Final Group 1 Sample
Final Group 1 Sample
ABC Analysis
Ensure you thoroughly read all chapters without skipping any. The ABC analysis is
designed to help you prioritize based on past trends, but it should not replace
comprehensive preparation.
A
CHAPTER 5
IND AS 115: REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Step 2
• For the purpose of determining the transaction price, an entity shall assume that the goods or services will
be transferred to the customer as promised in accordance with the existing contract and that the contract
will not be cancelled, renewed or modified.
• The nature, timing and amount of consideration promised by a customer affect the estimate of the
transaction price.
• When determining the transaction price, an entity shall consider the effects of all the following
• Transaction Price
i. Consideration payable to customer
ii. Significant Financing component
iii. Variable consideration
iv. Constraining estimates of variable considerations
v. Non cash consideration
Determining stand alone The stand-alone selling price is the price at which an entity would sell a promised
selling price good or service separately to a customer. The best evidence of a stand-alone
selling price is - the observable price of a good or service when the entity sells
that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar
customers.
Suitable methods for estimating the stand-alone selling price of a good or service
include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Adjusted market assessment approach
(b) Expected cost plus a margin approach
(c) Residual approach
A combination of methods may need to be used to estimate the stand-alone
selling prices of the goods or services promised in the contract if two or more of
those goods or services have highly variable or uncertain stand-alone selling
prices.
Allocation of a discount Allocate a discount proportionately to all performance obligations in the contract
on the basis of the relative stand-alone selling prices of the underlying distinct
goods or services.
When to allocate discount to Allocate a discount entirely to one or more, but not all, performance obligations
‘less than all’ performance in the contract if all of the following criteria are met:
Chapter 5 Ind AS 115: Revenue from Contracts with Customers 5-2
obligations? (a) the entity regularly sells each distinct good or service (or each bundle of
distinct goods or services) in the contract on a stand-alone basis;
(b) the entity also regularly sells on a stand-alone basis a bundle (or bundles) of
some of those distinct goods or services at a discount to the stand-alone selling
prices of the goods or services in each bundle; and
(c) the discount attributable to each bundle of goods or services described in (b)
above is substantially the same as the discount in the contract and an analysis of
the goods or services in each bundle provides observable evidence of the
performance obligation (or performance obligations) to which the entire
discount in the contract belongs.
NOTE: As a first step, always allocate the discount entirely to one or more
performance obligations in the contract (if applicable), and then as a second step,
use the residual approach to estimate the stand-alone selling price of a good or
service.
Allocation of variable Variable consideration may be attributable to (1) the entire contract or (2) a
consideration specific part of the contract, such as either of the following:
(a) one or more, but not all, performance obligations in the contract.
(b) one or more, but not all, distinct goods or services promised in a series of
distinct goods or services that forms part of a single performance obligation.
How to Allocate variable Allocate a variable amount (and subsequent changes to that amount) entirely to
consideration? a performance obligation or to a distinct good or service that forms part of a
single performance obligation if both of the following criteria are met:
• the terms of a variable payment relate specifically to the entity's efforts to
satisfy the performance obligation or transfer the distinct good or service (or
to a specific outcome from satisfying the performance obligation or
transferring the distinct good or service); and
• allocating the variable amount of consideration entirely to the performance
obligation or the distinct good or service when considering all of the
performance obligations and payment terms in the contract.
Satisfaction of Revenue
Transfer of
performance recognition
control
obligation achieved
Question 1
XYZ Ltd. sells goods to its customer with a promise to give discount of 5% on list price of the goods provided
that the payments are received from customer within 15 days. XYZ Ltd. sold goods of ₹ 5 lakhs to ABC Ltd.
between 17th March, 20X1 and 31st March, 20X1. ABC Ltd. paid the dues by 15th April, 20X1 with respect to
sales made between 17th March, 20X1 and 31st March, 20X1. Financial statements were approved for issue by
Board of Directors on 31st May, 20X1. State whether discount will be adjusted from the sales at the end of
the reporting period. (RTP May’22)
Answer 1
As per Ind AS 115, if the consideration promised in a contract includes a variable amount, an entity shall
estimate the amount of consideration to which the entity will be entitled in exchange for transferring the
promised goods or services to a customer.
In the instant case, the condition that sales have been made exists at the end of the reporting period
Question 2
A construction services company enters into a contract with a customer to build a water purification plant.
The company is responsible for all aspects of the plant including overall project management, engineering and
design services, site preparation, physical construction of the plant, procurement of pumps and equipment
for measuring and testing flow volumes and water quality, and the integration of all components.
Determine whether the company has a single or multiple performance obligations under the contract?
(MTP 4 Marks Apr’21, Old & New SM)
Answer 2
Determining whether a good or service represents a performance obligation on its own or is required to be
aggregated with other goods or services can have a significant impact on the timing of revenue recognition.
While the customer may be able to benefit from each promised good or service on its own (or together with
other readily available resources), they do not appear to be separately identifiable within the context of
the contract. That is, the promised goods and services are subject to significant int egration, and as a result
will be treated as a single performance obligation.
This is consistent with a view that the customer is primarily interested in acquiring a single asset (a water
purification plant) rather than a collection of related components and services.
Question 3
During 20X1-20X2, XYZ Ltd. completed a large contract to supply a customized equipment for one customer
for a total consideration of ₹ 5,00,000 received fully in cash. As a special arrangement and in order to procure
the customer's order, XYZ Ltd agreed to maintain the equipment for three years from the date of installation.
Had there been no maintenance requirement, the sale would have been for an amount of ₹ 4,85,500. If
maintenance alone was required, it would have cost the customer ₹ 12,500 per annum.
Explain the requirements of Ind AS in relation to the XYZ Ltd.’s supply of customized contract and the
maintenance that has been agreed to be provided to the customer. Ignore discounting and calculate the
amounts to be recognized in the financial statements as at 31st March, 20X2. (MTP 4 Marks, Mar‘22)
Answer 3
As per para 81 of Ind AS 115
• a customer receives a discount for purchasing a bundle of goods or services if the sum of the stand -
alone selling prices of those promised goods or services in the contract exceeds the promised
consideration in a contract.
• except when an entity has observable evidence in accordance with paragraph 82 that the entire
discount relates to only one or more, but not all, performance obligations in a contract, the entity shall
allocate a discount proportionately to all performance obligations in the contract.
• the proportionate allocation of the discount in those circumstances is a consequence of the entity
allocating the transaction price to each performance obligation on the basis of the relative stand-alone
selling prices of the underlying distinct goods or services.
Amount to be recognized:
In this case, there are two separately identifiable performance obligations one being sale of the equipment
and second being maintenance contract for three years.
For recognition of revenue, relative stand-alone selling price of the individual components may be taken and
the consideration allocated in proportion of relative fair values, i.e. 4,85,500: 37,500* (i.e. 12,500 x 3).
Hence, the sale of equipment should be recognised at ₹ 4,64,149 [₹ 5,00,000 x {4,85,500 / (4,85,500 +
37,500)}] when all other conditions for sale of the equipment are fulfilled and the revenue from maintenance
services of ₹ 35,851 [₹ 5,00,000 x {37,500 / (4,85,500 + 37,500)}] should be the service revenue recognised
over a period of three years as per its stage of completion.
Chapter 5 Ind AS 115: Revenue from Contracts with Customers 5-4
Question 4
Telco T Ltd. enters into a two-year contract for internet services with Customer C. C also buys a modem and a
router from T Ltd. and obtains title to the equipment. T Ltd. does not require customers to purchase its
modems and routers and will provide internet services to customers using other equipment that is compatible
with T Ltd.’s network. There is a secondary market in which modems and routers can be bought or sold for
amounts greater than scrap value.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity T Ltd. have?
(MTP 6 Marks, Oct’21 & Apr’22, Old & New SM)
Answer 4
T Ltd. concludes that the modem and router are each distinct and that the arrangement includes three
performance obligations (the modem, the router and the internet services) based on the following evaluation:
Criterion 1: Capable of being distinct
• C can benefit from the modem and router on their own because they can be resold for more than scrap
value.
• C can benefit from the internet services in conjunction with readily available resources –
i.e. either the modem and router are already delivered at the time of contract set- up, they could be bought
from alternative retail vendors or the internet service could be used with different equipment.
Criterion 2: Distinct within the context of the contract
• T Ltd. does not provide a significant integration service.
• The modem, router and internet services do not modify or customize one another.
• C could benefit from the internet services using routers and modems that are not sold by T Ltd. Therefore,
the modem, router and internet services are not highly dependent on or highly inter-related with each
other.
Question 5
Entity WIVITSU Ltd. enters into a three-year service contract with a customer CD Ltd. for Rs. 4,50,000
(Rs.1,50,000 per year). The standalone selling price for one year of service at inception of the contract is
Rs.1,50,000 per year. WIVITSU Ltd. accounts for the contract as a series of distinct services.
At the beginning of the third year, the parties agree to modify the contract as follows:
(i) the fee for the third year is reduced to Rs.1,20,000; and
(ii) CD Ltd. agrees to extend the contract for another three years for Rs.3,00,000 (Rs.1,00,000 per year).
The standalone selling price for one year of service at the time of modification is Rs. 1,20,000. How should
WIVITSU Ltd. account for the modification? Analyze. (MTP 5 Marks, Apr’21)
Answer 5
Paragraph 20 of Ind AS 115, inter alia, states that, “An entity shall account for a contract modification as a
separate contract if both of the following conditions are present:
(a) the scope of the contract increases because of the addition of promised goods or services that are
distinct (in accordance with paragraphs 26–30); and
(b) the price of the contract increases by an amount of consideration that reflects the entity’s stand -alone
selling prices of the additional promised goods or services and any appropriate adjustments to that
price to reflect the circumstances of the particular contract.
In accordance with the above, it may be noted that a contract modification should be accounted for
prospectively if the additional promised goods or services are distinct and the pricing for those goods or
services reflects their stand-alone selling price.
In the given case, even though the remaining services to be provided are distinct, the modification should
not be accounted for as a separate contract because the price of the contract did not increase by an amount
of consideration that reflects the standalone selling price of the additional services. The modification would
be accounted for, from the date of the modification, as if the existing arrangement was terminated and a
new contract created (i.e. on a prospective basis) because the remaining services to be provided are
Question 6
As a part of its sales promotion activities, MIL distributes office utility articles along with its product catalogues
to medical practitioners to familiarize & encourage them to prescribe medicines manufactured by it. No
conditions are attached with the items distributed.
Whether the distribution of office utility articles to medical practitioners is covered by Ind AS 115 ‘Revenue
from Contracts with Customers’? If not, how should the same be accounted by MIL? Give reasons.
(MTP 4 Marks, Mar‘22)
Answer 6
The term ‘contract’ is defined in Ind AS 115 as an agreement between two or more parties that creates
enforceable rights and obligations. In the given case:
• Gifts are distributed by MIL to doctors as a part of its sales promotion activities without there being an
agreement between MIL and the doctors creating enforceable rights and obligations.
• The doctors to whom gifts are distributed are not ‘customers’ of MIL as they have not contracted with it
to obtain goods or services in exchange for consideration.
• The items distributed as gifts are not an output of MIL ordinary activities.
In view of the above, the distribution of gifts to doctors does not fall under the scope of Ind AS 115.
As per Ind AS 38, sometimes expenditure is incurred to provide future economic benefits to an entity, but
no intangible asset or other asset is acquired or created that can be recognised. In the case of the supply
of goods, the entity recognises such expenditure as an expense when it has a right to access those goods.
Examples of expenditure that is recognised as an expense when it is incurred include expenditure on
advertising and promotional activities (including mail order catalogues).
Items acquired by MIL to be distributed as gifts as a part of sales promotion activities have no other purpose
than to undertake those activities. In other words, the only benefit of those items for MIL is to develop or
create brands or customer relationships, which in turn generate revenue. Ind AS 38 requires an entity to
recognise expenditure on such items as an expense when the entity has a right to access those goods. Ind
AS 38 states that an entity has a right to access goods when it owns them, or otherwise has a right to access
them regardless of when it distributes the goods.
In view of the above, MIL should recognise the cost of the items to be distributed as gifts as an expense
when it owns those items, or otherwise has a right to access them, regardless of when it distributes the
items to doctors.
Question 7
A manufacturer gives warranties to the purchasers of its goods. Under the terms of the warranty, the
manufacturer undertakes to make good, by repair or replacement, manufacturing defects that become
apparent within three years from the date of sale to the purchasers.
On 30 April 20X1, a manufacturing defect was detected in the goods manufactured by the entity between 1
March 20X1 and 30 April 20X1.
At 31 March 20X1 (the entity’s reporting date), the entity held approximately one week’s sales in inventories.
The entity’s financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X1 have not yet been finalised.
Three separate categories of goods require separate consideration:
Category 1—defective goods sold on or before 31 March 20X1
Category 2—defective goods held on 31 March 20X1
Category 3—defective goods manufactured in 20Xb1-20X2
State the accounting treatment of the above categories in accordance with relevant Ind AS. (RTP May‘21)
Borrowing Costs
Recognised as an Production of a
expense qualifying asset
Step 2: Calculation of
Borrowing cost to be
Expenditure incurred on Step 1: Calculate Capitalisation capitalised:
Rate (CR*)
QA** x Interest rate Expenditure Incurred on QA x
on such specific borrowings Capitalisation Rate
𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦
(𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑒 3 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛)
CR* = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑
(𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠)
QA** = Qualifying Asset
Note:
1. The amount of borrowing costs that an entity capitalises during a period shall not exceed the amount of
borrowing costs it incurred during that period.
2. In some circumstances, it is appropriate to include all borrowings of the parent and its subsidiaries when
computing a weighted average of the borrowing costs; in other circumstances, it is appropriate for each
subsidiary to use a weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to its own borrowings.
3. All outstanding borrowings of the entity during the period (as stated in the formula) shall exclude
borrowings made specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset until substantially all the
activities necessary to prepare that asset for its intended use or sale are complete
Commencement of capitalisation
starts form the date when the entity first meets all of the following conditions:
• It incurs expenditures for the asset
• It Incurs borrowing costs
• It undertakes activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale.
Question 1
How will you capitalize the interest when qualifying assets are funded by borrowings in the nature of bonds
that are issued at discount?
Y Ltd. issued at the start of year 1, 10% (interest paid annually and having maturity period of 4 years) bonds
with a face value of Rs. 2,00,000 at a discount of 10% to finance a qualifying asset which is ready for intended
use at the end of year 2.
Compute the amount of borrowing costs to be capitalized if the company amortizes discount using Effective
Interest Rate method by applying 13.39% p.a. of EIR. (RTP May’21, SM)
Answer 1
Capitalization Method
As per the Standard, borrowing costs may include interest expense calculated using the effective interest
method. Further, capitalization of borrowing cost should cease where substantially all the activities necessary to
prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
Thus, only that portion of the amortized discount should be capitalized as part of the cost of a qualifying asset
which relates to the period during which acquisition, construction or production of the asset takes place.
