PHILO Q1 Mod1 Doing-Philosophy.pdf
PHILO Q1 Mod1 Doing-Philosophy.pdf
INTRODUCTION TO THE
PHILOSOPHY OF THE
HUMAN PERSON
Quarter 1 – Module 1:
DOING PHILOSOPHY
Philosophy – Grade 11/12 Alternative Delivery
Mode Quarter 1 – Module 1: Doing Philosophy
First Edition, 2020
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work
of the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or
office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit.
Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of
royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from
their respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim
ownership over them.
1
11/12
INTRODUCTION
TO THE
PHILOSOPHY OF
THE HUMAN
PERSON
Quarter 1 – Module 1:
DOING PHILOSOPHY
2
Introductory Message
For the facilitator:
As a facilitator you are expected to orient the learners on how to use this module.
You also need to keep track of the learners' progress while allowing them to
manage their own learning. Furthermore, you are expected to encourage and assist
the learners as they do the tasks included in the module.
3
For the learner: Welcome to the Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person
Alternative
Delivery Mode (ADM) Module on Doing Philosophy.
The hand is one of the most symbolized part of the human body. It is often used to
depict skill, action and purpose. Through our hands we may learn, create and
accomplish. Hence, the hand in this learning resource signifies that you as a
learner is capable and empowered to successfully achieve the relevant
competencies and skills at your own pace and time. Your academic success lies in
your own hands!
This module was designed to provide you with fun and meaningful opportunities
for guided and independent learning at your own pace and time. You will be
enabled to process the contents of the learning resource while being an active
learner.
This module has the following parts and corresponding icons:
What I Need to Know This will give you an idea of the skills or
competencies you are expected to learn in
the module.
4
skill into real life situations or concerns. This is a
1. Use the module with care. Do not put unnecessary mark/s on any part of
the module. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises.
2. Don’t forget to answer What I Know before moving on to the other activities
included in the module.
3. Read the instruction carefully before doing each task.
4. Observe honesty and integrity in doing the tasks and checking your
answers.
5. Finish the task at hand before proceeding to the next.
6. Return this module to your teacher/facilitator once you are through with it.
If you encounter any difficulty in answering the tasks in this module, do not
hesitate to consult your teacher or facilitator. Always bear in mind that you are
not alone.
We hope that through this material, you will experience meaningful learning
and gain deep understanding of the relevant competencies. You can do it!
5
What I Need to Know
This module was designed and written with you in mind. It is here to help you master the nature
of Philosophy. The scope of this module permits it to be used in many different learning
situations. The language used recognizes the diverse vocabulary level of students. The lessons
are arranged to follow the standard sequence of the course. But the order in which you read
them can be changed to correspond with the textbook you are now using.
The module is divided into three parts, namely:
After going through this module, you are expected to accomplish the following Most
Essential Learning Competencies:
1. Distinguish a holistic perspective from a partial point of view.
2. Realize the value of doing philosophy in obtaining a broad perspective on life.
3. Do a philosophical reflection on a concrete situation from a holistic
perspective.
6
What I Know
Direction: Choose the letter that corresponds to your answer from the statements
below. Write your answers on other sheet of paper.
______1.It is an activity that requires a person to examine his or her thoughts,
feelings and actions and learn from experience.
A. reflection C. wondering
B. questioning D. reasoning
______2. What is the science and art of correct thinking?
A. Ethics C. Metaphysics
B. Aesthetics D. Logic
______3. The type of philosophical reflection which trains the mind to think
logically. It is also the ability of the mind to construct and evaluate
arguments
A. Secondary reflection C. Primary reflection
B. Tertiary reflection D. all of the above
______4. One of the triumvirate Greek philosophers who pioneered a method of
argument called dialectic.
A. Plato C. Pythagoras
B Socrates D. Aristotle
______5. This is the process of thinking about something in a logical way in order to
form a conclusion or judgement.
C. intuition
A. reasoning
D. reflection
B. proposition
______6. It is a term used to describe a method of philosophical argument that
involves some sort of contradictory process between opposing sides.
A. deductive C. Inductive
B. dialectic D. reflective
______7. It is the idea that various systems (e.g. physical, biological, social) should
be viewed as wholes, not merely as a collection of parts.
A. holism C. existentialism
B. idealism D. rationalism
______8. According to Gabriel Marcel this type of reflection enables us to look
deeper into our experiences and see the bigger picture of reality.
