010021410
010021410
1.Introduction
Coconut is one of the most important perennial crops for the economy of
intertropical countries (Persley, 1992). Thanks to breeding, high-performance
hybrids can be achieved. However, conventional selection methods have some
constraints derived from the features of the reproduction of these perennial plants:
great variability among progeny (consequence of the allogamy), very long
selection cycle, low multiplication rate (coconut is only multiplied from seeds),
and absence of natural vegetative propagation.
I
Fonds Dscumenhir~ B R D
few plantlets were regenerated through unreliable protocols (Blake, 1990; Verdeil
and Buffard-Morel, 1995). Until 1995 plantlet regeneration was considered as “the
great challenge” and this led to competition and lack of collaboration between the
different teams, resulting in a very poor exchange of scientific information. During
the last four years (1995-1998), a ‘collaborative effort directed towards the
improvement of coconut micropropagation through somatic embryogenesis,
I
started within an EC STD3-project by five teams: three European laboratories
(Wye College in the UK, the University of Hannover in Germany and ORSTOM-
CIR4D in France), and two laboratories from producing countries (Philippines
Coconut Authority - PCA in Philippines; and Centro de Investigación Científica
de Yucatán - CICY in México). The present paper reports highlights of the results
1
obtained in this project,
The different phases of the in vitro protocols have been improved by the different
participants of the project and plantlets are now regularly obtained in most
laboratories of the consortium.
2.I. On solid media containing charcoal (Partners involved: PCA, CICY, Wye,
ORsToM/CIIRA0)
It has been demonstrated for a long time that tissues collected fiom adult coconut
palms can be maintained on a medium containing charcoal, (the latter controlling
browning, which is one of the major constraints of coconut tissue culture), to
allow calli production in the presence of auxin growth regulators such as 2,4-
dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (Blake and Eeuwens, 1980). As the culture of
392
t
!
coconut tissues has in the past been practised in a number of laboratoriks there has
been a lot of discussion about choice of media and related matters. One of most
important objectives has been to compare and to improve the different protocols
for callogenesis and embryogenesis using different explant sources (immature
inflorescences, immature leaves and plumular tissues removed from zygotic
embryos).
Embryogenic calli and complete embryos able to germinate were obtained in all
the laboratories involved in the project, working with media containing 2,4-D and
activated charcoal, and starting with different sources of explants. In Wye College
from immature inflorescences and plumular tissues; in CICY from plumular
tissues (Chan et al., 1998; Sáenz et al., this volume); in PCA from immature
leaves, plumular tissues and immature inflorescences; and in ORSTOM-CIRAD
from immature leaves, plumular tissues and immature inflorescences.
reflect the quality and the volume of the information exchanged between the
partners, who have succeeded in strengthening their links within the framework of
i
this consortium.
The trials carried out by the different partners allow the identification and
confirmation of some key factors for coconut regeneration through somatic
embryogenesis:
393
a. The optimum 2,4-D level for the formation of embryogenic calli depends on
the genotype.
b. A study conduced by PCA on the response of different cultivars to their callus
initiation media showed that there are significant differences among cultivars
in terms of percentage of calloid formation and that the optimum 2,4-D
$
concentration required for this varies depending on the genotype used. It is
interesting to note that the use of different levels of auxin allowed the
..
formation of calloids on all the genotypes tested in different laboratories (Wye
College, PCA and ORSTOM-CIRAD).
c. Regeneration of complete somatic embryos require a decrease in the 2,4-D
level and the introduction of a cytokinin in the medium. TDZ or 2iP were
found to be two of the most efficient cytokinins
d. Germination of the somatic embryos (obtained fiom all the experimented
explant sources) is initiated on a medium containing BAP.
e. GA3 promotes somatic embryo germination in the presence of BAP. This
promising result obtained by CICY with plumular tissue, need to be repeated.
3 94
1 I
used a Murashige and Skoog basal medium with sucrose (50 g I-'), containing
TDZ in combination with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, 2.5 g 1-') (a compound that
adsorbs polyphenols involved in tissue browning). The medium was solidified
with gelrite (3 g 1-') and tissues were subcultured every 2 weeks.
They observed a high rate of callus formation (75% with inflorescence F-7 and
TDZ 3 x M) after only three weeks of culture (Köhne and Jacobsen, this
.-
volume). Further development of the cultures led to shoot-like structures. These
structures were transferred onto media for the induction of shoot elongation and
rooting (Köhne and Jacobsen, this volume). Unfortunately, most of the cultures
were lost because of contamination by a bacterium (presumed to be an
endogenous bacterium) or by fimgus.
