Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational

Network with Incentive-Based Load Balancing∗

German Rodikov†
University of Bologna
1 January 2025
arXiv:2501.01219v1 [q-fin.CP] 2 Jan 2025

Abstract
This paper proposes a model that enables permissionless and decentralized net-
works for complex computations. We explore the integration and optimize load
balancing in an open, decentralized computational network. Our model leverages
economic incentives and reputation-based mechanisms to dynamically allocate tasks
between operators and coprocessors. This approach eliminates the need for special-
ized hardware or software, thereby reducing operational costs and complexities. We
present a mathematical model that enhances restaking processes in blockchain sys-
tems by enabling operators to delegate complex tasks to coprocessors. The model’s
effectiveness is demonstrated through experimental simulations, showcasing its abil-
ity to optimize reward distribution, enhance security, and improve operational effi-
ciency.
Our approach facilitates a more flexible and scalable network through the use of
economic commitments, adaptable dynamic rating models, and a coprocessor load
incentivization system. Supported by experimental simulations, the model demon-
strates its capability to optimize resource allocation, enhance system resilience, and
reduce operational risks. This ensures significant improvements in both security and
cost-efficiency for the blockchain ecosystem.

1 Introduction
Blockchain technologies have continually evolved, focusing on enhancing scalability and
security. Innovations such as the Optimistic Delegation Framework (ODF) and Proposer-
Builder Separation (PBS) refine transaction validation processes by assigning specialized
roles within blockchain networks. This paper presents an optimization model that aligns
incentives and distributes computational tasks effectively among Operators and Copro-
cessors within the AVS, leveraging a restaking mechanism. It explores how restaking op-
erators use standalone coprocessors for complex tasks, reducing the need for specialized
hardware or software and cutting securitization costs while boosting network efficiency.
∗
A conceptual framework for discussion and proof of concept, exploring its applicability.
†
GR acknowledges financial support from the Italian Ministry MUR under the PRIN2020 project
”Dynamic models for a fast-changing world: An observation driven approach to time-varying parameters”
(grant agreement no. 20205J2WZ4).

1
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 2

The main assumptions and model considerations include: a reward function that
compensates Operators and Coprocessors based on task complexity and computational
resources; slashing conditions that define penalties for non-compliance; a collateral system
to secure commitments; a reputation system that affects task allocation and reward dis-
tribution as the effect of it; an auction mechanism for cost-effective Coprocessor selection;
and a risk analysis framework to manage potential losses effectively.
Our approach uses probabilistic modeling to predict and manage the risks associated
with task execution failures, forming the basis for our optimization problem aimed at
maximizing total expected rewards while mitigating slashing risks. The model’s dynamic
nature allows it to adapt over time, capturing the temporal changes in network conditions
and participant behavior through a feedback mechanism that updates probabilities based
on past performance data.
To ensure the model’s practical relevance and adaptability, we incorporate mechanisms
for demand forecasting and capacity planning, essential for managing resource allocation
in response to fluctuating demands for AVS tasks. This paper outlines the development
of these models, providing a framework for their integration into existing blockchain
infrastructures to enhance efficiency and economic viability.

1.1 Preliminaries
In this section, we provide a deeper understanding of the existing system’s operation and
the foundational changes proposed by our model. This study develops a comprehensive
mathematical model for the Optimistic Delegation Framework (ODF) and Proposer-
Builder Separation (PBS) with a focus on Actively Validated Services (AVS) within the
blockchain ecosystem. Our model seeks to optimize the distribution of rewards and min-
imize risks associated with penalizations, known as ”slashing,” under these frameworks.
In the current PBS model, the roles of proposers and builders are separated to reduce
potential conflicts of interest and enhance transaction censorship resistance. Proposers
are responsible for adding new blocks to the blockchain, while builders, operating in-
dependently, focus on constructing the content of these blocks, including transaction
ordering. This separation ensures that builders can specialize in maximizing block value
through sophisticated strategies without directly influencing block proposals.
The model introduces a layer of complexity and opportunity by enabling operators
to delegate specific computational tasks to specialized coprocessors. This delegation is
critical for handling tasks that are resource-intensive or require specialized computational
capabilities, which are beyond the efficient handling capacity of general operators.

