Kelemen Danijela 0122229363 Rad Diplomski
Kelemen Danijela 0122229363 Rad Diplomski
Subtitling
Kelemen, Danijela
Master's thesis /
Repository / Repozitorij:
Danijela Kelemen
Diplomski rad
Osijek, 2023.
Sveučilište J.J. Strossmayera u Osijeku
Danijela Kelemen
Diplomski rad
Osijek, 2023.
J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek
Danijela Kelemen
Master’s Thesis
Osijek, 2023
J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek
Danijela Kelemen
Master’s Thesis
Osijek, 2023
Abstract
The focus of this thesis is the type of audiovisual translation called subtitling, that is, the
potential ways in which it could be brought closer to the audience. Subtitling and its
recognition as a form of translation rather than just a means of adaptation is increasing every
day, which is no wonder, considering that nowadays people do not only watch movies and
series on television but on a variety of streaming devices that, naturally, tend to provide
subtitles. However, this brings up the question of how subtitles should be presented to the
audience. Since they are co-dependent on the situations happening on screen, the emotions of
the characters, and the visual representations altogether – it is not enough that they solely
provide translation, but they should also be adapted to everything encompassed in the scene.
One of the main factors subtitlers should focus on is the audience they are making the
subtitles for and the language that particular audience uses in real life. It can often be seen
that subtitles are translated more formally than necessary, in all probability to make them
more “polite” for the audience. That is one of the subjects to be tackled in the continuation of
the thesis. This work will explain subtitling and its challenges and requirements for certain
streaming services like Netflix in more detail. Furthermore, there will be mention of formal
and informal language and their role in everyday communication, together with examples
shown for each. English register and styles together with Croatian functional styles will be
presented. In addition, the possibilities of playing with language use and ways of bringing it
closer to the audience will be explored.
Ovaj rad usmjeren je na vrstu audiovizualnog prijevoda koji se naziva titlovanje, odnosno na
potencijalne načine na koje bi se moglo približiti gledateljima. Titlovanje i prepoznavanje
titlovanja kao oblika prevođenja, a ne samo kao sredstva adaptacije, svakodnevno se
povećava. To nije iznenađujuće s obzirom na to da ljudi danas ne gledaju filmove i serije
samo na televiziji, već i na raznim streaming uređajima koji, naravno, imaju mogućnost
pružanja prijevoda (titlova). Međutim, postavlja se pitanje kako titlove treba prezentirati
gledateljima? Budući da su titlovi ovisni o situacijama koje se događaju na ekranu,
emocijama likova, vizualnim prikazima u cjelini, nije dovoljno da samo pružaju prijevod, već
bi trebali biti prilagođeni svemu što obuhvaća audiovizualni dio. Jedan od glavnih čimbenika
na koji se prevoditelji trebaju usredotočiti su gledatelji za koje stvaraju titlove i jezik koji
gledatelji koriste u stvarnom životu. Često se može vidjeti da se titlovi prevode formalnije
nego što je potrebno, vjerojatno da bi bili ,,pristojniji” za gledatelje. To je jedna od tema o
kojoj će se raditi u nastavku ovog rada. Tijekom rada pobliže će se objasniti titlovanje i
izazovi koje obuhvaća, zajedno sa zahtjevima za određene streaming usluge poput Netflixa.
Nadalje, spomenut će se formalni i neformalni jezik te njihova uloga u svakodnevnoj
komunikaciji, zajedno s prikazanim primjerima za svaki. U rad je također uključen pojam
registra te funkcionalnih stilova engleskog i hrvatskog jezika. Osim toga, istražit će se
mogućnosti igranja upotrebom jezika i načinom približavanja gledateljima.
CD – Cambridge Dictionary
OD – Oxford Dictionaries
ST – Source Text
TT – Targeted Text
FL – Formal Language
IL – Informal Language
SL – Source Language
TL – Target Language
1. Introduction
As an essential part of human communication, language is a dynamic, multifaceted tool that
captures the complexity and diversity of human society. Two distinct types that stand out
among the wide range of linguistic expressions are formal and informal language. These
types encompass numerous styles, lexicons, and organizational frameworks that are applied
in various circumstances and have an impact on how we communicate, interact, and build
social bonds.
Throughout this work, the usage of formal and informal language is explored more deeply,
especially in the context of one of the forms of audiovisual translation – subtitling. The aim is
to inspect what kinds of functional language styles exist and which form of expression they
require in translation – formal, informal or perhaps both. In subtitling, the use of formal and
informal language is a delicate balancing act that is greatly influenced by cultural
conventions, linguistic concerns, and the intended target audience, eventually having an
impact on the effectiveness of communication and the viewer's experience. Sometimes
subtitle translators may use formal language more often than is necessary. This may be due to
a number of elements, such as the need to uphold professionalism, the perception that
translated information should be formal, or an effort to follow certain linguistic traditions.
Insights into how language choices affect audience perception, emotional involvement, and
the general viewing experience can be gained by observing how viewers respond to the usage
of formal and informal language in subtitles. An experiment focusing precisely on this
subject will be presented in this paper, carrying the primary goal of researching translation
reception.
