.
Dispose of the used syringes and needles immediately in the sharp’s container. (Never give
used syringes and needles to patients or clients to carry home even if they came with the
equipment.)
A patient should be kept in the room for at least f ive minutes after the injection has
been given and be observed for any possible adverse effect or events.
1. Right patient What is the name on the prescription? Ask patient/guardian, etc. to repeat
Is this the right patient? name.
2. Right drug Is the name of the drug on the Verify name of drug on prescription
prescription the same as the with injection to be administered.
injection you are about to If you are unsure, verify with the
administer? physician or pharmacist.
1. Right Could the medication be given Discuss with patient the available
formulation orally instead of as an injection? choices.
2. Right injection Use only sterile, non-reusable Check to ensure that syringe/needle
equipment syringes, dental cartridge, etc. package is unbroken.
3. Right dosage Check dosage against patient’s age, Read the pharmaceutical
weight, and the pharmacokinetics of recommendations of the drug. If
the drug. unsure, verify with the
physician/prescriber.
4. Right time Follow the specific dose interval. Be mindful of the action of the drug
and why the time interval should be
followed.
Explain the importance of this to the
patient.
5. Right route Be sure to use the correct route of Observe the direction of the prescriber.
administration (intra-muscular, Check prescription or other
intravenous, intra-dermal, or related records.
subcutaneous).
6. Right storage Right temperature, vaccine vial Check cold chain issues, including
monitor shake test vaccine vial monitor.
7. Right method Do not recap needle. Check the safety box for correct
of disposal Dispose of used syringe and needle method of disposal.
immediately after use in appropriate
safety box.
or
Use the needle cutter and safety box.
Practices
Evidence-based safety practices can be divided into four major areas of intervention:
Single use syringe and needle for each injection is recommended. Auto-disable syringes are
mandatory for all immunization injections.
For curative and other purpose injections, syringes with reuse prevention devices and safety features
are recommended. Where these are not available, standard disposable syringes can be used. Studies
show that unsafe injection practices, such as using the same needle, syringe, or both for more than
one injection or improperly processed syringes and needles are responsible for the transmission of
HIV, HBV, and HCV (Drucker, Alcabes, Marix 2001). Therefore, after each use, the assembled
needle and syringe should be placed in a container for the disposal of sharps.
2. Prevent Contamination of Injection Equipment and Medications
Prepare each injection in a clean designated area where blood or body fluid contamination
is unlikely.
Use single dose vials rather than multi-dose vials.
If multi-dose vials must be used, always pierce the septum with a sterile needle and avoid
leaving the needle in place in the stopper of the vial.
Select pop-open ampoules rather than ampoules that require use of a metal file to open.
If you are using an ampoule that requires a metal file to open, protect your fingers with a
clean barrier (e.g., small gauze pad) when opening the ampoule.
Inspect the medications and discard those with visible contamination or breaches of
integrity (e.g., cracks, leaks).
Follow product-specific recommendations for use, storage, and handling.
Swabbing a new vial top or ampoule with an antiseptic or disinfect is unnecessary. If
swabbing with an antiseptic is selected for use, use a clean, single-use swab, and maintain
the product-specific recommended contact time. Do not use cotton balls stored wet in a
multiuse container.
Swabbing of clean skin before giving an injection is unnecessary. Wash visibly soiled or
dirty skin with soap and water. If swabbing with an antiseptic is selected for use, use a
clean, single-use swab, and maintain the product-specific recommended contact time. Do
not use cotton balls stored wet in a multiuse container.
Discard a needle that has touched any non-sterile surface.
Hypodermic needles (hollow bore needles) cause most of the injuries to HCWs at all levels of the
health system. Injuries may occur during procedures (clinicians), during cleaning and washing
(housekeepers), and handling of waste materials.
Precautions to take before an injection depend on the type of procedure being carried out.
Anticipate and take measures to prevent sudden patient movement during and after an
injection.
Do not recap, bend, or break needles before the disposal of single-use needles and
syringes after giving injections. However, if there is a need to recap a needle for various
reasons, the needle should be recapped using the “one-handed” recap method, as follows:
o First, place the needle cap on a firm and flat surface, and then remove the hand.
o Next, with one hand holding the syringe, use the needle to “scoop” up the cap
o (figure 6.2).
o With the cap now covering the needle tip, turn the syringe upright (vertical) so that
the needle and syringe are pointing toward the ceiling.
o Last, using the forefinger and thumb of your other hand, grasp the cap just above its
open end (figure 6.2) and push the cap firmly down onto the hub (the place where the
needle joins the syringe under the cap).
Seal sharps containers for transport to a secure area in preparation for disposal.
After closing and sealing sharps containers, never open, empty, or reuse them.
Manage/dispose of sharps waste in an efficient, safe, and environment-friendly way to
protect people from voluntary or accidental exposure to used injection equipment.
Disposal of used syringes, needles, and sharps containers.
The following guiding principles should be used for the disposal of syringes, needles, and
sharps containers:
o Dispose all sharps in a safety box immediately after injection.
o If the syringe is a retractable one, make sure to engage the retraction feature before
disposing of the syringe.
o Collect used syringes and needles at the point of use in an enclosed sharps container
(safety box) that is puncture- and leak-proof.
o Do not use boxes that are open, overflowing, or punctured. Get a new one instead.
Dispose safety boxes when they are three-quarters full.
o Dispose of the sharps and sharp containers by burning, burying, or encapsulation.
o Always put on heavy duty gloves when handling sharps containers.
Both private and public health facilities should use the syringes and needles listed above to provide
any type of injection. After a n injection, the syringe and needle should be disposed ina safety
box.
Special Note:
All patients undergoing an injection should be counseled before the injection is given (e.g., on the typeof
drug, side effects, possible adverse effects/events following the administration of the injection, and the total
number of doses to be given by injection).
Self-injecting patients, such as diabetic patients, should be properly informed about their medications and
how to ensure the safety of injection. If a patient needs to take the injection equipment home, he/she should
be counseled on the storage, disposal, and sterility of their drugs and equipment.
If the expiry date or time has passed (even if the vial contains antimicrobial
preservatives).
If it is not properly stored after opening, or within 28 days of opening, unless a shorter or
longer time frame is otherwise specified by the manufacturer, or follow the
manufacturer’s instructions for the time the vial can be used once opened.
If found to be undated, improperly stored, inadvertently contaminated, perceived to be
contaminated, or has a visible hole in the rubber septum, regardless of expiration date, if
thought to be a single-use rather than multi-dose vial.
Wipe the access rubber septum with 70% alcohol (isopropyl alcohol or ethanol) with a
swab or cotton-wool ball, and allow it to dry before piercing the vial or inserting a device
into the bottle.
Use a new, single-use, disposable, sterile syringe and needle for each insertion into a vial.
Never leave a needle in a multi-dose vial. This practice provides a direct route for
microorganisms, including HIV, to enter the bottle and contaminate the fluid between
each use.
Once the loaded syringe and needle have been withdrawn from a multi-dose vial,
administer the injection as soon as possible.
Reconstitution
Always use a sterile syringe and a sterile needle to withdraw the reconstitution solution
from an ampoule or a vial, insert the needle into the rubber septum in the single- or multi-
dose vial, and inject the necessary amount of reconstitution fluid.
Remove the needle and syringe and discard them immediately as a single unit into a
sharps container.
Mix the contents of the vial thoroughly until all visible particles have dissolved.
Delay in Administration
If a dose has been withdrawn into a syringe and cannot be administered immediately for
any reason, cover the needle with the cap using a one-handed scoop technique. Do not
keep the medication longer than 24 hours unless a shorter or longer time frame is
otherwise specified by the manufacturer. Inject the medication as soon as possible after
withdrawing from the vial. See the next section on labeling (WHO 2010).
Labeling
After reconstitution of a vaccine or medication in a multi-dose vial (e.g., BCG vaccine), label the vial
and the final medication container with:
Date and time of preparation
Type and volume of diluent (if applicable)
Final concentration
Expiry date and time after reconstitution
Name and signature of the person reconstituting the drug
For multi-dose medications that DO NOT require reconstitution (e.g., lignocaine), label the container
with:
Date and time of first piercing of the vial
Expiry date and time after reconstitution
Name and signature of the person first piercing the vial
General
When administering an injection:
Ensure that the patient is adequately prepared for and informed about the procedure.
Check the drug chart or prescription for the medication and the five “rights”: right patient,
right drug, right dose, right route, right time.
Perform hand hygiene.
Wipe the top of the vial with 70% alcohol (isopropyl alcohol or ethanol) using a swab or
cotton-wool ball. Allow it to dry.
Open the package in front of the patient to reassure the person that the syringe and needle
have not been used previously.
Use a sterile syringe and needle to withdraw the medication from the ampoule or vial.
Important points
DO NOT allow the needle to touch any contaminated surface.
DO NOT reuse a syringe, even if the needle has been changed.
DO NOT touch the rubber septum after disinfection with the 70% alcohol (isopropyl
alcohol or ethanol).
DO NOT reenter a multi-dose vial with the same needle used for mixing or reconstituting
medications.
DO NOT reenter a vial with a needle or syringe used on a patient if that vial will be used
to withdraw medication again (whether it is for the same patient or for another patient).
DO NOT use bags or bottles of intravenous solution as a common source of supply for
injections (e.g., normal saline flushes) for multiple patients. These are not manufactured
as multi-dose and do not have any preservative.
Withdraw the needle and syringe from the bottle and hold the syringe upright (needle pointing to the
ceiling) to see if any air is in the syringe. If there are air bubbles, slowly push the plunger in, but only
until the “fill line” mark is reached.
Check that the fluid level in the syringe is at or slightly above the “fill line” mark. If it is below the
fill line mark, there may not be enough medication to be effective and the injection should not be
administered. In this situation, either inject the medication back into the single dose bottle and draw
up the medication again using a new auto-disable syringe and needle, or discard the partially filled
syringe and use a new bottle and auto-disable syringe and needle.
Sharps Safety
Categories of Sharps:
Operating room-specific sharps requiring similar disposal include surgical drain trocars,
needle point cautery tips, wire sutures, orthopedic drill bits, and a range of hollow needle
injection.
Special needles used by radiologists and anesthesiologists for various medically invasive
procedures.
Routine use needles and other sharps (e.g., blades, pins).
SUMMARY
Injection safety is:
An integral component of IPC
An element of standard precautions
A key element of patient and HCWs safety
Supported by IPC policies and procedures, such as hand hygiene, housekeeping, and
waste management.
Injections present risks to patients, HCWs, and the community, and should be limited when
alternative administration routes are available. Safe injection practices are one of the components of
standard precautions. A safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the
HCW to any avoidable risks, and does not result in waste that is dangerous for the community (Rapiti,
Prüss-Üstün, Hutin 2005). Safe injection practices include the proper use of single-use and multi-
dose vials. It is the responsibility of each HCW to ensure safe injection practices for every patient.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 6: SHARPS AND INJECTION SAFETY
Altaf, A. 2018. Unsafe injection practices by medical practitioners in South Asia associated with hepatitis and
HIV outbreaks. Journal of Infectiology. 1. 1-3. 10.29245/2689-9981/2018/2.1113
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). 2019. Guideline for surgical attire. Denver, CO:
AORN, Inc. https://pdihc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/AORN-Guideline-for-Surgical-Attire.pdf
AORN. 2012. Recommended practices for sterile technique. In: Perioperative standards and recommended
practices, 2012 Ed. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc.
Bearman, G, Bryant, K, Leekha, S, et al. 2014. Healthcare personnel attire in non-operating-room settings.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(2):107–121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24442071/
Bhalla, A, Pultz, NJ, Gries, DM, et al. 2004. Acquisition of nosocomial pathogens on hands after contact with
environmental surfaces near hospitalized patients. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 25(2):164–
167. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14994944/.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020. The National Personal Protective Technology
Laboratory (NPPTL). Respirator trusted-source information.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/respsource.html.
CDC. 2016. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Bloodborne infectious diseases:
HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/bbp/.
CDC. 2018. Guidance on personal protective equipment to be used by healthcare workers during
management of patients with Ebola Virus Disease in U.S. hospitals, including procedures for putting on
(donning) and removing (doffing). http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html.
CDC. 2014b. Ebola: Personal protective equipment (PPE) donning and doffing procedures. Doffing PPE:
Remove outer apron. Video. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/hcp/ppe-
training/n95Respirator_Coveralls/doffing_04.html.
CDC. 2020. The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL): Considerations for selecting
protective clothing used in healthcare for protection against microorganisms in blood and body fluids.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/protectiveclothing/.
Department of Health And Human Services. CDC. 2004. Guidance for the selection and use of personal
protective equipment (PPE) in healthcare settings. Document modified in 10/20/21.
https://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/ppe/PPEslides6-29-04.pdf.
Davis, MS. 2001. Advanced precautions for today’s OR: The operating room professional's handbook for the
prevention of sharps injuries and bloodborne exposures, 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Sweinbinder Publications
LLC.
Doyle, GR and McCutcheon, J. 2015. Clinical procedures for safer patient care. Boston, MA: BCcampus.
Duckro, AN, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, et al. 2005. Transfer of vancomycin-resistant enterococci via health care
worker hands. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(3):302–307. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15710793/.
Elliott, M. and Liu, Y. 2010. The nine rights of medication administration: An overview. British Journal of
Nursing, 19, 300-305. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20335899/
Federal Ministry of Health, Ethiopia. 2012. Infection prevention and patient safety reference manual for
service providers and managers in healthcare facilities of Ethiopia, second edition.
http://repository.iifphc.org/bitstream/handle/123456789/651/8%20Infection%20prevention%20and%20patien
t%20safety%20Reference%20manual%20for%20service%20providers%20and%20Managers%20in%20hea
lthcare%20facilities%20second%20edition%20February%2C%202012.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Gammon, J, Morgan-Samuel, H, Gould, D. 2008. A review of the evidence for suboptimal compliance of
healthcare practitioners to standard/universal infection control precautions. Journal of Clinical Nursing,
17(2):157–167. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17331098/.
Garner, JS. 1996. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17(1): 53‒80.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8789689/.
Gershon, R. 1996. Facilitator report: Bloodborne pathogens exposure among healthcare workers. American
Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(4): 418–420. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0274(199604)29:4%3C418::AID-AJIM29%3E3.0.CO;2-3.
Gershon, R, Zirkin, B. 1995. Behavioral factors in safety training. In Laboratory safety, principles and
practices, 2nd ed. Flemming, DO, et al (eds). Washington DC: AMS Press.
Gershon, R, & Vlahov, D. 1992. Assessing and reducing HIV risk to the critical care nurse. In Critical care
nursing currents. Ross Laboratories.
Gralton, J, Rawlinson, WD, McLaws, ML. 2013. Health care workers’ perceptions predicts uptake of
personal protective equipment. American Journal of Infection Control, 41(1):2–7.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22633133/.
Gupta, E, Bajpai, M, Sharma, P, et al. 2013. Unsafe injection practices: a potential weapon for the outbreak
of blood borne viruses in the community. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 3(2), 177–181.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.113657
Habtetsion T, Bock A, Noel M, Shanadi Bhat D, Abebe F, Van Roekel K. Evaluation of Injection Safety and
Health Care Waste Management in Ethiopia: 2009 First Draft Report, September 2009 edition. Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia MMIS for the Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator, and the Department of Health and Human
Services/USAID. Development. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadr654.pdf.
Hutin, YJ, Hauri, AM, Armstrong, GL. 2003. Use of injections in healthcare settings worldwide, 2000:
literature review and regional estimates. BMJ, 327(7423):1075. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14604927/
International Labour Organization (ILO) and World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. Joint ILO/WHO
guidelines on health services and HIV/AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO and WHO.
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/prev_care/ilowhoguidelines.pdf?ua=1.
Lipscomb, J, Rosenstock, L. 1997. Health care workers: protecting those who protect our health. Infection
Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 18(6):397–399. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/infection-
control-and-hospital-epidemiology/article/healthcare-workers-protecting-those-who-protect-our-
health/E00E025D082591D932FC8D43BD3C8DEF.
Loeb, M, McGeer, A, Henry, B, et al. 2004. SARS among critical care nurses, Toronto. Emerging Infectious
Diseases, 10(2):251–255. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322898/.
Mischke, C, Verbeek, JH, Saarto, A, et al. 2014. Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for
preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database Systematic
Reviews, 3(CD009573). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24610769/.
Pratt, R J, Hoffman, PN, and Robb, F. 2005. The need for skin preparation prior to injection: point —
counterpoint. British Journal of Infection Control, 6(4): 18–20. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-
need-for-skin-preparation-prior-to-injection%3A-%E2%80%94-Pratt-
Hoffman/c4dd4b63dcf1223261f7a0a2db6d2068ff2ba78f
Ravi, AD, Sadhna, D, Nagpaal, D, et al. 2015. Needle free injection technology: A complete
insight. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 5(4):192-199.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26682189/
Rothrock, J, Mcowen D, Smith, D (eds). 2003. Alexander’s care of the patient in surgery, 16th ed. St Louis,
MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc.
Secured Medical Direction UK Co, Ltd. 2012. Products: Surgical gown. http://www.smd-
medical.com/catalogue/non-woven/8-Chemo-Gown-CATALOGUE.pdf.
Seto, WH, Tsang, D, Yung, RWH, et al. 2003. Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in
prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet,
361(9368):1519–1520. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12737864/.
Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, et al. 2007. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: Preventing
transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/isolation-guidelines-H.pdf.
Suleman, S, Sabitu, K, and Idris SH. 2013. Elimination of unnecessary injection through health education on
injection safety and rational prescription among primary health care workers in Katsina state, Nigeria. Jos
Journal of Medicine, 7 (1), 2015–2020. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jjm/article/view/89179
Tomas ME, Kundrapu S, Thota P, et al. 2015. Contamination of health care personnel during removal of
personal protective equipment. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine,
175(12):1904–1910. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26457544/.
Tietjen, LG, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities with
limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
Tietjen, LG, Cronin, W, McIntosh, N. 1992. Infection prevention guidelines for family planning service
programs: Handwashing and gloving. Durant, OK: Essential Medical Information Systems, Inc.
Tietjen, LG, Cronin, W., McIntosh, N. 1992. Traffic flow. In Infection prevention guidelines for family planning
programs. Durant, OK: Essential Medical Information Systems, Inc.
US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OHSA). 2001. Revision to OSHA's
bloodborne pathogens standard. https://www.osha.gov/needlesticks/needlefact.html.
Valim, MD, Marziale, MHP, Richart-Martínez, M, et al. 2014. Instruments for evaluating compliance with
infection control practices and factors that affect it: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(11–
12):1502–1519. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24004371/.
Watt, AM, Patkin, M, Sinnott, MJ, et al. 2010. Scalpel safety in the operative setting: A systematic review.
Surgery, 147(1):98–106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19828169/.
WHO. World Alliance for Patient Safety. 2006. Information sheet 6: The first global patient safety challenge:
Clean care is safer care. http://www.who.int/gpsc/tools/Infsheet6.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2004. Making pregnancy safer: The critical role of the skilled attendant. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.unscn.org/layout/modules/resources/files/Making_pregnancy_safer_the_critical_role.pdf.
WHO. 2008a. How to put on and take off personal protective equipment (PPE).
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70066.
WHO. 2008b. Infection control strategies for specific procedures in health-care facilities: Epidemic-prone
and pandemic-prone acute respiratory diseases: A quick reference guide.
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/WHO_CDS_HSE_2008_2/en/.
WHO. 2009a. WHO Guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: First global patient safety challenge.
Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf.
WHO. 2003. Aide-Memoire for a strategy to protect health workers from infection with bloodborne viruses.
http://www.who.int/occupational_health/activities/1am_hcw.pdf.
WHO. 2010. WHO best practices for injections and related procedures toolkit. Geneva: WHO.
https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/52712/retrieve
WHO. 2015. WHO calls for worldwide use of "smart" syringes. https://www.who.int/news/item/23-02-2015-
who-calls-for-worldwide-use-of-smart-syringes
WHO. 2017. make smart injection choices, guiding safe and appropriate injection practices.
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/integrated-health-services-(ihs)/infection-prevention-and-
control/injection-safety/advocacy/is_professionalassociations_leaflet.pdf?sfvrsn=7bc270fc_7&ua=1
Wilburn, SQ and Eijkemans, G. 2004. Preventing needle stick injuries among healthcare workers: A WHO–
ICN collaboration. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 10:451–456.
https://saudesemdano.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/2064/Preventing_Needlestick_Injuries.pdf
Key Topics
Level of disinfection or sterilization required
Guideline for processing instruments
Commonly used disinfectants
Cleaning
High-level disinfection
Chemical disinfectants
Preparation and packaging for reprocessing
Processing of endoscopes
Sterilization
Safe transport and sterile storage
BACKGROUND
Because the prime concern of safety procedures is to protect both patients and staff from infection,
the transmission of infection from medical devices and equipment contaminated with a patient’s body
fluid is the focal area of interventions in health facilities. Instruments that are reused without being
properly processed and made safe are one of the causes of infections in developing countries. HCWs
are increasingly at risk of becoming infected with serious bloodborne viruses, such as HBV, HCV,
and HIV. Some research findings show that there are 8 to 16 million new infections of HBV annually
due to unsterile injections in developing countries. On the other hand, it was found that HIVsurvives
in needles and syringes up to 42 days depending on temperature and other factors (Abdala,Stephens,
Griffith, et al. 1999). Therefore, the greatest risk results from staff’s direct contact with these life-
threatening infections when they perform or assist with surgical procedures (physicians, nurses, and
midwives); process surgical instruments and equipment (staff); and perform housekeeping and waste
management tasks, including disposal of infectious waste items.
The basic IP processes recommended to reduce disease transmission from soiled instruments,
surgical gloves, and other reusable items are by way of, cleaning, and either sterilization or HLD.
Regardless of the type of operative procedures, the steps in processing surgical instruments and other
items are the same (figure 7.1).
In the effort to create an infection-free environment, it is important that the rationale for each
recommended IP process and their limitations be clearly understood by clinic staff at all levels, from
healthcare providers to cleaning and maintenance personnel. IP principles require that all reused
medical equipment be properly processed before reusing them to avert infections related to medical
equipment. Processing reusable instruments is not knowledge and technology intensive. Rather,
personnel need only simple and basic training on how to process them after procedures.
After completing an operation or invasive medical procedure or when still wearing gloves, the
physician or assistant should dispose of contaminated objects (gauze or cotton and other waste items)
in a plastic bag or leak-proof covered container. Disposable sharps (e.g., scalpel blades and suture
needles) should be placed in a sharps container. Afterwards, all reusable items should be
cleaned at the point of use (soaked in a solution of warm water and detergent to prevent blood from
drying on the surface of the items).
Following precleaning at the point of use, the instruments and reusable items are transported to an
instrument processing area, preferably centrally, where they should be thoroughly cleaned with soap
and water and be completely rinsed and dried.
Figure 7.1. Workflow for instrument processing and other medical devices
POINT-OF-USE
CLEANING
(Occurs immediately after use)
CLEANING
Thoroughly wash, rinse, and dry
COOL Store
appropriately or
use immediately
Each item, be it soiled or non-soiled metal instruments, requires special handling and processing to:
Minimize the risk of accidental injury or exposure to blood or body fluids to the
cleaning and housekeeping staff.
Provide a high-quality end product. Specific procedures for processing instruments,
equipment, and other items used to provide healthcare services are summarized in figure
7.1.
Active in the presence of organic matter and compatible with soaps, detergents, and other
chemicals encountered in use
Non-toxic
Does not cause the deterioration of cloth, rubber, plastics, and other materials
Leaves an antimicrobial film on the treated surface
Easy to use with clear label instructions
Pleasant odor or no odor to facilitate its routine use
Not prohibitively high in cost
Soluble in water
Stable in concentrate and at use-dilution
Good cleaning properties
Environmentally friendly on disposal
The most commonly used chemical disinfectants in healthcare settings are:
Alcohols
Chlorine and chlorine releasing compounds
Sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach)
Calcium hypochlorite or chlorinated lime
Sodium dichloroisocyanurate
Glutaraldehyde
Iodine and iodophor solutions
Hydrogen peroxide
Alcohols
Ethyl and isopropyl (2-propyl) alcohol (60% to 90%) are disinfectants that are relatively cheap and
commonly available. Their rapid action and absence of chemical residue make them ideal for
disinfection of many medical items. The activity of both alcohols, however, drops sharply when
diluted below 50%. To attain better results, the optimal concentration of the solution should be kept
between 60% to 90% with water (volume/volume).
Advantages
Rapidly kill all fungi and bacteria, including mycobacteria. Isopropyl alcohol kills
most viruses, including HBV and HIV, whereas ethyl alcohol kills all viruses. Both are
also tuberculocidal (Rutala 1996).
Limitations
Evaporate rapidly making extended contact time difficult unless the items are immersed.
Do not penetrate organic material and are easily inactivated.
Are flammable.
May swell or harden rubber and plastic materials if used repeatedly or for prolonged
periods of time.
Damage shellac mounting of lenses in endoscopes.
Hypochlorites are the most widely used chemicals among chlorine disinfectants and are available in
liquid (sodium hypochlorite) and solid (calcium hypochlorite and sodium dichloroisocyanurate)
forms. Chlorine-releasing compounds are available in powder (calcium hypochlorite or chlorinated
lime) or tablet form (sodium dichloroisocyanurate) (Rutala, Cole, Thomann, et al. 1998).
According to the WHO and PAHO (2016), soaking instruments in 0.5% chlorine solution or any
other disinfectant before cleaning is not recommended for the following reasons:
Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde in both liquid and gaseous forms can be used for chemical sterilization and as a HLD
(Taylor, Barbeito & Gremillion 1969; Tulis 1973). A commercially available solution of
formaldehyde (Formalin), which contains 35% to 40% formaldehyde by weight, should be diluted
with boiled water (1:5) to a final solution containing about 8% formaldehyde. Despite its limitation,
formaldehyde continues to be used in many countries because both liquid and solid forms
(paraformaldehyde) are cheap and readily available. Its use in hospitals and clinics has persisted for
many years. Switching to a less toxic compound, such as glutaraldehyde or other newer HLDs, is
strongly recommended but difficult to implement because of the high cost of these alternatives.
Note: Formaldehyde is being used as a HLD and as a sterilant in Ethiopia, but it is slowly being phased out
globally because of its toxicity.
Advantages
Not readily inactivated by organic materials.