Capitalization of Interest
Hence based on the above explanation the amount of borrowing cost of year 1 & 2 are to be capitalized and
the borrowing cost relating to year 3 & 4 should be expensed.
Quantum of Borrowing
The value of the bond to Y Ltd. is the transaction price ie Rs. 1,80,000 (2,00,000 – 20,000) Therefore, Y Ltd will
recognize the borrowing at Rs. 1,80,000.
Computation of the amount of Borrowing Cost to be Capitalized
Y Ltd will capitalise the interest (borrowing cost) using the effective interest rate of 13.39% for two years as
the qualifying asset is ready for intended use at the end of the year 2, the details of which are as follows:
Year Opening Interest expense @ Total Interest paid Closing
Borrowing 13.39% to be capitalised Borrowing
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) = (3) – (4)
1 1,80,000 24,102 2,04,102 20,000 1,84,102
2 1,84,102 24,651 2,08,753 20,000 1,88,753
48,753
Accordingly, borrowing cost of Rs. 48,753 will be capitalized to the cost of qualifying asset.
Question 2
An entity constructs a new office building commencing on 1st September, 20X1, which continues till 31st
December, 20X1 (and is expected to go beyond a year). Directly attributable expenditure at the beginning of
the month on this asset are Rs. 2 lakh in September 20X1 and Rs. 4 lakh in each of the months of October to
December 20X1.
The entity has not taken any specific borrowings to finance the construction of the building but has incurred
finance costs on its general borrowings during the construction period. During the year, the entity had issued
9% debentures with a face value of Rs. 30 lakh and had an overdraft of Rs. 4 lakh, which increased to Rs. 8
lakh in December 20X1. Interest was paid on the overdraft at 12% until 1st October, 20X1 and then the rate
was increased to 15%.
Calculate the capitalization rate for computation of borrowing cost for the period ending 31st December
20X1, in accordance with Ind AS 23 'Borrowing Cost'. (MTP 5 Marks, Mar’21, PYP 8 Marks Nov ’19)
Answer 2
Calculation of capitalization rate on borrowings other than specific borrowings
Nature of general Period of Amount of loan Rate of Weighted average amount
borrowings outstanding (Rs.) interest p.a. of interest
balance (Rs.)
a b c d = [(b x c) x (a/12)]
9% Debentures 12 months 30,00,000 9% 2,70,000
Exam Insights:
Some examinees correctly calculated the amount of finance cost but failed to calculate the weighted
average capital. Due to this they arrived into wrong capitalization rate.
Question 3
VIVI Ltd. has taken a loan of USD 20,000 on ApriI 1, 20X1 for constructing a plant at an interest rate of 5 % per
annum payable on annual basis.
On April 1, 20X1, the exchange rate between the currencies i.e. USD vs Rupees was Rs. 45 per USD. The
exchange rate on the reporting date i.e. March 31, 20X2 is Rs. 48 per USD.
The corresponding amount could have been borrowed by VIVI Ltd. from State bank of India in local currency
at an interest rate of 11% per annum as on ApriI 1, 20X1.
Compute the borrowing cost to be capitalized for the construction of plant by VIVI Ltd. for the period ending
31st March, 20X2. (MTP 8 Marks, Apr’19 & Apr’22, SM)
Answer 3
In the above situation, the Borrowing cost needs to determine for interest cost on such foreign currency loan
and eligible exchange loss difference if any.
(a) Interest on Foreign currency loan for the period:
USD 20,000 x 5% = USD 1,000
Converted in Rs. : USD 1,000 x Rs. 48/USD = Rs. 48,000
(b) Interest that would have resulted if the loan was taken in Indian Currency:
USD 20,000 x Rs. 45/USD x 11% = R5. 99,000
(c) Difference between Interest on Foreign Currency borrowing and local Currency borrowing Rs. 99,000-
48,000 = Rs. 51,000
Increase in liability due to change in exchange difference: USD 20,000 x (48 -45) = Rs. 60,000
Hence, out of Exchange loss of Rs. 60,000 on principal amount of foreign currency loan, only exchange loss to
the extent of Rs. 51,000 is considered as borrowing costs.
Total borrowing cost to be capitalized is as under :
Interest cost on borrowing Rs. 48,000
Exchange difference to the extent considered be Rs. 51,000
an adjustment to Interest cost
Rs. 99,000
The exchange difference of Rs. 51,000 has been capitalized as borrowing cost and the remaining Rs. 9,000 will
be expensed off in the Statement of Prost and loss.
Question 4
PQR Limited is engaged in Tourism business in India. The company has planned to construct a Holiday Resort
(Qualifying Asset) at Shimla. The cost of the project has been met out of borrowed funds of ₹ 100 lakhs at the
rate of 12% p.a. ₹ 40 lakhs were disbursed on 1st April 20X2 and the balance of ₹ 60 lakhs were disbursed on
1st June 20X2. The site planning work commenced on 1st June 20X2, since the Chief engineer of the project
was on medical leave. The company commenced physical construction on 1st July 20X2 and the work of
construction continued till 30th September 20X2 and thereafter the construction activities stopped due to
landslide on the road which leads to construction site. The road blockages have been cleared by the
government machinery by 31st December 20X2. Construction activities have resumed on 1st January 20X3
and has completed on 28th February 20X3.
Answer 4
As per Ind AS 23 ‘Borrowing Costs’, the commencement date for capitalisation of borrowing cost on qualifying
asset is the date when the entity first meets all of the following conditions:
(a) it incurs expenditures for the asset;
(b) it incurs borrowing costs; and
(c) it undertakes activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale.
Further, an entity also does not suspend capitalising borrowing costs when a temporary delay is a necessary
part of the process of getting an asset ready for its intended use or sale. For example, capitalisation continues
during the extended period that high water levels delay construction of a bridge, if such high-water levels
are common during the construction period in the geographical region involved.
An entity shall cease capitalising borrowing costs when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare
the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
Further, paragraph 23 explains that an asset is normally ready for its intended use or sale when the physical
construction of the asset is complete even though routine administrative work might still continue. If minor
modifications, such as the decoration of a property to the purchaser’s or user’s specification, are all that are
outstanding, this indicates that substantially all the activities are complete.
In the given case since the site planning work started for the project on 1st June, 20X2, the commencement
of capitalisation of borrowing cost will begin from 1st June, 20X2.
(i) When landslide is not common in Shimla and delay in approval from District Administration Office is
minor administrative work leftover
In such a situation, suspension of capitalisation of borrowing cost on construction work will be considered for 3
months i.e. from October, 20X2 to December, 20X2 and cessation of capitalization of borrowing cost shall stop
at the time of completion of physical activities.
Accordingly, the borrowing cost to be capitalized will be effectively for 6 months i.e. from 1st June, 20X2 to
30th September, 20X2 and then from 1st January, 20X3 to 28th February, 20X3 i.e. total 6 months. The amount
of borrowing cost will be ₹ 6,00,000 (1,00,00,000 x 6/12 x 12%).
(ii) When landslide is common in Shimla and delay in approval from District Administration Office is major
administrative work leftover
Since landslides are common in Shimla during monsoon period, there shall be no suspension of capitalisation
of borrowing cost during that period.
Further, an asset can be considered to be ready for its intended use only on receipt of approvals and after
compliance with regulatory requirements such as “Fire Clearances” etc. These are very important to declare
the asset as ready for its scheduled operation.
In the given case, obtaining the safety approval is a necessary condition that needs to be complied with strictly
and before obtaining the same the entity will not be able to use the building. Accordingly, it is appropriate to
continue capitalisation until the said approvals are obtained.
Hence, the capitalisation of the borrowing cost will be for 9.5 months i.e. from 1st June, 20X2 till 15th
March, 20X3. The amount of borrowing cost will be ₹ 9,50,000 (1,00,00,000 x 9.5/12 x 12%).
Question 5 LDR
Nikka Limited has obtained a term loan of ₹ 620 lacs for a complete renovation and modernisation of its
Factory on 1st April, 20X1. Plant and Machinery was acquired under the modernisation scheme and
installation was completed on 30th April, 20X2. An expenditure of ₹ 510 lacs was incurred on installation of
Plant and Machinery, ₹ 54 lacs has been advanced to suppliers for additional assets (acquired on 25th April,
20X1) which were also installed on 30th April, 20X2 and the balance loan of ₹ 56 lacs has been used for working
Answer 5
As per Ind AS 23, Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of
a qualifying asset form part of the cost of that asset. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense.
Where, a qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its
intended use or sale.
Accordingly, the treatment of Interest of ₹ 68.20 lacs occurred during the year 20X1-20X2 would be as follows:
(i) When construction of asset completed on 30th April, 20X2
The treatment for total borrowing cost of ₹ 68.20 lakh will be as follows:
Purpose Nature Interest to be capitalized Interest to be charged to
profit and loss account
₹ in lakh ₹ in lakh
Modernization and Qualifying asset [68.20 x (510/620)]
renovation of plant and = 56.10
machinery
Advance to suppliers Qualifying [68.20 x (54/620)] = 5.94
for additional assets asset
Working Capital Not a qualifying [68.20 x (56/620)] = 6.16
asset ______
62.04 6.16
(ii) When construction of assets is completed by 28th February, 20X2
When the process of renovation gets completed in less than 12 months, the plant and machinery and the
additional assets will not be considered as qualifying assets (until and unless the entity specifically considers that
the assets took substantial period of time for completing their construction). Accordingly, the whole of interest
will be required to be charged off / expensed off to Profit and loss account.
Exam Insights:
This question was on Ind AS 23. A very few examinees have committed mistake in consideration where the
examinees had to analyse the treatment of borrowing cost i.e., whether to capitalise or to expense off in the
statement of Profit and Loss. The performance of the examinees in this question is above average and they
have scored 4-5 marks on an average. However, some of the examinees have even scored full out of 7 marks.
Question 6
WEPL Construction Company is constructing a huge building project consisting of four phases. It is expected
that the full building will be constructed over several years but Phase I and Phase II of the building will be
operational as soon as they are completed.
Following is the detail of the work done on different phases of the building during the current year:
(₹ in lakh)
Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV
₹ ₹ ₹ ₹
Cash expenditure 10 30 25 30
Building purchased 24 34 30 38
Total expenditure 34 64 55 68
Total expenditure of all phases 221
Loan taken @ 15% at the beginning of the year 200
After taking substantial period of construction, at the mid of the current year, Phase I and Phase II have
become operational. Find out the total amount to be capitalized and to be expensed during the year.
Answer 6
Particulars ₹
1 Interest expense on loan ₹ 2,00,00,000 at 15% 30,00,000
2 Total cost of Phases I and II (₹ 34,00,000 +64,00,000 98,00,000
3 Total cost of Phases III and IV (₹ 55,00,000 + ₹ 68,00,000) 1,23,00,000
4 Total cost of all 4 phases 2,21,00,000
5 Total loan 2,00,00,000
Interest on loan used for Phases I & II, based on proportionate
30,00,000 13,30,317(approx)
Loan amount = 2,21,000
× 98,00,000
6
Interest on loan used for Phases III & IV, based on
30,00,000 16,69,683
proportionate Loan amount = ×
1,23,00,000
2,21,000
7 (approx.)
Accounting treatment:
1.For Phase I and Phase II
Since Phase I and Phase II have become operational at mid of the year, half of the interest amount of ₹
6,65,158.50 (i.e. ₹ 13,30,317/2) relating to Phase I and Phase II should be capitalized (in the ratio of asset
costs 34:64) and added to respective assets in Phase I and Phase II and remaining half of the interest amount
of ₹ 6,65,158.50 (i.e. ₹ 13,30,317/2) relating to Phase I and Phase II should be expensed off during the year.
2.For Phase III and Phase IV
Interest of ₹ 16,69,683 relating to Phase III and Phase IV should be held in Capital Work-in-Progress till assets
construction work is completed, and thereafter capitalized in the ratio of cost of assets. No part of this interest
amount should be charged/expensed off during the year since the work on these phases has not been
completed yet.
Question 7 LDR
LT Ltd. is in the process of constructing a building. The construction process is expected to take about 18
months from 1st January 20X1 to 30th June 20X2. The building meets the definition of a qualifying asset. LT
Ltd. incurs the following expenditure for the construction:
1st January, 20X1 ₹ 5 crores
30th June, 20X1 ₹ 20 crores
31st March, 20X2 ₹ 20 crores
30th June, 20X2 ₹ 5 crores
On 1st July 20X1, LT Ltd. issued 10% Redeemable Debentures of ₹ 50 crores. The proceeds from the debentures
form part of the company's general borrowings, which it uses to finance the construction of the qualifying
asset, i.e., the building. LT Ltd. had no borrowings (general or specific) before 1st July 20X1 and did not incur
any borrowing costs before that date. LT Ltd. incurred ₹ 25 crores of construction costs before obtaining
general borrowings on 1st July 20X1 (pre-borrowing expenditure) and ₹ 25 crores after obtaining the general
borrowings (post-borrowing expenditure).
For each of the financial years ended 31st March 20X1, 20X2 and 20X3, calculate the borrowing cost that LT
Ltd. is permitted to capitalize as a part of the building cost. (RTP May’23) (MTP 8 Marks March’24)
Answer 7
Applying paragraph 17 of Ind AS 23 to the fact pattern, the entity would not begin capitalising borrowing costs
until it incurs borrowing costs (i.e. from 1 st July, 20X1)
In determining the expenditures on a qualifying asset to which an entity applies the capitalisation rate
(paragraph 14 of Ind AS 23), the entity does not disregard expenditures on the qualifying asset incurred before
the entity obtains the general borrowings. Once the entity incurs borrowing costs and therefore satisfies all
three conditions in para 17 of Ind AS 23, it then applies paragraph 14 of Ind AS 23 to determine the
expenditures on the qualifying asset to which it applies the capitalisation rate.
Question 8
X Ltd. commenced the construction of a plant (qualifying asset) on 1 st September, 20X1, estimated to cost ₹
10 crores. For this purpose, X has not raised any specific borrowings, rather it intends to use general
borrowings, which have a weighted average cost of 11%. Total borrowing costs incurred during the period,
viz., 1st September, 20X1 to 31st March, 20X2 were ₹ 0.5 crore.
The other relevant details are as follows: (₹ in crore)
Month Cost of construction Cash outflows (paid in advance at
Accrued the start of each month)
September 1.50 3.00
October 0.50 1.70
November 1.50 2.50
December 0.50 -
January 1.80 1.00
February 0.70 -
March 3.00 1.50
Based on the above information, discuss the treatment of borrowing cost as per cash outflow basis and accrual
basis and also suggest the appropriate amount of interest that should be capitalised to the cost of the plant
in the financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 20X2? (RTP May’22)
Answer 8
Paragraph 14 of Ind AS 23, inter-alia, states that to the extent that an entity borrows funds generally and
uses them for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset, the entity shall determine the amount of
Question 9
X Ltd. commenced the construction of a plant (qualifying asset) on 1st September, 20X1, estimated to cost ₹
10 crores. For this purpose, X Ltd. has not raised any specific borrowings, rather it intends to use general
borrowings, which have a weighted average cost of 11%. Total borrowing costs incurred during the period,
viz., 1st September, 20X1 to 31st March, 20X2 were ₹ 0.5 crore.
