Toxicity of Nano Zinc Oxide To Mitochondria: Toxicology Research August 2012
Toxicity of Nano Zinc Oxide To Mitochondria: Toxicology Research August 2012
net/publication/255766693
CITATIONS READS
55 363
8 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Qiuliyang Yu on 01 April 2014.
Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are increasingly applied in a diverse array of industrial and
commercial products. Therefore, it is urgently required to characterize their toxic behavior. ZnO NPs have
Published on 26 June 2012. Downloaded on 24/02/2014 14:07:27.
been reported to induce toxic effects at the levels of the individual organism, tissue, cell and DNA.
However, little is known about the potential impacts of ZnO NPs at a subcellular level. In the present
work, we investigated the toxicity of ZnO NPs to the isolated rat liver mitochondria. We found that
treatment of mitochondria with ZnO NPs resulted in collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ),
swelling, depression of respiration, inner membrane permeabilization to H+ and K+, alterations of
ultrastructure, release of cytochrome c, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and Zn2+ liberation
from ZnO NPs. These results suggested that ZnO NPs can increase the inner membrane permeability and
impair the respiratory chain, thus leading to energy dissipation, oxidative stress and even apoptosis. This
putative mechanism helps us learn more about the toxicology of this nanomaterial.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 | 137
View Article Online
adenosine diphosphate (ADP), 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) and 2.6 Measurement of mitochondrial swelling
valinomycin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). All
other reagents were of analytical reagent grade, and all solutions Mitochondrial swelling was measured by alterations of absor-
were prepared with deionized distilled (DI) water. DI water was bance at 540 nm.27 Mitochondria (0.5 mg ml−1) was suspended
prepared from a Milli-Q-RO4 water purification system in 2 ml solution C (200 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris-Mops, 1 mM
(Millipore). Pi, 10 μM EGTA-Tris, 2 μM rotenone, and 3 μg ml−1 oligo-
mycin, pH 7.4). Spectra were recorded at room temperature on a
UNICO 4802 double beam spectrophotometer (Dayton, NJ).
2.2 Preparation of ZnO NPs suspension Ca2+ (1 μM) were added to the buffer before injecting ZnO NPs.
Similar experiments were conducted to test mitochondrial
A stock suspension was prepared by suspending 80 mg of ZnO inner membrane permeabilization to H+ and K+ in potassium
NPs in 8 ml of H2O containing 4 mg BSA.22,23 The stock acetate (KAc) and potassium nitrate (KNO3) medium, respec-
suspension was sonicated for 10 min before used.24 tively. The KAc medium contained 135 mM KAc, 5 mM
HEPES, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2 μM rotenone, and
2.3 Characterization of ZnO NPs 1 μM valinomycin ( pH 7.4), and the KNO3 medium contained
135 mM KNO3, 5 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM EDTA,
Published on 26 June 2012. Downloaded on 24/02/2014 14:07:27.
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ZnO NPs were and 2 μM rotenone ( pH 7.4).28
untreated before scanned by a JSM-6700F FE-SEM (JEOL Ltd,
Tokyo, Japan).
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ZnO NPs were 2.7 Measurement of mitochondrial respiration
dispersed in H2O, drop-coated on copper TEM grids and
Oxygen consumption of isolated mitochondria was measured
scanned by a Tecnai G2 TEM at 200 kV (JEOL Ltd, Tokyo,
with a Clark-type oxygen electrode in a 1 ml thermostated,
Japan).
water-jacketed, closed chamber with magnetic stirring.29 The
incubation buffer contained 125 mM sucrose, 65 mM KCl,
2.4 Isolation of mitochondria 2.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM HEPES, and 3 μM
rotenone ( pH 7.2). State 4 respiration was considered upon
Wistar rats (170–250 g) were purchased from Hubei Research addition of 5 mM succinate as the energizing substrate.
