Semantics- Revise (1)
Semantics- Revise (1)
Choose the semantics terms in the box that best fit the definitions in the following
sentences. Write down your answers in the chart below. Notice that there are more
words in the box than needed (2.0 marks) 10 words.
Q2. Determine whether these statements are true or false by circling T or F (2.0 marks)
10 sentences.
Q3. Provide two paraphrases for each of the following ambiguous sentences (2.0
marks) 4 sentences.
Q4. Questions about Sense relations (synonym, paraphrase, hyponymy, entailment
(one-way, two-way), antonymy, homonymy, polysemy) (2.0 marks) 10 sentences.
Q5. Questions about Equative sentence, Generic sentence, analytic, synthetic and
contradictory sentences (2.0 marks) 10 sentences.
DEFINITIONS:
Speaking SPEAKER MEANING is WHAT A SPEAKER MEANS (i.e. intends to convey) when he uses a piece
meaning of language.
Sentence SENTENCE MEANING (or WORD MEANING) is WHAT A SENTENCE (or WORD) MEANS (i.e. what
meaning. it counts as the equivalent of in the language concerned)
Referent, A REFERENT is an object or an entity in the real world or in the world of your imagination, that
reference is talked about
and The REFERENCE of a word or a linguistic expression is the relationship between that word or
sense expression and the thing, the action, the event, the quality, etc. it refers to. (language & world)
The SENSE of an expression is its place in a system of semantic relationships with other
expressions in the language.
Variable Variable reference: the expression that refers to different objects (categories of one object.)
reference [Context-dependente.]
, constant ~ The same expression may refer to different objects.
reference ~ It can be: possessive adjectives; demonstrative adjectives and pronouns; personal pronouns;
and co- adverb of place/ time; article,
reference
E.g President of Pakistan.
.
Constant reference: one expression always refers to the same object (regardless who is the
speaker)
Ex: Proper name, especially geographical names: Angelina Jolie, Smith, David, Vietnam,
Laos,...
occurs when two or more expressions refer to the same person or thing; they have the same
referent.
E.g Bill said Alice would arrive soon, and she did, the words Alice and she refer to the same
person.
Utterance An UTTERANCE is any STRETCH OF TALK, by one person, before and after which there is
, silence on the part of that person.
sentence, [a man pronounces and it has meaning]
propositio
n. ~ can be a word, a phrase, a sentence, a sequence of sentences.
~ by a particular person -> personal
~ on a particular occasion -> situational, contextual
~ physical
~ BELONG TO PARTICULAR PEOPLE
A PROPOSITION is that part of the meaning of the utterance of a declarative sentence which
describes some state of affairs.
Equative An EQUATIVE SENTENCE is one which is used to assert the identity of the referents of two
sentence. referring expressions, I.e to assert that two referring expressions have the same referent.
Generic Generic sentence: is a sentence in which some statement is made about a whole unrestricted
sentence. class of individuals, as opposed to any particular individual
Predicate, The PREDICATOR of a simple declarative sentence is the word (sometimes a group of words)
degree of which does not belong to any of the referring expressions and which, of the remainder, makes
the most specific contribution to the meaning of the sentence. Intuitively speaking, the
predicate, predicator describes the state or process in which the referring expressions are involved.
predicato
rs. A simple sentence only has one predicator.
A PREDICATE is any word (or sequence of words) which (in a given single sense) can function
as the predicator of a sentence。
Stereotyp STEREOTYPE *
e, The STEREOTYPE of a predicate is a list of the TYPICAL characteristics or features of things to
which the predicate may be applied.
prototype
.
PROTOTYPE *
A PROTOTYPE of a predicate is an object which is held to be very TYPICAL of the kind of object
which can be referred to by an expression containing the predicate. In other words, the
prototype of a predicate can be thought of as the most typical member of the extension of a
predicate
An analytic sentence, therefore, reflects a tacit (unspoken) agreement but the speakers of the
language about the senses of the words in it.
SYNTHETIC SENTENCE: A Synthetic sentence is one which is NOT analytic, but may be either
TRUE or FALSE, depending on the way the world is.
Ex: John is from Ireland
Sam’s wife is German.
