Q2 2024 - Premier ATP PMP Practice Exam Questions
Q2 2024 - Premier ATP PMP Practice Exam Questions
Number
Agile
Hybrid
Predictive
X - Agnostic
X00603 2.15 A project has been initiated, and the project team is ready
to get to work, but all their vendor contracts are stuck in
procurement. Which two actions should the project
manager take? (Choose 2)
X00606 2.9 A project has just been initiated. It has two key
stakeholders and should be completed within 18 months.
Stakeholder A wants to complete work early—in 14
months—and proposes saving time by using an untested
technology during development. Stakeholder B prefers
staying within the 18-month timeline and using a proven
technology.
The project team logged this issue in the issue log, but the
director continues to refuse access to the team, escalating
the disturbance to leadership.
D Stop all work until the legal Meet with the team to decide
issue is resolved. on continuing the work.
Option C Option D Option E
Note the delay as an issue in Create contracts to be Pay vendors from the project
the issue log. authorized by the project. contingency budget.
Instruct the designers to Log the issue and record it in Restrict team member
create new designs lessons learned. access to confidential
immediately. material.
Share daily reminders of the Ensure product vision and
timeline and milestones roadmap development is
informally in the team chat. done collaboratively with the
product owner and team.
Escalate the issue to the Run a simulation of the work Conduct an observation of
project sponsor to deliver a related to the ICU as a conditions in the ICU to
final decision. workaround for the test. further clarify the
requirements.
Apply a temporary solution Discuss the challenges of the Record the incident and
until the scheduler can schedule with the whole solution in the lessons
correct the error. team and decide on a better learned register.
practice for scheduling.
Work with the stakeholders Codevelop key performance Define success criteria for
to better understand their indicators (KPIs) for the the benefits delivery with the
needs. proposed benefits with the key stakeholders.
stakeholders.
Ask the organization’s Perform a cost of quality Determine the cost and
compliance team to complete (CoQ) analysis. schedule impacts.
the review.
Use the time to get ahead for Document the time and cost Adjust or tailor the iteration
the next iteration. savings and note the change planning estimation process.
in velocity.
Remind the team of their Empower the team to Delegate the task to a junior
responsibility to complete the innovate under the condition team member and offer them
work. that they get the work done. a growth opportunity soon.
Build a prototype or create a Define product changes by Perform project closure and
storyboard for testing. checking the product benefits verification.
backlog.
Take control of the meeting Send a private chat message
by asking people to raise to the team member to turn
their hands for permission to off the camera while eating
speak. and keep communications
relevant, then follow up with
a face-to-face meeting.
Managing the overall project Keeping up with customer Defining quality metrics
risk demands in a competitive
market
Conduct a cost-benefit Collaborate with the supplier Take legal action against the
analysis to identify how the to make the necessary vendor.
company can maintain changes to their labor source
sustainability and still be and continue with the current
profitable. supplier.
Schedule of services for Statement of work (SOW) for Contingency funding in the
variable items each vendor project budgets
The project manager should recognize the situation as an issue and log it in the issue log. Because the iss
is related to an organizational department, escalation to the project sponsor is appropriate.
This is not a risk; it is an issue, because the contracts are not signed, and work needs to start. If the projec
manager acts on the contracts from within the project, this will create further risks. Always take the steps
within your authority and work on the problem yourself before escalating.
In this scenario, the issue is about procurement. The project manager is working with a new vendor to
determine the relationship as part of the Conduct Procurements process. This means working with the
organization’s procurement department to determine a suitable contract with the vendor. The procurement
process includes working with the organization’s procurement department, conducting a make-or-buy
analysis, and setting up a master service agreement (MSA) that will govern work with the vendor.
This project manager has two stakeholders with conflicting schedule requirements. It’s important to find the
common ground and to validate the schedule requirements for the work at the same time. This can be don
by reviewing the critical path and schedule compression options to determine the actual shortest duration o
time it will take to complete the project activities.
Performing a cost-benefit analysis is wrong because we can’t assume that saving time is going to save any
money. The technology is probably going to add cost, even with the savings in resources. And it will add ri
so you would need to include a risk analysis. Tailoring a hybrid project with agile test iterations is risky
because you can’t jump into action right away without consulting stakeholders—or spend money, time, and
resources without approval. This may be a great idea for organizational learning, but you probably need to
get permission first to take such big steps. Finally, while project managers can perform business analysis
roles such as feasibility studies, this project has already started and, hence, is already deemed feasible.
This project manager is in a new situation and needs to build cohesive teams quickly. First, the project
manager should, with the team, conduct an analysis of the team structures to find out what is missing or
wrong and what can be improved. This will help build the team relationship. A conversation with the PMO
and organizational stakeholders to understand the company culture or structure can be partial answers, bu
the complete answer is to analyze the problem and determine how to improve the situation. A project chart
has no bearing on team dynamics.
