FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE L'AUTOMOBILE

Agendas:
A. Evaluation and Implementation of Overtaking Aids for 2030
B. The Future of the Monaco Grand Prix
C. Re-investigation of the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

Page 1 of 16
S. No Content Page No.
1. Letter From the Executive Board 3
2. HCC-UNSC Mandate 4
3. Cuba and The Crisis 5
4. Important Points to Remember 10
5. Documentation 11
6. References 13

Page 2 of 16
 Letter from the Executive Board

Dear Delegates,

Welcome to TGS MUN 24 and the distinguished platform of the Fédération Internationale de
l'Automobile (FIA). We are absolutely thrilled to have you with us as we delve into the
critical discussions that will shape the future of motorsport. It’s an honor for us to serve as
your Executive Board, and we are eager to witness the energy, creativity, and thoughtful
perspectives that each of you will bring to this forum.

This year, we’ll be exploring some of the most significant and thought-provoking issues in
the world of racing. From the divisive debate over the necessity and fairness of overtaking
aids to the heated discussions surrounding the future of iconic circuits like Monaco, our
agendas are sure to stir strong opinions. And, of course, the re-investigation of the 2021 Abu
Dhabi Grand Prix—an event that continues to divide fans and experts alike—promises to be
one of the most contentious topics of the conference.

As you prepare for the conference, we encourage you to engage deeply with the materials
provided and go beyond the Background Guide. Your research and unique insights are
crucial to enriching the debate and fostering innovative solutions.

We understand that participating in a MUN can be both exciting and challenging, especially
for those new to the experience. Rest assured, we’re here to support you throughout this
journey. Should you have any questions, whether procedural or substantive, please do not
hesitate to reach out to us. We are committed to ensuring that you have a rewarding and
enriching experience.

In this setting, we value active participation, confidence in your ideas, and a collaborative
spirit. We encourage you to come prepared, stay confident, and engage fully in the
discussions. Don’t hesitate to share your viewpoints and work together to craft effective and
innovative resolutions.

We eagerly anticipate meeting each of you and are excited to see the perspectives and
innovative solutions you will bring to the table. Together, let’s ensure TGS MUN 24 becomes
more than just a conference—a platform for dynamic discussions and lasting contributions to
the world of Formula 1 and Motorsport at large.

Best regards,

Vishal Chowdhury – President of FIA

Raunaq Sinha – Vice-President of FIA

Hrisheek Vavilapally – Secretary of FIA

Page 3 of 16
 About the FIA

The Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) is the governing body at the forefront of
global motorsport, responsible for regulating, advancing, and safeguarding the integrity of
racing disciplines worldwide, with Formula 1 being its crown jewel. The FIA plays a pivotal
role in shaping the future of motorsport through its comprehensive mandate, regulatory
powers, and structured functioning, ensuring that the sport remains fair, competitive, and
aligned with the latest technological advancements.
Mandate
The FIA’s mandate is to oversee the safe and fair conduct of motorsport, particularly in
Formula 1, where innovation and competition push the boundaries of what’s possible.
Established in 1904, the FIA has been entrusted with creating and enforcing the technical
and sporting regulations that govern the sport. This includes everything from car design
specifications to race procedures, ensuring that Formula 1 maintains its status as the
pinnacle of motorsport.
Central to the FIA’s mandate is the balance between promoting technological innovation and
ensuring the safety of all participants. The FIA is responsible for implementing safety
measures that protect drivers, teams, and spectators, while also fostering an environment
where cutting-edge automotive technology can thrive. The organization is also dedicated to
advancing sustainability in the sport, encouraging the adoption of environmentally friendly
practices and technologies.
Powers of the FIA
The FIA wields significant authority in regulating Formula 1, with the power to shape the
sport's present and future. These powers include:
1. Regulating Formula 1: The FIA establishes and enforces the regulations that define
the sport, covering technical aspects of vehicle design, race operations, and safety
protocols. These regulations ensure that all teams compete on a level playing field,
while also pushing the sport forward through technological innovation.
2. Ensuring Safety Standards: Safety is paramount in Formula 1, and the FIA is at the
forefront of developing and enforcing measures that protect everyone involved. This
includes setting rigorous safety standards for car construction, driver protection, and
race management.
3. Promoting Sustainability: The FIA is committed to reducing the environmental impact
of Formula 1. This includes advocating for the use of hybrid and electric powertrains,
optimizing race logistics, and setting targets for reducing the sport's carbon footprint.
4. Conducting Investigations and Reviews: The FIA has the authority to investigate
incidents during races, such as crashes or rule violations, and to review race results
and decisions. This ensures that all aspects of the competition are conducted fairly
and transparently.
5. Influencing Motorsport Policy: The FIA works closely with teams, manufacturers, and
other stakeholders to shape the regulations and policies that will guide the future of
Formula 1. This includes everything from technological advancements to maintaining
the heritage of the sport's most iconic races.

