0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

CMPS715CSP

Uploaded by

rayane raba'a
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

CMPS715CSP

Uploaded by

rayane raba'a
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Constraint Satisfaction

Problems

Chapter 5
Section 1 – 3

1
Outline
 Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP)
 Backtracking search for CSPs
 Local search for CSPs

2
Constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs)

 Standard search problem:


 state is a "black box“ – any data structure that
supports successor function, heuristic function,
and goal test
 CSP:
 state is defined by variables Xi with values from
domain Di
 goal test is a set of constraints specifying
allowable combinations of values for subsets of
variables

3
Example: Map-Coloring

 Variables WA, NT, Q, NSW, V, SA, T


 Domains Di = {red,green,blue}
 Constraints: adjacent regions must have different colors
 e.g., WA ≠ NT, or (WA,NT) in
{(red,green),(red,blue),(green,red),
(green,blue),(blue,red),(blue,green)}

4
Example: Map-Coloring

 Solutions are complete and consistent assignments,


e.g., WA = red, NT = green,Q = red,NSW =
green,V = red,SA = blue,T = green

5
Constraint graph
 Binary CSP: each constraint relates two variables
 Constraint graph: nodes are variables, arcs are constraints

6
Varieties of CSPs
 Discrete variables
 finite domains:

 n variables, domain size d  O(dn) complete assignments


 e.g., Boolean CSPs, incl.~Boolean satisfiability (NP-complete)
 infinite domains:
 integers, strings, etc.
 e.g., job scheduling, variables are start/end days for each job
 need a constraint language, e.g., StartJob1 + 5 ≤ StartJob3
 Continuous variables
 linear constraints solvable in polynomial time by linear programming

7
Varieties of constraints
 Unary constraints involve a single variable,
 e.g., SA ≠ green
 Binary constraints involve pairs of variables,
 e.g., SA ≠ WA
 Higher-order constraints involve 3 or more
variables,
 e.g., cryptarithmetic column constraints

8
Example: Cryptarithmetic

 Variables: F T U W
R O X1 X2 X3
 Domains: {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
 Constraints: Alldiff (F,T,U,W,R,O)
 O + O = R + 10 · X1
 X1 + W + W = U + 10 · X2
 X2 + T + T = O + 10 · X3
 X3 = F, T ≠ 0, F ≠ 0

9
Example: Sudoku

 Variables:
 Each (open) square
 Domains:
 {1,2,…,9}
 Constraints:
9-way all diff for each column
9-way all diff for each row
9-way alldiff for each region
(or can have a bunch of
pairwise inequality
constraints)
Real-world CSPs
 Assignment problems
 e.g., who teaches what class
 Timetabling problems
 e.g., which class is offered when and where?
 Transportation scheduling
 Factory scheduling
 Notice that many real-world problems involve real-
valued variables

11
Standard search formulation (incremental)

Let's start with the straightforward approach, then fix it


States are defined by the values assigned so far

 Initial state: the empty assignment { }


 Successor function: assign a value to an
unassigned variable that does not conflict with
current assignment
 fail if no legal assignments

 Goal test: the current assignment is complete

4 Feb 2004 CS 3243 - Constraint Satisfaction 12


Backtracking search
 Variable assignments are commutative}, i.e.,
[ WA = red then NT = green ] same as [ NT = green then WA = red ]

 Only need to consider assignments to a single variable at each node


 b = d and there are (d^n)leaves

 Depth-first search for CSPs with single-variable assignments is called


backtracking search

 Backtracking search is the basic uninformed algorithm for CSPs

 Can solve n-queens for n ≈ 25

13
Backtracking search

14
Backtracking example

15
Backtracking example

16
Backtracking example

17
Backtracking example

18
Improving backtracking efficiency

 General-purpose methods can give huge


gains in speed:
 Which variable should be assigned next?
 In what order should its values be tried?
 Can we detect inevitable failure early?

19
Most constrained variable
 Most constrained variable:
choose the variable with the fewest legal values

 a.k.a. minimum remaining values (MRV)


heuristic

20
Most constraining variable
 Tie-breaker among most constrained
variables
 Most constraining variable:
 choose the variable with the most constraints on
remaining variables

21
Least constraining value
 Given a variable, choose the least
constraining value:
 the one that rules out the fewest values in the
remaining variables

22
Forward checking
 Idea:
 Keep track of remaining legal values for unassigned
variables
 Terminate search when any variable has no legal values

23
Forward checking
 Idea:
 Keep track of remaining legal values for unassigned
variables
 Terminate search when any variable has no legal values

24
Forward checking
 Idea:
 Keep track of remaining legal values for unassigned
variables
 Terminate search when any variable has no legal values

25
Forward checking
 Idea:
 Keep track of remaining legal values for unassigned
variables
 Terminate search when any variable has no legal values

26
Constraint propagation
 Forward checking propagates information from assigned to
unassigned variables, but doesn't provide early detection for
all failures:

 NT and SA cannot both be blue!


 Constraint propagation repeatedly enforces constraints
locally
27
Arc consistency
 Simplest form of propagation makes each arc consistent
 X Y is consistent iff
for every value x of X there is some allowed y

28
Arc consistency
 Simplest form of propagation makes each arc consistent
 X Y is consistent iff
for every value x of X there is some allowed y

29
Arc consistency
 Simplest form of propagation makes each arc consistent
 X Y is consistent iff
for every value x of X there is some allowed y

 If X loses a value, neighbors of X need to be rechecked

30
Arc consistency
 Simplest form of propagation makes each arc consistent
 X Y is consistent iff
for every value x of X there is some allowed y

 If X loses a value, neighbors of X need to be rechecked


 Arc consistency detects failure earlier than forward checking
 Can be run as a preprocessor or after each assignment
31
Arc consistency algorithm AC-3

32
Local search for CSPs
 Hill-climbing, simulated annealing typically work with
"complete" states, i.e., all variables assigned

 To apply to CSPs:
 allow states with unsatisfied constraints
 operators reassign variable values

 Variable selection: randomly select any conflicted variable

 Value selection by min-conflicts heuristic:


 choose value that violates the fewest constraints
 i.e., hill-climb with h(n) = total number of violated constraints

33
Summary
 CSPs are a special kind of problem:
 states defined by values of a fixed set of variables
 goal test defined by constraints on variable values

 Backtracking = depth-first search with one variable assigned per node

 Variable ordering and value selection heuristics help significantly

 Forward checking prevents assignments that guarantee later failure

 Constraint propagation (e.g., arc consistency) does additional work to


constrain values and detect inconsistencies

 Iterative min-conflicts is usually effective in practice

34

You might also like