Visual Imagery

Maryam Maqsood 01-171222-080

Adeena Saif 01-171222-086

Hajira Azhar 01-171222-024

Laiba Khan 01-171222-036

Hina Akram 01-171222-082

Department of Professional Psychology, Bahria University

Cognitive Psychology

Ms. Hina Ghafoor

5th December 2024

 Visual Imagery and Its Relevance in Cognitive Psychology

Mental pictures or sensory experiences that take place in the absence of direct

external stimuli are referred to as visual imagery. These pictures enable people to remember

or conjure up visions of things, locations, or occasions that are not yet visible. Given its

importance in memory, decision-making, and problem-solving, visual imagery is a

fundamental aspect of cognitive psychology.

Importance in Cognitive Processes like Memory, Learning, and Problem-Solving

Several cognitive processes are significantly impacted by visual imagery. By forming

vivid mental images of information, it makes encoding and retrieval easier in memory.

Visualizing information helps people remember things better, according to studies, which

makes it an effective learning tool. Visual imagery in problem-solving enables people to

mentally navigate various scenarios and model possible solutions. Making judgments is aided

by this mental simulation, particularly when weighing several options or picturing situations.

Role of Visual Imagery (VI) in Cognitive Processes

Learning and Recognition

Visual imagery helps in the improvement of learning as it produces mental pictures

that help strengthen memory retention and retrieval. Students who can visualize concepts or

scenarios can store information better and recall it with more ease. Visual cues can help one

recognize and identify information through associating mental images with previously

learned material, thereby enhancing the accuracy of recall. It is a very common educational

practice used to enhance the comprehension and retention of new material.

Problem-Solving and Decision-Making

Visual imagery is a powerful facilitator of problem-solving and decision-making.

Visualization of various scenarios, relationships, and potential outcomes helps one

conceptually formulate solutions. Such thought preparation enhances the refinement of tactics

and the weighing of repercussions for alternative choices. The same principle in decision-

making better choices are made through visualization of different outcomes and scenario

simulation helps solve a problem better.

Emotional Regulation

Visualization techniques are often employed to regulate emotions. For example,

visualizing calming images or future success can help individuals manage stress and anxiety.

Mental imagery allows people to shift their focus from current stressors to more positive or

relaxing scenarios, promoting emotional well-being. By imagining peaceful environments or

desired outcomes, individuals can enhance their emotional resilience and relaxation.

How Visual Imagery Differs from Person-to-Person

Individuals think differently.

Visual thinkers rely on detailed mental images, which often generate vivid, image-like

representations of the information. Verbal thinkers might "see" less detail and use words or

abstract patterns to conceptualize ideas. For example, if asked to visualize "a busy city," a

visual thinker may picture actual scenes—tall skyscrapers, crowded streets—while a verbal

thinker might focus on the idea of activity and movement without an actual image.

Personality Traits

• Openness to Experience: The minds of imaginative and creative people are very more

imaginative and abstract with definite, logical elements.

 • Conscientiousness: People with this trait may focus on structured, organized mental

images with clear and defined components.

• Neuroticism: Individuals with neurotic tendencies might generate mental imagery

associated with high levels of emotional arousal, creating more imaginations of

negative or anxiety-provoking visuals.

Example: When visualizing a "storm," a neurotic person might be concerned with chaos

and devastation, whereas an individual low in neuroticism might envision the beauty of

lightning.

Sensory Perception

Differences in sensory processing also influence the development of mental images.

An individual with acute color perception might imagine vividly the colors of a mental

image, while an individual with color blindness might focus on shapes or texture. Some may

combine their visual imagery to include some touch, sound, or even smells.

Experience and Memories

Past experiences drive mental imagery. One who is brought up next to a beach might

picture very detailed waves and sandy dunes when somebody says "beach", while another,

who might not have the experience at all, could envision a mundane blue horizon.Traumatic

or emotional experiences can also affect how imagery is constructed. For example, a specific

shade of red might evoke danger or fear in someone who has experienced a traumatic event

involving that color.