Centre of Experimental Animals (Wuhan, China). Liver mito- To induce state 3 respiration, 0.3 mM ADP was added sub-
chondria were isolated by differential centrifugation according to sequently. Finally, 1 μM FCCP was added to induce uncoupled
the literature with minor modifications.25 The fresh liver tissue respiration.
was chilled on ice bath, minced with scissors, and washed in
solution A (0.22 M mannitol, 0.07 M sucrose, 0.02 M HEPES,
2 mM Tris-HCl, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). About 5 g mince 2.8 Measurement of mitochondrial ultrastructure
were suspended in 100 ml solution A containing 0.4% BSA and
Using the techniques of ultrathin sectioning and transmission
homogenized with Dounce Tissue Grinders.
electron microscopy, the ultrastructure of mitochondria was
The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 g for 2 min. Then,
studied. Mitochondria under various experimental conditions
the supernatant was centrifuged at 17 500 g for 3 min. The
were fixed for 30 min at 4 °C using glutaraldehyde at a final con-
resulting pellet was washed in solution A and centrifuged at
centration of 2.5% (v/v) in PBS buffer, centrifuged to micro-
17 500 g for 4 min. Subsequently, the pellet was resuspended in
pellets, postfixed with 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide and
solution B (0.22 M mannitol, 0.07 M sucrose, 0.01 M Tris-HCl,
dehydrated. The ultrastructure of mitochondria was observed
and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 17 500 g for
with a Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope.30
4 min. The pellet was finally resuspended in solution B at a ratio
of 10 ml solution B per 10 g of starting material. All operations
were performed at 0–4 °C. 2.9 Cell viability assay
Mitochondrial protein concentration was measured by the
Biuret method using bovine serum albumin as the standard. The cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs was assessed by MTT assay.
Before experiments, we measured mitochondrial respiration with HeLa cells were used for toxicity evaluation and treated with
a Clark-type oxygen electrode and only mitochondrial suspen- various concentrations of ZnO NPs for 72 h. Optical density
sions with a RCR ≥ 3.0 were used. measurements were carried out using an ELISA reader at
450 nm (BioTech, China) and the IC50 value (50% inhibitory
concentration) was calculated by a four-parameter logistic
2.5 Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential equation.
To monitor mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ), fluor-
escence emission intensity of tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester 2.10 Measurement of cytochrome c
(TMRE) was detected by a LS-55 fluorophotometer (Perkin-
Elmer, Norwalk, CT) equipped with a quartz cell of 1.0 cm path To confirm apoptosis caused by ZnO NPs, the release of cyto-
length at 25 °C (λex = 535 nm, λem = 590 nm). Mitochondria chrome c from mitochondria was detected by Cyt-C ELISA Kit
were dispersed in solution B with a final concentration of (Shanghai Hua Yi Bio Technology Co. Ltd, China) according to
0.5 mg ml−1.26 manufacture’s protocol.
138 | Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
The level of free zinc released from ZnO NPs was measured by
IRIS Intrepid II XSP inductively coupled plasma-atomic emis-
sion spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (Thermo, USA). ZnO NPs dissolu-
tion was assessed using dialysis membrane of 3500 Da
molecular weight cutoff.
(Fig. 10).28
3. Results
3.1 Characterization of ZnO NPs
The morphology and size of ZnO NPs were observed by SEM and
TEM. ZnO NPs were rod-shaped with a size of 100 nm (Fig. 1).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 | 139
Published on 26 June 2012. Downloaded on 24/02/2014 14:07:27. View Article Online
Fig. 5 shows the effects of ZnO NPs on mitochondrial respir- Mitochondrial ultrastructure was observed by a transmission
ation rate. In the absence of ZnO NPs, a low respiration rate at electron microscope. In the absence of ZnO NPs (Fig. 6A), most
state 4 (when ADP is exhausted) indicates an intact inner mem- of the isolated rat liver mitochondria maintained the structural
brane of isolated mitochondria.33,34 Thus mitochondria can integrity, as demonstrated by their normal shape with a well-
maintain a sufficiently high electrochemical proton potential to defined outer membrane, a narrow inter membrane space and
restrict electron transport.35 Meanwhile, the high rate at state 3 rich cristae.36 Because of a relatively high osmolarity of the
140 | Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 | 141
Published on 26 June 2012. Downloaded on 24/02/2014 14:07:27. View Article Online
Fig. 6 Effects of ZnO NPs on mitochondrial ultrastructure. Mitochondria were incubated in the standard medium with 0 (A), 5 (B) or 50
(C) μg ml−1 ZnO NPs.
Fig. 7 Cell viability of HeLa cells was determined by MTT assay after
72 h stimulation with various concentrations of ZnO NPs. Data were
shown as mean ± SD (n = 6). Fig. 8 Cytochrome c release from mitochondria induced by ZnO NPs.
142 | Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 | 143
View Article Online
3 R. Damoiseaux, S. George, M. Li, S. Pokhrel, Z. Ji, B. France, T. Xia, 31 J. A. F. Vicente, M. S. Santos, A. E. Vercesi and V. M. C. Madeira,
E. Suarez, R. Rallo and L. Mädler, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 1345–1360. Pestic. Sci., 1998, 54, 43–51.
