SOF dbg collectorate (1) pdf
SOF dbg collectorate (1) pdf
Versus
1. That I am presently posted as Senior Deputy Collector I/C Jila lok Suchna
Prasakha, Darbhanga and as such well acquainted with the facts and
3. That I have gone through the contents of the writ application filed by the
4. That the statements made in paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
23, 24, 26 & 27 of the writ application do not require any reply.
2
5. That the instant writ application has been filed for quashing of order dated
with the Case No. A 4570 of 2022, where the Ld. Chief Information
officer cum Circle Officer, Jale, Darbhanga and to stay the order dated
with the case No. A 4570 of 2022 during the pendency of the writ
application. The matter was heard on 06.11.2023 by this Hon’ble Court and
after hearing the parties the Hon’ble Court has directed to file the reply.
4 & 5 has the highest regard of the majesty of this Hon’ble Court for the
order passed by it and is duty bound to comply the order of the Hon’ble
court and in the same, in obedience to and compliance of the order of the
Hon’ble court vide order dated 06.11.2023 passed in C.W.J.C No. 6584 of
2023 , the present counter affidavit is being taken before your Lordship.
submitted that the monetary fine of Rs 25000/- was imposed upon the then
Public Information officer cum circle officer, Jale, Darbhanga namely Sri
3
Kamal Kumar in connection with case No. A 6334 of 2018 by the Hon’ble
circle officer Jale Shri Anil Kumar Mishra , vide memo no 1895 dated
circle officer Sri Kamal Kumar was transferred in June 2019 to Ara Sadar
that’s why, whether monetary fine was deposited or not is not known and
again the present CO Jale (Petitioner in this case) vide memo no 2866 dated
fine was imposed upon the then circle officer Jale, Darbhanga Sri Kamal
Kumar angrily has taken away all the original file relating to the monetary
fine imposed upon in connection with case No. A 6334 of 2018 by the
Hon’ble State Information Commission, Patna, Bihar and during his tenure
subject, he used to take it out from post and in this letter petitioner asked
Sri Kamal Kumar from the District magistrate Darbhanga so that’s why
petitioner was not able to make correspondence with the then Circle officer
Sri Kamal Kumar. It is pertinent to note that Petitioner vide memo no 1525
Ara Sadar , thus the petitioner was fully aware of present posting of Shri
Kamal Kumar.
The Petitioner has not taken any necessary legal desired steps Instead a
he wrote a letter to Ara Sadar to confirm payment of fine nor did he lodged
FIR or Sanha when the official government record is missing from the
office of Petitioner.
between respondent no 6 and the then Circle officer Sri Kamal Kumar as
respondent no 6/ Applicant has not been asking any indiscreet and partial
9. That in reply to statements made in paragraph 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20 of the
filed form ‘A’ on 02.09.2020 to seek information and second appeal A 4570
unreasonable delay has been done by the Public Information Officer cum
monetary fine recovered which has been imposed upon the then Public
Information Officer cum Circle Officer Jale, Darbhanga Sri Kamal Kumar.
Information Commission regarding the same & thus SIC passed such an
impugned order. State Chief Information Commission has given the next /
be delivered and if show cause is not submitted by the next hearing fine
shall be imposed.
23.06.2022 has not been complied with. The present petitioner himself is
6 in connection of case no A 6334 of 2018 and also show cause reply was
herein as Annexure 2 A.
Darbhanga to present his side by submitting the answer to the show cause
but still the answer to the show cause pertaining to case A4570/2022 was
not submitted as why fine was not deposited even after elapse of one year
eight months.
10. That in reply to statements made in paragraph 21,22, & 25 of the writ
transpires the fact that there were sufficient time and opportunities were
submit his points and deliver the information to the Appellant /respondent
6 but every time petitioner avoided the order intentionally and deliberately
and there are no violation of petitioner’s rights under Article 14, 16 & 21
the correspondence of letter which taking place between the officials. That
11. That it is further respectfully submitted that the submitted copies of the
correspondence letter between the officials signifies the fact that the
application.
8
Series.
12. That it is further submitted that after the various opportunities given to
Shri Kamal Kumar, the then Public Information Officer cum Circle officer
cum Circle officer(Petitioner) & the Petitioner himself failed to give reply
petitioner himself.
Kamal Kumar along with Order to recover the imposed fined amount.
9
13. That it is further submitted that Senior Deputy Collector I/C Lok Suchana
Prasakha, Darbhanga Vide Memo No 1528 & 1529 dated 06.12.2023 wrote
letter to Circle Officer, Jale referring Memo No. 2866 dated 19.09.2022
Certificate Case against the then Circle Officer Shri Kamal Kumar for his
6 A.
14. That in view of the nature and contents of the writ application, paragraph
reply has been filed and the statements not specifically denied may not be
15. That the statements made in the counter affidavit are true to my knowledge
and information as derived from the records as well as made by the way of
16. That the annexure are true photo copies of their respective originals.
Advocate Senior Deputy Collector I/C Jila lok District Magistrat, Darbhanga
Patna High Court Suchna Prasakha, Darbhanga
10