A framework of course development processes
A framework of course development processes
University of Southampton staff and students are reminded that copyright subsists in this extract
and the work from which it was taken.
This Digital Copy has been made under the terms of a CLA licence which allows you to:
• access and download a copy
• print out a copy
This Digital Copy and any digital or printed copy supplied to or made by you under the terms of
this Licence are for use in connection with this Course of Study. You may retain such copies after
the end of the course, but strictly for your own personal use.
All copies (including electronic copies) shall include this Copyright Notice and shall be destroyed
and/or deleted if and when required by the University.
Except as provided for by copyright law, no further copying, storage or distribution (including by e-
mail) is permitted without the consent of the copyright holder.
The author (which term includes artists and other visual creators) has moral rights in the work and
neither staff nor students may cause, or permit, the distortion, mutilation or other modification of
the work, or any other derogatory treatment of it, which would be prejudicial to the honour or
reputation of the author.
Graves, Kathleen. “A framework for course development processes”, from Hall, David (2001)
Innovation in English language teaching : a reader. London : Routledge in association with
Macquarie University and The Open University, pp.178-196.
Barcode: 1544341-1001
375.428 HAL
Chapter 15
Kathleen Graves
A FRAMEWORK OF C O U R S E
DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES
N e e d s assessment
M'Tiat are my students' needs? How can I assess them so that I can address them?
W h a t is n e e d s a s s e s s m e n t , ' a n d w h y d o e s a t e a c h e r u n d e r t a k e it? At its m o s t basic,
n e e d s a s s e s s m e n t involves finding o u t w h a t t h e l e a r n e r s k n o w and can d o and w h a t t h e y
n e e d t o l e a r n o r d o so t h a t t h e c o u r s e can b r i d g e t h e gap ( o r s o m e p a r t of it). T h u s n e e d s
a s s e s s m e n t involves s e e k i n g and i n t e r p r e t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t o n e ' s s t u d e n t s ' n e e d s so
t h a t t h e c o u r s e will a d d r e s s t h e m effectively. H o w e v e r , h o w o n e d e f i n e s a s t u d e n t ' s n e e d s
is a c o m p l e x issue o p e n t o i n t e r p r e t a t i o n . O n e way of c o n c e p t u a l i z i n g n e e d s is t o distinguish
b e t w e e n "objective" and "subjective" needs (Richterich 1980). Brindley (1989: 70) defines
objective needs as " d e r i v a b l e f r o m d i f f e r e n t k i n d s of factual i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t l e a r n e r s , t h e i r
u s e of l a n g u a g e in r e a l - l i f e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s i t u a t i o n s as w e l l as t h e i r c u r r e n t l a n g u a g e
p r o f i c i e n c y a n d l a n g u a g e difficulties" and subjective needs as " t h e c o g n i t i v e a n d affective n e e d s
of t h e l e a r n e r in t h e l e a r n i n g s i t u a t i o n , d e r i v a b l e f r o m i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t a f f e c t i v e and
c o g n i t i v e f a c t o r s s u c h as p e r s o n a l i t y , c o n f i d e n c e , a t t i t u d e s , l e a r n e r s ' w a n t s and e x p e c t a t i o n s
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 179
N e e d s assessment: What are my students' needs? How can 1 assess them so that I can address
them?
Conceptualizing content: What will be the backbone of what I teach? What will I include in my
syllabus?
Evaluation: How will I assess what students have learned? How will I assess the effectiveness of the
course?
pi (il)l(. in bcc ausc- many ol their s t u d e n t s have n o target n e e d s , n o clearly anticipated use for
the skills gained t h r o u g h study, l-.nglish may be a r e q u i r e m e n t for an exit or e n t r a n c e e x a m .
It may be viewed as a s u b j e c t like m a t h or science, o r it may be a social u n d e r t a k i n g like t h e
study ol music. For these s t u d e n t s , t h e n o t i o n of n e e d s o u t s i d e t h e classroom is t e n u o u s .
T h e locus ol t h e n e e d s assessment shifts t o the l e a r n i n g n e e d s o r subjective n e e d s of t h e
s t u d e n t s so as to increase motivation and to help s t u d e n t s find p u r p o s e and i n t e r e s t in w h a t
they are d o i n g in the c o u r s e . For e x a m p l e , G o r s u c h ( 1 9 9 1 ) describes a t e c h n i q u e f o r helping
s t u d e n t s in a conversation class in Japan articulate their n e e d s and set p e r i o d i c and achievable
goals t o m e e t those n e e d s .
hsues
D e t e r m i n i n g goals a n d o b j e c t i v e s
What arc the purposes and intended outcomes of the course? What will mj students need to do or learn
to achieve these goals? W h a t are goals and objectives and w h a t is t h e relationship b e t w e e n
t h e m ? G o a l s are g e n e r a l s t a t e m e n t s of t h e overall, l o n g - t e r m p u r p o s e s of t h e c o u r s e .
Objectives express the specific ways in w h i c h the goals will be achieved.The goals of a c o u r s e
r e p r e s e n t t h e d e s t i n a t i o n ; t h e objectives, the various p o i n t s t h a t c h a r t t h e c o u r s e t o w a r d
the d e s t i n a t i o n . To arrive at the d e s t i n a t i o n , o n e m u s t pass each of t h e s e p o i n t s . [. . .]