Sense Synonym: Synonymy is the relationship between two predicates *that have the same sense.
relationsh [SYNONYMS that are NOT themselves synonyms of each other]
Ex: Evidence and Proof are synonyms
ip: *
~ Perfect synonymy: Synonyms interchangeable in ALL context. (Their cognitive and affective
value is preserved)
~ Partial synonymy: Synonyms interchangeable in SOME context. (They are just
interchangeable semantically)
Hyponymy: HYPONYMY is a sense relation between predicates (or sometimes longer phrases)
such that the meaning of one predicate (or phrase) is included in the meaning of the other.
Ex: flower -hyponymy- tulip, rose
NOTE:
- Given two negative sentences A and B, identical in every way except that A contains
a word X where B contains a different word Y, and X is a hyponym of Y then sentence
B entails sentence A.
- Sentences with word “all”: B entails A when the set of things referred to by B including all the
things in A.
- X is a hyponym of Y, then sentence A entails sentence B
+ Hyponymy is defined in terms of the inclusion of the sense of one item in the sense of another.
+ Synonymy can be seen as a special case of hyponymy (symmetrical hyponymy)
X is a hyponym of Y
Y is also a hyponym of X => X & Y are synonymous
~ One-way entailment
A proposition X ENTAILS a proposition Y if the truth of Y follows necessarily from the truth of X
Antonymy:
Binary antonymy are predicates which come in pairs and between them exhaust all the
relevant possibilities. *
Another way to view this is to say that a predicate is a binary antonym of another predicate if it
entails the negative of the other predicate. *
Ex: true and false, same – different, dead – alive, married – unmarried
Converse:
If a predicate describes a relationship between two things (or people) and some other predicate
describes the same relationship when the two things (or people) are mentioned in the opposite
order, then the two predicates are CONVERSES of each other. *
Ex: Parent and child, below – above, greater than – less than, own – belong to
Multiple Incompatibility:
- All the terms in a given system are mutually incompatible.
E.x a playing card cannot belong to both the hearts suit and the spades suit.
- Together, the members of a system cover all the relevant area.
E.x hearts, clubs, diamonds, and spades, there are no other suits.
=> There are large numbers of open-ended systems of multiple incompatibility.
Gradable antonym:
Two predicates are GRADABLE antonyms if they are at opposite ends of a continuous scale of
values (a scale which typically varies according to the context of use)
Ambiguity:
~ A word or sentence is AMBIGUOUS when it has more than one sense.
~ A sentence is AMBIGUOUS if is has two (or more) paraphrases which are not themselves
paraphrases of each other.
~ In the case of words and phrases, a word or phrase is AMBIGUOUS if it has two (or more)
Homonym:
A case of HOMONYM is one of an ambiguous word whose different senses are far apart from
each other and not obviously related to each other in any way with respect to a native
speaker’s intuition. Cases of homonymy seem very definitely to be matters of mere accident or
coincidence.
E.g: Mug (drinking vessel vs gullible person) would be a clear case of homonymy.
Bank (financial institution vs the side of a river or stream) is another clear case of
homonymy.
=> There is no obvious conceptual connection between the two meanings of either
word
Polysemy:
A case of Polysemy is one where a word has several very closely related senses. In other
words, a native speaker of the language has clear intuitions that the different senses are
related to each other in some way. *
~ Polysemy is much more common in human language than homonomy.
~ Most words have related variations in sense that depend on the particular linguistic
context in which they are used.
~ It is nearly impossible to draw a clear line between homonymy and polysemy -> they occupy
places along a graded continuum of meaning.
Three elements:
+ the various senses of a polysemous word have a central origin.
+ The links between these senses form a network.
+ understanding the ‘inner’ one contributes to understanding of the ‘outer’
one.
E.g: Mouth (mouth of a river , mouth of an animal)
Vagueness: A word is said to be “VAGUE” when it appears to have one basic sense
(monosemy) which is nevertheless flexible enough to allow for minor variations in meaning or
use which are not particularly entrenched in the speaker’s mind.
FORMAT:
1. Choose the semantics terms in the box that best fit the definitions in the
following sentences. Write down your answers in the chart below. Notice
that there are more words in the box than needed (2.0 marks) 10 words.
Any word (sequence of words) which (in a given single sense) can function Predicate
as the predicator of a sentence.