Cultural and Social Factors

Cultural upbringing influences how visual symbols are understood and imagined.

Example: White represents purity in some cultures and mourning in others, thereby

influencing the mental imagery created by the idea of a "white dress."

Shared Knowledge and Beliefs:

Groups with the same religious or societal background tend to interpret images in the

same way; however, the variations in cultures result in different mental images.

Example: A dove could represent peace to one group and simply a bird to another.

Effectiveness of Imagery Perspectives in Sports Training

Study Focus:

This study examines how the use of different types of mental imagery—internal (first-

person perspective) and external (third-person perspective)—affects motor learning and

athletic performance.

Method:

Participants: Athletes were divided into groups, each trained using either internal or external

imagery techniques.

Training Scenarios: Athletes practiced tasks such as:

Precision-based activities (e.g., aiming or shooting).

Learning new physical movements (e.g., dance routines or gymnastic sequences).

Refining motor skills requiring coordination.

Findings:

External Imagery: Athletes imagining themselves performing tasks as if observed by a

third party (external perspective) showed greater improvement in acquiring new motor skills.

This approach likely provides a clearer view of technique and movement patterns.

Internal Imagery: While effective for reinforcing familiar skills or managing anxiety,

internal imagery was less effective for learning new tasks, possibly due to its focus on

subjective sensations rather than objective mechanics.

The perspective of imagery significantly impacts training outcomes. External imagery

is particularly advantageous for learning new tasks that demand precision and technique

refinement, while internal imagery is better suited for improving existing skills or building

confidence. Coaches and athletes can leverage these insights to tailor mental training

strategies for optimal results.

Development of Visual Imagery:

The work of different psychologists related to the field of cognitive and

Developmental psychology has shaped our understanding about how visual imagery

developsover time.

Birth till 2 years: sensorial experience

By this age, babies tend to discover the whole world using their senses. As infants

become interested in the physical environment around them, and are beginning to identify

basic figures, colors, and movements within that environment, visual thinking at this point is

very primal and mainly based on sensorial experience. They begin associating images with

objects and people.

2 to 6 years: need prompts or cues

 Children begin to recognize and name objects and can recall familiar images from

memory. They can also recognize patterns, colors, and simple visual features. The imagery is

still concrete and closely tied to real-life experiences. They may imagine a toy they saw

earlier in the day but typically need prompts or cues to form images.

6 to 12 years: more flexible mental imagery

As children enter school, they start to develop more abstract thinking. They become

more capable of forming mental images that are less tied to direct sensory experiences and

can represent objects and ideas they haven't seen recently. They can mentally rotate images,

imagine future events and visualize scenarios they haven't directly experienced. Their mental

imagery becomes more flexible.

12 to 18 years: highly detailed and elaborate

Teenagers and young adults develop a more refined ability for abstract thinking,

problem-solving, and planning. Imagery becomes more detailed and can include abstract

concepts (e.g., imagining a future event or a solution to a complex problem). They can form

elaborate visualizations that may involve combinations of objects, people, or hypothetical

scenarios, such as imagining a hypothetical world or visualizing success in a particular task.

18 years onward: able to manipulate and highly specialized based on field.

In adulthood, visual imagery can become highly specialized, especially for individuals

who practice visual tasks (e.g., artists, architects, engineers). Adults can form highly detailed

and vivid mental images, often with the ability to manipulate these images mentally. For

example, they may mentally rotate objects, visualize spatial relationships in design, or recall

fine details from memory. Expertise in specific areas can lead to highly refined imagery

relevant to that field (e.g., artists can visualize intricate details of their work). In young

adulthood, the ability to form mental images is at its peak. Visual imagery tends to decline

much more precipitously in older adulthood. Such decline can be attributed to age-related

changes in the brain.

Brain Regions Supporting Visual Imagery

1. Occipital Lobe (Primary Visual Cortex)

• Role in Imagery: It is activated during mental imagery tasks, even in the absence of

visual input.

