Colombo SCR+PGM ASC Kinetics
Colombo SCR+PGM ASC Kinetics
Experimental and modeling study of a dual-layer (SCR + PGM) NH3 slip monolith
catalyst (ASC) for automotive SCR aftertreatment systems. Part 1. Kinetics for the
PGM component and analysis of SCR/PGM interactions
Massimo Colombo a , Isabella Nova a , Enrico Tronconi a,∗ , Volker Schmeißer b ,
Brigitte Bandl-Konrad b , Lisa Zimmermann c
a
Dipartimento di Energia, Laboratorio di Catalisi e Processi Catalitici, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milano, Italy
b
Daimler AG, 019-G206 RD/RPE, 70546 Stuttgart, Germany
c
Daimler AG, 019-D121 TP/PME, 70546 Stuttgart, Germany
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: We present herein the first of two parts in the development and validation of a chemically and physically
Received 28 July 2012 consistent mathematical model of a commercial dual-layer (SCR + PGM) monolithic NH3 slip converter
Received in revised form 17 October 2012 (ASC). The overall project followed a systematic approach of growing complexity, and its results empha-
Accepted 29 October 2012
size the beneficial features of a dual-layer configuration with the SCR catalyst on top of the PGM
Available online 12 November 2012
component. Specifically, we report in this paper NH3 /O2 /NO NO2 steady-state and transient kinetic
runs performed over the PGM component of the dual-layer NH3 slip catalyst. The PGM component was
Keywords:
tested in a representative temperature range (150–550 ◦ C) in the form of precursor washcoat powders at
Urea SCR
Ammonia slip
high space velocities in order to gain kinetic information. From these data an original global PGM kinetic
ASC model was developed, which fully accounts for the effects of temperature and of NO2 /NOx feed ratio (0–1)
Zeolite catalysts on NH3 oxidation. The model considers NO2 inhibition on NO oxidation, as well as a novel NO2 inhibition
Diesel exhaust aftertreatment effect on the NH3 oxidation reactions. Comparative NH3 /O2 /NO NO2 steady-state runs were performed
also over two combinations of SCR + PGM powders (sequential double-bed and mechanical mixture). The
N2 selectivity was greater over the mechanical mixture, as in this configuration the unselective NH3 oxi-
dation products (NOx ) formed over the PGM catalyst had a chance to further react selectively with NH3
over the SCR catalyst. Such a positive interaction between the PGM and the SCR catalytic chemistries was
satisfactorily predicted by a model involving the simple superposition of the PGM and SCR kinetics. In the
following part of the project the herein developed PGM kinetics, together with consistent SCR kinetics,
will be incorporated in a novel dual-layer monolith catalyst model and validated against both lab-scale
and engine test bench data collected over dual-layer ASC systems.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0926-3373/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.10.031
862 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
The NH3 adsorption/desorption on the PGM catalytic system was z = reactor axial coordinate (m); Ri = rate of formation of ith species,
instead studied by isothermal Transient Response (TRM) runs (NH3 computed according to:
step feed) followed by Temperature Programmed Desorption (TPD)
experiments. Typical feed concentrations of NOx and NH3 ranged
NR
between 0 and 1000 ppm, always in the presence of O2 (8%, v/v), Ri = rk · vi,k (7)
H2 O (8%, v/v) and balance He. The system was operated at atmo-
k=1
spheric pressure with a Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV) in the
range 325,000–1,093,000 cm3 /h gcat (STP). A detailed description
where rk is the rate of reaction k and i,k is the stoichiometric coef-
of the experimental equipment and procedures can be found else-
ficient of species i in reaction k;
where [13].
˝j = catalyst adsorption capacity of adsorbed species j
Experimental results are frequently presented in the paper in
(mol/m3cat );
terms of NH3 conversion and products yields, calculated according
j = surface coverage of adsorbed species j (−).
to the following equations:
The rate parameters included in the adopted reaction rates were
estimated by global multiresponse non-linear regressions based on
NHin out
3 − NH3
NH3 conversion = · 100 (1) the least squares method. For this purpose the BURENL routine,
NHin
3 developed by Prof. Guido Buzzi-Ferraris, has been used [15,16].
As described in the “Methods” section, the interaction between
2 · Nout
2
SCR and PGM components of the ASC system was studied in two dif-
N2 yield =
in
· 100 (2) ferent reactor configurations named “Double Bed” and “Mechanical
NHin
3 + NOx Mixture”. PGM/SCR “Double Bed” reactor simulations were based
on the sequential implementation of SCR and PGM kinetics within
NOout
x the just described reactor model, where the SCR kinetics were those
NOx yield = · 100 (3)
published in [3]. In view of the arrangement of the catalytic beds
NH3 in
+ NOin
x
(SCR catalyst followed by the PGM catalyst), the output of the SCR
layer simulation was used as the input for the simulation with the
2 · N2 Oout
N2 O yield =
in
· 100 (4) PGM model.
