Doc5
Doc5
Territorial sovereignty
Cyber activities that cause significant harm to another state without their consent can violate
territorial sovereignty.
Protection of civilians
Civilians are protected from cyber attacks unless they directly participate in hostilities.
Protection of certain objects and activities
Medical personnel, religious personnel, and humanitarian objects are protected.
Prohibition of certain actions
Targeting civilians, using indiscriminate weapons, and conducting indiscriminate or
disproportionate attacks are prohibited.
State jurisdiction
States have jurisdiction over cyber infrastructure located within their territory.
State obligations
States must meet their international obligations and not use proxies to commit internationally
wrongful acts.
Cyber law, also known as internet law or digital law, regulates digital activities and protects
individuals and organizations from cyber threats. It covers a wide range of issues,
including: Online communication, E-commerce, Digital privacy, and Preventing and prosecuting
cybercrimes.
The organization operates on the premise that international trade has global
benefits for its participants. With increasing economic
interdependence globally, UNCITRAL seeks to help expand and facilitate
global trade through the progressive harmonization and modernization of the
law of international trade.
Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all internet data
equally, without discrimination or preferential treatment. This means that ISPs should not block
or slow down access to certain content or services, or offer "fast lanes" to prioritize others.
Network neutrality, often referred to as net neutrality, is the principle that Internet
service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally,
offering users and online content providers consistent transfer rates regardless of
content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination
address, or method of communication (i.e., without price discrimination).[4][5] Net
neutrality was advocated for in the 1990s by the presidential administration of Bill
Clinton in the United States. Clinton's signing of the Telecommunications Act of 1996,
an amendment to the Communications Act of 1934, set a worldwide example for net
neutrality laws and the regulation of ISPs.[6][7][better source needed]
Supporters of net neutrality argue that it prevents ISPs from filtering Internet content
without a court order, fosters freedom of speech and democratic participation, promotes
competition and innovation, prevents dubious services, and maintains the end-to-end
principle, and that users would be intolerant of slow-loading websites. Opponents argue
that it reduces investment, deters competition, increases taxes, imposes unnecessary
regulations, prevents the Internet from being accessible to lower income individuals,
and prevents Internet traffic from being allocated to the most needed users, that
large ISPs already have a performance advantage over smaller providers, and that
there is already significant competition among ISPs with few competitive issues.
Promotes a free and open internet: Users can access content without restriction, as long as it
doesn't violate the law
Ensures equal access: All users and businesses have fair access to online content and services
Protects free speech: ISPs shouldn't be concerned with the content users view or post online
Provides equal opportunity: All internet-based businesses have an equal opportunity to
succeed
Facilitates freedom of expression: Net neutrality helps to improve journalism and freedom of
expression
Net neutrality is now a well-established principle of international law and human rights.