This work is divided into several chapters. The first two chapters provide an introduction to the
work as well as some theoretical background on translating. Chapter 3 deals with the
theoretical part on subtitling since the mentioned type of audiovisual translation is a key
element of the research. Chapter 4 presents the subtitling requirements for Netflix and some
specific guidelines for subtitling from English into the Croatian language when working for
Netflix. It is important to have a clear example of how subtitling rules can look like in order
to be aware of the numerous restrictions that subtitlers face on a daily basis. After covering
the theory on translation and subtitling, it is vital to review some general facts about language
and the various ways in which it functions. The distinction between formal and informal
language is further explored in Chapter 5, along with its significance and possible contexts in
2
subtitling. Furthermore, Chapter 6 deals with the areas of the English language register and
Croatian functional styles as well as crucial factors that influence translation techniques,
highlighting the significance of cultural adaptation in subtitling procedures. Introducing these
styles will give a more detailed perspective on the fact that not everything can be entirely
defined, in this case, the time and place of using a specific language style. The concluding
chapter provides a research on translation perception, in order to explore the viewers’
expectations of subtitled content more deeply. One of the main goals of this work is to
observe the reactions of the audience regarding the subject of displaying a variety of possible
translations (subtitles) and therefore finding out what their preferences are in order to help in
the further development of subtitled work.
2. Introduction to translating
For a better understanding of the research, this section briefly covers the theoretical
background of translating as described by Jeremy Munday in his work Introducing
Translation Studies, Theories and applications, Second Edition (2008). Among many others,
Munday mentions John Dryden’s categorization of translating, in the preface to his
translation of Ovid’s Epistles in 1680, which will be shortly explained because it is
considered an important moment for defining translation. Furthermore, he mentions Roman
Jacobson and the way he divided translation into three categories.
Writings on the subject of translating go far back in recorded history. The practice of
translation was discussed by, for example, Cicero and Horace (first century BCE) and St
Jerome (fourth century CE) (Munday 2008: 24). The term “translation” itself has several
meanings: it can refer to the general subject field, the product (the text that has been
translated) or the process (the act of producing the translation, otherwise known as
translating) (Munday 2008: 22). The process of translation between two different written
languages involves the translator changing an original written text (the source text or ST) in
the original verbal language (the source language or SL) into a written text (the target text or
TT) in a different verbal language (the target language or TL) (Munday 2008: 22). This type
of translation is called interlingual and it is the one we are focusing on the most during our
studies.
The further categorization of translating is also described by John Dryden (1680), who
reduced it to three categories: metaphrase, paraphrase and imitation. In this case, metaphrase
would be the literal, “word-for-word” translation, paraphrase would focus on the message of
3
the author rather than his exact words, and lastly, during imitation, the translator would forget
about both words and author’s message in order to create its free translation (some would
even call it the adaptation of the original). “Dryden’s proposed triad of the late seventeenth
century marked the beginning of a more systematic and precise definition of translation”
(Munday 2008: 51).
“Translation is defined as the cognitive and linguistic process the translator performs in
decoding a text which is the result of a communication act in the source language and in
encoding it as speech product in the target language by preserving the content and achieving
the stylistic quality of the source language text” (Gläser 1984: 123).
While translating could be infinitely dissected into detailed units, its influencing factors can
be narrowed down to the following: type of ST, purpose of translating it, targeted
readers/audience, cultural differences in SL and TL, context and emotional factors. The
mentioned factors are important for both written text and spoken dialogue.
Nowadays, with the creation of machine translation (MT) and computer-aided translation
(CAT) technologies, technology has been an increasingly important factor in translation.
Translation memory, terminology databases, and other features from CAT programs let
human translators work more quickly and consistently. While machine translation uses
artificial intelligence and algorithms to translate text automatically, it frequently needs human
post-editing to ensure accuracy and naturalness.
Translation is, in general, a difficult and dynamic process that calls for linguistic expertise,
cultural sensitivity, and adaptation to accurately translate meaning across languages and
cultures. There are different kinds of translation, some are meant to be read-only (e.g.
literary, technical, professional and administrative translation), and some are meant to be
watched and/or listened to (audiovisual translation such as dubbing, subtitling, voiceovers
etc.).
“When it comes to AVT (audiovisual translation), some prefer to talk about adaptation – an
attitude that has stymied the debate about AVT and could be tainted as having been one of
4
the main reasons why the whole area has been traditionally ignored by scholars in translation
until very recently” (Cintas, Remael 2007: 22).
In the continuation of this paper, the main aspects, challenges and requirements of subtitling
will be explained for the purpose of understanding the choices made by people who work in
subtitling but also to awaken some thoughts about what could be changed in the subtitling
world as a means to bring it even closer to the audience. In addition, the work digs deeper
into the “subtitler” profession in order to present everything it encompasses, because there is
more to it than just another means of translation.
When we mention subtitling, we refer to the text that is usually written on the bottom of the
screen in a horizontal position, with exceptions in some languages where it is placed
vertically (for example in the Japanese language). The text can either be a translation from
one language to another or it can be written in the same language as the audio. Naturally, in
both cases, the text must be synchronized with the events happening on the screen (dialogues,
monologues, songs etc.). In addition, the subtitles must be on the screen long enough for the
viewers to be able to read them. According to Cintas and Remael (2007: 9) all subtitled
programs are made up of three main components: the spoken word, the image and the
subtitles. The interaction of these three components, along with the viewer’s ability to read
both the images and the written text at a particular speed, and the actual size of the screen,
determine the basic characteristics of the audiovisual medium.
