High School Science_ Informational Writing
High School Science_ Informational Writing
Objective Statement
Standards
Performance Indicators
Learning Progression
Instructional Resources
Objective Name
Objective Statement
All students will demonstrate competency in obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information in
writing informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information
clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of scientific content within
the context of grade level science standards.
Standard(s) for the Grade Standard(s) for Standard(s) for the Grade
Level(s) Before Current Grade Level Level(s) After
Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information in 9–12 builds on K–8 experiences and progresses to
evaluating the validity and reliability of the claims, methods, and designs.
● Critically read scientific literature adapted for classroom use to determine the central ideas or
conclusions and/or to obtain scientific and/or technical information to summarize complex evidence,
concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still
accurate terms.
● Compare, integrate and evaluate sources of information presented in different media or formats (e.g.,
visually, quantitatively) as well as in words in order to address a scientific question or solve a
problem.
● Gather, read, and evaluate scientific and/or technical information from multiple authoritative sources,
assessing the evidence and usefulness of each source.
● Evaluate the validity and reliability of and/or synthesize multiple claims, methods, and/or designs that
appear in scientific and technical texts or media reports, verifying the data when possible.
Communicate scientific and/or technical information or ideas (e.g. about phenomena and/or the
process of development and the design and performance of a proposed process or system) in
multiple formats (i.e., orally, graphically, textually, mathematically).
Performance Indicators for Met Expectations
1. Students clearly introduce a researchable topic in a manner that is compelling and follows logically
from the task and purpose, and determine central ideas to demonstrate a precise and nuanced
analysis of the content.
2. Students can present accurate, sufficient evidence from an experiment, scientific media, the natural
world, or a design solution that supports their claim or argument. Students consistently use relevant
evidence from multiple sources, and provide an interpretation that completely connects evidence with
a model or theory.
3. Students exhibit clear organization with use of appropriate and varied transitions to create a unified
whole and enhance meaning. Students establish and maintain formal style using precise, stylistically
sophisticated, grade-appropriate language and domain-specific vocabulary with a strong sense of
voice.
4. Students demonstrate grade-appropriate command of conventions.
Performance Indicator #1: Students clearly introduce a researchable topic in a manner that is
compelling and follows logically from the task and purpose, and determine central ideas to
demonstrate a precise and nuanced analysis of the content.
Met Expectations/
Exceeded Approached Partially Met
Performance
Expectations Expectations Expectations
Indicator
Students clearly Students clearly Students clearly Students introduce a
introduce a introduce a introduce a researchable topic and
researchable topic in a researchable topic in a researchable topic that central ideas that
manner that is manner that is completely addresses demonstrate valid
compelling and compelling and follows the task and purpose. understanding of the
comprehensive. logically from the task content.
and purpose. Students determine
Students determine central ideas that
Did
central ideas to Students determine demonstrate precise
Not
demonstrate a precise central ideas to grade-appropriate
Yet
and nuanced analysis demonstrate a precise analysis of content.
Meet
of the content. and nuanced analysis
of the content.
Performance Indicator #2: Students can present accurate, sufficient evidence from an
experiment, scientific media, the natural world, or a design solution that supports their claim or
argument. Students consistently use relevant evidence from multiple sources, and provide an
interpretation that completely connects evidence with a model or theory.
Met Expectations/
Exceeded Approached Partially Met
Performance
Expectations Expectations Expectations
Indicator
Performance Indicator #3: Students exhibit clear organization with use of appropriate and varied
transitions to create a unified whole and enhance meaning. Students establish and maintain formal
style using precise, stylistically sophisticated, grade-appropriate language and domain-specific
vocabulary with a strong sense of voice.
Met Expectations/
Exceeded Approached Partially Met
Performance
Expectations Expectations Expectations
Indicator
Students Students exhibit clear Students exhibit clear Students exhibit some
demonstrate effective organization with use organization, with the attempt at
and intentional of appropriate and use of appropriate organization, with
deviation from varied transitions to transitions to create a inconsistent use of
traditional structure create unified whole unified whole. transitions.
that results in and enhance
strengthening the meaning. Students establish and Students establish but
argument and the maintain a formal style not fully maintain a
sequence of Students establish using stylistically formal style, with
paragraphs and maintain formal sophisticated, inconsistent use of
intentionally style using precise, grade-appropriate grade-appropriate
advances the stylistically language and language and
argument. sophisticated, domain-specific domain-specific
grade-appropriate vocabulary. vocabulary.
Students establish language and
and maintain a formal domain-specific Students provide a Students provide a
style, using vocabulary with a concluding statement concluding statement
grade-appropriate, strong sense of voice. or section that follows or section that follows
stylistically from the claim and generally from the
sophisticated Students create an assertions presented. claim and assertions
language (including introduction that presented.
rhetorical and provides sufficient
structural devices) background about the
and domain-specific claim or argument.
vocabulary with a
notable sense of Students create a
voice. conclusion that
follows from the claim
Students create an and assertions
introduction that presented and
draws the reader in presents next steps.
and an insightful
conclusion provides a
satisfying sense of
resolution or closure.
Met Expectations/
Exceeded Approached Partially Met
Performance
Expectations Expectations Expectations
Indicator
Performance on previous year’s course finals in ELA and Science (data can be found in Illuminate if the
student took a district course final)
Body of evidence items can be collected from numerous pre-built and teacher-developed
assessment items aligned with content standards and District Competencies.
Body of Evidence
Linked below are instructional resources that might support educators in collecting, scoring, and/or analyzing
tasks/assessments for this SLO (scoring rubrics, exemplars, sample tasks, data sources, etc.).
Need support with the SLO process? Contact [email protected] or review the SLO Handbook.