Can be used for up to 14 days.
Can safely be used on surgical endoscopes (laparoscopes) because 8% formaldehyde
will not corrode metal or damage instruments lenses, plastics, or rubber.
Limitations
Causes skin irritation.
Is a potential carcinogen.
Irritates the skin, eyes, and respiratory tract, even at low concentrations.
For sterilization, 24 hours soaking in 8% formaldehyde solution kills all microorganisms,
including bacterial endospores.
This compound produces a dangerous gas (bis-chloroethyl-ether) when mixed with chlorine.
Glutaraldehyde
Glutaraldehydes are widely used for chemical sterilization and HLD of medical instruments.
Aqueous solutions are acidic (pH < 7) and are activated only when made alkaline. There are
many types of glutaraldehydes available worldwide. The most commonly used antiseptic is an
alkaline-stabilized 2% glutaraldehyde available commercially as Cidex® or Cidex 7®. These
chemicals, which are derivatives of formaldehyde, are also irritating, and their fumes are very
unpleasant. Therefore, they should be used only in well-ventilated rooms. Because the stability and
activity of glutaraldehydes vary considerably depending on how they are prepared and stored, the
manufacturer’s directions must be followed carefully.
Advantages
Not readily inactivated by organic materials.
Can generally be used for up to 14 to 28 days.
Can safely be used on surgical endoscopes (laparoscopes) because it will not corrode
metal or damage lenses instruments (endoscopes), plastics, or rubber.
Limitations
Can cause skin irritation or dermatitis with chronic exposure.
Vapors are irritating to mucous membranes (eye, nose, and mouth) and respiratory tract.
Works best at room temperature (20 °C to 25 °C or 68 °F to 77 °F).
Is costly
Orthophthalaldehyde (OPA)
Orthophthalaldehyde (OPA) has several features that makes it a good choice for HLD of instruments
and medical devices. It is relatively fast-acting, it is non-irritating to the eyes and nasal mucosa, and
it does not require activation. It kills all vegetative bacteria, fungi, and non-enveloped and enveloped
viruses. It does not kill all bacterial spores; therefore, it cannot be used to achieve sterilization. It is
compatible with most metals and plastics, and can be used to process most endoscopes. However,
there are reports of serious anaphylactic reaction in bladder cancer patients; therefore, OPA should
not be used to process scopes for use in patients with bladder cancer.
Once the OPA solution is poured into the disinfection container, it can be used for 14 days as long as
the solution concentration meets the minimum effective concentration. The concentration must be
tested using the approved test strips provided by the manufacturer before the first use and then
regularly to assure that the minimum concentration is met. The manufacturer recommends testing the
solution before each use, and it should be done daily, at a minimum. A log should be kept
documenting the quality control results. OPA must be used within 24 months of the date of
manufacture. Unopened bottles should be stored in a cool, dry place. Once the bottle of OPA is
opened, it must be discarded within 75 days or by the bottle expiration date, whichever date comes
first. HCWs handling OPA must wear PPE, including gloves and face and eye protection. OPA stains
unprotected skin gray.
Items should be thoroughly cleaned and dried before OPA disinfection. The contact time for HLD
using OPA is 12 minutes at 20 °C (68 °F). Ensure that all surfaces and lumens contact the disinfectant
for the entire soaking time. This means lumens must be filled with disinfectant and free of air bubbles.
After disinfection time, items are removed from the disinfection solution and rinsed. OPA requires
three complete rinses in water for one minute each. Items that may come in contact with non-intact
skin and mucous membranes may be rinsed with clean, potable water. If the water quality is not
reliable, a final rinse with 70% isopropyl alcohol will help eliminate any microbes and speed the
drying process. When used for HLD of endoscopes, all lumens and channels should be rinsed with
70% alcohol after the third water rinse to help dry the channels. If items are not rinsed properly, the
residual OPA can causes staining of patient’s and HCW’s skin.
OPA can be safely disposed of in a sewerage system. No deactivation is required before disposal
down the drain, although it should be accompanied with large amounts of water.
OPA is not approved for sterilization. If sterilization methods are not available and OPA is used to
high-level disinfect items that will be used on sterile tissue, the three rinses should be done with
sterile water.
Note:
For many years, Iodophors manufactured for use as antiseptics proved to be ineffective for disinfecting
inorganic objects and surfaces. Usually, antiseptics have significantly less iodine (Rutala 1996). Whatever
the case may be, it is good to make sure that labels are checked.
Iodophors are not HLDs because conclusive evidence is lacking on their effectiveness against
bacterial endospores and some fungi. For example, Pseudomonas species, a group of gram-negative
bacteria, have been known to multiply in Iodophors (Favero 1985; Rutala 1993). These solutionsare
generally nontoxic and nonirritating to the skin and mucous membranes. Iodophors must be properly
diluted to be effective. Interestingly enough, correctly diluted Iodophors have more active killing
power than the full strength Iodophors due to the decreased availability of “free” iodine in the latter.
Advantages
They do not cause deterioration or softening of plastic items if they are kept dry between
soakings.
Diluted solutions of iodine and Iodophors are nontoxic and nonirritating (unless there is
a known allergy to it).
Can be used for disinfection of blood culture bottles and medical equipment, such
as thermometers.
Limitations
It is an oxidizing agent (causes rust) and should be used only for high-quality stainless-
steel equipment or plastic materials.
Like alcohol and chlorine, iodine and Iodophors are inactivated by organic materials;
therefore, only previously cleaned instruments should be placed in iodine or Iodophor
solutions.
Note: To effectively avoid inactivation, medical articles/equipment should first be thoroughly rinsed with
sterile water or boiled and filtered (if necessary) water at least three times after soaking.
Allergic reactions can also occur to the staff handling iodine solutions and Iodophors. Therefore, they
are:
Primarily used as antiseptic for skin and mucous membranes (aqueous preparations only).
Used for decontamination when the commercial preparation with aqueous solutions is
available but must be made fresh on daily basis.
Hydrogen Peroxide
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is often available locally, is relatively cheaper than any other chemical
disinfectant, and can be used to achieve HLD and sterilization. It has activity against a wide range of
microorganisms, including vegetative bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Hydrogen peroxide (3% solution)
works effectively at lower pH and is stable at room temperature. Hydrogen peroxide does not damage
glass and plastic articles and is safe on ventilators. It does have compatibility concerns with selected
metals, therefore, approval from the device manufacturer should be obtained before use of this
method on items where corrosion would be a concern. It has a low toxicity and irritancy rating. No
activation is required.
A 3% solution can achieve HLD using a contact time of 30 minutes at 20 °C (68 °F). To achieve
sterilization, a higher concentration (7.5% solution) and a longer contact time are required (6 hours
at 20 °C [68 °F]).
Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for product-specific contact time. After the first use, hydrogen
peroxide can be used for a maximum of 21 days. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide must be
monitored regularly by testing the minimum effective concentration. Items processed using hydrogen
peroxide should be thoroughly rinsed with plenty of water. Chemical irritation has been identified in
an endoscopy unit where endoscopes were disinfected with hydrogen peroxide.
The major limitation of this compound is that it is highly corrosive and should not be used to disinfect
copper, aluminum, zinc, or brass. It loses its potency rapidly when exposed to heat and light; it should
be stored in a cool and dark place. WHO does not recommend using H2O2 in hot (tropical) climates
where there are inadequate facilities to keep the product cool because of its instability in the presence
of heat and light (WHO 1989).
Storage of Disinfectants
Chemical disinfectants should be stored in a cool and dark area.
Never store chemicals in direct sunlight or in excessive heat (e.g., upper shelves in a
tin-roofed building).
Cleaning
Cleaning is a critical step in instrument processing because:
It makes instruments safer for additional processing, which reduces the risk of infection
for the HCWs who handle the instruments.
It reduces damage to the instruments. At the end of a clinical or surgical procedure,
surgical instruments and equipment are contaminated with tissue particles, body fluids,
and blood. Long contact with blood is corrosive and can damage surgical instruments.
It makes the instruments easier to process. Once blood dries on an instrument, it is
difficult to clean, especially if the blood has entered the hinges and sockets.
Bioburden and residual cleaning agents remaining on an item can inactivate chemical
disinfectants or sterilants, and protect microorganisms from destruction, which can result
in disinfection and sterilization failures (Zuhlsdorf, et al. 2004). In addition, instruments
and materials used during an operation will be covered with blood and tissue remains.
They may have been in touch also with chemicals and fluids, dirt, and dust. Hinged
instruments may have remnants of blood and tissue from the operation. The tubing of
hollow instruments may be also full of these soiled materials.
Therefore, it is important to follow all the necessary steps to properly clean instruments before HLD
or sterilization. Before transport to the instrument processing area, HCWs should perform point-of-
use cleaning—wiping instruments to remove tissue and blood immediately at the conclusion of the
procedure.
Once instruments are in the instrument processing area, cleaning involves thorough cleaning of
instruments with water and a detergent and/or an enzymatic cleaner followed by thorough rinsing,
and then drying before further processing.
Cleaning is a process of physically removing infectious agents and other organic matters on which
they live and thrive but does not necessarily destroy infectious agents. It is an essential prerequisite
to ensure effective disinfection or sterilization by reducing the number of microorganisms, especially
endospores causing tetanus usually found on soiled instruments and equipment. Neither sterilization
nor HLD can be effective without prior cleaning (Porter 1987).
Cleaning using hand soap (bar) or powdered laundry detergent is not advisable because the fatty acids
in them react with the minerals in hard water leaving a residue or scum (insoluble calcium salt) that
is difficult to remove. Using liquid soap, however, is better in that it mixes more easily with water
than bar or powdered soaps. It can also break fats and grease very easily, making the cleaning process
easier and more effective. The water used for cleaning purposes should be tap water that is not
contaminated. If this is not possible, one may optionally use water boiled for 10 minutes and filtered
to remove particulate matter (if necessary), or chlorinated water, water treated with a diluted bleach
solution (sodium hypochlorite) to make the final concentration 0.001%.
It is not advisable to use abrasive cleaners (e.g., Vim® or Comet®) or steel wool because these
products can scratch or pit metal or stainless steel. These scratches then become a good hiding place
for microorganisms and make cleaning more difficult, hence increasing the chance of rusting.
Note:Many cleaning products contain ammonia, which can interact with bleach and cause the formation of
toxic fumes. Check the label of any cleaning product to see if it contains ammonia. (Sometimes you can be
alerted about it if you encounter the pungent smell of ammonia when opening the container.)
One can clean without sterilizing, but one cannot sterilize without cleaning!
As shown in table 7.2, most microorganisms (up to 80%) in blood and other organic material are
removed during the cleaning process. Moreover, a study showed that following the standard cleaning,
most non lumen surgical instruments were found to contain less than 100 colony-forming units
consisting of relatively non-pathogenic microorganisms (Rutala, Cole, Thomann, et al. 1998). This
study confirmed that thorough cleaning is more effective than was previously assumed, and
documented the importance of cleaning in producing the desired safe outcome of surgery.
Once an item is washed, it also needs to be rinsed and dried. Thorough rinsing with clean water
removes any soap residue that can interfere with sterilization or HLD. After rinsing, items should be
dried, especially if they will be sterilized or high-level disinfected using chemical disinfectants.
It should be noted that water possibly remaining on the surgical articles/equipment (e.g., surgical
instruments), if not dried well, dilutes the solution and may hamper the process.
2. Fill sink or appropriate basin with sufficient warm water for complete immersion of the
devices being cleaned.
3. Add the appropriate quantity of detergent following the manufacturer’s instructions for
dosage.
4. Clean the device under the surface of the water so that aerosols are not produced.
5. Use appropriate brushes to properly clean box locks, lumens, and other hard-to-clean areas.
Use soft (nylon) bristle brushes so that the surface of the instrument is not damaged.
Brushes used to clean lumens must be the same diameter as the instrument to ensure that
all internal surfaces can be reached.
Brushes must also be long enough to exit the distal end of the instrument.
NOTE: Brushes should be thermally or chemically disinfected at the end of the day. If this is not
possible, they should be cleaned and left to dry. Brushes should be replaced when damaged.
6. In another sink or basin, completely immerse the device in clean purified water and rinse the
device thoroughly.
7. Air-dry or hand-dry using a disposable clean, non-linting cloth.
Note:
Instruments that will be further processed with chemical solutions must dry completely to avoid diluting the
chemicals; however, items to be treated with HLD by boiling or steaming do not need to be dried first.
Items that cannot be cleaned thoroughly should not be reused but s h o u l d be discarded after
use.
Summary of Cleaning
Surgical instruments should be disassembled to allow for effective cleaning.
Physical cleaning reduces the bioburden or the microbial load sufficiently to allow the
process of sterilization or HLD to be effective.
Dirt protects microorganisms from contact with the disinfectants, steam, and other
chemicals, thereby rendering the process ineffective.
Some chemicals used for reprocessing devices are inactivated in the presence of organic
matter.
Some chemicals used for reprocessing are inactivated when mixed with other chemicals
(incompatible).
The life of the instruments is prolonged if soil and debris are removed regularly.
Cleaning Products
There is no single cleaning agent that removes all types of bioburden. Bioburden is made up of a
variety of matter, which may be soluble or insoluble in water and can be organic or inorganic.
Remember: Enzymatic cleaners are not disinfectants; they only remove protein from surfaces. Rubber or
nitrile gloves are recommended when handling enzymatic solutions. Enzymatic cleaners will degrade latex
gloves.
Summary of Recommendations
Disposable sharps shall be disposed of in an appropriate, puncture-resistant, sharps
container at the point of use prior to transportation.
Soiled medical devices shall be handled in a manner that reduces the risk of exposure
and/or injury to staff/visitors/patients/residents or contamination of environmental
surfaces.
Contaminated devices shall not be transported through areas designated for the storage of
clean or sterile supplies, visit/patient/resident care areas, or high-traffic areas.
Sterile and soiled devices should not be transported together.
Reusable medical devices must be thoroughly cleaned before disinfection or sterilization.
If cleaning cannot be done immediately, the medical device should be pretreated to
prevent organic matter from drying on it.
The process for cleaning (decontamination) should include written protocols for
disassembly, sorting, pretreatment, physical removal of organic material, rinsing, and
drying.
It is strongly recommended that catheters, tubing, and other medical devices with small
lumens that are very difficult to clean be designated as single-use material and not be
reprocessed and reused.
Assembly
The purpose of assembly and checking is to ensure that:
All devices are present in accordance with the surgical tray list.
All devices are assembled correctly in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
All devices are placed in the correct tray in a manner that ensures ease of use by the user.
The area where assembly and checking takes place should be a designated and controlled area to
optimize the effect of the sterilization process and minimize the contamination of the sets.
High-Level Disinfection
Sterilization is the safest and most effective method for the reprocessing of surgical instruments
because it kills all vegetative microorganisms and microbial spores. However, sterilization is not
always suitable because some materials cannot withstand the high temperatures used during the
sterilization process and sterilization may not be consistently available in some low-resource settings.
There are three levels of disinfection: low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level. The level of
disinfection needed is based on how the item will be used. Per the Spaulding classification, devices
that come in contact with intact skin are classified as non-critical items and should be processed by
intermediate- or low-level disinfection. Surgical instruments and medical devices that come in
contact with non-intact skin or mucous membranes (classified as semi-critical devices) must, at a
minimum, be high-level disinfected, although sterilization is always preferable, when possible.
boiled gloves is not practical because it is difficult to prevent contamination while they are being
dried in the open air. If steaming is instead opted for, they remain in the closed steamer pan, which
results in little or no contamination of the gloves.
The major limitation of steaming is that if the steamers available locally are small, they can practically
be used only for a small number of items (e.g., one set of instruments or 15 to 20 pairs ofsurgical
gloves) per tray or pan. For steaming to be effective, the bottom pan must contain enough water to
continue boiling throughout the steaming process. By contrast, large boiling pots are easier to use
for metal instruments and do not need to be monitored the entire time to be sure that theprocess is
being done correctly.
Both boiling and steaming share some advantages and limitations over chemical HLD, which is the
only other method of HLD.
Advantages
Inexpensive procedures
Easily taught to HCWs
Requires no special chemicals or dilutions and leaves no chemical residue
Heat sources (boilers or rice cookers) are commonly available
Limitations
Length of processing time must be carefully measured (i.e., start timing only after
the steam begins to escape or water has reached a rolling boil). Once timing starts, no
additional items or water can be added.
Objects cannot be packaged before HLD; therefore, there is a greater chance of
contamination if the items are to be stored.
Requires a fuel source that may be unreliable.
Note:
A study documented that the interior temperature of a plastic cannula floating on the surface of
boiling water reaches a temperature of 96 °C to 98 °C in less than a minute. Therefore, for items
that float (e.g., syringes, plastic manual vacuum aspiration [MVA] cannula, or rubber items), it
is not necessary that they be fully covered by the water to achieve HLD if the pot is covered
with a lid Greenslade et al. 1993).
STEP 3 Close the lid over the pan and bring the water to a gentle rolling boil. Boiling too vigorously
wastes fuel, rapidly evaporates the water, and may damage delicate (or sharp) instruments
or other items. A gentle rolling boil is sufficient and will prevent instrumentsor other items
from being bounced around and possibly damaged by striking otherinstruments or the side
walls of the pot.
STEP 4 Start timer. In the HLD log, note the time on the clock and record the time when the rolling
boil begins.
STEP 5 Boil all items for the required time: 30 minutes at 77 °C (170.6 °F) or 20 minutes at 100
°C (212 °F).
Tips on Boiling
Always boil for the required time period in a container with a lid.
Start timing when the water begins to boil.
Metal instruments should be completely covered with water during boiling.
Do not add anything to the pot after timing begins.
STEP 6 Remove all items after the recommended time with a high-level disinfected forceps. Never
leave boiled instruments in the water that has stopped boiling. As the water cools and the
steam condenses, air and dust particles are drawn down into the container and may
contaminate the instruments (Perkins 1983).
STEP 7 Use instruments and other items immediately, or pick them up with high-level disinfected
forceps or gloves and place the objects in a high-level disinfected container with atight-
fitting cover. If any pooled water remains in the bottom of the container, remove thealready
dried items, and place them in another high-level disinfected container that is dryand can
be tightly covered.
HLD by steaming is an option for plastic items used for patient care.
Two types of tests were conducted to determine whether surgical gloves and other items could be
high-level disinfected using this process. In the first set of experiments, a thermocouple was placed
inside a glove in each of the three pans and the rate and extent of the temperature change was
recorded. When 5 to 15 pairs of surgical gloves were placed in each of the three pans, the temperature
reached 96 °C to 98 °C in less than four minutes in the bottom and middle pans, and within six
minutes in the upper pan. Thereafter, the temperature remained constant throughout the remaining
20 minutes. In the second set of experiments, batches of new surgical gloves were contaminated with
Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans,
and Bacillus subtilis (heat-sensitive) and Bacillus stearothermophilus (heat- resistant) endospores.
Next, the gloves were placed in each of the three pans and steamed for 20 minutes. After this, the
gloves were removed from the pans and incubated for 24 hours in sterile media and then were placed
on blood agar. In all cases (6, 15, and 30 gloves per pan), there was no growth of any microorganisms
or B. subtilis endospores within 24 hours. As was expected, only a reduction in the number of B.
stearothermophilus (heat-resistant) endospores occurred, nothing more than that.
STEP 5 When steam begins to come out between the pans and the lid, start the timer or note the time
on a clock and record the time in the HLD log.
STEP 6 Steam items for 20 minutes.
STEP 7 Remove the top steamer pan and put the lid on the pan that was below it (the pan now on
top). Gently shake excess water from the pan just removed.
STEP 8 Put the pan just removed onto the empty pan (Step 3). Repeat until all pans are restackedon
this empty pan and cover the top pan with the lid. This step allows the items to cool and
dry without becoming contaminated.
STEP 9 Allow items to dry in the air while in the steamer pans (1 to 2 hours) before using.
STEP 10 Using high-level disinfected forceps, transfer the dry items to dry, high-level disinfected
containers with a tight-fitting cover. Instruments and other items can also be stored in
the stacked and covered steamer pans as long as a bottom pan (with no holes) is used.
For large containers, fill a plastic container with 0.5% chlorine solution and immerse the
cover in chlorine solution as well. Then soak them for 20 minutes. Thereafter, rinse the
cover and the inside of the container three times with boiled water and allow them to dry
in the air. Note that large metal containers cannot be high-level disinfected using
chemicals.
Sterilization
Sterilization is a process in which the destruction of all microorganisms, including bacterial
endospores, takes place. This can be achieved by either physical or chemical methods and is
especially necessary for medical devices penetrating sterile body sites or having direct contact with
the blood (Spaulding 1939).
The proper sterilization of medical devices, surgical instruments, supplies, and equipment used in
direct patient care and/or surgery is very critical in the modern healthcare delivery system and has
great impact on patients’ safety. Sterilization in health facilities can be achieved by high-pressure
steam (autoclaves), dry heat (oven), chemical sterilants (glutaraldehyde or formaldehyde solutions),
or physical agents (radiation).
Note: Rinsing an item with alcohol and then igniting it with a match (flaming) is not an effective method of
disinfection or sterilization.
The Effectiveness of Any Sterilization Method is Also Dependent on Four Other Factors
1. The type of microorganism present
2. The number of microorganisms present
3. The amount and type of organic material that protects the microorganisms. Blood or
tissue remaining on poorly cleaned instruments acts as a shield to microorganisms during the
sterilization process.
4. The number of cracks and scratches on an instrument that might harbor microorganisms.
Important Reminder: Sterilization is a process, not a single event; therefore, all phases and steps in
the process must be carried out correctly.
Method of Sterilization
High-pressure steam sterilization (autoclaves)
Dry heat sterilization (oven)
Chemical sterilization
Other methods
Note: Pressure settings (kPa or lbs/in2) may vary slightly depending on the sterilizer used.
When possible, follow the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Remember:
Exposure time begins only after the sterilizer has reached the target temperature.
Do not overload the sterilizer (leave at least 7.5 cm [3 inches] between the items and walls of
sterilizer). Overloading alters heat convection and increases the time required to sterilize.
Advantages
Most commonly used effective method of sterilization.
Sterilization cycle time is shorter in steam sterilization than in any other type of
sterilization.
Limitations
Requires a continuous source of heat (wood fuel, kerosene, or electricity).
Requires a trained biomedical technician to perform preventative maintenance.
Requires strict adherence to time, temperature, and pressure settings.
Difficult to produce dry packs because breaks in procedure are common (e.g., not
allowing items to dry before removing, especially in hot, humid climates).
Repeated sterilization cycles can cause pitting and dulling of cutting edges of instruments
(i.e., scissors).
Plastic items cannot withstand high temperatures.
Prevacuum
Flash or immediate use sterilizers
Prevacuum Sterilizers
These sterilizers are similar to the gravity displacement sterilizers except that they have a vacuum
pump system to remove the air in the chamber before the steam is let in. This step reduces the
total cycle time. Most prevacuum sterilizers are operated at the same temperature (121 °C/250 °F) as
gravity displacement sterilizers. However, a special type of vacuum sterilizer, called a high- speed
vacuum sterilizer is operated at a higher temperature (134 °C/275 °F). The vacuum system notonly
shortens the cycle time, but also reduces the chance of creation of air pockets. Because a prevacuum
sterilizer is more complex to operate, it is necessary to monitor its functioning closely and maintain
it on regular basis.
Flash Sterilizers
These are small tabletop prevacuum sterilizers, usually located in operating rooms or adjacent to
them. They operate at a higher temperature (134 °C/275 °F) and thus have a shorter cycle time.
Due to their small size, their use is normally limited to the sterilization of unwrapped surgical
instruments for emergency purposes (e.g., dropped instruments).
Most healthcare facilities often use gravity displacement sterilizers. In most countries, high-speed
vacuum and flash sterilizers are usually found only in large referral hospitals (Webb 1986).
Operation
Instructions for operating the steam sterilizers (autoclaves) and their routine maintenance should be
included in the basic training of healthcare staff. A steam sterilizer will reliably sterilize items only
when kept in good working condition and operated correctly. Sterilization by steam requires four
conditions: adequate contact, sufficient temperature, proper time, and sufficient moisture. Even if
these conditions are all necessary for sterilization to take place, sterilization failures in clinics and
hospitals are most often caused by the lack of steam contact or failure to attain the adequate
temperature (Webb 1986).
Contact
The most frequent reason for sterilization failure is the lack of contact between the steam and the
microorganisms. This failure may be related to human error or mechanical malfunction. Frequent
causes of steam contact failure include:
Failure to clean the object being sterilized adequately.
Instruments that are closed locked or stacked.
Packages wrapped too tightly.
Packs that are overstuffed.
Wrong position of the container
Clogged strainer
Other mechanical problems
Temperature
The next most important factor in steam sterilization is temperature. The most commonly used
temperature for steam sterilization is 121 °C (250 °F). When an object at room temperature is placed
in a sterilizer, the steam transmits thermal energy to the object until the object reaches the same
temperature as the steam. Under normal circumstances, this equilibrium occurs in a few minutes.If
the steam is unsaturated (too dry) or if the steam is prevented from reaching all parts of the object,the
temperature may never reach the level required for sterilization. The only way to be certain that the
sterilizer is working correctly is to make sure that the temperature at all points inside the load has
reached the full operating temperature of 121 °C (250 °F).
Timing
Just as it takes a certain amount of time to cook food, sterilization/killing microorganisms does need
time to do the work. In both cases, the hotter the temperature, the less time is required. Sterilization
time is measured in D-values. A D-value is the amount of time required to kill 90% of the
microorganisms present. Different microorganisms are killed in different scales/measures of time.
In other words, each kind of microorganism has a different set of D-values corresponding with certain
measure/level of temperature.
Moisture
Last, but surely not least, is the moisture requirement. Adequate moisture content of the sterilizer
atmosphere is mandatory for effective sterilization by steam.
Adequate moisture content implies that the steam must be “saturated,” having a relative humidity of
100%. When any cool object is placed in the sterilizer, the steam at the surface of the object cools
and becomes supersaturated. Water begins to condense on the surface of the object. This
condensation produces two immediate effects:
The volume of gas in the sterilizer chamber decreases as the steam (water vapor) changes
to liquid state and more steam is drawn into the chamber and, hence, comes into
increased contact with the articles being sterilized.