W h y set goals and objectives? Setting goals and objectives p r o v i d e s a sense of d i r e c t i o n
and a c o h e r e n t f r a m e w o r k f o r the t e a c h e r in p l a n n i n g h e r c o u r s e . Breaking goals d o w n i n t o
objectives is very m u c h like m a k i n g a m a p of t h e t e r r i t o r y t o be e x p l o r e d . It is a way f o r t h e
t e a c h e r t o c o n c e p t u a l i z e h e r c o u r s e in t e r m s of teachable c h u n k s . Clear goals and objectives
give t h e t e a c h e r a basis f o r d e t e r m i n i n g w h i c h c o n t e n t and activities are a p p r o p r i a t e f o r h e r
c o u r s e . T h e y also p r o v i d e a f r a m e w o r k for evaluation of t h e effectiveness or w o r t h of an
activity: D i d it h e l p s t u d e n t s achieve o r m a k e p r o g r e s s t o w a r d t h e goals a n d objectives?
Clearly, t h e r e are m a n y r o u t e s (objectives) t o a given destination, s o m e m o r e circuitous than
o t h e r s , and t h e lengtli and n a t u r e of the r o u t e will d e p e n d on one's d e p a r t u r e p o i n t .
H o w d o e s o n e c h o o s e a p p r o p r i a t e goals and objectives? T h e r e is n o simple a n s w e r t o
this q u e s t i o n . To a r r i v e at t h e goals, o n e asks t h e q u e s t i o n , " W h a t are t h e p u r p o s e s a n d
182 KATHLEEN GRAVES
Issues
Conceptualizing content
What will be the backbone oJ what I teach? What will I include in my syllabus?
W h e n a t e a c h e r c o n c e p t u a l i z e s c o n t e n t , she is figuring o u t w h i c h aspects of language
and language l e a r n i n g she will include, emphasize, and i n t e g r a t e in h e r c o u r s e . This is n o t
the relatively simple process it o n c e w a s . T w o decades ago, language teacliing was still heavily
inHuenced by a s t r u c t u r a l view of language (Richards and R o d g e r s 1 9 8 6 ) . This i n f l u e n c e
r e s u l t e d in a " o n e size fits all" a p p r o a c h t o c o n t e n t and m e t h o d s , m e a n i n g that, f o r e x a m p l e ,
an EFL t e a c h e r c o u l d use the s a m e t e x t b o o k and t h e s a m e drills o r p a t t e r n p r a c t i c e f o r
f a c t o r y w o r k e r s , college s t u d e n t s , and h o u s e w i v e s . T h e r e was n o t m u c h q u e s t i o n a b o u t
c o n t e n t ; It was g r a m m a t i c a l s t r u c t u r e s and vocabulary.
M u c h has c h a n g e d in r e c e n t years in t h e fields of a p p l i e d linguistics a n d l a n g u a g e
acquisition and in a p p r o a c h e s t o language t e a c h i n g . T h e p r o f i c i e n c y m o v e m e n t , t h e c o n c e p t
and various m o d e l s of c o m m u n i c a t i v e c o m p e t e n c e , the advent of ESP (Enghsh f o r specific
p u r p o s e s ) , t h e p r o l i f e r a t i o n of m e t h o d s of language teaching, a n d t h e diversification of t h e
p o p u l a t i o n of English l e a r n e r s have all p r o v i d e d t h e t e a c h e r w i t h m a n y m o r e o p t i o n s t o
c o n s i d e r in d e c i d i n g w h a t will b e the b a c k b o n e of h e r c o u r s e (Canale 1 9 8 3 ; H u t c h i n s o n
and W a t e r s 1 9 8 7 ; O m a g g i o H a d l e y 1 9 9 3 ; R i c h a r d s 1 9 9 0 ; Savignon 1 9 8 3 ; Y a l d e n 1 9 8 7 ) .
N o w t h e c h o i c e s a t e a c h e r m a k e s are m u c h m o r e c o n t e x t - d e p e n d e n t a n d so involve a
n u m b e r of f a c t o r s such as w h o t h e s t u d e n t s are, t h e i r goals and e x p e c t a t i o n s in l e a r n i n g
English, t h e t e a c h e r ' s o w n c o n c e p t i o n of w h a t l a n g u a g e is a n d w h a t will b e s t m e e t t h e
s t u d e n t s ' n e e d s , t h e n a t u r e of t h e c o u r s e , and t h e institutional c u r r i c u l u m . A c o u r s e f o r
184 KATHLEEN GRAVES
T h e p r o f i c i e n c y m o v e m e n t a n d t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of p r o f i c i e n c y g u i d e l i n e s have
e m p h a s i z e d a f o u r - s k i l l s - b a s e d a p p r o a c h t o syllabus d e s i g n ( O m a g g i o Fiadley 1 9 9 3 ) . For
s o m e t e a c h e r s , t h e s e skills are a g i v e n , as s t u d e n t s have t o use s o m e c o m b i n a t i o n of speaking.
