Jaquith_MJ19
Jaquith_MJ19
Supports Equity
Strategies to encourage progress
instead of measuring what’s
already known
By Ann Jaquith
I
n education, assessments are often used to did not require writing or extended
evaluate what students have learned—to problem-solving.
sort, rank, or judge students based upon an The damage was especially evident in
evaluation of performance. Standardized schools serving large populations of his-
state tests and those administered by the College torically marginalized and disadvantaged
Board are examples of assessments of learning. children, where students spent more time
In the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) era preparing for multiple-choice tests. In
and its aftermath, however, educators called Next Generation Assessment, Moving Beyond
attention to the damage done by the nation’s the Bubble Test, Linda Darling-Hammond
persistent focus on assessments of learning. One describes how NCLB narrowed the cur-
concern is that repeated poor performance riculum by using tests for consequential
eroded students’ belief in their own capabili- decision-making, which “can drive curricu-
ties to learn. Another is that such high-stakes lum and instruction in ways that mimic both
assessments reduced opportunities to learn. the content and the form of the test.”
The high-stakes nature of the tests, along with Darling-Hammond argues that being able to
the strict timelines to test every student, every answer multiple-choice questions does not mean
year, meant schools spent an inordinate amount students have the ability to answer the same
of time preparing for tests that consisted of questions in open-ended form. She offers evi-
multiple-choice or short-answer questions that dence that “a focus on multiple-choice testing
were less expensive to score, and consequently, gives false assurances about what students know
and are able to do, not only on other tests, but common. They are classroom-based. They are
more importantly, in the real world.” used during instruction. They involve students
Schools that performed less well on these in the assessment process, and in so doing, help
high-stakes accountability tests tended to give students take charge of their own learning.
students a steadier diet of instruction that Two common practices used in assessment for
mimicked the multiple-choice tests. As a result, learning are student self-assessment and student
students in lower-performing schools often peer feedback routines. By providing students
had fewer opportunities to write, conduct with specific information about their learning
research, make oral arguments, or reason with and a clear description of the desired learning
evidence than students in higher-performing goal, students are better able to know what they
schools—and, consequently, were less prepared need to do. This can help students experience
for situations prevalent in daily life that require greater success.
complex reasoning, weighing alternatives, and Receiving information that helps one learn
thinking deeply. can contribute to a positive self-image and
Concerned educators and citizens have confidence as a student, particularly for those
demanded for decades that more attention be accustomed to experiencing repeated failure
paid to another type of assessment—assess- in classrooms. When effectively used, assess-
ments for learning. Unlike standardized tests, ments for learning can be an important lever for
this form of assessment promotes learning, reducing persistent gaps in achievement.
rather than evaluating it. What is assessment for
learning, and how does it differ from the more Providing Useful Feedback
typical assessments of learning? Knowing specifically what to do to improve
hinges on the quality of the feedback received.
The Features of “For” The best assessments for learning generate
Assessments for learning can take many forms, specific feedback about the learner, how the
but they tend to have important features in learner approaches a particular task, and steps