A. Secondary reflection C. Primary reflection
B. Tertiary reflection D. all of the above
______9. The western philosophical tradition originated in______.
A. Greece C. India
B. China D. Egypt
_____10. What is the branch of Philosophy that studies the nature and means of
human knowledge?
A. Metaphysics C. Politics
B. Ethics D. Epistemology
7
Lesson
1 What is Philosophy?
More than 2500 years ago a sage in South Asia named Gautama Buddha declared that
“Life is suffering.” This is the first of his Four Noble Truths. And indeed if you look at your
life you will see that it is a series of challenges that you have to overcome if you want to
survive. It feels like you are competing in a race in which you are required to successfully
jump hurdles in order to win. And each challenge in life is really a question or a bunch of
questions that you have to answer. If you are not feeling well for example you might ask,
Why am I feeling this way (cause)? How can I overcome it (process)? How it will affect
my life and the people around me (consequence)?
Philosophy, our subject matter for this course, is really all about questions
and answers. And since by now you already asked and answered hundreds of
questions your life experienced already prepared you to take our philosophical
journey starting now.
What’s In
Picture Analysis
Direction: Look at the picture below and answer the following questions.
Source: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/driventoabstraction/2018/07/blind-men-elephant-folklore-knowledge/
retrieved May 2020
8
1. What do you notice from the picture?
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Did anyone get the correct answer? Why or why not?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
3. What does this picture imply about our effort to understand the realities
of life or answer our perennial problems?
__________________________________________________________________
______
__________________________________________________________________
______
__________________________________________________________________
______
What’s New
Imagine that a vaccine for Covid -19 is already available and therefore the community
quarantine was lifted throughout the Philippines. Freedom at last! You decided to travel the
country. However during one of your travel adventures you come upon an unfamiliar area and
therefore as much as you hate to admit it you have to accept the truth: you are lost.
Obviously the very first question you want to answer is the
question Where am I? However to answer this question
another question needs answering: How can I discover it? or
9
How do I know it? Should you ask a stranger for directions? Should you consult Google Map?
arrive successfully at
destination.
You might not realize this but you are already doing philosophy when you are
answering these three questions:
-Where am I?
The reason is that these three questions are the primary questions of philosophy.
Let us now turn our attention to philosophy.
10
What is It
DEFINITION OF PHILOSOPHY
Traditionally philosophy is defined as love of wisdom because it came from two
Greek words philos (love) and Sophia (wisdom). You might find it strange to connect
love to philosophy. You might think of philosophy as a purely intellectual discipline
which has nothing to do with love. You might believe love is romance, poetry,
intense passion in which you are willing to lay down your life. But you will see that
philosophy can also be pursued passionately. In fact some people like Socrates died
for truth. It is this centrality of love to philosophy that we call people who engages
in philosophy as philosophers (lovers of wisdom).
ORIGIN OF PHILOSOPHY
PHILOSOPHICAL ACTIVITY
Thales greatest contribution to philosophy is not his identification of water as
the ultimate stuff of the universe. His greatest contribution is the problem he posed
“What is the ultimate stuff of the universe?” and his approach in solving that
11
problem. Studying Thales makes us realize that philosophical activity is
characterized by three things:
BRANCHES OF PHILOSOPHY
Since philosophy’s concern is vast, we have to divide it into different branches.
Each branch will focus on a specific area of philosophy. To understand the
branches of philosophy let us return to the three central philosophical questions
we explored earlier.
12
The second question, How do I know it? concerns the nature of human
knowledge and the way to obtain it. How do we obtain knowledge? Do we obtain
knowledge by revelation, intuition, instinct or reason? Can we achieve certainty or are we
doomed to suffer perpetual doubt? Is knowledge based on the things we perceive or from
something else? This is the concern of epistemology which can be defined as the “branch
of philosophy that studies the nature and means of human knowledge.” We need
epistemology to guide us in knowing since we make mistakes from time to time.
The first two branches of philosophy, metaphysics and epistemology, are called
cognitive branches. These branches provide a description of being (existence) and
knowing. They are the foundations of understanding any philosophical system.
The next three branches of philosophy (ethics, politics and aesthetics) can be
classified as the normative branches of philosophy because they are concerned
with the standard of the good. If the cognitive branches are concerned with what
“is” the normative branches are concerned with what “ought” to be.