NHin
3 + NOx On the opposite, the simulation of the kinetic data collected
over the SCR/PGM “Mechanical Mixture” configuration called for
a dedicated model accounting for the simultaneous presence of
2.2. Reactor model two different active phases in different amounts. Again, a hetero-
geneous one-dimensional plug-flow dynamic reactor model that
In analogy with the approach used for the SCR component assumes the catalytic bed to be isothermal and isobaric has been
of the ASC [3], experimental data collected over the powdered employed. Perfect mixing and homogeneous distribution of the two
PGM catalyst have been analyzed according to a heterogeneous active phases were assumed, resulting in the following unsteady
one-dimensional dynamic plug-flow reactor model, assuming the differential material balance equations for adsorbed and gaseous
catalyst bed to be isothermal and isobaric. species:
The model is based upon the following unsteady material bal-
ance differential equations for gaseous and adsorbed species [14]:
∂jSCR
SCR adsorbed phase : ˝jSCR = −(1 − ) · RjSCR (8)
∂Ci ∂C ∂t
gaseous phase : ε = −v i + (1 − ε)Ri (5)
∂t ∂z
∂jPGM
∂ PGM adsorbed phase : ˝jPGM = − · RjPGM (9)
adsorbed phase : ˝j i = Ri (6) ∂t
∂t
where ε = void fraction of catalyst bed (−); Ci = gas-phase con- ∂Ci ∂Ci
Gas phase : ε = − · + (1 − ε) RiTOT (10)
centration of ith species (mol/m3 ); v = gas linear velocity (m/s); ∂t ∂z
864 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
100 100
90 A 90 B
80 80
70 70
NH3 conversion, %
60 60
N2 yield, %
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
90 C 90 D
80 80
70 70
NOx yield, %
60 60
N2O yield, %
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 2. NH3 oxidation on PGM catalyst: NH3 = 500 ppm; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
where: or 1000 ppm of NH3 in the presence of water (8%, v/v) and balance
helium, was followed by a temperature ramp in order to complete
nr-SCR
nr-PGM
RiTOT = (1 − ) · i,k rkSCR + · i,k rkPGM (11) ammonia desorption (TPD).
The experiment (see Fig. A in Supplementary material) showed
k=1 k=1
no evidence of ammonia adsorption onto the catalyst surface dur-
VPGM−CAT ing the transient phase. Additionally, the ammonia signal stayed at
= (12)
VTOT−CAT zero ppm throughout the TPD run, indicating no detectable release
VTOT−CAT = VSCR−CAT + VPGM−CAT (13) of ammonia stored during the adsorption phase. However, the lack
of a detectable storage capacity for ammonia (at least under the
Applying the general equations (Eqs. (5)–(7)) (or (Eqs. (8)–(13)) studied conditions) does not rule out the adsorption of the same
to the relevant chemical species present in the reacting system, a species on the catalyst surface:
system of partial differential equations (PDE) is obtained. A dedi-
cated FORTRAN code has been used for numerical integration of the NH3 + ∗ ↔ NH3 ∗ (R.1)
PDE system according to the method of lines. The discretization of
the variables along the axial coordinate was based on finite differ- Indeed, literature reviews on the ammonia oxidation mech-
ences (FD), using typically a grid with 31 equispaced points. The anism over PGM catalysts report the unanimous acceptance
resulting system of ordinary differential equations was then inte- of reaction steps which consider adsorption of both reactant
grated over time using the LSODI library routine, based on Gear’s molecules (NH3 and O2 ) [17]. Moreover, there is general agreement
method for stiff ODEs. that ammonia adsorbs in on-top position on Pt [18] and that such
an adsorption is a non-activated process.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Identification of the reaction network over the PGM catalyst 3.1.2. NH3 O2
Upon feeding both ammonia and oxygen to the reactor, NH3
3.1.1. NH3 adsorption–desorption oxidation is expected to proceed, as already widely reported in
The ammonia adsorption and desorption properties of the PGM literature [10,17–19]. N2 , N2 O and NOx were identified as main oxi-
catalyst have been investigated by transient two-stage runs: a TRM dation products, with selectivity being a function of the noble metal
run at constant temperature (namely 150 ◦ C), stepwise feeding 500 content and of the catalyst temperature.
M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876 865
550 550
Experimental data 550
500 500
Thermodyn. Eq. 500
450 450 NO 450
T
400 NO 400 400
Concentration, ppm
350
NO
350
Temperature, °C
350
Concentration, ppm
250 250
250
200
200 200 T
150
150 150
100
NO2 100
100 NO2 50
50
NO2
50 0
0 -50
0
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
-50 Time, s
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Temperature, °C
Fig. 4. NO oxidation on PGM catalyst, transient runs: NO = 500 ppm; H2 O = 8%
(v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
Fig. 3. NO oxidation on PGM catalyst, steady state data: NO = 500 ppm; H2 O = 8%
(v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
giving NO2 as the only reaction product and reaching a maximum
consumption of about 300 ppm around 350 ◦ C.