The other relevant details are as follows: (₹ in crore)
3. In determining the borrowing costs to be capitalised, the amount of expenditure on a qualifying asset
include only those expenditures that have resulted in
(a) Payments of cash
(b) Transfers of other assets
(c) The assumption of interest-bearing liabilities
(d) All of the above
Ans: (d)
6. What will be the treatment of exchange difference resulting into unrealised gain while capitalising the
borrowing cost on foreign currency borrowings taken for construction of a qualifying asset?
(a) a would not be adjusted to interest even if there was an adjustment to interest in the previous year on
account of unrealised exchange loss on settlement of translation of same borrowings
8. In determining the borrowing costs to be capitalised, the amount of expenditure on a qualifying asset are
not reduced by
(a) Progress payments received
(b) Grants received in connection with the asset
(c) Income on temporary investment of specific borrowings
(d) Both (a) and (b)
Ans: (c)
LDR Questions
Q3
Q 14
CS 1 (RTP May’24)
FA Ltd. is a company which manufactures aircraft parts and engines and sells them to large multinational
companies like Boeing and Airbus Industries. Following are the details of some of the transactions entered
into by the company:
i. On 1st April 20X2, the company began the construction of a new production line in its aircraft parts
manufacturing shed.
Costs relating to the production line are as follows:
Details Amount ₹
Costs of the basic materials (list price ₹ 12.5 lakhs less 20% trade discount) 10.00
Recoverable goods and services tax incurred but not included in the purchase cost 1.00
Employment costs of the construction staff for three months till 30th June 20X2 1.20
Other overheads directly related to the construction 0.90
Payments to external advisors relating to the construction 0.50
Expected dismantling and restoration costs 2.00
The production line took two months to make ready for use and was brought into use on 31st May 20X2.
The other overheads were incurred during the two-month period ended on 31st May 20X2. They included an
abnormal cost of ₹ 0.3 lakhs caused by a major electrical fault.
The production line is expected to have a useful economic life of eight years. After 8 years, FA Ltd. is legally
required to dismantle the plant in a specified manner and restore its location to an acceptable standard. The
amount of ₹ 2 lakhs included in the cost estimates is the amount that is expected to be incurred at the end of
the useful life of the production line. The appropriate discount rate is 5%. The present value of ₹ 1 payable
in 8 years at a discount rate of 5% is approximately ₹ 0.68.
Four years after being brought into use, the production line will require a major overhaul to ensure that it
generates economic benefits for the second half of its useful life. The estimated cost of the overhaul, at
current prices, is ₹ 3 lakhs.
No impairment of the plant had occurred by 31st March 20X3.
ii. During the year ended 31st March 20X3, FA Ltd. provided consultancy services to a customer regarding the
installation of a new production system related to aircraft parts. The system has caused the customer
considerable problems, so the customer has taken legal action against the Company for the loss of profits
that has arisen as a result of the problems with the system. The customer has claimed damages to the tune
of ₹ 1.6 lakhs.
The legal department of FA Ltd. considers that there is a 25% chance the claim can be successfully
defended. The legal department further stated that they are reasonably confident the Company is covered
by insurance against these types of loss. Th accountant feels nothing needs to be provided for this claim as
the Company is suitably covered against any possible losses.
1. Which of the following items need to be capitalized in determining the cost of Production Line?
(Chapter Ind AS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”)
(a) Abnormal cost of ₹ 0.3 lakhs
(b) Recoverable GST of ₹ 1 lakhs
(c) Initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoration of site of ₹ 2 lakhs
(d) Initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoration of site of ₹ 1.36
lakhs
Ans:(d)
Reason : As per para 16(c) of Ind AS 16, elements of cost of PPE includes the initial estimate of the costs of
dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located, the obligation for which an
entity incurs either when the item is acquired or as a consequence of having used the item during a particular
period for purposes other than to produce inventories during that period.
2. Calculate the company’s associate Flynet Ltd.’s cash flow from operations. (Chapter Ind AS 7 “Statement
of Cash Flows”)
(a) ₹ 158 lakhs
(b) ₹ 170 lakhs
(c) ₹ 174 lakhs
(d) None of the above
Ans:(b)
Cash flow from operating activities – Indirect method
Particulars ₹ in lakhs
Net Income after taxes 120
Add /(Less) No- cash or non-operating item:
Depreciation 25
Profit from sale of land (2)
Tax charges for the year (deferred tax liabilities) 15
158
Decrease in accounts receivables 20
Increase in inventory (10)
Increase in accounts payable 7
Decrease in wages payable (5)
Cash flow from operations 170
3. What accounting treatment should be done in FA Ltd.’s books for the year ending 31st March 20X3, as
the customer has taken legal action against the Company on the loss of profits that has arisen as a result
of the problems with the system?
(Chapter Ind AS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”)
4. Compute the total amount to be charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss with respect to Production
Line for the year ending 31st March 20X3 and the balance of Provision for Dismantling Cost carried to
Balance Sheet. (Chapter Ind AS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”)
(a) ₹ 1.70 lakhs; ₹ 1.36 lakhs
(b) ₹ 1.42 lakhs; ₹ 1.70 lakhs
(c) ₹ 1.76 lakhs; ₹ 1.42 lakhs
(d) ₹ 1.42 lakhs; ₹ 1.76 lakhs
Ans:(c)
5. Compute the cost of the production Line to be capitalized initially on 31st May, 20X2.
(Chapter Ind AS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”)
(a) ₹ 13.26 lakhs
(b) ₹ 14.60 lakhs
(c) ₹ 13.96 lakhs
(d) ₹ 15.76 lakhs
Ans:(a)
Reason for 4 & 5:
Statement showing computation of cost of production line
Particulars ₹ in lakhs
Purchase cost 10.00
GST – recoverable goods and services tax not included -
Employment costs during the period of getting the production line ready for 0.80
use [(1.2/3 month) x 2 month]
Other overheads – abnormal costs of ₹ 0.3 lakhs has been excluded (0.90- 0.30) 0.60
Payment to external advisors – directly attributable cost 0.50
Dismantling costs – recognized at present value (2 lakhs x
0.68) 1.36
Total 13.26
CS 2 (RTP May’24)
HS Limited (HSL) is a car manufacturing company. During the year, HSL has entered into many transactions,
details of which are given below.
i. With the intention to expand, HSL has entered into a Share Purchase Agreement ("SPA") with the
shareholders of FM Limited to purchase 30% stake in FM Limited as at 1st June 20X2 at a price of ₹ 30 per
share. As per the terms of SPA, HSL has an option to purchase an additional 25% stake in FM Limited on or
before 15th June 20X2 at a price of ₹ 30 per share. Similarly, the selling shareholder has an option to sell
additional 25% stake in FM Limited on or before 15th June, 20X2 to HSL at a price of ₹ 30 per share. The
decisions on relevant activities of FM Limited are made in Annual General Meeting / Extraordinary General
Meeting (AGM / EGM). A resolution in AGM / EGM is passed when more than 50% votes are cast in favour
of the resolution. An AGM / EGM can be called by giving atleast 21 days advance notice to all shareholders.
ii. During the year, HSL issued Compulsory Convertible Debentures ("CCDs") on a private placement basis for
₹ 100 lakh. Each CCD is convertible into 5 shares at the end of 4 years from the date of issue and an annual
interest is payable at the rate of 6% p.a. At initial recognition, HSL recognized a liability component of
compound instrument at ₹ 20,79,063. HSL also incurred expenses of ₹ 2,00,000 in connection with the issue
of the instrument. Nature of expenses includes fees paid to legal advisors, registration and regulatory fees.
iii. HSL acquired a 40% stake in NM Limited as at 1st January, 20X2 for ₹ 8,00,000 and classified the investment
in NM Limited as an associate. As at 1st January, 20X2, the carrying amount and fair value of plant &
equipment of NM Limited is ₹ 3,00,000 and ₹ 5,00,000 respectively with remaining useful life of 5 years
(i.e. 20 quarters). From 1st January, 20X2 to 31st March, 20X2, NM Limited generated a profit of ₹ 50,000.
iv. While selling a car, HSL provides a trade discount of 1% on sale price which is mentioned on the invoice.
HSL provides a credit period of 7 days to its customers, however if paid upfront then HSL gives an additional
cash discount of 2%. HSL also provides a voucher worth ₹ 500 with a validity of 1 year which can be used
at an apparel store.
2. How should HSL account for the trade discount, cash discount and voucher given to customers on sale
of a car? (Chapter Ind AS 115 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”)
(a) Trade discount shall be reduced from the revenue however cash discount and value of voucher shall
be charged as expenses.
(b) Trade discount and cash discount both shall be reduced from the revenue however value of voucher
shall be charged as expenses.
(c) Trade discount, cash discount and value of voucher shall be charged as expenses.
(d) Trade discount, cash discount and value of voucher shall be reduced from revenue.
Ans:(d)
Reason:
Discounts and vouchers are incentives given to customers. Incentives For , Paragraph 70 of Ind AS 115, inter-
alia, states that consideration payable to a customer includes cash amounts that an entity pays, or expects to
pay, to the customer (or to other parties that purchase the entity’s goods or services from the customer).
Consideration payable to a customer also includes credit or other items (for example, a coupon or voucher)
that can be applied against amounts owed to the entity (or to other parties that purchase the entity’s goods
or services from the customer). An entity shall account for consideration payable to a customer as a reduction
of the transaction price and, therefore, of revenue. Therefore, cash incentives (payments given to the customer)
would be considered as a reduction in the transaction price and in the measurement of revenue when the goods
are delivered.
3. What shall be the accounting treatment of directly attributable expenses of ₹ 2 lakh incurred in
connection with the issue of Compulsory Convertible Debentures?
(Chapter Accounting and Reporting of Financial Instruments)
(a) Entire ₹ 2,00,000 shall be recognized as expenses in the statement of profit and loss in the
current year.
(b) Entire ₹ 2,00,000 shall be reduced from equity in the current year.
(c) A proportion of ₹ 1,58,419 shall be reduced from equity and Balance of ₹ 41,581 shall be
recognized as interest cost over the period of 4 years using an effective interest method.
(d) Entire ₹ 2,00,000 shall be recognized as interest cost over the period of 4 years using effective
interest method.
Ans:(c)
Reason :
Compulsory convertible debentures with annual interest payout is a compound financial instrument. As per
the information given in the question the liability element to be initially recognised is ₹ 20,79,063. Hence
4. With more acquisitions, at the end of the year, HSL has investments in 2 subsidiaries, 3 associates and 1
joint venture. Which of the following statements is correct in relation to accounting of these investments
in separate financial statements? (Chapter Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements of Group
Entities)
(a) HSL is required to measure all such investments at cost.
(b) HSL has an option to account for the investments in associates and joint ventures using equity
method of accounting and carry the investments in subsidiaries at cost.
(c) HSL has an option for each investment to measure either at cost or in accordance with Ind AS
109.
(d) HSL has an option to measure all such investments either at cost or in accordance with Ind AS
109. The option is available for each category of investments separately (i.e. subsidiaries,
associates and joint venture).
Ans:(d)
Reason:
As per para 10 of Ind AS 27, when an entity prepares separate financial statements, it shall account for
investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates either: (a) at cost, or (b) in accordance with Ind AS
109. The entity shall apply the same accounting for each category of investments.
In the present case, investment in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures are considered to be different
categories of investments. Further, Ind AS 27 requires accounting for the investment in subsidiaries, joint
ventures and associates either at cost, or in accordance with Ind AS 109 for each category of Investment.
Thus, an entity can carry its investments in subsidiaries at cost and its investments in associates or joint
ventures as financial assets in accordance with Ind AS 109 in its separate financial statements.
5. With respect to the SPA entered by HSL, determine the date when HSL gained control over FM Limited
(Chapter Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements of Group Entities)
(a) 1st June, 20X2.
(b) 15th June, 20X2.
(c) On the date of AGM/EGM
(d) On the date when the resolution for AGM/EGM is issued.
Ans:(a)
Reason :
Paragraph 10 of Ind AS 110 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’, states that an investor has power over an
investee when the investor has existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities,
i.e. the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns.
As per the facts given in the question, HSL. has 15 days to exercise the option to purchase 25% additional
stake in FM Ltd. which will give it majority voting rights of 55% (30% + 25%). This is a substantive potential
voting rights which is currently exercisable.
Further, the decisions on relevant activities of FM Ltd. are made in AGM / EGM. An AGM / EGM can be called
by giving atleast 21 days advance notice. A resolution in AGM / EGM is passed when more than 50% votes
are casted in favour of the resolution. Thus, the existing shareholders of FM Ltd. are unable to change the
existing policies over the relevant activities before the exercise of option by HSL. HSL can exercise the option
and get voting rights more than 50% at the date of AGM / EGM. Accordingly, the option contract gives HSL
the current ability to direct the relevant activities even before the option contract is settled. Therefore, HSL
controls FM Ltd. as at 1st June, 20X2.
U Ltd. is engaged in mining and many other industries and prepares its financial statements following Indian
Accounting Standards and follows April-March as their financial year. During the year 20X2 -20X3, the
company has faced some issues and for their solution seeks your professional advice.
(i) U Ltd. and F Ltd. are partners of a joint operation engaged in the business of mining precious metals. The
entity uses a jointly owned drilling plant in its operations. During the year ended 31 st March 20X3, an
inspection was conducted by the government authorities in the mining fields. The inspection authorities
concluded that adequate safety measures were not followed by the entity. As a consequence, a case was
filed and a penalty of ₹ 50 crores has been demanded from U Ltd.
The legal counsel of the company has assessed the demand and opined that appeals may not be useful,
and the appeal orders will be unfavourable to the joint arrangement. Out of ₹ 50 crores (to be paid by U
Ltd.), ₹ 30 crore will be reimbursed by F Ltd. later, as per the terms of the Joint Operation Agreement. At
the year end, actual reimbursement was not received from F Ltd.
(ii) On 1st April 20X2, U Ltd. leased a machine from D Ltd. on a three-year lease. The expected future economic
life of the machine on 1st April 20X2 was eight years. If the machine breaks down, then under the terms of
the lease, D Ltd. would be required to repair the machine or provide a replacement.
D Ltd. agreed to allow U Ltd. to use the machine for the first six months of the lease without the payment
of any rental as an incentive to U Ltd. to sign the lease agreement. After this initial period, lease rentals of
₹ 2,10,000 were payable six-monthly in arrears, the first payment falling due on 31st March 20X3.
(iii) U Ltd. has issued 10,00,000, 9% cumulative preference shares. The Company has arrears of ₹ 15 crores of
preference dividend as on 31st March 20X3, it includes current year arrears of ₹ 1.75 crores. The Company
did not declare any dividend for equity shareholders as well as for preference shareholders.