Already by the limitations in the making of subtitles mentioned above, it can be seen why
some people would consider subtitling as a form of adaptation rather than translation.
5
The following type of subtitling is interlingual, which represents translation from SL to TL,
made both for hearers and for the deaf and the hard-of-hearing (SDH). “Pressure groups in
countries such as Germany, UK and Italy have managed to get many foreign films marketed
in their countries with two different tracks of interlingual subtitles: one for the hearing
population and a second one that addresses the needs of the deaf” (Cintas, Remael 2007: 18).
Lastly, there is the bilingual type where bilingual subtitles are produced in geographical areas
where two languages are spoken and in international film festivals (ib.).
at the same time as the original programme is taking place or being broadcast” (Cintas,
Remael 2007: 19).
So far, together with electronic subtitling, laser subtitling has proven itself to be the most
effective one and it is most commonly used in cinema. One of the advantages of electronic
over laser is that “since electronic subtitles are independent of the audiovisual programme,
they can easily be revised and modified from projection to projection” (Cintas, Remael 2007:
23).
The spotter (subtitler) has “the technical task of deciding the in and out times of the subtitles,
and increasingly for creating templates and master titles with relevant annotations for the
translators” (Cintas, Remael 2007: 34). Spotters do not necessarily need to know other
foreign languages, but they do have to be familiar with film language, narrative techniques,
7
and they need to be technologically literate. On the other hand, the translators have to be
exceptional in both source and target language because they are the ones taking care of the
language transfer. In addition to the languages, translators must know about the cultures they
are translating from/to. Furthermore, the adaptors’ challenge is to fit the translation in the
subtitle lines and search for more adequate structures in the TL without altering the original
meaning, and they do not necessarily need to know the SL (Cintas, Remael 2007: 34).
However, in order to avoid mistakes due to too many people working on one project, and also
due to the lack of language knowledge when it comes to spotters and adaptors, nowadays,
translators are the ones who do the majority of the work that was once divided between
multiple people. In other words, subtitlers are, in the majority of cases, translators, spotters
and adapters.
“In other translation practices it might be easier to deal with some translational problems,
since obscure cultural referents or difficult plays on words can be left out or drastically
changed, without raising the receiver’s suspicion” (Cintas, Remael 2007: 74).
A possible way of dealing with this issue is using the so-called dialogue lists. “A dialogue list
is essentially the compilation of all the dialogue exchanges uttered in the film and it is a
document usually supplied by the film distributor or producer of the film’’ (ib.). The
mentioned lists, besides providing a transcription of all dialogue, may supply rules about
socio-cultural connotations, explain some plays on words, dialectal terms, and any other extra
information that could be helpful in subtitling certain content. However, according to Cintas
and Remael (2007: 75), dialogue lists are not very common in the profession, and work is
usually being done directly from the soundtrack.
The broadcasting or subtitling firm should also provide subtitlers with a style guide, or
something comparable, that outlines the key standards to be followed while creating their
8
subtitles. This is in addition to the dialogue list for the program that needs to be translated
(Cintas, Remael 2007: 79).
One of communication's benefits is its ability to adapt, and despite its volatility, speech is
rooted in the community in which it is produced. For films, especially those attempting to
present a genuine image of society, this makes it even more compelling. As a result, this
mutability is frequently reflected in cinema language in its strictly linguistic sense. As a
result, linguistic decisions in movies are never made at random. Through peculiarities and the
socio-cultural and geographic markers in characters' speech, which have an impact on
grammar, syntax, vocabulary, pronunciation, and intonation, we can learn something about
their personalities and backgrounds (Cintas, Remael: 185).
“Most subtitles display a preference for conventional, neutral word order, and simple well-
formed stereotypical sentences. This is one of the reasons why many of the interpersonal
functions of dialogue get lost in the subtitles: they are perceived to relate to form rather than
content” (ib.). This statement proves that subtitle instructions focus on form rather than the
message of a certain scene/dialogue, and precisely those instructions impede the possibility of
a more realistic interpretation of the characters and the message of a specific scene from a
film or TV series.
Before getting into some examples of subtitling requirements in the following chapter, it is
advantageous to know that everything mentioned so far is no more than a current overview of
a field that is continuously evolving in sync with numerous impactors such as technological
developments, culture, younger generations etc. As soon as any of these factors slightly
changes, it is possible to approach subtitling from a brand new point of view and to have
different rules applied. The best way to progress in this profession is to be up-to-date with
9
what is appreciated among the viewers, to accept the novelties and to be open to the idea of
adapting to possible changes.
The minimum duration of Netflix subtitles is 5/6 (five-sixths) of a second per subtitle event
(e.g. 20 frames for 24fps), and the maximum duration is 7 seconds per subtitle event. The
lines are supposed to be kept down to one, but they can be in two (maximum) if necessary.