Fig. 2 shows the results collected during steady-state NH3 oxida-
It is well known in literature [20] that noble metals are active in
tion runs performed over the PGM catalyst sample. The feed stream
the oxidation of NO according to the reversible reaction:
consisted of 500 ppm ammonia in the presence of water (8%, v/v),
oxygen (8%, v/v) and balance helium. In Fig. 2A the NH3 conversion NO + 1/2O2 ↔ NO2 (R.5)
is plotted versus the catalyst temperature, while Fig. 2B–D show
and the concentration traces in Fig. 3 are consistent with the stoi-
respectively the N2 , NOx (NO + NO2 ) and N2 O yields for the same
chiometry reported above. Since reaction (R.5) is reversible, the
tests.
theoretical concentration levels of NO and NO2 calculated accord-
Focusing first on NH3 conversion (Fig. 2A), a steep reaction light-
ing to the thermodynamic equilibrium constraints are also shown
off was observed between 200 ◦ C and 225 ◦ C, with NH3 reaching
in Fig. 3 (dashed lines). It is evident that below 400 ◦ C the NO
100% conversion already at 225 ◦ C. The evolution of reaction prod-
conversion is kinetically limited, being far from the equilibrium
ucts started in the same T-window, showing a significant change
values. On the opposite, outlet NO and NO2 concentrations consis-
of products selectivity with temperature. N2 was the first species
tent with thermodynamic equilibrium constraints are approached
to be produced, reaching a maximum yield of about 60% at 225 ◦ C.
above 400 ◦ C, resulting in a decrease of NO conversion as the tem-
A further increase of the catalyst temperature resulted then in the
perature is increased.
progressive decrease of N2 production. N2 O also showed a maxi-
An interesting feature of NO oxidation over the investigated
mum behavior, centered around 250 ◦ C. Above 250 ◦ C the NOx yield
PGM catalytic system was highlighted during catalyst heat-up
started to monotonically increase, reaching a maximum of about
transients. Fig. 4 shows the temporal evolution of species outlet
80% at 550 ◦ C. Correspondingly a progressive reduction of both N2
concentrations and temperature for the T-steps run whose steady-
and N2 O yields was observed. The same test was also repeated with
state values were plotted in Fig. 3. Between 175 and 250 ◦ C, as soon
a lower oxygen feed content (2%, v/v, results not shown), showing
as the catalyst temperature was stepwise increased, the NO trace
negligible variations in terms of both NH3 conversion and N2 , N2 O
and NOx yields. Notably, in spite of the same amount of NOx pro-
duced, the relative proportions of NO and NO2 were significantly 60
different in the two tests, being controlled by the NO oxidation
reaction (R.5). 50
Species outlet concentrations in the studied temperature range
in
are consistent with the stoichiometry of the following global NO2 = 0 ppm
reactions, which proceed in parallel and prevail at different tem- 40
NO Conversion, %
0 in
3.1.3. NO O2 NO2 = 500 ppm
A set of experimental runs was dedicated to study the catalyst 100 150 200 250 300 350
behavior in the presence of NO and O2 : steady state activity tests
Temperature, °C
feeding to the reactor NO (500 ppm), O2 (8%, v/v), H2 O (8%, v/v)
and balance helium were performed in the 150–550 ◦ C temperature Fig. 5. NO oxidation on PGM catalyst, NO2 concentration effect: NO = 500 ppm;
range. Fig. 3 shows steady-state species outlet concentrations mea- NO2 = 0-250-500 ppm; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He,
sured during one of such runs: NO started to be converted at 150 ◦ C SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
866 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
A
100 100
B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
N2 yield, %
60 60
40 40
0 ppm NO
20 100 ppm NO 20
250 ppm NO
500 ppm NO
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
C
100 100
D
80 80
NOx yield, %
N2O yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 6. NH3 /NO reacting system on PGM catalyst, NO concentration effect: NH3 = 500 ppm; NO = 0-100-250-500 ppm, NO2 /NOx = 0; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier
gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
100 100
A B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
60 60
N2 yield, %
40 40
0 ppm NO2
100 ppm NO2
20 20
250 ppm NO2
500 ppm NO2
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
C D
80 80
NOx yield, %
60 60
N2O yield, %
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 7. NH3 /NO2 reacting system on PGM catalyst, NO2 concentration effect: NH3 = 500 ppm; NO2 = 0-100-250-500 ppm, NO2 /NOx = 1; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier
gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
attributed to the occurrence of the following unselective Standard- Fig. 7 shows the experimental results obtained feeding 500 ppm
SCR reaction: of NH3 and alternatively 100–250–500 ppm of NO2 to the reactor
while flowing oxygen (8%, v/v), water (8%, v/v) and balance helium.
2NH3 + 2NO + 3/2O2 → 2N2 O + 3H2 O (R.6) Temperature steps were performed while continuously feeding the
mentioned reactant mixture. Experimental results are also com-
A different behavior was observed at high temperatures, namely pared with those obtained in the absence of NO2 in the feed stream
above 400 ◦ C, with the N2 and N2 O yields not significantly affected (green square dots).