Further U Ltd. has also issued certain optionally convertible debentures, which are outstanding as at the
year end.
(iv) On 1st January 20X3, U Ltd. acquired 30% of the shares of T Ltd. The investment was accounted for as an
associate in U Ltd.’s consolidated financial statements. Both U Ltd. and T Ltd. have an accounting year end
of 31st March 20X3. U Ltd. has no other investments in associates.
Net profit for the year in T Ltd.’s income statement for the year ended 31 st March 20X3 was ₹ 0.23 crores.
It declared and paid dividend of ₹ 0.1 crore on 1st March 20X3. No other dividends were paid in the year.
(v) On 1st January, 20X3, U Ltd. also acquired a 60% stake in S Ltd. The cash consideration payable was ₹ 1
crore to be paid immediately, and ₹ 1.21 crores after two years. The fair value of net assets of S Ltd. at
acquisition date was ₹ 3 crores. U Ltd. has calculated that its cost of capital is 10%. Non- controlling interest
is measured at the proportionate share of identifiable net assets.
Analyze the transactions mentioned above and choose the most appropriate option in the below questions
1 to 5 in line with relevant Ind AS:
1. With respect to a joint operation engaged in the business of mining precious metals, how will the liability
be disclosed in the books of U Ltd.?
(Chapter – 8.2 Unit 2: Ind AS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”)
(a) Provision for ₹ 20 crores and a contingent liability for ₹ 30 crores
(b) Contingent liability for ₹ 50 crores
(c) Provision for ₹ 30 crores and a contingent liability for ₹ 20 crores
(d) Provision for ₹ 50 crores.
Ans:(d)
2. Calculate the current liability of leased machine from D Ltd. to be shown in the balance sheet as at 31st
March 20X3. (Chapter – 6.8 Unit 8: Ind AS 116 “Leases”)
(a) ₹ 70,000
(b) ₹ 1,40,000
(c) ₹ 3,50,000
(d) ₹ 4,20,000
Ans:(a)
REVIEWER
CA Final
May / November 2025
Publisher:
Disclaimer:
While every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this Reviewer is accurate and sourced from
reliable references, Vivitsu does not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of this material. The content is
provided "as is," without any warranties, whether express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of
performance, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose.
Vivitsu, its afÏliates, partners, agents, or employees shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or decisions made
based on this Reviewer. Readers are solely responsible for any actions they take based on the information provided, and
Vivitsu will not be liable for any consequential, special, or incidental damages arising from the use of this material, even
if advised of the possibility of such damages.
This Reviewer is intended for informational and educational purposes only and should not replace comprehensive study
or professional advice. The included summary sections are meant to complement, not substitute, the detailed concepts
and chapters. Students are strongly advised to refer to the full chapters for complete understanding and conceptual
clarity.
By using this Reviewer, readers acknowledge and accept the inherent risks and limitations associated with educational
material and agree to take full responsibility for the outcomes of their decisions based on its content.
CA _______________________________
Visit Website
ABC Analysis
Ensure you thoroughly read all chapters without skipping any. The ABC analysis is
designed to help you prioritize based on past trends, but it should not replace
comprehensive preparation.
A
Certain Cashflows
3.2 Certainty Equivalent = Expected Risky Cashflows
Question 1
DISCUSS the advantages of Certainty Equivalent Method. (MTP 2 Marks, Mar’21)
Answer 1
advantages of Certainty Equivalent Method:
1. The certainty equivalent method is simple and easy to understand and apply.
2. It can easily be calculated for different risk levels applicable toF different cash flows. For example, if in a
particular year, a higher risk is associated with the cash flow, it can be easily adjusted and the NPV can be
recalculated accordingly.
Question 2
Adjustment of risk is required in capital budgeting decision, give reasons for it. (PYP 2 Marks Dec’21 & Nov’18)
Answer 2
Reasons for adjustment of Risk in Capital Budgeting decisions are as follows:
There is an opportunity cost involved while investing in a project for the level of risk. Adjustment of risk is
necessary to help make the decision as to whether the returns out of the project are proportionate with the
risks borne and whether it is worth investing in the project over the other investment options available.
Risk adjustment is required to know the real value of cash Inflows. Higher risk will lead to higher risk premium
and also the expectation of higher return.
Exam Insights: This question has an internal choice also in which examinees were asked for reasons of
adjustment of risk in Capital budgeting decision. Very few students attempted this question, and no
one answered satisfactorily.
EXPLAIN the concept of risk adjusted discount rate. (MTP 5 Marks, Oct’23, SM)
Answer 3
Risk Adjusted Discount Rate: The use of risk adjusted discount rate (RADR) is based on the concept that
investors demand higher returns from the risky projects. The required rate of return on any investment should
include compensation for delaying consumption plus compensation for inflation equal to risk free rate of return,
plus compensation for any kind of risk taken. If the risk associated with any investment project is higher than
risk involved in a similar kind of project, discount rate is adjusted upward in order to compensate this additional
risk borne.
A risk adjusted discount rate is a sum of risk-free rate and risk premium. The Risk Premium depends on the
perception of risk by the investor of a particular investment and risk aversion of the Investor.
So Risks adjusted discount rate = Risk free rate+ Risk premium
Risk Free Rate: It is the rate of return on Investments that bear no risk. For e.g., Government securities yield a
return of 6 % and bear no risk. In such case, 6 % is the risk -free rate.
Risk Premium: It is the rate of return over and above the risk-free rate, expected by the Investors as a reward
for bearing extra risk. For high-risk project, the risk premium will be high and for low risk projects, the risk
premium would be lower.
Question 4
A new project “Wiwitsu” requires an initial outlay of ₹ 4,50,000. The company uses certainty equivalent
method approach to evaluate the project. The risk-free rate is 7%. Following information is available:
Year Cash Flow After Tax (₹) Certainty Equivalent Coefficient
1 1,50,000 0.90
2 2,25,000 0.80
3 1,75,000 0.58
4 1,50,000 0.56
5 70,000 0.50
PV Factor at 7%
Year 1 2 3 4 5
PV Factor 0.935 0.873 0.816 0.763 0.713
Is investment in the project beneficial based on above information? (MTP 5 Marks Sep’23)
(Same concept different figures PYP 5 Marks Jan’21)
Answer 4
Calculation of Net Present Value of the Project
Year Cash Inflows After C.E. Adjusted Cash Present Value Present Value
Tax (in ₹) Inflows (in ₹) Factor (in ₹)
1 1,50,000 0.90 1,35,000 0.935 1,26,225
2 2,25,000 0.80 1,80,000 0.873 1,57,140
3 1,75,000 0.58 1,01,500 0.816 82,824
4 1,50,000 0.56 84,000 0.763 64,092
5 70,000 0.50 35,000 0.713 24,955
Total Present Value of Cash Inflows 4,55,236
Less: Initial Investment or Cash Outflow required for “Wiwitsu” (4,50,000)
Net Present Value 5,236
Conclusion: As the Net Present Value of the project after considering the Certainty Equivalent factors are still
positive; it may be advised to invest in project “Wiwitsu”
Determine the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value of the following projects:
A B C
Net cash outlays (₹) 70,000 1,20,000 2,20,000
Project life 5 years 5 years 5 years
Annual cash inflow (₹) 30,000 42,000 70,000
Coefficient of Variation 2.2 1.6 1.2
The company selects the risk-adjusted discount rate on the basis of the Coefficient of variation.
Coefficient of Variation Applicable Risk adjusted discount rate (i) PVIFA (i,5)
0 10% 3.791
0.4. 12% 3.605
0.8 14% 3.433
1.2 16% 3.274
1.6 18% 3.127
2 22% 2.864
>2.0 25% 2.689
Which project should be selected by the company based on Risk Adjusted NPV? (PYP 5 Marks Nov’22)
(Same concept different figures MTP 5 Marks, March’19, & New SM)
Answer 5
Selection of project on the basis of Risk Adjusted Net Present Value
Particulars A B C
Co efficient of Variation 2.2 1.6 1.2
Applicable discount rate (%) 25 18 16
Annual cash inflow (₹) 30,000 42,000 70,000
Relevant PVIFA 2.689 3.127 3.274
PV of cash inflow (₹) 80,670 1,31,334 2,29,180
Less: Cash outflow (₹) 70,000 1,20,000 2,20,000
Risk adjusted NPV (₹) 10,670 11,334 9,180
Conclusion: Project B should be selected as its Risk adjusted NPV is high.
Exam Insights: In this Numerical problem, by giving some details about three projects, examiners were
asked to select a project for investment, based on Risk Adjusted NPV of cash i nflows. Since it was a
direct question and similar problem has been solved in the study material, many attended it correctly
and scored full mark Hence, a good performance was perceived.
Question 6
K.P. Ltd. is investing Rs.50 lakhs in a project. The life of the project is 4 years. Risk free rate of return is 6% and
risk premium is 6%, other information is as under:
Sales of 1st year Rs.50 lakhs
Sales of 2nd year Rs.60 lakhs
Sales of 3rd year Rs.70 lakhs
Sales of 4th year Rs.80 lakhs
P/V Ratio (same in all the years) 50%
Fixed Cost (Excluding Depreciation) of 1st year Rs.10 lakhs
Fixed Cost (Excluding Depreciation) of 2nd year Rs.12 lakhs
Fixed Cost (Excluding Depreciation) of 3rd year Rs.14 lakhs
Fixed Cost (Excluding Depreciation) of 4th year Rs.16 lakhs
Ignoring interest and taxes,
You are required to calculate NPV of given project on the basis of Risk Adjusted Discount Rate.
Discount factor @ 6% and 12% are as under:
Answer 6
Calculation of Cash Flow
Year Sales P/V ratio Contribution Fixed Cost Cash Flows (Rs. in lakhs)
(Rs. in Lakhs) (A) (B) (Rs. in Lakhs) (Rs. in Lakhs) (E) = (C – D)
(C) = (A x B) (D)
1 50 50% 25 10 15
2 60 50% 30 12 18
3 70 50% 35 14 21
4 80 50% 40 16 24
When risk-free rate is 6% and the risk premium expected is 6%, then risk adjusted discount rate would be 6%
+ 6% =12%.
Calculation of NPV using Risk Adjusted Discount Rate (@ 12%)
Year Cash flows Discounting Factor @ 12% Present Value of Cash Flows
(Rs. in Lakhs) (Rs. in lakhs)
1 15 0.893 13.395
2 18 0.797 14.346
3 21 0.712 14.952
4 24 0.636 15.264
Total of present value of Cash flow 57.957
Less: Initial Investment 50.000
Net Present value (NPV) 7.957
Exam Insights: It was a numerical problem requiring calculation of NPV on the basis of Risk Adjusted
Discount Rate (RADR). Fair performance of the examinees was observed.
Question 7
JB Consultancy Group has determined relative utilities of cash flows of two forthcoming projects of its client
company as follows:
Cash Flow in ₹ -150000 -100000 -40000 150000 100000 50000 10000
Utilities -100 -60 -3 40 30 20 10
The distribution of cash flows of project X and Project Y are as follows:
Project X
Cash Flow (₹) -150000 - 100000 150000 100000 50000
Probability 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.10
Project Y
Cash Flow (₹) - 100000 -40000 150000 50000 100000
Probability 0.10 0.15 0.40 0.25 0.10
Which project should be selected and why?(RTP Nov’24)
Answer 7
Evaluation of project utilizes of Project X and Project Y
Project X
Cash flow (in ₹) Probability Utility Utility value
-1,50,000 0.10 -100 -10
-1,00,000 0.20 -60 -12
Question 8
XYZ Ltd. is considering taking up one of the two projects-Project-X and Project-Y. Both the projects having
same life require equal investment of ₹ 1600 lakhs each. Both are estimated to have almost the same yield. As
the company is new to this type of business, the cash flow arising from the projects cannot be estimated with
certainty. An attempt was therefore, made to use probability to analyse the pattern of cash flow from other
projects during the first year of operations. This pattern is likely to continue during the life of these projects.
The results of the analysis are as follows:
Project X
Cash Flow (in ₹ Lakh) Probability
220 0.10
260 0.20
300 0.40
340 0.20
380 0.10
Project Y
Cash Flow (in ₹ Lakh) Probability
180 0.10
260 0.25
340 0.30
420 0.25
500 0.10
Required:
Evaluate which of the two projects bears more risk for every percent of expected return.
(MTP 6 Marks Sep’24)
Answer 8
To determine which of the two projects bears more risk for every percent of expected return first we shall
calculate Variance and Standard Deviation of both the projects.
(i) Project X
Expected Net Cash Flow
= (0.10 x 220) + (0.20 x 260) + (0.40 x 300) + (0.20 x 340) + (0.10 x 380)
= 22 + 52 + 120 + 68 + 38 = 300
σ2 = 0.10 (220 – 300)2 + 0.20 (260 – 300)2 + 0.40 (300 – 300)2 + 0.20 (340 – 300)2 + 0.10 (380 – 300)2
= 640 + 320 + 0 + 320 + 640 = 1920
σ = √1920 = 43.82
Question 9
Viv Tsu Ltd. is considering one of two mutually exclusive proposals, Projects A and B, which require cash
outlays of Rs. 34,00,000 and Rs. 33,00,000 respectively. The certainty- equivalent (C.E) approach is used in
incorporating risk in capital budgeting decisions. The current yield on government bonds is 5% and this is used
as the risk-free rate. The expected net cash flows and their certainty equivalents are as follows:
Year-end Project A Project B
Cash Flow (Rs.) C.E. Cash Flow (Rs.) C.E.
1 16,75,000 0.8 16,75,000 0.9
2 15,00,000 0.7 15,00,000 0.8
3 15,00,000 0.5 15,00,000 0.7
4 20,00,000 0.4 10,00,000 0.8
5 21,20,000 0.6 9,00,000 0.9
PV factor at 5% are as follows:
Year 1 2 3 4 5
PV factor 0.952 0.907 0.864 0.823 0.784
DETERMINE which project should be accepted. (MTP 8 Marks Mar’21)
(Same concept different figures RTP Nov’20)
Answer 9
Statement Showing the Net Present Value of Project A
Year end Cash Flow (Rs.) C.E. Adjusted Cash flow (Rs.) Present value Total Present value
(a) (b) (c) = (a) × (b) factor at 5% (d) (Rs.) (e) = (c) × (d)
1 16,75,000 0.8 13,40,000 0.952 12,75,680
2 15,00,000 0.7 10,50,000 0.907 9,52,350
3 15,00,000 0.5 7,50,000 0.864 6,48,000
4 20,00,000 0.4 8,00,000 0.823 6,58,400
5 21,20,000 0.6 12,72,000 0.784 9,97,248
PV of total Cash Inflows 45,31,678
Less: Initial Investment 34,00,000
Net Present Value 11,31,678
Question 10
An enterprise is investing ₹ 100 lakhs in a project. The risk-free rate of return is 7%. Risk premium expected by
the Management is 7%. The life of the project is 5 years. Following are the cash flows that are estimated over
the life of the project.