The line should be separated/broken: after punctuation marks, before conjunctions and before
prepositions. The line should not separate: a noun from an article, a noun from an adjective, a
first name from a last name, a verb from a subject pronoun, a prepositional verb from its
preposition, and a verb from an auxiliary, a reflexive pronoun or negation (ib.).
When it comes to positioning, all subtitles should be center-justified and placed at either the
top or bottom of the screen, except for Japanese, where vertical positioning is allowed. Also,
key names and phrases/formality tables must be created and used for translation to ensure
consistency across episodes and seasons (ib.).
Netflix credits are usually not subtitled unless instructed otherwise (if it is not specifically
requested), and the main titles are subtitled as instructed in the themed style guide of the
1
Source of the mentioned rules: https://partnerhelp.netflixstudios.com/hc/en-us/articles/215758617-
Timed-Text-Style-Guide-General-Requirements (Accessed 7th September 2023)
10
respective language. As far as money mentions are concerned, they should remain in the
same currency when subtitled (ib.).
In the continuation of this work, the instructions for translating Netflix content into Croatian
language will be introduced to show everything that subtitlers have to consider while working
on the translation for Croatian viewers.
Acronyms should be written without periods between letters: BBC, CIA, SAD, and
characters should be limited to 42 per line.
2
Source of the mentioned rules: https://partnerhelp.netflixstudios.com/hc/en-
us/articles/115002790368-Croatian-Timed-Text-Style-Guide (Accessed 8th September 2023)
11
emphasis on specific words. Subtitles should be within a maximum of two lines, while text
should usually be kept to one line unless it exceeds the character limitation (ib.).
never be in italics nor split into multiple subtitle events. Furthermore, episode titles are not
supposed to be translated if they do not appear on screen/are not voiced over, and for titles of
published works, official or well-known translations should be used – on the contrary, they
should be left in the original language (ib.).
Particular instructions like the first and last one mentioned above are in focus. If they are
analyzed more closely, they contradict themselves in a way. While the first one suggests not
to censor anything, the last one states that deliberate misspellings and mispronunciations
should not be translated – this brings up the dilemma about the content being censored in a
certain sense.
After analyzing the theoretical background on subtitling and seeing some actual requirements
that subtitlers must follow, it is time to shift focus on language. Understanding different
aspects of language (such as formality, tone, and style) is indispensable when working on any
kind of translation. An enriched knowledge about communication methods, rules and
applications helps the subtitler in delivering a high quality product (translation). However,
despite being familiar with language in theory, one can never be too prepared for possible
exceptions that require a change from a general approach to something more fitting for the
particular moment. In the continuation of the work, the wide range of possibilities when it
comes to language use will be discovered, as well as the distinction between formal and
informal language together with corresponding examples. It will be shown how sometimes
their usage is quite clear, while in some instances it can be challenging to decide which way
to go. Learning these facts leads to another trait that a subtitler should perhaps obtain, and
that is creativity. Creativity with merging different styles might be crucial in some subtitling
assignments – depending on the content, the message it is supposed to display, targeted
audience, cultural background and other influencing factors.
14
As the word itself implies, formal language is the one commonly used in formal situations
and while communicating with strangers or people in a higher position (for example: boss,
professor, manager etc.). “It helps to navigate conversations that need to have a formal tone
as well as academic or business writing, interviews and presentations” (Touro University,
2023). Formal language is less personal than informal language. Formal language does not
use colloquialisms, contractions or first-person pronouns such as “I” or “we”. It is used when
writing for professional or academic purposes like graduate school assignments. However,
the Cambridge Dictionary explains how there are times when writing can be very informal,
for example, when writing postcards or letters to friends, emails or text messages.
In the following chapter, some examples for both formal and informal language are shown,
together with brief explanations regarding the differences between them.
15
5.1. Examples
All of the examples used below are my own.
Example 1
Formal language:
“We regret to inform you that we were unable to proceed with your order.”
Informal language:
“We’re sorry to tell you that we couldn’t proceed with your order.”
Explanation:
Both sentences have the same meaning, but while the formal one is longer and has a formal
tone to it, the informal one is quite direct and uses contractions which make the sentence have
a more casual tone. In addition, the vocabulary is different in both cases.
Example 2
Formal language:
Informal language:
Explanation:
While both sentences are polite, the informal one does not use modal verbs like “would” to
formalize its tone.
Example 3
Formal language:
Informal language:
Explanation:
16
While “going to” and “gonna” have the same meaning, “gonna” is a slang word and it is used
exclusively in informal communication.
Example 4
Formal language:
Informal language:
Explanation:
The choice of vocabulary is modified depending on the formality of the situation. Another
interesting fact is that the informal sentence tends to be longer than the formal one due to
paraphrasing formal words (in this case “I said I was sorry’’ instead of “I apologize”).
Example 5
Formal language:
Informal language:
Explanation:
The use of personal pronouns is usually avoided in formal language, which indicates to a
more common usage of passive voice.
Overall, the distinction between formal and informal language lies in the level of formality
and context. The bottom requirement is for the speaker to determine which one is appropriate
in which situation, as well as for the subtitler to recognize when to use more complex ways of
constructing sentences and when to simplify the translation. In order to do that, the subtitler
must know how to adapt the language according to the targeted audience and the message to
be conveyed. Since this work primarily deals with subtitling content from the English
language into Croatian, the next chapter will provide a closer look on the English language
register and Croatian functional styles.