by NO addition. Finally, the trend of NOx yield as a function of The addition of NO2 to the feed resulted in a lower consumption
temperature (Fig. 6C) highlights that NO was consumed at low tem- of NH3 (Fig. 7A) in the 200–275 ◦ C temperature range. Complete
peratures (150–225 ◦ C T-range) and produced at higher ones, up to conversion of NH3 was indeed approached at 225 ◦ C in the absence
550 ◦ C, where the NOx yield exceeded 90% independently of the of NO2 , while total conversion was achieved only at 275 ◦ C when
NO feed content. Summarizing, the main finding associated with co-feeding also 500 ppm of NO2 . Above this temperature complete
the analysis of N2 and NOx yields as a function of temperature is ammonia conversion was approached for all reacting mixtures. The
that the N2 O production was highly enhanced below 275 ◦ C in the N2 yield was also influenced by the presence of NO2 (Fig. 7B):
presence of NO. the addition of 100 ppm of NO2 apparently suppressed N2 forma-
tion, with a decrease of the maximum yield from about 60% down
3.1.5. NH3 NO2 O2 to about 40%. However, nitrogen evolution resulted enhanced by
NO2 is commonly present in the feed stream to mobile SCR con- greater concentrations of NO2 , with a shift of the maximum yield
verters due to the inclusion of an upstream preoxidation catalyst to higher temperatures with growing NO2 feed contents. Above
in the configuration of aftertreatment systems. In addition, under 300 ◦ C almost the same yield was obtained both in the presence
unfavorable operative conditions NO2 might undergo an incom- and in the absence of NO2 . Fig. 7C shows how NOx , actually NO2 ,
plete selective reduction by NH3 : therefore, it could also represent was partially consumed at temperatures as high as 250 ◦ C; on
a possible side product at the outlet of the SCR converter. Hence, further increasing the catalyst temperature the NOx yield mono-
being NO2 a likely component of the ASC feed mixture, the inves- tonically increased independently of the feed mixture composition,
tigation of the NH3 /NO2 reacting system was also included in the approaching almost 100% at 550 ◦ C. The formation of N2 O (Fig. 7D)
present work. showed instead a progressive decrease with increasing NO2 feed
868 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
A
100 100
B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
N2 yield, %
60 60
40 40
0 ppm NOx
20 20
150 ppm NOx
250 ppm NOx
500 ppm NOx
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
C D
80 80
NOx yield, %
N2O yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 8. NH3 /NOx reacting system on PGM catalyst, NOx concentration effect: NH3 = 500 ppm; NOx = 0-150-250-500 ppm, NO2 /NOx = 0.5; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier
gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
content: a maximum yield of about 30% at 300 ◦ C was recorded in 3.1.6. NH3 NO NO2 O2
the presence of 500 ppm of NO2 , against a maximum of about 60% Finally, the complete NH3 /NO/NO2 O2 reacting system was also
in the absence of NO2 . At high temperatures (T > 400 ◦ C), in analogy investigated in steady state runs: 500 ppm of NH3 were fed to the
with what observed for the N2 yield, the amount of produced N2 O reactor together with 150–250-500 ppm of NOx (NO2 /NOx = 0.5),
seemed to be independent of NO2 . 8% (v/v) O2 , 8% (v/v) H2 O and balance helium. Temperature steps
From the analysis of NH3 conversion and products yields we can were performed while continuously feeding the mentioned reac-
speculate that the NH3 oxidation reactions were inhibited by NO2 , tants mixture.
specifically in the low-T region (T < 275 ◦ C), resulting in a decrease of Fig. 8 shows collected experimental results in terms of NH3
the NH3 conversion with increasing NO2 feed contents. The experi- conversion (Fig. 8A), N2 yield (Fig. 8B), NOx yield (Fig. 8C) and
mental evidence of such an inhibition effect was clear, but a detailed N2 O yield (Fig. 8D) in comparison with results collected in the
mechanistic study of this phenomenon was not in the scope of this absence of NOx in the feed stream (green square dots). Fig. 8A shows
study and will be performed in the next future. that the addition of increasing amounts of NOx had only a slight
In addition to the inhibited NH3 oxidation reactions, the NOx impact on the NH3 conversion, with a slight decrease of catalyst
consumption observed in the low-T range justified the introduction activity in the 200–250 ◦ C temperature region. NOx had negligi-
of two additional reactions describing the reactivity between NH3 ble effects on the N2 yield over the whole T-range (Fig. 8B). The
and NO2 : NOx yield (Fig. 8C) shows a trend similar to those observed for the
NH3 /NO and NH3 /NO2 reacting systems: NOx were partially con-
2NH3 + 2NO2 → N2 O + N2 + 3H2 O (R.7) sumed at temperatures below 250 ◦ C, then on further increasing
the catalyst temperature the NOx yield monotonically increased
4NH3 + 3NO2 → 7/2N2 + 6H2 O (R.8) independently of the feed mixture composition, approaching 100%
at 550 ◦ C. Regarding N2 O formation (Fig. 8D), the highest yields
The occurrence of these reactions was independent of the oxy- were recorded either in the absence of NOx or in the presence of
gen presence in the feed stream, as verified performing a diagnostic the highest NOx feed content (500 ppm), with a maximum centered
test in the absence of oxygen (results not shown). around 250 ◦ C.
M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876 869
In summary, it seems that in the low-T region (T < 275 ◦ C) Notably, a re-parameterized form of the desorption rate con-
NO2 inhibits both the NH3 oxidation reactions and the reactivity stant was used, with the purpose of reducing correlation of the
between NH3 and NO (reaction R.6). Indeed, the activity enhance- rate parameter estimates during parameter fitting. The same re-
ment provoked by NO in the feed mixture, as pointed out by Fig. 6, parameterized form of the rate constant was also implemented in
was not observed in the presence of NO2 . Furthermore, there was all the rate equations defined in the following paragraphs.