Page 4 of 16
Functioning of the FIA
The FIA operates through a well-organized structure that allows it to effectively manage the
complexities of Formula 1. Key aspects of its functioning include:
1. Governance: The FIA is governed by a General Assembly and the World Motor Sport
Council, which includes representatives from its member organizations. These bodies
are responsible for making key decisions about the sport, including the election of the
FIA President, who oversees the implementation of policies and regulations.
2. Agenda Setting: The FIA’s agenda is shaped by the current needs and future
challenges of Formula 1. At TGS MUN 24, our discussions will reflect this agenda,
focusing on critical issues such as the implementation of new overtaking aids for the
2030 season, the future of the Monaco Grand Prix, and the re-investigation of the
controversial 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. These topics are not only crucial for the
sport’s evolution but also represent the FIA’s ongoing efforts to balance innovation,
fairness, and the preservation of racing traditions.
3. Decision-Making: Decisions within the FIA are made through its various
commissions and councils, which focus on different aspects of Formula 1, such as
safety, technology, and competition. These decisions are crucial in steering the sport
towards a future that is both exciting and sustainable.
4. Implementation and Monitoring: Once decisions are made, the FIA ensures they are
implemented across all teams and events in Formula 1. This includes monitoring
compliance with regulations, conducting reviews, and making adjustments as needed
to keep the sport aligned with its goals.
5. Engagement with Stakeholders: The FIA maintains active engagement with all
stakeholders in Formula 1, including teams, drivers, manufacturers, and fans. This
collaborative approach ensures that the sport remains dynamic and responsive to the
needs of its global audience.
Through these roles and responsibilities, the FIA ensures that Formula 1 remains at the
cutting edge of motorsport, driving forward both the technical innovation and the competitive
spirit that make the sport so exhilarating.

Page 5 of 16
 Agenda A: Evaluation and Implementation of Overtaking Aids for 2030
Overview
As Formula 1 approaches 2030, the sport faces significant changes in how overtaking is
managed. The upcoming 2026 regulations, featuring aerodynamic modes like "X-mode" and
"Z-mode," aim to enhance racing dynamics while balancing excitement and competitive
integrity. These innovations build on previous systems like Kinetic Energy Recovery System
(KERS) and Drag Reduction System (DRS), which have shaped the evolution of overtaking in
the sport.
[Insert Image: Diagram showing evolution of KERS, DRS, and 2026 aerodynamic modes]
History and Key Developments
Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS):
 Introduction and Impact: KERS, introduced in 2009, allowed cars to store and use
energy for overtaking. It evolved into Energy Recovery Systems (ERS), influencing
race strategy and energy management in Formula 1.

Drag Reduction System (DRS):

 Introduction and Evolution: Introduced in 2011 to increase overtaking, DRS has been
both praised for boosting action and criticized for making overtaking too easy.
Adjustments have been made over the years to balance its effectiveness.

Page 6 of 16
2026 Aerodynamic Regulations:
 X-mode and Z-mode: These modes will allow dynamic control over aerodynamic
settings, offering flexibility and strategy in overtaking. X-mode enhances straight-line
speed, while Z-mode improves cornering grip.
Insights from Other Racing Series
Formula E’s Attack Mode:
 Overview and Potential in F1: Attack Mode allows temporary power boosts through
activation zones, adding strategic depth. A similar system could be adapted in F1,
allowing for tactical overtaking with aerodynamic or power boosts.

IndyCar’s Push-to-Pass:
 Overview and Potential in F1: Push-to-Pass in IndyCar offers a temporary power
boost, available a limited number of times per race. This could be integrated into F1,
offering drivers strategic power boosts to enhance overtaking opportunities.

Stakeholder Perspectives
Proponents of Innovation:
 Teams like Mercedes and Red Bull support integrating new aerodynamic modes,
viewing them as enhancements to strategy and excitement in racing.