17
On the one hand, a formal register is used in professional or formal settings. Some of the
characteristics are complex vocabulary, complete sentences, specific terminology, avoidance
of contractions, and adherence to grammar and punctuation rules. The formal register is the
one commonly used in academic writing, official documents and business contexts. On the
other hand, an informal register is commonly used in personal or casual settings such as
friendly, family and other non-formal situations. Furthermore, it requires simple vocabulary,
does not demand avoidance of contractions or colloquialisms, and does not adhere to strict
grammar rules. Moreover, a neutral register also exists, and it falls right in the middle
between formal and informal. Neutral register is the one most commonly used and, in some
instances, it is not easy to distinguish it from other registers. One of the reasons for this may
be due to the fact that it contains characteristics of both formal and informal registers, and
detailed observance is sometimes necessary in order to enlist certain conversations into one
of the three registers.
However, even if register types can be divided and each type has a certain set of rules, it is
easy for the types to intertwine depending on the situation, speakers, emotions and every
other aspect of the communication. It can be said that style is closely related to register, but
there is a difference between the two, as briefly explained by Bernd Kortmann in the work A
Handbook of Varieties of English (2005):
Scientific style (znanstveni stil) is characterized by the lowest degree of individual freedom
and therefore the highest degree of objectivity (Silić 2006: 44). The scientific style must be
both formal and substantive in accordance with its role, i.e. that the language is not created
according to the wishes of the person who creates or corrects the language, but according to
the wishes of the content of the text of the scientific style (Silić 2006: 63). Some general
characteristic vocabulary for scientific style in Croatian language would include: znanost
(Science), istraživanje (research), teorija (theory), rezultat (result), zaključak (conclusion)
etc. Other vocabulary would differ depending on the field of study (e.g. Geology, Medicine,
Astronomy and so on). Among other syntactic structures, scientific style tends to use passive
voice, nominalizations, complex sentences, subordination, and depersonalization.
Passive voice is frequently used in scientific writing to emphasize the action or results rather
than the doer. In Croatian, it is constructed similarly to English, where the object of the active
sentence becomes the subject in the passive sentence. For example:
Nominalizations involve turning verbs or adjectives into nouns, often to create abstract and
formal language. In Croatian, this is achieved by using noun forms of verbs and adjectives.
For example:
“Subordinate and dependent clauses are frequently used in complex sentence structures found
in scientific writing to offer context or clarify connections between concepts” (CD). There are
many different types of complex sentence structures that can be used in Croatian, such as
19
In business letters and emails, formal salutations are used to address recipients, often
including titles and last names. For example:
The precise structures used may change based on the communication context and objectives,
but the essential objective is to communicate clearly and professionally at all times.
What happened?
Who was/were the participants?
Where did it happen?
When did it happen?
Why did it happen?
Example:
,,Ključna utakmica posljednjeg kola švedske lige između Malmöa i Elfsborga, koja je trebala
odrediti ovogodišnjeg pobjednika natjecanja, prekinuta je zbog nereda na tribinama nakon
završetka prvog poluvremena. U poluvremenu utakmice došlo je do bakljade navijača
Malmöa, zbog čega se stvorio veliki dimni oblak. Tada se na razglasu stadiona oglasio
službeni spiker i obavijestio navijače da napuste tribine stadiona, upalio se i požarni alarm,
ali navijači nisu htjeli napustiti stadion.” (Jutarnji.hr3, November 13th, 2023.)
Translation:
“The key match of the Football All-Swedish between Malmö and Elfsborg, which was
supposed to determine this year's winner of the competition, was stopped due to disorder in
the stands after the end of the first half. In the half-time, Malmö fans lit up torches which
created a large smoke cloud. Then the official announcer informed the fans to leave the
stands of the stadium, the fire alarm also went off, but the fans did not want to leave the
stadium”.
The news answers the key questions and provides the necessary information for the audience.
3
Source of the article: https://www.jutarnji.hr/ (accessed 13th November 2023)
21
Metaphors and other forms of figurative language are frequently used to create vivid and
imaginative descriptions.
For example:
Translation:
Since a door is an inanimate object, it cannot make human sounds. Therefore, saying that the
door “screamed” is a metaphor. In addition to metaphor, symbolism and allegory may be
incorporated to convey deeper meaning and provoke thought, while repetition of words,
phrases, or motifs can be used for emphasis and rhythm. Furthermore, literary works often
rely heavily on dialogue since it gives characters a chance to express who they are and
advances the plot. Also, they may deliberately include ambiguity, inviting readers to interpret
and engage with the text on multiple levels and use inversion of word order for poetic or
rhetorical effect.