They are sentences which have the same proposition (meaning) Paraphrases
It is used to assert the identity of the referents of two referring expressions Equative
sentence
A sense relation between predicates (or sometimes longer phrases) such Hyponymy
that the meaning of one predicate (or phrase) is included in the meaning of
the other.
Sentence meaning (or word meaning) is what a sentence (or word) means.
It is used to assert the identity of the referents of two referring expressions. An equative
sentence
An object or an entity in the real world or in the world of your imagination A referent
They are sentences which have the same proposition (meaning) Paraphrases
They are special cases of hyponyms. They are hyponyms of each other. Synonyms
It is the same word which have more than one meaning A homonym
It is transitive Two-place
predicate in
entailment
sentences
When one linguistic expression refers to one and the same referent Constant
reference
Which is used to assert that two referring expressions have the same Equative
referent. Sentence
Any word (or sequence of words) which (in a given single sense) can A predicate
function as a predicator of a sentence
An object or any entity in the real world or in the word of your imagination Referent
that is talk about.
When two or more words/ phrases refer to the same referent Co-reference
Any stretch of talk, by one person, before and after which there is silence Utterance
on the part of that person.
A sense relation between predicates (or sometimes longer phrases) such Hyponymy
that the meaning of one predicate (or phrase) is included in the meaning of
the other.
An object or an entity in the real world or in the world of your imagination, Referent
which is talked about.
The relationship between two predicates that have the same sense. Synonym
Semantic is concerned with how sentences and texts are used in contexts. F
‘The wine is Italian, isn’t it?’ has the sentence meaning that ‘Is it right that the wine is made in Italy’ T
‘These papers mean (minds) more work’ is more reflective or sentence meaning. F
In this dialogue, the pragmatic/context-dependent meaning of the second sentence is that Tom is
not a good student.
An UTTERANCE is any stretch of sounds, by one person, before and after which there is silence F
on the part of that person.
“Helen put off the hat” and “Helen put the hat off” are the same sentences. [above/over] F
‘The wall was under the fly’ and ‘The fly was on the wall’ share the same proposition. F
Whether a sentence contains any referring expressions or not depends on the time and place at F
which the sentence -> UTTERANCE occurs.
The expression like Christmas Day 1990, the distance from school to my home, or a song can be T
considered referring expressions.
A word’s sense does not change every time the word takes on a new referent. T
The predicates in the phrase at the right place are at, the, right, place. F
Semantics is the systematic study of meaning or the way languages organizes and express the F
word.
-express the word meaning
Sentence meaning is what a speaker means when he makes an utterance in a certain situation. F
The sentence meaning of an utterance is simply the literal meaning of the words, phrases, and T
sentences
Some words such as “in, but, if, etc.” have sense and reference F
Some words such as “pen, dog, car, etc” have sense and reference T
A similar nuance of meaning in another language can be straight forwardly conveyed in English F
“John!” is an utterance T
A word’s referent does not change each time the word is applied to a different object or situation. F
A word’s sense does not change every time the word takes on new referent T
In the sentence Mary is a good daughter, the noun phrase a good daughter is a referring F
expression
A sentence has only one predictor and may have many predicates T
“The thief was chased by someone” does not entails “The police chased the thief” T
“Some kids running down the street” entails “Some boys running down the street” F
Indefinite noun phrase (for ex a book) can be used either as referring expressions or as predicating T
expression
The presence of a predicate in a referring expression helps the hearer to identify of a referring T
expression
A word’s referent does not change each time the word is applied to a different object or situation. F
3. Provide two paraphrases for each of the following ambiguous sentences
(2.0 marks) 4 sentences.
19. The thing that bothered Bill was crouching under the table
~
2. Give one possible paraphrase of “She bought him a She purchased a computer for him
computer”
9. “He borrowed Mary’s book” entails “Mary lent her book Yes / No
to him”. It is a two-way entailment?
12. Which are the subordinate of the word kitchenware? List Cutlery, Cookware, Bakeware,
four nouns. Utensils
13. Suggest two characteristic which should be included in the Caring and Supportive, Living
stereotype of the predicate family. Together
15. Give one possible paraphrase of: + Mike handed over his favorite
+ Mike gave his favorite book to Miley. book to Miley.
+ Tim borrowed a big loan from the bank. + Tim took out a substantial loan
from the bank.
