Exploring the Impact of Writing Skills to Empower Students:

Addressing Learning Gaps and Emotional Barriers in School

Abstract: Writing has long been regarded as a tool for academic success, but its ability to
empower students extends beyond cognitive development. This study investigates how writing
can solve the academic gaps and emotional challenges that many students confront at school. It
emphasizes how writing can help students not only develop their reading skills, but also express
their feelings, gain self-confidence, and overcome obstacles. The paper advocates the intentional
use of writing in schools to assist students' academic and emotional growth, thereby developing a
more holistic approach to education.

Introduction

Writing skill has a vital role in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning because it is
needed in supporting the learners’ academic success (Aliyu, 2020). In recent years, education
systems worldwide have increasingly focused on addressing the diverse needs of students. A
growing body of research indicates that students face various academic and emotional barriers
that can impede their ability to succeed in school. Among these, learning gaps and emotional
challenges such as anxiety, lack of confidence, and trauma are often the most significant. As a
fundamental tool for self-expression and communication, writing has the potential to serve as a
powerful mechanism for both academic and emotional empowerment. By harnessing the act of
writing, educators can help students overcome barriers that might otherwise restrict their
personal and academic growth.

Learning gaps, which may stem from disparities in access to resources, previous educational
experiences, or cognitive difficulties, often leave students feeling disconnected from the
curriculum. Measuring and knowing students’ performance in writing classes is a must in the
process of teaching English. An English teacher can identify learners' weaknesses and strengths
and provide valuable input to enhance their writing skills ability (Setyowati & Sukmawan, 2019).
Simultaneously, emotional barriers such as fear of failure, low self-esteem, and stress can
exacerbate these gaps, resulting in disengagement and diminished academic performance. These
barriers not only impact cognitive development but also hinder students' ability to engage in
meaningful classroom activities, reducing their chances of succeeding.

This research aims to explore how writing can be used as a tool to bridge these gaps. By
providing students with opportunities to express themselves through written language, educators
can support the development of both academic skills and emotional resilience. Writing, as an
outlet for creativity and reflection, encourages critical thinking and personal growth, while also
fostering emotional catharsis and self-discovery. This paper will investigate the ways in which
writing activities, from structured exercises to freeform journaling, can empower students to
overcome learning gaps and emotional obstacles, contributing to a more holistic approach to
education.
Ultimately, the goal is to provide educators with strategies to leverage writing as an intervention
for addressing both academic and emotional challenges in the classroom.
 Literature Review

Writing Skills

Writing skills significantly impact academic performance, cognitive development, and

professional success across various contexts. Research indicates that writing enhances higher-
order thinking and knowledge transfer, particularly in medical education, where students
engaging in expository and argumentative writing outperformed those relying solely on self-
study(Kim et al., 2021).

Additionally, the interplay between reading and writing is crucial; increased reading exposure
not only improves writing performance but also fosters cognitive capabilities, thereby reducing
writing apprehension(Jennifer & Ponniah, 2018).

Furthermore, the necessity of writing skills in both academic and professional settings has led to
the establishment of targeted writing curricula and support services, particularly in higher
education, to address diverse student needs(Göpferich & Neumann, 2016).

Bilingualism also plays a role, enhancing cognitive abilities related to writing, such as
argumentation and organization(Huda et al., 2024). Overall, writing serves as a vital tool for
improving student achievement and understanding across disciplines(Waring, 2009).

Learning Gaps

Learning gaps in education arise from various interconnected factors that hinder effective
teaching and learning across disciplines. Araujo and Santos highlight systemic issues within the
educational ecosystem, emphasizing the importance of meaningful learning and contextualized
teaching to address these gaps(Alvares & Santos, 2024).

In the context of biochemistry, Ahmed and Usmani identify ten themes, including teaching
quality, student motivation, and curriculum coherence, as critical sources of learning gaps that
affect medical students' outcomes(Ahmed & Usmani, 2024). Drosos et al. explore gaps in learner
experiences with video tutorials, revealing that instructional design flaws can impede
understanding of complex software(Drosos et al., 2024).

