Viability of DISCOMs (13th Oct) - without Annexure
Viability of DISCOMs (13th Oct) - without Annexure
Conference of Power and New & Renewable Energy Ministers of States and UTs
Viability of DISCOMs 1
Agenda
▪ Introduction
▪ Key Impacts
▪ Way Forward
Viability of DISCOMs 2
Introduction
• Power Distribution remains the most critical link in the power sector value chain
• The impact of any inefficiency within power distribution flows to all upstream players in the value chain which equally
affects their operations and financial viability
• Financial performance of DISCOMs at aggregate level has remained a matter of concern
• Accumulated losses of DISCOMs were at INR 5,16,336 Cr. as on 31.03.2021
• Overview of the key financial and operational performance indicators for DISCOMs at aggregate level are as follows
Parameter Units FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21
Financial Performance
Annual Profit/ (Losses) INR Cr. (47,526) (33,894) (27,966) (49,103) (31,672) (50,281)
ACS-ARR Gap (accrual basis) INR/ kWh 0.54 0.58 0.50 0.70 0.60 0.71
ACS-ARR Gap (cash basis) INR/ kWh 0.73 0.90 0.60 0.86 0.83 0.95
Total Borrowings INR Cr. 4,21,087 4,17,106 4,64,422 5,00,022 5,14,237 5,86,194
Operational Performance
Billing Efficiency % 80.69 81.69 83.07 83.91 85.36 84.07
Collection Efficiency % 94.24 93.65 94.50 93.26 92.64 92.40
AT&C Loss % 23.96 23.50 21.50 21.74 20.93Viability of DISCOMs 22.32
3
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
Viability of DISCOMs 4
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
Gap
0.40
5.00 0.20
3.00 0.00
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
ACS (on sales units) ABR Gap
Source: PFC
State/DISCOM wise on ABR, ACS on Sales Unit and Gap provided in Annexure
• DISCOM’s tariff realized are not in line with their cost structure
• Non-achievement of performance targets on T&D loss, O&M etc. has led to various disallowance in ARR by
concerned regulators
• Involvement of State Governments in tariff fixation exercise has also led to non-increase in tariff
Viability of DISCOMs 5
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
0.95
10.00 0.90 0.86 1.00
0.83
9.00 0.73 0.80
8.00 0.60
7.00 0.60
6.14 6.19
Gap
6.00
6.00 5.31 5.38 5.50 5.15 5.31 5.24 0.40
4.57 4.91
5.00 4.48
0.20
4.00
3.00 0.00
FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21
ACS (on input energy) Cash Adjusted ARR (on input energy) Cash Adjusted Gap (ACS-Cash Adjusted ARR) (on input energy)
Source: PFC
State/DISCOM wise on Gap provided in Annexure
• More than 11% increase in the Cash Adjusted Gap from 2019 to 2021 (from INR 0.86/kWh to INR 0.95/kWh) thereby
implying that DISCOMs, on an average basis, are making a loss of INR 0.95/kWh per unit of input energy
Viability of DISCOMs 6
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
~39% States/ UTs have not issued Tariff Orders for FY 2022-23 before 31st March 2022
~103 Average Delay (in Days) in issuance of Tariff Orders for FY 2022-23
Source: Report on Key Regulatory Parameters of power Utilities (30th Sep 2022)
Viability of DISCOMs 8
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
14
12
T&DLoss %
10
8
6
4
2
0
South
Korea Japan Germany Italy Australia France China USA Canada UK Russia World
Africa
2017 3.47 4.04 4.95 6.01 5.89 9.53 8.02 5.46 5.68 6.45 8.21 12.15 8.4
2018 3.31 4.54 4.94 5.78 5.92 9.97 8.06 5.27 5.13 6.11 8.15 11.95 8.2
Viability of DISCOMs 9
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
• Total Debt has increased from INR 4,21,087 Cr. in FY 2015-16 to INR 5,86,194 Cr. in FY 2020-21
• The interest amount over the same period has increased from INR 46,454 Cr. to INR 55,773 Cr
• Interest cost as a percentage of total expenses of all DISCOMs is ~7.3% for FY 2020-21
4. Dependence on State Govt. Subsidies and Delay in its Disbursal
• Tariff Subsidy booked at the national level increased from INR 75,608 Cr. in FY16 to INR 1,32,416 Cr. in FY21
• Share of tariff subsidy in total revenue of DISCOMs has increased from 15.51% to 18.53% over the same period
• The total outstanding subsidy were ~INR 76,337 Cr as on 31st Mar 2022
States with subsidy billed > 25% of total revenue of DISCOMs Notable Increase in Tariff Subsidy Booked:
• MP (46%) • Rajasthan (30%) FY 2018-19 FY 2020-21
• Manipur (37%) • J&K (29%) 70%
Andhra Pradesh 6,030 Cr 10,265 Cr
• Punjab (32%) • Karnataka (29%)
69%
• Bihar (31%) Madhya Pradesh 11,615 Cr 19,595 Cr
Viability of DISCOMs 10
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
Viability of DISCOMs 11
Factors affecting DISCOMs Viability
• Corporatization alone in power sector has not led to advent of desired corporate governance practices in the
management of utility companies.
• Lack of desired corporate governance poses challenges in the form of inadequate control and strategic alignment
• The Guidelines cover a total of 37 Nos. of parameters for compliance by 44 State Owned DISCOMs
Out of 44 State owned DISCOMs, 39 DISCOMs have submitted data while 5 DISCOMs (HPSEBL, MSPDCL, TANGEDCO,
MVVNL and PuVVNL) are yet to submit data
Viability of DISCOMs 12
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DHBVNL 81% 3% 3% 14%
Compliant
TSNPDCL 49% 5% 27% 19%
Partial
APDCL 47% 8% 3% 42%
Viability of DISCOMs 14
Key Impacts
• To tide over the liquidity crisis in the power sector, GoI announced Liquidity Infusion Scheme in the year 2021.