The most basic normative branch of philosophy is ethics or morality (I used
this two concepts interchangeably). It is concerned with the last of the three
questions central to philosophy: What should I do? Ethics can be regarded as the
technology of philosophy (I owe this analogy to the philosopher Ayn Rand) because
it tells us how human beings ought to function as a human being. But in order to
describe how human beings ought to act we must first know what a human being
is. These last is provided by metaphysics and epistemology. (This is especially true
of philosophical anthropology a sub-branch of metaphysics which studies the
metaphysical nature of man (see discussion above). Metaphysics and epistemology
are the foundations of ethics.
The last of the normative branch, aesthetics studies the nature of art. It is
concerned with the nature and the objective judgement of beauty.
13
II. Philosophical Tools and Processes
Philosophy as a science is also a systematized body of knowledge but unlike other sciences
which employs observation and experimentation to prove their theories, philosophy uses
reason to arrive at a certain knowledge or truth. At the onset Greek philosophers gave us a
hint on how to use our intellect to understand realities around us. The tools that they
frequently utilized are the following:
Socrates went further not just asking questions for himself but poses questions
to people which is the beginning of series of questions and responses from
participants. This philosophical questioning can be best described from an excerpt
from Plato’s apology of Socrates below:
“…But let us examine each one of the parts of this charge. Now he asserts that
I do injustice by corrupting the young. But I, men of Athens, assert that Meletus
does injustice, in that he jest in a serious matter, easily bringing human beings
into trial, pretending to be serious and concerned about things for which he never
cared at all. That this is so, I will try to display to you as well. Now come here,
Meletus, tell; do you not regard it as most important how the youth will be the best
possible?” (Plato’s apology of Socrates, 24C)
His method is called dialectics. The Socratic Method, also known as method of
elenchus, elenctic method, or Socratic debate, is a form of cooperative
argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering
questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying
presuppositions. (Google.com/search) Aristotle said that it was the pre-
Socratic philosopher Zeno of Elea who invented dialectic, of which the dialogues
of Plato are the examples of the Socratic dialectical method. According to Kant,
however, the ancient Greeks used the word "dialectic" to signify the logic of false
appearance or semblance. Dialectics is a term used to describe a method of
philosophical argument that involves some sort of contradictory process between
opposing sides. As a dialectical method, it is a discourse between two or more
people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to establish the
truth through reasoned arguments.
The above examples show the logical process wherein by reasoning one arrives at a
certain truth or knowledge. Logic starts with the origin of ideas, terms, propositions
or premises, syllogism, etc. These terms are the basic structure of argument.
Unfortunately, this branch of philosophy is equivalent to one-subject requirement
in any course in the tertiary level.
In the midst of our present crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, consistently, the government kept
on reminding us the ‘essentials’ of things and concerns that are necessary during the
quarantine period whether under ECQ, GCQ, or MECQ. In our case, we changed our
competencies and emphasized the most essential ones. This is the essence of philosophy. It
tries to separate the essences of things versus accidentals and necessary versus contingent.
It is concern of what is the substance and ultimate causes of things.
15
Its trajectory is to see the bigger picture about everything. This process is called
philosophical reflection. According to Gabriel Marcel, philosophical reflection is the act
of giving time to think about the meaning and purpose of life. He mentioned two types,
namely: Primary Reflection- which is the ability to think logically. The ability of the mind
to construct and evaluate arguments. It examines its object by abstraction, by analytically
breaking it down into its constituent parts. It is concerned with definitions, essences and
technical solutions to problems. The second type is Secondary reflection. According to
Marcel this type of reflection enables us to look deeper into our experiences and see the
bigger picture of reality. It integrates the fragmented and compartmentalized experience
into a whole. It is the idea that various systems (e.g. physical, biological, social) should be
viewed as wholes, not merely as a collection of parts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holism
In effect we see the broader perspective of life.
16
The line above divides space into two sides: left and right. The left side represents the interior,
subjective, aspect of everything. The right side represents the exterior, objective, aspect of
everything. The interior (or “loob” in Filipino) if applied to human beings, includes one’s values,
dreams, ideas, emotions, beliefs. It basically consists of one’s inner life. It cannot be seen or
measured but can be experienced directly. The exterior side of everything are the things that
we can see, measure and touch. They include the physical objects around us including our own
bodies.
Above the line represents what is singular, individual, one. The space below
represents what is plural, collective, many. For example you are an individual but
you belong in a family, community, class (all instances of the collective).
An interesting thing happen when we combine the two lines.
We created what Wilber calls the quadrants. According to Wilber quadrants are
“the inside and outside of the individual and collective (Wilber 2006).”