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 185
T h e e m p h a s i s on c o m m u n i c a t i v e c o m p e t e n c e as based o n and b r o u g h t a b o u t by
interaction has p r o m p t e d a view of language as n o t just s o m e t h i n g o n e learns b u t s o m e t h i n g
o n e Joc.'v. T h u s t e a c h e r s may conceive of t h e i r syllabus in t e r m s of w h a t t h e s t u d e n t s will d o
in the classroom as activities o r tasks.Tasks have b e e n variously d e f i n e d . P r a b h u ( 1 9 8 7 : 24)
d e f i n e s a task as an activity t h a t r e q u i r e s l e a r n e r s "to a r r i v e at an o u t c o m e f r o m g i v e n
i n f o r m a t i o n t h r o u g h s o m e proccss of t h o u g h t , " such as deciding o n an i t i n e r a r y b a s e d o n
train t i m e t a b l e s o r c o m p o s i n g a t e l e g r a m to send t o s o m e o n e . T a s k s have also b e e n d e f i n e d
as p r o j e c t s in which learners w o r k t o g e t h e r to p r o d u c e something, such as a p u t t i n g t o g e t h e r
a n e w s p a p e r o r c o n d u c t i n g a s u r v e y ( H u t c h i n s o n 1 9 8 4 ) . N u n a n ( 1 9 8 9 ) p r o p o s e s a task
c o n t i n u u m , w i t h r e a l - w o r l d tasks at o n e e n d and p e d a g o g i c tasks at t h e other. R e a l - w o r l d
tasks ask s t u d e n t s t o use language in wavs t h a t they m i g h t outside t h e c l a s s r o o m , such as
listening t o the radio, r e a d i n g the n e w s p a p e r , or using a train s c h e d u l e . Pedagogic tasks are
ones that w ould not o c c u r outside of the classroom but help students develop skills necessary
to f u n c t i o n in t h a t w o r l d , such as i n f o r m a t i o n gap activities.
T h e c o m p e t e n c y - b a s e d approach t o svllabus design was developed in the U n i t e d States
in r e s p o n s e t o the influx of i m m i g r a n t s in the 1970s and 1980s. It is a c o m b i n a t i o n of t h e
c o m m u n i c a t i v e and task-based a p p r o a c h e s and has b e e n u s e d in c o u r s e s f o r t e a c h i n g
i m m i g r a n t s , w h o have i m m e d i a t e n e e d s w i t h r e s p e c t to f u n c t i o n i n g in English in t h e
c o m m u n i t y and in the w o r k p l a c e . C o m p e t e n c i e s are "task-oriented goals w r i t t e n in t e r m s
of behavioral objectives that include language behavior" ( C e n t e r for Applied Linguistics 1983:
9 ) . T h e y arc the language and behavior necessary t o f u n c t i o n in situations related t o living in
the c o m m u n i t y and finding and m a i n t a i n i n g a job. C o m p e t e n c i e s r e l a t e d t o living in t h e
c o m m u n i t y have also b e e n called Iife-skills. Those related t o jobs have b e e n called vocational
skills. (See, for e x a m p l e , t h e California ESL M o d e l Standards f o r adult education 1 9 9 3 . )
H o w e v e r o n e defines t h e m , tasks can be g e a r e d t o one's specific g r o u p of l e a r n e r s . For
business p e r s o n n e l , ta^ks m i g h t include giving a business p r e s e n t a t i o n o r w r i t i n g a r e p o r t ;
for university s t u d e n t s , tasks m i g h t include w r i t i n g a r e s e a r c h p a p e r o r p r e p a r i n g a r e p o r t
f r o m n o t e s t a k e n at a l e c t u r e . W e can add t w o o t h e r categories t o o u r syllabus g r i d :
T h e r o l e of c u l t u r e in l a n g u a g e l e a r n i n g is r e c e i v i n g i n c r e a s i n g a t t e n t i o n . C u l t u r e
p r o v i d e s a b r o a d e r and d e e p e r c o n t c x t f o r h o w o n e k n o w s o r d e t e r m i n e s w h a t is v a l u e d ,
a p p r o p r i a t e , o r even feasible and why. D a m e n ( 1 9 8 6 ) calls c u l t u r e t h e "fifth d i m e n s i o n of
l a n g u a g e teaching." K r a m s c h ( 1 9 9 3 ) a s s e r t s t h a t c u l t u r e is n o t just a fifth skill o r even an
a s p e c t of c o m m u n i c a t i v e c o m p e t e n c e b u t t h e u n d e r l y i n g d i m e n s i o n of all o n e k n o w s and
d o e s . T h u s a t e a c h e r w h o v i e w s c u l t u r e as an i n t e g r a l p a r t of a syllabus m i g h t i n c l u d e t h e
d e v e l o p m e n t of a w a r e n e s s of t h e r o l e c u l t u r e plays in h u m a n i n t e r a c t i o n , h o w t o u n d e r s t a n d
a n d i n t e r p r e t t h e c u l t u r a l a s p e c t s of l a n g u a g e and behavior, and t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of skills
in b e h a v i n g and r e s p o n d i n g in c u l t u r a l l y a p p r o p r i a t e ways in a d d i t i o n t o k n o w l e d g e of the
target culture.