A very large amount of thermal energy is transferred to the object, raising the
temperature of the article significantly. The amount of heat released is best explained
by comparing the calories required to change the temperature of steam against the
calories absorbed when water is converted to water vapor (steam).
If the steam is not saturated (less than 100% relative humidity), two problems will soon develop that
individually or together interfere with the adequacy of the sterilization process:
Articles in the sterilizer will remain dry and the microorganisms present cannot be killed
as readily as under wet conditions. (Water vapor softens the capsules of microorganisms
making them more vulnerable to destruction by heat.)
Articles in the sterilizer will remain “cool” much longer, especially if they are wrapped.
Again, using the home kitchen as an example, if a kettle of beans is placed in an oven
(dry heat), it may take hours for them to cook. On the other hand, if they are placed in a
pressure cooker (saturated steam), they will cook much more quickly. Saturated steam is
a much better “carrier” of thermal energy than dry air.
In summary, saturation of the steam is vital to sterilizer operation because water vapor is the best
carrier of thermal energy, which at times makes the microorganisms more vulnerable to destruction
by heat (Webb 1986).
It is only when all these procedures are strictly undertaken that items would certainly be sterilized.
Routine Maintenance
Although there are many brands of steam sterilizers, routine maintenance practices are generally the
same regardless of the make or type. For routine maintenance:
The outlet screen (or pin-trap) should be removed daily and cleaned using a mild soap
and brush under running water.
The chamber should be cleaned daily using a soft cloth, or for large sterilizers, a long-
handled mop that is used only for this purpose. Do not use abrasives or steel wool
because they may scratch the stainless steel surface and increase the occurrence of
corrosion.
All door gaskets should be cleaned daily with a lint-free cloth and checked for defects.
Defective rubber gaskets should be replaced.
The carriage (loading cart used to hold the packs placed in a sterilizer) should be cleaned
daily using a mild soap and lint-free cloth. (The wheels of the loading cart should also be
cleaned at this time, removing any string or other debris.)
The exhaust line (or chamber drain) should be flushed weekly. This will keep the drain
free of substances that might hinder air or steam removal from the chamber. Before
flushing the exhaust line, check the maintenance instructions because trisodium
phosphate solution (a special type of soap) is often recommended (Department of
Health, Education and Welfare 1975; Webb 1986).
This solution can be prepared by adding one ounce of t risodium phosphate to one liter (one
quart) of hot water. If this chemical is not available, the exhaust line can be flushed with hot water
containing a mild soap solution. To do this, one should first remove the screen. Then pour one liter
(one quart) of the solution down the drain using a funnel. Complete the process by pouring a liter of
hot water to rinse out the soap and replace the screen. Usually, high-pressure steam sterilizers
(autoclaves) also have specific instructions on their operation and routine maintenance. Managers
should make copies of these instructions to make available to service staff. If replacement copies are
needed, they can be obtained by writing to the individual manufacturer (normally the address can be
found on the autoclave) or the donor agency providing with the equipment.
Note: To aid the prevention of dulling of the sharp points and cutting edges, wrap the sharp edges and needle
points in gauze before sterilizing. Repair (sharpen) or replace instruments, as needed.
Objectives
To load items into the autoclave in such a way that it allows passage of the most steam
through the load.
To unload the steam autoclave so as to maintain the sterility of the items processed
through a sterilizing cycle.
General Principles
The total weight of an individual pack should not exceed 11 kg (24 pounds).
When loading, leave sufficient space for steam to circulate freely and avoid overloading.
Always leave three inches between the top-most pack and the top of the chamber. Items
should not touch the chamber wall. Never overload the sterilization chamber.
Do not place packages on the floor of the chamber.
Place all packs (linen, gloves, etc.) on edge and place canisters, utensils, and treatment
trays on their sides.
Place instrument sets in trays having mesh or perforated bottoms flat on the shelves.
In combination loads of cloth (or paper) packs and instruments trays, place linens on top
shelves and trays on lower shelves. This prevents any condensation (moisture), which
forms on cool metal when steam initially contacts with the item from dripping onto linen
packs (Department of Health, Education and Welfare 1975).
Load packages containing similar types of items in one load, when possible. For example,
all textile packs should be sterilized in one cycle.
Surgical gloves should be sterilized by themselves or placed on the top shelves.
Nested packs should be positioned in the same direction to help prevent air pockets so
that the condensation can drain and the steam can circulate freely. Shelves (metal wire) or
a loading cart must be used to ensure proper loading. It is preferable to use the cart that
comes with the sterilizer (figure 7.5).
Note: If an item goes in wet, it will come out wet. All items (instruments, basins, and glassware) must be dry
before being loaded into the sterilizer. This helps prevent “wet packs.” The sterilizer is capable of drying items
that have become moist during a properly loaded and operated sterilization process, but it still cannot remove
excess moisture.
Solid containers should be placed on their sides to allow airflow out of them. If air is
trapped in a solid container, it will prevent the steam from contacting the inner surface and
prevent sterilization.
Linens
Linen packs should not be too large and heavy (not more than 5 kg or 12 lbs.) to secure
better steam penetration of the pack in 30 minutes (the time allowed for sterilizing
wrapped items).
Packs containing sheets, table covers, and towels are most impenetrable, and it is difficult
for the steam to reach each fiber. Such packs must be placed on the edge of the shelf to
insure better steam penetration.
Figure 7.5. Loading the steam sterilizer
Liquids
Sterilize liquid and solution bottles separately from all other items.
Liquids must be sterilized by themselves. The amount of liquid in the bottle, not the
size of the container, determines the time required for sterilization.
Use only borosilicate heat-resistant glass (Pyrex®).
Combination Loads
In loads that combine linens (fabrics) and metal items, place linens on top shelves and
metal items below. This prevents condensation from dripping onto the linen packs,
causing them to absorb the excess moisture.
When a load is made up of wrapped and unwrapped items requiring different times to
ensure sterilization, the longest required time (i.e., 30 minutes) must be used.
The fundamental rule in loading the sterilizer is to prepare all items and arrange the load
in such a manner as to encounter the least possible resistance to the passage of steam
through the load (i.e., from the top of the chamber toward the bottom).
Unloading Tips
Open the sterilizer door slightly 12‒14 cm (5‒6 inches) at the end of the cycle (when the
chamber gauge reaches “0”) and allow items to remain inside to reduce the potential for
condensation (formation of water drops on the packages).
Allow instrument packs to dry completely before removal (usually takes 30 minutes).
Cooling time could be as long as two hours, based on room temperature and humidity.
Do not handle the packs during the cooling time.
Place sterile trays and packs on surfaces padded with paper or fabric (avoid placing warm
packs on cold metal surfaces so as to prevent condensation).
Store when packs reach room temperature (usually takes about one hour).
Sterilized packs and articles should be handled gently and used as reasonably as possible.
Return any pack that drops on the floor for reprocessing (remove items from the package
and repackage before reprocessing).
(Acosta-Gnass, Stempliuk 2009; Tietjen, Bossemeyer, McIntosh 2003)
If a pack is dropped, turns out to be moist, or comes into contact with moisture, it must be
considered contaminated.
Instructions
All liquids should be in heat-resistant glass (Pyrex) closed with automatic self-sealing caps.
Load steam sterilizer with liquids only.
Wait until the thermometer indicator shows 121 °C (250 °F) and 106 kPa (15lbs/in2).
Time the sterilization using a clock. The amount (volume) of solution in the bottle
determines the sterilization time, not the size of the bottle:
75 to 200 ml 20 minutes
200 to 500 ml 25 minutes
500 to 1000 ml 30 minutes
1000 to 1500 ml 35 minutes
1500 to 2000 ml 40 minutes
Note: If bottles of solutions with different volumes are sterilized in the same load, use the sterilization
time recommended for the bottle containing the largest volume of liquid.
When the sterilization cycle has ended, release the pressure slowly, taking not less than
15 minutes, until the chamber pressure is at “0.” Turn the operating valve off and open
the door only 1 cm (½ inch). (Suddenly opening the door all the way after a sterilization
cycle could cause liquids to boil over or bottles to burst.) Wait an additional 30 minutes
for the chamber to cool before removing the load.
STEP 9 After sterilizing, items wrapped in cloth or papers are considered sterile as long as the pack
remains clean, dry (including no water stains), and intact. Unwrapped items must be used
immediately or stored in covered sterile containers.
Maintain a steam sterilizer log including heat begun, correct temperature, and
pressure achieved, heat turned down, and heat turned off.
Each load should be monitored with mechanical (time, temperature, and
pressure) and chemical (internal and external chemical test strips) indicators.
Autoclave should be tested daily with an air-removal test to ensure the
proper removal of air.
If steam escapes from the safety valve or under the lid, the autoclave is not
working correctly. Rather, it is merely steaming items at low-pressure (which
may be equivalent to HLD, not sterilization).
If steam escapes from the safety valve instead of the pressure valve, the
pressure valve must be cleaned and inspected.
If steam escapes from under the lid, the gasket (rubber ring) must be cleaned and
dried or replaced.
Wrap clean instruments or other objects, as described earlier in this chapter. Instruments
should not be held tightly together by rubber bands or by any other means that will
prevent steam contact with all surfaces. (See the Packaging Medical Devices and Surgical
Instruments for Steam Sterilization section in this chapter.)
Arrange packs loosely in the chamber to allow for the free circulation and penetration of
steam to all surfaces. Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for load size.
Bring water to a boil until steam escapes from the pressure valve; turn down the heat but
keep steam coming out of the pressure valve. Do not allow the sterilizer to boil dry.
Steam should always be escaping from the pressure valve.
Sterilize for 30 minutes for wrapped objects, 20 minutes for unwrapped objects. Time
with a clock. Start timing only after the temperature and pressure have reached the
required parameters.
After the appropriate time, turn off the heat and wait about 30 minutes (or until the
pressure gauge reads zero) to permit the sterilizer to cool sufficiently before opening the
lid to allow steam to escape.
Allow instrument packs to dry completely before removal; this may take an additional 30
minutes.
Damp packs act like a wick, drawing in microorganisms from the environment. Wrapped
instrument packs are considered unacceptable if there are water droplets or visible
moisture on the outside of the package when removed from the sterilizer chamber.
To prevent contamination by condensation, place sterile trays and packs on a surface
padded with paper or fabric after removing them from the chamber. (Do not store trays or
packs in a plastic dust cover until they reach room temperature; this usually takes about
one hour.)
Note:
Just as with steam sterilization, thorough cleaning of the object before dry heat sterilization is critical. If an
instrument is not properly cleaned, effective sterilization cannot be ensured regardless of how long the
instrument is heated.
Advantages
An effective method as dry heat reaches all surfaces of instruments by conduction, even
for instruments that cannot be disassembled.
Protective of sharps or instruments with a cutting edge (fewer problems with dulling of
cutting edges).
Leaves no chemical residue.
Eliminates “wet pack” problems in humid climates.
Limitations
Plastic and rubber items cannot be dry heat sterilized because temperatures used (160 to
170 °C) are too high for these materials.
Dry heat penetrates materials slowly and unevenly.
Requires oven and continuous source of electricity
STEP 2 If desired, wrap instruments in aluminum foil or place in a metal container with a tight-
fitting closed lid. Wrapping helps prevent recontamination before use. Hypodermic or
suture needles should be placed in glass tubes with cotton stoppers.
STEP 3 Place loose (unwrapped) instruments in metal containers or on trays in the oven and heat
them to the desired temperature.
STEP 4 After the desired temperature is reached, begin timing. The following temperature/time
ratios are recommended (APIC 2002):
170 °C (340 °F) 60 minutes
160 °C (320 °F) 120 minutes
150 °C (300 °F) 150 minutes
140 °C (285 °F) 180 minutes
121 °C (250 °F) overnight
Note: Use dry heat only for items that can withstand a temperature of 170 °C (340 °F) (Perkins 1983).
Needles and other instruments with cutting edges should be sterilized at lower temperatures (160 °C [320
°F]) because higher temperatures can destroy the sharpness of cutting edges (Perkins 1983).
Depending on the temperature selected, the total cycle time (preheating, sterilization
time, and cool down) will range from about 2.5 hours at 170 °C to more than 8 hours at
121 °C.
STEP 5 After cooling, remove packs and/or metal containers and store.
Loose items should be removed with sterile forceps/pickups and used immediately or
placed in a sterile container with a tight-fitting lid until the time of use.
Dry heat:
Heat treatment in 170 °C (340 °F) for an hour (total cycle time—placing instruments in
the oven for one hour, and then cooling for 2 to 2.5 hours), or
Heat treatment in 160 °C (320 °F) for 2 hours (total cycle time is from 3 to 3.5 hours).
Preventing Errors
Sterilization equipment should be calibrated and processes should be validated.
The coldest point should have a minimum temperature of 170 °C (338 °F) for sterilization
to be effective.
Instruments should be wrapped in materials that can withstand high temperatures
(aluminum foils, stainless steel containers, peel pouches).
Do not stack the packages tightly; leave enough room between surfaces.
Carry out chemical and biological controls on a regular basis as per the manufacturer’s
instructions.
Chemical Sterilization
Chemical sterilization is an alternative to high-pressure steam or dry heat sterilization; it is often
called “cold sterilization.” If objects need to be sterilized, and when the available methods such as
high-pressure steam or dry-heat sterilization would damage them or equipment are not available (or
operational), they can be chemically sterilized.
Many chemicals, both in liquid and gas form, are available for processing instruments. Chemicals that
are approved as sterilants can also be used as HLDs, but those approved only for HLD cannot be used
as sterilants. Formaldehyde is no longer included as a sterilant or a HLD due to its toxicity (table 7.3).
Table 7.3. Liquid chemicals used for sterilization
Chemical Sterilan Soak time for HLD Soak time for Effectiv
t sterilization ? HLD e life
Glutaraldehyde Yes 10 hrs at 20–25 °C Yes 20–90 min at 20– 14 days
2%–4% (68–77 °F) 25 °C (68–77 °F)
or
7 hrs, 40 min at 35
°C (95 °F)
Glutaraldehyde Yes 8 hrs at 20 °C (68 Yes 10 min at 20 °C (68 14 days
3.4% and °F) °F)
isopropanol 20.1%
Hydrogen peroxide Yes 6 hrs at 20 °C (68 Yes 30 min at 20 °C (68 21 days
7.5% °F) °F)
Peracetic acid Yes 2 hrs at 20 °C (68 Yes 5 min at 25 °C (77 5 days
0.31%–0.38% °F) °F)
Hydrogen peroxide Yes 5 hrs at 25 °C (77 Yes 5 min at 25 °C (77 5 days
8.3% and paracetic °F) °F)
acid 7%
Hydrogen peroxide Yes 8 hrs at 20 °C (68 Yes 25 min at 20 °C (68 14 days
1.0% and paracetic °F) °F)
acid 0.08%
Adapted from: FDA 2015; Rutala, Weber, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee 2008
Biological Indicators
Monitoring the sterilization process with reliable biological indicators at regular intervals is strongly
recommended. Measurements should be performed with a biological indicator that employs spores
of established resistance in a known population. The biological indicator types and minimum
recommended intervals should be:
Steam Sterilizers: A highly resistant but relatively harmless (nonpathogenic)
microorganism called Geobacillus stearothermophilus is used to test steam sterilizers. As
used in hospitals and clinics to test sterilizers, this microorganism has a D-value of about
two minutes at 121 °C (250 °F). In other words, it would take two minutes at 121 °C (250
°F) to kill 90% of the test microorganisms present. Through research, mathematical
calculation and intelligent “guesses,” authorities have generally agreed that for normal
hospital sterilization, about six Geobacillus stearothermophilus D-values (or about 12
minutes) should be sufficient to kill essentially all pathogenic microorganisms and give a
large margin of safety. For reasons of the absence of internal temperature sensing devices,
such as temperature-specific chemical indicators in many countries, extra time is
recommended as an added safety margin. Therefore, twenty minutes for unwrapped and
30 minutes for wrapped packs are considered sufficient to kill most microorganisms. This
biological indicator should be done weekly, and as deemed necessary.
Dry-Heat Sterilizers: Bacillus subtilis is used as an indicator on a weekly basis, and
as deemed necessary. Similar to Geobacillus stearothermophilus, the recommended time
and temperature are found to be effective in the sterilization of the instruments.
Chemical Indicators
Chemical indicators include indicator tape or labels that monitor time, temperature, and pressure for
steam sterilization and for dry heat sterilization. These indicators should be used on the inside and
outside of each package or container.
External i ndicators are used to verify whether the items have been exposed to the
correct conditions of the sterilization process and the specific pack has been sterilized.
Internal indicators are placed inside a pack or container in the area most difficult for the
sterilization agent to reach (i.e., the middle of a linen pack). This is the indicator thattells
whether the item has been sterilized.
Chemical indicators, such as heat sensitive tape or glass vials containing pellets that melt at certain
temperatures and duration, do not imply achieved/successful sterilization. However, they do indicate
whether mechanical or procedural problems have occurred in the sterilization process.
Mechanical Indicators
Mechanical indicators for sterilizers provide a visible record of the time, temperature, and pressure
for the sterilization cycle. This is usually a printout or graph from the sterilizer or it can be a log of
time, temperature, and pressure kept by the person responsible for the sterilization process that day.
Storage
All sterile items should be stored appropriately to protect them from dust, dirt, moisture, animals,
and insects. The storage area should be located next to the place of sterilization or connected to it in
a separately enclosed area with limited access that is used just to store sterile and clean patient care
supplies. In smaller clinics, this area may be just a room close to the Central Supplies Department or
in the operating room.
Shelf Life
The shelf life of an item (how long items can be considered sterile) after sterilization is
event-related. An item remains sterile until something causes the package or container to
become contaminated as time goes on since sterilization is not the determining factor.
To make sure that items remain sterile until you need them, prevent events that can
contaminate sterile packs and protect them by placing them in plastic covers (thick
polyethylene bags). An event can be a tear or worn-out area in the wrapping, the package
becoming wet or anything else that will enable a microorganism to enter the package or
container.
Before using any sterile item, look at the package to make sure that the wrapping is intact
and the seal is unbroken, clean, and dry (and having no water stains).
If the quality of the wrapping clothes is poor and plastic bags are not available,
limiting the shelf life is a reasonable option to resort to and to secure the sterility of the
instruments.
Note: To make sure that items remain sterile until you need them, prevent events that can contaminate sterile
packs, and protect them by placing them in plastic covers (bags).
In some healthcare facilities, where replacement of supplies is limited and the cloth used for wrapping
is of poor quality, time as a limiting factor also serves as a safety margin. If plastic covers (bags)
are unavailable for the sterilized items, limiting the shelf life to a specific length of time (e.g.,one
month) may be a reasonable decision as long as the pack remains dry and intact.
Theoretically, an intense UV light can be both bactericidal and veridical; however, practically, it was
found that only limited disinfection of instruments can be achieved. For surfaces that cannot be
reached by the UV rays (e.g., inside the barrel of a needle or laparoscope), any microorganisms
present will not be killed (Morris 1972). For these and other issues, UV radiation is neither practical
nor effective method in most situations (Riley, Nardell 1989).
SUMMARY
Applying Spaulding’s classification of non-critical, semi-critical, or critical items determines the
method that should be used to process instruments. Cleaning is the most important step in instrument
processing because it makes instruments safer for additional processing, prevents bioburden from
drying on instruments, and ensures that there are no residual bioburden or cleaning chemicals on the
instruments that may interfere with the subsequent HLD or sterilization process. Policies should be
in place and all HCWs who perform instrument cleaning throughout the facility should be trained
and competent in the appropriate way to clean surgical instruments and other equipment. All semi-
critical instruments and devices that come into contact with mucous membranes and non-intact skin
should be, at a minimum, high-level disinfected. HLD can be carried out by soaking in a high-level
disinfectant, steaming, or by boiling. Sterilization of medical devices and surgical instruments plays
a vital role in reducing surgical site infections and infection as a result of other invasive procedures.
Monitoring the quality of the sterilization process and appropriately following recommendations will
assist healthcare facilities to optimize the safety of sterile medical devices and surgical instruments
used for patient care.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 7: DECONTAMINATION AND REPROCESSING OF MEDICAL DEVICES (INSTRUMENT
PROCESSING)
Abdala, N. Stephens, PC, Griffith, BP, et al. 1999. Survival of HIV-1 in syringes. Journal of Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 20(1):73‒80.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9928733/.
American Society for Hospital Central Service Professionals (ASHCSP) of the American Hospital
Association. 2006. Training manual for health care central service technicians. Enman C (ed). Chicago:
ASHCSP.
Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC). 2002. APIC text of infection control and
epidemiology on CD-ROM. Washington DC: APIC.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2008. Guidelines for disinfection and sterilization in
healthcare facilities. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines-H.pdf.
Favero, MS. 1985. Sterilization, disinfection, and antisepsis in the hospital. In Manual of clinical
th
microbiology, 4 ed. Lennette, EH, et al (eds). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
Fraise, A. P., Maillard, J., & Sattar, S. 2013. Russell, Hugo & Ayliffe's principles and practice of
disinfection, preservation and sterilization (5th ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
https://librarycatalog.isparta.edu.tr/vufind/Record/ocn825550689/Details
Gruendemann, BJ, Mangum, SS. 2001. Ultraviolet irradiation and lights. In Infection prevention in surgical
settings. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company.
Nyström, B. 1981. Disinfection of surgical instruments. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2(4): 363‒368.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6175693/.
Porter, CW. (1987). Prevention of infection in voluntary surgical contraception. Biomedical bulletin, 6(1),1–
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12341653/
Rutala, WA, Gergen, MF, Jones, JF, et al. 1998. Levels of microbial contamination on surgical
instruments. American Journal of Infection Control, 26(2):143‒145.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9584809/.
Rutala, WA. 1996. APIC guidelines for selection and use of disinfectants. 1994, 1995, and 1996 APIC
Guidelines Committee. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. American
Journal of Infect Control, 24(4):313‒342. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8870916/.
Rutala, WA, Cole, EC, Thomann, CA, et al. 1998. Stability & bactericidal activity of chlorine solutions.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 19(5):323‒327. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9613692/.
Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Committee. 2008. Guideline for
disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008, updated 2019.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines-H.pdf.
Shapshak, P, McCoy, CB, Rivers, JE, et al. 1993. Inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus-1 at
short time intervals using undiluted bleach. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 6(2): 218-
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8433288/.
Spaulding, E.H. 1968. Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In Disinfection, sterilization
and preservation. Lawrence, CA et al., (eds). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
Tietjen, LG, McIntosh, N. 1989. Infection prevention in family planning facilities. Outlook, 7: 2‒8.
Tietjen, L, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities
with limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego Corporation. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. 2001. Lessons from outbreaks associated with bronchoscopy. Infection
Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 22(7): 403‒408. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11583206/.
Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. 1993. Environmental issues and nosocomial infections. In Prevention and control
of nosocomial infection, 2nd ed. Wenzel (ed). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
World Health Organization (WHO). 1989. Guidelines on sterilization and disinfection methods effective
against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 2nd edition. Geneva: WHO.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41538.
Additional references
Acosta-Gnass, SI and Stempliuk, V de A. 2009. Sterilization manual for health centers. Washington, DC:
Pan American Health Organization.
Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). 1990. Good hospital practice:
Guidelines and use reusable grid sterilization container system. Washington, DC: AAMI.
Block SS. 1991. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Caston-Gaa A and Ruparelia CS. 2018. Infection prevention and control for healthcare facilities with
limited resource. Chapter 6: Processing surgical instruments and medical devices. Baltimore, MD:
Jhpiego Corporation.
Department of Health, Education and Welfare (DHEW). 1975. A manual for hospital central services.
Hyattsville, MD: DHEW.
FDA. 2015. FDA-cleared sterilant and high-level disinfectants with general claims for processing reusable
medical and dental devices. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/reprocessing-reusable-medical-devices-
information-manufacturers/fda-cleared-sterilants-and-high-level-disinfectants-general-claims-processing-
reusable-medical-and
Greenslade FC, Leonard AH, Benson J, Winkler J, and Henderson VL. 1993. Manual vacuum aspiration:
A summary of clinical and programmatic experience worldwide. Carrboro, NC: IPAS.
Holman RC, et al. 1996. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States, 1979–1994: Using national
mortality data to access the possible occurrence of variant cases. Emerg Infect Dis, 2(4): 333-33.
McIntosh N, et al. 1994. Practical methods for high-level disinfection of surgical gloves. Paper presented at
American Public Health Association Annual Meeting. Session no. 2285, Washington, D.C., 31 October–4
November.
Morris EJ. 1972. The practical use of ultraviolet radiation for disinfection purposes. Med Lab Technol, 29(1):
41–47.
Perkins JJ. 1983. Principles and methods of sterilization in health sciences. 2d ed. Springfield, IL: Charles
C. Thomas, pp. 388-402.
Riley RL and EA Nardell. 1989. Clearing the air, the theory and application of ultraviolet air disinfection.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 139(5): 1286–1294.
Rutala WA. 1993. Disinfection, sterilization and waste disposal, in Prevention and Control of Nosocomial
Infections, 2nd ed. Wenzel RP (ed). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, pp 460–495.
Spaulding EH. 1939. Studies on chemical sterilization of surgical instruments. Surg Gyne Obstet, 69: 738–
744.
Steelman V. 1992. Ethylene oxide: the importance of aeration. AORN Journal, 55(3): 773–787.
Taylor LA, MS Barbeito, and GG Gremillion. 1969. Paraformaldehyde for surface sterilization and
detoxification. Applied Microbiol, 17(4): 614–618.
Tietjen LG, Cronin W, McIntosh N. 1992. Autoclaves, In Infection prevention guidelines for family planning
programs. Durant, OK: Essential Medical Information Systems, Inc., pp 208-229.
Tietjen LG, Cronin W, and McIntosh N. 1992. High-level disinfection, In Infection prevention guidelines for
family planning programs. Durant, OK: Essential Medical Information Systems, Inc., pp 74–84.
Tulis JJ. 1973. Formaldehyde gas as a sterilant, in Industrial Sterilization: International Symposium. Briggs
Phillips G and WS Miller (eds). Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp 209–238.
Webb SB (ed). 1986. Central service technical manual, 3rd ed. Chicago: International Association of
Hospital Central Service Management (IAHCSM).
WHO and PAHO. 2016. Decontamination and reprocessing of medical devices for health-care facilities.
Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization (WHO). 1989. Guidelines on sterilization and high-level disinfection methods
effective against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Geneva: WHO.