First, we need to determine what happened. This is best done using root-cause analysis with the internal
team and stakeholders. Then, all stakeholders can be invited to collaboratively work toward a resolution.
Because of the complex nature of the project and the number of stakeholders from different organizations,
everyone should be involved at the point of resolution once the problem is understood. Escalation is not ye
appropriate until you rule out being able to solve the problem yourself.
As a good practice in communication with multiple parties involved in a conflict, a facilitated group discussi
eliminates siloed conversations that can lead to misunderstandings and more complexity.
Despite the potential high drama of this scenario, this is a simple case of a problem that needs to be
addressed. To safeguard the future of this project, the project manager should log the issue, remind the te
of organizational rules, update the compliance requirements for the project, and revise the team charter to
ensure the team is mindful of the rules going forward. Even though this was a costly and embarrassing
mistake, the project manager is the steward of the project and must take steps to ensure its success.
New designs are outside of the project scope and moving to restrict access to the confidential designs wou
probably not allow the team members to do their jobs. The project manager needs to be able to trust their
team and the team members must uphold the value of honesty and exhibit ethical behavior. This is a core
value of the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.
The strongest motivators for a team include a shared mission or purpose within a cohesive team
environment. Motivation is about keeping people involved with purpose, not for fun or distraction. Structure
such as timeboxes can facilitate or expedite work, but this question is about motivation. In the context of th
project, a fail-fast approach will not work within an aggressive timeline in complex and highly regulated
market conditions. This will take steady leadership and a motivated team devoted to the vision.
The team should tailor the project to provide accountability to the schedule, but with scope flexibility for the
design phase. They can enable the incorporation of feedback iteratively from a large volume of potential en
users. The iterative approach to design with prototype creation could be a good solution, but this option do
not include an approach or plan for implementation.
The ICU manager’s participation is needed to fulfill the scope of the project, which is to achieve the best
schedule to upgrade and automate some of the daily cleaning tasks required by law. The project team mus
negotiate a solution that involves this stakeholder for the project to succeed; project success is critical, or t
hospital will be noncompliant with the law. Therefore, the project manager should determine how complian
can be met under the set of constraints.
The issue should already be flagged as a high priority; it is time to act. Running a simulation may work as a
workaround, but this project will require implementation when complete, and since the department was
skipped, success of the implementation cannot be guaranteed. Asking the project sponsor to apply their
power and influence to deliver a final decision negates the department head’s objections, which seem to
have merit—in a hospital, patient care and practitioner safety may supersede a predetermined cleaning
schedule.
We need an immediate response to address the issue and improve the scheduling process for the future.
The team can sit together with the scheduler and decide how to create an appropriate schedule. The proje
manager should answer team member A’s complaint as well as coach the scheduler on the dangerous
consequences of a scheduling error like this. Recording the incident in the lessons learned register will not
resolve the problem, but it is a useful step for learning on future projects.
Sometimes project teams must perform the role of the business analyst, validating the proposal or project
refining scope as the project is initiated. In this case, the benefits and business requirements should be
clarified before the project work begins.
Ensuring valuable outcomes for stakeholders means maintaining a collaborative relationship that focuses o
value delivery. Establishing success criteria for benefits delivery, again with the stakeholders, helps ensure
their buy-in. The other options could also be used to keep stakeholders informed, but they are not the
methods for deriving value.
Informing the sponsor is the right decision, but you need to be prepared with the cost and schedule impact
the sponsor can make a decision.
Project managers—and not anyone else—are responsible and accountable for ensuring projects comply w
all relevant laws, regulations, and standards. Risks of noncompliance have some of the most serious
consequences for projects, relative to other risk types. Whether the issue occurred during a project
manager’s tenure or before their arrival, it is up to them to make the correction and ensure the project mee
all required regulations. In this case, the issue needs to be escalated to the sponsor for the decision.
This project uses a hybrid approach, so while it is not clear how this team is planning their work for iteration
we should assume that their guidelines apply to agile iteration planning. No new work should be added
during an iteration in an agile approach. However, it would be fine to spend time on nonfunctional tasks like
clearing technical debt or ensuring that the team’s work adheres to code standards and technical
documentation. The team should not finish work early. This team is in the early stages of working together
so they are likely still figuring out their way of working and their velocity. In any case, the estimation of work
wrong here and the team should adjust this.