Further examples:
In addition, conversational style (razgovorni stil) is a functional language style that is used in
everyday communication. The content of the conversational style is everyday life, and its
22
This example shows how greeting someone has a quite casual tone to it, as well as asking
questions. Naturally, contractions are present since they are a crucial element in casual
conversation. This way is used both in text and speech. Furthermore, when it comes to asking
questions, conversational style allows for more informal questions being asked. It is surely
not a way of communicating with someone formally. However, there could be situations
where the way of communicating should be formal, but it is not (e.g. the director of a
company allows his/her employees to talk to him/her as if they are friends and does not
require formal behaviour), situations like this put in doubt the whole system of rules for
functional styles. There may not exist strict rules for time and place of usage at all, only a
gravitation towards certain rules due to the majority of cases.
Example 2
Translation: “Come on, relax, everything is ok.” or “I am having a really bad day.”
Conversational style allows the speaker to express his/her emotions about a situation and to
give some casual orders to the person they are talking to. Moreover, Croatian language is
tremendously welcoming to foreign words, which can be seen solely from the fact that the
word “ok” is well established in its everyday vocabulary. There are lots of other words that
23
speakers of Croatian language borrowed from English language and have normalized using
them in everyday communication. Some of the mentioned words are “thanks”, “sorry” and
“cool”, which are written as ,,tenks”, ,,sori” and ,,kul” in Croatian, as well as swear words
like “shit” (,,šit”) and “fuck” (,,fak”) that are often used in casual interactions. Interestingly
enough, particular words like that are sometimes left as they are in the original, rather than
being fully translated.
Example 3
In conversational style, colloquialisms are quite common. Words like: perilica za rublje,
stolno računalo, pećnica, and kalkulator will be replaced with: veš mašina, kompjuter,
rerna/relna (depending on where the person is from), and digitron, which are the colloquial
terms for the listed words. Precisely because of this, according to Proleksis enciklopedija
(2014), conversational language style is also called kolokvijalni jezik, which means
“colloquial language” (Proleksis enciklopedija4, November 19th, 2023). It is the language we
use to communicate in everyday situations - at home, on the street, in the store, etc. Its basis
can be the speech of any region or the standard language. The style is usually simple, but it
can also be diverse, lively and expressive.
Overwiev:
With all this being said, it is safe to say that functional styles are not “black or white”, that is,
that they are not necessarily completely formal nor completely informal. Most of the time, the
amount of formality depends on individual situations. However, due to its high level of
potential informality, conversational style can be beneficial in subtitling. Since conversational
language tends to be more simple and natural, content being subtitled in a conversational way
could make it easier for the audience to comprehend and relate to the scene. Further,
conversational language often goes straight to the point, which gives the subtitles the ability
to be briefer, and that is beneficial considering the limited time and space for subtitles.
Similarly, the language used in conversations is made for specific participants and situations,
and subtitle creators should also always consider the target audience. Lastly, the
conversational style captures the realistic ways of communicating in real life, while subtitles
attempt to be as realistic, engaging, and relatable as possible. Precisely because of these facts,
the research part in the next section was created with the objective to evaluate whether the
usage of conversational language in subtitling is perceived as being more authentic, relatable,
4
Source: https://proleksis.lzmk.hr/4691/. Accessed 19th November 2023).
24
and easier to comprehend than standard language. Also, in order to analyze whether the
viewers feel more engaged with the subtitled content or they simply do not have preferences
in respect of the formality of language. In other words, the aim of the research is to examine
and compare perceived authenticity, comprehension, engagement, emotional impact and
cultural relevance by seeing how viewers react to watching the same content subtitled in two
different ways: conversational and standard.
7. Methodology
The aim of this research was to investigate the viewers’ reactions to interlingual subtitles
when it comes to the usage of standard and informal (conversational) language. As mentioned
earlier, translators often use formal or standard language when subtitling content, and the
main question to be examined was – is that what the audience wants? Bearing in mind that
the viewers are supposed to “not notice” that the subtitles are present and should not have to
stop and think about what exactly is going on in the dialogue, the suggestion is for the
subtitles to be adjusted to the conversational language that viewers use in real life. The
following questions were related to the way of understanding the emotions, humor and other
elements influencing the actual message of certain dialogues – should formal language be
chosen over slang, cursing, jargon and other non-formal elements only because it is meant to
be displayed on screen? More often than not, this raises the possibility that the actual joke or
intensity of emotion will be “lost in translation” and therefore will not fully transmit the
writer’s message.
the questioned audience included participants of different age groups and different
study/work fields. A total of twenty-eight (28) people watched the video twice. One time with
subtitles written in standard language, and one time with subtitles written in conversational
language. After watching both videos, they answered questions from a questionnaire
designed specifically to examine the audience’s emotions towards the two different ways of
subtitling. There were seven close-ended questions and one multiple-choice question (see
Section 7.2). As participants completed the survey, their responses were automatically
collected and stored in a Google Sheets document linked to the Google Form. The results are
shown in Section 7.2. below. The aim of this research was to contribute valuable insights to
the field of media studies, subtitling practices, and audience reception, ultimately helping in
the further development of subtitling strategies that resonate effectively with modern viewers.
00:01
Jane: Unbelievable.
00:08
00:10
00:12
Jesse: I got the money and I'm totally good for it for, like, ever. Come on, yo, can you please,
please just help a brother out?
00:13
Jane: Yo, my dad's not really a "make exceptions" kind of guy. Trust me.
00:21
00:25
Jane: Owns the place. I manage it. Pen on paper, that's what I need. Or go run your game
somewhere else.
