MODULE-1 Research
MODULE-1 Research
Units 80 HOURS
MODULE DESCRIPTOR:
This lesson provides an introduction to research in
general by providing discussions and activities on:
• Importance of Research
Number of Hours:
80 hours
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of this module you MUST be able to:
1. Describes the characteristics of quantitative research.
Contents:
Methods of Research
To be a researcher is to be a scientist, who must think
logically or systematically; that is, your research activities
must follow a certain order, like doing inductive thinking that
makes you ponder on specific ideas first, then move to more
complex concepts like conclusions or generalizations. Or, do
the opposite of inductive thinking which is deductive
thinking that lets you start from forming generalizations to
examining details about the subject matter. These are not
the only approaches, though, that you can adhere to in
planning your research work. Depending on your topic and
purpose, you are free to choose from several approaches,
methods, and types of research you learned in your previous
research subject, Practical Research 1. (Gray 2011; Sharp
2012)
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Characteristics
Since quantitative research uses numbers and figures to
denote a particular thing, this kind of research requires you to
focus your full attention on the object of your study. Doing
this, you tend to exclude your own thoughts and feelings
about the subject or object. This is why quantitative research
Document No. 001-2020
Practical Research 2
Developed by:
Module1: Nature of Issued by:
College for Research & Technology
Inquiry and Research Page 16
CRT
is described as objective research in contrast to qualitative
research that is subjective. Characterized by objectiveness, in
which only the real or factual, not the emotional or cognitive
existence of the object matters greatly to the artist,
quantitative research is analogous to scientific or experimental
thinking. In this case, you just do not identify problems but
theorize, hypothesize, analyze, infer, and create as well.
Quantitative research usually happens in hard sciences like
physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine; qualitative research,
in soft sciences such as humanities, social sciences, education,
and psychology, among others.
Classification
Quantitative research is of two kinds: experimental and
non-experimental. Each of these has sub-types. Falling under
experimental are these specific types: true experimental,
quasi-experimental, single subject, and pre-experimental.
Quasi-experimental comes in several types such as: matched
comparative group, time series, and counterbalanced quasi-
experimental. Non-experimental research, on the other hand,
has these sub-types: survey, historical, observational,
correlational, descriptive, and comparative research.
Importance
The importance of quantitative research lies greatly in the
production of results that should reflect precise measurement
and an in-depth analysis of data. It is also useful in obtaining
an objective understanding of people, things, places, and
events in this world; meaning, attaching accurate or exact
meanings to objects or subjects, rather than inflated
meanings resulting from the researcher’s bias or personal
Document No. 001-2020
Practical Research 2
Developed by:
Module1: Nature of Issued by:
College for Research & Technology
Inquiry and Research Page 17
CRT
attachment to things related to the research. Requiring the
use of reliable measurement instruments or statistical
methods, a quantitative study enables people to study their
surroundings as objective as they can. This kind of research is
likewise an effective method to obtain information about
specified personality traits of a group member or of the group
as a whole as regards the extent of the relationship of their
characteristics and the reason behind the instability of some
people’s characteristics. (Muijs 2011; Gray 2012)
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research
Having obtained much knowledge about qualitative and
quantitative research, you are now able to compare and
contrast the two based on some standards or criteria
appearing in the following table. (Muijs 2011; Sharp 2012)
Standards Qualitative Quantitative
Mental survey of Results from social Exists in the
reality interactions physical world
Cause-effect Explained by Revealed by
relationships people’s objective automatic
desires descriptions of
circumstances or
conditions
Standards Qualitative Quantitative
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Classification
Experimental research is categorized into two: true
experimental research and quasi-experimental research. Based
on where the experimental research is done, it is either
laboratory research or field research. Your manner of selecting
the participants indicates whether it is true experimental or
quasi-experimental. The true experimental research absolutely
uses random selection in determining who among the
participants should compose the experimental group or the
control group. The quasi-experimental research adopts a
comparative technique in choosing the subjects.
The experimental group on which the treatment or
condition is applied is not chosen randomly but matched or
compared with another group whom you, the researcher,
believe as having the same characteristics as the experimental
group under treatment. Employing researcher’s influence in
sampling or subject selection, quasi-experimental research
fails to qualify as a genuine experimental research. Hence,
discoveries or findings resulting from this kind of experimental
research are susceptible to doubts. (Sharp 2012; Gray 2013)
Research Design of Non-Experimental Research
Any plan you have about a non-experimental research
Document No. 001-2020
Practical Research 2
Developed by:
Module1: Nature of Issued by:
College for Research & Technology
Inquiry and Research Page 23
CRT
must have the following aspects that take place in a
sequential manner:
1. Specify the problem or topic of your research.
2. Formulate the research problem or hypotheses.
3. Determine the dependent and independent variables.
4. Select the participants or subjects.
5. Decide on the specific type of experimental research;
meaning, whether it will be a true experimental or quasi-
experimental research.