As the leader of this team, the project manager should hold the team accountable to their responsibilities
while motivating them to complete the work of the current project. Perhaps this team is bored or
unchallenged, but they still need to complete the work. No matter how it is structured, the repetitive task is
unavoidable. Motivation is different from incentivization. We should focus on empowering individuals and
teams to have a sense of ownership and common purpose for the work. Delegation to a junior team memb
may be a workable solution for the project, but this option should only be used if the team member will gain
something. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and Herzburg’s Motivation-Hygiene theory are helpful here to
understand the value and principles of motivation. For the junior team member especially, the hygiene
factors are important, while the team in general needs to build their esteem and work on self-actualization.
The opportunity to innovate gives them that.
The SPI = 1.2, which indicates that the project is ahead of the deadline with a factor of 1.2. We know that
80% of the work is complete. The time consumed can be calculated as follows: 8 months / (divided by) 1.2
6.666 months. Therefore, the current time is July since the start date is 1 January.
The CPI is 1.1 and the rate of realization is 80%, which corresponds to a planned value (PV) of 80,000 –
80% of US$100,000. The actual cost is less than 80,000 since the CPI is > 1.
This calculation assumes that the project progresses at a constant rate during the timeline.
Note: Even though these and other formulas can be accomplished with automated tools, project managers
should know how to think and consider the whole picture of how the project is progressing and how
effectively the team is working.
The correct sequence and relationship of the actions involve validating deliverables with the customer and
verifying the quality of the deliverables through quality control metrics. Readiness for delivery is determined
based on these criteria.
This team member is not self-aware, and the project manager should take immediate action during the
meeting to stop the behavior that is creating a conflict and a potential risk with the customer present. The
meeting should be able to resume as intended. Coaching after the meeting about appropriate behavior
reinforces the team’s norms. Ignoring the behavior is equal to doing nothing, so the disruptive behavior wil
continue.
If tight controls, oversight, and careful planning are just as important to project success as meeting custom
requirements, then this project manager might have a difficult time keeping up with the pace of change from
the changing requirements while applying those controls, oversights, and careful plans. Even the most rob
change control process may not be responsive or quick enough to process changes in a timely way. If
customer requirements are changing all the time, then the scope is not fixed; it is flexible and needs to be
treated as an evolving set of requirements.
Demanding stakeholders are challenging, no matter the project approach used, as is managing overall risk
This project manager should pivot to use a hybrid development approach to progressively elaborate the
scope and tailor the change control process to be lightweight, but with strict controls and oversight applied
budget and quality.
The goals of this project are to regularize the company’s ability to operate, so we can assume the project is
critical and about redress. The project manager will need to conduct business analysis activities to determi
what it will cost to maintain operations in the current market conditions. The project manager will also need
work with internal stakeholders to create clear guidelines, so operations do not run afoul of the law again.
Because this project is about redress, the campaign to reimagine the company’s profile does not fit the
vision. Collaboration with the supplier is a high-risk option since it has violated an international law. This wi
put the company’s reputation at further risk. Legal action may be an outcome of the project, but it will not
address the negative publicity or correct the supply chain.\
Agile budgeting focuses on increments, so a fixed-price contract will not work. The suitable options include
master service agreement for known costs that will be incurred across the three projects and options that
grant flexibility while working with vendors. Contingency funding is for known risks, not for project expense
When negotiating agreements for a project, the first task is determining the boundaries for the negotiation
that agreement. In this case, once the team knows who is attending the sporting event, they can determine
their needs. All of the other listed tasks should be completed, but you first should understand what is need
by the stakeholders or end users so that the appropriate housing choices can be made within the project
constraints.
While the team member’s behavior is a confidential matter being handled by HR, the project manager shou
do something about the way the matter is affecting other team members and should handle this in a private
manner with a face-to-face meeting with the individual. It is not enough to monitor the situation, even
proactively, at this point since other team members are affected—it is now an issue affecting team morale.
The further risk here is that team performance could soon be affected. Retrospectives are an occasion to
discuss improvements within the team, work, and processes, but as this is a sensitive, personal matter, the
meeting is best.
Public stakeholders of projects that will have a direct impact on a community need to be consulted
meaningfully at the start of a project. At that time, it is possible to explore and explain the project vision and
benefits to them, as well as prepare them for any possible negative impacts.
The first step is to prioritize the issues according to impacts to scope, schedule, cost, and quality, and then
make decisions on how to address them. The team should understand the complexity of the situation befo
making any decision to escalate or change the schedule.
The project manager should seek advice from the legal department. The severity of the situation requires t
leadership and facilitation of the project manager, and not a consensus of the team. The project should
continue as the legal experts investigate the claim and the matter is hopefully resolved. The cost-benefit
analysis would help to determine the potential benefit of continuing in the case of liability and a financial
penalty occurs, but the action that should be taken now is legal consultation.