RP_PR-2-1
RP_PR-2-1
August 2024
ii
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction
Objectives 3
Review of Literature 5
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework 9
Definition of Terms 10
Chapter 3 Methodology
Research Design 11
Research Locale 11
Research Instruments 13
Data analysis 14
References 15
1
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Noise pollution, caused by rising sound pressure levels, has become a growing
concern in many urban and industrial areas. Trends show that increasing urbanization,
population growth, and industrial activities have intensified noise levels, adversely affecting
public health and environment quality. Moreover, studies reveal that prolonged exposure to
high noise levels can lead to hearing loss, stress, and cardiovascular issues, highlighting its
pervasive impact. This study aims to assess and map noise levels to better understand the
spatial distribution of noise pollution and provide data- driven solutions for effective noise
management.
This study investigates the exposure to high SPL can significantly give negative
impact on human health. In addition to these findings, it also points to the potential for
change. Studies have found that excessive noise in various environments, such as student
housing, industrial workplaces, and sports venues, can lead to various health issues. These
include physical symptoms such as cold, fatigue, headache, and hearing impairment (Orola,
2020; Ebrahimi et al., 2021; Adekunle et al., 2021). Research has shown that SPL
Studies indicate that the auditory system dynamically adjusts its temporal filters based
on SPL, affecting sound detection and localization (Siveke et al., 2019). Cardiac responses
also vary with sound intensity; near-threshold sounds (15-40 dB SPL) initially decrease heart
rate, while louder sounds (65-90 dB SPL) increase it (Shoushtarian et al., 2019). In senior
adults, exposure to different acoustic stimuli results in heart rate and blood pressure
fluctuations. Sounds below 55-65 dB(A) correlate with increased comfort and less
physiological impact. Urban areas with high noise pollution, such as event centers and
2
markets, recorded the highest SPL and noise pollution levels, potentially leading to various
al., 2021). Sound Pressure has been observed to affect both students and professors in
academic settings.
and academic atmosphere. Studies have found that classroom noise levels often exceed
recommended limits, negatively affecting students and professors (Dias et al., 2019). Brill &
Wang (2021) found that higher non-speech noise levels in K-12 classrooms correlated with
lower math test scores and observed that intense noise levels decreased attention and
increased errors in reading and writing tasks among students. As sound pressure levels
increase, problem-solving abilities decrease. Noise mapping in university settings reveals that
areas near highways, canteens, and parking spaces often exceed the 55 dB(A) threshold, with
improve the academic atmosphere, researchers suggest implementing noise control measures
such as physical barriers, tree planting, and better parking management (Mulyono et al.,
2021). Research on sound pressure levels (SPL) in various settings reveals potential health
impacts. In physical education environments, SPL ranged from 57-78 dB(A), with teachers
reporting significant discomfort despite relatively low levels (Portela et al., 2019).
The researchers are affiliated with SLSU- Tomas Oppus, a teacher institution that
offers college programs and operates a laboratory high school for junior and senior high
school education. They have encountered disruptive noise levels, including shouting and loud
conversations among students, particularly when teachers are absent. Motivated by their
experiences and the desire to positively impact the campus environment, the researchers aim
to systematically measure and analyze sound pressure levels (SPL) to identify areas of high
3
noise. This study seeks to provide effective solutions to enhance the academic atmosphere
and improve the overall learning experience for the students and the faculty.
settings where concentration and effective learning are essential. The study aims to address
the growing concerns about ambient noise levels across an academic campus, specifically at
Southern Leyte State University - Tomas Oppus. Unlike earlier studies that focused solely on
classroom noise and its direct effects on students' performance, this research will take a
broader approach by mapping sound pressure levels (SPL) across the Academic and
which is crucial for identifying noise hotspots and their potential impact on the well-being of
students, faculty, and staff. The findings will not only highlight areas exceeding acceptable
noise thresholds but will also serve as a foundation for proposing practical noise mitigation
strategies. The significance of this study lies in its ability to contribute to a healthier academic
Academic and Laboratory High School. By integrating SPL measurements into a noise
mapping model, this study aims to enhance the campus's acoustic environment and improve
Objectives
This section aims to outline the specific objectives of the study, focusing on
understanding and analyzing noise levels within the Academic and Laboratory High School
1. To identify the areas within the Academic and LHS buildings with the highest noise levels.
2. To develop a comprehensive noise map that visualizes the sound pressure levels across the
building.