Year Cash flows (₹ in lakhs)
1 25
2 60
3 75
4 80
5 65
CALCULATE Net Present Value of the project based on Risk free rate and also on the basis of Risks adjusted
discount rate. (MTP 5 Marks Apr’22 & Aug’18, RTP May’19, Nov’19 & Nov’23, SM)
Answer 10
The Present Value of the Cash Flows for all the years by discounting the cash flow at 7% is calculated as below:
Year Cash flows Discounting Factor Present value of Cash Flows
(₹ in lakhs) @7% (₹ in Lakhs)
1 25 0.935 23.38
2 60 0.873 52.38
3 75 0.816 61.20
4 80 0.763 61.04
5 65 0.713 46.35
Total of present value of Cash flow 244.34
Less: Initial investment 100
Net Present Value (NPV) 144.34
Now, when the risk-free rate is 7 % and the risk premium expected by the Management is 7 %.
So, the risk adjusted discount rate is 7 % + 7 % =14%.
Discounting the above cash flows using the Risk Adjusted Discount Rate would be as below:
Year Cash flows Discounting Factor Present Value of Cash Flows
(₹ in Lakhs) @14% (₹ in lakhs)
1 25 0.877 21.93
2 60 0.769 46.14
3 75 0.675 50.63
4 80 0.592 47.36
5 65 0.519 33.74
Total of present value of Cash flow 199.80
Initial investment 100
Net present value (NPV) 99.80
Answer 11
(i) Statement Showing the Net Present Value of Project M
Year Cash Flow (₹) C.E. Adjusted Cash flow (₹) Present value Total Present
end (a) (b) (c) = (a) × (b) factor at 6% (d) value (₹)
(e) = (c) × (d)
1 9,00,000 0.8 7,20,000 0.943 6,78,960
2 10,00,000 0.7 7,00,000 0.890 6,23,000
3 10,00,000 0.5 5,00,000 0.840 4,20,000
17,21,960
Less: Initial Investment 17,00,000
Net Present Value 21,960
Question 12
A firm can make investment in either of the following two projects. The firm anticipates its cost of capital to
be 10%. The pre-tax cash flows of the projects for five years are as follows:
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
Project A (₹) (2,00,000) 35,000 80,000 90,000 75,000 20,000
Project 8 (₹) (2,00,000) 2,18,000 10,000 10,000 4,000 3,000
Ignore Taxation.
An amount of ₹ 35,000 will be spent on account of sales promotion in year 3 in case of Project A. This has not
been taken into account in calculation of pre-tax cash flows.
Answer 12
Calculation of Present value of cash flows
Year PV factor Project A Project B
@ 10% Cash flows (₹) Discounted Cash flows (₹) Discounted
Cash flows Cash flows
0 1.00 (2,00,000) (2,00,000) (2,00,000) (2,00,000)
1 0.91 35,000 31,850 2,18,000 1,98,380
2 0.83 80,000 66,400 10,000 8,300
3 0.75 55,000 (90,000 -35,000) 41,250 10,000 7,500
4 0.68 75,000 51,000 4,000 2,720
5 0.62 20,000 12,400 3,000 1,860
Net Present Value 2,900 18,760
Project-B: The cash inflow in year-1 is ₹ 2,18,000 and the amount required to equate the cash outflow is
₹ 2,00,000, which can be recovered in a period less than a year. Hence, Payback period will be calculated as
Rs.2,00,000
below: = 0.917 years or 11 months
RS. 2,18,00,000
Project-B: The cash inflow in year-1 is ₹1,98,380 and remaining amount required to equate the cash outflow is ₹
1,620 i.e. (₹ 2,00,000 – ₹ 1,98,380) which will be recovered from year-2 cash inflow. Hence, Payback period will
be calculated as below
𝑅𝑠.1620
1 year+ = 1.195 years Or 1 Year 2.34 months Or 1 Year 2 months and 10 days.
𝑅𝑆.8300
₹ 2,02,900
Project A = = 1.01
2,00,000
₹ 2,18,760
Project B = = 1.09
2,00,000
Question 13 LDR
Answer 13
(I) Calculation of Expected Net Cash Flow (ENCF) of Project A and Project B
Project A Project B
Net Cash Flow (₹) Probability Expected Net Net Cash Probability Expected Net
Cash Flow (₹) Flow (₹) Cash Flow (₹)
1,72,000 0.30 51,600 3,38,000 0.20 67,600
1,82,000 0.30 54,600 3,18,000 0.30 95,400
1,92,000 0.40 76,800 2,98,000 0.50 1,49,000
ENCF 1,83,000 3,12,000
Project A
Standard Deviation (σ) = √Variance (σ2 )= √6,90,00,000 = 8,306.624
Project B
Standard Deviation (σ) =√Variance (σ2 )= √24,40,00,000= 15,620.499
𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐚 𝟏𝟐
Forward Premium (Annualized): 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐭 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐞
× 𝐆𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎
8. Re/$ = 85.10/85.20
Bid Ask
Bid is Always lesser than ask.
9. Nostro, Vostro and Loro:
- Nostro: Our account with you. Vostro: Your account with us. Loro: Their account with you.
All dealings in Foreign Exchange effect the Exchange Position whether delivery has taken place or not, but
Cash Position is affected only when actual delivery has taken place. Explain. (MTP 4 Marks, Nov’21)
Answer 1
Yes, this statement is correct because while Exchange Position is referred to total of purchases or sale of
commitment of a bank to purchase or sale foreign exchange whether actual delivery has taken place or not. In
other words, all transactions for which bank has agreed with counter party are entered into exchange position
on the date of the contract.
While Cash Position is outstanding balance (debit or credit) in bank’s Nostro account. Since all foreign
exchange dealings of bank are routed through Nostro account it is credited for all purchases and debited for
sale by bank.
Therefore, all transactions effecting Cash position will affect Exchange Position not vice versa.
Question 2
“Netting helps in minimizing the total value of intercompany fund flows”. EXPLAIN.
(MTP 4 Marks, Apr’22, Mar’22)
Answer 2
Yes, to some extent the given statement is correct as it is a technique of optimizing cash flow movements
with the combined efforts of the subsidiaries thereby reducing administrative and transaction costs
resulting from currency conversion. There is a coordinated international interchange of materials, finished
products and parts among the different units of MNC with many subsidiaries buying /selling from/to each
other.
Advantages derived from netting system includes:
1) Reduces the number of cross-border transactions between subsidiaries thereby decreasing the overall
administrative costs of such cash transfers
2) Reduces the need for foreign exchange conversion and hence decreases transaction costs associated
with foreign exchange conversion.
3) Improves cash flow forecasting since net cash transfers are made at the end of each period
4) Gives an accurate report and settles accounts through coordinated efforts among all subsidiaries.
Question 3
What are the parameters to identify currency risk? List out the ways to minimize such risk.
(MTP 4 Marks, Apr’24) (RTP Nov’19)
Answer 3
Some of the parameters to identity the currency risk are as follows:
(i) Government Action: The Government action of any country has visual impact in its currency. For
example, the UK Govt. decision to divorce from European Union i.e. Brexit brought the pound to its
lowest since 1980’s.
(ii) Nominal Interest Rate: As per interest rate parity (IRP) the currency exchange rate depends on the
nominal interest of that country.
(iii) Inflation Rate: Purchasing power parity theory discussed in later chapters impact the value of currency.
(iv) Natural Calamities: Any natural calamity can have negative impact.
(v) War, Coup, Rebellion etc.: All these actions can have far reaching impact on currency’s exchange rates.
(vi) Change of Government: The change of government and its attitude towards foreign investment also
helps to identify the currency risk.
Ways to minimize such risk are:-
(1) Money Market Hedging.
Question 4
Briefly explain Asset and Liability Management (ALM). (PYP 4 Marks, Nov’22)
Answer 4
Asset-Liability Management (ALM) is one of the important tools of risk management in commercial banks of
India. Indian banking industry is exposed to a number of risks prevailing in the market such as market risk,
financial risk, interest rate risk etc. The net income of the banks is very sensitive to these factors or risks.
ALM is a comprehensive and dynamic framework for measuring, monitoring and managing the market risk
of a bank. It is the management of structure of Balance Sheet (liabilities and assets) in such a way that the
net earnings from interest are maximized within the overall risk preference (present and future) of the
institutions. The ALM functions extend to liquidly risk management, management of market risk, trading risk
management, funding and capital planning and profit planning and growth projection.
Banks and other financial institutions provide services which expose them to various kinds of risks like credit
risk, interest risk, and liquidity risk. Asset liability management is an approach that provides institutions with
protection that makes such risk acceptable. Asset-liability management models enable institutions to
measure and monitor risk, and provide suitable strategies for their management.
It is therefore appropriate for institutions (banks, finance companies, leasing companies, insurance
companies, and others) to focus on asset-liability management when they face financial risks of different
types. Asset-liability management includes not only a formalization of this understanding, but also a way to
quantify and manage these risks.
In a sense, the various aspects of balance sheet management deal with planning as well as direction and
control of the levels, changes and mixes of assets, liabilities, and capital.
Exam Insights: Poor performance has been observed in this theoretical question on Interest Rate Risk
Management as most of examinees could not understand the question and written irrelevant points in
their answers.
Question 5
Answer 5
At its simplest, a money market hedge is an agreement to exchange a certain amount of one currency for a
fixed amount of another currency, at a particular date. For example, suppose a business owner in India
expects to receive 1 million USD in six months. This Owner could create an agreement now (today) to
exchange 1Million USD for INR at roughly the current exchange rate. Thus, if the USD dropped in value by
the time the business owner got the payment, he would still be able to exchange the payment for the original
quantity of U.S. dollars specified.
Advantages of Money Market Hedging
(i) Fixes the future rate, thus eliminating downside risk exposure.
(ii) Flexibility with regard to the amount to be covered.
(iii) Money market hedges may be feasible as a way of hedging for currencies where forward contracts are
not available.
Disadvantages of Money Market Hedging
(i) More complicated to organize than a forward contract.
(ii) Fixes the future rate - no opportunity to benefit from favorable movements in exchange rates.
Exam Insights: Average performance has been noticed in this theoretical question on Foreign Exchange
Exposure and Risk Management.
The SWIFT plays an important role in Foreign Exchange dealings. Explain. (MTP 4 Marks Sep’24)
Answer 6
The SWIFT plays an important role in Foreign Exchange dealings because of the following reasons:
• In addition to validation statements and documentation it is a form of quick settlement as messaging
takes place within seconds.
• Because of security and reliability helps to reduce Operational Risk.
• Since it enables its customers to standardize transaction it brings operational efficiencies and
reduced costs.
• It also ensures full backup and recovery system.
• Acts as a catalyst that brings financial agencies to work together in a collaborative manner for mutual
interest.
Question 7
WAVELENGTH Ltd. an Indian firm needs to pay JAPANESE YEN (JY) 1 crore on 30th June. In order to hedge the
risk involved in foreign currency transaction, the firm is considering two alternative methods i.e. forward
market cover and currency option contract.
On 1st April, following quotations (JY/INR) are made available:
Spot 3 months forward
1.7825/1.8245. 1.8726./1.8923
The prices for forex currency option on purchase are as follows:
Strike Price JY 1.8855
Call option (June) JY 0.047
Put option (June) JY 0.098
For excess or balance of JY covered, the firm would use forward rate as future spot rate. You are required to
recommend cheaper hedging alternative for WAVELENGTH LTD.
Note: Except rates round off other calculations to nearest rupees. (MTP 6 Marks, Mar’24 , 8 Marks Nov’21)
(SM)
Answer 7
(i) Forward Cover
1
3-month Forward Rate = 1.8726 = ₹ 0.5340/JY
Accordingly, INR required for JY 1,00,00,000 (1,00,00,000 X ₹ 0.5340) = ₹ 53,40,000
(ii) Option Cover
To purchase JY 1,00,00,000, WAVELENGTH LTD shall enter into a Put Option @ JY 1.8855/INR
₹
JY1,00,00,000 53,03,633
Accordingly, outflow in INR ( 1.8855 )
INR 5303633×0.098
Premium ( ) 2,91,588
1.7825
55,95,221
Since outflow of cash is least in case of Forward Cover, same should be opted for.
Question 8
Mr. Mammen, an Indian investor invests in a listed bond in USA. If the price of the bond at the beginning of
the year is USD 100 and it is USD 103 at the end of the year. The coupon rate is 3% payable annually.
CALCULATE the return on investment in terms of home country currency if:
Chapter 10: Foreign Exchange Exposure & Risk Management 10 - 4
(i) USD is Flat.
(ii) USD appreciates during the year by 3%.
(iii) USD depreciates during the year by 3%.
(iv) Indian Rupee appreciates during the year by 5%. (MTP 6 Marks, Oct’22, RTP May ’22)
Answer 8
(i) If USD is flat
(Price at end − Price at begining)+Interest (103 − 100) + 3
Return = = = 3 +3/100 = 0.06 say 6%
Price at beginning 100
Question 9
An Indian company needs $ funds for six months and it obtains the following quotes (Rs./$)
Spot: 35.90/36.10
3 - Months forward rate: 36.00/36.25
6 - Months forward rate: 36.10/36.40
$ or Rs. Interest rates:
3 - Months interest rate: Rs.: 12%, $: 6%
6 - Months interest rate: Rs.: 11.50%, $: 5.5%
(i) Advise whether the company should borrow in INR or USD.
(ii) Evaluate the rate of interest after 3 - months to make the company indifferent between 3 - months
borrowing and 6 - months borrowing in the case of:
(i) Rupee borrowing
(ii) Dollar borrowing
Note: For the purpose of calculation, please take the units of dollar and rupee as 100 each.
(MTP 8 Marks, Mar’21, PYP 8 Marks Nov’18)
Answer 9
(i) If company borrows in $ then outflow would be as follows:
Let company borrows $ 100 $ 100.00
Add: Interest for 6 months @ 5.5% $ 2.75
Amount Repayable after 6 months $ 102.75
Applicable 6-month forward rate 36.40
Amount of Cash outflow in Indian Rupees Rs. 3,740.10
If company borrows equivalent amount in Indian Rupee, then outflow would be as follows:
Equivalent Rs. amount Rs. 36.10 x 100 ₹3,610.00
Add: Interest @11.50% ₹207.58
₹3817.58
Since cash outflow is more in Rs. borrowing then borrowing should be made in $.
(ii) (a) Let ‘ir ’ be the interest rate of Rs. borrowing make indifferent between 3 months borrowings and 6
months borrowing then
(1 + 0.03) (1 + ir ) = (1 + 0.0575)
ir = 2.67% or 10.68% (on annualized basis)
(a) Let ‘id’ be the interest rate of $ borrowing after 3 months to make indifference between 3 months
borrowings and 6 months borrowings. Then,
(1 + 0.015) (1 + id ) = (1 + 0.0275)
id = 1.232% or 4.93% (on annualized basis)
A bank enters into a forward purchase TT covering an export bill for Swiss Francs 1,00,000 at ₹ 32.4000 due
25th April and covered itself for same delivery in the local inter bank market at ₹ 32.4200. However, on 25th
March, exporter sought for cancellation of the contract as the tenor of the bill is changed.