20. Paraphrase:(2)
- Small boys and girls are playing musical instruments. -
- He saw the huge tree
- She looked at the bat.
- Josh reads the letter Tim wrote with excitement.
21.
cat-dog + multiple incompatibility
easy - difficult + gradable
good - bad + gradable
better than - worse than + converse
deciduous - evergreen
pass - fail
urban - rural
4. Is “That ape loves her child very much” a generic sentence? Yes / No
1. Choose the semantics terms in the box that best fit the definitions
in the sentences below. Notice that there are more words in the
box than needed. (2.0)
SPEAKER MEANING is WHAT A SPEAKER MEANS (i.e. intends to convey) when he uses a
piece of language.
SENTENCE MEANING (or WORD MEANING) is WHAT A SENTENCE (or WORD) MEANS (i.e.
what it counts as the equivalent (vật tương đương) of in the language concerned)
The TRIANGLE OF REFERENCE (also known as the TRIANGLE OF MEANING and the
SEMIOTIC TRIANGLE) is a model of how linguistic symbols relate to the objects they
represent
An UTTERANCE (PHÁT NGÔN) is any STRETCH OF TALK, by one person, before and after
which there is silence on the part of that person.
A PROPOSITION (MỆNH ĐỀ) is that part of the meaning of the utterance of a declarative
sentence which describes some state of affairs.
A REFERENT is an object or an entity in the real world or in the world of your imagination,
that is talked about
The REFERENCE of a word or a linguistic expression is the relationship between that word
or expression and the thing, the action, the event, the quality, etc. it refers to. (language &
world)
SENSE the general meaning or the concept underlying the word. (nét nghĩa)
The SENSE of an expression is its place in a system of semantic relationships with other
expressions in the language.
An EQUATIVE SENTENCE is one which is used to assert the identity of the referents of two
referring expressions, I.e to assert that two referring expressions have the same referent.
Variable reference: the expression that refers to different object (categories of one
object.) [Context-dependente.]
E.g President of Pakistan.
Constant reference: one expression always refers to the same object (regardless who is
the speaker)
Ex: Proper name, especially geographical names: Angelina Jolie, Smith, David, Vietnam,
Laos,...
Ex. HCM and Saigon -> both refer to the same city
The Morning Star and the Evening Star -> both refer to the planet Venus.
occurs when two or more expressions refer to the same person or thing; they have the same
referent.
E.g Bill said Alice would arrive soon, and she did, the words Alice and she refer to the same
person.
Sentence types:
+ ANALYTIC SENTENCE: An Analytic sentence is one that is necessarily TRUE as a result of the
senses of the words in it.
An analytic sentence, therefore, reflects a tacit (unspoken) agreement but the speakers of the
language about the senses of the words in it.
Ex: All elephants are animals
Sam’s wife is married.
+ SYNTHETIC SENTENCE: A Synthetic sentence is one which is NOT analytic, but may be either
TRUE or FALSE, depending on the way the world is.
Ex: John is from Ireland
Sam’s wife is German.
~ Perfect synonymy: Synonyms interchangeable in ALL context. (Their cognitive and affective value is
preserved)
~ Partial synonymy: Synonyms interchangeable in SOME context. (They are just interchangeable
semantically)
Grammar and meaning are separate though closely related aspects of language.
+ A predicate is a distinct sense of a word (of the kind we are dealing with). A word have many
different senses.
+ HYPONYMY: Hyponymy is a sense relation between predicates for sometimes longer phrases)
such that the meaning of one predicate (or phrase) is included in the meaning of the other.
Ex: flower -hyponymy- tulip, rose
Hyponymy is defined in terms of the inclusion of the sense of one item in the sense of another.
Synonymy can be seen as a special case of hyponymy (symmetrical hyponymy)
X is a hyponym of Y
Y is also a hyponym of X => X & Y are synonymous
Entailment:
~ One-way entailment
A proposition X ENTAILS a proposition Y if the truth of Y follows necessarily from the truth of X
The relationship between entailment and paraphrase is parallel to the relationship between hyponymy
and synonymy.
Synonymy is symmetric (i.e two-way) hyponymy, paraphrase is symmetric (i.e two-way) entailment
Another way to view this is to say that a predicate is a binary antonym of another predicate if it
entails the negative of the other predicate.