T h e l e a r n i n g of l a n g u a g e t h r o u g h o r in c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h s u b j e c t m a t t e r can also b e t h e
f o c u s of a language c o u r s e . Such c o u r s e s ha\ e b e e n called conr201:6(1.^i^ecause thevLlntcgrate
" p a r t i c u l a r c o n t e n t w i t h l a n g u a g e t e a c h i n g aims" ( B r i n t o n , Snow, and W e s c h e 1 9 8 9 ) . Such
c o n t e n t may be school- or work-related lor e x a m p l e , historv, e c o n o m i c s , or c o m p u t e r
t e c h n o l o g y . A c o n t e n t - b a s e d c o u r s e m a v t e a c h t h e s u b j e c t m a t t e r d i r e c t l y o r use s u b j e c t
m a t t e r as t h e basis f o r l a n g u a g e - l e a r n i n g lessons. T h u s t h e t a r g e t l a n g u a g e can b e b o t h a
m e a n s f o r a n d a b y - p r o d u c t of l e a r n i n g t h e s u b j e c t m a t t e r . C o n t e n t - b a s e d a p p r o a c h e s plav
a critical r o l e in bilingual p r o g r a m s f o r c h i l d r e n as well as in ESP c o u r s e s a n d , increasingly,
in E A P c o u r s e s . W e can add c u l t u r e and c o n t e n t t o o u r svllabus g r i d :
Content
A n o t h e r m a j o r c h a n g e in h o w t e a c h e r s c o n c e p t u a l i z e c o n t e n t has c o m e a b o u t b e c a u s e ol
t h e v i e w t h a t o n e t e a c h e s l e a r n e r s , n o t j u s t l a n g u a g e . T h e e m p h a s i s o n t h e l e a r n e r has
i n t r o d u c e d o t h e r i m p o r t a n t e l e m e n t s i n t o a t e a c h e r ' s c o n c e p t i o n of w h a t she will t e a c h :
t h e l e a r n e r ' s a f f e c t , w^hich i n c l u d e s a t t i t u d e s , s e l f - c o n f i d e n c e , a n d m o t i v a t i o n , and t h e
learner's approach to learning, which includes both understanding and developing one's
l e a r n i n g skills. H o w t o i m p r o v e l e a r n e r s ' s e l f - c o n f i d e n c e o r h e l p i n g l e a r n e r s b e c o m e a w a r e
of t h e i r a t t i t u d e t o w a r d t h e t a r g e t c u l t u r e may b e explicitly i n c l u d e d in a syllabus, as may
activities t h a t h e l p l e a r n e r s b e c o m e a w a r e of t h e i r s t r e n g t h s and o v e r c o m e t h e i r w e a k n e s s e s
as l e a r n e r s . T h e d e v e l o p m e n t of definitions, t a x o n o m i e s , and m e t h o d s of d e v e l o p i n g learning
s t r a t e g i e s is o n e w a y in w h i c h t h e e m p h a s i s o n h e l p i n g l e a r n e r s b e c o m e s e l f - a w a r e has
i n f l u e n c e d syllabus d e s i g n ( O ' M a l l e y a n d C h a m o t 1 9 9 0 ; O x f o r d 1 9 9 0 ) .
F o r s o m e t e a c h e r s , e n a b l i n g s t u d e n t s t o p a r t i c i p a t e in d e t e r m i n i n g t h e c o n t e n t of t h e i r
c o u r s e so t h a t w h a t t h e y d o in class gives t h e m t h e t o o l s t o c o p e w i t h a n d c h a n g e w h a t tliey
w i l l e n c o u n t e r o u t s i d e of t h e c l a s s r o o m is t h e f o c u s of t h e i r c o u r s e . T h u s t h e y ask t h e
l e a r n e r s t o e n g a g e in p a r t i c i p a t o r y p r o c e s s e s t h a t h e l p t h e m u n d e r s t a n d t h e s p j d a L c o n t e x t
of t h e i r p r o b l e m s and t a k e c o n t r o l of t h e i r p e r s o n a l a n d p r o f e s s i o n a l lives t h r o u g h w o r k in
t h e c l a s s r o o m ( A u e r b a c h 1 9 9 3 ; A u e r b a c h and W a l l e r s t e i n 1 9 8 7 ) . W e can n o w add t w o m o r e
c a t e g o r i e s t o the_s_yllabus g r i d , l e a r n i n g s t r a t e g i e s a n d p a r t i c i p a t o r y p r o c e s s e s . T h e
c o m p l e t e d g r i d is s h o w n in F i g u r e 1 5 . 1 .
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 187
Issues
T e a c h i n g i n v o l v e s m a k i n g c h o i c e s . It is n o t p o s s i b l e t o t e a c h a s y l l a b u s t h a t e x p l i c i t l y
e n c o m p a s s e s all t h e a r e a s m e n t i o n e d h e r e so t e a c h e r s m u s t d e c i d e w h i c h c a t e g o r i e s m a k e
s e n s e t o t h e m f o r a g i v e n c o u r s e . T h e c a t e g o r i e s also o v e r l a p , b o t h c o n c e p t u a l l y a n d i n t h e
c l a s s r o o m . F o r e x a m p l e , p r o n u n c i a t i o n is an i m p o r t a n t p a r t of s p e a k i n g skills. V o c a b u l a r y
d e v e l o p m e n t is a p a r t of n o t i o n s a n d t o p i c s . L e a r n i n g s t r a t e g i e s c a n b e l i n k e d t o s p e c i f i c
skills. S o m e of tlie c a t e g o r i e s a r e vast a n d c a n b e d i v i d e d i n t o s e v e r a l s u b c a t e g o r i e s . M a n y
r e a d e r s w i l l find t h a t t h e y w o u l d l a b e l o r d e f i n e tlie c a t e g o r i e s d i f f e r e n t l y o r t h a t c e r t a i n
categories are missing. For e x a m p l e , s o m e t e a c h e r s conceptualize c o n t e n t thematically.
T e a c h e r s of c o u r s e s w h o s e c o n t e n t has a l r e a d y b e e n s p e c i f i e d w i l l f a c e d i f f e r e n t i s s u e s .