System Architecture and Role Descriptions:

• Operators perform validations and execute tasks as part of the AVS, ensuring ad-
herence to distributed validation semantics. These tasks can range from lightweight
to heavyweight, depending on the trust model and operational demands of the spe-
cific AVS they opt into. Operators plays a pivotal role by ensuring the integrity
of transactions and deciding whether to execute tasks directly or delegate them to
coprocessors. Their operations are augmented by several methods including reward
calculation, coprocessor selection based on a scoring system that considers compu-
tational capability and reliability, and performance updates that influence future
task allocations and reward calculations.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 3

• Coprocessors are specialized nodes that handle delegated tasks. They participate
in auctions to win tasks by making competitive bids that reflect their processing
capabilities and current workload. The efficiency of coprocessors directly impacts
their profitability and the overall efficiency of the blockchain operation.

• AVS Tasks within this system vary in complexity and associated risks. The model
takes into account the difficulty of tasks, potential rewards, and risks of penalties
to optimize task allocation.

In this paper, we investigate the use of standalone coprocessors by restaking operators

for complex computations. This model enables operators to effectively execute AVS tasks
without the need to personally manage specific hardware or software, reducing the costs
associated with securitization and enhancing operational efficiency within the network.
Our model implements a dynamic and adaptive mechanism to adjust task alloca-
tions based on real-time performance data. This approach not only aims to balance the
computational load across the network but also to refine the reward system based on
evolving network conditions and coprocessor performance. Additionally, the proposed
model incorporates a feedback mechanism to continuously learn from past allocations
and outcomes, thus improving its predictive capabilities and efficiency.
Dynamic Task Allocation, by integrating real-time performance analytics, the sys-
tem can dynamically allocate tasks to operators and coprocessors based on their current
load and historical accuracy. Feedback Loop, implementing a feedback loop will allow
the system to adapt its parameters based on the outcomes of previous task allocations,
enhancing both system resilience and task performance predictability. Auction Mech-
anisms, the auction process for selecting coprocessors will be refined to include factors
such as past performance, reputation, and economic bidding strategies to ensure fair and
efficient task distribution.
These enhancements are designed to leverage the specialized capabilities of copro-
cessors more effectively while maintaining the decentralized nature and security of the
blockchain.

2 Methodology
The proposed model is formulated as a stochastic optimization problem where the objec-
tive is to maximize the expected net rewards of Operators and Coprocessors, taking into
account the risk of penalties and the constraints of the system.

2.1 Variables and Parameters

The model comprises the following entities and their respective variables:

• V = {v1 , v2 , . . . , vn }: the set of all Operators.

• C = {c1 , c2 , . . . , cm }: the set of all Coprocessors.

• A = {a1 , a2 , . . . , ak }: the set of all tasks within the AVS.

• rv,a : the reward for Operator v upon successful completion of task a.

• sv,a : the slashing risk for Operator v when task a is performed incorrectly.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 4

• pv,c,a : the probability of successful task completion by Operator v and Coprocessor

c for task a.

• bc,a : the bid submitted by Coprocessor c for task a.

• lc,a : the collateral posted by Coprocessor c for task a.

2.2 Objective Function

The objective function is designed to maximize the total expected benefit for each Oper-
ator, computed as follows:
X
Bv = (rv,a · pv,c,a − sv,a · (1 − pv,c,a ))
a∈A

where Bv represents the net expected benefit for Operator v, accounting for both rewards
and risks associated with task executions.