3. To analyze patterns and trends in noise levels during different times of the day.
Students. This study will help students understand how noise levels affect their learning and
performance.
Teachers. It will provide insights to help educators minimize disruptions and improve
teaching strategies.
School Administrators. The findings will aid in managing noise pollution and optimizing
Facility Planners. The data can inform future infrastructure improvements for quieter
learning spaces.
Future Researchers. This study will serve as a foundation for further research on noise
Chapter 2
This section identifies, analyzes, and synthesizes the relevant literature related to the
research. The purpose of this section is to situate the study within the existing body of
knowledge and to demonstrate the novelty, significance, and relevance of the research.
Results showed that binaural noise significantly influenced both speech perception and
While the specific statistical methods were not explicitly stated, it is likely that t-tests or
ANOVAs were used to assess the differences between the noise conditions. The study
with 37 second-grade participants. (Leist, L. et al., 2023) highlighted the need for more
realistic binaural noise scenarios in research to better understand how classroom noise
for both students and teachers. Noise, reverberation, and poor speech clarity have been
6
identified as significant factors that affect academic performance, concentration, and well-
being. This section reviews the findings and insights from relevant literature, particularly
focusing on the work by Mogas-Recalde, Palau, and Márquez (2021), who conducted a
systematic literature review on the subject. Mogas-Recalde et al. (2021) explored how
classroom acoustics influence both students and teachers, underlining that excessive noise
exposure and poor acoustic conditions can lead to stress, fatigue, cognitive decline, and even
hearing loss. Their research highlighted that noise not only disrupts concentration but also
impairs speech comprehension, which can cause frustration and confusion among students.
For teachers, persistent noise exposure was found to negatively impact vocal health and
increase stress levels, further affecting their teaching effectiveness. The study employed
descriptive statistics to summarize key data, such as average noise levels and their variance
across different classrooms, and correlation analysis to measure the relationship between
noise levels and student performance. Results showed a negative correlation, suggesting that
higher noise levels are associated with decreased cognitive performance and academic
reverberation through the use of sound-absorbing materials, and enhancing speech clarity
with appropriate amplification and teacher positioning. Additionally, their findings stressed
the need for schools to implement continuous monitoring systems to maintain effective
acoustic environments. Conducted at the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain), the research
drew from various studies, underscoring that smart classrooms equipped with proper acoustic
solutions can significantly enhance learning outcomes. The researchers advocated for
minimize acoustic distractions. By prioritizing acoustics, schools can create more supportive
learning environments that improve not only academic performance but also the health and
7
well-being of both students and teachers. The reviewed literature emphasizes that proper
findings. Indicating that sound pressure levels (SPL) in university classrooms can
significantly impact both students and professors. Studies consistently show that noise levels
exceed recommended standards, negatively impacting both students and professors (Dias et
al., 2019). Noise interferes with teaching and learning activities, with professors reporting a
greater perception of its impact (Dias et al., 2019). High noise levels force teachers to raise
their voices, leading to vocal fatigue. Factors contributing to excessive noise include internal
in classrooms, such as reducing reverberation, can positively affect students' attention levels
and performance. These findings underscore the need for improved acoustic conditions in
learning environments to enhance student comprehension and reduce vocal strain on teachers.
Research on noise exposure among physical education (PE) reveals concerning levels
of sound pressure in their work environments. Studies have found that PE teachers in
gymnasiums and indoor cycling classes can be exposed to sound levels ranging from 57-
101.6 dB(A) (Portela et al., 2019). These high noise levels can lead to various health issues,
including hearing difficulties, headaches, and irritability. While Portela et al. (2019) reported
that sound levels in PE teachers' work environments were not excessively high, other studies
indicate that 20-25% of PE teachers may be exposed to weekly noise levels above 80 dB(A).