00:26
Jesse: Dude, I got nowhere else to go. This is it. And I got no game, all right? I just need a
chance. Look, my folks, they kicked me out. I'm a disappointment, apparently. Didn't meet
their expectations, again. So, you know, now I'm persona non gratis or whatever. But you
know what? I'm a good person and I work hard. I will pay you every month and I will pay
you on time. I will not mess this up, okay? I swear.
00:34
Jane: Rent just went up. A hundred more a month. That's the cash price.
01:16
01:21
Jane: And, in addition to the first and last, I want two more months. DBAA fee,
nonrefundable.
01:27
01:33
01:43
Jesse: Gotcha.
01:45
01:46
Jesse: Really?
27
01:47
Jane: And don't think for one second you have squatters' rights, because you don't. If you
blow this, I want you gone. I know guys that'll have your skinny ass out back by the dumpster
faster than you can blink.
01:49
Gle...
Nevjerojatno.
ću uvijek, sigurno.
pomoći u nevolji?
vjeruj mi.
Tvoj tata?
On je vlasnik stana,
ja upravljam njime.
samo ovo.
i naporno radim.
na vrijeme.
Kunem se.
To je cijena za gotovinu.
Da. Može.
U redu.
Razumijem.
- Zbilja?
želim da nestaneš.
Vidi ovaj...
Nevjerojatno.
ću doslovno uvijek.
ne pravi iznimke.
Tvoj tata?
Stan je njegov,
32
ja ga iznajmljujem.
To je to.
i naporno radim.
Plaćat ću ti redovno i to
33
na vrijeme.
Obećajem.
Cijena za keš je
To! Može.
Dobro.
Nećeš požaliti.
Kužim.
- Ma da?
1)
No
4%
Yes
96%
As expected, the majority of the participants noticed there is a difference in the two
subtitles. The acknowledgment of the existence of the distinction makes this
questionnaire relevant and thus provides the ability for the theory to be further
researched. After establishing that there are two different uses of language included in
the subtitling process, the participants continued to answer questions based on what
they saw, wanted to see, expected, preferred, suggested, and they also had the
possibility to answer an open ended question in which they could explain in more
detail why they preferred one translation over the other.
36
2)
Yes
100%
3)
Standard
25%
Conversational
75%
Although this outcome was expected and is the one that provides the most crucial
answer to the research questions, the percentages are particularly thought-provoking
considering the diversity of the participants. Perhaps the results would be different if
37
the questionnaire was only in hands of exclusively young adults or exclusively older
adults.
4)
Without subtitles
27%
With subtitles
73%
Since a total of seventy-five (75) percent of the participants answered how they often
watch content with interlingual subtitles, the total results of the questionnaire, that is,
the research itself, is automatically more accurate.
5)
6)
Other TV
10% 10%
Streaming devices
80%
7)
It does
not According to you, does the message of a certain scene get
matter to the audience easier/better if conversational language is
what
kind of used?
language
is used
4%
Yes
96%
39
In the answers to the open-ended question, the participants explained why they prefer a
particular way of translating over the other. These answers helped analyze more deeply the
40
feelings of the viewers towards the subject. The reasons why some of them prefer standard
subtitles were a general lean towards politeness, watching content subtitled in a standard way
out of habit, and individuals even consider it to give an impression of high quality and more
professional work, while content being translated in a conversational way may seem like a
low budget production. On the other hand, some given reasons for preferring conversational
style of language in translated content were naturalness, staying faithful to the original,
authenticity, entirely transmitting the message, better understanding and so on.
It appears that most of the participants were able to understand both standard and
conversational subtitles. However, twenty-one, that is, 75 percent of the participants preferred
the latter. Conversational subtitles likely provided a more natural and faithful representation
of the spoken language since they closely matched the way the original content was
presented. This preference suggests that the participants value an authentic and relatable
viewing experience when it comes to subtitles. Moreover, a number of them stated that
translating vulgarisms, slang, and other conversational elements in subtitles is important,
rather than avoiding them, in order to preserve the whole impression of a certain scene as
well as the personalities of the characters. Eighteen participants of the survey indicated that
they frequently watch films and TV series with interlingual subtitles, while the rest of them
do not watch content with subtitles or they watch it with subtitles that are written in the same
language as the original content. Furthermore, a sizable portion of them stated that their
favourite medium for watching content with subtitles was streaming devices. This shows a
widespread practice of using subtitles to improve the viewing experience, perhaps for reasons
like boosting language proficiency, accent understanding, or conversation clarity. The
preference for streaming devices also indicates a shift towards digital platforms for
consuming entertainment. Lastly, twenty-six out of twenty-eight participants expressed how
they consider conversational style to be better at transmitting the message of the scene to the
viewers, while the rest of them disagree or have no opinion regarding the topic.
The presented results imply that subtitling carries not only the responsibility of faithfully
translating, spotting and adapting, but also having in mind the audience and their
expectations, since audience groups differ in expectations according to age, culture, current
social trends, history, religion and so much more. Possibilities of further research on this
topic are endless if one decides to focus on any particular aspect. For instance, exploring how
some cultures are more welcoming than others to the idea of conversational language, or
maybe even explicit language, being part of the subtitling process. The same can be applied
41
to research that is based on the age of the questioned audience, ethnicity, gender or other
variables.