6. Conduct the experiment.
7. Collect, analyze, and interpret the results.
In conducting an experimental research, first, give a
pre-test to examine the initial condition of both groups in
relation to a variable, condition, or factor; second, apply to
the control group a new condition; and third, give the
latter group a post-test to determine the effects or
influence of the treatment or condition applied on them.
There are many ways of letting a variable, factor, or
condition intervene or have an application on the subjects,
and of later determining the effects of such intervention.
Here are some of these methods: (1) treatment
evaluation; and (2) pre-test and post-test of multiple
treatments or conditions. The first one is also called ex
post facto or after the fact; meaning, evaluation comes
after the treatment. Multiple treatment, on the other hand,
makes you apply on the subjects, not just one, but also
varied treatment methods like using books, interview, or
social networking. You resort to this method when you
Quasi-Experimental Research
Usually, participants chosen in a quasi-experimental
research are those forming a class that remains as one
group incapable of disintegration. The not randomly
chosen participants are subjected to any of these types of
quasi-experimental research (Muijs 2011):
1. matched comparison – choosing a treatment group
and another group that has similarities with the
treatment group
2. time-series quasi-experimental research – giving
them series of pre-tests and post-tests
3. single-subject quasi-experimental research –
controls treatment and condition applied to just one
individual or a group
In which field of knowledge does a true experimental
research usually take place? People in hard sciences
(Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacy, and the like) love
to do this kind of research; those in soft sciences
(Psychology, Sociology, Humanities, Literature, Education,
and other subjects falling under Social Sciences) usually do
quasi-experimental research. (Gray 2012; Laursen et al.
2010)
NON-EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
VARIABLES
Definition
Variables are “changing qualities or characteristics” of persons
or things like age, gender, intelligence, ideas, achievements,
confidence, and so on that are involved in your research study.
Made up of the root or base word “vary” which means to
undergo changes or to differ from, variables have different or
varying values in relation to time and situation. For instance, as
years go by, your age or intelligence increases. But placed in a
situation where you are afflicted with a disease or have no
means of reading or no access to any sources of knowledge,
your intelligence tends to decrease. (Suter 2013, p. 137).
In research, especially in a quantitative research, one
important thing you have to focus on at the start of your study
is to determine the variables involved in your study. Unless you
spend some time pondering on variables in your research, your
work has no chance of attaining its goal. Your research problem
or research topic to which you devote much of your initial
research time finalizing stands great, if it has wordings on the
basic variables involved in your study.
Basic Types
Basically, variables are of two types: independent variables
and dependent variables. Independent variables are those that
cause changes in the subject, while dependent variables are
those that bear or manifest the effects caused by the
independent variables. Hence, in a causal relationship, the
cause comes from the independent variables; the effects, on
Document No. 001-2020
Practical Research 2
Developed by:
Module1: Nature of Issued by:
College for Research & Technology
Inquiry and Research Page 35
CRT
the dependent variables.
In an experimental research, the independent variable as
the condition or treatment applied to the experimental group is
under the control, direction, or manipulation of the researcher
or experimenter. For instance, to determine the positive effects
of one modern grammar theory called SFG (Systemic Functional
Grammar) on IC (Intercultural Competence), you apply this
theory in varied ways like realizing this in a collaborative, oral,
or written activity. In this case, the SFG serves as the
independent variable and the IC as the dependent variable.
Variable Relationships
In a scientific way of studying cause-effect relationships,
these two variables, independent and dependent are part and
parcel of the research because the first one is the cause; the
second, the effect that you can subject to any form of
measurement. However, as you carry out the research, itis
possible that one, two, or more variables or extra variables
crop up to create an impact on the relationship between the
independent and dependent variables. Being extra variables,
they form this other type of variables called extraneous
variables.
For example, in the case of SFG vs. IC, (the first as the
independent variable; the second as the dependent variable)
extraneous variables like age, gender, or personality traits may
suddenly surface to create effects on the relationships of the
two basic variables. Such extraneous variables are called
participant variables if they refer to the moods, emotions, or
intelligence of the subject; situational variables, if they pertain
to nature of the place: smelly, chilly, cold, hot, spacious, and
the like.
Document No. 001-2020
Practical Research 2
Developed by:
Module1: Nature of Issued by:
College for Research & Technology
Inquiry and Research Page 36
CRT
Other Types of Variables
Extraneous variables are to be controlled by you, the
experimenter. But if they do not give in to your control, they
become confounding variables that can strongly influence your
study. Dealing with these types of variables gives you difficulty
in determining the real cause of changes in the dependent
variables; that is, whether it is due only to the independent
variable or to the combination between the confounding and the
independent variables. The involvement of confounding
variables in the research results in the production of “mixed up,
confusing, or bewildering results.” Involved not within the
research situation but outside the research process, the
extraneous variables exist as “nuisance variables,” whose
potency need to go down to prevent it from affecting the results
negatively. (Suter 2013, p. 137; Thomas 2013; Schreiber 2012).
There are other types of variables which are as follows (Russell
2013; Babbie 2013):
Self-check 5.
AE
Self-check 5.