no direct evidence of additional reactions with respect to those
identified during the investigation of the NH3 O2 , NH3 /NO/O2 and 3.2.2. NH3 oxidation and non-selective standard SCR
NH3 /NO2 /O2 reacting systems. Three reactions, namely (R.2), (R.4) and (R.6), were included in
the kinetic model to describe the reactivity between NH3 and O2 ,
3.2. Kinetic model for the PGM catalyst both in the presence and in the absence of NO.
For the three reactions we assumed first order kinetics with
Based on the experimental data analyzed in Section 3.1, respect to the NH3 surface coverage, and a negative dependence
the following global reaction network was identified for the on the NO2 concentration. Experimental runs performed over the
NH3 /O2 /NO NO2 reactivity over the PGM component of the stud- PGM catalyst showed indeed that NH3 oxidation as well as the reac-
ied ASC system: tivity between NH3 and NO are both inhibited by NO2 , which could
be present either as the product of NO oxidation or as a component
NH3 adsorption/desorption : NH3 + ∗ ↔ NH3 ∗ (R.1)
of the feed mixture. Indeed, a detailed mechanistic investigation of
∗
NH3 oxidation to N2 : 2NH3 + 3/2O2 → N2 + 3H2 O (R.2) the NO2 inhibition phenomenon was beyond the scope of the PGM
∗ kinetic model development. In view of our current lack of under-
NH3 oxidation to NO : 2NH3 + 5/2O2 → 2NO + 3H2 O (R.4)
standing, we have therefore chosen a purely empirical approach
NO oxidation to NO2 : NO + 1/2O2 ↔ NO2 (R.5) in order to describe NO2 inhibition of the kinetics. Accordingly,
we introduced LHHW-type terms in the denominators of rate Eqs.
(16)–(18), thus accounting for their negative order dependence on
Non-Selective Standard SCR : 2NH3 ∗ + 2NO + 3/2O2 the NO2 concentration, without however necessarily invoking the
competitive adsorption of NH3 and NO2 on the same catalytic site.
→ 2N2 O + 3H2 O (R.6) Such inhibition terms thus are not associated with a single NO2
adsorption constant, but rather with multiple fitting parameters.
Additionally, the assumed kinetics were zero order with respect
NH3 /NO2 to N2 and N2 O : 2NH3 ∗ + 2NO2 to oxygen, based on the observed negligible variations of catalyst
→ N2 + N2 O + 3H2 O (R.7) activity and products selectivity over the 2%–8% (v/v) O2 concen-
tration range. Finally, for reaction R.6 first order kinetics were
considered with respect to the NO gas phase concentration,
0 −E PGM
exp kNN NN (1000/T − 1000/473) · NH
NH3 oxidation to N2 : rNN = 3
(16)
1 + KNN · CNO2
0 −E PGM
exp kNO NO (1000/T − 1000/473) · NH
NH3 oxidation to NO : rNO = 3
(17)
1 + KNO · CNO2
0 PGM C
exp kNHNOOX − ENHNOOX (1000/T − 1000/473) · NH NO
NH3 /NO/O2 to N2 O : rNHNOOX = 3
(18)
1 + KNHNOOX · CNO2
has been extensively reported [21,22]. In line both with literature 100
evidence and with the collected data, a consistent reaction rate was NH3
NO oxidation to NO2 :
1000 70
0 1000 N2 O
rNOox = exp kNOox−PGM − ENOox−PGM − 60
T 473
eq
(19)
50
CNO PO2 − CNO2 /KNO
× 2 40
1 + KNO2 −PGM · CNO2
30
20
3.2.4. Reactions involving NH3 and NO2 N2
Two reactions were included in the kinetic model to account for 10
the reactivity of NH3 with NO2 :
0
NH3 /NO2 to N2 and N2 O : 2NH∗3 + 2NO2 → N2 + N2 O + 3H2 O 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
(R.7) Temperature, °C
Fig. 9. NH3 oxidation on PGM catalyst, kinetic fit: NH3 = 500 ppm; H2 O = 8% (v/v);
NO2 − SCR to N2 : 4NH∗3 + 3NO2 → 7/2N2 + 6H2 O (R.8) O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). Symbols: experimen-
tal results; lines: model fit.
Second order overall kinetics in ammonia surface coverage and
NO2 gas phase concentration were adopted for both reactions (R.7)
100 100
A B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
N2 yield, %
60 60
40 40
NO2/NOx = 0
20 20
NO2/NOx = 0.5
NO2/NOx = 1
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100
100
C D
80
80
N2O yield, %
NOx yield, %
60 60
40 40
20
20
0
0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 10. NH3 /NO NO2 reacting system on PGM catalyst, effect of NO2 /NOx ratio and kinetic fit for alpha = 1: NH3 = 500 ppm; NOx = 500 ppm; NO2 /NOx = 0, 0.5, 1; H2 O = 8%
(v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He, SV = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). Symbols: experimental results; lines: model fit.
M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876 871
A
100 100
B
80 PGM 80
Mechmix
NH3 conversion, %
Double bed
SCR
N2 yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
C D
80 80
N2O yield, %
NOx yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 11. NH3 oxidation, comparison of different reactor configurations: NH3 = 500 ppm; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He. SVPGM = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP),
SVSCR = 690,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
and (R.8). This resulted in similar rate equations, namely (Eqs. (20) calculated (solid line) ammonia conversion and N2 , N2 O and NOx
and (21)). yields are plotted versus the catalyst temperature. The model
1000 1000
NH3 /NO2 to N2 and N2 O : 0
rNHNOO = exp kNHNOO − ENHNOO − PGM C
· NH (20)
NO2
T 473 3
1000 1000
NO2 − SCR to N2 : 0
rNOO = exp kNOO − ENOO − PGM C
· NH (21)
NO2
T 473 3
Reactions (R.1), (R.2) and (R.4)–(R.8), with the related rate equa-
tions (Eqs. (14)–(21)), thus provide a global kinetic scheme for the
PGM component of the investigated ASC system.