The discrepancies in findings highlight the variability of noise exposure across different
8
settings and underscore the need for further research and implementation of preventive
combining quantitative sound level measurements with qualitative surveys based on ISO
12913-2. This methodology allows for a comprehensive assessment of user perceptions in the
acoustic environment at the University of Salerno's main campus in Fisciano, Italy. The
auditory experiences rather than viewing it as a waste product that requires regulation and
control (Moshona et al., 2024). Participants' perceptions varied by locations. Areas with
natural elements were perceived positively despite nearby noise source, while others were
often viewed negatively, suggesting that visual experiences can influence sound perception.
among first-grade students in Turin, Italy. The study involved 326 respondents and found that
poor classroom acoustics significantly affected student well-being, particularly during group
activities where noise disturbance was prevalent. Using non-parametric tests like the Mann-
Whitney U (MWU) and Spearman’s rho, the researchers highlighted the necessity of
process and overall well-being of both teachers and students. Excessive noise and
According to Polewezyk and Jarosz (2020), the acoustic conditions in the school buildings
were very unfavourable due to the large number of students' noise that can affect the student's
9
significant benefits for both teachers and students can have an enormous impact. The positive
changes observed in concentration, memory, and task completion underscore the importance
classroom setting as it gravely affects the cognitive processes of both students and professors.
According to Dias, et al. (2019) their study titled "Sound Pressure Levels in Classrooms of a
University and Its Effects on Students and Professors" reveals that noise levels are
setting.
Theoretical Background
with a sound level meter (Acoustics, n.d). While vibrations are typically linked to mechanical
systems, air also possesses mass and stiffness, allowing sound to be compressed and
expanded as it moves. A pure tone represents the simplest form of vibration, characterized by
vibrations are known as simple harmonic vibrations. The intensity of a sound wave refers to
the energy transported by the wave per unit area over time, measured using sound pressure
I
SPL=10 log where: I = intensity of a given sound
Io
Io = reference intensity
10
Sound levels are quantified in decibels (dB), which is a logarithmic unit used to
express power or intensity. This unit is the standard for measuring sound
Definition of Terms
- Sound Pressure Level of Classroom Noise (SPL-CN). This refers to the Sound
- Measuring location point. This refers to the locations in which the research will be
Chapter 3
This section of the study recognizes the methodologies relevant in conducting the
study. The purpose of this study is to explain the methods and instruments to be used in the
study thoroughly. Additionally, the functions and the role of each method are described for
comprehensive analysis.
Research Design
The study will utilize a Descriptive Research Design. It will focus on systematically
measuring sound pressure levels (SPL) to provide a comprehensive overview of noise levels
across various locations and times throughout the day. The aim is to identify areas with
significant noise pollution and create a comprehensive noise map that illustrates the spatial
Research Environment
This study will be conducted within the LHS (Laboratory High School) and Academic
Building premises. These locations are ideal for examining sound pressure levels (SPLs) as
they are primary spaces for teaching, learning, and other academic activities. The LHS
12
Building hosts four classrooms utilized by high school students. At the same time, the
Academic Building accommodates various classrooms for senior high school and college
students and an office for the BEED Department. By focusing on these environments, the
study aims to capture the noise levels experienced in different settings and timeframes,
educational spaces.
Sampling procedure
The sampling procedure for this study will involve purposive sampling, focusing
on classrooms in the LHS and Academic buildings during Grade 12 3I’s research class
ensuring coverage of various areas of the room. These points will be chosen based on
typical classroom configurations and potential noise sources. Data collection will occur
over 15 days, with sound pressure levels (SPL) measured using a sound level meter app
of the 8 points per classroom, and the SPL-CN will be mapped and analyzed using the
app. The data will be collected by observing during class, and all observations will be
noted in a notebook for later analysis. A formal permission letter will be submitted to
the campus director’s office to conduct the study, ensuring compliance with
institutional guidelines. Although the data collection process will span 15 days,
occasional disruptions, such as class schedule changes, may affect the consistency of the
Research Instrument
Descriptive statistics will be employed to analyze the sound pressure level (SPL)
data collected from seven designated measurement points within the Academic
Building and the Laboratory High School Building. These measurement points will be
critical for gathering data to assess the sound environment. The SPL data will be
recorded daily at these points, and the mean SPL for each day will be calculated to
provide a comprehensive understanding of the average sound levels across the two
buildings. This process will be conducted over 15 days to ensure a robust dataset that
accounts for variations in daily sound levels. Additionally, a line graph will be utilized to
visualize the fluctuations in SPL over time, showcasing the patterns and identifying the
specific periods when peak SPL values occur. By combining statistical analysis with
graphical representation, the study aims to thoroughly evaluate the sound environment,
reflecting daily averages and time-based trends across the selected measurement
points.