2.3 Optimization Problem

The selection of Coprocessors by Operators is modeled through an auction mechanism,
incorporating both cost considerations and the probability of successful task completion.
The optimization problem can be stated as:
XX
Maximize xv,c,a (rv,a · pv,c,a − sv,a · (1 − pv,c,a ) − bc,a )
c∈C a∈A

subject to:
X
xv,c,a ≤ 1 ∀a ∈ A
c∈C
xv,c,a · lc,a ≥ Minimum Collateral Requirement ∀c ∈ C, a ∈ A
xv,c,a ∈ {0, 1} ∀v ∈ V, c ∈ C, a ∈ A

Here, xv,c,a is a binary variable indicating whether Operator v selects Coprocessor c for
task a.

Figure 1: Precompute auction model based on bids

Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 5

In addition to the aforementioned stochastic optimization framework, our study fur-

ther explores the application of economic incentive structures within blockchain ecosys-
tems. To demonstrate the practical implications and robustness of our model, we simulate
the Economic Incentive Optimal Load Curve 5. Through detailed simulations, we illus-
trate the effectiveness of the model in maintaining an optimal balance between resource
allocation and economic incentives, which is crucial for sustaining high network perfor-
mance and reliability.
To accommodate the evolving nature of the blockchain ecosystem, the model inte-
grates dynamic elements through time-dependent variables, allowing it to adapt and
respond to changing conditions over time. This dynamic approach ensures that strate-
gies can be adjusted based on past performance and anticipated future conditions, thus
enhancing the robustness and effectiveness of the model.

3 Experiment
3.1 Experiment Setup
In our experimental setup, we simulate a blockchain network consisting of operators and
coprocessors to test the proposed optimization model described earlier. The simulation
aims to understand how the system behaves under various scenarios, particularly focusing
on the distribution of tasks, the impact of reward systems, and the effectiveness of setup
mechanisms.

3.1.1 Configuration Parameters

• Operators: 100
• Coprocessors: 100
• Simulation Periods: 1000
Each operator and coprocessor is initialized with a set of attributes. Operators have
varying resources, reputations, and preferences on a task. We have over 1 million tasks
to compute across all periods. Coprocessors are differentiated by their resources and
reputations. Tasks vary in difficulty, potential rewards, associated slashing penalties,
and risk factors.

3.2 Methodology
3.2.1 Task Allocation and Execution
Operators decide on task assignments based on their resources and the complexity of the
tasks. They may choose to execute tasks themselves or auction them to coprocessors
depending on their strategy, which considers both task difficulty and potential rewards.
1. Task Execution by Operators: Operators execute tasks if their available re-
sources exceed the task difficulty and the task complexity.
2. Auctioning to Coprocessors: For more complex tasks, operators auction these
tasks to coprocessors. The auction mechanism is based on bids reflecting the co-
processors’ capabilities and current workload.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 6

3.2.2 Auctioning to Coprocessors

For tasks that exceed the complexity threshold of operators, an auction mechanism is
employed to determine which coprocessor will undertake the task. This auction is a
modified Dutch auction, where the initial high bid price is progressively lowered until a
coprocessor accepts the task. However, unlike traditional Dutch auctions that focus solely
on price, this system also integrates the coprocessors’ resources and current workload into
the bidding process.

Dutch Auction Mechanics In the Dutch auction model used in our system:

• The auction starts with a high price set close to the maximum reward associated
with the task.

• The price is progressively lowered at fixed intervals until a coprocessor places a bid,
signaling their willingness to accept the task at the current price.

Integration of Coprocessor Resources The unique aspect of our auction model is

the integration of each coprocessor’s available resources and workload:

• Resource Consideration: Each coprocessor’s current available resources are con-

sidered when setting the initial and decrementing prices. Coprocessors with higher
available resources may qualify for starting the bidding at more favorable prices, as
they are more capable of efficiently completing the task.

• Workload Consideration: The current workload of a coprocessor affects their

ability to bid. Coprocessors nearing or at their capacity might be disincentivized to
participate early in the auction, or they might bid at lower prices that reflect their
higher operational risks and costs.

