How Portfolios and Conferences Transformed My AP

Science Classroom
growbeyondgrades.org/blog/science-portfolios-and-conferencing

November 18, 2022

Blog
Nov 18
Written By Dave Eddy

I teach in an AP science classroom in a school whose teachers operate as a part of a

professional learning community. Of course, working in a professional learning community
means having regular meetings with curricular teams to discuss curriculum and instructional
practices rooted in data-informed decision-making. From my experience of working within
curricular teams, AP courses are slower to change fundamental practices—like those
associated with grading and reporting—than non-AP courses. There is an expectation of
content coverage to prepare students to take the AP exam by the end of the year, and,
because of this focus, AP teachers are reluctant to try something different. Why change if it
is not broken, right?

But it IS broken. Our measurement of success was AP exam test scores, and by that
measure, we were very successful on average. However, when we dug deeper, we noticed
some students struggled. On other measures of success, including student sense of
belonging, valuing the subject matter, satisfaction with the course, and connection with the
instructor, we were not scoring so well from the student's perspective. The answer for
improving the student experience was grounded in creating a more individualized
experience by focusing on feedback instead of grades.

Although I found the standards-based grading system far superior to the traditional grading
system, students were still focused on scores, not on learning.

Tweet this

Three years ago, our school completed a transition to standards-based grading. While it
was a good solution for issues such as separating behavior and academic achievement and
talking removing the significant impact of zeros, it still replaced a traditional grade with a standards-
about his
experience based one. Teachers were still falling back on old practices, and students were still asking,
with
traditional/ “How do I make this 2.0 into a 3.0” instead of “How do I make this C into a B.” Students
standard
based weren’t collecting points anymore, but they were still collecting 3’s, and, once they received
grading
system. it's what they wanted, they would stop trying and focus their efforts on another class. Although I
too
focused on found the standards-based grading system far superior to the traditional grading system,
grades and students were still focused on scores, not on learning.
not
"learning"

1/4
To shift the focus toward learning, I implemented portfolios in the classroom to collect
evidence of student learning. In addition, I required students to have regular formal and
informal conferences with me. These two additions profoundly impacted student learning,
where students discussed their understanding based on feedback, not the grades. Student
language shifted from accumulating points toward articulating what they understood.

Portfolios

Using learning portfolios creates a structure for students to demonstrate their level of
understanding as individual learners with individual needs. My students began building their
portfolios after every content unit we concluded, approximately every two or three weeks.
They gathered evidence that supported their mastery of each of the three targets in the
course. My curricular team decided that every student who completed a physics course
should be able to communicate their understanding verbally, graphically, and
mathematically. These science skills aligned well with the NGSS Science and Engineering
Practices 4, 5, and 6, so we made those our targets on which students could focus.

Creating portfolios is where the power of going gradeless comes in. If providing scores
perpetuated the poor student mindset and habits associated with traditional grading
systems, then maybe the answer is to do away with grading. Throughout the semester, I
provided written and verbal feedback to students regarding what was strong in their
evidence and what they could do to improve it. Some students had much room for
improvement, while others demonstrated a complete understanding with their initial
submission. Regardless, I provided each student with comments on what they had done
well, and extension questions they could answer to enhance their understanding. Both
struggling and exceptional students had a pathway to improve. When it came time for
students to gather their evidence to submit for their portfolio, everyone had their best work
available.

Students were given the autonomy of determining what evidence from their in-class
experiences showed their best level of understanding of science and engineering practices.
I insisted that the common end-of-unit assessment included in each student’s portfolio, so I
had a consistent measure between students. The students gathered all additional evidence
based on their experiences throughout the unit. Many students chose labs, which were
common in-class activities, and every student completed them in person. Honestly, I had
expected most students to select evidence based on the labs we did in class, but they could
choose the labs that best demonstrated their mastery, and that is where student agency
over their assessment came in.

Some students chose less prescribed evidence, like a formal essay. This choice floored me
the first time that I scored one. I had a student who was passionate about writing and had
taken several elective writing classes in high school. I didn't know it then, but the product I
received was better than I had ever expected. This student was not particularly strong with

2/4
mathematics, and much of my critical feedback involved the mathematical understanding of
the material. Upon submitting an essay explaining the material, it was clear this student had
understood the course's core concepts, and it was one of the better pieces of evidence I
had seen that semester. Had students not had the opportunity to choose the ways of
demonstrating their understanding, I would not have had as clear of a picture of what they
knew.

Student-constructed portfolios have now replaced a summative final exam after each
semester. As an educator still required to provide the school with a single semester grade
that reflected what students had learned in the course, I now had an exhaustive set of
student-curated evidence that informed the grade. Although I could have gone through
these portfolios on my own and determined an end-of-the-semester grade, the power of
using portfolios is fully realized when combined with a student-led conference.

When students learn to self-assess accurately, it enables them to transfer skills and
understanding well beyond the classroom.

Tweet this

Conferences

At the midterm and end of each semester, students schedule a meeting with me during
class that lasts 5 minutes. I don’t have pre-set questions in mind; I let them do the talking.
The goal is a self-assessment based on the work they submitted in their portfolio. I have
students create a digital portfolio so there is a “backup” in case paper copies get lost or
ruined, but work curated in a binder is just as good as digital for a conference. Students
state their case of what they learned about each standard in the class and present evidence
to justify their claim.

Because we practice self-assessment throughout the year, most students know what they
have learned. However, despite the practice, students are often hypercritical of themselves
and assign a grade less than I would give. I always let them know when they are inflating or
deflating their evidence, and we work together to reach a consensus.

The midterm and the end of the semester are the only times students receive a grade in my
class. Students communicate this grade home through email (cc’ing me) so we can
continue the conversation with caregivers. Because students have significant involvement, I
rarely have parents question the final grade. Instead, students articulate what they have
learned and why the grade reflects their learning.

Conferencing has allowed me to outsource responsibility of determining and assigning

grades to student work. This statement seems selfish, but it is far from it. Putting agency
over one’s grades into the hands of learners allows them to exercise metacognitive skills.

3/4
 When students learn to self-assess accurately, it enables them to transfer skills and
understanding well beyond the classroom.

to summarize allat, he used portfolios and also conferences to grade

them
portfolio:
- do classwork
- make them compile their labs and classwork in a way that's
comfortable to them+ show what they learned
- seems to increase their motivation to learn
conference
- gives students a say in their final grade
- gives students self assessment skills
- tr can easily catch on if the student is lying about their effort

4/4