Zuhlsdorf B, Floss H, Martiny H. 2004. Efficacy of 10 different cleaning processes in a washer disinfector
for flexible endoscopes. J Hosp Infect, 56:305–311.
Key Topics
Minimum requirements for standard laundry
Periodic monitoring and routine maintenance issues
Key steps in processing textiles
The use of PPE
Collecting, transporting, and sorting used textiles
Washing and drying (laundering) used textiles
Storing, transporting, and distributing hygienically clean textiles
BACKGROUND
Although soiled textiles may contain large numbers of microorganisms, there is little risk to health
workers during textile processing. If work-related infections occur, it often happens because HCWs
are not using gloves or other PPE, or are not washing their hands during or after collecting,
transporting, and sorting soiled items. Therefore, no special precautions are necessary, regardless
of a patient’s diagnosis, if standard precautions are taken in all situations.
Periodic Monitoring
Monitoring/inspection of the laundry unit on a weekly basis (cleanness, functionality,
availability of all necessary detergent, PPE, and water, and all activities, including
collection, storage, and recording/information [to assess work efficiency] of the unit).
Facility should develop a monitoring checklist that includes the above requirements.
Include the laundry activity in weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly plans and
report accordingly.
Note: If utility gloves are not available, putting on two pairs of examination or reprocessed surgical gloves
(double gloving) provide some protection for staff responsible for collecting, transporting, and sorting soiled
textiles and other items.
Processing Textiles
Processing textiles consists of all steps required to collect, transport, and sort soiled textilesand
to launder (wash, dry, and fold or pack), store, and distribute them. Safely processing textiles from
multiple sources is a complex process. To reduce the risk of contamination, procedures shouldbe in
place to safely handle, process, and store textiles.
Staff handling the textiles should be properly trained on the processing procedures and should
protect themselves by applying standard precautions while collecting, transporting, and sorting
soiled textiles. They should wear thick utility or heavy-duty household gloves to minimize the risk
of accidental injury from a needle stick or other sharp object, including broken glass. Staff
responsible for washing soiled items should wear utility gloves, protective eyewear, and plastic or
rubber aprons and rubber boots.
Table 8.1. Recommended PPE for processing textiles
Activity Type of PPE
Collecting
Collect and remove soiled textiles from patient rooms after each procedure daily, or as
needed.
Use standard precautions, including PPE (see above), when collecting used textiles.
Do not sort textiles in patient care areas.
Collect used textiles at the point of use. Use leak-proof containers for all textiles; cloth
bags are adequate for patient care textiles not soaked with blood or body fluids.
Roll items that are heavily contaminated with blood or body fluids carefully into the
center of the item and place in a leak-proof bag or a container with a lid if leak-proof
bags are not available.
Do not sort or rinse textiles heavily contaminated with blood and body fluids in patient
care areas.
Label clearly or use color coded containers for collecting and transporting used textiles.
Wash and dry containers routinely before subsequent use. (See the Environmental
Cleaning chapter in this volume for guidance on disinfectants.)
Note: If utility gloves are not available, put on two pairs of non-sterile gloves (double gloving). This provides
some protection for HCWs responsible for collecting, transporting, and sorting soiled textiles and other
items.
Handling
Handle soiled textiles as little as possible. To avoid the spread of microorganisms in the
environment and among HCWs and patients, do not shake soiled textiles.
It is not necessary to routinely double bag or use additional precautions for textiles used
by patients in isolation. Two bags may be indicated if the textile cannot be placed in the
bag without contaminating the outside of the bag.
Transporting
Transport collected soiled textiles to the processing area in closed bags, containers with
lids, or covered carts.
Transport soiled textiles and clean textiles separately. If there are separate carts, trolleys,
or containers available for soiled and clean textiles, they should be labeled accordingly.
If soiled and clean textiles are transported in the same cart or container:
o Clean the containers and trolleys or carts thoroughly after transporting soiled textiles
using disinfectant cleaning solution. (For detailed information, see Volume 1,
Chapter 9: Environmental Cleaning.)
o Keep soiled textiles in separate areas of the same cart from where clean textiles are
located and cover both.
Duration of cleaning
Mechanical action (i.e., agitation)
Chemicals used in the process
Temperature of water and air in the dryer machine
If one of these factors is decreased (e.g., temperature), then other factors (e.g., chemicals,
mechanical action, or time) must be increased to result in the same level of cleanliness.
Laundering cycles consist of flush, main wash, disinfecting (bleaching), rinsing, and souring
(addition of a mild acid agent).
Decontamination of textiles by presoaking with soap, water, and chlorine solution before washing
is not necessary unless the item is heavily soiled or will be hand washed. Repeated soaking of
textiles in chlorine solution, even dilute solution, can cause the fabric to deteriorate more quickly.
Note: The storage time for soiled textiles before washing is a practical issue related to available storage
space and aesthetics, not an IP concern.
Handwashing Textiles
Please note that: Lower temperature or cold water washing are satisfactory if the cleaning products
(type of soap or detergent, amount of bleach and other additive) are appropriate and used in proper
concentrations. Using cold water also saves energy.
STEP 2 After textiles are totally dry, check for holes and threadbare (worn) areas. If these are
present, the item must be discarded or repaired before reuse or storage.
For holes, punctures, or tears or large areas to be repaired, the item should be patched
with the same quality material by stitching or heat sealing; otherwise, the item should
not be used for direct patient care or surgical procedures. Worn textiles can be cut into
pieces and used as cleaning cloths.
For surgical drapes, the percentage of exposed surface allowed to be patched depends
on the sterilization method used to process the item and the number of layers of fabric
from which the drape is made. For example, a drape should have no more than five
patches per area 30 centimeters (12 inches) square, or no more than 20% of the drape
covered with patches. Patches should be avoided, if possible, because they increase the
thickness of the item and decrease steam penetrability when sterilization is required.
STEP 3 Air-dried textiles should be ironed. Ironing has been associated with the elimination of
pathogenic bacteria and is essential to prevent parasites in some regions.
STEP 4 Clean, dry textiles should be folded. If sterile textiles are required (e.g., in the operating
theater), prepare and sterilize wrapped packs. In neonatal ICUs, hygienically laundered
textiles can be safely used; it is not necessary to use sterilized textiles (AORN 2012;
Bearman, Bryant, Leekha, et al. 2014; Sehulster, Chinn, Arduino, et al. 2015;
SEARO/WHO 2004; Tietjen, Bossemeyer, McIntosh 2003).
Key Notes:
Do not presort or wash textiles at the point of use.
Workers should not carry wet and soiled textiles close to their bodies even though they
are wearing a plastic or rubber apron.
Presoaking in soap, water, and bleach is necessary only for heavily soiled textiles.
Ironing, especially using a steam iron, will destroy pathogens.
Handle stored textiles as little as possible.
Sterilization is the preferred end process for surgical gowns, textile drapes, and
wrappers.
SUMMARY
Facility staff are often responsible for handling and processing reusable textiles at the facility.
Although soiled textiles may contain large numbers of microorganisms, the overall risk of disease
transmission is low if textiles are handled, transported, and laundered in a manner that avoids the
transfer of microorganisms to patients, HCWs, and the environment. Healthcare-related outbreaks
can occur because of contaminated textiles and HCWs can experience injuries and exposure if these
recommendations are not followed. Guidelines for processing textiles and PPE are provided in table
8.2.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 8: PROCESSING REUSABLE TEXTILES AND LAUNDRY SERVICES
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). 2014. Laundry, patient linens,
textiles and uniforms (Chapter 111). In APIC text of infection control and epidemiology, 4th ed.
Washington, DC: APIC.
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). 2012. Recommended practices for sterile
technique. In Perioperative standards and recommended practices: For inpatient and ambulatory settings.
Denver, CO: AORN.
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). 1999. Recommended practices for sterilization in
perioperative practice settings. AORN Journal, 70(2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-
2092(06)62242-4
Balm, MN, Jureen, R, Teo, C, et al. 2012. Hot and steamy: Outbreak of Bacillus cereus in Singapore
associated with construction work and laundry practices. The Journal of Hospital Infection, 81(4):224–230.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22704635/.
Bearman, G, Bryant, K. Leekha, S, et al. 2014. Healthcare personnel attire in non-operating-room settings.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(2):107–121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24442071/.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2011. Basic infection control and prevention plan for
outpatient oncology settings. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/settings/outpatient/basic-infection-control-prevention-
plan-2011/index.
Duffy, J, Harris, J, Gade, L, et al. 2014. Mucormycosis outbreak associated with hospital linens. The
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 33(5):472–476. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24667485/.
Fijan, S, Turk, SS. 2012. Hospital textiles, are they a possible vehicle for healthcare-associated infections?
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9):3330–3343.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499872/.
Healthcare Laundry Accreditation Council (HLAC). 2016. Accreditation standards for processing reusable
textiles for use in healthcare facilities.
https://www.hlacnet.org/_files/ugd/076879_f1469c4510464048999c64c1149c6799.pdf.
Hosein, IK, Hoffman, PN, Ellam, S, et al. 2013. Summertime Bacillus cereus colonization of hospital
newborns traced to contaminated, laundered linen. The Journal of Hospital Infection, 85(2):149–154.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23927924/.
McDonald, LL. 2002. Textile services. In APIC text of infection control and epidemiology. Washington DC:
APIC.
Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), United States Department of Labor. n.d. Laundry.
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/hospital/laundry/laundry.html#ContaminatedLaundry.
Sehulster L,M, Chinn, RY, Arduino, MJ, et al. 2004 (Last update: 2015). Environmental infection control
guidelines. Chicago, IL: American Society for Healthcare Engineering/American Hospital Association.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/environmental/background/laundry.html.
South East Asia Regional Office (SEARO), World Health Organization (WHO). 2004. Practical guidelines
for infection control in healthcare facilities. New Delhi, India: SEARO. http://www.mtpinnacle.com/pdfs/who-
practical-guide-infection-cont.pdf.
Tietjen, L, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities with
limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
Key Topics
General principles of cleaning
Ways of preparing disinfectant cleaning solutions
When and how to clean low and high-risk areas
Cleaning spills of blood or other body fluids
Cleaning the housekeeping equipment
BACKGROUND
The accumulation of dust, soil, and microbial contaminants on environmental surfaces is both
unsightly and a potential source of HAIs. Effective and efficient cleaning methods and schedules
are, therefore, necessary to maintain a clean and healthy environment in healthcare settings (Chou
2002).
Housekeeping practices in healthcare facilities address the general cleaning of health facilities,
including the compound, the floors, walls, various types of equipment, tables, and other surfaces.
Housekeeping activities are not expensive or technology intensive in most cases. The purpose of
general housekeeping is to:
Reduce the number of microorganisms that may encounter patients, visitors, staff, and
the community.
Provide a clean and pleasant atmosphere for patients and staff.
Most areas in health facilities, such as waiting rooms and administrative offices, are normally of
low risk because they can be cleaned using only soap and water. In high-risk areas, where heavy
contamination is expected, sources of contaminations, such as toilets and latrines, and blood or body
fluid spills, can be handled by such disinfectants as 0.5% chlorine or 1% phenol, which should be
added to the cleaning solution (SEARO 1988). Using a disinfectant in addition to soap and water is
also recommended in other high-risk areas, such as operating rooms, pre- and postoperative
recovery areas, dressing areas, and ICUs.
Patient rooms, especially those items that might be touched with bare hands by patients and staff,
should be cleaned using a disinfectant solution to minimize the risk of infection. A study in this area
(McFarland, et al. 1989) found that when patients who did not have Clostridium difficile were
admitted to a room previously occupied by a patient with these bacteria, the risk of infection from
the bacteria for these new patients was known to increase many fold, even in the context of the
correct use of precautions to prevent cross contamination.
If the purpose of housekeeping, as stated above, is to be achieved, it is important that housekeeping
staff be trained to perform their assigned tasks and are supervised on a regular basis. As part of their
training, it is important that the housekeeping staff:
Understand the risk of exposure to contaminated items and surfaces when performing
environmental cleaning procedures.
Follow recommended policies and guidelines, including the use of appropriate PPE.
Disinfectants
Disinfectants are only for disinfecting after cleaning and are not substitutes for cleaning unless they
are a combined detergent-disinfectant product. Before disinfecting, use a cleaning product to
remove all organic material and soil. Low-level disinfection is generally adequate for environmental
cleaning procedures, but there are specific cases where intermediate-level disinfection with
sporicidal properties (e.g., C. difficile) is required.
Combined detergent-disinfectants
Combined (one-step) detergent-disinfectant products can generally be used in place of a two-step
(separate detergent and disinfectant product) process when disinfection is indicated for specific
environmental cleaning procedures.
The disinfectant cleaning solutions contain both disinfectants for decontamination and detergents
(soap) for cleaning. When we use chlorine solution, we should be cautious. Although chlorine-
containing solutions (sodium hypochlorite) are excellent and inexpensive disinfectants, they should
not be mixed with cleaning solutions containing an acid (e.g., phosphoric acid) like ammonia or
ammonium chloride. Doing so will release chlorine gas and other by-products that can result in
temporary illness (nausea, tearing, headache, or shortness of breath) of the staff inhaling fumes in
a poorly ventilated area (CDC 1991). To find out if a cleaning solution contains ammonia, first
check the label. If it is not mentioned among the ingredients, you may still be able to detect ammonia
when opening the product by its pungent and burning smell. If one is exposed to chlorinegas or
ammonium chloride or other unpleasant (noxious) gases with strong odors, the subject should
immediately leave the room or the area until it becomes completely ventilated.
STEP 1 Prepare a 0.5% chlorine solution from liquid concentrates or from chlorine powder
compounds (Equation 9.0-1). Alternative disinfectants that can be used are 1% to 2%
phenols or 5% carbolic acid.
STEP 2 Add enough detergent to the 0.5% chlorine solution or another disinfectant to make a mild
and soapy cleaning solution.
Equation 9.0-1. Formula for making a dilute solution from a concentrated solution
% 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠 (𝑇𝑃)𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 = ⌈ ⌉−1
% 𝐷𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
5%
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠 (𝑇𝑃)𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 = ⌈ ⌉−1
0.5 %
=9
STEP 2: Take one-part concentrated solution and add to nine parts of water.
Example: Make a dilute chlorine solution (0.5%) from a concentrated powder (35%)
0.5 %
𝐺𝑚/𝐿𝑖𝑡 = ⌈ ⌉ ∗ 1,000
35 %
= 14.2 𝑔𝑚/𝑙𝑖𝑡
Cleaning Methods
Cleaning should start with the least soiled area and extend to the most soiled area and from high
to low surfaces. Common methods of cleaning are briefly described.
Wet Dusting
Should be used for cleaning walls, ceilings, doors, windows, furniture, and other
environmental surfaces.
Clean clothes or mops are made wet with cleaning solution contained in a basin
or bucket. The double-bucket system minimizes the contamination of the cleaning
solution.
Dry dusting should be avoided, and dust cloths should not be shaken for fear of
spreading microorganisms.
Should be performed in a systematic way using a starting point as a reference to ensure
that all surfaces have been reached.
Check for a stain that may indicate possible leaks when doing high dusting (ceiling
tiles and walls). Leaking holes or cracks should be repaired as soon as possible because
moist structure provides a reservoir for fungal growth.
Dry Vacuuming
This is recommended only for cleaning carpets.
Walls, windows, ceilings, and doors, including door handles: These areas should be cleaned
when visibly dirty with a damp cloth, detergent, and water. In general, routine damp dusting is
adequate for these areas (disinfection is unnecessary). These surfaces are seldom heavily
contaminated with microorganisms as long as the surfaces remain dry and intact (Russell, Hugo,
Ayliffe 1982).
Chairs, lamps, tables, tabletops, beds, handrails, grab bars, lights, tops of doors, and counters:
These items should be wiped daily, and whenever visibly soiled, with a damp cloth containing
disinfectant cleaning solution. A disinfectant should be used when contamination from blood or
other body fluid spills are present.
Non-critical equipment (e.g., stethoscopes and blood pressure cuffs): These items can be wiped
daily, and whenever visibly soiled, with a damp cloth with detergent and water. However, if the
equipment is visibly soiled with blood or other body fluids, or when the patient is under contact
precautions, it should be cleaned and disinfected before it is reused.
Floors are usually cleaned (daily and as needed) with a wet mop, detergent, and water. Adisinfectant
should be used during an actual or potential contamination from such sources asblood or other
body fluid spills, as described below.
Sinks are scrubbed frequently (daily or more often, as needed) with a separate mop, cloth, or brush
using a disinfectant cleaning solution. Following this, it needs to be rinsed with water.
Toilets and latrines are scrubbed frequently (daily and more often, as needed) with a separate mop,
cloth, or brush and a disinfectant cleaning solution.
Patient rooms should be cleaned daily and right after a patient is discharged, using the processes
described above. The same cleaning process applies to rooms of patients who are under isolation
precautions. Any cleaning equipment used in the rooms of patients under isolation precautions
should be cleaned and disinfected before being used in another room.
Procedure rooms: Wipe horizontal surfaces, equipment, and furniture used for procedures with a
disinfectant cleaning solution after each procedure and whenever visibly soiled. Clean blood or
other body fluid spills, as described below.
Examination rooms: Wipe horizontal surfaces with a disinfectant cleaning solution whenever
visibly soiled. Linen or paper on the examination table should be changed and laid out for each
patient. Clean blood or other body fluid spills, as described below.
Laboratory: Wipe countertops with a disinfectant cleaning solution after each shift and whenever
visibly soiled. Clean blood or other body fluid spills, as described below.
Curtains: Change and clean curtains according to the routine schedule and when visibly soiled.
Carpets: Vacuum carpets daily in patient rooms or weekly in offices or conference rooms.
Soiled linen: Collect soiled linen daily (or more often, as needed); put them in closed and leak-
proof containers.
Waste: Collect waste from all areas at least daily (or more frequently, as needed) and avoid
overflowing.
Waste containers: Clean contaminated waste containers each time following emptying. Clean non-
contaminated waste containers when visibly soiled and at least once a week. Use a disinfectant
cleaning solution and scrub to remove soil and organic material.
Note: Do not dry mop or sweep the operating room. (This causes dust, debris, and microorganisms to
become airborne and contaminate clean surfaces.)
Total Cleaning
STEP 1 Remove covered contaminated waste container and replace it with a clean container.
Arrange for burning (incineration) or burial as soon as possible.
STEP 2 Close and remove sharps containers when three-quarters full.
STEP 3 Remove soiled linen in closed leak-proof containers.
STEP 4 Soak a cloth in disinfectant cleaning solution and wipe down all surfaces, including
counters, tabletops, sinks, lights, etc. Wash from top to bottom so that any debris that
falls on the floor will be cleaned up last.
Note: All areas of the surgical suite, scrub sinks, scrub or utility areas, hallways, and equipment should be
totally cleaned regardless of their being used during the 24-hour surgery period.
Walls and ceilings: Wipe them with a damp cloth with detergent and water as needed for visible
soil.
Note: If walls and ceilings are deteriorating or damp, cover them up with clean plastic sheets during
procedures.
Chairs, lamps, sink tabletops, and counters: Wipe them with a damp cloth with disinfectant
cleaning solution.
Operating room lamps: Wipe them with a damp cloth with disinfectant cleaning solution.
Note: The double- or triple-bucket method is recommended for cleaning the operating room and other
areas of the surgical suite.
Operating room table: Wipe it with a 0.5% chlorine solution (or other approved disinfectant) to
decontaminate. Then clean the top, sides, base, legs, and any accessories (e.g., leg stirrups) with a
damp cloth and disinfectant cleaning solution.
Floors: Clean with a wet mop using a disinfectant cleaning solution.
Vents (heating or air conditioning): Wipe them with a damp cloth with soap and water.
Spills: Clean spills with a 0.5% chlorine solution or other locally available and approved
disinfectants (see below).
Operating room bed: Wipe all surfaces and mattress pads with a disinfectant cleaning solution.
Instrument tables (trolley and mayo stand) and other flat surfaces: Wipe all flat surfaces
that have come into immediate contact with a patient or body fluids with a disinfectant cleaning
solution.
Center of operating room surrounding the operating room bed: Mop it with a disinfectant
cleaning solution (if visibly soiled).
Waste: Collect and remove all waste from the operating room in closed leak-proof containers.
Sharps containers: Close and remove containers from the operating room when they are three-
quarters full.
Soiled linen: Remove soiled linen in leak-proof covered waste containers.
Note:
Cleaning the filters in air conditioners regularly will help them run more efficiently and decrease the
growth of molds.
Because all patients are considered potentially susceptible and at times infectious, standard precautions
are to be used and no additional measures are necessary even if a client is known to have an infection.
How to Manage Spills of Mercury from Broken Thermometer and Blood Pressure
Equipment:
Put examination gloves on both hands.
Collect all droplets of mercury with a spoon.
Place in a small, closed container for disposal (possibly encapsulation and burial of the
waste away from water resource area) or reuse.
Wash or clean the area with a chlorine solution.
Remove used gloves carefully and wash hands properly.
SUMMARY
Housekeeping practices in the healthcare facilities include the compound, the floors,
walls, various type of equipment, tables, and other surfaces.
Dust, soil, and microbial contaminants on environmental surfaces are potential source of
HAIs.
Effective and efficient cleaning methods and schedules are necessary to maintain a clean
and healthy environment in healthcare settings.
Cleaning should start with the least soiled area and extend to the most soiled area, and
from high to low surfaces.
It is important that housekeeping staff be trained to perform their assigned tasks and are
supervised on a regular basis.
Total cleaning or terminal cleaning (mopping floors and scrubbing all surfaces from top
to bottom) of the operating room should be done at the end of each day.
Do not dry mop or sweep the operating room.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 9: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING IN HEALTHCARE SETTING
Belkin, NL. 1994. Gowns: selection on a procedure-driven basis. Infection Control and Hospital
Epidemiology, 15(11), 713-716. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7852728/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1991. Chlorine gas toxicity from mixture of bleach with
other cleaning products--California. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 40(36), 619–629.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1953902/
CDC and ICAN. 2019. Best practices for environmental cleaning in healthcare facilities in resource-limited
settings. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; Cape Town, South Africa:
Infection Control Africa Network. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/index.html.
Chou, T. 2002. Environmental services. In: APIC text of infection control and epidemiology. Washington,
DC: APIC.
Curless, MS, Givan, M, & Trexler, PA. 2018. Infection prevention and control. Module 5. Facility
management. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego Corporation. https://www.jhpiego.org/wp-
content/uploads/2020/03/IPC_M5_FacilityManagement.pdf
Fraise, AP, Lambert, PA, & Maillard, JY. (Eds.) 2008. Russell, Hugo and Ayliffe's principles and practice of
disinfection, preservation and sterilization: Fourth Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, Cardo DM. 2007.
Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Reports,
122(2):160-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1820440/
McFarland, LV, Mulligan, ME, Kwok, RY, Stamm, WE. 1989. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile
infection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 320(4), 204–210.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2911306/
Spaulding, EH. 1968. Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In Lawrence, C, Block, SS,
eds. Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
Key Topics
Categories of healthcare waste
Reduction of healthcare waste
Segregation of waste at point of generation
Management of the healthcare waste process
Waste treatment and disposal methods
BACKGROUND
Healthcare waste, produced in the course of delivering healthcare, is potentially hazardous, and
effective management is critical to IPC in healthcare. A healthcare facility is responsible for
managing public health and protecting the environment with regard to the waste produced.
However, the waste management process (generation, collection, transport, storage, and disposal)
entails considerable complexity, involving clinical and non-clinical staff across a facility, and often
depends on outside agencies.
Managing waste remains particularly challenging for facilities in limited-resource settings. Lack of
organization, financial resources, training, segregation, equipment, locations for storage, access to
PPE, municipal support, and safe disposal locations have been identified as among the challenges
(Awodele, Adewoye, Oparah 2016; Caniato, Tudor, Vaccari 2016). WHO (2017), in reporting a
WHO/UNICEF joint assessment, found that just over half (58%) of sampled facilities from 24
countries had adequate systems in place for the safe disposal of health-care waste. Public interest in
waste management practices of healthcare facilities and the impact on climate and the environment
continues to grow. Knowledge of the potential for harm from healthcare waste continues to be
relevant to governments and communities. (WHO 2014).
Risks from healthcare waste include exposure to pathogenic organisms, harmful chemicals, toxins,
or radioactive substances, and injury from sharp items. Anyone who comes into contact with waste,
both in the community and in the facility (HCWs, patients, visitors, laundry workers, cleaners,
porters, etc.) may be at risk. Exposure to toxic agents contained in healthcare waste can cause skin,
respiratory tract, and neurological conditions. Recommendations for reducing the risk from injury
and infection are described in this chapter.
Infectious healthcare waste includes waste that has the potential for causing infection. HCWs can
be infected when they are exposed to waste through a skin puncture, broken skin, splashes into the
mouth or eyes, inhalation, or ingestion. Infectious conditions potentially transmitted from healthcare
waste include gastrointestinal conditions (i.e., diarrhea and vomiting), respiratory conditions, skin
and eye infections, meningitis, bloodborne virus infections (e.g., HIV, HBV, and HCV), and
hemorrhagic fever, including EVD.
Standard precautions protect HCWs from the risks of handling infectious waste at each point
throughout the waste management process. All waste should be handled using Standard Precautions
and Transmission-Based Precautions, and waste that includes any items potentially contaminated
with blood and body fluids should be managed as infectious waste.
Applying IPC recommendations to all aspects of waste handling (generation, collection, transport,
storage, and disposal) minimizes the risks to human health and the environment.
Cytotoxic waste Cytotoxic waste contains by-products of drugs that kill dividing cells, which are
used for treatment of certain cancers. It also includes waste materials that can
damage human genes (e.g., DNA) and may cause cancers or congenital
deformities in babies. This waste can include sharps, PPE, and body fluid
exposed to the drugs.
Note: Training HCWs and having conveniently placed sharps containers close to where sharps are used
will help eliminate problems with improper disposal.
Use the following guidelines when disposing of infectious and general waste at the point of
generation in all types of healthcare facilities:
The HCW who generates the waste should segregate it where it is generated (e.g., before
leaving a patient’s room, examination room, operating theater, or laboratory).
The waste should be separated into the local or WHO categories (based on its potential
hazard and final disposal method).
Separating wastes by hand after generation puts HCWs at risk and should not be
allowed.
Deposit infectious waste in a labeled or color-coded, leak-proof, puncture-resistant
container.
