1.02 - Ages and Stages in First Language Development
1.02 - Ages and Stages in First Language Development
status Done
Pre-linguistic behaviours
Pre-lexical behaviours
Emerging grammar
‘Ages and stages’ as presented here is kind of an amalgam of different authors’ work
Prelinguistic Behaviours
Cooing ( ~ 0-3 months) — neonatal infants typically don’t have much control of their
bodies
They don’t have much control and so they don’t choose to do to make those noises
When kid exercise the noise making parts of their system and randomly start
making lengthy noises
Kid plays with combinations of vocal tract controls, airflow, larynx position, soft palate
position, etc.; begin to develop ‘awareness’ of how to make different sounds and how
these match the speech around them.
There are overlapping between the stages so it varies for each child as there is no ‘typical’
child.
Prelexical Behaviours
Babbling ( ~ 6-12 months) — voluntary, and apparently practiced and structured sounds,
but not necessarily communicative
[ ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ]
Words they say can be just noises and have no meaning behind it based on context
Some authors use ‘canonical’ to refer to the earlier, more reduplicated, stage with advanced
non-reduplicated (variegated) babble folded into an early-words stage
First words are typically (for English learners) one and two syllable babbles which take
on referential meaning.
First words tend to be limited to a smaller consonant and vowel inventory than the child
can produce (that is, the building blocks are a subset of the available possibilities)
First words represent a huge cognitive leap — things have names, and I can use names
to communicate (draw attention to, get information about, demand…)
Kids have developed intonational ‘tunes’ or ‘melodies’ that are (or mimic) common
intonational meanings, such as declarative, question, command, demand, etc.
Many kids seem to show ‘pragmatic’ understanding and usage much earlier, including
showing conversational turn-taking behaviour
These ‘tunes’ have an extra layer of communicative signalling that help them get their
message through
‘Communicate with a single word something that might take an adult a whole sentence to
say’
Words not only name things, but have more complicated meanings/intentions (expressing
desire, denial, question, etc.)
‘Around’ 18 months, kids typically have around 50 (or let’s just ‘several dozen’) distinct,
stable words (i.e., words they can use and understand)
‘Around’ or after 18 months (they say), kids begin a vocabulary spurt; it took a year for kids
to get to around 50 words, they might double that in the next year or two.
Stereotypically, we think of the early lexicon as being very contentful (nouns, adjectives,
verbs)
The vocabulary spurt is often accompanied by intense curiosity about things, and learning
their names attributes
These kids seem to be concerned with learning the names of everything around them,
and more broadly how things around them are organized
A ‘namey’ kid might be very interested in names of animals, and kinds of animals
(mammals, reptiles, birds), and relationships among animals (bears, cubs; rams, ewes,
lambs)
They may be learning words to label and organize things in the world
They can organize through different things like colour, texture, etc.
Hellen Keller using word forms to understand a concept, like how she learned the word
water while having her hands under the water pump
Their early words may include more interactive forms (e.g., ‘see?’ ‘up’)
These kids may be less interested in organizing the world and more in just having
interactions
Their goal isn’t to organize the word, but is it get more input and examples of what their
language looks like
Eventually, true two-word utterances emerge; words have a meaning with respect to each
toher and have rules for combination (i.e., syntax)
Adjective-noun combinations are problematic, since English allows ‘(it’s a ) big dog’ and
‘(the) dog (is) big’
Telegraphic Stage
As kids begin to produce longer utterances, they’re still mostly limited to content words
This is called ‘telegraphic’ because old telegrams used to be charged by the word; the result
was a ‘broken’ style characteristic of telegrams (watch some old westerns for example)
“Old uncle Griff passed away on Sunday, and left you about $200 and his collection of
Hummel figures”
They keep it short and drop out words that aren’t critical like determinants
In heavy inflectional languages (e.g., Italian), words (even at earlier stages) may look
inflected (i.e., verbs, etc.) may have tense/agreement morphology
Longish words, but it’s not clear that they are meaningful
For kids at this stage, these are not ‘analyzable’ words with meaningful parts— most
words will have a typical or ‘neutral’ form (e.g., singular for nouns, third singular for
verbs) that the kid doesn’t treat (or recognize) as morphologically complex)
Sentenital negatives (not, -n’t) appear; weak prepositions, articles (determiners) appear
Simple variations on SVO word order (e.g., yes/no questions/subject/AUX inversion, wh-
fronting, etc.) appear
Some kids are able to produce passives (but some evidence suggests that passive processing
doesn’t fully develop until mid-primary school age
Can produce passives not in the same way adults do, under 3 and 4 years old
Phrases conjunctions, things that combines more than one clauses are beginning to form
at around 4-6 years of age
Not clear if this involves later grammatical development or later cognitive development
Is Language-Learning Innate?
Biologists describe some behaviours as “instinctive”
Instinctive behaviour are automatic; they don’t need to be taught, so much as they
emerge on some kind of biological schedule
Innate — Instinctive behaviours that emerges on it’s own in some biological schedule; they
are part of our genetic evolutionary shaping
It may emerge at birth or later but it will emerge on its own in our development
Around reduplicated words stage and first words stage, things fall out but they still
practice making noises even without being able to hear anything