Scribd
Upload
4 views

EBD1

Uploaded by

ERNIE CERADO
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views

EBD1

Uploaded by

ERNIE CERADO
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Journal of Entrepreneurship Education Volume 23, Issue 3, 2020

SPECIAL NEED STUDENTS (DISORDER) RESPONSE


LEVEL ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP CLASSROOM: A
CASE STUDY OF BINUS UNIVERSITY, INDONESIA
Gatot Hendra Prakoso, Bina Nusantara University
Indriana, Bina Nusantara University
Indira Tyas Widyastuti, Bina Nusantara University
Ira Setyawati, Bina Nusantara University
ABSTRACT

Using the in-depth interview, this study aims to find out how the disorder students
(disorder SNS) performed in the entrepreneurship classrooms. The findings show that the
students with anxiety disorder could have the better performance in the entrepreneurship
classroom, compared to the ADHD and autistic disorder SNS. These findings were found based
on three themes of this paper: the types of disorder SNS in the entrepreneurship classes; the
disorder SNS engagement in the entrepreneurship classroom, and disorder SNS responds in the
entrepreneurship classrooms.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Education, Anxiety, ADHD, Autistic, Response.

INTRODUCTION
The idea of inclusion has been considered as the most discussed topic in all over the
world. From the early years of the 18th century, the concept of full inclusion had been adopted in
order to give the chances for the students with disabilities the chances to have the same education
experiences as the other (normal) students (Alqaryouti, 2010). Inclusion has been considered as
the fair way to give the chances for the students with disabilities to have the similar education
experiences. Lewis et al. (1994) cited the statement that inclusion means different thing to people
who wish different things from it. Inclusion was also determined as a fundamental reorganization
of the teaching and learning process.
Citing the statements of Obiakor et al., (2012) stated that the inclusions of students with
disabilities in general education has been a quite serious topic to be discussed. The inclusion in
schools was meant to create equality and provide social interactions for students of all
backgrounds and abilities. The inherent inequality stems from the stigma created by purposeful
segregation would generate the inferiority feeling which would impact the hearts of the special
need students, and conditions like that would never be undone (Harper, 2013)
Referring to the statement of Obiakor et al. (2012), it is stated that they believe that the
conditions of the special need students could be improved by giving them the inclusive
education, so the special need students would have the chance to be educated with their peers,
the students without special needs.
Lewis et al. (1994) stated that the school systems are moving forward to the inclusion.
They are moving to the way of education special need students (SNS) in general education
classroom, as they cited the statement of Putnam et al. (1995). Based on the spirit of inclusive

1 1528-2651-23-3-576
Citation Information: Prakoso, G.H., Indriana., Widyastuti, I.T., & Setyawati, I. (2020). Special need students (disorder) response
level on entrepreneurship classroom: A case study of Binus University, Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 23(3).

You might also like