Bidding Strategy The strategy for each coprocessor is to balance their resource uti-
lization with the potential rewards:

• Coprocessors must decide whether to bid early at a higher price, risking a decrease
in available resources but gaining higher rewards.

• Alternatively, they might wait for the price to drop to lower levels that better match
their current resource availability and risk profile.

This modified Dutch auction system ensures that tasks are allocated not only based
on price competitiveness but also in a manner that respects the operational capabilities
and current conditions of each coprocessor. This strategic allocation aids in maintaining
system efficiency and task reliability, even under varying network conditions.

3.3 Analysis Approach

The collected data will be analyzed to assess:

1. Efficiency of Task Distribution: How effectively tasks are allocated between

operators and coprocessors based on their resources and capabilities.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 7

2. Economic Incentives: The impact of reward structures and slashing mechanisms

on the behavior of operators and coprocessors.

3. System Robustness: How the system withstands various operational stresses,

such as high task complexity and resource constraints.

4. Dynamic Adaptation: The responsiveness of the system to changing conditions

through the feedback mechanism, which adjusts operational strategies based on
past outcomes.

This experiment is designed to validate the hypothesis that the proposed model en-
hances the efficiency and security of blockchain operations through optimized Proposer-
Builder Separation:

• A balanced distribution of tasks that maximizes the utilization of available resources

while minimizing risks and penalties.

• Adaptive behaviors in operators and coprocessors, leading to an evolving and re-

silient blockchain ecosystem.

• Investigating the stability of the system to determine optimal parameters ensuring

its sustained existence.

By analyzing the simulation results, we aim to demonstrate the practical viability of

our model and its potential to improve blockchain operations.

4 Results
This section presents the empirical outcomes of the experimental simulations performed to
validate the efficacy of the proposed optimization model within the blockchain’s restaking
mechanism. The results not only illustrate the impact of various slashing factors on the
system’s stability and reward mechanisms but also reveal critical insights into the opera-
tional dynamics between operators and coprocessors under different network conditions.
By systematically analyzing these outcomes, we can derive significant conclusions about
the robustness of the proposed model and its adaptability to the fluctuating demands of
a blockchain environment.

4.1 Impact of Slashing Factors on Operators Dynamics and Re-

ward Distribution
The experiment investigates the effects of slashing factors on the activity of operators
and their reward accumulation over time. Slashing, a punitive measure, is implemented
to deter malicious activities by penalizing operators and coprocessors for misbehavior
or failures. This section analyzes how different slashing intensities, represented by the
factor s, influence the network’s health and economic incentives. This section specifically
focuses on identifying some non-zero slashing parameter, observing the long-term survival
and reputation of coprocessors, and showing the overall stability of the system.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 8

Figure 2: Top: Number of Active Operators Over Time; Bottom: Cumulative Reward
Over Time, segmented by different slashing factors s.

4.1.1 Number of Active Operators

The top plot in Figure 2 shows the number of active operators over time under different
slashing factors. Notably, higher slashing factors (s = 0.2, 0.5) lead to a rapid decline in
activity in the system, indicating a harsh punitive environment that may drive operators
away from the network. Conversely, very low slashing factors (s = 0.01) maintain a
higher number of active operators, suggesting insufficient deterrence against potential
misbehavior.

4.1.2 Cumulative Reward Over Time

The bottom plot illustrates the cumulative rewards accrued by operators and coprocessors
over time, differentiated by slashing factors. It can be observed that moderate slashing
factors (α = 0.03, 0.1) strike a balance, leading to a steady growth in cumulative rewards
without significant drops in operator activity. This suggests that finding an optimal
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 9

slashing factor is crucial to maintaining a healthy balance between punitive measures

and incentives, ensuring network security and operators/coprocessors profitability.
Our study acknowledges the limitation of simulating a fixed number of operators and
coprocessors, which might not fully represent real-world dynamics where these numbers
can fluctuate. In future work, we aim to extend our model to include variable operator
and coprocessor counts, enhancing the robustness and applicability of our findings. This
adjustment will allow us to explore more deeply how network dynamics affect blockchain
efficiency and security under different regulatory frameworks.