• Inspite of infusion of INR 1,11,823 Cr. as on Mar 2022 in 16 States through this scheme*, the total outstanding GENCO
dues stands at INR 97,927 Cr. as on 31st Mar 2022.
• As on 3rd Jun 2022 (Legacy Dues), the states have reported total dues to INR 1.38 lakh Cr. which includes dues from
state GENCOs and TRANSCOs of some states (INR 73,076 Cr.) to be payable by DISCOMs.
*As on date, total loan disbursed under LIS is INR 1,12,456 Cr. for 16 States
GENCO Dues (INR Cr.)
97,927
78,567 82,841
19,667
9,124 13,833
RE
37,390 43,380 56,564
IPP
CPSE
31,963 25,628 21,696
• As on 31st Mar 2022, the total accumulated losses of the DISCOMs were about INR 5,16,336 Cr.
• Five states (Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan, UP, MP and Telangana) contribute to more than ~73% of the total accumulated
losses.
• 11 States in the country have negative net worth as on 31st March 2021
(376,147)
(411,753) (431,059)
(478,153) (507,416) (516,336)
Accumulated Losses Net Worth
Source: PFC report on Performance of Utilities
Viability of DISCOMs 16
Key Impacts
• The total accumulated debt of all DISCOMs in the country were about INR 5,86,194 Cr. as on 31st March 2021
• Five states (Tamil Nadu, UP, Rajasthan, MP and Maharashtra) contribute to almost two-third of the total debt
• The increased debt burden has led to increased interest payment
• This increased interest payment by DISCOMs further lead to worsening of their ACS-ARR gap thereby creating a
vicious cycle or a “debt trap”
4. Impact on Consumer Services
• Shortfall in customer services: Inadequacy of funds required for necessary expenses of network O&M and customer services
• Diminishing reliability/ quality of supply: DISCOMs unable to seek financing causing deferral of network augmentation
• Higher interest costs: Increased cost of borrowing by DISCOMs burdens consumers in the form of increase in tariff
• Load shedding/ supply regulation: Inability to pay GENCOs in a timely manner leads to curtailment of supply
1st Consumer Service Rating of DISCOMs (CSRD): Out of 60 DISCOMs, only 2 DISCOMs are able to secure A+. 44 DISCOMs have
been rated B or below Viability of DISCOMs 17
Case Analysis of a DISCOM (Southern Region)
Particulars FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 FY 29 FY 30
Total Revenue 79,869 78,149 87,812 90,944 98,175 1,06,011 1,14,485 1,23,650
Profit After Tax 467 (3,452) 2,132 1,473 5,384 9,060 12,868 16,969
Total Debt Service Requirement 23,853 23,605 23,557 23,327 22,779 21,993 19,303 18,703
Operating cash flows 17,281 13,070 19,374 18,237 22,655 26,789 31,190 36,069
Commitment under RDSS 3,280 3,343 5,191 432 0 0 0 0
Balance Debt Service
3,292 7,192 0 4,657 124 0 0 0
Requirement
Tariff Hike Required (%) 5.54% 9.70% 0.00% 2.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
• Considering tariff hike of 4% every year over the new tariff for FY 2022-23 and 100% loss takeover from state
government, the DISCOM would still require a tariff hike of 5.54% in FY 2022-23 and a further tariff hike of 9.70%
in FY 2023-24 and 2.10% in FY 2025-26 to service debt obligations
✓ DISCOMs having high ACS-ARR gap would require steep increase in tariff Y-O-Y to address the deteriorating
financial health and unsustainable level of debt exposure
✓ Tariff hike Y-O-Y is imminent but would only suffice to maintain Business - As - Usual for DISCOMs. Despite
several initiatives by GoI, survival of DISCOMs is increasingly becoming questionable
Viability of DISCOMs 18
GOI Initiatives to address Viability
Issues of DISCOMs
Viability of DISCOMs 19
GOI Initiatives to address Viability Issues of DISCOMs
Viability of DISCOMs 20
GOI Initiatives to address Viability Issues of DISCOMs
• RDSS would help DISCOMs improve their operational efficiencies and financial
Revamped sustainability by providing result-linked financial assistance to DISCOMs to
Distribution Sector strengthen supply structure based on meeting pre-qualifying criteria and
Scheme (RDSS) achieving basic minimum benchmarks – Prepaid smart metering, Loss reduction
and modernization works
• To tide over the liquidity crisis in the power sector, GoI announced Liquidity Infusion
Liquidity Infusion Scheme as a part of the Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan.
Scheme (LIS) • REC and PFC have sanctioned loans against an unconditional and irrevocable State
Government Guarantee. Total Disbursed: INR 1,12,456 Cr. for 16 States.
Viability of DISCOMs 22
GOI Initiatives to address Viability Issues of DISCOMs
Viability of DISCOMs 23
Way Forward
Viability of DISCOMs 24
Way Forward
Viability of DISCOMs 25
Way Forward
Compliance to SOP
Prepaid Smart Metering is to be implemented on all Govt. Offices. Essential public services like hospitals,
streetlights, and water works may be excluded
Viability of DISCOMs 26
Way Forward
Determination of Full Cost recovery tariff without subsidy and sufficient RoE
Viability of DISCOMs 27
Thank you
Viability of DISCOMs 28