CG OralTitratedMiso
CG OralTitratedMiso
BACKGROUND
The incidence of labor induction has been steadily rising, and the rate of induced labor currently ap-
proaches 25 per cent, owing to the large number of referred patients with a medical indication for delivery,
principally postdates pregnancy, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, and other maternal and fetal condi-
tions necessitating delivery. Induction of labor can be a long and tedious process and involves considera-
ble resource expenditure. The incidence of cesarean delivery is increased following induced labor, partly
due to the risk condition for which the procedure was undertaken, and partly due to a lack of cervical
“ripeness” or readiness for labor. The Bishop score is a reasonable clinical guide that references the cer-
vical shortening, softening, and dilation that takes place as pregnancy advances. Bishop scores of 5 or
less are considered unfavorable, and are inversely related to the success of the induction and the length
of labor.
Both mechanical (Foley balloon, Atad balloon, Cook catheter system, seaweed based dilators) and phar-
macologic methods (oxytocin and various prostaglandins, including misoprostol (Cytotec), dinoprostone
(Cervidil) have been used to ripen the unfavorable cervix. Review of the current evidence suggests that
the prostaglandin misoprostol, administered either orally or intravaginally, are generally considered the
more effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This drug has a good safety profile at the
lower dosage range, and is convenient to use, but there are limitations to its use, particularly in women
with a uterus previously scarred as a result of cesarean delivery.
Misoprostol is associated with uterine tachysystole, which may result in fetal heart rate abnormalities, an
effect which is both dose and route of administration dependent. This adverse effect may result in the in-
duction being terminated urgently by a cesarean delivery, which otherwise would not have been indicat-
ed. The optimum dose of misoprostol at present is considered to be 25 mcg or less, administered by the
oral or vaginal route, Dosing of the drug is problematic in our setting as misoprostol is only supplied as
100 or 200 mcg tablets, making accurate fractionation of the drug into less than 50 mcg fragments virtual-
ly impossible. Likewise, the drug may not be every distributed within the inert material of the tablet, mak-
ing failure of response, or an exaggerated response, unpredictable.
In response to this challenge, dissolving the 200 mcg tablet in 200 mL of water is proposed as an accu-
rate, safe, and efficacious method of using the drug in safe low dose 20 mL/20 mcg aliquots, and is re-
ferred to as use of low dose titrated oral misoprostol. The dosing interval of every 2 hours for oral miso-
prostol is based on the known pharmacokinetics of the drug, which, in contradistinction to vaginal dosing,
when the drug is administered by the oral route, requires 30 to 60 minutes to achieve peak plasma levels,
but is then promptly metabolized, and is essentially undetectable after 120 minutes.
(see diagram - after Zeiman et al).
a. Women at term with an unfavorable cervix (defined as a Bishop score 5 or less) with a medical indi-
cation for delivery are reasonable candidates for use of this protocol.
b. Medical indications for delivery where women would be considered candidates for induction of
labor, examples include but not limited:
-Postdates pregnancy (41 weeks or more of gestation)
-Hypertensive disease of pregnancy
-Other indications, (fetal growth restriction, diabetes mellitus, other maternal or fetal conditions)
c. Women who would NOT be candidates for this protocol include those with:
-Prior cesarean delivery (or other prior uterine incision)
-Non-reassuring antenatal fetal surveillance (significant persistent decelerations of the fetal heart
rate noted on cardiotocography requiring urgent delivery)
-Active labor already in process (more than 3 palpable contractions lasting greater than 30 sec-
onds in 10 minutes, or cervical dilation greater than 4 cm)
-Any known obstetric contraindication to labor (e.g., placenta previa, malpresentation, active her-
pes simplex infection, etc.)
PROCEDURE
a. Prior to beginning the drug, the patient will have a 20-minute pre-ripening cardiotocogram.
b. If any of these are met, the patient would not be considered a ripening candidate:
-baseline fetal heart pattern abnormalities
-Bishop score of 6 or greater
-regular painful uterine contractions every 3 minutes lasting 30 seconds
-in active labor.
REFERENCES: (alpha)
1. ACOG. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114: 386–97. (Reaffirmed 2020)
2. Aalami-Harandi R, Karamali M, Moeini A. Induction of labor with titrated oral misoprostol solution
versus oxytocin in term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013
Feb;35(2):60-5.
3. Abramovici D, Goldwaser S, Mabie BC, Mercer BM, Goldwasser R, Sibai BM. A randomized con-
trol trial of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181:1108-12.
4. Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S, Jones LV, Caldwell DM. Meth-
ods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1462-70
5. Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Dias S, Jones LV, Navaratnam K, Caldwell DM.
Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015
Feb 5;350:h217.
6. Hung CH, Cheng SY, Chan TM, Lee MR. Evaluating misoprostol content in pregnant women with
hourly oral administration during labor induction by microElution solid phase extraction combined
with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed
Life Sci. 2015 Sep 1;1000:176-80
7. Berard V, Fiala C, Cameron S, Bombas T, Parachini M, Gemzell-Danielsson K.Instability of miso-
prostol tablets stored outside the blister: a potential serious concern for clinical outcome in medi-
cal abortion. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 15;9(12):e112401.
8. Bricker L, Peden H, Tomlinson AJ, Al-Hussaini TK, Idama T, Candelier C, Luckas M, Furniss H,
Davies A, Kumar B. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prela-
bour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.BJOG. 2008;115:1503-1511.