4.2 Analysis of Rewards Distribution Over Time

The plot in Figure 3 provided a graphical representation that illustrates the evolution of
reward distribution among operators across different periods within the blockchain envi-
ronment. Initially, there is a noticeable diversity in rewards, which likely reflects a varied
distribution of task complexities handled by the operators themselves. As the periods
progress, the rewards across operators begin to converge towards a more uniform distri-
bution. This trend suggests a systematic shift in the task management strategy, where
operators increasingly delegate the more computationally intensive tasks to coprocessors.

Figure 3: Subset of Operators Reward Over Time.

Such a shift is indicative of the operators’ adaptation to optimize their operational

efficiency and resource utilization, leveraging the specialized capabilities of coprocessors
to handle complex calculations. Over time, as operators delegate heavier computational
tasks to coprocessors, they can focus on less resource-intensive tasks. This delegation
enhances the overall system stability by reducing the burden on individual operators,
thereby minimizing the risk of bottlenecks or failures due to overload.

4.3 Operator Reputation vs. Total Reward

The scatter plot in Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between the reputation of opera-
tors and the total rewards they earn. It is evident that operators with higher reputations
tend to accumulate higher rewards, indicating that reputation is a significant factor in
determining the allocation and successful completion of tasks.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 10

Figure 4: Scatter plot showing the correlation between operator reputation and the total
rewards earned.

4.4 Network of Operators and Coprocessors

Figure 5 depicts the interactions between operators and coprocessors. Each line represents
tasks assigned from operators to coprocessors, with different colors indicating the volume
of transactions. This network diagram is crucial for understanding the flow of tasks and
the dynamics of task allocation across the system.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 11

Figure 5: Network visualization of a subset of five operators and ten coprocessors illus-
trating the distribution of tasks.

4.5 Coprocessor Load vs. Reward

The distribution of rewards relative to the workload of coprocessors is shown in Figure 6.
The plot suggests that while the reward mechanism is generally effective, there is con-
siderable variance in rewards, particularly at higher workloads, reflecting the challenges
coprocessors face in balancing efficiency and reward optimization.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 12

Figure 6: Plot of coprocessor load versus the rewards earned, highlighting the impact of
workload on profitability.

4.6 Distribution of Tasks Among Coprocessors Over Time

The dynamic allocation of tasks to coprocessors over time is visualized in Figure 7. This
representation helps in understanding how different coprocessors are utilized throughout
the operational period, emphasizing the scalability and flexibility of the network.

Figure 7: Color-coded visualization of tasks assigned to a subset of coprocessors over

time, showcasing the operational dynamics of the network.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 13

5 Simulation of Economic Incentive Optimal Load

Curve
The proposed approach utilizes an economic incentive optimal load curve as a permis-
sionless protocol through a Generalized Autoregressive Score (GAS) reputation system
with economic incentives. This system dynamically balances load distribution among
operators and coprocessors to optimize resource utilization and enhance overall network
efficiency.

5.1 Economic Incentives and Load Management

The GAS model is employed to create a reputation system that incentivizes coprocessors
based on their performance and load management. The approach encourages low-load
scenarios with positive incentives such as economic rewards for maintaining unloaded
uptime. Conversely, high-load scenarios are disincentivized through amplified slashing,
ensuring that coprocessors manage their resources efficiently to avoid penalties.
The optimal load curve is mathematically defined by the piecewise function:
 2
−( x−B )
A · e B
 − C, if x < B
f (x) = D + (x − B) · E, if B ≤ x ≤ F

2
max (G · (x − H) + I, 0) , if x > F


where: - A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I are constants derived from network parameters. -

x represents the load.

