Workshop Powerpoint - Share
Workshop Powerpoint - Share
SSST Literature
Tutorial Support
IDENTITY
CULTURE
CREATIVITY
COMMUNICATION
PERSPECTIVE
TRANSFORMATION
REPRESENTATION
Determining the global issue
3 A global issue incorporates the following three properties :
It is transnational
Nine works
At least three works in translation. Works in translation: works originally written in a different
language than the language A being studied.
Works from at least three of the four Literary forms: poetry, drama, fiction, non-fiction.
literary forms.
Works which cover at least three Period: century the works were written in.
periods.
Works which cover at least three Places: countries or occasionally regions which the author is
places, and at least two continents. closely associated with, and not the setting of the work.
At least two works for each of the Areas of exploration: Readers, writers and texts;
areas of exploration. Time and space; Intertextuality: Connecting texts.
Overview
7 The Learner Portfolio
The learner portfolio is a place for a student to explore and reflect upon literary texts,
and to establish connections among them and with the areas of exploration and the
central concepts in the subject.
The learner portfolio is also a space in which students can prepare for assessment.
The learner portfolio must consist of a diversity of formal and informal responses to the
works studied, which may come in a range of critical and/or creative forms, and in
different media.
Teachers are free to monitor and set guidelines for the learner portfolios, but students
should be encouraged to shape them in ways that allow them to independently record
their personal development. The type of portfolio the students keep—digital or non-
digital, traditional or multimodal—will be dictated by individual learning preferences.
Students should be allowed to explore different options freely.
Features of Paper 1
The focus of Paper 1 on literary analysis of an unseen text remains the same, but
several new factors need to be taken into account.
Outline / planning
PIE
Commentary structure
Embedding quotations
Phrases
Link words / connecting devices
Register
Referring to “the author”
Naming devices + explaining their effects
Language-specific conventions (commentary writing,
structure, quoting, use of comma)
“Time”
Assessment of
11
Paper 1
Sample assessments (with examiner comments) in various languages
in the IB Online Resources Centre … (MyIB)
Paper 1:
Tools
• Literary devices
• SCASI
• Literary charts
Features of Paper 2
The focus of Paper 2 on response to set works in the form of a comparative essay
remains the same but again there are significant new features to take into account.
4. Students are required to write about any two works studied (as long as
those are not used in any other assessment). They are advised to have
selected in advance three works to revise for this paper.
Selecting texts for
14 Paper 2
1. Discuss how two works you have studied present concepts of good and bad, not as
absolute notions, but as a matter of individual perception.
2. Referring to two works you have studied, discuss how the author has created a
convincing “world”.
3. In what ways do at least two of the works you have studied (in form and/or content)
question or subvert norms, conventions or traditions ?
4. Explore how women are represented as stronger than men in at least two of the works
you have studied.
18
Overview
The individual oral means speaking for 15 minutes focusing on this
prompt:
choose two works – one must be a work originally written in the SSST
language and one in translation
decide on a global issue that is explored in some way in each of
the works
select an extract from each work that highlights the chosen global
issue
write the outline on the form that is given to them by the supervisor
practise *
Structuring the Individual Oral
20
“Please bear in mind that the oral is as much about the presence of the global issue in the extracts
as it is about its presence in the broader works from which they come. In that sense, students
cannot spend 6’ on an extract. If following a sequential, “part-by-part” structure, SSST students
should perhaps follow this format :
- 1.5’ introduction
- 3’ extract 1
- 3’ work 1
- 3’ extract 2
- 3’ work 2
- 1.5’ conclusion
This is not the only way of organising the oral, and no examiner will be using stopwatches either.
The important thing is that there should be a sense of balance between the four “parts” the
student - SSST or taught - is expected to explore the global issue in : extract 1, work 1, extract 2,
work 2.”