DPNote4_FileNamingAndFormats
DPNote4_FileNamingAndFormats
Why are file naming and file formats important for digital preservation?
Smart file naming and considered choice of file formats will make a significant difference to the long-term
preservation of digital records. Consistently using a standard file name format that follows some basic
rules will help ensure files can be found, opened, and preserved for as long as necessary. Choosing file
formats that are robust and well-supported will aid the management and maintenance of growing
numbers of digital records. Addressing these two issues early in the creation of records is an important
step towards successfully preserving digital content.
This Digital Preservation Topical Note was produced with the kind support of the National Archives of Ireland
What are the risks involved with file
formats?
File formats are like containers for digital
content. Like a VHS or a cassette tape, an .mp4
and .wmv hold video and the information
needed to play that video. Three main risks
associated with file formats are obsolescence,
proliferation, and dwindling commercial or
community support. While all three issues can
be addressed through preservation strategies, it
is important to be aware of the them when
creating new records.
File Format Obsolescence - when newer generations of software phase out support for older formats. For
example, documents created using WordStar (word processing software from the 1980s) cannot be easily
opened using modern software programmes.
Proliferation - the rapid creation of new file format types to support new or improved forms of digital
content. An organisation can accumulate many different file formats, and versions of those formats, e.g.
text documents in different versions of PDF, Word, and Rich Text formats. Tracking and managing all
these formats (which ones are at risk, and which software tools can be used for each one) can be a
serious challenge.
Lack of Support - if a commercial provider of a proprietary file format discontinues backwards
compatibility, older records will become more challenging to access and preserve. Similarly, if a
community responsible for an open source file format detects a decrease in use, they may stop
supporting it.
The risks posed to file formats are not as severe as originally feared 10 to 20 years ago, but it is important
to be aware of the potential dangers to the long-term lifespan of a record when creating it. Creating
records in file formats that are more likely to stand the test of time improve the chances of that record
lasting into the future. Most organisations will have guidance on preferred formats to use when creating
records that will be preserved, or advice can be sought from archives or records management colleagues.
However, the aim of preservation is not to restrict the creation of meaningful, useful records. The best
way forward is to find a balance between using new and innovative file formats and choosing
preservation strategies to best maintain those records.
For more information on Digital Preservation visit the DPC Website: https://www.dpconline.org