provides a fairly good description of the data over the whole
150–550 ◦ C T-range. The onset of NH3 conversion is indeed well
3.3. Kinetic fit captured as well as the evolution of products yields as a function of
catalyst temperature. Minor deviations can be observed between
Experimental data collected over the powdered PGM cat- 250 ◦ C and 300 ◦ C for the N2 yield and above 400 ◦ C for the NOx
alysts have been analyzed according to the heterogeneous yield.
one-dimensional plug-flow dynamic reactor model described in For the NO O2 reacting system (see Fig. B in Supplemen-
Section 2. Rate parameters of (Eq. (19)) were independently esti- tary material) the model was able to describe the experimentally
mated from NO oxidation tests while a global multiresponse observed trend of steady-state NO conversions over the whole
non-linear regression based on the least squares method applied investigated temperature range, both in the kinetically (T < 400 ◦ C)
to the whole set of runs involving NH3 provided estimates of the and in the thermodynamically (T > 400 ◦ C) controlled regimes.
remaining rate parameters in Eqs. (14)–(21). Fig. 10 illustrates the effects of the NO2 /NOx feed ratio on NH3
Kinetic fit results are presented in Figs. 9 and 10. Fig. 9 refers conversion and N2 , NOx and N2 O yields when feeding to the PGM
to the NH3 oxidation runs, where experimental (symbols) and catalysts equimolar amounts of NH3 and NOx (˛ = 1). Experimental
872 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
100 100
A B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
60 60
N2 yield, %
40 40
20 20
Mechmix
Double bed
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
C D
80 80
NOx yield, %
N2O yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 12. NH3 /NO reacting system on SCR + PGM catalysts, Double Bed versus Mechanical Mixture: NH3 = 750 ppm; NO = 250 ppm; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier
gas = He, SVPGM = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). SVSCR = 690,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
data (symbols) are plotted versus temperature together with fit catalytic chemistries in relation to limiting (segregated versus
results (solid lines). mixed) spatial arrangements of the two catalysts. Two catalytic
The effect of the NO2 /NOx ratio in terms of NH3 conversion is bed layouts have been in fact designed to achieve these goals: (i)
well captured by the model, with a decrease of catalyst activity a Double Bed configuration, with the first bed and the second bed
on increasing the NO2 content. The qualitative trends of N2 , NOx consisting of the SCR catalyst and of the PGM catalyst, respectively,
and N2 O yields are also well captured as a function of both tem- provides information on the sequential combination of the respec-
perature and NO2 /NOx ratio, though the quantitative agreement is tive catalytic activities; (ii) a single bed configuration, wherein the
not always perfect. Some deviations can indeed be observed below reactor is loaded with a mechanical mixture of the two catalyst
275 ◦ C for NO2 /NOx = 0.5 and above 300 ◦ C for NO2 /NOx = 1. powders, can suitably provide experimental evidence of local par-
The same qualitative results are observed also in case of excess allel interactions between the catalytic chemistries.
ammonia in the feed stream (see Fig. C in Supplementary material Like for the PGM catalyst, both the “Double Bed” and “Mechani-
for fit results with ˛ = 5). cal Mixture” configurations were studied by means of steady state
runs addressing the main SCR reacting systems, namely NH3 /O2 ,
3.4. Analysis of SCR/PGM interaction NH3 /NO/O2 , NH3 /NO2 /O2 and NH3 /NO NO2 /O2 .
100 100
A B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
60 60
N2 yield, %
40 40
20 20
Mechmix
Double bed
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
C D
80 80
N2O yield, %
NOx yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 13. NH3 /NO2 reacting system on SCR + PGM catalysts, Double Bed versus Mechanical Mixture: NH3 = 750 ppm; NO2 = 250 ppm; H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier
gas = He. SVPGM = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). SVSCR = 690,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP).
weakest oxidation performance, resulting in incomplete ammonia conversion was indeed obtained already at 275 ◦ C, with N2 yields
oxidation with almost total selectivity towards N2 at all tem- above 40% over the whole 150–550 ◦ C T-range. Correspondingly,
peratures, as well-established in the literature for Fe-zeolite SCR lower NOx and N2 O yields compared with PGM catalyst only and
catalysts [3,7,8,24]. Double Bed configuration were measured between 300 ◦ C and
On the opposite, the PGM catalyst exhibits the highest ammonia 500 ◦ C.
oxidation activity, with NH3 conversion above 90% already at 200 ◦ C The direct comparison between the two ASC combined sys-
(Fig. 11A). However the same catalyst is also the one associated with tems (Double Bed versus Mechanical Mixture) points out how the
the highest yield of NOx in the high T-range (see Fig. 11C). mechanical mixture of SCR and PGM powders entails the occur-
When the SCR catalyst is followed by the PGM one (“Double rence of interactions between the chemistries prevailing over the
Bed” configuration), the overall activity is strengthened due to the catalysts, which instead do not take place in the Double Bed con-
presence of the PGM catalyst: NH3 conversion and products yields figuration where the two catalysts are segregated. The different
are indeed almost overlapped with those of the PGM only cata- selectivity observed in the simultaneous presence of both cata-
lyst below 300 ◦ C, with some deviations only in terms of N2 yield. lysts are due in fact to the competition between the SCR and PGM
However, on moving to higher temperatures the contribution of reactivities, as the SCR reaction products can react over the PGM
the upstream SCR layer becomes significant, as pointed out by the catalyst and vice versa. A similar picture was observed by Long et al.