+ CONVERSE = relational antonym: If a predicate describes a relationship between two things (or
people) and some other predicate describes the same relationship when the two things (or
people) are mentioned in the opposite order, then the two predicates are CONVERSES of each
other.
Ex: give - receive.
“If … , then …” -> to test and identify relational antonym.
+ MULTIPLE INCOMPATIBILITY:
~ All the terms in a given system are mutually incompatible.
Ex: a playing card cannot belong to both the hearts suit and the spades suit.
~ Together, the members of a system cover all the relevant area
Ex: hearts, clubs, diamonds, and spades, there are no other suits.
-> There are large numbers of open-ended systems of multiple incompatibility
+ GRADABLE ANONYM: Two predicates are GRADABLE antonyms if they are at opposite ends
of a continuous scale of values (a scale which typically varies according to the context of use)
Ex: hot - cold: hot - warm - cool - cold.
Ambiguity:
~ A word or sentence is AMBIGUOUS when it has more than one sense.
~ A sentence is AMBIGUOUS if is has two (or more) paraphrases which are not themselves
paraphrases of each other.
~ In the case of words and phrases, a word or phrase is AMBIGUOUS id it has two (or more)
~ A case of HOMONYMY is one of an ambiguous word whose different senses are far apart from each
other and not obviously related to each other in any way with respect to a native speaker’s intuition.
Cases of homonymy seem very definitely to be matters of mere accident or coincidence.
E.g: Mug (drinking vessel vs gullible person) would be a clear case of homonymy.
Bank (financial institution vs the side of a river or stream) is another clear case of homonymy.
=> There is no obvious conceptual connection between the two meanings of either word
~ POLYSEMY: A case of Polysemy is one where a word has several very closely related senses. In
other words, a native speaker of the language has clear intuitions that the different senses are related to
each other in some way.
Three elements:
+ the various senses of a polysemous word have a central origin.
+ The links between these senses form a network.
+ understanding the ‘inner’ one contributes to understanding of the ‘outer’ one.
E.g: Mouth (mouth of a river , mouth of an animal)
- Polysemy is much more common in human language than homonomy.
- Most words have related variations in sense that depend on the particular linguistic context in which
they are used.
- It is nearly impossible to draw a clear line between homonymy and polysemy -> they occupy places
along a graded continuum of meaning.
~ VAGUENESS: A word is said to be ‘VAGUE’ when it appears to have one basic sense (monosemy)
which is nevertheless flexible enough to allow for minor variations in meaning or use which are not
particularly entrenched in the speaker’s mind.
E.g: aunt
SENSE RELATIONS:
+ Binary antonym ~ dead - alive
+ Converse = Relationship antonym ~ grandparent - grandchild
+ Multiple incompatibility
+ Gradable Antonym ~ hot - cold
+ Contradictory.
Semantic is concerned with how sentences and texts are used in contexts.
‘The wine is Italian, isn’t it?’ has the sentence meaning that ‘Is it right that the wine is made in Italy’
‘These papers mean (minds) more work’ is more reflectue or sentence meaning.
In this dialogue, the pragmatic/context-dependent meaning of the second sentence is that Tom is
not a good student
An UTTERANCE is any stretch of sounds, by one person, before and after which there is silence
on the part of that person.
“Helen put off the hat” and “Helen put the hat off” are the same sentences. [above/over]
‘The wall was under the fly’ and ‘The fly was on the wall’ share the same proposition.
Whether a sentence contains any referring expressions or not depends on the time and place at
which the sentence -> UTTERANCE occurs.
The expression like Christmas Day 1990, the distance from school to my home, or a song can be
considered referring expressions.
A word’s sense does not change every time the word takes on a new referent.
The predicates in the phrase at the right place are at, the, right, place.
Sentence meaning is what a speaker means when he makes an utterance in a certain situation.
The sentence meaning of an utterance is simply the literal meaning of the words, phrases, and
sentences
When I said “Dublin (A) has lots of attractions” I meant Dublin (B), Ireland,
not Dublin, Viginia.
Language: “Dublin (A) has lots of attractions”.
Minds/intentions: YES. Refer to Dublin Ireland.
The world: “Dublin (a)(b).
By turning off the music I didn’t mean that you should go.
Language: No
Minds/intentions: YES. Denies that the action was the result of intention of leaving
The world: music.