17
There are many ways to describe the quadrants. We can use the simple
location of each of the quadrant. So the interior of the individual is the upper left
quadrant (UL), the exterior of the individual is the upper right quadrant (UR), the
interior of the collective is the lower left quadrant (LL) and the exterior of the
collective is the lower right quadrant (LR).
But what we are interested is when we apply this to human beings. The inside
of the individual becomes the mind, the outside of the individual becomes the body,
the inside of the collective becomes culture and the outside of the collective
becomes society.
18
Now when we reflect on the nature of any concrete issue like poverty,
corruption, prostitution, global warming we can just put the issue at the center of
the quadrant and analyzed its mental, physical, cultural and social components.
This is looking at an issue from an all quadrant, multiple and holistic perspective.
Multiple Perspectives
Let’s take for example the issue of poverty. How do we reflect on the issue
using the AQAL framework? Well we know that poverty has a psychological aspect
(UL quadrant) to it. It affects the way we think, feel and even what we value. But it
does not stop there. Poverty also affects bodies (UR quadrant). It affects our
nutrition, our medication and immune system. Some children have stunted growth
due to poverty. And who could deny that poverty also affects the culture such as
arts, religion and even the way we dress. Religious feast such as the procession of
the Black Nazarene is in part motivated by poverty. And of course it is obvious that
poverty has an economic, political and even technological components (all parts of
the social LR quadrant).
POVERTY
19
What’s More
a) Quotation from Plato’s Apology (38a): “The unexamined life is not worth
living.”
3. Write the following terms on your paper: a) day-to-day life, b) reflection, and
c) application
20
What I Have Learned
What I Can Do
Covid-19
pandemic
21
Assessment
Direction: Choose the letter that corresponds to your answer from the statements
below. Write your answers on the sheet of paper.
_____1.It is an activity that requires a person to examine his or her thoughts,
feelings and actions and learn from experience.
A. reflection C. wondering
B. questioning D. reasoning
______2.What is the science and art of correct thinking?
A. Ethics C. Metaphysics
B. Aesthetics D. Logic
______3. The type of philosophical reflection which trains the mind to think
logically. Also it is the ability of the mind to construct and evaluate
arguments
A. Secondary reflection C. Primary reflection
B. Tertiary reflection D. all of the above
______4. One of the triumvirate Greek philosophers who pioneered a method of
argument called dialectic.
A. Plato C. Pythagoras
B. Socrates D. Aristotle
______5. It is considered as the process of thinking about something in a logical
way in order to form a conclusion or judgement.
A. reasoning C. argument
B. Proposition D. Reflection
_____6. In our daily lives we encounter events, situations or issues that we need to
ponder and think deeply. This activity which requires a person to examine
his or her thoughts, feelings and actions and learn from experience is related
to the concept of:
A. philosophical reflection C. philosophical wondering
B. philosophical questioning D. philosophical reasoning
_____7. Imagine that you are in Boracay walking with Thales. He is convincing you
that the only reality is water. Would you believe in him?
A. No, because I had my own belief.
B. Yes, because Thales belongs to the school of monists which believes that
only one kind of stuff exists.
C. Either yes or no, I will have my own investigation that is based on the
data and reason presented.
D. Neither yes nor no until it is proven true.
______8. According to Gabriel Marcel this type of reflection enables us to look
deeper into our experiences and see the bigger picture of reality.
A. Secondary reflection C. Primary reflection
B. Tertiary reflection D. all of the above
22
_____9. Identify which statement describes the difference between holism and
partial thinking.
A. Holism is a perspective that looks at the “big picture” while partial
thinking focuses on the specific aspect of the situation.
B. Holism is a perspective that looks at the specific aspects of the
situation while partial thinking looks at the big picture.
C. Holism requires us to focus on a certain aspect of the problem
while partial thinking requires us to have an open mindset.
D. All of the above
_____10. According to the importance of studying philosophy, what can it offer us?
A. Know the different philosophers and their philosophies in life?
B. See the downs and lows in the development and history of philosophy.
C. Survey the achievements of the different philosophers in various
periods of history.
D. Enhances our minds, understand what we encounter every day, and
value our judgement.
Additional Activities
a. “Covid-19 pandemic”
b. “New Normal” culture
Simple/silly
Serious Questions Deep Questions
Questions
1. 1. 1.
2. 2. 2.
3. 3. 3.
23
References
Books
Jones, W. T. (1969). The Classical Mind. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich
Inc.
Peikoff, L. (1991). Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York Dutton.
Stumpf, S.E. and Fieser J. (2008). Socrates To Sartre And Beyond. New York,
N.Y.: Mc Graw Hill
Websites
24