• Potential Problems:

• Loss of Vividness in Imagery: Mental images may become less vivid or detailed.

• Visual Agnosia: It is the inability to recognize or mentally visualize objects, even

when a person is familiar with them.

• Aphantasia: Severe damage can cause aphantasia, where individuals cannot form

mental images at all.

• Difficulty with Visual Recall: Struggles to recreate previously seen visual scenes

or objects.

2. Parietal Lobe

• Role in Imagery: Supports spatial transformations and mental manipulation of

images, such as mentally rotating objects or imagining spatial layouts.

• Potential Problems:

Spatial Neglect: Failure to visualize or attend to one side of an image (often seen

in right hemisphere damage).

Impaired Mental Rotation: Difficulty imagining or rotating objects in the mind.

3. Temporal Lobes

• Role in Imagery: It facilitates recognition and categorization in mental images.

• Potential Problems:

Impaired Object Recognition: Inability to distinguish between similar objects in

mental images.
 Difficulty with Scene Reconstruction: Struggles to visualize complex scenes or

environments.

Face Blindness (Prosopagnosia): Inability to mentally visualize or recognize faces.

4. Posterior Cingulate Cortex (PCC)

• Role in Imagery: Links imagery with emotions and past experiences and self-

referential thought.

• Potential Problems:

Reduced Emotional Vividness: Imagery may feel detached or lack personal

relevance.

Difficulty Visualizing Personal Scenarios: Trouble imagining oneself in specific

situations or events.

5. Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Supplementary Motor Areas

• Role in Imagery: Supports mental simulation and dynamic changes in imagery.

It also helps mentally simulate movements or interactions within a visualized

scene.

• Potential Problems:

Reduced Mental Manipulation: Difficulty imagining movement or transformations

in mental images.

Static Imagery: Mental images may feel fixed or inflexible.

Effects of Cognitive Impairment on Visual Imagery:

Neurological Disorders and Brain Injuries: Brain damage

Damage to certain parts of the brain, like the occipital cortex or parietal lobes, can lead to

a lack of ability to perform visual imagery, including spatial reasoning and the ability to
visualize objects or scenes. Cerebral Visual Impairment is usually the result of such

damage and affects the processing and interpretation of visual information. It is a

neurological disorder in which the brain fails to process visual information although the eyes

appear normal. It’s more common in children and can happen before, during, or after birth

due to oxygen deprivation, premature birth, infections, or genetic conditions. Stroke:

Sudden, focal injury to brain regions; affects some visual imagery tasks such as navigation

or remembering spatial configurations. Traumatic Brain Injury; Diffuse or focal damage

of the brain, disrupting spatial thinking and dynamic mental pictures, more so physically.

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s can also cause damage to the networks

of the brain that it uses to generate and handle visual mental images. That can affect

performance in some everyday tasks such as navigation and recognizing familiar

environments.

Developmental Disorders: ASD & ADHD

It is possible that visual imagery may be affected differently in ASD. People with

ASD tend to do well with concrete visualizations as images are highly detailed

of an object or scene. Abstract visualizations-which require hypothetical scenarios

or conceptual abstractions-might be more difficult to do. This is because of their

poor ability to process complex or symbolic visual information.

Visual imagery impairment is seen in ADHD due to its interference with core cognitive

functions such as attention, working memory, or executive function. ADHD people just

cannot hold their concentration upon any mental image or material and thus make it utterly

impossible to generate a mental image of anything or hold any mental vision for a relatively

long period in their minds. Besides, working memory is impaired in ADHD. Human beings

need to keep several pieces of information and manipulate these representations. This means

it will not even be possible to vividly imagine complex scenes or abstract ideas without it.

Additionally, their deficits in executive functions can weaken the ability to maintain ordered
and sequenced visual images of their mental imagery. They, therefore, are bound to become

helpless in applying this way of mental imagery for successful accomplishment of tasks in

daily tasks or problem-solving.