The noise level will be interpreted according to American National Standard for
(ANSI S12.60)
Sound Level
dB Interpretation Color Map
35 Low level
48 – 60 Average level
95 High level
The following steps will be followed during data collection: A permission letter to
conduct the study will be submitted to the campus director's office. Data on sound pressure
levels in classrooms will be gathered at the LHS building and in the academic building
classroom during classes using a sound level meter app. Eight measurement points will be
selected for the study. Observations will be conducted during the designated Grade 12 3I's
(research) class period. After measuring, the SPL-CN will be mapped and analyzed using an
app. Data collection will be carried out over 15 days. All observations will be recorded in a
notebook.
Mapping measurement points will be prepared using a contour map, and noise
mapping will be done using the software Surfer 11.0. Noise mapping aimed to find the noise
level in zones based on the color. Noise mapping will be created using software suffer 11.0
based on the average noise level data. Calculate the equivalent noise at each measurement
point for some time. The noise impact analysis will determine the most frequent noise
References:
Astolfi, A., Puglisi, G. E., Murgia, S., Minelli, G., Pellerey, F., Prato, A., & Sacco, T. (2019).
Influence of classroom acoustics on noise disturbance and well-being for first graders.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Influence-of-Classroom-Acoustics-on-Noise-
and-for-Astolfi-Puglisi/8fca7743c8c24e4763b349c056335acc06df2a2b?
fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0W4YAzh1Qorj2Bwz7LJpcC3LYgD1jaObDG
hhk3NTp0_wL47uMJdWOQ9_k_aem_sa7mrHqRUGKs9E7axcJKBw
Adekunle, A., Omange, M., Tope, A.O., & Msughter, S. (2021). ESTIMATION OF NOISE
Brill, L.C., & Wang, L.M. (2021). Higher Sound Levels in K-12 Classrooms Correlate to
Dias, F.A., Santos, B.K., & Mariano, H.C. (2019). Sound pressure levels in classrooms of a
Ebrahimi, K., Tajik, R., Karami, T., Rahimnejad, S., & Arghavani, F. (2021). Evaluation of
occupational noise exposure and general health of workers in industrial sites: A case
study. Work.
Leist, L., Reimers, C., Fremerey, S., Fels, J., Raake, A., & Klatte, M. (2023). Effects of
Conference Proceedings (Vol. 265, No. 2, pp. 5199-5205). Institute of Noise Control
Engineering.
Mancini, S., Mascolo, A., Graziuso, G., & Guarnaccia, C. (2021). Soundwalk, questionnaires
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50356977_Soundscapes_and_environmental
_noise_management
Mogas-Recalde, J., Palau, R., & Márquez, M. (2021). How classroom acoustics influence
Moshona, C., Fiebig, A., Aletta, F., Chen, X., Kang, J., Mitchell, A., Oberman, T., & Schulte-
https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2024-0002
Mulyono, T., Rochadi, D., & Widiasanti, I. (2021). Noise mapping in campus a
Orola, B.A. (2020). Indoor Sound Pressure Level and Associated Physical Health Symptoms
Portela, B.S., Constantini, A., Tartaruga, P., Henrique, P., & Zannin, T. (2019). Sound
Polewczyk, I., & Jarosz, M. (2023). Teachers’ and students’ assessment of the influence of
Acoustics. https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2020.134057
Siveke, I., Lingner, A., Ammer, J.J., Gleiss, S.A., Grothe, B., & Felmy, F. (2019). A
Shoushtarian, M., Weder, S., Innes-Brown, H., & McKay, C.M. (2019). Assessing hearing by