Page 7 of 16
Critics of Technological Aids:
 Traditionalists argue that overtaking should rely more on driver skill than on
technological aids, expressing concerns over the complexity these new modes might
introduce.
Potential Solutions
Strategic Use of "X-mode" and "Z-mode":
 Implement clear guidelines for using these modes, possibly limiting their activation to
add strategic depth.
Enhanced Hybrid Systems:
 Integrate these aerodynamic modes with hybrid systems, rewarding drivers who can
effectively manage both power and aerodynamics.
Circuit-Specific Adjustments:
 Tailor the activation of these modes to specific circuits, allowing for full utilization
where overtaking is difficult.
Phasing Out DRS:
 Gradually reduce reliance on DRS, shifting focus to more driver-dependent
overtaking methods as these new modes become more prevalent.
Conclusion
The introduction of "X-mode" and "Z-mode" in 2026 presents a significant opportunity for
Formula 1 to evolve, but it also comes with challenges that require careful consideration.
These innovations have the potential to redefine the dynamics of overtaking, making races
more strategic and engaging. However, their successful implementation will depend on
finding a balance between embracing new technology and preserving the essence of the
sport.
The discussion on this agenda should focus not only on the technical aspects of these new
modes but also on their broader implications for the sport. How will these changes impact
the competitive balance? Will they enhance the spectator experience, or could they introduce
new complexities that detract from the racing? These are critical questions that need to be
addressed.

Page 8 of 16
 Agenda B: The Future of the Monaco Grand Prix
Overview
As Formula 1 continues to evolve, the Monaco Grand Prix remains a cornerstone of the
sport, renowned for its glamour, prestige, and historic significance. However, the challenges
of adapting this iconic race to meet the demands of modern F1 are becoming increasingly
apparent. The discussion surrounding the future of the Monaco Grand Prix focuses on
balancing the race's historical charm with the need for advancements in safety,
sustainability, and competitiveness.

History and Significance

 Historical Context: The Monaco Grand Prix has been a fixture of the Formula 1
calendar since 1950, making it one of the oldest and most prestigious races in the
sport. The circuit's tight corners, narrow streets, and elevation changes create a
unique challenge for drivers, earning it a place as one of the most demanding tracks
in motorsport. The race is also steeped in glamour, attracting celebrities and royalty
and becoming a symbol of luxury and exclusivity in the racing world.
 Cultural Impact: Monaco is more than just a race; it is an event that embodies the
spirit of Formula 1. The circuit’s location through the streets of Monte Carlo provides
an unparalleled backdrop, combining the thrill of high-speed racing with the allure of
the Mediterranean coast. The race's cultural significance extends beyond the sport,
influencing fashion, entertainment, and even the global perception of wealth and
success.

Current Challenges

Page 9 of 16
  Safety Concerns: The unique characteristics that make Monaco iconic also present
significant safety challenges. The circuit’s narrow streets and minimal run-off areas
were not designed for the size and speed of modern Formula 1 cars. This raises
questions about whether the track can continue to meet the sport's stringent safety
standards without losing its distinctive character. Recent accidents and near-misses
have highlighted the risks, prompting discussions on potential modifications to
improve driver safety.
 Environmental Impact: Monaco's dense urban setting and limited space for
spectators and infrastructure pose environmental challenges. The Grand Prix
generates a significant carbon footprint, both from the event itself and the influx of
visitors. As Formula 1 pushes towards a more sustainable future, the environmental
impact of continuing to hold a race in such a location is under scrutiny. Measures
such as reducing waste, increasing energy efficiency, and offsetting carbon emissions
are being considered to align the event with F1's sustainability goals.
 Technological Advancements: Modern F1 cars are faster, wider, and more
technologically advanced than ever before, which has made overtaking in Monaco
increasingly difficult. The circuit’s design, which once tested the limits of driver skill,
now often results in processional races where overtaking is nearly impossible. This
challenge raises the question of whether the spectacle of Monaco can be preserved
while making the racing more competitive and engaging for fans.

Stakeholder Perspectives
 Teams and Drivers: Opinions among teams and drivers are divided. While some view
Monaco as a timeless challenge that tests driver skill and precision, others argue that
the circuit is no longer suitable for modern F1 cars. The difficulty in overtaking and
the heightened risk of accidents are common concerns. Some drivers cherish the
historical significance of the race, while others believe that changes are necessary to
maintain the sport's competitive integrity.
 Event Organizers: The Automobile Club de Monaco and local authorities are
committed to preserving the race’s legacy but are also aware of the need to address
safety and environmental concerns. They face the challenge of modernizing the event
without sacrificing the elements that make Monaco unique. This includes exploring