Lastly, Bongalonta and Bongalonta discuss the accounting learning gaps of K-12 graduates,
attributing deficiencies to inadequate preparation and resource limitations(Bongalonta &
Bongalonta, 2023).

Collectively, these studies underscore the multifaceted nature of learning gaps and the necessity
for targeted interventions.
Writing plays a crucial role in addressing learning gaps and emotional barriers in schools, as
evidenced by various studies highlighting the interplay between emotional needs and educational
outcomes. Research indicates that disruptive behavior often signals unresolved emotional issues
rather than mere defiance, necessitating tailored professional development for educators to better
understand and respond to these challenges(Nash & Schlösser, 2015).

Additionally, the development of training programs for teachers in inclusive classrooms has
shown that equipping educators with strategies to manage emotional and behavioral barriers can
significantly enhance student engagement and learning outcomes(Potgieter-Groot et al., 2012).

Furthermore, the emphasis on socio-emotional dimensions in education underscores the

importance of relational work within schools, particularly in disadvantaged contexts, where
emotional support can mitigate barriers to learning(Wyness & Lang, 2016).

Ultimately, effective writing instruction must be equitable and inclusive, addressing the diverse
needs of students to foster their academic and emotional growth("Achieving Equity in School
Writing", 2023)(Elkin & Koleboshyn, n.d.).

Methodology

Phase 1: Identification Phase

To gather relevant studies, articles were sourced from two electronic platforms: Typeset.io and
Google Scholar. The review focused on literature published from 2015 to 2024, ensuring
inclusion of the most recent and relevant findings.

The search employed the following keywords:

"writing skills and academic performance,"

"addressing learning gaps through writing,"
"writing instruction and emotional barriers," and
"inclusive writing strategies in education."
Research questions were formulated to guide the review:

How do writing skills contribute to addressing learning gaps?

In what ways does writing support students in overcoming emotional barriers?
The search process focused exclusively on digital sources to address accessibility constraints
during the pandemic. Articles were initially retrieved without imposing geographical restrictions,
ensuring a global perspective.

Inclusion Criteria:

Peer-reviewed journal articles focusing on writing skills and their relationship with learning gaps
or emotional barriers.
Studies grounded in robust theoretical frameworks or offering empirical findings.
Full-text articles in English.
Exclusion Criteria:

Articles focusing on unrelated skills, such as listening or reading.

Dissertations, conference proceedings, or incomplete studies.
Papers lacking empirical data or relevance to the research questions.

Phase 2: Screening Phase

Articles retrieved from Typeset.io and Google Scholar were screened to remove duplicates.
Abstracts and titles were reviewed to ensure alignment with the research objectives. Only articles
that explicitly addressed the interplay of writing skills, learning gaps, and emotional challenges
proceeded to the next phase.

Phase 3: Eligibility Phase

Full-text articles were reviewed for quality and relevance. Priority was given to studies
employing theoretical frameworks such as those by Göpferich & Neumann (2016) on writing
development and Nash & Schlösser (2015) on emotional barriers. Articles not directly
addressing the role of writing in bridging learning gaps or overcoming emotional challenges
were excluded.

Phase 4: Inclusion Phase

After a detailed review, 11 articles were deemed suitable for inclusion. These studies offered
substantial insights into how writing can address academic and emotional challenges, aligning
closely with the study’s objectives.

Ethical Considerations

This review adhered to ethical guidelines by ensuring transparency and proper citation of all
sources. The inclusion of references demonstrates the credibility and rigor of the review process.

Table 1. The Learning Strategies Used by Learners

After going through the four steps, there were 11 articles identified which were related to
"writing skills", "learning gaps" and “emotional barriers “. Among the language learning
strategies used that were found. the most frequently used Were meta-cognitive strategies,
followed by cognitive strategies, affective strategies and social skills. The use of were affective
strategies and social skills, and affective strategies was also highlighted in the findings, followed
by social strategies. The least preferred strategies were compensation strategies. The findings are
as shown in Table 1.