T h e y m a y find t h a t t h e b r e a d t h of c o n t e n t is u n r e a l i s t i c f o r t h e a m o u n t of t i m e t h e y h a v e t o
t e a c h it o r t h a t t h e w a y c o n t e n t h a s b e e n d e f i n e d is i n a p p r o p r i a t e , i n t h e i r v i e w , f o r t h e
p u r p o s e s o f t h e c o u r s e . T h e o v e r l a p p i n g n a t u r e of t h e c a t e g o r i e s m a y b e a n aid in finding
w a y s t o a d a p t t h e e x i s t i n g c o n t e n t t o t h e i r v i s i o n of t h e c o u r s e .
Selecting a n d d e v e l o p i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d activities
How and with what will I teach the course? What is my role? What are my students' roles?
For many teachers, course d e v e l o p m e n t starts n o t with d e t e r m i n i n g objectives or
188 KATHLEEN GRAVES
conccptualizinij c o n t e n t hut with ideas about the c o u r s e in action. They think about material
they will use, activities their s t u d e n t s will d o , technic|ues they will employ, i'hey think about
the way tliey w a n t tlieir s t u d e n t s t o learn and t h e i r o w n role in the c l a s s r o o m .
For m a n y t e a c h e r s , t h e m a t e r i a l they use f o r m s t h e b a c k b o n e of t h e c o u r s e . It is
s o m e t h i n a c o n c r e t e that s t u d e n t s use, and it proyides a focus for the class. Choosing material
may m e a n d e v e l o p m e n t of n e w m a t e r i a l w h e n t e a c h i n g a c o u r s e for yyhich t h e r e are n o
suitable m a t e r i a l s , collecting a x'ariety of materials, o r a d a p t i n g existing materials. Teachcrs
c o n s i d e r a variety of factors in d e v e l o p i n g , c h o o s i n g , o r adapting materials. T w o of the m o s t
i m p o r t a n t are t h e i r e f f e c t i v e n e s s in a c h i e v i n g t h e p u r p o s e s of t h e c o u r s e and t h e i r
a p p r o p r i a t e n e s s f o r t h e s t u d e n t s — and t h e t e a c h e r . A p p r o p r i a t e n e s s includes s t u d e n t
c o m f o r t and familiarity w i t h t h e m a t e r i a l , language l e \ e l , i n t e r e s t , and r e l e v a n c e . S o m e
t e a c h e r s i n c o r p o r a t e i n s t r u c t i o n in h o w t o use unfamiliar materials as p a r t of their c o u r s e
design. Feasibility and availability are also i m p o r t a n t t o consider.
D e v e l o p i n g n e w m a t e r i a l s and activities for using t h e m r e q u i r e s t i m e and a clear sense
of w h y tliey will b e u s e d , how, and by w h o m . Because of the lack of t i m e , t e a c h e r s are o f t e n
c o n s t r a i n e d o r p r e f e r t o adapt existing materials. E x p e r i e n c e d t e a c h e r s o f t e n dev elop a set
of c o r e m a t e r i a l s and activities that thev adapt each t i m e they t e a c h a c o u r s e . T h e materials
tltemselves are flexible and can be used in a n u m b e r of ways, d e p e n d i n g on the target skills
o r c o m p e t e n c i e s . For e x a m p l e , n e w s p a p e r articles can be used as a basis for d e v e l o p i n g
r e a d i n g skills, e x p a n d i n g vocabulary, o r discussing c u l t u r e . Pictures can be used as a focus
for l e a r n i n g g r a m m a r o r as a s t a r t i n g p o i n t for a w r i t i n g a s s i g n m e n t . C o r e activ ities are
r e l a t e d t o t h e way t h e t e a c h e r c o n c e p t u a l i z e s the c o n t e n t . A t e a c h e r may have a r e p e r t o i r e
of activities f o r t e a c h i n g p r o n u n c i a t i o n o r f o r having s t u d e n t s learn t o u n d e r s t a n d cultural
d i f f e r e n c e s . For s o m e t e a c h e r s , m a t e r i a l s and activities are i n t e g r a t e d into a m e t h o d , such
as t h e "language e x p e r i e n c e " a p p r o a c h (Rigg 1 9 8 9 ) . T h e emphasis on p r o h c i e n c y and learn-
ing language in c o n t e x t has led m a n y t e a c h e r s t o use as m u c h a u t h e n t i c material as possible
in t h e i r classes ( O m a g g i o Hadley 1 9 9 3 ) . For c o n t e n t - b a s e d c o u r s e s , a u t h e n t i c m a t e r i a l is
the foundation.
For t e a c h e r s w h o are r e q u i r e d t o use a c e r t a i n t e x t , c o u r s e d e v e l o p m e n t is the
a d a p t a t i o n of t h e t e x t , f o r d i e c o n t e n t of the t e x t d e t e r m i n e s t h e c o n t e n t oi the c o u r s e .
H o w e v e r , the t e x t is n o t t h e c o u r s e ; rather, w h a t the t e a c h e r and s t u d e n t s d o w i t h the t e x t
c o n s t i t u t e s t h e c o u r s e . T e x t b o o k s are tools that can be figurativ ely cut u p i n t o c o m p o n e n t
pieces and t h e n r e a r r a n g e d t o suit t h e n e e d s , abilities, and i n t e r e s t s of t h e s t u d e n t s in the
c o u r s e . T h e m a t e r i a l in a t e x t b o o k can be m o d i f i e d t o i n c o r p o r a t e activities t h a t will
m o t i v a t e s t u d e n t s and m o v e t h e m b e y o n d the constraints of the t e x t . Das ( 1 9 8 8 : viii) points
out that materials should not "pre-specify learning o u t c o m e s or a t t e m p t to control or
substantially g u i d e learning: their f u n c t i o n is primarily t o provide o p p o r t u n i t i e s for learning
through interaction."