Use leak-proof (plastic or galvanized metal) containers with tight-fitting covers for
contaminated and hazardous wastes to protect patients and HCWs.
Where available and feasible, use sturdy plastic bags/bin liners inside the waste
collection containers to assist with waste collection and transport. Do not reuse plastic
bags or bin liners.
Use puncture-resistant sharps containers for all disposable sharps (e.g., sharps that will
not be reused).
Methods to encourage waste segregation include:
Employ a “three-bin system” to segregate waste into separate bins for general, non-
hazardous wastes, infectious waste, and sharps.
Use standardized, colored plastic bags (if available) or colored waste containers or
standardized, clearly labeled containers to alert HCWs to the contents of the containers.
Place waste containers and sharps containers at or close to the point of waste generation
so that waste and sharps can be placed directly in the container.
Note: The sharps container should be placed at the point of use so that HCWs do not have to carry sharp
items.
Use tools, such as a kidney dish or bowl, to separate waste and transport it safely from
the point of waste generation to waste containers when waste containers and sharps
containers cannot be placed close to the point of waste generation.
Train HCWs on the importance, categories, and methods of waste segregation.
Note: It is important to train all HCWs, including clinicians and cleaning staff, and to educate patients to
keep infectious and non-infectious waste separate.
Use workplace reminders (posters, signs) to remind staff how to segregate waste.
Talk to HCWs in each area of the facility about the barriers to segregation in their
departments because they will vary widely according to the types of tasks performed and the
workflow. WHO’s recommendations for waste segregation are described in table 10.3.
Table 10.3. WHO’s recommendations for waste segregation
Type of waste Color of container and Type of container
markings
Highly infectious waste Yellow, marked “highly Strong, leak-proof plastic bag or
infectious” with biohazard container capable of being
symbol autoclaved
Other infectious waste (includes Yellow with biohazard symbol Leak-proof plastic bag or
all pathological waste) container
Sharps Yellow, marked “SHARPS” with Puncture-proof container
biohazard symbol
Chemical and pharmaceutical Brown, labeled with appropriate Plastic bag or rigid container
waste hazard symbol
Radioactive waste Labeled with radiation symbol Lead box
General healthcare waste Black Plastic bag or container
Source: WHO 2014
After segregation in patient care areas, separation during collection, transport, and storage of waste
must be maintained to obtain any benefit. All HCWs, including cleaners, porters, and those
collecting, transporting, storing, and disposing of the waste, must be educated about the importance
of segregation.
In addition, use symbols to indicate the different categories of infectious and hazardous waste
(figure 10.1).
Figure 10.1. Hazardous waste symbols for healthcare facilities
Note: Waste bags and sharps containers should NOT be filled more than three-quarters full.
Waste collection timetables for each route should be carefully planned according to the
waste generation patterns of the various departments. For example, operating theaters,
labor and delivery areas, laboratories, and outpatient clinics may generate more waste at
different times than other areas and require more frequent collection schedules.
Note:
Never use hands to compress waste into containers.
Hold plastic bags at the top.
Keep bags from touching or brushing against the body while lifting or during transport.
Collect waste on a regular basis, such as daily or sooner, if needed, according to the rate
it is generated and the size of the waste containers. Waste bags and sharps containers
should NOT be filled more than three-quarters full.
Staff should be trained to understand the risks and safety procedures for handling waste:
o Do not mix infectious/hazardous and general waste during collection or transport.
o Collect and transport infectious waste to disposal sites in leak-proof, covered,
contaminated-waste containers.
o Do not use equipment (e.g., wheelbarrow, trolley/cart) that is used to hold and
transport waste for any other purpose in the healthcare facility.
o Use PPE when handling wastes.
Other methods
Encapsulation Filling containers (e.g., high-density polyethylene or metallic drums) with three-
quarters waste and then one-quarter medium substance (e.g., plastic foam,
bituminous sand, cement mortar, or clay material) and sealing container to be
disposed of in landfill site
Inertization Mixing of waste (e.g., pharmaceutical and high-metal content ashes) with
cement and other substances before disposal to reduce the risk of toxic
substances leaching into surface and groundwater
Land disposal Removal of healthcare waste materials after minimization or treatment to land
sites (e.g., controlled landfills) for final disposal
Municipal and other external Landfill or waste site operated in a controlled manner for municipal waste,
disposal sites whether treated or untreated waste, based on municipal guidelines
Adapted from: WHO 2014
The following waste treatment methods are not recommended and should be avoided:
Open piles of waste because they:
o Are a risk to those who scavenge and unknowingly reuse contaminated items.
o Allow people to accidentally step on sharp items and injure themselves.
o Produce foul odors.
o Attract insects and animals.
o Can scatter in the wind and rain.
Open burning because:
o It is dangerous.
o Temperatures reached are not adequate to treat healthcare waste.
o It is unsightly.
o The smoke is a pollutant.
o The wind can scatter the waste.
Specific steps are required for disposing of different categories of waste. Infectious and hazardous
waste should be treated before final disposal. Figure 10.2 shows the acceptable methods of waste
disposal.
Autoclaves
Autoclaves use low-heat, high-pressure steam to treat infectious wastes. They can treat a wide range
of healthcare wastes. They consist of a metal vessel designed to withstand high pressures, with a
sealed door and pipes and valves through which steam is brought in and removed (figure 10.3).
Removal of air from the vessel is essential to ensure the penetration of steam into the waste. Because
they must withstand repeated buildup and release of steam pressures, their construction materials,
engineering design, fabrication, accuracy of pressure and temperature sensors, and testing must
meet requirements to operate safely.
Autoclaves generate significantly fewer air pollutants than incinerators and other high-heat thermal
processes. However, waste must be properly segregated to prevent hazardous chemicals from being
autoclaved. Poorly segregated waste may emit low levels of alcohols, phenols, formaldehyde, and
other organic compounds in the air and pose health risks to the autoclave operators and waste
workers. Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, cytotoxic waste, mercury, other hazardous
chemical waste, and radioactive waste should not be treated in an autoclave. Odors can also be a
problem if ventilation is insufficient. The air that is removed must be treated to prevent the release
of pathogenic aerosols; this is usually done with a high-efficiency particulate air filter or steam.
Treated waste from an autoclave will retain its physical appearance; shredders (though prone to
breakdowns) may reduce the volume 60%–80%. Glass, plastic, and metal waste can be recycled
after it is sterilized.
The three common types of autoclaves are:
Gravity-displacement autoclaves
Prevacuum or high-vacuum autoclaves
Pressure pulse autoclaves
Incineration of Waste
Incinerators can range from extremely sophisticated, high-temperature models to basic units that
operate at much lower temperatures. Properly maintained and operated incinerators eliminate
microorganisms from waste and reduce the waste completely to ashes. When selecting an
incinerator, first analyze the needs of the healthcare facility and municipal or regional disposal
requirements. Factors to consider include infrastructure of the area, local resources to support
construction and operation, cost estimates, and environmental policies (PATH 2010).
This section focuses on the selection, operation, and management of small-scale incinerators.
There are four basic types of incinerators that are commonly used for treating waste:
Note: Incinerators that meet specifications and are properly maintained and operated eliminate
microorganisms from waste and reduce the waste to ash.
Precautions
If resources are limited, the following precautions should be taken when considering incineration:
Provide an effective system for waste reduction and segregation (separate by type of waste).
Use an engineer-designed incinerator with sufficient residence time and temperatures to
minimize incomplete combustion of products and premature failures.
Place incinerators away from healthcare buildings, residential areas, or where food is grown.
Describe methods of operation clearly to achieve the desired combustion conditions and
emissions.
Plan periodic maintenance to replace or repair defective components.
Certain chemicals and waste products are highly combustible and should not be incinerated (box
10.1).
Box 10.1. Types of wastes that should not be incinerated
Ideally, a small-scale incinerator (figure 10.4) should have the following characteristics:
Has a minimum of two chambers.
Operates within a temperature range of 650–1,000 °C (1,202–1,832 °F).
Has a minimum of 1-second smoke-residence time (i.e., amount of time that the gases
take to travel through the incinerator).
Is corrosion-resistant.
Encapsulation of Waste
Encapsulation is the process of mixing waste with cement or other substances before disposal. This
process is used to reduce the risk of injury to people, reduce access to scavengers, and minimize the
risk of toxic waste migrating into surface water or groundwater. Encapsulation is primarily designed
for the safe disposal of sharps, but can also be used for disposal of solid residues from wastewater
treatment, incinerator ash, or small quantities of heavy metals (e.g., mercury), chemicals, and
cytotoxic pharmaceuticals when they cannot be returned to the manufacturer. Hard plastic boxes or
metallic drums can be filled to three-quarters full and then topped with wet cement or clay. After
hardening, the containers can be sealed and disposed of safely in a landfill. For waste containing
small quantities of heavy metal, create a mixture of 65% waste material, 15% lime, 15% cement,
and 5% water. This mixture is then poured into a container (e.g., plastic or metal) and allowed to
settle. Once it has completely dried, the container can be disposed of in a landfill (WHO 2014).
Note: Large quantities (over 1 kg [2.2 pounds]) of chemical (liquid) wastes should not be buried at the same
time, and burning of chemical waste should be spread over several days.
Limit health risks and environmental pollution from burying healthcare waste by:
Restricting access to the disposal site: build a fence around the site to keep animals and
children away.
Lining the burial site with a material of low permeability (e.g., clay), if available.
Selecting a site at least 50 meters (164 feet) away from any water source to prevent
contamination of the water table.
The site should:
Have proper drainage
Be located downhill from any wells
Be free of standing water
Not be in an area prone to flooding
How to Make and Use a Small Burial Site for Waste Disposal
STEP 1 Find an appropriate location.
STEP 2 Dig a pit 1 meter (3.2 feet) square and 2 meters (6.5 feet) deep. The bottom of the pit should
be 2 meters (6.5 feet) above the water table. Line the pit with clay or other low-
permeable material.
STEP 3 Dispose of the infectious waste in the pit and cover the waste with 10–15 cm (4–6 inches)
of dirt each day. The final layer of dirt should be 50–60 cm (20–24 inches) and
compacted to prevent odors and attraction of insects, and to keep animals from digging
up the buried waste. Depending on the volume of waste, this pit should last 30 to 60
days (figure 10.5) (WHO 2014).
Disposable Sharps
Sharps (e.g., hypodermic needles, suture needles, razors, and scalpel blades) require specialhandling
because they are the items most likely to injure the HCWs who use them and people in thecommunity
if these items go to the municipal landfill without proper treatment methods.
Treatment and disposal methods for sharps include:
By autoclave, followed by shredding (mechanical), and then disposal in a landfill or
sharps pit.
By incineration (sharp objects may not be completely destroyed by incineration, but it
does make them less likely to be reused or repurposed and less risky to handle) and
disposal in an ash pit.
By shredding (mechanical) and disposal in a sharps pit. (There is a risk of exposure to
staff handling non-decontaminated sharps.)
If other treatment options are not available, small quantities of sharps waste can be
encapsulated and disposed of in a landfill.
STEP 1 Put on PPE (utility gloves, face protection, long-sleeved, fluid-resistant gown, and plastic
apron, protective shoes) when handling liquid wastes. (See Volume 1, Chapter 5,
Personal Protective Equipment.)
STEP 2 Determine if the wastes require pretreatment before disposal. Blood and other infectious
agents from laboratory work should be sterilized by steam sterilization at theearliest
stage (i.e., inside the healthcare facility) before disposal, if possible.
STEP 3 Carefully pour liquid wastes down a utility sink drain or into a flushable toilet and
thoroughly rinse with water to remove residual wastes. Clean and disinfect the surfaces
(e.g., toilet or sink) to remove residual wastes using 1.0% chlorine solution and avoid
splashing the chlorine solution. If a sewerage system does not exist, dispose of liquids
using incineration or burial and not into open drains.
STEP 4 Wash the container that held the waste with detergent and water, disinfect using
intermediate- or low-level disinfectant, and dry completely before storing and using.
(See Volume 1, Chapter 9 Environmental Cleaning; Volume 2, Section 3, Chapter 3:
Clinical Laboratory Biosafety.)
STEP 5 Remove PPE.
STEP 6 Perform hand hygiene.
(WHO 2014)
disposed of in placenta pits, if other treatment options are not available or if sociocultural or
religious norms prohibit other forms of treatment.
The pit should be designed to prevent the contents from contaminating the groundwater (figure
10.6). The bottom of the pit should be at least 1.5 meters (5 feet) above the level of the groundwater.
Placenta pits are not recommended for sites where the water table is near the surface or in flood-
prone areas (WHO 2014).
Placenta pit
Figure 10.6. Placenta pit plan
Chemical Waste
Chemical waste includes residues of chemicals in their packaging, outdated or decomposed chemicals,
or chemicals that are no longer required. Small quantities of chemical waste are generally collected in
containers with infectious waste and can be incinerated, encapsulated, or buried. Large quantities of
chemical waste should not be collected with infectious waste. Because there is no safe and inexpensive
method for the disposal of chemical waste, the following options are recommended:
Return the chemical waste to the original supplier. This is the best option for the
disposal of specific chemical waste.
Incinerate at a high temperature.
Because these chemical waste disposal methods can be expensive and may be impractical, it is
important to keep chemical waste to a minimum. (See the Reduction of Healthcare Waste section
above in this chapter.)
Note: Different types of chemical waste should never be mixed. Chemical waste should not be disposed of
in a sewer system.
Chemical Containers
For plastic containers that held toxic substances, such as glutaraldehyde (e.g., Cidex) or
formaldehyde, rinse three times (dispose of the rinse water as chemical waste) with water and
dispose of by burning, encapsulating, or burying. Do not reuse these containers for other purposes.
Wear proper PPE to protect the eyes and skin from splashes, and rinse glass containers thoroughly
with water. Glass containers may be washed with soap, rinsed, and reused.
Pharmaceutical Waste
Small quantities of non-hazardous pharmaceutical (drugs or medicines) waste are usually
incinerated, encapsulated, or safely buried. Examples of non-hazardous pharmaceutical waste
include vitamins, salts, and amino acids (ampoules and fluids), solid or semi-solid tablets, granules,
powders, creams, gels, lotions and suppositories, and aerosols (e.g., sprays and inhalers). All
controlled substances, cytotoxic/genotoxic drugs, anti-infective/antibiotic drugs, and disinfectants
and antiseptics are considered hazardous waste (WHO 2014). It should be noted that temperatures
reached in a single-chamber drum or brick incinerator may be insufficient to totally destroy
pharmaceuticals and they can therefore remain hazardous.
Options for disposal of small quantities of pharmaceutical waste, such as outdated drugs (except
cytotoxic drugs and antibiotics), include the following:
Return of expired pharmaceuticals to the donor or manufacturer
Encapsulation and burial in a sanitary landfill
Chemical decomposition as per the manufacturer’s recommendations
For moderate quantities of relatively mild liquid (e.g., vitamin solutions, cough syrups, intravenous
solutions, eye drops), dilute in large amounts of water and discharge into a sewer. Antibiotics or
cytotoxic drugs should not be discharged into municipal sewers or watercourses.
Large quantities of pharmaceutical waste may be disposed of by the following methods:
pollution, mercury-containing products (e.g., thermometers and blood pressure equipment) should
be replaced with those that do not contain mercury.
Waste with high content of heavy metals should not be incinerated because of the toxic metallic
vapors released into the air nor should it be buried without encapsulation (i.e., placed in a closed,
tight container) because it may pollute groundwater. Usually, healthcare facilities have small
amounts of this type of waste. Disposal options include:
Recycling—the best disposal solution, if available.
Encapsulation, if recycling is not feasible—encapsulated waste may be disposed of in a
landfill.
Note: Do not touch mercury droplets with your hands unless wearing non-sterile or utility gloves.
SUMMARY
Healthcare waste is potentially hazardous. Healthcare facilities are responsible for managing the
waste they produce and appropriate management requires the collective efforts of various HCWs.
However, waste management is complex and managing waste is challenging for facilities in
resource-limited settings. Guidelines for disposal of waste from healthcare facilities set out by WHO
in 2014 may not be immediately attainable by many facilities. Waste minimization to limit the
volume of hazardous waste produced and waste segregation to minimize the proportion of the total
waste that is infectious or hazardous are key waste management measures in all settings. Choosing
the best available waste disposal method and working toward safer waste disposal to protect the
community and the environment is essential. Effective waste management will save resources,
reduce costs, and prevent injuries and exposure to infectious disease.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 10: HEALTHCARE WASTE MANAGEMENT
Ali S, Ahmed I. 2016. A Study of Hospital Waste Management Practices at Two Tertiary Care Teaching
Hospitals: What Are the Alternate Options in Hospitals of Developing Countries, Public Health and
Preventive Medicine, Vol.2, No.5, Oct. 2016, Pub. Date: Nov. 21, 2016.
http://files.aiscience.org/journal/article/html/70260044.html
Awodele, O, Adewoye, AA, Oparah, AC. 2016. Assessment of medical waste management in seven
hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Public Health, 16:269.
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-016-2916-1.
Caniato, M, Tudor, TL, Vaccari, M. 2016. Assessment of health-care waste management in a humanitarian
crisis: A case study of the Gaza Strip. Waste Management, 58:386–396.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27663706/.
Doumtsop, JG. 2014. Health care waste management: A multi speed development in the sub-Sahara
African region. The Pan African Medical Journal, 17:305. https://europepmc.org/article/med/25328601.
PATH. 2010. The incinerator guidebook: A practical guide for selecting, purchasing, installing, operating
and maintaining small-scale incinerators in low-resource settings.
http://www.path.org/publications/files/TS_mmis_incin_guide.pdf.
Tietjen, L, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities with
limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Global Environment Facility (GEF). n.d. Module 15:
Non-incineration treatment and disposal of healthcare waste.
https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/facilities/waste/module15.pdf?ua=1.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2011. UNEP 2010 annual report. Nairobi: UNEP.
https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7915.
World Health Organization (WHO). 1999. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42175/1/9241545259.pdf.
WHO. 2014. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities, 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85349/1/9789241548564_eng.pdf?ua=1.
World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2004. Practical guidelines for infection
control in health care facilities. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206946
Key Topics
Managing water and food services
Water safety
Water quality monitoring and surveillance
Prevention of food and waterborne diseases occurrence among patients hospitalized in healthcare
settings
BACKGROUND
Healthcare-associated diarrhea is a common problem in hospitals, children’s care facilities, and
nursing homes (Lynch et al. 2007). Outbreaks in healthcare facilities among hospitalized patients
have mostly been associated with unsafe food and water. A variety of organisms, including
Salmonella, Shigella, C. difficile, V. Cholera, C. albicans, Staph. aureus, cryptosporidium,
rotavirus, and other enteroviruses are responsible for contamination of food and water. Factors that
increase the risk of water- and foodborne diseases in healthcare facilities include the fact that they
serve food for more hours, serve food for ill and immune-compromised patients, transport and
distribute food at a greater distance, and prepare nasogastric feeding and special diets. In general,
the staff are often transient, poorly trained in food handling, and engage in unsafe practices
involving the storage, preparation, and handling of raw meat, chicken, fish, fresh eggs, and some
vegetables. Moreover, the quality of drinking water in countries with limited resources is often poor
and unsafe, again contributing to the poor quality of food services hygiene (scabies and trachoma).
related health problems. The staff should report any gastrointestinal problems or skin
lesions, especially on the hands. They need to know how to inspect properly; prepare
and store the foods they handle; how to clean and operate equipment they use, such as
slicers, blenders, and dishwashers, if they are available, and also the management of
waste.
Food utensils should be washed using a three-compartment washing system. These are washing,
cleansing, and sanitizing compartments.
Food Contamination
Food can be contaminated by the following three main hazard types:
Physical hazards (foreign objects): metal, wood, glass, plastic, etc.
Chemical hazards: bleach, caustic soda, detergents, pesticides, etc.
Microbiological: bacteria, viruses, molds, and parasites
Food that is contaminated with any of these hazards is unsafe and unsuitable to eat.
Clean hands and clothing; minimize jewelry on hands and wrists; tie back or cover hair; clean and
short fingernails; avoid unnecessary contact with food; cover all cuts and sores with a brightly
colored waterproof dressing; do not eat over food or food surfaces; do not prepare food when you
are ill; avoid touching your face and hair; do not cough or sneeze over food; do not taste food with
your fingers or “double dip” with a spoon and if wearing gloves, change frequently.
Proper Handwashing
When should you wash your hands? Before starting or resuming work; after using the toilet;
after smoking; after handling rubbish; after using a handkerchief or tissue; after touching your
hair or face; before and after handling raw food; before handling cooked food; and after any
cleaning task.
Handwashing facilities must be accessible to all food handlers, to be used only for the washing
of hands, and should provide soap and warm portable water. Provide disposable towels for
drying hands. Provide a bin for the disposable towels.
4. Cleaning
Must be continuous and ongoing; thoroughly clean and sanitize all food surfaces, equipment and
utensils with hot water and detergent and chemicals (sanitizers). Remember that most detergents do
not kill bacteria, but hot water and sanitizers do! Implement a cleaning schedule to ensure that
cleaning is conducted on a regular basis (including hard-to-reach places).
Cleaning and Sanitizing With/Without a Dishwasher
Wear rubber gloves to protect your hands from the hot water and chemicals.
Remove food particles by scraping or soaking.
Wash using hot water and detergent; change the water if it becomes cool or greasy.
Rinse in hot water with chemical sanitizer or in very hot water (above 80 °C - only if
sink has heating element and rinsing baskets) and leave to soak for 30 seconds.
Either drip-dry or use a clean tea towel to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.
5. Pest Control
Keep them out: seal the food premises.
Starve them out: keep the food premises clean.
Throw them out: conduct regular pest inspections or services.
Don’t give them a home: remove all unnecessary equipment and items.
Report all pest sightings or evidence of pest activity to your supervisor.
6. Waste Management
Place waste in plastic lined bins.
Water Safety
The quality and quantity of drinking water is a major determinant of health. The most predominant
waterborne disease—diarrhea—kills around 525,000 children under five each year. A significant
proportion of diarrheal disease can be prevented through safe drinking water and adequate sanitation
and hygiene. Diarrhea is a leading cause of malnutrition in children under five years old (WHO 2017).
There are several variants of the fecal-oral pathway of waterborne disease transmission. There are
four categories of infectious diseases transmission pathways through the water supply:
Waterborne diseases
Water-washed diseases
Water-based diseases
Water-related diseases
2. Non-probability sampling does not use random selection. The generalization of the findings is
not possible because the sample is not representative of the population.
Convenience sampling: a sample population is selected because it is readily available
and convenient.
Quota sampling: a population is first segmented into mutually exclusive subgroups.
Snowball sampling: The first respondent refers a friend. The friend also refers a friend,
and so on. Table 11.2 shows sample volume and transportation conditions.
Table 11.2. Sample volume and transportation conditions
Sample type Amount required Transport and storage Stability
Sample Dechlorination
When samples of chlorinated effluents are to be collected and tested, the sample must be
dechlorinated.
Chlorine remaining in the sample can further disinfect the sample during any holding
time after sample collection.
Because sterile sampling procedures must be followed for a valid bacteriological test,
the dechlorination steps cannot be performed after the sample is collected.
Procedure for dechlorination of bacteriological samples is as follows:
o When the water to be examined is likely to contain chlorine or chloramines,
sufficient sodium thiosulphate (Na2SO3*5H20) to neutralize this substance must be
added to each bottle as follows:
o Add 2-3 drops of sodium thiosulphate to sample collection bottle.
o Grams of chemicals required to neutralize residual chlorine concentrations
in 378,500 L of water. Table 11.3. shows sample dechlorination.
Table 11.3. Sample dechlorination
Residual chlorine concentration (mg/L) Sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate (Na2S2O3.5H2O)
0.3 181.44g
0.6 317.51g
0.9 498.95g
1 544.31g
1.3 725.75g
Samples should be collected and placed on ice in an insulated container if they cannot be
tested immediately; preferably held at <10 °C during transit. Samples should be tested
the same day and refrigerated overnight, if necessary.
If the time between collection and test exceeds six hours, the final report should include
information on the conditions and duration of sample transport. Samples exceeding 30
hours holding time (from collection to testing) should not be tested. The minimum
sampling frequency for drinking water in a distribution system is given in table 11.4.
Table 11.4. Recommended minimum sample numbers per year for E. coli testing in piped distribution
systems
separate container for drinking and other purpose by clearly writing on the container
which is for which).
Making water collected from unsafe sources safe for hospitalized patients: Water
boiled for one to five minutes is considered safe to drink, whereas water boiled for 20
minutes is labeled as high-level disinfected and is even safer. Alternatively, water can be
disinfected and made safe for drinking by adding 3-5 parts per million (ppm) chlorine
based on the water quality and the residual Cl should be 0.2-0.5 ppm. The formula for
preparing 0.001% of chlorine solution is given in these guidelines.
Monitoring/inspection: The quality of water used by healthcare facilities, including its
sources, collection, and storage, should be inspected regularly. The microbial water
quality of the sources should also be monitored quarterly.
o There are two types of sampling methods: probability and non-probability. When the
water to be examined is likely to contain chlorine or chloramines, sufficient sodium
thiosulphate (Na2S2O3.5H2O) to neutralize this substance must be added.
SUMMARY
Factors that increase the risk of water- and foodborne diseases in healthcare facilities include the
fact that they serve food for more hours, serve food for ill and immune-compromised patients,
transport and distribute food at a greater distance, and prepare nasogastric feeding and special diets.
In general, staff are often transient, poorly trained in food handling, and engage in unsafe practices
involving the storage, preparation, and handling of raw meat, chicken, fish, fresh eggs, and some
vegetables. The quality of drinking water in countries with limited resources is often poor and
unsafe, again contributing to poor quality food services.
Healthcare-associated diarrhea is a common problem in hospitals, children’s care facilities, and
nursing homes. Outbreaks in healthcare facilities among patients hospitalized have mostly been
associated with unsafe food and water.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 11: FOOD AND WATER SAFETY
Curless, MS, Ruparelia, CS, Thompson, E, et al., eds. 2018. Infection prevention and control: Reference
manual for health care facilities with limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego.
http://resources.jhpiego.org/resources/infection-prevention-and-control-reference-manual-health-care-
facilities-limited-resources.
Ethiopian Standards Agency. 2013. Compulsory Ethiopian standard. Drinking water – specifications.
https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/drinking_water_specifications.pdf.
Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia. 2004. Infection prevention guidelines for healthcare facilities in
Ethiopia. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---
ilo_aids/documents/legaldocument/wcms_125383.pdf.
National Drinking Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance and Response Guideline, 2017
https://www.cmpethiopia.org/content/download/2862/11842/file/WQMS&R%20Guideline,%20June%20201
7.pdf
The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Health. 2016. Ethiopia national hygiene and
environmental health strategy.
https://www.cmpethiopia.org/content/download/3559/14553/file/Hygiene%20and%20EH%20strategy.pdf
The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Health. Ethiopia, 2017 Integrated urban sanitation
and hygiene strategy. https://e-library.moh.gov.et/library/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/IUSHS-English-
strategy-final.pdf
Lynch, P, Pittet, D, Borg, MA, Mehtar, S. 2007. Infection control in countries with limited resources. The
Journal of Hospital Infection, 65 Suppl 2:148-50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17540260/
Tietjen, L, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities with
limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
WHO. 2011. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edition. Geneva: WHO.
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44584/9789241548151_eng.pdf.
Key Topics
The significance of regulating traffic flow and defining activity patterns in health facilities.
Designing traffic flow and activity patterns in procedure rooms, and in instrument processing and
surgical areas.
Traffic flow requirements for different areas.
BACKGROUND
Regulating the flow of visitors, patients, and staff plays a central role in preventing disease
transmission in healthcare facilities. This is because the number of microorganisms in a designated
area tends to be related to that of the number of people present and their activity. Microbial
contamination is found to be high in such areas as waiting rooms and places where soiled surgical
instruments and other equipment are initially processed. Microbial contamination is minimized by
reducing the number of people coming to the area and defining the activities taking place at each
place.
An important objective of IPC is to minimize the level of microbial contamination in areas where
patient care and instrument processing take place. Areas for instrument processing include
procedure areas, surgical units, and work areas (where instruments are processed). These include
dirty and clean areas where soiled instruments, equipment, and other items are first cleaned and then
processed and stored. It is important to direct activity patterns and traffic flow in the above-
mentioned areas to keep contaminated areas separate from areas where procedures take place. The
major areas are:
Procedure areas are settings where patients are examined and procedures (e.g., pelvic
examinations, wound care management, blood drawing, immunizations, IUD insertions
and removals, and normal childbirth) are carried out.
Surgical units are settings where major and minor operations are performed. The
surgical unit also includes preoperative and recovery rooms and several other areas.
Work areas are settings where instruments are being processed. These include dirty
and clean areas where soiled instruments, equipment, and other items are first cleaned
and either high-level disinfected or sterilized and then stored.
It is important to direct activity patterns and traffic flow in these areas to keep contaminated areas
separate from areas where procedures take place. Activities, such as waste disposal, instrument
processing, and cleaning procedure areas, should be carefully planned and organized to minimize
the risk of infection to patients and HCWs. Equally important is designing and implementing traffic
flow patterns that prevent soiled instruments and other items from coming across to the cleaned,
high-level disinfected or sterilized items. Traffic flow is also related with separating people who
have or are likely to have communicable diseases from those who are at risk (susceptible). These
people pose a great risk to susceptible patients and HCWs simply by availing themselves in the
same room; therefore, it is necessary to identify and remove them quickly.
Although the space requirements for performing various minor surgical procedures may not be
different, it may still be quite different to some extent depending on the classification of the
procedure (semi-critical or critical), the instrument processing requirements (HLD or sterilization).
Inserting or removing an IUD, for example, is classified as a semi-critical procedure not normally
sterile, or can be made so if necessary (Spaulding 1968). By contrast, inserting a laparoscope into
the abdomen is classified as a critical procedure because tissues that are normally sterile are being
touched. For the former, either sterile or high-level disinfected instruments are acceptable, but for
the latter, the preferred final processing is sterilization. To sum up, it should be noted that sterile
metal instruments with laparoscopy call for an additional separate area for final processing (high-
pressure sterilization by autoclaving) (figure 12.1b). This is especially important if the volume of
services is high (five or more procedures per day).
Figure 12.1. a and b: Floor plans for instrument cleaning, high-level disinfecting, and sterilizing areas in a
clinic and larger facility
The space, equipment, and need for well-defined traffic flow and activity patterns become
progressively more complex as the type of surgical procedure changes from general surgery and
obstetrics to open heart surgery.
As a guide, the space requirements for the types of surgery typically performed at district hospitals
are roughly the same as that of a busy surgical center or polyclinic. They include:
Changing room and scrub area for the clinic staff
Preoperative area where clients are examined and evaluated before surgery
Operating room
Recovery area for the observation of patients after surgery (may be combined with
the preoperative area)
Processing area for cleaning and sterilizing or high-level disinfecting instruments
and other items
Space for storing sterile packs and/or high-level disinfected containers of instruments
and other items
Procedure Area
Limit traffic to authorized staff and patients at all times.
Permit only the patient and staff (performing and assisting) in the procedure room
(family members should be limited with obstetrical procedures).
Staff should wear attire and PPE according to the procedures performed.
Place a clean container filled with clean water mixed with enzymatic detergent solution
(if available) for immediate immersing of instruments and other items once they are no
longer needed.
Have a leak-proof and covered waste container for disposal of contaminated waste items
(cotton, gauze, dressings) right after use.
Have a puncture-resistant container for the safe disposal of sharps (e.g., used suture
needles, hypodermic needles and syringes, and disposable scalpel blades) right after use.
Have storage space in procedure rooms for clean, high-level disinfected and sterile
supplies. (Storage shelves should be enclosed to minimize dust and debris collecting on
stored items.)
Surgical Unit
The surgical unit is often divided into four designated areas defined by the activities performed in
each: unrestricted, transition zone, semi-restricted, and restricted area. Environmental controls
and use of surgical attire increase as one moves from unrestricted to restricted areas. Staff with
respiratory or skin infections and/uncovered open sores should not be allowed in the surgical unit.
This area is the entrance from the main corridor and is isolated from other areas of the surgical unit.
This is the point through which the staff, patients, and materials enter the surgical unit.
B. Transition Zone
This area consists primarily of dressing rooms and lockers. It is where the staff put on surgical attire
that allows them to move from unrestricted to semi-restricted or restricted areas in the surgical unit.
Therefore, only authorized staff should enter this area.
C. Semi-Restricted Area
This is the peripheral support area of the surgical unit. It includes preoperative and recovery rooms;
storage space for sterile and high-level disinfected items; and corridors leading to the restricted area.
This is an area where support activities (e.g., instrument processing and storage) for the operating
room are carried out. Therefore, it is important to do the following:
Limit traffic to authorized staff and patients every time.
Have a work area for the processing of clean instruments.
Have storage space for clean, sterile, or high-level disinfected supplies with enclosed
shelves to minimize dust and debris collecting on stored items.
Flip flops or sandals should not be worn because they provide no protection from dropped sharps.
Have doors limiting access to the restricted area of the surgical unit.
Staff working in this area should wear surgical attire and a cap.
Staff should wear clean and closed shoes that will protect their feet from fluids and
dropped items.
D. Restricted Area
This designated area consists of the operating room(s) and scrub sink areas.
Depending on the size and type of healthcare facility, the work area for processing instruments (e.g.,
the CSSD) may be part of the surgical unit; or just connected to it; or an independent area
somewhere away from it.
This is the area where instruments, surgical gloves, and equipment are processed, and where staff
should be specially trained in handling, processing, and storing instruments, equipment, and other
clean, sterile, or high-level disinfected items. The CSSD is considered a semi-restricted area; hence,
all the recommendations for traffic patterns and proper attire described above should be followed.
Following surgery, place soiled instruments in their original sterile wrap and transport them to the
CSSD where they can be immediately cleaned before further processing.
Separate the “dirty” receiving/cleanup area (1) from the “clean” work area (2) with a physical barrier
(wall and door). If this is not possible, use a screen or paint a red line on the floor to designate
separation between the areas.
Note: Develop flow patterns to help ensure that contaminated items never come in contact with
clean, disinfected, or sterile items.
The function and equipment requirements for the four areas of a typical CSSD are summarized
below.
Staff entering the clean work area should wear clean cover gowns.
Sterility is lost when the package has tears in the wrapper, has become wet, has
been dropped on the floor, has dust on it, or is not sealed.
The shelf life of a sterile package will depend on the quality of packing;
conditions during storage and transport; and the amount of handling before use.
Sealing sterile packs in plastic bags can help prevent damage and contamination.
Most contaminating events are related to excessive or improper handling of the
packages.
The ideal number of times an item should be handled is three:
1. When removing it from the sterilizer cart and placing it on a storage shelf.
2. When transporting it to the place where it is to be used.
3. When selecting it to be opened for use.
Note: If supplies are being delivered to the surgical area, one person standing outside should pass them
through the door to a person inside the operating room to reduce traffic.
SUMMARY
Irrespective of the existing layout of the facility, design traffic flow and work practices in such a
way that keeps soiled/contaminated instruments, equipment, and textiles separate from the clean
and sterile instruments, equipment, and textiles, whether in the operating rooms or in the CSSD.
Appropriate traffic flow and work practices prevent accidental contamination of clean items and
reduce the risk of infections to patients, HCWs, and visitors.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 12: FACILITY DESIGN AND PATIENT FLOW
Russell, AD, Hugo, WB, & Ayliffe, GAJ, eds. 1999. Principles and practice of disinfection preservation and
sterilization (3. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Ltd.
Spaulding, EH. 1968. Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In Lawrence, C, Block, SS,
eds. Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
Tietjen, LG, Bossemeyer, D, McIntosh, N. 2003. Infection prevention: Guidelines for healthcare facilities
with limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnact433.pdf.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia (SEARO). 1988. A manual on infection
control in health facilities. India, New Delhi: SEARO.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204733?show=full
World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2004. Practical guidelines for
infection control in health care facilities. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206946
Key Topics
Hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk control
Occupational health activities for the prevention and management of infections in HCWs
Occupational health activities for the management of job-related illnesses and occupational exposures
Prevention strategies for infections relevant to occupational health in healthcare facilities
Occupational health activities for specific groups of HCWs
Post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV and HBV
Monitoring occupational health activities
BACKGROUND
Healthcare facilities around the world employ more than 59 million workers who are routinely
exposed to a variety of health and safety risks (WHO 2016a). These risks include exposure to
infectious agents, such as bloodborne pathogens, TB, viral respiratory infections, vaccine-
preventable diseases, bacterial infections, and gastrointestinal infections, among others. If an
infection is contracted as a result of an exposure to risk factors arising from workplace activity, it is
known as an occupational infection. In general, HCWs who have contact with patients, body fluids,
or specimens have a higher risk of acquiring or transmitting infections than those who have casual
contact with patients and the healthcare environment.
Occupational exposures to sharps injuries are an example of the substantial impact of occupational
infections among HCWs. It is estimated that 39% of HCV, 37% of HBV, and 4.4% of HIV
infections among HCWs worldwide are attributable to occupational exposure due to sharps injuries.
This amounts to an estimate of 16,000 HCV, 66,000 HBV, and 1,000 HIV occupational infections
annually (Prüss-Üstün Rapiti, Hutin 2005). It is thought that more than 90% of these are in limited-
resource countries (IFIC 2011).
It is notable that infection with HBV is 95% preventable with immunization, and the HBV vaccine
has contributed to a significant reduction of HBV in HCWs. However, fewer than 20% of HCWs
in some regions of the world have received all three doses of the vaccine needed for immunity from
HBV infection (APIC 2014a; IFIC 2003).
In general, occupational health deals with all aspects of work-related health and safety. It has a
strong focus on prevention, especially for infectious (such as disease exposures) and non-infectious
risks (such as injury). The goals of IPC intersect with those of occupational health in preventing and
addressing infectious hazards at healthcare facilities. Therefore, a large portion of occupational
health activities at a healthcare facility are also IPC activities (APIC 2014a).
Although the actual risk of infectious exposure for HCWs depends somewhat on the job description
and the setting, attention to IPC helps protect staff and patients in all settings. Emerging infectious
disease outbreaks, such as SARS in 2003, MERS-CoV in 2012, EVD in 2014, and COVID-19 have
highlighted the importance of IPC in protecting HCWs because transmission of these viruses to
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 264
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
HCWs occurred when they cared for infected patients. These outbreaks have demonstrated that
strategies to protect HCWs from exposure to infectious risks in the workplace are critically
important and that facilities must have the infrastructure in place to be able to adapt to changes in
emerging infectious threats. Healthcare facilities need staff knowledgeable in IPC to conduct and
support sound occupational health activities to minimize the risk of occupational infection in HCWs
and provide a safe environment for patients and staff (APIC 2014a; WHO 2016a; WHO 2016b) or
a perpetrator, if it is a case of sexual assault.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 265
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
undertake a hazard and risk assessment when there is a change to the workplace, including when
work systems, tools, machinery, or equipment change. Provide additional supervision when new
employees with reduced skill levels or knowledge are introduced to the workplace. The
effectiveness of control measures can be checked through regular reviews and consultation with
workers.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 266
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 267
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Post-exposure Follow up immediately those HCWs with job-related exposures and make
follow-up decisions about work restrictions and post-exposure care. (See Appendix
13 E, 13F, and 13G for disease-specific work restrictions.) See the
Occupational Health Activities for Management of Job-Related Illnesses
and Occupational Exposures section in this chapter.
Vaccination Organize vaccination sessions for those staff who need to complete
vaccinations according to national/facility recommendations.
Source: Curless et al. 2018
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 268
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 269
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Table 13.5. Occupational health activities for the management of job-related illnesses and exposures
Activity Key occupational health activities: Job-related illnesses and exposures
Infectious Identify infections in HCWs (whether community-acquired or job-related).
disease in Make decisions about the length and type of work restrictions (related to patient
HCWs care or food handling) and assignment to other duties (see Appendix 13L).
Report to public health authorities if it is a notifiable disease of public health
interest.
Sentinel Suspect a job-related infection in an HCW with an infectious disease known to
infections in spread in healthcare facilities. Certain occupational infections may be the result of
HCWs caring for patients with an unidentified infection (such as meningococcal meningitis
or novel influenza) or may indicate IPC lapses at the facility. (See Appendix 13L
for disease-specific risk of transmission to and from HCWs.)
Ensure that infections are managed following clinical guidelines and make
decisions about the length and type of work restrictions (as above).
Take necessary measures to prevent further spread of the infection through
investigation of possible routes of transmission in the facility and correct any
lapses in IPC.
Identify and facilitate clinical management and work restrictions of those exposed.
Monitor closely for additional cases (indicating a hospital or community outbreak).
Post-exposure Determine what is considered an exposure (exposure definition).
follow-up Obtain a list of those who have been exposed.
Counsel those exposed.
Offer PEP promptly when appropriate and available.
Determine any work restrictions.
Conduct medical surveillance for development of disease.
Determine when the HCW can return to work.
Maintain adequate and confidential documentation on the event.
Coordinate all of the above and any other activities, such as ongoing monitoring or
follow-up lab testing.
(See Volume 1, Chapter 6: Sharps Injuries and Management of Exposure to
Bloodborne Pathogens, for more information on post-exposure management for
HBV, HCV, and HIV. See Appendix 13A for disease-specific guidance for
management of exposed HCWs.)
Source: Curless et al. 2018
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 270
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Pregnant HCWs
Pregnancy does not increase the risk of acquisition of infection for most occupationally-acquired
infections, and clinical manifestations are no more severe in pregnant women than in others (APIC
2014b). However, pregnant HCWs may be anxious about potential infection and possible harm to
their babies. The staff supporting occupational health activities should address any questions that
pregnant HCWs may have about occupational exposures, how to avoid them, the management of
exposures, and any implications for the baby. Full compliance with standard precautions, such as
hand hygiene and appropriate PPE, and adherence to transmission-based precautions should be
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 271
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
adequate for pregnant HCWs in preventing most infectious diseases, and adherence to transmission-
based precautions should be adequate for pregnant HCWs in preventing most infectious diseases
(table 13.6).
However, as in the case of non-pregnant HCWs, non-immune pregnant HCWs should not care for
patients with measles, rubella, and varicella (APIC 2014b). Table 13.7 provides information on
occupational exposure to infection among pregnant HCWs, risks to their babies, and prevention
strategies. The information provided in the table will guide the occupational health team members
in making appropriate decisions. Table 13.7 also describes additional pertinent facts to assist with
management of relevant occupational exposures in pregnant HCWs.
Table 13.6. Infectious agents of concern for pregnant HCWs according to the risk of transmission
associated with providing healthcare services and available preventive measures
Healthcare- Healthcare- HAIs for which standard HAIs for which PEP Is
associated associated and transmission-based effective
acquisition possible acquisition Is precautions are the only
and prevented by unlikely preventive measures
vaccine
Anthrax, HAV, HBV, Herpes simplex Cytomegalovirus (CMV), HIV, N. meningitis,
influenza, Neisseria virus, VHF, HCV, parvovirus B19, syphilis
meningitis, pertussis, toxoplasmosis TB
rubella, measles,
varicella, tetanus,
diphtheria
Source: Curless et al. 2018
In settings where adequate infection control precautions (including PPE) are available and
immunizations for vaccine-preventable diseases are maintained, there are few instances in which
pregnant HCWs cannot provide the same care as their non-pregnant colleagues; they should not
routinely be restricted from duties on the basis of pregnancy status. However, pregnant HCWs
should not care for patients with parvovirus B16 and certain vaccine-preventable diseases if they
are non-immune. At times of PPE and vaccine shortage, assign pregnant HCWs to other tasks with
no risk for exposure to infectious agents (APIC 2014b; CDC 2013).
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 272
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Table 13.7. Management of occupational exposure to common infections for pregnant staff members
Agent In-hospital source Potential effect on the Rate of perinatal Maternal Prevention
fetus transmission screening
CMV Urine, blood, semen, Classic cytomegalic Primary infection Routine Efficacy of CMV immune globulin
vaginal secretion, inclusion disease (25–50%) screening not not established.
immunosuppressed (5–10%)* recommended;
transplant, dialysis, Recurrent infants antibody is No vaccine available
day care Hearing loss (52%) incompletely
(10–15%) Standard precautions
Symptomatic protective
(< 5–15%)
HAV Feces (most No fetal transmission None Routine Vaccine is a killed viral vaccine and
common), blood described; screening not can safely be used in pregnancy.
(rare) transmission can occur recommended Contact precautions during acute
at the time of delivery if phase.
the mother is still in the
infectious phase and The safety of HAV vaccination
can cause hepatitis during pregnancy has not been
determined; however, because the
vaccine is produced from
inactivated HAV, the theoretical
risk to the developing fetus is
expected to be low. The risk
associated with vaccination,
however, should be weighed
against the risk for HAV in women
who might be at high risk of
exposure to HAV.
HBV Blood, body fluids, Hepatitis, early onset HBsAg + 10% Routine HbsAg HBV vaccine during pregnancy
vaginal secretions, hepatocellular testing advised
semen carcinoma HBeAg + 90% Neonate: HBIG plus vaccine at
birth
Standard precautions
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 273
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Agent In-hospital source Potential effect on the Rate of perinatal Maternal Prevention
fetus transmission screening
HCV Blood, sexual Hepatitis 5% (0–25%) Routine No vaccine or immunoglobulin
screening not available; post-exposure treatment
recommended with antiviral agents being
investigated.
Standard precautions
Herpes Vesicular fluid, Sepsis, encephalitis, Primary genital Antibody testing Chemoprophylaxis at 36 weeks
simplex virus oropharyngeal, and meningitis, (33–50%) minimally useful, decreases shedding
vaginal secretions mucocutaneous genital
lesions, congenital Recurrent genital inspection for Standard precautions
malformation (rare) (1–2%) lesions if in labor
HIV Blood, body fluids No congenital Depends on HIV Routine maternal Antiretroviral chemoprophylxis
syndrome; if fetus viral titer and use of screening available for exposures,
infected, AIDS in 2–4 ART advised. postnatal/breastfeeding
years chemoprophylaxis for HIV+
If titer < 1,000 virus; If exposed, mothers and their infants.
rate 2% testing at 3, 6,
and 12 months Standard precautions
If titer ≥ 10,000; rate
up to 25%
Influenza Sneezing and No congenital Rare None Non-live vaccine (such as trivalent
coughing, respiratory syndrome: influenza in inactivated) for all pregnant HCW
tract secretions mother could cause during influenza season
hypoxia in fetus
Droplet precautions
Measles Respiratory secretion, Prematurity, Rare Antibody test Vaccine contraindicated during
(rubeola) coughing spontaneous abortion, pregnancy. Vaccination
no congenital recommended before conception.
syndrome
Airborne precautions
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 274
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Agent In-hospital source Potential effect on the Rate of perinatal Maternal Prevention
fetus transmission screening
Neisseria Respiratory secretion Sepsis Unknown None Chemoprophylaxis with ceftriaxone
meningitidis of untreated patients or azithromycin.
or those patients who No congenital
have received syndrome Vaccine if indicated for outbreak
antimicrobials for control.
< 24 hours Droplet precautions, based on
syndrome and for confirmed cases.
Rubella Respiratory Congenital syndrome 90% in first Routine rubella Vaccine contraindicated during
secretions trimester IgG testing in pregnancy. Vaccine before
pregnancy conception.
40–50% overall
Preconception No congenital rubella syndrome
screening described for vaccine.
recommended
Droplet precautions; contact
precautions for contact with
congenital rubella patients.
Syphilis Blood, lesion, fluid, Congenital syndrome Variable 10%–90%, VDRL RPR PEP with penicillin
amniotic fluid depends on stage
of maternal disease FTA-ABS Standard precautions, gloves until
and trimester of the 24 hours of effective therapy
infection completed for infants with
congenital syphilis and all patients
with skin and mucous membrane
lesions.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 275
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Agent In-hospital source Potential effect on the Rate of perinatal Maternal Prevention
fetus transmission screening
Tuberculosis Sputum, skin lesions Neonatal TB; liver most Rare TB skin test Post-exposure prevention
frequently infected recommendations vary with
Interferon tuberculin skin test reaction size
gamma-release and chest radiograph result.
assay blood test; Airborne precautions
if available.
Chest
radiograph
Varicella- Droplet or airborne Malformations (skin, Total 25%: Antibody Vaccine contraindicated during
zoster spread of vesicle fluid limb, central nervous congenital pregnancy. Vaccine before
or secretions of the system, eye); chicken syndrome conception.
respiratory tract pox (0–4%)
(scabs are not Varicella-zoster immune globulin
infective) within 96 hours’ exposure if
susceptible.
*Congenital syndrome: varying combinations of jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly, thrombocytopenia, anemia, retinopathy, and skin and bone lesions.
FTA-ABS = fluorescent treponemal absorption test; HBsAg=hepatitis B surface antigen; HBeAg=hepatitis B e-antigen; HBIG=hepatitis B immune globulin;
IgG=immunoglobulin G; RPR= apid plasma reagin test; VDRL=Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 276
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Laboratory Staff
HCWs in laboratories may be at increased risk of occupational exposure to the pathogens with
which they work. Laboratory staff should receive specific training on the risks and how to avoid
them (such as working under a biocontainment hood, using a closed centrifuge, avoiding mouth
pipetting) and have access to PPE, as required, according to the procedures they perform and the
pathogens with which they have contact. (Volume 2, Section 4, Chapter 3, Clinical Laboratory
Services, provides details on preventing infection among laboratory staff.) In addition to the
vaccines routinely recommended for all HCWs, further vaccinations may be appropriate for HCWs
working in a clinical or research laboratory (CDC 1998). National recommendations should be
consulted and followed, if available.
The following vaccines may be relevant for staff working with specific pathogens:
BCG (Mycobacterium tuberculosis)
HAV, Meningococcal (N. meningitidis)
Polio, rabies
Typhoid
(CDC 1998)
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 277
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
exposure. PEP can also be taken following exposure to non-bloodborne pathogens, such as invasive
Group A streptococcal infections, invasive meningococcal infections, and pertussis.
Occupational exposure is exposure of individuals to HIV and other bloodborne pathogens occurring
in the course of their work. This exposure should not be assumed to be directed solely to HCWs but
also to other workers, such as emergency rescue staff, waste-disposal workers, law enforcement
personnel, and firefighters because these staff are also likely to be exposed to health risks from
pathogens in blood and other potentially infectious body fluids while doing their work.
Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids is the exposure of an HCW to blood or other
potentially infectious materials during the performance of an employee's duties. Exposure to
bloodborne pathogens involves the skin, eyes, mucous membranes, or parenteral contact (e.g., a
needle stick).
Non-occupational exposure is an exposure to HIV and other bloodborne pathogens outside the work
setting. This term predominantly refers to potential exposure through sexual assault. Other forms of
potential non-occupational exposure include those arising from needle sharing among injecting drug
users, consensual sex, needle sticks in the community, fights or playground incidents resulting in
bleeding by an HIV-infected child, and mass causalities, such as road traffic accidents, etc.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 278
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
The PEP drug recommendations for percutaneous injury and mucous membrane or non-intact skin
exposure are found in tables 13.8 and 13.9.
Table 13.8. Recommended HIV PEP for percutaneous injuries
Status code (SC) Exposure code (EC)
EC 2 EC 3
SC 1 Recommend basic 2-drug PEP Recommend expanded 3-drug PEP
SC 2 Recommend expanded 3-drug PEP Recommend expanded 3-drug PEP
SC unknown Generally, no PEP is warranted; Generally, no PEP is warranted;
however, consider basic 2-drug PEP however, consider basic 2-drug PEP
for source with HIV risk factors. for source with HIV risk factors
HIV-negative No PEP warranted No PEP warranted
Table 13.9. Recommended HIV PEP for mucous membrane exposures and non-intact skin exposures
Status code (SC) Exposure code (EC)
EC 2 EC 3
SC 1 Consider basic 2-drug PEP Recommend basic 2-drug PEP
SC 2 Recommend basic 2-drug PEP Recommend expanded 3-drug PEP
SC unknown Generally, no PEP warranted; if PEP is Generally, no PEP warranted;
offered and administered and the however, consider basic 2-drug PEP
source is later determined to be HIV- for source with HIV risk factors
negative, PEP should be discontinued
HIV-negative No PEP warranted No PEP warranted
Adapted from: CDC 2005a
Adherence
Compliance rates of 95% or greater are required to actually maximize the benefits of ART. Although
parallel data are not available for PEP, the magnitude of the positive effects of high levels of
adherence to prescribed practices is generally assumed to be similar.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 279
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
If yes, was the exposure an isolated or episodic event, or the result of habitual behavior?