Dual-Coding Theory Verbal codes & Non-verbal codes

The Dual-Coding Theory, proposed by Allan Paivio, suggests that verbal and non-

verbal systems collaborate to process and store information. Verbal codes handle linguistic

elements, while non-verbal codes focus on images and spatial relationships. For example,

recalling a word like "apple" may involve both its linguistic representation and an image of

the fruit. This dual-system framework underscores how humans use a combination of

conceptual knowledge and sensory inputs to create vivid mental representations (Pearson,

2006).

Mental Imagery Debate propositional and analog representations

The debate over mental imagery revolves around two central perspectives:

In day-to-day scenarios, the debate between propositional and analog representations comes

into play. For instance, when planning a vacation, imagining a sunny beach (analog) might

coexist with abstract thoughts like "relaxation" or "adventure" (propositional). This duality

demonstrates how abstract and sensory representations merge in practical decision-making

1. Propositional Representations: These abstract codes represent information in a

language-like format, emphasizing logical structures and relationships.

2. Analog Representations: This view posits that mental imagery is akin to perception,

relying on picture-like depictions of the external world.

 Research suggests that both representations coexist within the brain, supporting diverse

cognitive tasks. Studies in cognitive neuroscience reveal that semantic memory—conceptual

knowledge stored in distinct brain areas—plays a significant role in enabling these processes

(Binder & Desai, 2011).

Neurocognitive Basis

Neuroimaging studies have consistently shown that visual imagery activates brain

regions also involved in perception, such as the primary visual cortex and the occipital lobe.

Unlike perception, which relies on bottom-up sensory inputs, visual imagery employs top-

down processes driven by memory and attention. For instance, when imagining a sunset, the

brain reconstructs stored images, guided by the frontal and parietal cortices, to create a vivid

internal experience (Goel & Dolan, 2000; Kandel et al., 2013). When we imagine a favorite

dish, like a steaming bowl of pasta, the brain engages areas such as the visual cortex and

olfactory centers. These areas simulate not just the appearance but the smell and texture of

the meal. Such examples highlight how imagery involves sensory and conceptual integration,

as shown in neuroimaging studies (Binder & Desai, 2011).

Mechanisms of Visual Imagery

Role of the Visual Cortex

The visual cortex is central to generating and sustaining visual imagery.

Neuroimaging studies using fMRI demonstrate overlapping neural activity in the visual

cortex during both actual perception and mental imagery. This overlap suggests that imagery

employs a simulation mechanism, reactivating sensory areas to reconstruct past experiences

or envision novel scenarios (Pearson, 2006; Irish & Piguet, 2013).

 Evidence from lesion studies further highlights the critical role of the visual cortex.

Patients with damage to the visual cortex often report diminished imagery vividness,

reinforcing the idea that this region is indispensable for detailed visual reconstructions. The

visual cortex plays a key role in creating mental pictures. A relatable example is recalling a

friend's face when you hear their name. Neuroimaging studies reveal that such recall activates

the same visual areas that process real faces (Pearson, 2006). This demonstrates how the

visual cortex reconstructs stored images to aid social interactions.

Neural Overlap Between Perception and Imagery

Visual imagery and perception share common neural substrates, particularly in the

occipital lobe and higher-level visual areas. However, imagery relies more heavily on top-

down cognitive control mechanisms facilitated by the prefrontal cortex. This distinction

explains why imagery is less detailed and stable compared to direct perception (Madridge,

2017).For example, studies using TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) have shown that

disrupting activity in the visual cortex affects both perception and imagery, albeit in different

ways. This evidence underscores the shared, yet distinct pathways involved in these processes.

Top-Down Processes in Visual Imagery

Top-down processes, which involve the deliberate reconstruction of mental images,

are crucial for generating imagery. Unlike perception, where sensory input flows from

external stimuli to the brain, imagery relies on stored memories and conceptual frameworks.