T h e q u e s t i o n "Flow will I teach?" also e n c o m p a s s e s a t e a c h e r ' s a p p r o a c h and h o w she
v i e w s h e r r o l e and t h a t of t h e l e a r n e r s . H o w m u c h initiative will t h e s t u d e n t s b e e x p e c t e d
t o take, and t o w a r d w h a t e n d ? H o w will t h e s t u d e n t s be asked t o i n t e r a c t P T h e emphasis on
l e a r n e r a w a r e n e s s and c o n c e r n for e x t e n d i n g l e a r n i n g b e y o n d t h e c l a s s r o o m have m a d e the
r o l e of t h e l e a r n e r a c e n t r a l focus of h o w a c o u r s e is t a u g h t . Teachers design c o u r s e s w i t h
activities and m a t e r i a l s t h a t have the s t u d e n t s take a m o r e active role in reflecting on their
l e a r n i n g , d e t e r m i n i n g t h e c o n t e n t of t h e c o u r s e , and p u r s u i n g p r o j e c t s of i n t e r e s t t o t h e m .
Such an a p p r o a c h m a y facilitate t h e search for m a t e r i a l s in t h a t the emphasis is n o t o n t h e
materials themselves but on what the students do with t h e m .
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 189
Issues
For s o m e t e a c h e r s , t h e lack ol m a t e r i a l s is a c h a l l e n g e ; f o r o t h e r s , it is an o p p o r t u n i t y .
D e v e l o p i n g m a t e r i a l s requires t i m e b e f o r e , d u r i n g , and a f t e r the c o u r s e — f o r p r e p a r i n g ,
using, and m o d i f y i n g t h e m , respectively. Yet having t o use c e r t a i n m a t e r i a l s m a y p r o d u c e
the d i l e m m a of c o p i n g with a t e x t that does n o t m e e t s t u d e n t s ' n e e d s o r does n o t p r o m o t e
the t e a c h e r ' s view of t h e r o l e s ol l e a r n e r s and t e a c h e r s . O t h e r aspects of c o u r s e
d e v e l o p m e n t , such as n e e d s assessment and objective setting, may h e l p t h e t e a c h e r see h o w
to a d a p t unsuitable materials and t o w h a t e x t e n t . Eventually, all m a t e r i a l s are a d a p t e d o r
m o d i f i e d in s o m e way. Even m a t e r i a l s that have b e e n d e v e l o p e d by t e a c h e r s f o r specific
c o u r s e s will be modified over t i m e .
Issues
Evaluation
How will I assess what students have learned? How will I assess the effectiveness of the course?
For m o s t t e a c h e r s , evaluation m e a n s evaluation within t h e c o u r s e ; assessing s t u d e n t s '
proficiency, p r o g r e s s , o r a c h i e v e m e n t . H o w p r o f i c i e n t are s t u d e n t s in listening? Are s t u d e n t s
i m p r o v i n g t h e i r w r i t i n g skills? Have they l e a r n e d t o f u n c t i o n in English in t h e w o r k p l a c e ?
Teachers build in s o m e f o r m of s t u d e n t evaluation w h e n d e v e l o p i n g a c o u r s e , r a n g i n g f r o m
f o r m a l tests t o i n f o r m a l assessments. H u g h e s ( 1 9 8 9 ) discusses f o u r p u r p o s e s f o r testing: t o
m e a s u r e proficiency, t o diagnose specific s t r e n g t h s and w e a k n e s s e s , t o place s t u d e n t s in a
c o u r s e o r p r o g r a m , and t o assess t h e i r a c h i e v e m e n t in a c o u r s e or p r o g r a m . T h e same testing
i n s t i ' u m e h t m a y b e u$ed f o r m o r e than o n e p u r p o s e . For e x a m p l e , t h e T O E F L test is used
by g r a d u a t e p r o g r a m s in t h e U n i t e d States as a p r o f i c i e n c y t e s t , b u t it is s o m e t i m e s u s e d as
an a c h i e v e m e n t t e s t if s t u d e n t s s h o w a gain o n a T O E F L p o s t t e s t . H o w e v e r , tests are n o t the
only m e a n s t e a c h e r s have t o assess t h e i r s t u d e n t s . Teachers m a y s t r u c t u r e t h e i r classroom
activities so t h a t they can assess t h e i r s t u d e n t s while the s t u d e n t s p a r t i c i p a t e . T h e y may use
a p o r t f o l i o a p p r o a c h , in w h i c h s t u d e n t s p u t t o g e t h e r a p o r t f o l i o of t h e i r w o r k ( F i n g e r e t
1 9 9 3 ) . T h e y m a y involve t h e i r s t u d e n t s in d e c i d i n g w h a t should be assessed and h o w (Hull
1991).