Exposure Source:
* Assessment of the behavioral factors and circumstances that led to HIV exposure includes emotional, psychological,
and social factors that contribute to risk behavior, such as depression, history of sexual abuse, and drug and alcohol
use.
**If the source is known to be HIV infected, information about his/her CD4 count, viral load, ARV medication history,
and history of ARV drug resistance should be obtained, when possible, to assist in the selection of a PEP regimen.
Table 13.10. Considerations of non-occupational PEP according to the type of risk exposure
Types of exposures that do not warrant Types of exposures that should prompt
PEP considerations of PEP
Human bites not involved with blood Unprotected receptive and insertive vaginal or anal
Exposure to sharps and needles not in intercourse with a source that is HIV infected or at
contact with an HIV infected or at risk risk for HIV infection
person Unprotected receptive penile-oral contact with
Mutual masturbation without skin break. ejaculation with a source that is HIV infected or at
Oral-anal contact risk of HIV infection
Receptive penile–oral contact without Oral-vaginal contact with blood exposure
ejaculation Needle sharing with a source known to be HIV
Insertive penile-oral contact infected or at risk for HIV infection
Oral-vaginal contact without blood Injuries with exposure to blood from a source
exposure known to be HIV infected or at risk for HIV infection
(including needle sticks, human bites, and
accidents)
This risk estimate considers many factors, including source viral load, presence of sexually transmitted
infections, and presence of ejaculates. It is prudent to recommend PEP for receptive oral sex with
ejaculation, although discussion about the conflicting data should occur.
Source: CDC 2018
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 280
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
who sustained injuries from needles contaminated with blood containing HBV, the risk of
developing clinical hepatitis, if the blood was both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg-
positive was 22% to 31%; the risk of developing serologic evidence of HBV infection was37% to
62%. By comparison, the risk of developing clinical hepatitis from a needle contaminated with
HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative blood was 1% to 6%, whereas the risk of developing serologic
evidence of HBV infection was 23% to 37% (Werner et al. 2013).
Table 13.11. Recommended PEP for exposure to HBV
Vaccination and Treatment
antibody response Source Source unknown
Source
status HBsAg not available for
HBsAg positive
of exposed workers* negative testing
Unvaccinated HBIG§ x 1 and initiate HB Initiate HB Initiate HB vaccine series
vaccine series vaccine series
Previously vaccinated
Known responder** No treatment No treatment No treatment
Non responder† HBIG x 1 and initiate No treatment If known high risk, treat
revaccination source, or as if source were HBsAg
HBIG x 2 §§ positive
Antibody Test exposed person for No treatment Test exposed person for
response unknown HBsab HBsab
1. If adequate**, no 1. If adequate**, no
treatment is necessary treatment is
2. If inadequate, administer necessary
HBIG x 1 vaccine booster 2. If inadequate†,
administer vaccine and
booster and recheck titer
in 1 to 2 months
* Persons who have previously been infected with HBV are immune to reinfection and do not require PEP.
¶ Antibody to HBsAg.
**A responder is a person with adequate levels of serum antibody to HBsAg (i.e., anti-HBs >10 mlU/ml).
†† A non-responder is a person with inadequate response to vaccination (i.e., serum anti-HBs < lO mlU/ml).
§§ The option of giving one dose of HBIG and reinitiating the vaccine series are preferred for non-responders who
have not completed a second 3-dose vaccine series. For persons who previously completed a second vaccine series
but failed to respond, two doses of HBIG are preferred.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 281
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 282
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
STEP 3 Time frames – as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours. Person responsible:
Physician, in-Charge of PEP management, HCW.
Evaluate the exposed HCW:
Check history of hepatitis B vaccination (currently there is no vaccine for
hepatitis C or HIV).
Determine immune and infection status of the exposed HCW.
For HBV, if not conducted previously, measure total HBV core antibodies (anti-HBc)
and HBV surface antibodies (anti-HBs)
For HCV, test for HCV antibodies (anti-HCV—a positive test means current or past
infection) and ALT (alanine aminotransferase).
If test is positive, test for viremia to confirm current infections.
For HIV, check status and history of previous HIV testing:
Provide HIV pretest counseling.
Offer HIV testing if the exposed HCW provides informed consent.
Offer HIV post-test counseling per the national counseling and testing
guidelines.
Refer to HIV care and treatment for those who test positive.
STEP 4 Time frame – as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours, simultaneously with Step
3 above. Person responsible: In-Charge of PEP management, patient’s treating physician.
Evaluate the exposure source:
Obtain detailed information on clinical status of the source person.
Determine vaccination and immune status of the source person:
o Test known source person for HBsAg.
o Test known source person for anti-HCV antibodies.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 283
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
o Check known source person for HIV status and history of previous HIV testing.
o Conduct clinical assessment of known source person for HIV/AIDS.
o Provide HIV pretest counseling.
o Conduct HIV testing if the source person provides informed consent.
o Offer HIV post-test counseling per the national counseling and testing guidelines.
o Refer to HIV care and treatment for those who test positive.
Determinants of PEP for occupational exposure to HBV are described in table 13.13.
Table 13.13. Determinants of PEP for occupational exposure to HBV
Vaccination and Treatment
antibody response Source HBsAg a
Source HBsAg negative Source unknown or not
status of exposed positive available for testing
HCW
Previously No treatment No treatment No treatment
vaccinated
Unvaccinated HBIGb single dose and Full HB vaccination Full HB vaccination
full HB vaccination
Known responders No treatment No treatment No treatment
Known non- HBIG single dose and No treatment If known high-risk source,
responderd revaccination or manage as if source were
second dose of HBIG HBsAg positive
Antibody response Test exposed person No treatment Test exposed person for anti-
unknown for anti-HBse: HBs:
If adequate level, no If adequate, no treatment is
treatment is necessary;
necessary; if inadequate, vaccine booster
if inadequate level, and check titer in 1–2 months
HBIG single dose and
HB vaccine booster
a HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen
b HBIG: hepatitis B immunoglobulin
c Known responder: a person who has an adequate level of serum antibody (anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL)
d Known non-responder: a person with inadequate response to vaccination (anti-HBs < 10 mIU/mL)
e Anti-HBs: hepatitis B surface antibody
STEP 5 Time frame – as soon as test results return (if any), must be within 72 hours from
exposure. Person responsible: Physician, In-Charge of PEP management, HCW.
Establish eligibility for PEP:
Refer to table 13.13 to determine the PEP required for HBV exposure.
Parenteral or mucous membrane exposure (e.g., sexual exposure, splashes to the eye,
nose, or oral cavity).
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 284
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 285
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
To facilitate counseling and informed decision making for HIV PEP, the list of information items
to be given for clients on PEP service is summarized in Appendix 13C. Patients given PEP drugs
should be counseled on the side effects of ARVs. The steps in the clinical management of HIV PEP
are summarized in Appendix 13B.
Children
Potential HIV exposure in children occurs most often by accident (e.g., needle sticks, in the
community, fights, or playground incidents resulting in bleeding by an HIV-infected child) or by
sexual abuse or assaults (Nourse et al. 1999). Young children who cannot swallow capsules or
tablets need to be given other alternative preparations appropriate for pediatric dosing (Appendix
13D). Adherence to the prescribed medications will depend on the involvement of parents or
guardians, and support provided to them.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 286
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Category II: Procedures for which bloodborne virus transmission is theoretically possible
but unlikely
Several surgical procedures are examples of such procedures, including ophthalmic surgery, dental
surgery that requires local anesthesia, minor oral surgical procedures, endoscopic and arthroscopic
procedures, provision of contraceptive methods, minor gynecological procedures, starting of central
lines, and medical male circumcisions.
Category III: Procedures for which there is definite risk of bloodborne transmission
Procedures for which there is definite risk of bloodborne transmission of viruses or that have
previously been classified as “exposure-prone.” All major surgical procedures that involve a high
volume of blood and body fluids are Category III procedures with definite risk of exposure.
Examples of Category III procedures are: general surgery; oral surgery with difficult access for
suturing; emergency surgical procedures involving bleeding and exposure to a high volume of
blood; obstetric procedures, including cesarean section; and orthopedic surgeries. Any major
surgical procedure that goes beyond three hours and requires changing gloves should not include
staff members infected with bloodborne pathogens.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 287
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
SUMMARY
In the course of their duties, millions of HCWs around the world are routinely exposed to a variety
of health and safety hazards, including infectious agents. Infections can be transmitted to HCWs,
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 288
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
who can in turn transmit the infections to patients and others. The goals of IPC intersect with those
of occupational health activities in preventing and addressing infectious hazards at healthcare
facilities. Therefore, IPC staff should be involved in occupational health activities at the facility,
and occupational health staff should be knowledgeable about IPC.
IPC elements of an occupational health program include surveillance, education, immunization, and
exposure prevention and response. Protection of staff by the application of standard precautions to
every patient, every time, and the use of disease- or syndrome-specific transmission-based
precautions to prevent exposures to infectious agents, are essential to prevent occupational
exposures. Recommendations for managing specific occupational exposures and infections in staff
members are based on the epidemiology of infectious disease transmission in healthcare facilities,
and they should target HCWs as potential sources or hosts. Special attention may be needed for
specific groups of employees with potential increased risk of exposure (laboratory, pregnant, and
emergency response personnel, and HCWs infected with HBV, HCV, and HIV). Last, the
effectiveness of interventions to protect HCWs from occupational infection should be evaluated.
Monitoring progress and identifying causes, with feedback to key persons, can enhance prevention
activities.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 13: INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ASPECTS OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH IN
HEALTHCARE SETTINGS
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). 2014a. Occupational health
(Chapter 100). In APIC text of infection control and epidemiology, 4th ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
APIC. 2014b. Pregnant healthcare personnel (Chapter 104). In APIC text of infection control and epidemiology,
4th ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
Boily MC, Baggaley RF, Wang L, Masse B, White RG, Hayes RJ, Alary M. 2009. Heterosexual risk of HIV-
1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The Lancet
Infectious Diseases, 9(2): 118-129. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19179227/
Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, Srivastava PU, Marcus R, Abiteboul D, Heptonstall J, Ippolito G, Lot
F, McKibben PS, Bell D M. 1997. A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after
percutaneous exposure. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Needlestick Surveillance Group. New
England Journal of Medicine, 337(21), 1485–1490. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711203372101
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1998. Guideline for infection control in health care
personnel, 1998. American Journal of Infection Control, 26:289–354.
https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/infectcontrol98.pdf.
CDC. 2001. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures
to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR, 50(RR11);1-42.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm.
CDC. 2002. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2002. MMWR, 51(RR06);1-80.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5106a1.htm.
CDC. 2005a. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational
exposures to HIV and recommendations for post exposure prophylaxis. MMWR, 54 (RR-9).
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5409.pdf. Updated 2013: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/20711
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 289
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
CDC. 2005b. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care
settings. MMWR, 54(RR-17):1–141. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5417.pdf.
CDC. 2005c. Antiretroviral post exposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection drug use, or other
nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States: Recommendations from the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. MMWR, 54 (No. RR-02):1‒20.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5402a1.htm.
CDC, DHHS. 2016. Updated guidelines for antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection
drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV— United States.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/programresources/cdc-hiv-npep-guidelines.pdf
CDC. 2015. Infection prevention and control recommendations for hospitalized patients under investigation
(PUIs) for Ebola virus disease (EVD) in U.S. hospitals. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-
us/hospitals/infection-control.html
CDC. 2018. CDC guidance for evaluating health-care personnel for hepatitis B virus protection and for
administering postexposure management. MMWR, 62(RR-10):1–19.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6210.pdf
CDC. Page last reviewed on August 30, 2018. Infection prevention and control recommendations for
hospitalized patients under investigation (PUIs) for Ebola virus disease (EVD) in U.S. hospitals.
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/hospitals/infection-control.html.
Curless, MS, Ruparelia, CS, Thompson, E, et al., eds. 2018. Infection prevention and control: Reference
manual for health care facilities with limited resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego.
http://resources.jhpiego.org/resources/infection-prevention-and-control-reference-manual-health-care-
facilities-limited-resources
Henderson, DK, Dembry, L, Fishman, NO, et al. 2010. SHEA guideline for management of healthcare
workers who are infected with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and/or human immunodeficiency virus.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 31(3):203–232. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20088696/.
International Federation of Infection Control (IFIC). 2011. IFIC basic concepts of infection control, 2nd
edition. Portadown, N Ireland: IFIC. https://www.theific.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IFIC-Book.pdf
Lanphear, BP, Linnemann, CC Jr, Cannon, CG, DeRonde, MM, Pendy, L, Kerley, LM. 1994. Hepatitis C
virus infection in healthcare workers: risk of exposure and infection. Infection Control and Hospital
Epidemiology, 15(12), 745–750. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7534324/
Lifson, AR, O’Malley, PM, Hessol, NA, Buchbinder, SP, Cannon, L, Rutherford, GW. 1990. HIV
seroconversion in two homosexual men after receptive oral intercourse with ejaculation: implications for
counseling concerning safe sexual practices. American Journal of Public Health, 80(12), 1509–1511.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2240343/
Nourse, CB. 1999, The human immunodeficiency virus in children. Modern Medicine of South Africa.
https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA02599333_3366
Prüss-Üstün, A, Rapiti, E, Hutin, Y. 2005. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to
contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine,
48(6):482–490. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16299710/
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 290
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Reitsma, AM, Closen, ML, Cunningham, M, et al. 2005. Infected physicians and invasive procedures: Safe
practice management. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 40:1665–1672.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15889366/.
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). 2014. SHEA response to institutions’
implementation of 2010 guideline for healthcare workers infected with bloodborne pathogens.
https://www.shea-online.org/images/guidelines/10_2014_Bloodborne_Pathogens_Public_Letter.pdf.
Werner, JM, Abdalla, A, Gara, N, Ghany, MG, Rehermann, B. 2013. The hepatitis B vaccine protects re-
exposed health care workers, but does not provide sterilizing immunity. Gastroenterology, 145(5):1026–
1034. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23916846/
World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: A practical guide, 2nd
ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/drugresist/WHO_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002_12/en/.
WHO. 2014. Occupational health: Ebola virus disease: Occupational safety and health.
http://www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/ebola_osh/en/.
WHO. 2014a. Guidelines on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV and the Use of Co-Trimoxazole
Prophylaxis for HIV-Related Infections Among Adults, Adolescents and Children: Recommendations for a
Public Health Approach: December 2014 supplement to the 2013 consolidated guidelines on the use of
antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014
Dec. 4, Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK298963/
WHO. 2016b. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the
national and acute health care facility level. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. https://www.who.int/gpsc/ipc-
components-guidelines/en/.
WHO. 2020. WHO recommendations for routine immunization-Summary tables. Table 4, Summary of
WHO position papers-Immunization of health care workers. Updated 2020.
https://www.who.int/immunization/policy/Immunization_routine_table4.pdf?ua=1.
Chapter 13: Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Healthcare Settings 291
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Key Topics
Significance of client education on IPC
Components of effective client education program
Good examples of a patient education program
Steps in client’s education on IPC
Models of client education
BACKGROUND
Educating and empowering patients and clients to actively participate in their care help reduce a
patient's risk of HAIs. However, creating an open dialogue can be a challenge in today's healthcare
system. So how can hospitals improve their patient education programs and help patients become
empowered and active in their treatment?
Four components have been reported as being fundamental to the process of patient/client
empowerment:
1. Patient understands his/her own role
2. Patient’s acquisition of sufficient knowledge of their ability to collaborate or be
involved with their healthcare provider
3. Patient’s knowledge and skills
4. The presence of facilitating environment
Based on these four components, empowerment can be defined as a process in which patients
understand their role, and are given knowledge and skills by their healthcare providers to perform
tasks cognizant of the community’s sociocultural differences and which encourages patient
participation.
First, hospitals need to understand what accreditation standards are required of hospitals. The Joint
Commission established certain standards to protect patients' rights and assist hospitals in patient
education. These standards, while broad, provide the framework for healthcare providers toestablish
patient education practices.
One of the Ethiopian Standard Agency hospital standards requires the hospital to provide patient
education and training based on the patient's needs. This includes conducting a learning needs
assessment and then administering training to the patient based on the assessment. The standard
provides examples of what hospitals should train patients on, including basic health practices and
safety.
The information given to the patient should be appropriate for the patient's age, literacy level,
education, and language skills. Patient materials should be geared between sixth and eighth grade
reading levels. Use of medical terminology or jargon should be avoided.
With shorter lengths of stay and limited time for teaching, print and audiovisual materials are
important adjuncts for any discharge teaching plan. However, they are just adjuncts and should not
replace individualized instruction. Printed materials are useful for reinforcing information provided
to patients while in the hospital and also serve as a ready resource. Printed material is an important
reminder of key points after patients return home.
Family members are the vital links in the transition from hospital to home care. Families must be
included in discussions and demonstrations. Family is any person who plays an important role in
the patient's life.
Every effort must be made to ensure that learning takes place in incremental steps and that patients
are not overwhelmed with too much information at one time.
The objective is to help HCWs recognize the contribution of patients and their families to the healing
process and to be receptive to patient input. This campaign must be designed to take into account
the numerous healthcare provider-related obstacles to patient participation (e.g., perceptionof a lack
of time and their level of training in the patient-caregiver relationship). Once HCWs are “on board,”
educational programs for patients must be offered so that they have the knowledge required to
participate.
The strategy also emphasizes that when educating patients, the healthcare provider needs to
understand the legitimacy and relevance of patient involvement and be convinced of the
effectiveness of involving patients. When involving patients, numerous patient-related factors
known to influence patient participation must be addressed and overcome. Although they are not
modifiable, socio-demographic factors (e.g., age, disease severity, and ethnicity) must also be taken
into account. When both the HCW`s and the patient’s support are secured, positive feedback will
emerge from the patients and contribute to the safety of healthcare.
Example 1
In addressing IP through hand hygiene, it is very important that the administration ensure that it
has clear policies and procedures in place that require:
Provision of education on hand hygiene on admission of the patient to the hospital.
Display of reminders of hand hygiene in a consistent and conspicuous location (for
example, the patient’s sink) so that it is easily accessible to patients and their family
caregivers.
Information on hand hygiene for patients can be designed in the form of printed
matter, an oral demonstration, or audiovisual means. Hand hygiene and other
educational reminders should be displayed in a consistent and highly noticeable
location.
Example 2
The steps of patient participation orientation in the hospital following surgery are:
Wash your hands carefully after handling any type of soiled material. This is especially
important after you have gone to the bathroom.
Because you are part of your healthcare team, do not be afraid to remind doctors and
nurses about washing their hands before working with you.
If you have an intravenous catheter, keep the skin around the dressing clean and dry.
Tell your nurse promptly if the dressing become loose or gets wet.
Likewise, if you have a dressing on the wound, let your nurse know promptly if it
became loose or gets wet.
If you have any type of catheter or drainage tube, let your nurse know promptly if it
becomes loose or dislodged.
Carefully follow your doctor’s instructions regarding breathing treatments and getting
out of bed. Don’t be afraid to ask for help, advice, or sufficient pain medications!
If possible, ask your friends and relatives not to visit you if they themselves feel ill.
Six key points that allow patients to be more actively involved in their own care
1. Share vital information with all caregivers, including all medicines, allergies, and ailments.
2. Ask questions about health problems and care.
3. Ask for help from family and friends.
4. Express your concerns.
5. Alert caregivers if your symptoms change.
6. Pay close attention to instructions.
Very often the patient is not only reluctant to speak up but they are not feeling well, or they may
have trouble communicating for a variety of reasons; therefore, a third party is vital.
2. Help the patient become an active participant
Talk to the patient about what he or she can do to optimize care, instead of focusing solely on what
the healthcare provider is going to do for the patient. Patients want to be involved in their care. They
want to be an active participant. And family members want to be involved in any way they can.
Encourage the patient to ask questions about his or her treatment. Urinary tract infections and central
line infections are common in hospitals and can be costly to the patient. When it comes to certain
things like catheters, assure patients that they can ask doctors and nurses, for example: “Is it essential
for my care?” Educating the patient on these practices may reduce the risk of infection by
eliminating a potential threat.
3. Let patients know what their care should look like
A lot of bad things in healthcare happen because of the variation in practice. If we can encourage
patients to know what to expect, then they can identify a variation in practice that is exposing them
to a potential risk.
Educate the patient on what dressings or catheters need to be changed on a daily basis and what the
process looks like. Showing the patient what to expect and what techniques help prevent infections
empowers him or her to look out for potential risks when shifts change and someone else begins
changing his or her dressings.
4. Don't forget about high-risk patients
Hospitals need to improve their patient education and infection control training with high risk
patients.
There are a number of patients out there who have diabetes. Significant changes in their blood sugar
can increase their chances of infection, whether they are in the hospital or not.
For patients at a higher risk of infection, such as those who are diabetic, taking immune suppressive
drugs, overweight, or smokers, healthcare providers need to discuss how these issues heighten their
risk for infection. Patients in the ICU are also considered high risk. Healthcare providers should
encourage ICU patients to get up and out of bed.
5. Understand the patient's rights to education
According to Ethiopian Food and Drug Administration (EFDA) standards, the patient possesses the
right to receive information in a manner in which the patient understands. In certain cases, the
hospital may need to provide interpreting or translation services to accommodate the patient's
communication needs. These needs should be determined during the initial learning needs
assessment.
Role Modeling
Role modeling, in which the HCW’s behavior toward hand hygiene or other positive behavior is
influenced by either peers or superiors, has been observed to influence compliance with and
motivation of the patient to be empowered.
Monitor the Keeping the patient’s environment and How to clean the patient’s
cleanliness of their equipment clean is extremely important— environment
area especially frequently touched items. Health care waste
management
Food and water
Medications Patients need to understand what medicines Use only physicians ordered
they are taking, and why—especially if antibiotics
antibiotics are being prescribed. Taking Finish a course of antibiotics
antibiotics the wrong way can promote
antibiotic resistance.
Post-surgical care Preventing infections after surgery is Cleaning of post-operative
essential. Teach your patients how to care wound
for their wound after leaving the healthcare
facility and to verify that any person that
inspects their wounds or changes their
dressings uses appropriate hand hygiene.
Care for their devices Advise your patients to ask if their device IV cannula
(catheter, etc.) is necessary. Catheters
Source: Infection prevention and you.org 2022
SUMMARY
Educating and empowering patients and clients to actively participate in their care help reduce a
patient's risk of hospital acquired infections. Actionable strategies are being developed with a strong
emphasis on working in partnership with healthcare authorities, partners, and professionals.
They are the basis of infection control precautions that are to be used as a minimal expectation in
the care of all patients. For example, hand hygiene is a major component of standard precautions
and one of the most effective methods to prevent transmission of pathogens associated with
healthcare. In addition, the use of PPE should be guided by risk assessment and the extent of contact
anticipated with blood and body fluids, or pathogens. Supplementary to the practices carried out by
health workers when providing care, all individuals (including patients and visitors) should comply
with infection control practices in healthcare settings.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 14: CLIENT EDUCATION ON INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
Bergeson, SC, Dean, JD. 2006. A systems approach to patient-centered care. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 296(23):2848-51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17179462/.
Delp, C, Jones, J. Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve
comprehension of instructions. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for
Academic Emergency Medicine, 3(3), 264–270. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8673784/
Infection prevention and you.com. 2022. https://infectionpreventionandyou.org/protect-your-
patients/educate-your-patients-on-infection-prevention/
WHO. 2005. World Alliance for Patient Safety. Global patient safety challenge 2005-2006. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO.
https://www.who.int/patientsafety/events/05/GPSC_Launch_ENGLISH_FINAL.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2009. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44102/9789241597906_eng.pdf;jsessionid=E054F5DA05
CC6AE82F801742BA9FB85B?sequence=1.
APPENDICES
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Appendix 4A. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form: World Health Organization 300
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Appendix 4A. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form: World Health Organization 301
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Appendix 4A. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form: World Health Organization 302
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
A provider may use the Alcohol-Based Hand Rub (ABHR) dispenser just outside the room door, inside the
room, at the sink, or the healthcare worker’s personal ABHR bottle.
DO NOT GUESS. If your view is blocked and you cannot confirm if provider performed hand hygiene, simply
check “Unsure” box.
Do not exceed 3 observations per provider in one session.
Other
1=Unknown
Other Providers (nursing,
Pharmacist/Laboratory
procedure
3=Transport
Hand cleaning with
medical and other
CO/PA/Dentist**
No hand hygiene
4=Nursing
care
Support Staff
Area location
Not observed
5=Blood
Technician
sample
Midwife
Nurse*
collection
ABHR
water
Obs #
6= Nutrition Circle
7= Admin ONE
ENTRY
EXIT
ENTRY
EXIT
ENTRY
EXIT
Appendix 4B. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form Modified for Room Entry and Exit 303
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Other
1=Unknown
Pharmacist/Laboratory
procedure
No hand hygiene
4=Nursing
care
Support Staff
Area location
Not observed
5=Blood
Technician
sample
Midwife
Nurse*
ABHR
collection
water
Obs #
6= Nutrition Circle
7= Admin ONE
ENTRY
EXIT
ENTRY
EXIT
ENTRY
EXIT
ENTRY
EXIT
* All types of nursing staff including diploma, degree, post-graduate, supervisor, and assistant.
Adapted from: Johns Hopkins Medicine. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. JHH Hand Hygiene Compliance
Data Collection Form. http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/heic/docs/HH_observation_form.pdf
Appendix 4B. Sample Hand Hygiene Observation Form Modified for Room Entry and Exit 304
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
perceptions, and other factors influencing compliance, will provide valuable information for strategy
development. Changing perceptions can be the means by which improvements in hand hygiene
practices are achieved. Similarly, assessing the infrastructure of the healthcare facility may help
explain current hand hygiene practices and will guide improvement efforts. Lack of access to sinks,
running water, and ABHR may all contribute to low hand hygiene compliance and should be
addressed during the implementation planning step.
Key Activities in Baseline Evaluation
Key Activities
Undertake baseline assessments:
Senior manager perception survey
HCW perceptions survey
Ward structure survey
HCW knowledge survey
Begin local production or market procurement of ABHR.
Conduct hand hygiene observations.
Monitor use of soap and ABHR.
Perform data entry and analysis.