In Singapore market, Swiss Francs were quoted against dollars as under:
Spot USD 1 = Sw. Fcs. 1.5076/1.5120
One month forward 1.5150/ 1.5160
Two months forward 1.5250 / 1.5270
Three months forward 1.5415/ 1.5445
and in the interbank market US dollars were quoted as under:
Spot USD 1 = ₹ 49.4302/4455
Spot / April 4100/4200
Spot/May 4300/4400
Spot/June 4500/4600
Calculate the cancellation charges, payable by the customer if exchange margin required by the bank is
0.10% on buying and selling. (MTP 6 Marks, Oct’23, SM)
Answer 10
First the contract will be cancelled at TT Selling Rate
USD/ Rupee Spot Selling Rate ₹ 49.4455
Add: Premium for April ₹ 0.4200
₹ 49.8655
Add: Exchange Margin @ 0.10% ₹ 0.04987
₹ 49.91537 Or 49.9154
USD/ Sw. Fcs One Month Buying Rate Sw. Fcs. 1.5150
Sw. Fcs. Spot Selling Rate (₹49.91537/1.5150) ₹ 32.9474
Rounded Off ₹ 32.9475
Bank buys Sw. Fcs. Under original contract ₹ 32.4000
Bank Sells under Cancellation ₹ 32.9475
Difference payable by customer ₹ 00.5475
Exchange difference of Sw. Fcs. 1,00,000 payables by customer ₹ 54,750 (Sw. Fcs. 1,00,000 x ₹ 0.5475)
Question 11
On January 28, 2023, an importer customer requested a Bank to remit Singapore Dollar (SGD) 2,500,000
under an irrevocable Letter of Credit (LC). However, due to unavoidable factors, the Bank could affect the
remittances only on February 4, 2023. The inter-bank market rates were as follows:
January 28, 2023 February 4, 2023
US$ 1 = ₹ 80.91/80.97 ₹ 80.85/80.90
GBP £ 1 = US$ 1.7765/1.7775 US$ 1.7840/1.7850
GBP £ 1 = SGD 2. 1380/2.1390 SGD 2.1575/2.1590
The Bank wishes to retain an exchange margin of 0.125% on ₹/ SGD.
Required:
Estimate how much does the customer stand to gain or lose due to the delay?
(Note: Calculate the rate in multiples of 0.0001) (MTP 6 Marks, Apr’24) (RTP Nov’18, SM)
Answer 11
On January 28, 2023, the importer customer requested to remit SGD 25 lakhs.
To consider sell rate for the bank:
US $ = ₹ 80.97
Pound 1 US$ 1.7775
Pound 1 = SGD 3.1380
SGD 1 = ₹ 67.3172
Add: Exchange margin (0.125%) = ₹ 0.0841
= ₹ 67.4013
On February 4, 2023 the rates are
US $ = ₹ 80.90
Pound 1 = US$ 1.7850
Pound 1 = SGD 2.1575
Therefore, SGD 1 Rs.80.90∗ 1.7850
= SGD 2.1575
SGD 1 = ₹ 66.9323
Add: Exchange margin (0.125%) = ₹ 0.0837
= ₹ 67.0160
Hence, Gain to the importer
= SGD 25,00,000 (₹ 67.4013 – ₹ 67.0160) = ₹ 9,63,250
Question 12
A UK based exporter exported goods to USA. The Invoice amount is $ 7,00,000 and credit period is 3
months. Exchange rates in London areas follows: -
Spot Rate ($/£) 1.5865 – 1.5905
3-month Forward Rate ($/£) 1.6100 – 1.6140
Rates of interest in Money Market:
Deposit Loan
$ 7% 9%
£ 5% 8%
Justify your stand to choose money market hedge (including steps) instead of Forward Contract.
Note: Make calculation up to 2 decimal points. (RTP May’24) (RTP May ’19 SM)
Answer 12
Amount expected to be received under Money Market Hedge.
Identify: Foreign currency is an asset. Amount $ 7,00,000.
Create: $ Liability.
Borrow: In $. The borrowing rate is 9% per annum or 2.25% per quarter.
Amount to be borrowed: 7,00,000 / 1.0225 = $ 6,84,596.58
Convert: Sell $ and buy £. The relevant rate is the Ask rate, namely,1.5905 per £,
(Note: This is an indirect quote).
Amount of £s received on conversion is 4,30,428.53 (6,84,596.58 /1.5905).
Invest: £ 4,30,428.53 will be invested at 5% for 3 months and get £ 4,35,808.89
Settle: The liability of $ 6,84,596.58 at interest of 2.25 per cent quartermatures to $7,00,000 receivable
from customer.
Using forward rate, amount receivable is = 7,00,000 / 1.6140 = £ 4,33,705.08
Amount received through money market hedge = £ 4,35,808.89
Gain = £ 4,35,808.89– £ 4,33,705.08= £ 2103.81
Justification: By following the prescribed steps under hedging we found the exporter receives £ 4,33,705.08
by using forward cover whilehe receives £ 4,35,808.89 through money market hedge. Thus, money market
hedge helps exporter to receive £ 2103.81 more than the amount received using Forward contract. Hence it is
more beneficial.
Question 13
Mr. Vivit Su as Treasurer for your bank working under you sold HK$ 10 million value Spot to your customer
at ₹ 10.53/ HK$ and covered yourself in the London market on the same day when the exchange rates
Answer 13
(i) Rupee – Dollar Selling Rate = ₹ 82.85
Dollar – Hong Kong Dollar Buying Rate: = H.K.$ 7.8880
Hong Kong Dollar (Selling) Cross Rate: = ₹ 82.85 / 7.8880
= ₹ 10.5033
(ii) Profit / Loss to the Bank
Amount received from customer
(HK$ 10 million × 10.55) ₹ 10,55,00,000
Amount paid on cover deal
(HK$ 10 million × ₹10.5033) ₹ 10,50,33,000
Profit to Bank ₹4,67,000
To some extent, we agree with views of Internal Auditor as the gain on the same transaction is bit lesser
keeping in view the amount involved.
Question 14
Followings are the spot exchange rates quoted at three different forexmarkets:
USD/INR 48.30 in Mumbai
GBP/INR 77.52 in London
GBP/USD 1.6231 in New York
The arbitrageur has USD1,00,00,000. Assuming that there are no transaction costs, explain whether there is
any arbitrage gain possible from the quoted spot exchange rates. (MTP 4 Marks Oct’24)
Answer 14
The arbitrageur can proceed as stated below to realize arbitrage gains.
(i) Buy ₹ from USD 10,000,000 At Mumbai 48.30 × 10,000,000
₹ 483,000,000
₹483000000
(ii) Convert these ₹ to GBP at London ( ₹77.52 )
(iii) Convert GBP to USD at New York GBP 6,230,650.155 × 1.6231USD 10,112,968.26
There is net gain of USD 10,112968.26 less USD 10,000,000 i.e.USD 112,968.26
Question 15
WEPL Ltd. has made purchases worth USD 80,000 on 1st May 2020 for which it has to make a payment on 1st
November 2020. The present exchange rate is INR/USD 75. The company can purchase forward dollars at
INR/USD 74. The company will have to make an upfront premium @ 1 per cent of the forward amount
purchased. The cost of funds to WEPL Ltd. is 10 per cent per annum.
The company can hedge its position with the following expected rate of USD in foreign exchange market on
1st May 2020:
Exchange Rate Probability
(i) INR/USD 77 0.15
(ii) INR/USD 71 0.25
(iii) INR/USD 79 0.20
(iv) INR/USD 74 0.40
You are required to advise the company for a suitable cover for risk.
(MTP 8 Marks, Mar’23, PYP 8 Marks Nov ’20) (Same concepts different figures RTP Nov’24)
Question 16
Answer 16
(i) Swap Points for 2 months and 15 days
Bid Ask
Swap Points for 2 months (a) 70 90
Swap Points for 3 months (b) 160 186
Swap Points for 30 days (c) = (b) – (a) 90 96
Swap Points for 15 days (d) = (c)/2 45 48
Swap Points for 2 months & 15 days (e) = (a) + (d) 115 138
(ii) Foreign Exchange Rates for 20th June 2016
Bid Ask
Spot Rate (a) 66.2525 67.5945
Swap Points for 2 months & 15 days (b) 0.0115 0.0138
66.2640 67.6083
(iii) Annual Rate of Premium
Bid Ask
Spot Rate (a) 66.2525 67.5945
Foreign Exchange Rates for 20th June 2016 (b) 66.2640 67.6083
Premium (c) 0.0115 0.0138
Total (d) = (a) + (b) 132.5165 135.2028
Average (d) / 2 66.2583 67.6014
Premium 0.0115 12 0.0138 12
× 2.5 × 100 67.6014
× 2.5 × 100
66.2583
= 0.0833% = 0.0980%
Shanti exported 200 pieces of a designer jewellery to USA at $ 200 each. To manufacture and design this
jewellery she imported raw material from Japan of the cost of JP¥ 6000 for each piece.
The labour cost and variable overhead incurred in producing each piece of jewellery are ₹ 1,300 and ₹ 650
respectively.
Suppose Spot Rates are:
₹/ US$ ₹ 65.00 – ₹ 66.00
JP¥/ US$ JP¥ 115 – JP¥ 120
Shanti is expecting that by the time the export remittance is received and payment of import is made the
expected Spot Rates are likely to be as follows:
₹/ US$ ₹ 68.90 – ₹ 69.25
JP¥/ US$ JP¥ 105 – JP¥ 112
You are required to calculate the resultant transaction exposure. (MTP 6 Marks, Oct’21)
Answer 17
Profit as per Spot Rates
₹
Sales Revenue (US$ 200 X 200 X ₹ 65) 26,00,000
Less: Cost of Imported Raw Material (200 X 6000/115 X ₹ 66) 6,88,696
Labour Cost (200 X ₹ 1,300) 2,60,000
Variable Overheads (200 X ₹ 650) 1,30,000
Profit 15,21,304
Question 18
WAVELENGTH has taken a six-month loan from its foreign collaborator for USD 2 million. Interest is payable
on maturity @ LIBOR plus 1%. The following information is available:
Spot Rate INR/USD 68.5275
6 months Forward rate INR/USD 68.4575
6 months LIBOR for USD 2%
6 months LIBOR for INR 6%
You are required to:
(i) Calculate Rupee requirements if forward cover is taken.
(ii) Advise the company on the forward cover.
What will be your opinion if spot rate of INR/USD is 68.4275 (RTP May’23)
Answer 18
Rupee requirement if forward cover is taken:
6 Month Forward rate 68.4575
6 US$ 30,000
Interest amount (20,00,000 x 3%* x )
12
CS 1 (RTP May’24)
(Chapter 7- Securitization)
Grow More Ltd. an NBFC is in the need of funds and hence it sold its receivables to MAC Financial Corporation
(MFC) for ₹ 100 million. MFC created a trust for this purpose called General Investment Trust (GIT) through
which it issued securities carrying a different level of risk and return to the investors. Further, this structure
also permits the GIT to reinvest surplus funds for short term as per their requirement.
MFC also appointed a third party, Safeguard Pvt. Ltd. (SPL) to collect the payment due from obligor(s) and
passes it to GIT. It will also follow up with defaulting obligor and if required initiate appropriate legal action
against them.
1. The securitized instrument issued for ₹ 100 million by the GIT falls under category of ……….
(a) Pass Through certificate (PTCs)
(b) Pay Through Security (PTS)
(c) Stripped Security
(d) Debt Fund.
Ans:(b)
CS 2 (RTP May’24)
1. Test 1 is …………………
(a) Serial Correlation test
(b) Filter Rules test
(c) Run test
(d) Variance Ratio test
Ans:(a)
2. Test 2 is ………………….
(a) Serial Correlation test
(b) Filter Rules test
3. Test 3 is ………………
(a) Serial Correlation test
(b) Filter Rules test
(c) Run test
(d) Variance Ratio test.
Ans:(b)
4. The Filter Rule Test should not be applied for buy and hold strategy if…………….
(a) the behavior of stock price changes is predictable.
(b) the behavior of stock price changes is dependent on pasttrends.
(c) the behavior of stock price changes is correlated.
(d) the behavior of stock price changes is random.
Ans:(d)
On the basis of above information, choose the most appropriate answer to the following questions:
You, being an expert of the matter, are required to answer his questions. Select the most appropriate
alternative:
4. If he wants a yield of 15% the maximum price he should be ready to pay for is…………….
(a) 217.41
(b) 224.81
(c) 240.00
On the basis of above information, choose the most appropriate answer to the MCQs.
1. The main factor to be considered in selecting fixed income avenue for client A shall be………………..
(a) Yield to maturity
(b) Risk of Default
(c) Tax Shield
(d) Liquidity
Ans: (b)
2. The main factor that have to be evaluated in the selection of Bond for Client B shall be………………..
(a) Yield to maturity
(b) Risk of Default
(c) Tax Shield
(d) Liquidity
Ans: (a)
3. If Weak form efficiency is prevailing in the market then which approach is best for selection of Equity
Shares?
(a) Technical Analysis
(b) Fundamental Analysis
(c) Random selection Analysis
(d) None of the above.
Ans: (b)
On the basis of above information, choose the most appropriate answer to the following questions:
4. If AES Ltd. PE multiple remains unchanged then its expected market price per share after the acquisition
would be………………
(a) ₹ 14
(b) ₹ 30
(c) ₹ 31.30
(d) ₹ 40.00
Ans: (c)
1. The weighted average cost of capital of Alpha Ltd. shall approximately be ……………….
(a) 13.520%
(b) 15.225%
(c) 17.950%
CA Final
May / November 2025
Publisher:
Ensure you thoroughly read all chapters without skipping any. The ABC analysis is
designed to help you prioritize based on past trends, but it should not replace
comprehensive preparation.
ABBREVIATIONS : -
TCWG= Those Charged with Governance FS= Financial Statements
Chapter 1.1: SQC 1: Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audit and Reviews of Historical
Financial Information, and other Assurance and Related Services Engagements
Question 1
J.A.C.K. & Co., a Chartered Accountant firm was appointed as the statutory auditor of Falcon Ltd. after
ensuring the compliance with relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. Mr. Jay was the engagement
partner for the aforesaid audit and prior to commencement of the audit, Mr. Jay had called for a meeting
of the engagement team in order to direct them and assign them their responsibilities. At the end of
meeting, Mr. Jay assigned review responsibilities to two of the engagement team members who were the
most experienced amongst all, for reviewing the work performed by the less experienced team members.