Evaluation in c o u r s e d e v e l o p m e n t also includes evaluation of t h e c o u r s e itself. Was the
c o u r s e effective? In w h a t ways? W h e r e did it fall s h o r t ? Such an e v a l u a t i o n m a y n o t b e
directly linked t o assessment of s t u d e n t progress, although s t u d e n t evaluation and test results
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 191
Issues
C o n s i d e r a t i o n of r e s o u r c e s a n d c o n s t r a i n t s
What are the givens ^mj situation?
R e s o u r c e s and c o n s t r a i n t s a r e t w o ways oF l o o k i n g at t h e s a m e thing. A r e q u i r e d c o u r s e
b o o k m a y b e a c o n s t r a i n t For o n e t e a c h e r and a r e s o u r c e For a n o t h e r . A class oF Fewer t h a n
t e n s t u d e n t s m a y b e a r e s o u r c e For o n e t e a c h e r a n d a c o n s t r a i n t For a n o t h e r . T h o u g h t h e s e
g i v e n s m a y s e e m s e c o n d a r y t o t h e p r o c e s s e s j u s t d e s c r i b e d , in Fact they play a p r i m a r y r o l e
in tlie d e v e l o p m e n t of a c o u r s e b e c a u s e it is in c o n s i d e r i n g d i e g i v e n s t h a t a t e a c h e r b e g i n s
t o m a k e s e n s e o F p r o c e s s e s s u c h as n e e d s a s s e s s m e n t and m a t e r i a l s e l e c t i o n . I have r e t e r r e d
t o this e l s e w h e r e ( 1 9 9 6 ) as p r o b l e n i a t i z i n g : d e f i n i n g t h e c h a l l e n g e s o F o n e ' s situation so that
o n e can m a k e d e c i s i o n s a b o u t w h a t t o d o . In t h e a b s e n c e oF p r o b l e m a t i z i n g , a t e a c h e r niav
seek to graft solutions a p p r o p r i a t e to a n o t h e r unique situation o n t o her situation. This
b e c a m e clear t o m e in t h e case of an EFL t e a c h e r w h o faced an e x t r a o r d i n a r v c h a l l e n g e :
d e s i g n i n g a c o n v e r s a t i o n class f o r 1 4 0 s t u d e n t s in a s p a c e m e a n t f o r half as nianv. She felt
t h a t h a v i n g e x a m p l e s of n e e d s analysis q u e s t i o n n a i r e s w o u l d b e a key t o d e v e l o p i n g h e r
c o u r s e . To m e , this w a s an e x a m p l e of a t e a c h e r seeking a n s w e r s f r o m o u t s i d e w i t h o u t having
f i r s t specifically d e f i n e d t h e c h a l l e n g e s of h e r o w n s i t u a t i o n . S u c h p r o b l e m a t i z i n g c o u l d
e v e n t u a l l y r e s u l t in an e x a m i n a t i o n of h o w o t h e r s a p p r o a c h e d n e e d s analysis as an aid in
d e v e l o p i n g h e r o w n . H e r e is a s k e t c h of o n e way of p r o b l e m a t i z i n g tliis t e a c h e r ' s s i t u a t i o n ;
• This is a conversation class, but there are 140 students in a space that Jits 70. I n e e d t o look
at ways of w o r k i n g w i t h i n d i e c o n s t r a i n t s of t h e c l a s s r o o m s u c h as ways t o g r o u p o r
rotate students.
• What kinds of conversations can 140 students possibly have? I n e e d t o assess t h e i r language
abihty (At what level can they carry on a conversation?) and find o u t a b o u t t h e i r b a c k g r o u n d
a n d i n t e r e s t s (Wiat can they have conversations about?). H o w will I g o a b o u t d o i n g that?
W h a t k i n d s of q u e s t i o n s s h o u l d I ask t h e m ? If t h e a s s e s s m e n t s h o w s t h a t t h e i r ability
is low, I n e e d t o f o c u s o n t h e k i n d of p r e p a r a t i o n a n d f o u n d a t i o n w o r k n e c e s s a r y f o r
conversations t o take place.
• How can I get them to work together to have these conversations? C l a s s r o o m m a n a g e m e n t is
an issue. I n e e d t o l o o k at available m a t e r i a l s w i d i c a r e f u l l y s t r u c t u r e d activities as a
m e a n s of c l a s s r o o m m a n a g e m e n t . O r p e r h a p s I c o u l d ask o t h e r t e a c h e r s w h a t has
w o r k e d f o r t h e m in this s i t u a t i o n .
• How can I monitor their activity? I n e e d t o e x a m i n e m y r o l e in t h e c l a s s r o o m . I also n e e d
t o t h i n k a b o u t t h e t y p e s of m o n i t o r i n g a n d e v a l u a t i o n m e c h a n i s m s I will u s e in t h e
class.
• What has worked in the past? I n e e d t o t h i n k a b o u t t h e activities o r classes in w h i c h I f e l t
t h a t t h i n g s w e n t w e l l . W h y d i d t h e y g o well? W h a t can I t a k e f r o m t h o s e successes and
b u i l d i n t o this c o u r s e ?
T h e s e a r e q u e s t i o n s t h a t I p r o p o s e . W e r e t h e t e a c h e r t o g o t h r o u g h a similar p r o c e s s ,
she m i g h t ask d i f f e r e n t o n e s o r r e s p o n d t o t h e s a m e o n e s in d i f f e r e n t ways b e c a u s e of h e r
i n t i m a t e k n o w l e d g e of h e r c o n t e x t a n d h e r r o l e in it. For e x a m p l e , h o w s t u d e n t s are g r a d e d ,
w h e t h e r t h e r e is a r e q u i r e d t e x t , , a n d a t t e n d a n c e p a t t e r n s w o u l d all i n f l u e n c e t h e k i n d s of
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 193
Issues
T h e givens of o n e ' s t e a c h i n g s i t u a t i o n , b o t h t a n g i b l e a n d i n t a n g i b l e , c a n n o t b e i g n o r e d .