Step 3: Implementation
Suggested duration: 3–4 months
Step 3 is implementation of the planned program. The availability of ABHR at the point of care, and
the education and training of HCWs are crucial to the success of this step. Healthcare facilities may
choose to hold a high-profile launch event to coincide with the start of the program’s
implementation. Publicizing leadership endorsement and support also helps foster a successful
implementation stage (WHO 2009a). During implementation, it is also important to evaluate HCWs’
tolerance and acceptance of ABHR. Monthly collection of hand hygiene observations should
continue during implementation, if possible. If time and resources are limited, observations should
occur only during Step 2 and Step 4.
Key Activities in Implementation
Key Activities
Launch the strategy.
Provide feedback on baseline data.
Distribute posters.
Distribute ABHR.
Distribute other WHO materials from the Pilot Implementation Pack.
Educate HCWs.
Undertake practical training of HCWs.
Undertake ABHR tolerance tests.
Complete monthly monitoring of usage of products.
Appendix 13A. Initial Management of a Person Reporting Exposure to Potentially Infectious Body Fluids 309
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Person reports First aid, assess the type and severity of exposure, use decision making tools to
exposure assess the exposure and decide eligibility for PEP
Fill the potential HIV exposure documentation and PEP follow-up form (Appendix 13G)
This form should be filled for every exposure despite the eligibility for PEP
Eligibility Eligible if the following four criteria are fulfilled:
o Exposure within 72 hours
o Exposed individual not known to be infected with HIV
o Significant exposure
o Person who was the source of exposure is HIV infected or has unknown HIV status
Informed Information about risks and benefits of PEP
consent for PEP Health education and counseling on adherence; side effects; risk reduction;
trauma or mental health problems; and social support and safety (both
occupational and non-occupational)
Consent may be given verbally
Baseline HIV testing of the exposed person
Give IEC materials in local language
Additional Rapid HIV test of the source person, if feasible and based on informed consent
laboratory and standard operating procedures; also consider testing the source patient for HBV
evaluations and HCV (if available)
Pregnancy testing of exposed person if the person is female and in the reproductive
age group
Hemoglobin (for zidovudine-containing PEP regimens) HBV and HCV screening, if
available
Medicine Medicine Two nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors + /- boosted
protease inhibitor
Give doses of ARVs enough for 3 to 5 days (starter packs)
Time to initiation The initial dose of antiretroviral medicines should be given as soon as possible but not
later than 72 hours after exposure
Duration of 28 days
therapy
Link to ART clinic The person started on PEP needs to be informed/report to the ART clinic the next
and subsequent workday for further follow-up.
follow-up there The exposed person should have a minimum of 6 visits to the ART clinic up to the
sixth month HIV testing.
In the ART clinic: Assess and manage side effects; assess and support adherence.
Give continued health education and counseling on side effects; on the importance of
treatment completion with good adherence, risk reduction; trauma or mental health
problems; and social support and safety (both occupational and non-occupational) in
the first ART clinic visit, at 2 weeks and at 4 weeks.
Do follow-up HIV testing 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after exposure.
Referral Intra facility and inter facility referrals, as appropriate
Appendix 13B. Summary of Steps in Clinical Management of HIV Post- Exposure Prophylaxis 310
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Appendix 13C. Facilitating Informed Patient Decision Making For HIV Post- Exposure Prophylaxis 311
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Enter date of visit in Ethiopian Calendar in Put a check mark on Reactive a) Hollow needle deep prick
dd/mm/yyyy format or Non- Reactive if the HIV b) Hollow needle superficial prick c) Solid
status of the source case is needle deep prick
known. If Unknown select d) Solid needle scratch
Unknown. e) Splash to the conjunctivae
f) Splash to the oral cavity
Circumstance of injury: Source code g) Splash to intact skin
a) Trying to secure intravenous line h) Splash to broken skin
SC negative: HIV negative
b) Needle stick injury during surgery i) Other (specify) cut injury with a surgical
SC1: HIV positive; blades etc.....
c) Needle stick while disposing of waste
Asymptomatic/High CD4
d) Amniotic fluid splash during delivery
e) Splash with body cavity fluids during procedure SC2: HIV positive: Exposure type: Non-Occupational
f) Other (specify): Cut injury with a surgical blade Advanced disease/patient on 1. Sexual assault
while doing a surgical procedure antiretroviral 2. Pediatric exposures
therapy/primary 3. Non HCW caregivers
Exposure code: Occupational Exposure infection/low CD4 4. Unanticipated high-risk exposure
Code Mucous Membrane (consensual sexual activity)
SC unknown: HIV status unknown
EC1= Few drops and short duration 5. Condom tears
or source unknown
Several drops /long duration/ major blood splash 6. Road traffic accident
Percutaneous 7. Other (specify) e.g., community fight, bite
EC2= Solid and Superficial scratch
Adherence grading
EC3= Hollow needle deep puncture
Remark: one may use the table to show any other additional information (e.g., linkage to HIV care or other support, tracking, lost, dead)
Appendix 13H. Occupational and Non-Occupational HIV Post Exposure Prophylaxis Register 316
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Treatment complete d
exposure
MRN/Card Number
person (R or NR)
Drug regimen
PEP Eligibility
Date
Occu patio n
Rape/ Other
Age
Sex
Department
status code
Case team/
Non-
Provided
Sexual
Base line
Remark
assault(√) occupation
3m
6m
6w
(Y/N)
al
e(√)
SN
(specify)
Appendix 13H. Occupational and Non-Occupational HIV Post Exposure Prophylaxis Register 317
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
2. At least one PEP trained personnel assigned in each case team 2. Is there clean water supply in the rooms?
on duty hours to give PEP service (as an additional Yes No
responsibility)
MD Nurse HO_ Junior Nurse/HA 3. Are the recommended ARVs for PEP available in PEP
3. At least one PIHCT trained personnel assigned in each case service delivery areas at least one pack from each?
team on duty hours to give CT service for PEP purpose(as Yes No
additional responsibility)
MD Nurse HO_ Junior Nurse/HA 4. Are condoms available in the service outlets?
Yes No
4. Is there PEP Focal Person?
Yes No 5. Is there a penile model to demonstrate about condom use?
Yes No
5. Is the PEP focal person a member of the MDT committee
and IP committee? 7. Are HIV test kits available in the PEP service outlets?
Yes No Yes No
6. Does PEP focal person regularly (weekly) follow, if 8. Are pregnancy test kits available in the PEP service outlets?
the PEP service is given according to the standard Yes No
management?
Yes No 9. Safety boxes available in every service outlet for safe disposal
of sharps
Yes No
3. Adherence counseling and follow-up of side effects done for Comments about this visit
PEP patients according to the standard
Yes No Sometimes
4. PITC protocol
9. PEP register
11. Condoms
13. Gloves
15. Lancet
Appendix 13J. Checklist for PEP at Site Level PEP Service Delivery 320
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Cholera Fecal-oral Rare Rare Hours to 5 Stool contact, Hand hygiene, Yes; No
contaminated water days, Shedding unwashed hands Contact Precautions, No
up to 10 days clean environment recommend-
after cessation ation for
HCWs
Work restrictions: No duty. Restrict from food handling.
Duration of restrictions: Until 48 hours after last episode of diarrhea except for food handlers: 2 consecutive negative fecal specimens at least 48 hours
apart and at least 48 hours after stopping antibiotics are required.*
Conjunctivitis due Contact with eye High High 5–12 days, Surfaces, Hand hygiene, No No
to adenovirus secretions and shedding from equipment, Contact Precautions,
contaminated incubation unwashed hands clean instruments,
surfaces and period until 14 and equipment
equipment days after onset
Work restrictions: No contact with patient or patient environment.
Duration of restrictions: Until discharge from eye ceases.
Cytomegalovirus Contact with urine, Rare Rare Unknown Contact with body Hand hygiene, No No
(CMV)⁰ saliva, breast milk, fluids, especially Standard Precautions
cervical secretions, saliva, blood, and
and semen from urine, possibly
infected person who unwashed hands
is actively shedding
virus
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 321
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Work restrictions: Acute (diarrhea with or without other symptoms): No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling.
Duration of restrictions: Until symptoms resolve (check the need for negative stool cultures for specific diarrheal etiologies).*
Diphtheria By respiratory No data Rare 2–5 days, Close contact, face- Hand hygiene, Yes, and PEP with
droplets, contact infectious for 2 to-face exposure, Droplet Precautions booster every antibiotic
with skin lesions weeks cough for pharyngeal 10 years† should be
lesions, Contact discussed,
Precautions for skin vaccination if
lesions none within 5
years
Work restrictions: Active disease: No duty; Asymptomatic carriers: No duty.
Duration of restrictions: Until antibiotic therapy completed and 2 negative cultures more than 24 hours apart.
Hemorrhagic Bloodborne; Negligible Moderate to 5–21 days Exposure of Hand hygiene, Barrier No Antivirals
fever possible contact high mucous Precautions to should be
(e.g., Ebola, transmission membranes or achieve full skin discussed
Marburg, Lassa respiratory tract, coverage to be used
virus) through broken skin with training and
or sharps injury trainer observer to
monitor
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 322
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Caring for EVD patients with adequate PPE and no known exposure: Active monitoring for fever and symptoms twice per day. Off duty if any symptoms.
Work restrictions: Active suspected or confirmed: Off duty. Post-exposure: Off duty. With active monitoring for fever and symptoms twice per day.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until cleared by medical staff. Post-exposure: Until 21 days after last exposure.
HAV Person-to-person by Rare Rare 15–50 days Stool contact, Hand hygiene, Yes; HCWs Immune
fecal-oral route; unwashed hands, Contact Precautions, are not globulin
infected food eating or drinking in especially with babies considered at
handlers with poor patient care area and incontinent increased riskᶧ
personal hygiene patients
can contaminate
food
Work restrictions: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling.
Duration of restrictions: Until 7 days after the onset of jaundice.
HBV⁰ Via sharps, mucosal, Low Moderate, 2– 45–180 days Sharps injury, blood Hand hygiene, Yes; Recom- Depends on
and non-intact skin, 40% after (average 60–90 and serum-derived Standard mended for all HCW
contact with blood, percutan- days) body fluid splashes Precautions, including HCWs† immune
semen, vaginal eous injury to mucous prevention of sharps status and
secretions, and from infected membranes injury, vaccination source
bloody fluids patient patient’s
status;§
for non-
immune
HCWs with
HBsAg,
positive
source HBIG
and
vaccination
series§
Work restrictions: Acute or chronic HBV: Do not exclude from duty but restrictions apply depending on circulating viral levels and procedures
performed by HCW. Requires review by occupational health/IPC personnel and possibly an expert review panel.#
Duration of restrictions: Different recommendations if HepB antigen is positive or negative and if HBV is < 10 4 GE/mL (genome equivalents/milliliter
plasma) or > 104 GE/mL.#
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 323
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
HCV⁰ Via sharps, mucosal, Low Moderate, 0– 6–7 weeks Sharps injury, Hand hygiene, No No
and non-intact skin 10% splash on mucous Standard
contact with blood, (average membranes or non- Precautions, including
semen, vaginal 1.8%) after intact skin prevention of sharps
secretions, and percutane- injury
bloody fluids ous injury
from infected
patient
Work restrictions: Acute or chronic HCV: Do not exclude from duty but restrictions apply depending on circulating viral levels and procedures
performed by HCW. Requires review by occupational health/IPC personnel and possibly an expert review panel.# Post-exposure:§
Duration of restrictions: Different recommendations if HCV is < 104 GE/mL or > 104 GE/mL.#
Hepatitis E Person to person by — — 2–9 weeks Contaminated food Hand hygiene, No No
fecal-oral route, or water, unwashed Standard Precautions
contaminated water, hands
contaminate food
Work restrictions: Off duty.
Duration of restrictions: Duration of illness, viral shedding in stool occurs 7–30 days after onset of jaundice.
Herpes simplex⁰ Contact with virus in Rare Low 2–14 days Contact with Hand hygiene, No No
saliva of carriers, infected site or Standard
contact with vesicle saliva, vaginal Precautions⁰ (Contact
fluid secretions, or Precautions in
amniotic fluid disseminated
infection)
Work restrictions: Genital: No restriction. Hands (herpetic whitlow): No contact with patient or the patient environment. Orofacial: No contact with high-
risk patients.◊
Duration of restrictions: Genital: None. Hands (herpetic whitlow): Until lesions heal.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 324
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Human Primarily via sharps Rare Low, 0.2– Within 6 months Sharps injury, Hand hygiene, No Depends on
immunodeficiency contact with blood; 0.4% after splash on mucous Standard Precautions type of body
virus (HIV)⁰ mucosal or non- sharps membranes or non- including prevention fluid, type of
intact skin contact exposure to intact skin of sharps injury exposure and
with blood; semen, infected source
vaginal secretions, person patient
and bloody body status;§
fluids less likely to when
transmit indicated,
initiate
antiretroviral
treatment as
soon as
possible
(within 72
hours)§
Work restrictions: Acute or chronic HIV: Do not exclude from duty but restrictions apply depending on circulating viral levels and procedures performed
by HCW. Requires review by occupational health/IPC personnel and possibly an expert review panel.# Post-exposure:§
Duration of restrictions: Different recommendations if circulating HIV viral burden is < 5x102 GE/mL or > 5x102 GE/mL.#
Influenza⁰ Droplet spread; Moderate Moderate 1–5 days Close contact with Hand hygiene, Yes; annual Antivirals
direct droplet patient (within 1–2 Droplet Precautions, immunization may be
transmission or meters from annual vaccine with a single recom-
droplet-to-contact coughing/ dose recom- mended in
transmission of sneezing) mended certain
respiratory yearly for situations
secretions of HCWᶧ
infected patients
Work restrictions: No contact with high-risk patients◊ during community outbreaks.
Duration of restrictions: Until acute symptoms resolve.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 325
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Measles⁰ Airborne; direct High High 5–21 days Inhaling droplets Hand hygiene, Yes; all HCWs Immune
airborne and airborne virus Airborne and Contact should be globulin
transmission or or contact with the Precautions, vaccine immune to
airborne-to-contact patient’s respiratory measles,
transmission of secretions proof of
respiratory immunity or
secretions of immunization
infected person required pre
patient
contact†
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure in non-immune people: Off duty.
Duration of restrictions: Active: 7 days after rash appears. Post-exposure: From 5th day after first exposure through 21st day after last exposure and/or 4
days after rash appears.
Meningococcal Droplet spread; — Rare 2–10 days Close contact (face to Hand hygiene, Yes; recom- Antibiotic
infectious direct droplet face) with respiratory Droplet Precautions mended for after close
N. meningitides transmission or secretions HCWs at risk contact‡
droplet-to-contact of patients with of exposure†
transmission of meningococcemia or (tetravalent A,
respiratory meningococcal C, W135, and
secretions of Y)
meningitis
infected patients
Work restrictions: Active: No duty. Post-exposure: No restrictions. Recommended prophylaxis includes: rifampin (600 mg twice a day for 2 days), a
single dose of ciprofloxacin (500 mg), or a single dose of ceftriaxone (250 mg) IM.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until 24 hours after start of effective antibiotic therapy. Post-exposure: No restrictions.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 326
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Mumps Droplet spread; Moderate Moderate 12–25 days Close contact with Hand hygiene, Yes; HCWs No
direct droplet patient (within 1–2 Droplet Precautions are not
transmission or meters from coughing/ indicated as a
droplet-to-contact sneezing) group at
transmission of increased
respiratory risk†
secretions and
saliva of infected
patients
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure in non-immune people: Off duty.
Duration of restrictions: Active: 9 days after onset of parotitis. Post-exposure: From 12th day after first exposure through 26th day after last exposure or 9
days after onset of parotitis.
Methicillin- Direct and indirect Rare Rare Depends on Unwashed hands, Hand hygiene, No No
resistant S. contact the type of contaminated Contact Precautions
aureus (MRSA) infection surfaces,
infection contaminated
equipment
Work restrictions: Active, draining skin lesions: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling. Carrier: No restriction unless
epidemiologically linked with transmission of the organism.
Duration of restrictions: Until lesions have resolved.
Norovirus Fecal-oral (direct or High High 12–48 hour Stool or vomit Hand hygiene, No No
indirect contact with contact, possibly Contact Precautions,
patient’s stool or aerosol clean equipment,
vomit), contaminated transmission during clean environment
surfaces, vomiting
contaminated food
or water
Work restrictions: Acute: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling.
Duration of restrictions: Until symptoms resolve, viral shedding in stool may occur.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 327
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Parvovirus B19 Contact with infected — Rare 6–10 days Respiratory Droplet Precautions No No
(erythema persons, fomites, or secretions for patients with fever
infectiosum or respiratory and anemia or
fifth disease) secretions aplastic crisis or
chronic B19, others
Standard Precautions
Work restrictions: Acute: Off duty. Exposed: no restriction.
Duration of restrictions: 7 days after onset of illness.
Pertussis Droplet spread; Moderate Moderate 7–10 days Respiratory Hand hygiene, Yes; recom- Macrolides
(whooping cough) direct droplet secretions and Droplet Precautions mendation for
transmission or respiratory droplets HCWs
droplet-to-contact currently
transmission of under review†
respiratory
secretions of
infected patients
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure asymptomatic: No restriction if PEP received. Post-exposure symptomatic: Off duty.
Duration of restrictions: Active: from beginning of catarrhal stage through 3 rd week after onset of paroxysms. Post-exposure: Until 5 days of effective
antibiotic therapy.
Poliomyelitis Contact with feces Rare Rare 3–21 days, Feces, respiratory Hand hygiene, Yes; all HCWs No
or urine of infected vaccine- secretions, lab Contact Precautions should have
person, respiratory associated polio specimens completed a
secretions and (oral vaccine): full course of
fomites 7–21 days after primary
vaccination vaccination
against polio†
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure: Vaccination series or booster.
Duration of restrictions: Duration of illness.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 328
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Rabies Animal bite, saliva, Rare Rare 1–3 months Lab samples, saliva Hand hygiene, Yes; HCWs Yes
tissue and organ of infected patients Standard Precautions are not at
transplants (theoretical) increased risk
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure: No restriction, consider post-exposure treatment.
Duration of restrictions: Rabies is mostly fatal.
Respiratory Droplet contact or Moderate Moderate 2–8 days Respiratory Hand hygiene, No No
syncytial virus direct contact with secretions, hands, Contact Precautions
(RSV) respiratory and fomites
secretions
Work restrictions: No contact with high-risk patients◊ during community outbreaks.
Duration of restrictions: Until acute symptoms resolve.
Rotavirus Person-to-person via Moderate Moderate 2–3 days Stool contact, Hand hygiene, Yes; adults No
fecal-oral route; food unwashed hands, Contact Precautions, including
handlers may environmental clean environment, HCWs are not
contaminate food surfaces, fomites clean equipment at increased
risk of severe
disease†
Work restrictions: Acute: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling.
Duration of restrictions: Until symptoms resolve.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 329
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Rubella⁰ Droplet contact or Moderate Moderate 12–23 days Respiratory Droplet Precautions Yes; all HCWs No
direct contact with droplets and (acute infection), should be
respiratory secretions Contact Precautions immune to
secretions; airborne (congenital rubella) rubella and
transmission not proof of
demonstrated immunity or
immunization
required
prepatient
contact†
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure in non-immune people: Off duty.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until 5 days after rash appears. Post-exposure: From 7th day after first exposure through 21st day after last exposure.
Salmonella or Person-to-person via Low Low 1–3 days Stool contact, Hand hygiene, Yes (typhoid), No
shigella fecal-oral route, via unwashed hands Contact Precautions currently no
contaminated food for incontinent recommen-
or water; food patients and babies dation
handlers with poor regarding
personal hygiene HCWs†
can contaminate
food
Work restrictions: Acute: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling. Carrier: No restriction from patient care unless staff
member handles food* or is epidemiologically linked with transmission of the organism.
Duration of restrictions: Until symptoms resolve unless food handler,* in which case a specific number of negative cultures is required.
Novel respiratory Droplets, contact Medium Medium Varies Small droplets from Hand hygiene, No No
viruses (SARS, (possibly airborne) respiratory Droplet and Contact
bird flu, MERS- secretions, Precautions, use
CoV, etc.) possibility of Airborne Precautions
airborne if possible
transmission
Work restrictions: Acute: No duty.
Duration of restrictions: Until acute symptoms resolve.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 330
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Staphylococcus Direct and indirect Rare Rare Foodborne: 30 Unwashed hands, Hand hygiene, No No
aureus contact minutes–6 days contaminated Contact Precautions
infection Impetigo: 1–10 surfaces,
days contaminated
(see also MRSA)
equipment
Toxic shock
syndrome: 2
days
Work restrictions: Active, draining skin lesions: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling. Carrier: No restriction unless
epidemiologically linked with transmission of the organism.
Duration of restrictions: Until lesions have resolved.
Scabies Direct skin-to-skin Low Low (typical 2–6 weeks Prolonged skin-to- Hand hygiene, No No
contact with infected (typical scabies), skin contact (typical Contact Precautions,
person scabies) to moderate scabies), skin-to- clean environment,
moderate (crusted skin contact during clean equipment
(crusted scabies) daily care (crusted
scabies) scabies),
infrequently fomites
Work restrictions: Active: No patient contact. Post-exposure: No restriction.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until after 1st treatment and cleared by medical evaluation. Post-exposure: Prophylactic treatment not indicated except in
outbreak situations.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 331
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Streptococcus, Droplet contact or Rare No data Pharyngitis 2–5 Contact with Hand hygiene; No No
Group A (GAS) direct contact with days, impetigo infected secretions; precautions depend
oral secretions or 7–10 days, HCWs are rarely on type of infection –
drainage from other infections carriers Minor skin and
infected wounds variable endometritis:
Standard
Precautions,
Major skin: Contact
Precautions,
Respiratory tract,
scarlet fever and
invasive disease:
Droplet Precautions
Work restrictions: Active: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling. Carrier: No restriction unless linked with transmission.
Duration of restrictions: Until 24 hours after effective treatment is started.
Tuberculosis Airborne Low to Low to high Weeks to years Incomplete Airborne Precautions Yes, BCG; Isoniazid
(TB)⁰ transmission from high implementation of There is no (INH) for
sources with active recommend control recommenda- treatment of
pulmonary or measures, including tion for HCWs latent TB
laryngeal TB; patient placement, in routine infection;
susceptible person facility ventilation, circumstances 4-drug
must inhale airborne and personal regimen for
droplet nuclei to respiratory active TB
become infected protection
Work restrictions: Active pulmonary or laryngeal: Off duty. Active extra-pulmonary: No restriction once pulmonary or laryngeal involvement is excluded.
Latent: No restriction. PPD (tuberculin skin test) conversion (> 10 mm induration): No restriction; consider isoniazid prophylaxis depending on local
recommendations.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until proven non-infectious (by sputum acid-fast bacilli [AFB] culture culture).
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 332
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Varicella, chicken Contact with High High 10–21 days (up Contact with lesions Airborne and Contact Yes; consider VZIG
pox, disseminated vesicles; droplet or to 28 days in and aerosols even Precautions vaccination of
zoster⁰ airborne spread from person who without direct potentially
respiratory tract receives contact with the susceptible
varicella-zoster infected patient HCWs (i.e.,
immune unvaccinated
globulin [VZIG]) and with no
history of
varicella)ᶧ
Work restrictions: Active: Off duty. Post-exposure in non-immune people: Off duty.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until all lesions are dry and crusted. Post-exposure: From 10th day after first exposure through 21st day (28th if VZIG is
given) after last exposure.
Localized Contact with Moderate Moderate Years after Contact with lesions Contact Precautions Yes; see VZIG
varicella-zoster vesicles; perhaps acute infection and perhaps and Airborne above;
(shingles) droplet or airborne aerosols from Precautions for shingles
spread from respiratory tract disseminated zoster vaccine not
respiratory tract from from disseminated recommend-
disseminated zoster zoster ed specifically
for HCWs
Work restrictions: Localized in healthy person: Cover lesions, no contact with high-risk patients.◊ Generalized or localized in immunosuppressed
person: No patient contact. Post-exposure in non-immune people: No patient contact.
Duration of restrictions: Active and generalized: Until all lesions are dry and crusted. Post-exposure: From 10th day after first exposure through 21st day
(28th if VZIG is given) after last exposure or if varicella occurs, until all lesions dry and crusted.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 333
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Disease/ Infection/ Mode of Transmission Risk Incubation Main Risk in Prevention Vaccine Post-
Syndrome Transmission Period Healthcare Available Exposure
Staff to Patient to Prophylaxis
Facility
Patient Staff (PEP)
Available
Viral respiratory Respiratory Moderate Moderate 1–7 days Droplet contact or Respiratory etiquette, Yes (influenza No
infections, acute secretions direct contact with hand hygiene, Droplet only)
febrile respiratory Precautions, annual
secretions, close vaccine
contact (1–2
meters) with patient
Work restrictions: No contact with high-risk patients◊ during community outbreaks.
Duration of restrictions: Until acute symptoms resolve.
§ PPE—Post-exposure prophylaxis; see Chapter 3, Sharps Injuries and Management of Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens, in this module for details about PEP for
bloodborne pathogens.
# See section above on Healthcare Workers Infected with HIV and/or HBV or HCV.
⁰ For information relevant to exposure of pregnant personnel, see Table 2-7 in this chapter.
◊ Definition of high-risk patient: neonates and immunocompromised persons of any age. For influenza, also those > 65 years, residents of nursing homes, persons
with chronic pulmonary or cardiac conditions, diabetes. (CDC 1998)
‡ Definition of close contact: Direct, mouth-to-mouth contact as in resuscitation attempts, endotracheal intubation, endotracheal tube management, or close
examination of oropharynx of patients. (CDC 1998; WHO 2002)
† For vaccine recommendations for HCWs (WHO 2016b), see Table 2-4.
* For management of illness in food handlers, see Volume 1, Chapter 12: Food and Water Safety.
Appendix 13K. Risk and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Workers Exposed to or Infected With Infectious Diseases of Importance in Healthcare Settings 334
National Infection Prevention and Control Reference Manual for Healthcare Service Providers and Managers | Volume 1
Source: Federal Ministry of Health. 2014. National guidelines for comprehensive HIV prevention, care and treatment.
https://www.childrenandaids.org/sites/default/files/2017-05/Ethiopia-Consolidated-ART-Guideline-2014.pdf