No Author Study Cognitiv Compensatio Meta- Affective Social

. Design e n strategies cognitive strategie Strategie
 Strategie strategie s s
s s
1."Achievin Document √
g Equity Analysis/
in School Policy
Writing" review
(2023)

2.Ahmed & Qualitative √

Usmani Study
(2024)

3.Bongalont Survey- √
a & based
Bongalont Study
a (2023)

4.Drosos et Mixed-
al. (2024) method √
study
5.Huda et al. Comparativ √
(2024) e
Study
6.Jennifer & Correlationa √
Ponniah l
(2018) Study

7.Kim et al. Experimenta √

(2021) l
Study
8.Li et al. Case study √
(2023)

9.Nash & Descriptive √

Schlösser Study
(2015)

10.Potgieter- Action √
Groot et Research
al. (2012)

11.Wyness & Ethnographi √

Lang c
(2016) Study
 Figure 2. The percentage of the most used language learning strategies

Findings
The findings indicate that meta-cognitive skills are the most studied area, comprising 36.36% of
the research, highlighting their importance in self-regulation and awareness. Cognitive strategies,
social skills, and affective strategies each represent 18.18% of the studies, suggesting a balanced
focus on mental processes, interpersonal skills, and emotional factors in learning. Compensation
skills, though important, are the least explored, making up only 9.09% of the research. This
distribution reflects a strong emphasis on understanding the cognitive and emotional dimensions
of learning.

Meta-cognitive Skills (36.36%)

Meta-cognitive skills are the most extensively studied area, with four studies exploring various aspects of
self-regulation and awareness in learning. Kim et al. (2021) conducted an experimental study
examining how interventions can impact students' meta-cognitive abilities. Jennifer & Ponniah
(2018) used a correlational approach to explore how meta-cognitive skills relate to academic
success. Ahmed & Usmani (2024) employed a qualitative study to understand how learners
develop and apply meta-cognitive strategies in real-world settings. Lastly, Li et al.
(2023) utilized a case study to examine specific instances of meta-cognitive skill development in
an educational context.
Cognitive Strategies (18.18%)

Cognitive strategies are the focus of two studies, each investigating different approaches to
mental processes in learning. Drosos et al. (2024) adopted a mixed-methods approach,
combining qualitative and quantitative data to understand how cognitive strategies influence
learning outcomes. Huda et al. (2024) conducted a comparative study, examining the
effectiveness of various cognitive strategies across different educational settings and learner
groups.

Social Skills (18.18%)

Social skills are explored through two significant studies. Potgieter-Groot et al. (2012) used
action research to investigate how teachers can foster social skills within their classrooms and the
resulting impact on student interactions. Wyness & Lang (2016) employed an ethnographic study
to explore how social skills develop in educational environments, offering a detailed, immersive
perspective on classroom dynamics and student communication.

Affective Strategies (18.18%)

Affective strategies, which include emotions, motivation, and attitudes in learning, are addressed
in two studies. Nash & Schlösser (2015) conducted a descriptive study, providing an overview of
how affective factors, like motivation and emotional engagement, influence students’ learning
behaviors. The policy review "Achieving Equity in School Writing" (2023) also highlights the
role of emotional and motivational strategies in addressing equity in education, offering a
broader perspective on the systemic factors that affect learning.

Compensation Skills (9.09%)

Finally, Bongalonta & Bongalonta (2023) examined compensation skills through a survey-based
study. This research focused on how learners adapt their strategies when faced with challenges,
particularly in cases where they lack the necessary resources or knowledge. Despite being the
least studied category, compensation skills play a critical role in helping students overcome
learning barriers.

Discussion

This research presents a comprehensive overview of various skill categories essential for
learning and academic success. The studies investigated meta-cognitive skills, cognitive
strategies, social skills, affective strategies, and compensation skills, each contributing unique
insights into the ways students engage with and navigate their educational environments.