5.2 Incorporation of GAS Models

The GAS model’s core principle is the use of a scaled score to drive time variation in
parameters of incentive. This is represented by the recursion:
 
∂ log p (yt | ft )
ft+1 = ω + βft + αS (ft )
∂ft

where: - ft is a time-varying parameter linked to load. - p (yt | ft ) is the conditional

observation density for observations yt . - S (ft ) is a scaling function for the score of the
log observation density.
This approach links the conditional observation density directly to the dynamics of ft ,
allowing the model to adapt to large values in the data distribution without overreacting
to outliers.
The network diagram in Figure 8 illustrates the theoretical inclination of coprocessor
load, highlighting the distribution of tasks and the overall network dynamics. The efficient
task allocation ensures that the network remains resilient and capable of handling varying
loads and operational demands.
In the simulation, coprocessors decide on auction and task bidding and execution
based on their current load and reputation levels. Tasks that are less resource-intensive
are executed by operators, while more complex tasks are auctioned to coprocessors. This
dynamic task allocation mechanism ensures optimal resource utilization and maximizes
overall network performance.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 14

Figure 8: Theoretical Coprocessor Load

The effectiveness of this model is demonstrated through a simulation of coprocessor

load versus reward and alpha, as depicted in the scatter plot in Figure 9. The plot
showcases how the load impacts the rewards earned by coprocessors and highlights the
critical balance between load management and economic incentives.

Figure 9: Simulated Coprocessor Load

This approach in the blockchain topology provides a robust framework for optimizing
load distribution and economic incentives. By dynamically adjusting task allocations
and incorporating reputation-based rewards and penalties, the system ensures efficient
resource utilization and enhances overall network stability. The simulation results vali-
date the model’s efficacy, demonstrating its potential to improve blockchain operations,
resilience, and ecosystem efficiency.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 15

6 Open Questions
6.1 Adaptive Mechanisms and Feedback Loop
The model includes adaptive mechanisms such as real-time performance adjustments and
strategic task auctions to manage resource allocation and mitigate risks. Validators and
coprocessors operate within a feedback loop structure that adjusts future task allocations
based on historical performance data and the generalized autoregressive score framework,
ensuring a resilient blockchain ecosystem. The feedback loop ensures efficient task distri-
bution among all participants and plays a crucial role in decision-making for delegating
specific tasks to particular coprocessors.
However, there is potential for further improvement by implementing a more com-
plex system for the feedback loop. Incorporating additional elements such as staking
mechanisms can enhance the system’s robustness and efficiency. Open Questions:

• What parameters should be considered to fine-tune the slashing mechanism to deter

misbehavior while maintaining active participation?

• How can the reward distribution model be optimized to ensure validators and co-
processors are adequately motivated?

6.2 Error Detection and Tolerance

The error tolerance system is designed to allow for determinism in task execution, man-
aging errors without compromising the network’s integrity and efficiency. The model
employs a probabilistic approach to predict and manage risks associated with task exe-
cution failures, forming the basis for optimizing rewards and minimizing slashing risks.
Ensuring accuracy and reliability in blockchain computations is crucial for maintaining
network integrity. One of the challenges is how to convert a non-arithmetic answer into
a deterministic result for calculations (Sanka et al. 2021).
Open Questions:

• How can independent validators, such as fishermen, or multiple coprocessors per-

forming the same computations enhance validation efficiency? The fishermen act as
independent caretakers who monitor the network for malicious activities or errors,
ensuring the integrity of the overall system.
Fishermen Mechanism: Independent validators, can be incorporated to monitor
task execution. These validators can identify discrepancies or malicious behavior,
providing an additional layer of security (Burdges et al. 2020).

• How can we verify that attributes such as ”blue” and ”tall” are consistent for items
like ”sofa”? Implementing an error tolerance system that allows minor variances
within set limits can address this, acknowledging non-determinism while maintain-
ing integrity. Employing diverse validation mechanisms, such as using tokens, en-
sures comprehensive verification.

