Scribd
Upload
69 views

NEW Post moderation tool

Uploaded by

Daniella Le Roux Booysen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
69 views

NEW Post moderation tool

Uploaded by

Daniella Le Roux Booysen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Annexure J 2

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION TOOL


NAME OF SCHOOL Glenvista High School
DISTRICT GAUTENG D11 SOUTH
SUBJECT Visual Arts

GRADE 11

TASK MODERATED Grade November Exam


NAME OF
MODERATOR

TECHNICAL ASPECTS
Quality Indicators Comment in FULL sentence
1. The question paper is complete with
the marking guideline and
assessment grid analysis.
2. The cover page has all the relevant
details such as subject, grade,
duration, date, marks allocation, and
number of pages.
3. Instructions to candidates are clearly
specified and unambiguous
4. Mark allocation is clearly indicated
per question.
5. The mark allocation on the question
paper is the same as on the marking
guideline.
6. The quality of illustration, pictures,
graphs, diagrams.
7. The marking guideline is efficient in
terms of sufficient alternatives and
allows consistent marking.

STANDARD OF THE TEST


1. The task assesses all specific core
content and skills that should be
covered in this term as per the ATP.
2. The distribution of different cognitive
levels as per policy. Indicate the
distribution.
3. Different types of questions used
(Multiple choice, matching type,
missing words, open-ended, etc.)
4. The correct terminology of the
subject was used to design the test
5. The language used is appropriate for
the level of learners.

MARKING
1. Quality of marking by the teacher.
(Consistency, accountability of ticks,
relevance of marking tool)
2. Marking of all sections of the task.
Signature and dating of the tasks
during marking
3. Compliance to marking standards as
outlined in the marking guideline (e.g.,
writing of subtotals)
4. Evidence of extended opportunities to
learners who did not submit tasks due
to valid reason.
5. Accuracy of calculation of marks on
each learner’s task.

6. Incidence of lenient marking, global


marking or unmarked questions but
marks awarded to learners (be specific)
7. Evidence of feedback (to teachers,
learners, DH) and its possible impact
on the improvement of SBA.
8. Performance analysis of each task is
done by the teacher
9. Any other comment on Marking.

RECORDING
1. The use of SA SAMS working
marksheets and the patch
2. Accuracy of transference of marks from
learner evidence of work to the SA
SAMS marksheet.
3. Evidence of learners who missed SBA
task is provided in the teacher file.

LEARNER PERFORMANCE
1. The quality and standard of learner
responses to each question type.
2. The influence of standard of the test
on the performance of the learners.
3. Correlation between mark allocation
by the teacher and learner responses
4. Do you think the style of marking and
recording may have had impact on
the performance of learners?
Elaborate
5. The learner performance in the task is
comparable to performance in other
formal tasks (consult the SASAMS
working marksheets)

Questions which were not attempted/poorly answered by learners and possible causes. (FOR
COMMON TASKS only)
Poorly Nature of the Possible reasons Recommendations
answered challenge/Type of
questions question

SCHOOL BASED MODERATION


1. Evidence of pre- and post-assessment
moderation of the test? Elaborate
2. Quality of moderation at each level.

Use of different colour pens.


3. Feedback provided to the teacher by the
Departmental Head/Teacher
Moderator/Subject Advisor?
4. Implementation of recommendations
suggested by the moderator at each level.
5. Evidence of HISTORY of the task
provided.
6. Moderator signed off the SA SAMS
working marksheet

SASAMS GENERATED MARKSHEETS


1. Correct transfer of marks to the SA SAMS
2. Identification of “0” “-1”, and blank mark on
the mark-sheet
3. Copy of the marksheet signed off by DH and
Principal.

OVERALL IMPRESSION BY THE MODERATOR


Areas of Good Practice Challenges Recommendations

Name of learners whose files were moderated (For circuit, district and provincial moderation)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

MODERATORS NAME SIGNATURES DATE


School Moderator
Cluster/PLC Moderator
District Moderator
Provincial Moderator

You might also like