This process is orchestrated by the prefrontal and parietal cortices, which integrate semantic

and episodic memories to form coherent visualizations (Binder & Desai, 2011). For instance,

imagining a novel object, like a unicorn, requires combining semantic knowledge of animals

with creative extrapolation, illustrating the brain's capacity for abstraction and synthesis.
 Functions and Evidence Supporting Visual Imagery

Memory enhancement

Mnemonics is a technique which uses visuals to correlate knowledge with what you

already know. By associating information with vivid mental images, we strengthen neural

connections and make it simpler to recall later.it involve:

Method of Loci:

Visualizing information can improve memory. If you want to remember a grocery

list,picture each item in a specific location in your kitchen.

Spatial Reasoning and Navigation

Spatial thinking refers to the ability to mentally visualize and manipulate items and

their spatial relationships. It's like having a built-in GPS system in your mind. For example:

Imagine searching a library for a particular book. You may be able to picture the library's

structure, its various departments, and the general placement of the volumes you're trying to

find. You can move through the library more effectively with the help of this mental map.

Skill acquisition

Skill acquisition is the process of learning new skills whether cognitive skill like

problem solving or physical ability like playing an instrument. Mental practice is a common

strategy used by athletes to enhance performance. Learning and improving their technique

becomes easier by their ability to see themselves performing a skill flawlessly.

Creative thinking

Visual imagery is crucial for creative thought. Visualizing different ideas and

thoughts allows us to explore unique solutions and produce innovative ideas.

Mind Mapping:

A visual method for organizing thoughts and ideas, for example a painter may

visualize his painting before making it.

Daydreaming

type of mental imagery that can lead to creative thinking and problem solving, for

example visualizing different solutions for a problem and their potential outcomes.

Behavioral Experiments: Mental Rotation tasks Correlation b/w degree of rotation and time taken

Roger N. Shepard and Jacqueline Metzler did seminal research on mental rotation in

1971. They showed participants pairs of 3D objects that were rotated at different angles.

Participants were asked to identify whether the two objects were identical or mirror

reflections of one another.

Key findings:

• Linear Relationship between Rotation Angle and Reaction Time: Shepard and Metzler

discovered a strong positive association between the angle of rotation and the time

participants took to decide. This implies that participants mentally spin the objects,

with the time required increasing with the degree of rotation.

• Mental Imagery: A Process Their research offered significant evidence that mental

imagery exists and has a role in cognitive it shows that individuals can mentally

manipulate and transform the visual images.

Neuroimaging Studies: fMRI Evidence

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies have provided strong

evidence supporting the brain foundation of visual perception. When individuals perform

mental imagery brain areas associated with visual perception, such as the visual cortex, are
active. This overlap in neuronal activity shows that the brain processes mental images and

real-world sensory experiences in the same way. For example, when a person imagines a

familiar face, the same brain areas are active as when they view that face.

Limitations of Mental Imagery:

A painter without a canvas, a writer without words, or a navigator without a map: That’s

what visual imagery can feel like when its limitations come into play. There are numerous

challenges that make this mental masterpiece a little more complex than it seems. Some of

them are:

1. Aphantasia: (Absence of Mind’s eye)

In the 1880s, British psychologist Sir Francis Galton first identified that some individuals

possess no ability to visualize, describing their “power of visualization as zero.” This

condition, known as aphantasia, is characterized by the inability to form mental images. It is

estimated to affect about 1% to 4% of the population, though many remain unaware of it until

they realize others literally “see” mental images, rather than speaking metaphorically.

Importantly, the absence of visual imagery in aphantasia does not equate to a lack of

creativity or imagination. Individuals with aphantasia can conceptualize abstract ideas,

emotions, or concepts without forming vivid mental pictures. Their creativity may lean

toward logical reasoning, problem-solving, or emotional understanding instead of visualizing

specific scenes or objects.

