Lesson 1 the Concept and Principles of Inclusive Assessment
Lesson 1 the Concept and Principles of Inclusive Assessment
Bautista
Instructor
Eligibility for
special education Is the student eligible for special education and
services related services?
Program
evaluation Are the instructional programs that are being used
effective?
Accountability
decisions Does what we do lead to desired outcomes?
In assessing students, it is critical to think about the kind of decision
you are making. Different kinds of decisions require different
kinds of assessments (both different tests and different
assessment processes).
For example, if one is attempting to decide whether a student meets
the eligibility criteria for having intellectual disability, it would be
necessary to administer an individual intelligence test.
If one is attempting to plan an instructional program for a student
with intellectual disability, it is not necessary to administer an
intelligence test. Rather, we need to know the specific skills that she
does and does not have.
After we decide a student is eligible for special education
services, our focus should be on assessment of alterable
behaviors (behaviors that can be changed). Educators
can work to enhance student competence in reading, math,
writing, and other academic content areas. They can change
the way they teach students to decode words or to write in
complete sentences.
As educators, we can change what happens in school. As
citizens, we can work to change what happens outside of
school.
The instruction a student has received is assessed to
ascertain whether the student’s difficulties stem from
inappropriate curriculum or inadequate teaching.
When instruction is found to be inadequate, the student
should be given appropriate instruction to determine
whether it alleviates the difficulty.
When appropriate instruction fails to remediate the
difficulty, further assessment of the student is carried out.
Assessing Instruction
INSTRUCTIONAL CHALLENGE
When instruction is found to be inadequate, the student
should be given appropriate instruction to determine
whether it alleviates the difficulty.
When appropriate instruction fails to remediate the
difficulty, further assessment of the student is carried out.
INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
Instruction involves more than appropriate curriculum. It is
a complex activity, the outcomes of which depend on the
interaction of many factors. Recognition of this fact has led
to efforts to assess the qualitative nature of students’
instructional environments (Ysseldyke & Christenson, 2002).
In doing so, educators gather information on the extent to
which evidence-based components of effective instruction
are present in the instruction that individual students
receive.
INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
• Classroom management: Classroom management refers
to a collection of organizational goals centered on using
time wisely in order to maximize learning and on
maintaining a safe classroom environment that is
conducive to student learning.
• Learning management: The organization and
management of the classroom to ensure learning require
careful attention to detail. Essentially, teachers must
oversee the learning situation.
Assessing Learners
When students have received appropriate instruction but
are still experiencing academic or behavioral problems,
school personnel usually begin to assemble existing
information to document the nature of the problem (that is,
to identify specific learning strengths and weaknesses) and
to generate hypotheses about the problem’s likely solution.
They do so using observations, recollections, tests, and
professional judgments.
School personnel sometimes equate testing and assessment.
Testing consists of administering a particular set of
questions to an individual or group of individuals to obtain a
score. That score is the end product of testing. A test is
only one of several assessment techniques or procedures for
gathering information.
During the process of assessment, data from observations,
recollections, tests, and professional judgments all come into
play.
• It provides highly accurate, detailed, verifiable
information not only about the person being assessed
Observations but also about the surrounding contexts. Observations
can be categorized as either nonsystematic or
systematic.