In contrast, experiments carried out in Mérida, Albay, Wye and Montpellier with
immature inflorescences according to the Hannover charcoal-free protocol led to
callus formation but with a very low percentage (less than 5%, 4-6 months after
the start of culture). Intense tissue browning and slow calli growth was noted.
During the subsequent transfer of the calli to fresh medium, they turned brown
and died.
Some of the calli obtained in Hannover were sent to Montpellier for histological
analysis. It turned out that most of them were expanded flower buds that did not
show features generally observed in embryogenic calli. However, three of the
callus samples (out of 19 analysed) showed organogenic potential (see below
4.1.).Unfortunately, in terms of avoiding the use of charcoal, these trials were not
successful. It seems that we will have to continue depending on the use of this
additive, at least for the culture of inflorescence explants.
395
Table 1. Quantification of free 2,4-D level in the presence of different charcoal brand.
Free 2,4-D level** (mg rl)in the presence of 2 g 1" of activated charcoal
frnm.
Medium age RPQM (México) Acidic washed (Sigma) Neutralised (Sigma)
396
buffer the * free 2,4-D concentration. This buffering effect apparently
. contributes to callogenesis. 2,4-D can also be released from charcoal during
tissue growth and/or tissue browning (Table 3).
Table 2. Concentrations of free growth regulators as a result of the interaction between added BAP
and/or 2,4-D with charcoal (2 g 1-I).
Medium 2,4-D and BAP (mg I-’) .
0.45 f 0.07
O
2,4-D
BAP
100 I 2,4D
100
1.05 f 0.28
BAP
150
Calli without brown area o. 12f 0.02 0.10 f 0.01 0.15 f 0.03
Calli with brown areas 0.11f 0.03 0.24 f 0.07 0.56 f 0.12
From a practical point of view, the techniques developed to quan?ify plant growth
regulators within media containing charcoal have allowed a better understanding
o f why its use was a constant source of potential difficulties. This led to a better
control of coconut tissue culture on media containing this additive, increasing
experiment reliability. This was also of major importance for the standardisation
of media used by the different partners.
Advances have been made in studies of the roles of charcoal and the function it
fulfils in tissue culture. The discovery that it is operating as an “auxin slow-release
agent” is both completely novel and important in our understanding of the
397
: ” n
398
very useful to manipulate their culture. Therefore, it was decided to use zygotic
embryo as a model for the characterisation of hormonal stat& during embryo
development.
These studies support the idea that cytokinins play an important role in coconut
embryogenesis of both zygotic and somatic types. This information will eventually
enable us to fme tune the protocols to optimise coconut regeneration.
Because morphogenetic events occur slowly during coconut tissue in vitro culture
(it takes around 2 years from the frrst culturing operation to the appearance of
plantlets), the search for early markers of embryogenesis is particularly important
in order to obtain successful regeneration and thus to avoid keeping non-
responsive tissues in culture.
399
n
Single embryogenic cell individualisation could also be identified but this route
led to abortion after the first few embryogenic cell divisions. This type of
embryogenic pathway could be interesting for obtaining embryogenic suspensions.
The objective of this study was to test for the presence of specific markers of early
somatic embryogenesis in coconut tissues. These markers were available in
Hannover and were identified as being species independent. The study started in
Hannover in 1997 with the tissues obtained in Hannover but also with material
sent by PCA, CICY and ORSTOM-CIRAD, covering a wide range of
development stages (from the starting explant to germinated embryos. Three
different antibodies were used: 7C5 directed against a protein marker for early
embryogenesis (Altherr et al., 1993), TIM 11 B2 recognising a 40 D a
glycoprotein (marker of cell elongation) (Reinard et al., 1994) and -Glo-I
recognising Glyoxalase I (an enzyme involved in the control of cell-proliferation
and cell-differentiation processes) (Thornally, 1990). Results showed that
following screening with the 7C5 antibody (marker of early embryogenesis) a
strong signal was present in some of the embryogenic structures sent to Hannover.
(for more details see Köhne and Jacobsen, this volume).
400
I
In all the samples screened with the -Glo-I antibody (marker for cell proliferation)
a signal was always detected independent of the source and the treatment; I
however this signal was always weak. This could be related to the very low
mitotic index that is generally observed in coconut, and characteristic of the very
slow growing in vitro cultures of this species.
Among the markers available in Hannover no candidates could be selected for the
early identification of coconut tissues showing competence for somatic
embryogenesis.