While reviewing the work performed by the less experienced members of the engagement team, what shall
be the considerations of the reviewers? (MTP 5 Marks, Mar’21)
Answer 1
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, review responsibilities are determined on the basis
that more experienced team members, including the engagement partner, review work performed by less
experienced team members.
In the given situation, Mr. Jay, engagement partner assigned review responsibilities to two of the engagement
team members who were the most experienced team members.
While reviewing the work performed by less experienced members of the engagement team, both the more
experienced Reviewers should consider whether:
(i) The work has been performed in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements.
(ii) Significant matters have been raised for further consideration.
(iii) Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been documented and
implemented.
(iv) There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed.
(v) The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented.
(vi) The evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the report; and
(vii) The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
Question 2
Answer 2
As per SQC 1 engagement quality control reviewer can be a partner, other person in the firm (member of ICAI),
suitably qualified external person, or a team made up of such individuals, with sufficient and appropriate
experience and authority to objectively evaluate, before the report is issued, the significant judgments the
engagement team made and the conclusions they reached in formulating the report.
It also states that the engagement quality control reviewer for an audit of the financial statements of a listed
entity is an individual with sufficient and appropriate experience and authority to act as an audit engagement
partner on audits of financial statements of listed entities.
In addition, the work of EQCR involves objective evaluation of the significant judgments made by the
engagement team and ensuring that the conclusions reached by the team in formulating audit report are
appropriate. It is necessary for EQCR to have the requisite technical expertise and experience to enable her
Question 3
JJJ & Associates, an audit firm working mainly in field of statutory audits, has been selected by Quality
Review Board (QRB) for review. During review, it has been found that Audit Firm Under Review (AFUR) has
not maintained quality of audits of selected companies as evidenced from their respective audit files. AFUR
has not complied with requirements of SA 501 and SA 505 in these cases. Further, in these cases, companies
had not complied with accounting standards as required by law and AFUR has issued clean audit reports.
Dwell upon functions of QRB in this regard. (MTP 5 Marks Oct’23)
Answer 3
Central Government has constituted a Quality Review Board as an independent body under the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949 to review the quality of services provided by the Chartered Accountants in India
including audit services.
Accordingly, u/s 28B of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the Board shall perform the following
functions, namely: -
(a) to make recommendations to the Council with regard to the quality of services provided by the
members of the Institute
(b) to review the quality of services provided by the members of the Institute including audit services
(c) to guide the members of the Institute to improve the quality of services and adherence to the various
statutory and other regulatory requirements and
(d) to forward cases of non-compliance with various statutory and regulatory requirements by the
members of the Institute or firms, noticed by it during the course of its reviews, to the Disciplinary
Directorate for its examination.
In the given situation, AUFR has not performed audits of selected companies qualitatively and has failed
to perform audits in accordance with Standards on Auditing, Further, it has issued clean reports despite
non-adherence to accounting standards by respective companies. Therefore, QRB is empowered to act
on the lines mentioned above in respect of AUFR.
Question 4 LDR
M/s Chandra & Co., Chartered Accountants were appointed as Statutory Auditors of Green Essence Limited
for the F.Y 2021-2022. The previous year's audit was conducted by M/s. Nath & Associates. After the audit
was completed and report submitted, it was found that closing balances of last financial year i.e., 2020-21
were incorrectly brought forward. It was found that M/s Chandra & Co. did not apply any audit procedures
to ensure that correct opening balances have been brought forward to the current period. A ccordingly, a
complaint was filed against Chandra & Co. in relation to this matter. You are required to inform what policies
Answer 4
In the given question, Chandra & Co. did not apply audit procedures to ensure that opening balances had been
correctly brought forward. A complaint was filed against the auditors in this context. As per Standard on Quality
Control (SQC) 1 “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”,
(i) The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that it
deals appropriately with:
(a) Complaints and allegations that the work performed by the firm fails to comply with professional
standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and
(b) Allegations of non-compliance with the firm’s system of quality control.
(ii) Complaints and allegations (which do not include those that are clearly frivolous) may originate from within
or outside the firm. They may be made by firm personnel, clients or other third parties. They may be received
by engagement team members or other firm personnel.
(iii) As part of this process, the firm establishes clearly defined channels for firm personnel to raise any concerns
in a manner that enables them to come forward without fear of reprisals.
(iv) The firm investigates such complaints and allegations in accordance with established policies and procedures.
The investigation is supervised by a partner with sufficient and appropriate experience and authority within
the firm but who is not otherwise involved in the engagement, and includes involving legal counsel as
necessary. Small firms and sole practitioners may use the services of a suitably qualified external person or
another firm to carry out the investigation. Complaints, allegations and the responses to them are
documented.
(v) Where the results of the investigations indicate deficiencies in the design or operation of the firm’s quality
control policies and procedures, or non-compliance with the firm’s system of quality control by an individual
or individuals, the firm takes appropriate action.
Question 5
HK & Co. Chartered Accountants have been auditors of SAT Ltd (a listed entity) for the last 8 financial years.
CA. H, partner of the firm, has been handling the audit assignment very well since the appointment. The
audit work of CA. H and her team is reviewed by a senior partner CA. K to assure that audit is performed in
accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements. CA. K was out of India for
some personal reasons, so this year CA. G has been asked to review the audit work. In your opinion, what
areas CA. G should consider at the time of review. List any four areas and also comment whether firm is
complying with Standard on Quality Control or not. (PYP 5 Marks July 21)
Answer 5
Compliance with Standard on Quality Control on review of audit work -
As per SQC 1, an engagement quality control review for audits of financial statements of listed entities includes
considering the following:
(i) The work has been performed in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements;
(ii) Significant matters have been raised for further consideration;
(iii) Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been documented and
implemented;
(iv) There is a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed;
(v) The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented;
(vi) The evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the report; and
(vii) The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
The firm should establish policies and procedures:
(i) Setting out criteria for determining the need for safeguards to reduce the familiarity threat to an
acceptable level when using the same senior personnel on an assurance engagement over a long period
of time; and
Chapter 1.1 SQC 1 – Quality Control of Firms 1.1 - 4
(ii) For all audits of financial statements of listed entities, requiring the rotation of the engagement partner
after a specified period in compliance with the Code.
The familiarity threat is particularly relevant in the context of financial statement audits of listed entities. For
these audits, the engagement partner should be rotated after a pre- defined period, normally not more than
seven years.
From the facts given in the question and from the above stated paras of SQC 1, it can be concluded that firm
is not complying with SQC 1 as Engagement Partner H is continuing for more than 7 years.
Exam Insights: Most of the examinees did not highlight regarding the rotation of the engagement partner
for a maximum period of seven years and hence the firm is not complying with SQC 1.
Question 6
PQR & Associates, Chartered Accountants, is a partnership firm having 3 partners CA P, CA Q and CA R. PQR
& Associates are appointed as Statutory Auditors of ABC Limited, a listed entity for the financial year 2021-
22 and CA P is appointed as Engagement Partner for the audit of ABC Limited. Before issuing the Audit
Report of ABC Limited, CA P asked CA R to perform Engagement Quality Control Review and is of the view
that his responsibility will be reduced after review by CA R. Whether the contention of CA P is correct? What
are the aspects that need to be considered by CA R while performing Engagement Quality Control Review
for audit of financial statements of ABC Limited? (PYP 5 Marks May ‘22)
Answer 6
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audit and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, the review does not reduce the responsibilities of
the engagement partner. Hence, contention of CA. P that after engagement quality control review by CA. R,
his responsibility will be reduced, is not correct.
However, CA. R needs to consider the following aspect while performing Engagement Quality Control Review
for audit of financial statements of a listed entity ABC Ltd.:
1. The engagement team’s evaluation of the firm’s independence in relation to the specific engagement.
2. Significant risks identified during the engagement and the responses to those risks.
3. Judgments made, particularly with respect to materiality and significant risks.
4. Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on matters involving differences of opinion or other
difficult or contentious matters, and the conclusions arising from those consultations.
5. The significance and disposition of corrected and uncorrected misstatements identified during the
engagement.
6. The matters to be communicated to management and those charged with governance and, where
applicable, other parties such as regulatory bodies.
7. Whether working papers selected for review reflect the work performed in relation to the significant
judgments and support the conclusions reached.
8. The appropriateness of the report to be issued.
Engagement quality control reviews for engagements other than audits of financial statements of listed
entities may, depending on the circumstances, include some or all of these considerations.
Exam Insights: Responsibility of engagement partner and aspects to be considered while performing
engagement quality control review: Examinees concluded the answer without giving reference of SQC 1
and majority of them covered only one aspect of independence of engagement team and failed to mention
all other aspects to be covered under quality review.
Question 7
AP & Associates, Chartered Accountants, are Statutory Auditors of XP Limited for the last four years. XP
Limited is engaged in the manufacture and marketing of FMCG Goods in India. During 2021-22, the Company
has diversified and commenced providing software solutions in the area of "e-commerce" in India as well
as in certain European countries. AP & Associates, while carrying out the audit for the current financial year,
1.1 - 5 Chapter 1.1 SQC 1 – Quality Control for Firm
came to know that the company has expanded its operations into a new segment as well as new geography.
AP & Associates does not possess necessary expertise and infrastructure to carry out the audit of this
diversified business activities and accordingly wishes to withdraw from the engagement and client
relationship. Discuss the issues that need to be addressed before deciding to withdraw.
(PYP 5 Marks Nov’22)
Answer 7
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Specific Engagements: As per SQC 1, “Quality
Control for Firms that Perform Audit and Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and other Assurance
and Related Services Engagements”, the firm should establish policies and procedures for the acceptance
and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements, designed to provide it with reasonable
assurance that it will undertake or continue relationships and engagements only where it is competent to
perform the engagement and has the capabilities, time and resources to do so.
In the given case, AP & Associates, Chartered Accountants, statutory auditors of XP Limited for the last four
years, came to know that the company has expanded its operations into a new segment as well as new
geography. AP & Associates does not possess necessary expertise for the same, therefore, AP & Associates
wish to withdraw from the engagement and client relationship. Policies and procedures on withdrawal from
an engagement or from both the engagement and the client relationship address issues that include the
following:
• Discussing with the appropriate level of the client’s management and those charged with its governance
regarding the appropriate action that the firm might take based on the relevant facts and circumstances.
• If the firm determines that it is appropriate to withdraw, discussing with the appropriate level of the
client’s management and those charged with its governance withdrawal from the engagement or from
both the engagement and the client relationship, and the reasons for the withdrawal.
• Considering whether there is a professional, regulatory or legal requirement for the firm to remain in
place, or for the firm to report the withdrawal from the engagement, or from both the engagement and
the client relationship, together with the reasons for the withdrawal, to regulatory authorities.
• Documenting significant issues, consultations, conclusions and the basis for the conclusions.
AP & Associates should address the above issues before deciding to withdraw.
Exam Insights: SQC 1 - Issues to be addressed at the time of withdrawal from the audit engagement: Very
few examinees gave reference of SQC 1 and the documentation requirement under SQC 1. Many examinees
referred to the procedure to be followed by the auditor at the time of resignation from audit engagement
and various statutory forms to be filed with the registrar of companies.
Question 8
TPX & Co., Chartered Accountants is a large audit firm. It maintains audit documentation both electronically
and in physical form (hard files). The physical files are neither scanned and incorporated into electronic files
nor cross-referenced to the electronic files. Further, there are many instances where audit working papers
do not contain details as to whether information was obtained from client or prepared by engagement
team. How do you view above situation from point of view of quality control system in audit firm? Analyse.
(MTP 5 Marks Mar’24)
Answer 8
In accordance with SQC 1,” Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial
Information and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements” the firm should establish policies and
procedures designed to maintain confidentiality, safe custody, integrity, accessibility and retrievability of
engagement documentation.
In the given situation, the physical files are neither scanned and incorporated in the electronic files nor cross-
referenced to the electronic files. Inability to do so shows that firm has not established policies and procedures
to maintain integrity of engagement documentation. Lack of ensuring the same makes it difficult to
demonstrate completeness of audit files and whether these were assembled within 60 days timeframe
stipulated in SQC 1.
Question 9
SS Ltd. is a company listed in India. The Company has appointed M/s Z & Co. as auditors. Mr. Q, a CA has
recently joined the firm and has been appointed as the engagement partner for the first time. He
understands that it is necessary to ensure the compliance of independence for the audit team as per
standard audit practices. But he could not find as such, any policies and procedures available with the firm
in documented form. Why do you think that the firm should have policies and procedures to ensure the
independence of the firm in every assignment? How does an engagement partner ensure the compliance
of independence? Discuss with reference to relevant SAs. (PYP 5 Marks Nov’23)
Answer 9
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements,” the firm should establish policies and procedures
designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that the firm, its personnel and, where applicable, other s
subject to independence requirements (including experts contracted by the firm and network firm
personnel), maintain independence where required by the Code. Such policies and procedures should enable
the firm to:
(i) Communicate its independence requirements to its personnel and, where applicable, to others subject
to them; and
(ii) Identify and evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence, and to take
appropriate action to eliminate those threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by applying
safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the engagement.
Further, as per SA 220, “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements”, the engagement partner shall
form a conclusion on compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit engagement.
In doing so, the engagement partner shall:
(i) Obtain relevant information from the firm and, where applicable, network firms, to identify and
evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence.
(ii) Evaluate information on identified breaches, if any, of the firm’s independence policies and
procedures to determine whether they create a threat to independence for the audit engagement;
and
(iii) Take appropriate action to eliminate such threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by applying
safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the audit engagement, where withdrawal
is permitted by law or regulation. The engagement partner shall promptly report to the firm any
inability to resolve the matter for appropriate action.
Question 10
(Includes concepts of SA 220)
CA Giri is a senior partner of M/s TSV Associates. M/s TSV Associates is a reputed firm of Chartered
Accountants which has been in practice for more than five decades. The firm undertakes statutory audits of
large listed companies across various industry sectors and has more than fifty qualified experienced
professionals. CA Giri has been assigned as an Engagement Quality Control Reviewer for an audit issues
engagement of a listed company. What are the aspects, which would be looked into by CA Giri as an EQCR in
relation to the engagement?
Upon completion of the review, CA Giri has identified certain, with respect to revenue recognition and
adequacy of provisions relating to onerous contracts. The views of CA Giri are not accepted by the
Engagement Partner. Suggest the ways of resolving the differences of opinion between CA Giri and the
engagement partner. (PYP 5 Marks May ‘24)
Answer 10
As per SA 220, “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements”, for audits of financial statements of listed
entities, CA. Giri, the engagement quality control reviewer, on performing an engagement quality control
review, shall also consider the following:
(i) The engagement team’s evaluation of the firm’s independence in relation to the audit engagement;
(ii) Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on matters involving differences of opinion or other
difÏcult or contentious matters, and the conclusions arising from those consultations;
(iii) Whether audit documentation selected for review reflects the work performed in relation to the significant
judgments made and supports the conclusions reached.