Effecting change r e q u i r e s botlr recognizing w h a t can be changed and accepting w h a t c a n n o t .
T h e "If only . . ." s y n d r o m e (if only w e had tlie technology, if only w e had quieter classrooms,
if only o u r s t u d e n t s w e r e m o r e m o t i v a t e d ) can o b s t r u c t c h a n g e as f i r m l y as t h e "Yes,
194 KATHLEEN GRAVES
Conclusion
T h e c o m p o n e n t s discussed in tliis c h a p t e r a n d s u m m a r i z e d in Table 15.1 s h o u l d s e r v e n o t
as a c h e c k l i s t f o r tlie t e a c h e r b u t r a t h e r as a set of t o o l s f o r t a l k i n g a b o u t , u n d e r s t a n d i n g ,
and d i r e c t i n g t h e p r o c e s s of c o u r s e d e v e l o p m e n t . Each c o m p o n e n t is c o n t i n g e n t o n e v e r y
other c o m p o n e n t . For example, assessment depends on h o w o n e conceptualizes c o n t e n t or
o n h o w she i n t e r p r e t s s t u d e n t s ' n e e d s . C o n c e p t u a l i z i n g c o n t e n t in t u r n influences d i e c o u r s e
g o a l s a n d o b j e c t i v e s . T h u s w h e r e v e r o n e s t a r t s in t h e p r o c e s s , e a c h c o m p o n e n t will
e v e n t u a l l y c o m e i n t o play. Each c o m p o n e n t is, in m a n y r e s p e c t s , o n e way of w o r k i n g w i t h
tine w h o l e .
Note
1 T h e t e r m s needs analysis and needs assessment arc o f t e n used interchangeably. But as Susan
P o m e r o y once suggested t o m e , they r e f e r t o separate processes: Assessment involves
obtaining data, w h e r e a s analysis involves assigning value t o those data.
References
A u e r b a c h , E. 1993. " P u t t i n g t h e p back in participatory." T E S O L Quarterly 2 7 (3): 543—545.
A u e r b a c h , E. and N. Wallerstein. 1987. ESLjor Action: Problem Posing at Work. Reading, Mass.:
Addison-Wesley.
Blyth, M . d. C. 1996. "Designing an EAP c o u r s e for p o s t g r a d u a t e s t u d e n t s in Ecuador." In K.
Graves, e d . . Teachers as Course Developers. C a m b r i d g e : C a m b r i d g e University Press.
Brindley, G. 1989. " T h e role of n e e d s analysis in adult ESL p r o g r a m design." In R. K. J o h n s o n ,
e d . . The Second Language Curriculum, pp. 63—78. C a m b r i d g e : C a m b r i d g e University Press.
B r i n t o n , D. M . , M . A, Snow, and M . B.Wesche. 1989. Content-based Second Language Instruction.
Rowley, Mass.: N e w b u r y H o u s e .
B r o w n , J. D. 1989. "Language p r o g r a m evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities." In
R . K. J o h n s o n , e d . . The Second Language Curricuhim, pp. 222—243. C a m b r i d g e :
C a m b r i d g e University Press.
California D e p a r t m e n t of Education. 1993. English as a Second Language Model Standards/or Adult
Education. Sacramento.
Canale, M . 1983. " F r o m c o m m u n i c a t i v e c o m p e t e n c e t o c o m m u n i c a t i v e language pedagogy."
In J. Richards and R. Schmidt, eds., Language and Communication, pp. 2—27. L o n d o n :
Longman.
C e n t e r f o r Applied Linguistics. 1983. From the Classroom to theWorkplace:Teaching ESL to Adults.
Washington, D.C.
Clark, C. and P. P e t e r s o n . 1986. "Teachers' t h o u g h t processes." In M . W i t t r o c k , e d . . Handbook
of Research onTeaching. 3rd e d . , pp. 255—297. N e w York: Macmillan.
D a m e n , L. 1987. Culture Learning:The Fifth Dimension in the Language Classroom. Reading, Mass.:
Addison-Wesley.
Das, B. K. 1988. Materials for Language Learning and Teaching. Singapore: S E A M E O Regional
Language C e n t r e .
D u b i n , F. and E. Olshtain. 1986. Course Design: Developing Programs and Materials for Language
Learning. N e w York: C a m b r i d g e University Press.
Fingeret, A. F. 1993. It Belongs to Me:A Guide to Porfolio Assessment in Adult Education Programs.
D u r h a m , N. C.: Literacy South.
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 195
Tarone, E. and G.Yule 1989. Focus on the Language Learner. N e w York: O x f o r d University Press.
Van Ek, J . A . 1975. Threshold-level English. O x f o r d : P e r g a m o n Press.
W h i t e , R. V. 1988. The ELT Curricuhim: Design Innovation and Management. O x f o r d : Blackvvell.
Wilkins, D. A. 1976. Notional Sjllabuses. O x f o r d : O x f o r d University Press.
Yalden, J. 1987. The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design and Implementation. London:
Prentice-Hall International.