9. Cheng SY, Hsue CS, Hwang GH, Chen W, Li TC. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral
misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010
Feb;36(1):72-8
10. Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a
randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:119-125.
11. Cheng SY, Chen TC. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.Taiwan J Obstet
Gynecol. 2006;45:225-229
12. Dallenbach P, Boulvain M, Viardot C, Irion O. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor
induction:a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:162-7.
13. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Robinson JS Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised
controlled trial. BMJ 2006;332;509-513;
14. Elati A, Week AD. The use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology. BJOG 2009; 116(S1):61-
9.
15. Ho M, Cheng SY, Li TC. Titrated oral misoprostol solution compared with intravenous oxytocin for
labor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):612-8.
16. Hofmeyr GJ, Alfirevic Z, Matonhodze B, et al. Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of
labor: a multicenter randomized trial. BJOG 2001; 108:952-9.
17. Hofmeyr GJ, Matonhodze BB, Alfirevic Z, Campbell E, de Jager M, Nikodem C. Titrated oral
misoprostol solution--a new method of labour induction. S Afr Med J. 2001 Sep;91(9):775-6.
18. How HY, Leaseburg L, Khoury JC, Siddi I TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM. A comparison of various
routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Am J Obstet
Gyencol 2001; 185:911-5.
19. Kundodyiwa TW, Alfirevic Z, Weeka AD. Low dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a sys-
tematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:374-83.
20. Majoko F, Zwizwai M, Nystrom L, Lindmark G (2002) Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour:
a more effective agent than prostaglandin f2 alpha gel and prostaglandin e2 pessary. Central Af-
rican Journal of Medicine. pp. 123-128.
21. Matonhodze BB, Hofmeyr GJ, Levin J. Labour induction at term: a randomized control trial com-
paring Foley catheter and titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution
alone, and dinoprostone. South African Med J 2003; 93:375-9.
22. Moodley J, Venkatachalam S, Songca P. Misoprostol for cervical ripening at and near term--a
comparative study. 2003 South African Medical Journal. pp. 371-374.
23. Rehan-Uddin K, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, et al. Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of
misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:866-70.
24. Rouzi AA, Alsibiani S, Mansouri N, Alsanani N, Darhouse K. Ramdomized clinical trial between
hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostol for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gyne-
col 2014; 210:56.e1-6.
25. Rouzi AA, Alsahly N, Alamoudi R, Almansouri N, Alsinani N, Alkafy S, Rozzah R, Abduljabbar H
Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for
induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec 14
26. Souza AS, Feitosa FE, Costa AA, Pereira AP, Carvalho AS, Paixão RM, Katz L, Amorim MM.
Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet. 2013 Dec;123(3):207-12.
27. Souza AS, Scavuzzi A, Rodrigues DC, Oliveira RD, Feitosa FE, Amorim MM. Titrated oral solu-
tion of misoprostol for labour induction: a pilot study. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010
May;32(5):208-13. [Article in Portuguese]
28. Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G. A randomized control trial
of transcervical Foley cather to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet
Gynecol 2001; 97:603-7.
29. Tang OS, Schweer H, Sebberth HW, et al. Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration
of misoprostol. Hum Retrod 2002; 17:332-6.
30. Thaisomboon A, Russameecharoen K, Wanitpongpan P, Phattanachindakun B, Changnoi A.
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol and a conventional oral regimen
for cervical ripening and labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):13-6. doi:
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.027. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
31. Wang X, Yang A, Ma Q, Li X, Qin L, He T. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution
and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan
8.
32. Weeks A, Alfirevic Z, Faundes A, Hofmeyr GJ, Safar P, Wing D. Misoprostol for induction of la-
bour with a live fetus. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2007; 99:S194-7.
33. Zvandasara P, Saungweme G, Mlambo J, Chidembo W, Madzivanzira N, et al. Induction of la-
bour with titrated oral misoprostol suspension. A comparative study with vaginal misoprostol.
Central African Journal of Medicine. (2008) pp. 43-49.
34. Zeiman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, et al. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal
administration. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:88-92.
Reviews
Cheng SY. Individualized misoprostol dosing for labor induction or augmentation: A review. World J Ob-
stet Gynecol 2013; 2(4): 80-86 http://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v2/i4/80.htm#B23 (Accessed 4/15/23)
Vogel JP, West HM, Dowswell T. Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and
neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;(9):CD010648. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD010648.pub2. (Accessed 4/15/23)
Cheng SY. How to Manage Labor Induction or Augmentation to Decrease the Cesarean
Deliveries Rate, Cesarean Delivery, Dr. Raed Salim (Ed.), 2012.
ISBN: 978-953-51-0638-8, (Accessed 4/15/23)
Available from: www.intechopen.com
https://www.intechopen.com/books/cesarean-delivery/how-to-manage-labor-induction-or-augmentation-with-titrated-oral-misoprostol-to-
decrease-the-ces
French L. Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; CD00309.
(Accessed 4/15/23)
pre-dose
Monitor 20 min
post-dose
pre-dose
Monitor 20 min
post-dose
pre-dose
Monitor 20 min
post-dose
Table 2: Augmentation – Oral Titrated Misoprostol
pre-dose
Monitor 20 min
post-dose
pre-dose
Monitor 20 min
post-dose
pre-dose
Monitor 20 min
post-dose