increased N2 yield above 500 ◦ C (Fig. 11B) and the corresponding [25] who studied a noble metal promoted Fe-ZSM-5 for Selective
decrease of the NOx yield (Fig. 11C). This trend is likely related to Catalytic Oxidation of NH3 . Long et al. [25] attributed the reduced
the partial selective conversion of NH3 to N2 in the SCR catalyst N2 O and NOx production to the SCR features of the combined cata-
bed. As a result a lower amount of unreacted ammonia is available lyst: N2 O and NO generated by NH3 oxidation over the noble metal
for the oxidation to NO occurring in the following PGM bed. can be indeed further reduced to N2 by unreacted ammonia, thus
The best compromise between activity and selectivity was improving simultaneously both ammonia conversion and N2 selec-
achieved with the PGM/SCR mechanical mixture: complete NH3 tivity.
874 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
100 100
90
A 90 B
80 80
70 70
NH3 conversion, %
N2 yield, %
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30 NO2/NOx = 0
NO2/NOx = 0 NO2/NOx = 0.5
20 20
NO2/NOx = 0.5 NO2/NOx = 1
10 10
NO2/NOx = 1
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100 100
90 C NO2/NOx = 0 90 D
80 NO2/NOx = 0.5 80 NO2/NOx = 0
NO2/NOx = 1 NO2/NOx = 0.5
NOx yield, %
70 70
N2O yield, %
NO2/NOx = 1
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 15. NH3 /NO NO2 reacting system on Double Bed (SCR + PGM) configuration, effect of NO2 /NOx ratio, model simulations: NH3 = 750 ppm; NOx = 250 ppm; H2 O = 8%
(v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He. SVPGM = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). SVSCR = 690,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). Symbols: experimental results; lines: model simulations.
M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876 875
NOx yields were always obtained in the case of the Double Bed 100
configuration.
NH3
In the high temperature region (T > 350 ◦ C), the general decrease 90
100 100
A B
80 80
NH3 conversion, %
N2 yield, %
60 60
40 40
20 NO2/NOx = 0 20
NO2/NOx = 0.5
NO2/NOx = 1
0 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
100
100
C D
80
80
NOx yield, %
60
N2O yield, %
60
40 40
20
20
0
0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Temperature, °C Temperature, °C
Fig. 17. NH3 /NO NO2 reacting system on Mechanical Mixture (SCR + PGM) configuration, effect of NO2 /NOx ratio, model simulations: NH3 = 750 ppm; NOx = 250 ppm;
H2 O = 8% (v/v); O2 = 8% (v/v); carrier gas = He. SVPGM = 1,093,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). SVSCR = 690,000 cm3 /h/ga.p. (STP). Symbols: experimental results; lines: model simulations.
876 M. Colombo et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143 (2013) 861–876
and PGM kinetics independently determined over the two pow- Such a positive interaction between the PGM and the SCR catalytic
dered catalyst components of the ASC system. chemistries was satisfactorily predicted by a model involving the
Fig. 14 shows simulation results for the Double Bed configu- simple superposition of the PGM and SCR kinetics.
ration in the case of the NH3 /O2 reacting system. A good match In summary, the present preliminary fundamental study has
between experimental data (symbols) and simulations (solid lines) confirmed a positive interaction between SCR and PGM catalytic
is evident for both ammonia conversion and NOx yield, while some chemistries, which beneficially affects the N2 selectivity. This
deviations are present between 275 ◦ C and 500 ◦ C for the N2 and promising synergy needs to be further verified in the real dual-
N2 O yields. layer monolith configuration of the ASC system. Accordingly, in
For the same configuration, the effect of NO2 /NOx is shown in the following part of the project the herein developed PGM kinet-
Fig. 15. Simulations (solid lines) resulted in good agreement with ics, together with consistent SCR kinetics, are incorporated in a
experiments (symbols) in the whole T-range for NO2 /NOx feed novel dual-layer monolith catalyst model, and validated against
ratios of either 0 or 1. In the case of NO2 /NOx = 0.5 a good match both lab-scale and engine test bench data collected over dual-layer
between experiments and simulations was found above 275 ◦ C, ASC catalysts. The related results will be reported in a forthcoming
while in the low-T range the overestimation of catalyst activity paper.
(Fig. 15A, pink line vs. diamonds) resulted in the somewhat incor-
rect prediction of N2 and NOx yields (Fig. 15B and C, pink line vs. Appendix A. Supplementary data
diamonds).
Predictive simulations of NH3 conversion and products yields Supplementary data associated with this article can be
in the case of the mechanical mixture configuration are shown in found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
Fig. 16 for the NH3 /O2 reacting system. In this case model predic- apcatb.2012.10.031.
tions resulted in very good agreement with experimental data over
the whole 150–550 ◦ C T-range, but for minor deviations of the NOx References
yield above 450 ◦ C.
A good simulation quality is also apparent above 350 ◦ C [1] T.V. Johnson, SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0304 (2011).