Further studies are required to find useful markers that will help us to select
embryogenic tissues and monitor their response to growth regulator treatments.
results obtained by CICY on phosphorylated proteins have already opened up
promising lines of research.
40 1
Work to investigate the physiological status of shoots obtained in vitro was
conducted using in vitro germinated zygotic embryos as a model system. Net
photosynthesïs rate was estimated through COZ exchange measurements on intact
leaves (Triques et a1.,1997a) Chlorophyll fluorimeby, a non destructive and highly
sensitive method, was used to analyse the potential activity (OpMAx)and the actual
efficiency (0p) of photosystem II. To characterise carbon metabolism,
!
carboxylase (Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, PEPC; and Ribulose 1,5-
biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, RubisCO) activities were measured in crude
extracts and the PEPC:RubisCO ratio was used as an indicator of autotrophic CO2
fixation. Quantification of the RubisCO protein was performed using
immunoelectrophoresis. The development of the photosynthetic apparatus was
assessed by TEM observation of leaf chloroplast ultrastructure, (Triques et
al.,1997b)
In studies carried out at CICY, coconut vitroplants (derived from zygotic embryos)
showed a reduced capacity to control water loss relative to that shown by field-
grown plants. This is due to altered stomatal functioning. Ventilation of the
culture containers resulted in an increased capacity of vitroplants to control water
loss, similar to that shown by field-grown plants.
402
These results are promising as a means of in vitro hardening and acclimatisation
’ that is today the major bottleneck for the establishment of clone field trials or
demonstrative plots. Knowledge of vitrbplant physiology has to be increased to
help us to improve in vitro shoot growing conditions and will facilitate plantlet
transfer to ex vitro culture conditions.
6. Conclusion
Solid progress for the mastery of coconut regeneration has been made in the last
three years under this project. The partners have exchanged information (through a
publication: Coconut Newsletter) and techniques (through trainings and
publication of a compendium of the protocols) thus enabling us to improve
our respective protocols. Since coconut regeneration is a slow phenomenon (the
actual process from inflorescence explants takes at least three years), it would be
too early at this stage to accurately quanti@ the impact of this project on the
improvement of each regeneration phase. Nevertheless, in a tentative assessment,
taking into account the data available so far using the ORSTOMKIRAD protocol,
the efficiencies of embryogenesis induction and embryo maturation have been at
least doubled. Although, there is still room to improve, prototype regeneration
systems from plumular tissues and fiom immature inflorescence are now available,
and clonal plantlets are produced now in the project participating laboratories.
403
References
1. Altherr S, Stirn S and Jacobsen HJ (1993). Immunobiochemical analysis of a nuclear protein marker
for regeneration potential in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 141:415-422.
2. Blake J and Eeuwens CJ (1980). Inflorescence tissue as source material for vegetative propagation of
coconut palm. In: Proc. 1ntem.Conf. Cocoa/Coconuts, Kuala Lumpur, pp 549-556. Incorporated
Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur.
?3, Blake J (1990). Coconut (Cocos nucifra L.) Micropropagation. In: YPS Bajaj (Ed.). Biotechnology
I
in Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 10, Legumes and Oil Seed Crops, pp 538-554. Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg. 1
4. BuEard-More! J, Verdeil JL and Pannetier C (1992). Embryogenkse somatique du cocotier (Cocos
nucifra L.) A partir de tissus foliaires: étude histologique. Can J Bot 70:735-741.
5. Chan JL, Saénz L, Talavera C, Homung R, Robert M and Oropeza C (1998). Regeneration of I
coconut (Cocos nucifra L.) from plumule explants through somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell
Reports 17:515-521. I
6. Desjardins Y (1995). Factors affecting CO2 fixation in striving to optimize photoautotrophy in !
micropropagated plantlets. Plant Tiss Cult Biotech 1:13-25.
7. Ebert A and Taylor HF (1990). Assessment of the changes of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid I
concentrationsin plant tissue culture media in the presence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell Tiss Org
Cult 20:165-172.
8. Ebert A, Taylor FH and Blake J (1993). Changes of 6-benzylaminopurine and 2,4-
dichlorophenoxyaceticacid concentrations in plant tissue culture media in the presence of activated
charcoal. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 33:157-162.
9. Fisher DB (1968). Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemie
16:92-96.
10. Hornung R (1995). Initiation in callogenesis in coconut palm (Cocos nucfera L). In: C Oropeza, FW
Howard, GR Ashburner (Eds.) Lethal yellowing research and practical aspects, pp 203-215. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
11. Islas-Flores I, Oropeza C and Hernández-Sotomayor SMT (1998). Protein phosphorylation during
coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) zygotic embryo development. Plant Physiol 118 :257-263.