2. Hyperphantasia:

Hyperphantasia, the ability to create highly vivid and detailed mental images, can feel

like a superpower, but it comes with notable limitations. The intensity of these visualizations

can lead to emotional overload, as reliving vivid memories, especially negative ones which
may amplify anxiety or stress. Hyperphantasia may also hinder abstract thinking, favoring

vivid visual details over broader, conceptual ideas. For instance, while someone with

hyperphantasia might excel in creative storytelling, they may struggle with tasks requiring

abstract reasoning or focusing on the big picture.

3. Subjective Nature:

Studies indicate that vivid mental imagery can blur the distinction between imagination

and reality, occasionally resulting in false memories. In one experiment, participants were

prompted to imagine objects and later identify whether they had actually seen them or merely

visualized them. Individuals with highly vivid mental imagery frequently misremember

imagined objects as real. This happened because brain regions like the prefrontal cortex,

which are responsible for distinguishing reality, struggled to differentiate between perceived

and imagined experiences. Another example, an eyewitness might inadvertently “recall”

crime scene details based on imagined elements, potentially leading to inaccuracies in critical

cases.

4. Cognitive Overload:

Creating and maintaining mental images can be cognitively demanding, particularly

for abstract or complex tasks. This strain can decrease focus and impair problem-solving

abilities. For instance, mentally rotating three-dimensional objects is especially difficult.

A Harvard study tested participants on mental rotation tasks with 3D shapes and found

that as the required rotation angle increased (e.g., 50°, 100°, or 150°), participants

experienced greater cognitive strain, leading to reduced accuracy and slower reaction

times.
5. Over-Reliance:

Excessive dependence on mental imagery without taking concrete action can hinder

progress toward achieving goals. For example, athletes who focus solely on mental rehearsal

without incorporating physical training may fail to perform at their best.

6. Risk in Therapy:

In therapeutic contexts, guided imagery can inadvertently lead to the formation of false

memories or strengthen negative beliefs. Ethical challenges emerge when visualization is

applied as a superficial solution without addressing underlying psychological concerns. For

instance, a therapist attempting to use visualization to help a patient overcome trauma might

unintentionally contribute to the creation of a distorted memory of the traumatic event.

Applications:

Cognitive Psychology

In cognitive psychology, visualization is vital for memory enhancement and problem-

solving. The method of loci, an ancient mnemonic technique, involves creating mental

“Memory palaces” by linking information to specific imagined locations, significantly

boosting recall. Similarly, visualizing various approaches to problems aids in generating

creative solutions, commonly applied in fields like mathematics and engineering.

Sports Psychology

Sports psychology highlights the impact of visualization on athletic performance.

Mental rehearsal, where athletes vividly imagine performing their sport, enhances physical

performance by refining movements, boosting confidence, and fostering mental readiness.

This technique involves fully experiencing success in the mind seeing, feeling, and hearing it

before competing.

Clinical Psychology

Visualization strategies are an essential component of many interventions of CBT in

clinical psychology. For example, guided imagery is used to help clients reduce stress, cope

with tension, and resolve emotional problems. A therapist may employ imagery techniques

toassist reframe painful memories or lead a client through a relaxing visualization exercise

to lower anxiety. These methods can be very effective in treating phobias and disorders like

post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Health Psychology

The power of visualization is also used in health psychology to treat pain and promote

recovery. Visualization techniques are frequently given to patients who are undergoing

medical operations or who are experiencing chronic pain in order to help them cope. People

can occasionally experience lower pain levels and better recovery outcomes by visualizing

the healing process or a pain-free existence. The significant impact that our emotional states

can have on our physical health is shown by this mind-body connection.

Future Direction

Visual imagery is going through a radical change, especially after the developments in

neurotechnology and artificial intelligence (AI). These developments also highlight

applications and difficulties across a variety of domains.

Positive aspects:

• In order to enable machines to "see" what a human imagines, artificial intelligence (AI)

methods such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) are being utilized to reconstruct
 visual imagery from brain activity. The ability to convert brain signals into visuals, for

example, has been shown in research on brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). This

development could help people with paralysis or disabilities by providing them with

additional visual communication options.