[2] A. Scheuer, W. Hauptmann, A. Drochner, J. Gieshoff, H. Vogel, M. Votsmeier,
in Fig. 17, showing the effect of the NO2 /NOx ratio on NH3 Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 111–112 (2012) 445–455.
conversion and products yields for the mechanical mixture. [3] M. Colombo, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, V. Schmeißer, B. Bandl-Konrad, L. Zimmer-
Significant deviations in terms of N2 and N2 O yields were mann, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 111–112 (2011) 106–118.
[4] M. Iwasaki, K. Yamazaki, H. Shinjoh, Applied Catalysis A: General 366 (2009)
instead observed comparing model predictions and experimen-
84–92.
tal data below 350 ◦ C, specifically in the case of NO2 /NOx = 0 and [5] P. Markatou, J. Dai, A. Johansson, W. Klink, M. Castagnola, T.C. Watling, M.
1. Tutuianu, SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1304 (2011).
On the whole, the results in Figs. 14–17 emphasize that the [6] L. Olsson, H. Sjövall, R.J. Blint, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 87 (2009)
200–210.
overall performance of combined SCR + PGM systems results from a [7] A. Schuler, M. Votsmeier, P. Kiwic, J. Gieshoff, W. Hautpmann, A. Drochner, H.
simple superposition of the respective catalytic chemistries, which Vogel, Chemical Engineering Journal 154 (2009) 333–340.
however provides different results depending on the relative spa- [8] H. Sjövall, R.J. Blint, A. Gopinath, L. Olsson, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
Research 49 (2010) 39–52.
tial distribution of the two catalyst components. [9] D. Chatterjee, T. Burkhardt, M. Weibel, I. Nova, A. Grossale, E. Tronconi, SAE
Technical Paper 2007-01-1136 (2007).
4. Conclusions [10] A. Scheuer, M. Votsmeier, A. Schuler, J. Gieshoff, A. Drochner, H. Vogel, Topics
in Catalysis 52 (2009) 1847–1851.
[11] A. Scheuer, O. Hirsch, R. Hayes, H. Vogel, M. Votsmeier, Catalysis Today 175
As a part in the development and validation of a chemically and (2011) 141–146.
physically consistent mathematical model of a commercial dual- [12] M. Colombo, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, Chemical Engineering Science 75 (2012)
75–83.
layer (SCR + PGM) monolithic NH3 slip converter (ASC), we have [13] C. Ciardelli, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, M. Ascherfeld, W. Fabinski, Topics in Catalysis
reported in this paper on NH3 /O2 /NO NO2 steady-state and tran- 42–43 (2007) 161–164.
sient kinetic runs performed over the PGM component of the NH3 [14] C. Ciardelli, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, B. Konrad, D. Chatterjee, K. Ecke, M. Weibel,
Chemical Engineering Science 59 (2004) 5301–5309.
slip catalyst, herein tested in the form of precursor washcoat pow- [15] P.L. Villa, P. Forzatti, G. Buzzi-Ferraris, G. Garone, I. Pasquon, Industrial & Engi-
ders. From these data an original global PGM kinetic model was neering Chemistry Process Design and Development 24 (1985) 12–19.
developed, which fully accounts for the effects of temperature and [16] G. Buzzi-Ferraris, G. Donati, Chemical Engineering Science 29 (1974)
1504–1509.
of NOx co-feed (with variable NO2 /NOx feed ratio in the 0–1 range)
[17] R. Kraehnert, M. Baerns, Chemical Engineering Journal 137 (2008)
on NH3 oxidation. The model considers both the well known NO2 361–375.
inhibition of NO oxidation, as well as a novel NO2 inhibition effect [18] E.V. Rebrov, M.H.J.M. de Croon, J.C. Schouten, Chemical Engineering Journal 90
on the NH3 oxidation reactions. The fit reveals that NH3 adsorption (2002) 61–76.
[19] Y. Li, J.N. Armor, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 13 (1997)
becomes the rate limiting step at intermediate-high temperatures. 131–139.
Comparative NH3 /O2 /NO NO2 steady-state runs were per- [20] D. Bhatia, R.W. McCabe, M.P. Harold, V. Balakotaiah, Journal of Catalysis 266
formed also over two different combinations of SCR + PGM (2009) 106–119.
[21] W. Hauptmann, M. Votsmeier, J. Gieshoff, A. Drochner, H. Vogel, Applied Catal-
powders, loaded in the test micro-reactor either as a sequential ysis B: Environmental 93 (2009) 22–29.
double-bed or as a mechanical mixture, respectively. While the NH3 [22] L. Olsson, E. Fridell, Journal of Catalysis 210 (2002) 340–353.
oxidation activity was similar, being controlled by the PGM compo- [23] L. Olsson, H. Persson, E. Fridell, M. Skoglundh, B. Andersson, The Journal of
Physical Chemistry B 105 (2001) 6895–6906.
nent, the N2 selectivity was greater over the mechanical mixture, [24] K. Kamasamudram, N.W. Currier, X. Chen, A. Yezerets, Catalysis Today 151
due to the fact that in this configuration the unselective NH3 oxi- (2010) 212–222.
dation products (NOx ) formed over the PGM catalyst had a chance [25] R.Q. Long, R.T. Yang, Catalysis Letters 78 (2002) 353–357.
to further react selectively with more NH3 over the SCR catalyst.