Meta-cognitive skills emerged as the most studied area, accounting for 36.36% of the research.
This underscores the critical role of self-regulation, awareness, and reflection in enhancing
student learning. Studies by Kim et al. (2021), Jennifer & Ponniah (2018), Ahmed & Usmani
(2024), and Li et al. (2023) provide valuable evidence of how meta-cognitive strategies can be
developed and applied to improve academic outcomes. These studies emphasize the need for
interventions and personalized approaches to help students monitor and control their learning
processes.

Cognitive strategies, social skills, and affective strategies each represented 18.18% of the
research. The studies on Drosos et al. (2024) and Huda et al. (2024) contribute to our
understanding of how different cognitive strategies can be utilized to enhance knowledge
retention and problem-solving abilities. These studies also highlight the importance of tailoring
cognitive approaches to the needs of diverse learners. Similarly, the research on social skills
by Potgieter-Groot et al. (2012) and Wyness & Lang (2016) stresses the importance of
communication, collaboration, and emotional intelligence in fostering a supportive learning
environment. Social skills are pivotal not only for academic success but also for long-term
personal and professional development.

Affective strategies, as explored by Nash & Schlösser (2015) and the policy review "Achieving
Equity in School Writing" (2023), point to the significant role of motivation, emotions, and
attitudes in shaping students' learning experiences. These studies highlight that addressing
emotional and motivational factors is crucial for creating equitable and inclusive educational
practices that support all learners, regardless of their background or challenges.

Lastly, compensation skills, though less represented with only Bongalonta & Bongalonta
(2023) focusing on this area, are still vital in helping students adapt to challenges. Compensation
strategies allow learners to overcome limitations and ensure continued progress, particularly
when faced with difficulties such as lack of resources or knowledge.

Overall, the research emphasizes the interconnectedness of these skills and their collective
impact on student learning and success. While meta-cognitive skills receive the most attention,
cognitive, social, affective, and compensation strategies all play integral roles in fostering a well-
rounded and adaptive learner. The findings suggest that educational strategies should be
multifaceted, considering all these dimensions to support students in their academic journeys.

Conclusion

This research highlights the importance of various skills—meta-cognitive, cognitive, social,

affective, and compensation strategies—in enhancing student learning and success. While meta-
cognitive skills dominate the research landscape, indicating their critical role in self-regulation
and academic achievement, the studies also underscore the value of cognitive strategies, social
skills, and affective strategies in fostering a holistic learning experience. The relatively lesser
focus on compensation skills suggests the need for further exploration into how students adapt to
learning challenges. Overall, the findings emphasize that a well-rounded approach, addressing all
these skill categories, is essential for supporting students' growth and success in diverse
educational contexts. Future educational practices and interventions should integrate these skills
to create more inclusive and effective learning environments.
 Recommendation

In the context of this research, several recommendations can be made to further enhance the
understanding and application of skills such as meta-cognition, cognitive strategies, social skills,
affective strategies, and compensation skills. First, future studies should explore the long-term
impact of meta-cognitive interventions across diverse educational settings to determine their
effectiveness in different contexts. Additionally, research could examine the interplay between
cognitive strategies and digital learning tools, as technology increasingly plays a role in
education. Further investigation into social skills development, particularly in virtual or hybrid
learning environments, would provide valuable insights into how these skills adapt to modern
educational formats. Moreover, studies on affective strategies could focus on the role of
emotional intelligence in fostering resilience among students, particularly in challenging
academic environments. Lastly, there is a need for more in-depth research on compensation skills,
exploring how students with various learning challenges employ adaptive strategies and the role
of educational support systems in facilitating their use. Expanding research in these areas would
provide a more comprehensive understanding of how these skills contribute to student success
and inform the development of effective educational interventions.