Page 10 of 16
 new technologies and sustainable practices that could enhance the race while
maintaining its prestigious status.
 Fans and Media: Public opinion is equally split. Many fans and media outlets see
Monaco as an essential part of the F1 calendar, a race that should remain untouched
by modern changes. However, there is also a growing sentiment that the event needs
to evolve to stay relevant in a sport that is increasingly driven by technological
innovation and environmental responsibility.
Potential Solutions
 Track Modifications: To address safety concerns, one solution could involve subtle
modifications to the circuit, such as widening certain sections or adding advanced
safety features like TecPro barriers. These changes would aim to improve driver
safety without drastically altering the character of the circuit. Another approach
could be the introduction of temporary run-off areas during the race weekend, which
could be removed afterward to preserve the track's normal appearance.
 Sustainability Initiatives: Monaco could lead by example in sustainability,
implementing green technologies and practices that reduce the race’s environmental
footprint. This could include using renewable energy sources for event infrastructure,
promoting public transportation to reduce traffic congestion, and partnering with
environmental organizations to offset the carbon emissions generated by the race.
The introduction of electric or hybrid support races could also showcase the
Principality’s commitment to sustainability.
 Calendar Positioning: Another option is to reconsider Monaco’s place in the F1
calendar. While the race’s prestige is unquestionable, alternating its slot with other
historic circuits could allow time for the necessary updates and improvements while
keeping Monaco relevant. This approach could also build anticipation and make the
Monaco Grand Prix a more exclusive event, further enhancing its appeal.
Conclusion
The Monaco Grand Prix is an irreplaceable part of Formula 1’s heritage, but its future
requires careful consideration. The balance between maintaining tradition and embracing
modern advancements is delicate yet essential. The race must evolve to meet the demands of
contemporary F1 while preserving the unique characteristics that have made it legendary.
Delegates are encouraged to explore solutions that address the outlined challenges while
ensuring that Monaco remains a crown jewel in the Formula 1 calendar.

Page 11 of 16
 Agenda C: Re-investigation of the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix
Overview
The 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix is widely regarded as one of the most contentious races in
Formula 1 history. The decisions made during the final laps of this race had a profound
impact on the World Championship, sparking widespread debate and controversy. This
agenda aims to re-examine the events, the decisions made by race officials, and their
implications, with a focus on understanding the fairness, transparency, and long-term effects
on the sport.

History and Context

 Race Overview: The 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix was the season finale, with
Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen entering the race tied in points, setting the
stage for a historic showdown. The race was fiercely competitive, with both
drivers displaying exceptional skill and determination.
 Controversial Decisions: In the final laps, a late-race safety car was deployed
following an incident. The race director’s handling of the restart, particularly the
decision to allow only certain lapped cars to un-lap themselves, led to a one-lap
shootout between Hamilton and Verstappen. Verstappen, on fresher tires, overtook
Hamilton on the final lap to win the race and the championship, leading to
immediate and intense controversy.
[Insert Image: Key moments from the final laps of the race]
Current Challenges
 Fairness and Integrity: The decisions made during the final laps have raised serious
questions about the consistency and fairness of race officiating in Formula 1. Many
believe that the rules were not applied uniformly, which compromised the integrity of
the sport. This re-investigation seeks to address these concerns and evaluate whether
the decisions were in line with the FIA’s regulations.
 Impact on the Sport: The controversy surrounding the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix
has had significant repercussions for Formula 1. It has led to changes in race
management, including the replacement of the race director, and has sparked a
broader conversation about how the sport is governed. The outcome of this re-
investigation could influence future regulations and race management protocols.
 Media and Public
Perception: The role of the
media in shaping public
perception of the race
cannot be understated.
The extensive coverage,
often polarized, has
contributed to the ongoing
debate over the legitimacy
of the race’s outcome. This
agenda will also explore
how media narratives
Page 12 of 16
 have influenced public opinion and what steps can be taken to ensure accurate and
balanced reporting in the future.

Stakeholder Perspectives
 Teams and Drivers: Mercedes and Lewis Hamilton have been particularly vocal
about their dissatisfaction with the race’s outcome, arguing that the rules were not
applied fairly. They have called for a thorough review of the decisions made by race
officials. In contrast, Red Bull and Max Verstappen maintain that the race was
conducted within the rules and that Verstappen’s championship victory was
legitimate.
 FIA and Race Officials: The FIA has faced significant scrutiny following the race.
The organization has acknowledged the controversy and initiated internal reviews to
assess the decisions made during the race. The re-investigation aims to provide a
transparent and detailed explanation of the race director’s decisions and whether
they adhered to FIA regulations.
 Fans and Media: The fanbase is deeply divided, with some supporting the outcome as
a fair result within the rules, while others feel that Hamilton was unfairly denied the
championship. The media has played a crucial role in amplifying these differing
viewpoints, further polarizing the debate. Understanding these perspectives is
essential for moving forward.