• Virtual reality (VR) and AI-powered therapy have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in

the treatment of mental health issues. Research shows that by simulating and processing

traumatic events in controlled environments, virtual reality (VR)-based exposure therapy

successfully lessens PTSD symptoms. Additionally, it has been successful in managing

phobias, such as spider or height phobias, by enabling patients to face their concerns in a

secure manner. Virtual reality simulations also assist people with autism or social anxiety

practice positive behaviors in realistic settings, which increases their confidence. These

resources are very helpful for increasing the accessibility and customization of mental

health care, especially in underprivileged communities.

• Tools that merge AI and mental imagery have the potential to completely transform

education. Students can visually investigate abstract ideas, such modelling 3D chemical

structures, by using VR or AI.

Negative Aspects:

• One drawback is the potential for AI to completely replace human imagination and

creativity. In the same way that reliance on GPS has weakened our spatial navigation

skills, this dependence may impair the brain's innate capacity to visualize and understand

abstract concepts

• AI-generated images could unintentionally contain biases or mistakes, particularly if they

were trained on faulty datasets. This could result in inaccurate depictions of mental states,

making psychological diagnoses or therapies more difficult. For instance, an AI system

trained on a dataset lacking diversity in cultural expressions of emotions might

Misinterpret a client's facial expressions or body language. If a system associates certain

behaviors with anxiety or depression based on a biased dataset, it could misdiagnose

individuals from underrepresented groups.

 References

Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions:

Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65–94.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65

Bedford, F. L. (2011). A perception theory in mind–body medicine: guided imagery and

mindful meditation as cross-modal adaptation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,

19(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0166-x

Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in

Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001

Collins, M. P., & Dunn, L. F. (2005). The effects of meditation and visual imagery on an

immune system disorder: dermatomyositis. The Journal of Alternative and

Complementary Medicine, 11(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.275

Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2003). The role of visual imagery in the

enhanced cognitive interview: guided questioning techniques and individual

differences. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1(1), 33–51.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.6

Di Bernardi Luft, C., Zioga, I., Banissy, M. J., & Bhattacharya, J. (2019). Spontaneous visual

imagery during meditation for creating visual art: An EEG and Brain stimulation case

study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00210

Farah, M. J. (1984). The neurological basis of mental imagery: A componential analysis.

Cognition, 18(1–3), 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(84)90026-x

Hu, C., Lin, Z., Zhang, N., & Ji, L. (2024). AI-empowered imagery writing: integrating AI-

generated imagery into digital mental health service. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1434172
Irish, M., & Piguet, O. (2013). The pivotal role of semantic memory in remembering the past

and imagining the future. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00027

Krause, D., Richert, B., & Weigelt, M. (2021). Neurophysiology of embodied mental

rotation: Event‐related potentials in a mental rotation task with human bodies as

compared to alphanumeric stimuli. European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(4), 5384–

5403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15383

MSEd, K. C. (2024, May 20). What It's Like to Have Aphantasia. Verywell Mind.

https://www.verywellmind.com/aphantasia-overview-4178710

Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). Mental imagery:

functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,

19(10), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003

Shafir, T., Taylor, S. F., Atkinson, A. P., Langenecker, S. A., & Zubieta, J. (2013). Emotion

regulation through execution, observation, and imagery of emotional movements.

Brain and Cognition, 82(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.03.001

Stephan-Otto, C., Siddi, S., Senior, C., Muñoz-Samons, D., Ochoa, S., Sánchez-Laforga, A.

M., & Brébion, G. (2017). Visual imagery and false memory for pictures: A

functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy participants. PLoS ONE,

12(1), e0169551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169551

Whitten, L. (2012). Functional Magnetic resonance Imaging (FMRI): an invaluable tool in

translational neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2012.op.0010.1212

Wu, B. (2021, December 31). Missing a mind’s eye: The metacognition of Aphantasia. Grey

Matters. https://greymattersjournal.org/missing-a-minds-eye-the-metacognition-of-

aphantasia/