4 T. Puzyn, B. Rasulev, A. Gajewicz, X. Hu, T. P. Dasari, A. Michalkova, 32 M. A. S. Fernandes, A. S. Jurado, R. A. Videira, M. S. Santos,
H. M. Hwang, A. Toropov, D. Leszczynska and J. Leszczynski, Nat. A. J. M. Moreno, A. Velena, G. Duburs, C. R. Oliveira and
Nanotechnol., 2011, 6, 175–178. J. A. F. Vicente, Mitochondrion, 2005, 5, 341–351.
5 V. L. Colvin, Nat. Biotechnol., 2003, 21, 1166–1170. 33 V. J. Adlam, J. C. Harrison, C. M. Porteous, A. M. James, R. A. J. Smith,
6 X. Zheng, R. Wu and Y. Chen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45, M. P. Murphy and I. A. Sammut, FASEB J., 2005, 19, 1088–1095.
2826–2832. 34 L. Sun, C. Luo, J. Long, D. Wei and J. Liu, Mitochondrion, 2006, 6,
7 M. Li, L. Zhu and D. Lin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45, 136–142.
1977–1983. 35 M. D. Brand and D. G. Nicholls, Biochem. J., 2011, 435, 297.
8 D. Xiong, T. Fang, L. Yu, X. Sima and W. Zhu, Sci. Total Environ., 2011, 36 V. Petronilli, J. Šileikytė, A. Zulian, F. Dabbeni-Sala, G. Jori, S. Gobbo,
409, 1444–1452. G. Tognon, P. Nikolov, P. Bernardi and F. Ricchelli, Biochim. Biophys.
9 N. M. Franklin, N. J. Rogers, S. C. Apte, G. E. Batley, G. E. Gadd and Acta, 2009, 1787, 897–904.
P. S. Casey, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41, 8484–8490. 37 B. A. Scalettar, J. R. Abney and C. R. Hackenbrock, Proc. Natl. Acad.
10 B. De Berardis, G. Civitelli, M. Condello, P. Lista, R. Pozzi, G. Arancia Sci. U. S. A., 1991, 88, 8057–8061.
and S. Meschini, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2010, 246, 116–127. 38 C. B. L. Campos, G. R. Degasperi, D. S. Pacífico, L. C. Alberici,
11 A. Sasidharan, P. Chandran, D. Menon, S. Raman, S. Nair and R. S. Carreira, F. Guimarães, R. F. Castilho and A. E. Vercesi, Biochem.
M. Koyakutty, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 3657–3669. Pharmacol., 2004, 68, 2197–2206.
12 A. Kumar, A. K. Pandey, S. S. Singh, R. Shanker and A. Dhawan, Free 39 Y. Uechi, H. Yoshioka, D. Morikawa and Y. Ohta, Biochem. Biophys.
Published on 26 June 2012. Downloaded on 24/02/2014 14:07:27.
Radical Biol. Med., 2011, 51, 1872–1881. Res. Commun., 2006, 344, 1094–1101.
13 K. B. Wallace and A. A. Starkov, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 2000, 40 B. Chance and G. Williams, J. Biol. Chem., 1955, 217, 383–393.
40, 353–388. 41 A. Floridi, M. D. Padova, R. Barbieri and E. Arcuri, Biochem. Pharma-
14 Y. Liu, F. Deng, R. Zhao, X. Shen, C. Wang and S.-S. Qu, Chemosphere, col., 1999, 58, 1009–1016.
2000, 40, 851–854. 42 C. Lee, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1995, 1271, 21–28.
15 A. Szewczyk and L. Wojtczak, Pharmacol. Rev., 2002, 54, 101–127. 43 F. Ricchelli, G. Jori, S. Gobbo, P. Nikolov and V. Petronilli,
16 J. M. Hwang, H. C. Kuo, T. H. Tseng, J. Y. Liu and C. Y. Chu, Arch. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2005, 37, 1858–1868.
Toxicol., 2005, 80, 62–73. 44 J. S. Armstrong, Mitochondrion, 2006, 6, 225–234.