Page 13 of 16
Potential Solutions
 Clarification of Rules: One of the primary outcomes of the re-investigation should be
a clear and comprehensive clarification of the rules surrounding safety car
procedures, race restarts, and the process of un-lapping cars. This would help prevent
similar controversies in the future and ensure that all stakeholders have a clear
understanding of the rules.
 Review of Race Management Structure: A critical review of the race management
structure could lead to reforms in how decisions are made during high-pressure
situations. This might include the introduction of a more collaborative decision-
making process, where multiple officials are involved in critical decisions, or the
implementation of real-time consultation with teams during the race.
 Restoring Trust and Confidence: To restore trust in Formula 1, the FIA could issue a
formal statement acknowledging any mistakes made and outlining specific steps that
will be taken to improve transparency and consistency in race management. This
might also involve regular reviews of race procedures and increased communication
with teams and drivers to ensure that all parties are on the same page.
 Enhancing Transparency: The re-investigation might also lead to the introduction of
more transparent decision-making processes during races. This could include live
broadcasting of race director communications, ensuring that teams, drivers, and fans
have real-time insight into the decisions being made.
Conclusion
The 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix serves as a critical moment in Formula 1 history,
highlighting the importance of fairness, transparency, and consistency in race officiating.
The re-investigation into the events of that race provides an opportunity to address the
concerns that have arisen and to implement changes that will protect the integrity of the
sport moving forward. Delegates are encouraged to consider solutions that clarify the rules,
reform race management, and rebuild trust among teams, drivers, and fans. By doing so,
Formula 1 can ensure that such controversies are not repeated, and that the sport remains
competitive, fair, and respected on the global stage.

Page 14 of 16
 What a Regulation Must Answer
Agenda A: Evaluation and Implementation of Overtaking Aids for 2030
Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes:
Aim to enhance race competitiveness by evaluating and implementing new
overtaking aids like "X-mode" and "Z-mode."
Measure success by improved overtaking statistics and positive feedback from
teams and drivers.
Implementation Responsibilities:
Assign roles to the FIA, teams, and technical committees to oversee development,
testing, and integration of the aids.
Resource Allocation:
Mobilize resources from F1 teams, FIA technical departments, and research
institutions.
Allocate funding for R&D, testing, and implementation.
Monitoring and Evaluation:
Regularly review race data, conduct feedback sessions with stakeholders, and
adjust regulations as necessary.
Establish benchmarks for overtaking statistics and safety standards.
Stakeholder Perspectives:
Address concerns from teams about car design and budget implications.
Ensure the new aids do not disproportionately benefit or disadvantage any teams.
Agenda B: The Future of the Monaco Grand Prix
Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes:
Preserve Monaco’s heritage while adapting to modern F1 standards.
Success will be measured by continued inclusion in the F1 calendar and enhanced
race safety.
Implementation Responsibilities:
The Automobile Club de Monaco and FIA to oversee circuit modifications and
safety upgrades.
Engage environmental consultants to implement sustainability initiatives.
Resource Allocation:
Secure funding for infrastructure improvements and sustainability projects.
Mobilize local and international expertise for track modifications.
Monitoring and Evaluation:

Page 15 of 16
 Track environmental impact, safety incidents, and spectator satisfaction.
Annual reviews to assess the need for further changes.
Stakeholder Perspectives:
Balance traditionalist views with modern safety and environmental standards.
Ensure local community and global fanbase perspectives are considered.
Agenda C: Re-investigation of the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix
Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes:
Aim to restore trust in F1 by clarifying the rules and improving transparency.
Success will be reflected in the acceptance of the re-investigation outcomes by
teams, media, and fans.
Implementation Responsibilities:
The FIA to lead the investigation, with independent oversight.
Involve all relevant stakeholders, including teams and race officials.
Resource Allocation:
Allocate resources for a thorough investigation, including expert legal and
technical advisors.
Fund public relations efforts to communicate findings transparently.
Monitoring and Evaluation:
Regularly update stakeholders on the investigation’s progress.
Post-investigation, review the effectiveness of any implemented changes.
Stakeholder Perspectives:
Consider the views of all involved parties, ensuring that the process is perceived
as fair and unbiased.
Address concerns from fans and media regarding the transparency of the
investigation.

Page 16 of 16