8. Conclusion
The aim of this research was to explore the reception of interlingual subtitles, that is, to
examine how viewers would react to a certain content being translated in two completely
different ways and therefore to get some insight on what is expected, liked, disliked, possible
or maybe even not important from the audience’s point of view. After reviewing some
theoretical background on translating in general, and establishing the connection between
technology development and translating techniques, first it was necessary to look further into
audiovisual translation in order to learn how subtitling, which belongs to the AVT family,
even came to exist and how many people tried to define and categorize it over the years.
There are lots of ways to classify subtitling, as well as numerous components that stand
behind each and every subtitled content. Secondly, the task carriers in subtitling and the
challenges, rules, expectations, and other requirements to be met while working in this
particular field were mentioned, as well as specific quidelines certain companies have
prepared for subtitlers. The word “subtitler” gives a quite clear idea on what it means as a
profession, but this thesis points out that it is not as simple as it sounds. It is important to
repeat that a subtitler not only turns speech into written text, but also does the job of a
translator, spotter, adaptor, lector, and there might even be more to it if one makes an effort to
see it from different perspectives. Furtherly, since the main topic of the research was
translation reception, it was also essential to acquire knowledge of different ways of
communication, more precisely, about formal and informal language and their usage in
everyday situations. By gaining better understanding of functional styles and focusing on
conversational functional style, the idea of comparing it with standard language surfaced and
led to the creation of an experiment that would show how viewers would react to a certain
content being interlingually subtitled in two different ways. In other words, a questionnaire
was created to get some concrete answers on what the audience likes to see in subtitling. One
short video was translated from the English language into Croatian, once in a standard way,
and once in a conversational way. The participants watched both subtitled videos and,
according to what they saw and preferred, they answered questions that were carefully put
together in order to collect accurate results. Results of the survey have shown that the
majority, that is, seventy-five percent (75) of the participants, consider conversational style to
be a more adequate fit for the scene. Since the participants were of different age groups,
42
professions and areas, it is safe to say that the results could have gone in any other direction.
Another interesting fact is that the minority that voted standard language to be a better fit for
the scene, consists of participants who happen to be older adults, while the other questioned
group consists of young adults. This fact shows that different generations expect different
approaches when it comes to subtitling and that it would be interesting to explore whether
this example was only a coincidence or the results would be similar if there were more
participants with an equal number of younger and older adults. In conclusion, this research
examined only one of the numerous possibilities when it comes to using formal and informal
language in subtitling. It proved that subtitling goes beyond being a simple means of
adaptation and that it deals with innumerable challenges along the way. Moreover, it proved
that the audience does observe details and has preferences concerning language usage in
subtitles, as well as that being familiar with the target audience can make a vast impact on the
perception and success of the final product (in this case, translated content).
43
References
Cambridge University Press. (2017). Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge University Press.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/. Accessed 20 September 2023.
Croatian Timed Text Style Guide. (n.d.). Netflix | Partner Help Center.
https://partnerhelp.netflixstudios.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002790368-Croatian-
Timed-Text-Style-Guide. Accessed 20 September 2023.
Díaz Cintas, J., Remael A. (2007). Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling. London. Routledge.
English Timed Text Style Guide. (n.d.). Netflix | Partner Help Center.
https://partnerhelp.netflixstudios.com/hc/en-us/articles/217350977-English-Timed-
Text-Style-Guide
Flaubert, G. (2017). Gospođa Bovary. Split: Logos.
Gläser, R. (1984). The translation aspect of phraseological units in English and German.
Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics 18:123.
Gilligan, V. (Creator). (2009). Breaking Bad: Breakage (Season 2, Episode 5). AMC.
Hurwitz, J., Schlossberg, J., & Heald, H. (Creators). (2018–present). Cobra Kai. Overbrook
Entertainment.
Jutarnji.hr. (2023). Naslovnica. (n.d.). https://www.jutarnji.hr/. Accessed 15 September
2023.
Kortmann, B. (2004). A Handbook of Varieties of English. Mouton de Gruyter.
Kranjčević, S.S. (1898). Izabrane pjesme, Oproštaj. Zagreb. Matica hrvatska.
Munday, J. (2008). Introducing Translation Studies, Theories and applications, Second
Edition. London. Routledge.
Oxford University Press. (2017). Oxford Dictionaries.
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Accessed 20 September 2023.
Safran, S. (Producer). (2009). Gossip Girl: Carnal Knowledge (Season 2, Episode 17). In
Schwartz, J., & Savage, S. (Executive Producers), Gossip Girl. Warner Bros.
Television.
Silić, J. (2006). Funkcionalni stilovi hrvatskog jezika. Zagreb. Disput.
Touro University. (2023). www.touro.edu. (n.d.). https://www.touro.edu/
Accessed 20 September 2023
Van Dusen, C. (Creator). (2022). Bridgerton (Season 2, Episode 7). In Shondaland
(Executive Producer), Bridgerton. Netflix.
Vujić A. (Editor in Chief). (2014.). Proleksis enciklopedija: Razgovorni jezik.
44