17 M. Norenberg and K. Rao, Neurochem. Int., 2007, 50, 983–997. 45 A. W. C. Leung and A. P. Halestrap, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2008, 1777,
18 N. A. G. Santos, C. Catão, N. Martins, C. Curti, M. L. P. Bianchi and 946–952.
A. Santos, Arch. Toxicol., 2007, 81, 495–504. 46 N. Zamzami and G. Kroemer, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2001, 2, 67–71.
19 N. Sivalingam, J. Basivireddy, K. A. Balasubramanian and M. Jacob, 47 C. Hanley, J. Layne, A. Punnoose, K. Reddy, I. Coombs, A. Coombs,
Arch. Toxicol., 2007, 82, 471–481. K. Feris and D. Wingett, Nanotechnology, 2008, 19, 295103.
20 M. Zoratti, I. Szabò and U. D. Marchi, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2005, 48 M. Premanathan, K. Karthikeyan, K. Jeyasubramanian and
1706, 40–52. G. Manivannan, Nanomed.: Nanotechnol., Biol. Med., 2011, 7, 184–192.
21 R. A. Jones, A. Smail and M. R. Wilson, Eur. J. Biochem., 2002, 269, 49 S. P. Yu, Prog. Neurobiol., 2003, 70, 363–386.
3990–3997. 50 P. Bernardi, S. Vassanelli, P. Veronese, R. Colonna, I. Szabó and
22 M. Horie, K. Nishio, K. Fujita, S. Endoh, A. Miyauchi, Y. Saito, M. Zoratti, J. Biol. Chem., 1992, 267, 2934–2939.
H. Iwahashi, K. Yamamoto, H. Murayama and H. Nakano, Chem. Res. 51 R. A. Eliseev, J. D. Salter, K. K. Gunter and T. E. Gunter, Biochim.
Toxicol., 2009, 22, 543–553. Biophys. Acta, 2003, 1604, 1–5.
23 R. Brayner, R. Ferrari-Iliou, N. Brivois, S. Djediat, M. F. Benedetti and 52 X. R. Liu, J. H. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. S. Ge, F. F. Tian, J. Dai, F. L. Jiang and
F. Fiévet, Nano Lett., 2006, 6, 866–870. Y. Liu, J. Membr. Biol., 2011, 244, 105–112.
24 A. Kumar, A. K. Pandey, S. S. Singh, R. Shanker and A. Dhawan, Free 53 D. Jiang, P. G. Sullivan, S. L. Sensi, O. Steward and J. H. Weiss, J. Biol.
Radical Biol. Med., 2011, 51, 1872–1881. Chem., 2001, 276, 47524–47529.
25 L. A. Pon and E. A. Schon, Mitochondria, Academic Press, 2007. 54 E. Bossy-Wetzel, M. V. Talantova, W. D. Lee, M. N. Schölzke,
26 M. R. Duchen, Diabetes, 2004, 53, S96. A. Harrop, E. Mathews, T. Götz, J. Han, M. H. Ellisman, G. A. Perkins
27 F. Ricchelli, S. Gobbo, G. Moreno and C. Salet, Biochemistry, 1999, 38, and S. A. Lipton, Neuron, 2004, 41, 351–365.
9295–9300. 55 A. M. Brown, B. S. Kristal, M. S. Effron, A. I. Shestopalov,
28 M. A. S. Fernandes, J. B. A. Custódio, M. S. Santos, A. J. M. Moreno P. A. Ullucci, K. F. R. Sheu, J. P. Blass and A. J. L. Cooper, J. Biol.
and J. A. F. Vicente, Mitochondrion, 2006, 6, 176–185. Chem., 2000, 275, 13441–13447.
29 J. Monteiro, P. Oliveira, A. Moreno and A. Jurado, Chemosphere, 2008, 56 W. Lin, Y. Xu, C. C. Huang, Y. Ma, K. B. Shannon, D. R. Chen and
72, 1347–1354. Y. W. Huang, J. Nanopart. Res., 2008, 11, 25–39.
30 V. Petronilli, J. Sileikyte, A. Zulian, F. Dabbeni-Sala, G. Jori, S. Gobbo, 57 M. Ott, V. Gogvadze, S. Orrenius and B. Zhivotovsky, Apoptosis, 2007,
G. Tognon, P. Nikolov, P. Bernardi and F. Ricchelli, Biochim. Biophys. 12, 913–922.
Acta, 2009, 1787, 897–904. 58 M. D. Norenberg and K. V. R. Rao, Neurochem. Int., 2007, 50, 983–997.
144 | Toxicol. Res., 2012, 1, 137–144 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View publication stats