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviewsof Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements,”, there might be difference of opinion within
engagement team, with those consulted and between engagement partner and engagement quality control
reviewer. The report should only be issued after resolution of such differences. In case, recommendations of
engagement quality control reviewer are not accepted by engagement partner and matter is not resolved to
reviewer’s satisfaction, the matter should be resolved by following established procedures of firm like by
consulting with another practitioner or firm, or a professional or regulatory body.
In the given situation, under completion of review, CA. Giri, Engagement Quality Control Reviewer has identified
certain issues. However, the view of CA Giri, the EQCR are not accepted by the Engagement Partner. This
difference of opinion among the CA Giri and Engagement Partner shouldbe resolved with abovementioned
manner as per SQC 1.
Question 11
SPS & Associates, Chartered Accountants, are statutory auditors of Grec Limited for the last two years. Grec
Limited is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceutical goods in India. During the year
2023-24, the company has diversified and commenced providing software solutions in "e-commerce" in
India as well as in certain African countries. SPS & Associates, while carrying out the audit, noticed that the
company has expanded its operations into a new segment as well as in a new country. SPS & Associates
does not possess the necessary expertise and infrastructure to carry out the audit of these diversified
business activities and accordingly wishes to withdraw from the engagement and client relationship. Discuss
the issues that need to be addressed before deciding to withdraw. (MTP 5 Marks Sep’24)
Answer 11
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information,
and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, the firm should establish policies and procedures for
the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements, designed to provide it with
Scope
Design and perform audit procedures in such a way as to enable the auditor to obtain sufÏcient appropriate
audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions on which tobase the auditor’s opinion.
Question 1
Answer 1
As per SA 500, “Audit Evidence”, when information to be used as audit evidence has been prepared using the
work of a management expert, the auditor shall, to the extent necessary, having regard to the significance of
that expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes:
(i) Evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of that expert;
(ii) Obtain an understanding of the work of that expert; and
(iii) Evaluate the appropriateness of that expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant assertion.
Further, the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures in relation to the requirement relating to information
to be used as audit evidence prepared using the work of a management’s expert may be affected by such
matters as:
(i) The nature and complexity of the matter to which the management’s expert relates.
(ii) The risks of material misstatement in the matter.
(iii) The availability of alternative sources of audit evidence.
(iv) The nature, scope and objectives of the management’s expert’s work.
(v) Whether the management’s expert is employed by the entity or is a party engaged by it to provide relevant
services.
(vi) The extent to which management can exercise control or influence over the work of the management’s
expert.
(vii) Whether the management’s expert is subject to technical performance standards or other professional or
industry requirements.
(viii) The nature and extent of any controls within the entity over the management’s expert’s work.
Question 2
During the course of the audit of TK Home Private Limited, a recognized export house engaged in manufacturing
of T-shirts under brand name of “TK”. CA Tripti is verifying export revenues of the company for the year 2022-
23. She has verified transactions entered in “Export Sales” account maintained in accounting software from
relevant export invoices. The export sales are being made on payment of IGST, for which a refund is
automatically credited in the account of the company after the goods are shipped.
On enquiring from internal audit staff regarding the recognition of export revenues, she is told that export sales
are recognized for the year on the basis of “Bills of Lading”. However, she is not convinced with such a response
and feels that the same does not appear to be proper.
She finds that three export invoices bearing dates in the month of March 2023 having a value of ₹ 75.00 lacs
have not been recognized in export revenue on the ground that bills of lading for these invoices were issued in
the month of April 2023.
Discuss from what sources she can obtain reliable audit evidence in this regard. How can she challenge
management’s assertion regarding the completeness of export revenues for the year 2022-23? (SM)
Answer 2
She can obtain reliable audit evidence by going through GST returns filed by the company on GST portal and
correlating the same with e-way bills. She can obtain audit evidence about how company has reflected its export
Question 3
Yupee (P) Ltd. got incorporated on 15th May 2021 and Mr. Harsh, the director of Yupee (P) Ltd. proposed to
Kamal & Co. on 24th May 2021, for being appointed as its statutory auditor. Mr. Kamal, the sole proprietor of
Kamal & Co., after checking the compliance with all the statutory requirements, accepted the said offer and
issued an audit engagement letter vide email to Yupee (P) Ltd.
Mr. Harsh found all terms of audit engagement to be proper but in the paragraph relating to auditor’s
responsibly in the engagement letter, as produced below:-
“We will conduct our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs), issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India (ICAI). Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from
material misstatement.”
Certain queries raised in his mind that what does reasonable assurance meant? Which Standard on Auditing
requires the auditor to obtain such reasonable assurance? Is it possible to give absolute assurance on such
financial statements?
Assuming that you are Mr. Kamal, the newly appointed statutory auditor of Yupee (P) Ltd. Please address to
the queries of Mr. Harsh as stated above. (MTP 5 Marks, Apr’22)
Answer 3
As per SA 200, “Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with
Standards on Auditing”, the auditor is required:-
“To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether
the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial
reporting framework.”
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance and is less than absolute assurance. It is obtained when the
auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk (i.e., the risk that the auditor
expresses an inappropriate opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated) to an acceptably low
level.
The auditor is not expected to, and cannot, reduce audit risk to zero and cannot therefore obtain absolute
assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement due to fraud or error. This is
because there are inherent limitations of an audit, which result in most of the audit evidence on which the
auditor draws conclusions and bases the auditor’s opinion being persuasive rather than conclusive. The inherent
limitations of an audit arise from:
• The nature of financial reporting;
• The nature of audit procedures; and
• The need for the audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable cost.
Question 4
M/s SG & Co. Chartered Accountants were appointed as Statutory Auditors of XYZ Limited for the F.Y 2020-
2021. The Company implemented internal controls for prevention and early detection of any fraudulent
Question 5
You are the team leader of 10 members for an audit of a Multinational Company. All the team members are
concerned about audit documentation in order to provide evidence that the audit complies with SAs. Hence,
the team members wish to document every matter concerned. In your opinion it is neither necessary nor
practicable for the auditor to document every matter considered or professional judgement made in an
audit. Further you feel that it is unnecessary for the auditor to document separately compliance with matters
for which compliance is demonstrated by documents included within the audit file. Illustrate by giving
examples with reference to relevant Standard on Auditing. (PYP 5 Marks, May’22)
Answer 5
SA 230, “Audit Documentation”, provides evidence that the audit complies with SAs. However, it is neither
necessary nor practicable for the auditor to document every matter considered, or professional judgment
made, in an audit.
For example,
(i) the existence of an adequately documented audit plan demonstrates that the auditor has planned the
audit.
Exam Insights:
SA 230 on Audit Documentation - Necessity of maintaining documentation for each and every matter:
Examinees failed to understand the requirement of the question and explained that audit documents
are to be maintained in temporary and permanent audit files. Illustrations as required by the question
were also not mentioned by most of the examinees.
1. The audit team has obtained the following results from the trade receivables circularization of Nemi Co
for the year ended 31 March 2023.
Customer Balance as per Balance as per customer Comment
sales ledger confirmation
₹ ₹
AM Co. 2,25,000 2,25,000
AN Co. 3,50,000 2,75,000 Invoice raised on 29 March 2023
AO Co. 6,20,000 4,80,000 Payment made on 30 March 2023
AP Co. 5,35,000 5,35,000 A balance of ₹ 45,000 is currently
AR Co. 1,78,000 No reply being disputed by AP Co.
Which of the following statements in relation to the results of the trade receivables circularization is TRUE?
(MTP 1 Mark Sep’23 ,Apr’19 & Apr’21)
(a) No further audit procedures need to be carried out in relation to the outstanding balances with AM Co.
and AP Co.
(b) The difference in relation to AN Co. represents a timing difference and should be agreed to a pre - year-
end invoice.
(c) The difference in relation to AO Co. represents a timing difference and should be agreed to pre - year-
end bank statements.
(d) Due to the non-reply, the balance with AR Co. cannot be verified and a different customer balance should
be selected and circularized.
Ans: (b)
2. You are the audit manager of Ranker & Co are responsible for the audit work to be managed for the fixed
assets of the company. Ranker & Co has 5 properties amounting to Rs.11.5 crore. One of the important
tasks ahead for you is to confirm the ownership of these properties.
Which of the following would provide the most persuasive evidence of the ownership?
(MTP 1 Marks Apr’21)
3. JIN Ltd issued a prospectus in respect of an IPO which had the auditor’s report on the financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2022. The issue was fully subscribed.
During this year, there was an abnormal rise in the profits of the company for which i t was found later
on that it was because of manipulated sales in which there was participation of Whole-time director and
other top officials of the company. On discovery of this fact, the company offered to refund all moneys
to the subscribers of the shares and sued the auditors for the damages alleging that the auditors failed
to examine and ascertain any satisfactory explanation for steep increase in the rate of profits and related
accounts.
The company emphasized that the auditor should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have
followed selected verification. The auditors were able to prove that they found internal controls to be
satisfactory and did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion.
The company was not able to prove that auditors were negligent in performance of their duties. Which of
the following is correct: (MTP 1 Mark Mar’23)
(a) The stand of the company was correct in this case. Considering the nature of the work, the Auditors
should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have followed selected verification.
(b) The approach of the auditors looks reasonable in this case. The auditors found internal controls to be
satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion and hence they performed their
procedures on the basis of selected verification.
(c) In the given case, the auditors should have involved various experts along with them to help them on
their audit procedures. Prospectus is one area wherein management involves various experts and hence
the auditors should also have done that. In the given case, by not involving the experts the auditors did
not perform their job in a professional manner. If they had involved experts like forensic experts etc.,
the manipulation could have been detected. Hence the auditors should be held liable.
(d) In case of such type of engagements, the focus is always on the management controls. If the controls
are found to be effective, then an auditor can never be held liable in respect of any deficiency or
misstatement or fraud.
Ans: (b)
4. The following inherent limitations in an audit affect the auditor’s ability to detect material misstatements
except: (MTP 1 Mark Sep’22)
(a) Test and sampling.
(b) Audit process permeated by judgement.
(c) Poor corporate governance.
(d) Audit evidence.
Ans: (c)
5. Below is an extract from the list of supplier statements as at 31st March 2022 held by the Company and
corresponding payables ledger balances at the same date along with some commentary on the noted
differences:
Supplier Statement balance Payables ledger balance
₹'000 ₹'000
Shubh Company 78 66
Labh Company 235 205
The difference in the balance of Shubh Company is due to an invoice which is under dispute due to defective
goods which were returned on 30th March 2022. Which of the following audit procedures should be carried out
to confirm the balance owing to Shubh Company?
6. You are the audit senior in charge of the audit of Swadhyay Co. and have been informed by your audit
manager that during the current year a fraud occurred at the client. A payroll clerk sets up fictitious
employees and the wages were paid into the clerk’s own bank account. This clerk has subsequently left
the company, but the audit manager is concerned that additional frauds have ta ken place in the wages
department. Which of the following audit procedures would be undertaken during the audit of wages as
a result of the manager’s assessment of the increased risk of fraud?
(1) Discuss with the payroll manager the nature of the payroll fraud, how it occurred and the financial
impact of amounts incorrectly paid into the payroll clerk’s bank account.
(2) Review the supporting documentation to confirm the total of the fraudulent payments made and
assess the materiality of this misstatement.
(3) Review and test the internal controls surrounding setting up of and payments to new joiners to assess
whether further frauds may have occurred.
(4) Review the legal action taken by the management against the payroll clerk who was involved in the
fraud and see whether he is punished for his actions. (MTP 2 Marks Oct’19, MTP 1 Mark Apr’23)
(a) Audit procedures 1,2,3.
(b) Audit procedures 2,3,4.
(c) Audit procedures 1,3,4.
(d) Audit procedures 1,2,4.
Ans: (a)
7. Andromeda Limited issued a prospectus in respect of an IPO which had the auditor’s report on the
financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2021. The issue was fully subscribed. During this
year, there was an abnormal rise in the profits of the company for which it was found later that it was
because of Dealer dumping technique used by the company to inflate the sales. Upon further
investigation it was identified that the Whole-time director and other top officials of the company were
involved in the scheme. On discovery of this fact, the company offered to refund all moneys to the
subscribers of the shares and sued the auditors for the damages alleging that the auditors failed to
examine and ascertain any satisfactory explanation for steep increase in the rate of profits and related
accounts.
The company emphasized that the auditor should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have
followed selected verification. In response, the auditors were able to prove that they found internal
controls to be satisfactory based on the samples which were selected for testing design and operating
effectiveness and did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion. Further, they were able to prove to
the satisfaction that the sampling performed for substantive procedures was also appropriate as per
sampling guidelines and was sufficient to reflect the population.
The company was not able to prove that auditors were negligent in the performance of their duties. You
are required to advise on the same. (MTP 1 Mark Nov’21, Oct 19 & Mar’22)
(a) The stand of the company was correct in this case. Considering the nature of the work, the Auditors
should have proceeded with suspicion and should not have followed selected verification.
(b) The approach of the auditors appears to be reasonable in this case. The auditors found internal controls
to be satisfactory and also did not find any circumstance to arouse suspicion and hence they performed
their procedures on the basis of selected verification.
8. Mr. C, auditor of a listed company, DEX Limited, signed its audit report on 21.8.2021. The regulator called
the audit file in connection with some proceedings on 20.7.2022. He submitted audit files in the form of
editable Excel files without any security feature on 10.8.2022. It later transpired that the audit file was
modified between 20.7.2022 and 10.8.2022 by deleting certain information and adding fresh information
in its place. Which of the following statements is likely to be correct in this regard? (MTP 1 Mark Oct’23)
(a) Audit file was required to be assembled by 21.8 2021. Modification in the audit file after 21.8.2021 was
generally not permissible.
(b) Audit file was required to be assembled by 21.8 2021. Modification in the audit file before 20.7.2022 was
generally permissible.
(c) Audit file was required to be assembled by 20.10.2021. Modification in the audit file before 20.7.2022
was generally permissible.
(d) Audit file was required to be assembled by 20.10.2021. Modification in the audit file after 20.10.2021
was generally not permissible except in certain exceptional circumstances.
Ans: (d)
9. Bahu Subahu Co. LLP is an old firm of Chartered Accountants with Bahu and Subahu as the audit partners.
The firm has various statutory audit and internal audit engagements which are looked after by Bahu and
Subahu respectively. In the previous year ended 31 March 2022, one of the audit engagements of the firm
was picked up for peer review and peer reviewer raised various observations regarding the audit
documentation. Some of the information regarding audits were missing from the audit files as per the
observation of the peer reviewer.
Bahu and Subahu are in the process of establishing a robust mechanism for audit documentation so that
the same is available for a long duration and would lead to audit efficiencies also in the future years. Bahu
and Subahu would like to understand the period for which audit documentation should be maintained by
them as per the Standard on Auditing 230. Please advise. (MTP 1 Mark, Mar’23, RTP May’19)
(a) 10 years.
(b) 9 years.
(c) 8 years.
(d) 7 years.
Ans: (d)