Scribd
Upload
3 views

RUBRICS

Rubrics for grading

Uploaded by

Chin Dho
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views

RUBRICS

Rubrics for grading

Uploaded by

Chin Dho
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

RUBRICS FOR INNOVATIVE DEMO AND PRESENTATION

NAME: ______________________________________
DATE:______________________

COURSE,YR & SEC:__________________________


SCORE:____________________

Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs Improvement (1) SCORE
Content Effectively solves a key tourism Addresses a relevant Partially addresses the Barely addresses the
Relevance problem with innovative and issue but with minor issue but lacks depth issue; content is
relevant features. gaps in innovation or and relevance. irrelevant or poorly
problem-solving. thought out.

Functionality Fully functional, user- Functional with minor Partially functional with Non-functional or poorly
friendly, efficient, and usability or technical significant technical executed.
operates without errors. issues. issues.

Design and Demonstrates the project with Demonstrates clearly but Demonstration lacks Unclear demonstration,
Creativity full clarity, confidence, and with minor issues in confidence or has notable unprofessional, or unable
professionalism; engages the confidence or gaps in clarity to convey functionality.
audience effectively. professionalism
Team Excellent teamwork with clear Good teamwork with slight Limited collaboration; Poor collaboration; most of
Collaboration equal contribution from all imbalances in member uneven distribution of the work is done by one or
members. participation effort among members. two members.
Industry Impact Highly practical and has Practical with some Limited feasibility or Impractical and unrealistic
and Feasibilit clear potential for industry limitations for real-world practicality for real-world for industry use
implementation. implementation application
RUBRIC FOR CRITIQUE PAPER

NAME:_______________________________________ DATE:
____________________________________

_______________________________________ COURSE,YR & SEC


________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs Improvement (1) SCORE
Content and Demonstrates a deep and Shows a clear Displays partial Displays partial
Understanding insightful understanding; fully understanding but misses understanding with understanding with
addresses the key ideas and minor points or context. significant gaps in significant gaps in
context of the work. addressing key ideas or addressing key ideas or
context. context.
Critical Analysis Excellent and well-supported Good analysis with minor Limited analysis; focuses Weak or absent analysis
analysis; effectively evaluates lapses in support or on superficial aspects with little to no reasoning
strengths, weaknesses, and reasoning. without in-depth or evidence.
relevance.
evaluation.

Writing Quality Error-free, clear, and Few minor errors in Multiple errors that slightly Multiple errors that slightly
professional writing with grammar, spelling, or affect readability or affect readability or
advanced vocabulary. clarity; good use of demonstrate limited demonstrate limited
vocabulary.
Originality and Demonstrates exceptional Shows some originality and Limited originality; ideas Lacks originality or
Insight originality and fresh insight but relies on are mostly repetitive or meaningful insight; ideas
perspectives; offers meaningful conventional perspectives. unoriginal. are shallow or copied.
insights beyond the obvious.
Lacks originality Perfectly follows formatting Minor formatting or citation Multiple errors in Poor formatting or lack of
or meaningful guidelines; all references are errors. formatting or citations but citations; does not follow
insight; ideas are properly cited. does not significantly affect guidelines.
shallow or the critique’s credibility.
copied.

You might also like