Scribd
Upload
16 views

SA . Comments - Copy

Uploaded by

engmaar201037
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views

SA . Comments - Copy

Uploaded by

engmaar201037
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Item

6
7

10

11

12

13

14

15
16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34
35
36
Observation

In 15% design & Procurement audit reports the Minor NC Ref 1682/1639 was closed
without objective evidence in March 2024 however, the supporting documents
were signed in July 2024.

Moreover, Engineering PQI and delayed reasons where not addressed properly
during external audit reporting, as well as no nonconformity was issued for
engineering PQI not conducted since beginning of the project.

The Purpose and Scope of QMR needs to be revised or re-write.

The QC Manager is not mobilized to project which violating requirement of


Schedule Q para 5.3 and no notification is issued from company.

Improper communication between Contractor and Company representative which


is clearly demonstrated in non-signed documents.

The approved batch plant and mix design information is missing from MQMR

The RTR Pipe Works (nonmetallic installation procedure) was not approved and
Contractor already demobilized the RTR QC and have only 9 RFI’s raised for
inspection.
The PQPs revisions (including Organization charts) are not approved by Company.

The TWLA is not provided in MQMR # 11 & 12.

Technical Query log is not attached to all MQMR.

Engineering PQI data is not available in all MQMRs.

PQI data are not available in MQMRs # 9 & 10

The submitted revisions of PQP is not submitted within 21 days after the effective
date of Contract (February 2023) and Subsequent submittals to COMPANY within
seven (7) calendar days for any significant changes and no notification is issued
from company.

The risk register in PQP appendix 04 is not addressing the requirements of ISO
9001:2015.

The attached ISO 9001:2015 certificate was expired on June 21, 2024

Contractor attached unrelated attachments to the PQP instead of list of these


documents

AFI – unnecessary and misleading the leader.


PQCS is not available in the organization chart in MQMR # 9 & 10.

Management review results are not submitted within 14 days for MRM-01 without
any violation from company.

MRM-02 was delayed for 2 months without any justification and violation from
company.

Planned and overall project progress is not reflected in the MQMRs.

Materials and equipment preservation status and logs are not included in the QMR.

The heat treatment procedure is not included in the list of QMS procedures in PQP.

Underground non-metallic procedures and installer qualifications are not included


in the PQP and company did not issue any violation.

The attached Organization chart in MQMRs is not reflecting Materials/Equipment


Receiving Inspector per discipline and without control and revision number Exhibit I
Of Attachment VI to Schedule Q

The attached INCR Log in MQMR September 2024, INCR-PTJ-QC-CIV-001, shows


that a root cause analysis for the identified non-conformities is not define the
causes of damage.
The attached Organization chart in MQMR does not show the reporting relationship
to above level the contractor project manager and no internal and external lines of
communication includes subcontractor, supplier (third party service providers) and
between contractor and company

Contractor did not submit any customer satisfaction to determine and evaluate the
degree of COMPANY’s satisfaction through quarterly evaluation of COMPANY
assessments.

Contractor did not attach or develop the training program to introduce and
familiarize all CONTRACTOR and sub-contractor personnel with the project quality
requirements for their area of responsibility for every month.

Geotechnical Engineering report conducted for the Project does not bear
Geotechnical File number.

Request For Approval (RFA) Appendix A was not submitted to Quality Team
supervisor for Concrete Mix Design approval.

Tanks F-9063 and F-9064 Ring beam was constructed based on an "Issued for
Approval" (IFA) drawings, rather than a fully approved design (IFC).

The absence of the Reinforcing bars schedule and bending details IFC (Issued for
Construction) is missing nor issued by engineering.

Fabrication and bending were conducted on Site fabrication not meeting the
requirements.

Source of supply for backfill materials does not have approval from PMT/PID.

Bund walls for Tank 9063-9066 foundation details, Structural fill compacted
thickness below foundation shown on the IFC is only 400 mm not meeting the
requirement.
Control of drawings is given instructions in writing by Contractor and PMT.
Contractor shall adhere to Field Engineering change procedure.
The protective coating on the ring wall foundation started flaking due to direct
sunlight exposure.
Reference

ISO 9001:2015.