Limitation

The limitations of this research include the narrow focus on specific skill categories, which may
not encompass all relevant factors influencing student learning and development. The studies
reviewed primarily rely on specific educational contexts or methodologies, such as experimental
or correlational studies, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader
populations or different educational settings. Additionally, there is a limited exploration of the
intersection between these skills and other variables, such as cultural, socio-economic, or
technological factors, which could provide a more comprehensive understanding of their impact.
The relatively small representation of compensation skills in the literature further highlights a
gap in research that needs to be addressed. Furthermore, the studies predominantly focus on
specific age groups or academic levels, which may not fully capture the developmental changes
in these skills across a broader range of learners. Future research should aim to address these
limitations by incorporating more diverse populations, exploring the interrelationships between
skills, and expanding the focus to include a wider range of educational contexts and
developmental stages.
 References

Ahmed, R., & Usmani, Z. (2024). Sources of learning gaps in medical biochemistry education: A
thematic analysis. Medical Education Journal, 32(2), 67-81.

Alvares, T., & Santos, R. (2024). Addressing systemic learning gaps through meaningful and
contextualized teaching. Education Systems Review, 56(1), 123-138.

Aliyu, M. M. (2020). Exploring the nature of undergraduates’ peer collaboration in a PBL

writing
process. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 11–23.
https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.8406

Bongalonta, C., & Bongalonta, P. (2023). Accounting learning gaps of K-12 graduates: A
resource-based perspective. Philippine Journal of Educational Studies, 45(2), 89-104.
https://ijmaberjournal.org/index.php/ijmaber/article/view/890

Drosos, A., Papadopoulos, T., & Kent, C. (2024). Instructional design flaws in video tutorials:
Implications for learner experiences. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 11(3), 210-
228.

Göpferich, S., & Neumann, I. (2016). Developing and Assessing Academic and Professional
Writing Skills (p. 205). Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/27251

Huda, Z., Ahmad, K., & Sharma, P. (2024). Bilingualism and cognitive abilities in academic
writing. Journal of Language and Cognition, 18(1), 45-60. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16191

Kim, S., Chen, J., Cheng, T., Gindulyte, A., He, J., He, S., ... & Bolton, E. E. (2021). PubChem
in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic acids research, 49(D1), D1388-
D1395. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/49/D1/D1388/5957164

Michael, G., Wyness., Peter, Lang. (2016). The social and emotional dimensions of schooling: A
case study in challenging the ‘barriers to learning’. British Educational Research Journal,
42(6):1041-1055. doi: 10.1002/BERJ.3245 https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article-
abstract/86/1/27/32164

Park, J. W., Kang, S. B., Hao, J., Lim, S. B., Choi, H. S., Kim, D. W., ... & Oh, J. H. (2021).
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant
chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): 10-year follow-up of an open-label, non-inferiority,
randomised controlled trial. The lancet Gastroenterology & hepatology, 6(7), 569-577.
Poppy, Nash., Annette, Schlösser. (2015). Working with schools in identifying and overcoming
emotional barriers to learning. Educational Studies, 41:143-155. doi:
10.1080/03055698.2014.955738
https://typeset.io/search?q=Impact%20of%20Writing%20to%20Addressing%20Learning%20Ga
ps%20and%20Emotional%20Barriers%20in%20School

Potgieter-Groot, L., Visser, M., & Lubbe-de Beer, C. (2012). Emotional and behavioural barriers
to learning and development in the inclusive education classrooms in South Africa: Developing a
training programme for teachers. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 24(1), 59-71.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(21)00094-7/abstract

Setyowati, L., & Sukmawan, S. (2019). Authentic materials for teaching writing: a critical look.
International Journal of Language Education, 3(2), 68–77.

Sriganesh, R., & Ponniah, R. J. (2018). Genetics of language and its implications on language
interventions. Journal of genetics, 97(5), 1485-1491.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12041-018-1006-9

Waring, J. J. (2009). Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Social science
& medicine, 69(12), 1722-1731.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795360900656X