One of the innovative technologies that can enhance validation efficiency and ensure
privacy is the use of Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge
(zk-SNARKs). These cryptographic proofs allow one party (the prover) to prove to an-
other party (the verifier) that they know a value or that a certain statement is true,
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 16

without revealing any additional information. Employing zk-SNARKs can reduce the
communication overhead and increase the speed of validation processes, significantly im-
proving the efficiency of the system while maintaining high standards of privacy and
security.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 17

7 Conclusion
In conclusion, this study developed and tested a mathematical model designed specifically
for enhancing restaking processes within blockchain systems. Our model focuses on em-
powering restaking operators to utilize coprocessors for handling complex computations,
without requiring direct management of specialized hardware or software. This approach
allows operators to efficiently engage in restaking by outsourcing compute-heavy AVS
tasks to partner network services, thus avoiding the additional costs and complexities
associated with securitization.
Our experimental simulations provide robust support for the model, demonstrating its
ability to optimize reward distribution and minimize the risks associated with slashing.
This is achieved through dynamic and strategic allocation of computational tasks between
operators and coprocessors, which adapts seamlessly to the changing demands of the
blockchain environment. The results indicate not only an increase in net expected rewards
for participants but also a fair and efficient distribution of tasks, validating the efficacy
of our approach.
Moreover, the model incorporates adaptive mechanisms such as real-time performance
adjustments and strategic task auctions, which have proven effective in managing resource
allocation and mitigating risks. These features ensure a robust and resilient blockchain
ecosystem, capable of adjusting to both short-term fluctuations and long-term shifts in
network conditions.
Overall, the proposed model offers a substantial improvement over Proposer-Builder
Separation by ensuring high security, and reducing operational costs. These advance-
ments are pivotal in fostering a more equitable and efficient blockchain environment.
Our study provides a robust framework that enhances system operations within advanced
validation frameworks. Future research will focus on further refining these models by ex-
ploring additional parameters and extending the validation to various blockchain archi-
tectures. Such endeavors will deepen our understanding of the model’s implications and
broaden its applicability, potentially setting new benchmarks for blockchain optimization.
Model of an Open, Decentralized Computational Network with Incentive-Based Load
Balancing 18

8 References
1. Buterin, V. (2021). Proposer-Builder Separation for Censorship Resistance. Re-
trieved from Ethereum Research Notes.

2. Drew Van der Werff and Swapin Raj (2021). Optimistic Delegation Framework: An
Idea to Allow for Native Restaking Without Delegation. Retrieved from Eigenlayer
Research.

3. Jones, D. and Williams, R. (2020). Blockchain Optimization Models: A Survey of

Approaches and Techniques. Journal of Cryptography.

4. Li, T., and Wang, Y. (2019). Stochastic Modeling in Blockchain Management.

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

5. Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). Risk Management in Blockchain Systems. Blockchain in

Business and IT.

6. Patel, A., and Smith, B. (2019). Dynamic Modeling for Blockchain Applications.
Journal of Network Computing.

7. Thompson, K. (2021). Resource Allocation in Blockchain Systems: An Auction-

Based Approach. Journal of Blockchain Economics.

8. Burdges, Jeff, et al. (2020). Overview of polkadot and its design considerations.

9. Sanka, A. I., and Cheung, R. C. (2021). A systematic review of blockchain scal-

ability: Issues, solutions, analysis and future research. Journal of Network and
Computer Applications, 195, 103232.

10. Abbas, H., Caprolu, M., Di Pietro, R. (2022, August). Analysis of polkadot: Ar-
chitecture, internals, and contradictions. In 2022 IEEE International Conference
on Blockchain (Blockchain) (pp. 61-70). IEEE.

11. Ezzat, S. K., Saleh, Y. N., Abdel-Hamid, A. A. (2022). Blockchain oracles: State-
of-the-art and research directions. IEEE Access, 10, 67551-67572.

12. Gad, A. G., Mosa, D. T., Abualigah, L., Abohany, A. A. (2022). Emerging trends
in blockchain technology and applications: A review and outlook. Journal of King
Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(9), 6719-6742.