General

Schedule Q para 5.3

Schedule Q

Sch-Q para 7.7

SAEP-407
Schedule Q para 5.12.

Schedule-Q para 1.6 of Attachment IV.

Sch-Q para 7.7.1. d

PQP appendix 03

PQP appendix 03

Schedule Q attachment V.

ISO 9001:2015 Para 6.1

PQP

Schedule Q attachment IV para 2.1


Schedule Q Exhibit I Of Attachment VI

Schedule Q para 4.2

Schedule Q para 4.1

Schedule Q section 7.7.1

Schedule Q Attachment IV para 6.

Schedule Q attachment IV para 2.1

Schedule Q attachment IV para 2.1

Schedule Q Exhibit I Of Attachment VI

Schedule Q Section 7.5.4


Schedule Q Section 5.12

Schedule Q Section 7.2 and ISO 9001: 2015

Schedule Q Section 5.15 and ISO 9001: 2015

SAES-A-113 Sec. 11.1 & SAES-Q-303

SAEP-1152

SAEP-343

SAES-Q-001 Sec. 8.12.1 - 8.12.8

SAES-Q-001 Sec. 8.12.1 - 8.12.8 & ASTM A775/A775M-22

SAES-A-114 - Sec. 6.1

SAES-A-114 Sec. 6.3.1.1 and SAES-Q-303.


Field Engineering change procedure

SAES-H-200
CONTRCTOR REPLY

Kindly re review the document as the dates of the reports to close the
NCR are combatable with the sequance of the closure.

Noted and wiil be reflected on the new QMR

New candidate CV will be submitted to Company as releaver till


mobolization of the approved QC manager

Noted . All doument will be checked and signed pirior to submit .

Noted and wiil be reflected on the new QMR

this activity was in an existing damadged RTR line not in the project
so contractor provided a temporary RTR QCI for repairing the line
through those 9 RFI’s only.
The New Revised in next January 2025 will be reviewed and signed
for approval by Company

It was attached speratelly not included the QMR

It was attached speratelly not included the QMR

Noted and wiil be reflected on the new QMR

it is already consedered from 11 and forward

already the situation was remedied, the PQP was issued, work began
and it was updated to (Rev 4)

The New Revised in next January 2025 will include the risk register in
PQP

Refer to the attached updated one .

Noted and wiil be reflected on the new PQP


already updated in November QMR

The first time the meeting was held without the presence of the
company's Quality Control Manager. Therefore, the meeting was
repeated and the deadline for sending the report was remedied.

The first time the meeting was held without the presence of the
company's Quality Control Manager. Therefore, the meeting was
repeated and the deadline for sending the report was remedied.

Noted and wiil be reflected on the new QMR

noted and well be emplemented

The New Revised in next January 2025 will be added The heat
treatment procedure

PMDR is apart of PQP and it is included Underground non-metallic


procedures and installer qualifications

well noted, as it will be reflected in the Organization

INCR log in the MQMR is only for each month individually and the
mentioned INCR was in defferent month.
it was updated and once we have new subcontractor will be
reflected

will notify the management to request the company evaluation

THE COMPANY response is required

to be arranged with PMT for comunication

shall be submitted from PMT to QC supervisor of the Company

the drawing was approved with comment through official transmittal


see the attached

enigineering department was notified to proceed the bars schedule


and bending details and it will be submitted to company as soon as
possible .

fabrication was done on site meeting the requirements of SAES-Q-001


Sec. 8.12.1 - 8.12.8 & ASTM A775/A775M-22 and all are inspected by
approved RFI's

MSA will be submitted to PMT for approval and the material was
tested and found follow the requirements .

engineering was notified to modify the drawing and it will be submitted


to company as soon as possible .
THE COMPANY response is required

any flaking it will be repaired immediatelly and backfilled as soon as


possible

You might also like