12. Magnaval C (1995). Etude des facteurs nutritifs intervenant lors de l'initiation de 'embryogenèse
somatique du cocotier (Cocos nucifra L.) en milieu gélosé et mise au point des suspensions
embryogènes.PhD thesis, Université Paris Vi. Paris.
13. Persley G (1992). Replanting the Tree of Life. Towards an international agenda for coconut palm
research. CAB Intemational, Wallingford, UK.
14. Reinard T, Sprunck S, Altherr S and Jacobsen HJ (1994). Biochemical properties of a novel cell wall
protein associated with elongation growth in higher plants. JExp Bot 45:1593-1601.
15. Ri110 EP, Cueto CA, Orense OD, A r e a MBB. and Ebert AW (1992). Recent development on embryo
culturetechnology of coconuts. Phil JCrop Science 17 (Suppl. N01):S30.
16. Thornally PJ (1990). The glyoxalase system: new developements towards functional characterisation
of metabolic pathway fundamental to biological life. Biochem J 269:l-11.
17. Triques K (1996). Comportement des embryons zygotiques de cocotier (Cocos nucifra L.) cultivés in
vifro: Nutrition et acquisition de l'autotrophie. DEA, Bases de la production végétale, Université
Montpellier II, 13p.
18. Triques K, Rival A, Bedé T, Dussert S, Hocher V, Verdeil JL and Hamon S (1997a) Developmental
changes in carboxylase activities in in vitro cultured coconut zygotic embryos: comparison with
correspondingactivities in seedlings. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 49:227-231.
19. Triques K, Rival A, Beult T, Puard M, Roy J, Nato A, Lavergne D, Havaux M, Verdeil JL, Sangare
A and Hamon S (1997b). Photosynthetic ability of in vifro grown coconut (Cocus nucifra L.)
plantlets derived from zygotic embryos. Plant Sci127:39-51.
404
I
20. Triques K, Rival A, Bedé T, Morcillo F, Hocher V, Verdeil JL and Hamon S (1998). Changes in
photosynthetic parameters during in vifro growth and subsequent acclimatization of coconut (Cocos
nuciferu L.) zygotic embryos. Acta Hort 461: 275-282.
21. Verdeil JL and Buffard-Morel J (1995). Somatic embryogenesis in coconut (Cocos nuciferu L.). In!
YPS Bajaj (Ed.). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 30. Somatic embryogenesis and
Synthetic Seed, I, pp 299-3 17. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
22. Verdeil JL, Buffard-Morel J, Dussert S, Rival A, Grosdemange F, Huet C and Pannetier C (1993).
Coconut clones through somatic embryogenesis. In: MK Nair, HH Khan, P Gopalasundaram and
E W Bhaskara Ra0 (Eds.). Advances in Coconut Research and Development, pp 173-179. Oxford &
IBH, New Delhi.
23. Verdeil JL, Huet C, Grosdemange F and BuEard-Morel J (1994). Plant regeneration from cultured
immature inflorescences of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Plant
Cell Rep 13:218-221.
24. Verdeil JL (1993). Etude de la régénération du cocotier (Cocos nucifra L.) par embryogenèse
somatique à partir d'explants intlorescentiels. PhD thesis, l'université P. et M. Curie (Paris VI),
156p.
405
Current Advancesin Coconut
Biotechnology
Edited by
C. OROPEZA !I-
Centro de Investigación Cientpca de Kicatríiz (Méricìci)
J.L. VERDEIL
ORSTOM-CIRAD (Montpellicr)
G.R. ASHBURNER
II1st it 1it e of Siistoi11able Irrigated Ag rici1It i 1re (Tat11 ieri)
and
J.M. SANTAMARÍA
C nI /)'ode I ì IIv s t ig cici61i CieiI t $ca de K r cntrii I (Mérida)
if: ;
. .
. . . . . .. , .
' . .. . . .. . . .. . '
. .. .. :
. . .:; .: . .
. .
. . . . . . ._
, . . . . .. .
ISBN 0-7923-5823-6
I
..
....'
:!';
B
l-4' b
, ..' .
VOLUME 35 ., __... '
._ . .
Scientijc Edifor
R.J. Summerfield, The University of Renditig, Department ofAgricirlture, P.O.Box 236, Rending RG6
2A1; Berkshire, UK
The titles priblidied in this series n-re listed ot the end of this voliittie.
... . .