Manual Testing Questions and Answers
Manual Testing Questions and Answers
A. The finalized SRS will be placed in a project repository; we will access it from there
A. SRS stands for software requirement specification. SRS is used to understand the project
functionality from business and functional point of view.
A.srs describes what client is expecting from the system. For example in case of Gmail SRS
consists details like first page should be login, to access mail box user should be authenticated.
FRS describes how above requirements will be developed .in FRS, the functionality in SRS will
be written down in more technical terms. For example in case of Gmail FRS consists details like
for login what fields should be present and what are valid inputs. This means FRS will have
screen level details of the application.
Note: In many projects SRS itself will be designed at screen level details of the application.
A. Business analyst prepare the SRS document by interacting with the client. However a senior
testing team member can also be involved in requirements collections along with the
development team and the business analyst team.
A. It contains lots of use cases where each use case explains one or more functionalities
A. If it is known domain by going through use cases i can understand the requirements. if i have
some queries, i will discuss them with business analyst(BA) for clarifications. if it is new domain,
first i will get domain training them i go through the use cases. If the project requirements are
very confusing, then (BA) can also walk through each use case.
A. We get wireframes in the use cases which helps a lot to understand the functionality
8. What is wireframe?
9. What is usecase?
A. Usecase explains the step by step procedure of how a particular functionality of s/w is used
by the end user. Usecase contains sections such as
. usecase id
. usecase name
. description
. flow of events
. alternative flow of events
. pre,post conditions
A. I am aware of how usecases looks like and i can write if required. but i have never got an
opportunity to write the usecases because these are prepared by requirements gathering
team .Any how i have reviewed the usecases of certain functionalities and have given my inputs
for betterment of the same.
A. overview
Scope
Features
User characteristics
Software requirements
Hardware requirements
Performance requirements
Use cases
Security and reliability requirements
15. What are the different models generally followed in documenting requirements?
A. Two models are followed in documenting the requirements which are usecase model and
paragraph model. in paragraph model business requirements are written like a paragraph which
is old model. Now a days almost all companies follow the usecase model where the
requirements are written by stating their clear objectives and explained with the help of screen
shots.
26. I want you to choose one among static and dynamic testing for your project. Which one will
you choose and why?
A. static testing reduces the cost of fix and dynamic testing gives the complete confidence to
release the product. According to me both are equally important and both of them contribute
equally for the project success. so i prefer to have both. however if i have to choose one, i
choose dynamic testing since i cannot let the project to be released until i see with my eyes that
it is working.
27. out of formal and informal review, which one do you prefer?
A. In my view, both are important: informal review is fast and formal review is effective. we
have to use both depending on the data we are reviewing . I prefer formal and informal review
techniques as follows.
Formal Review:
> Reviewing test case document created
> Reviewing test plan document created
> reviewing test scripts developed
Informal Review:
> reviewing tests used for retesting
> Reviewing minor changes in test case, test plan or test scripts.
38. What are the entry and exit criteria for test execution?
Entry criteria:
--------------------------------
> coding should be completed
> test cases should be ready and base lined
> RTM should be updated
> test data should be read and base lined
> test environment/set up should be ready.
>s/w tools should be ready and approved.
Exit criteria:
-----------------------------
> All test cases must be executed and passed
> All defects identified must be fixed, retested and closed
> Test execution summary report must be prepared
40. How do you know you have a build ready for testing?
A. Frequency of build creation would vary from project to project .however below is the
guideline to answer this question. In our project automatic build creation deployment happens
on every x day. we receive a confirmation mail on every day morning about successful
deployment along with URL for testing .please refer our build process FAQ'S for exactly how
build deployment and release process.
41. How many test cases can you execute per day?
A. it depends on the size and complexity of the test cases. Approximately i execute around 50
test cases per day which comes to 40 pages approx.
45. Did you observe any application logs during the test execution?
A. yes. We do observe logs of the application server to check whether the server has thrown
any runtime errors.
46. Do you run all regression tests for every bug fixed?
A. No, I didn’t run regression test cases for every bug fixed. I run regression tests once for
every build.
48. In the modules you have worked on, are there any issues identified after release?
A. projects if i am supposed to write stubs or drivers in the current project i am confident that i
can handle it.
49. When you fill the data in the application form, how do you ensure that the data is stored in
the correct tables and columns?
A. we can write an SQL query to retrieve data from the data base and compare the query result
with the data we have filled in the application forms.
53. How do you know for which functionalities you should write test case?
A. My lead writes top level requirements in QC and assigns to each team member. we divide
test requirements further into sub requirements. Then we identify test conditions for each sub
requirement and create test cases. test cases are reviewed after that. Reviewed and approved
test cases will go to ready state.
55. What is the difference between test scenario and test case?
A. Test scenario is a high level description of business requirements, which is later decomposed
into a set of test cases. These test cases will be reviewed and approved by peers. we follow
formal review process for approving test cases written for each functionality.
57. How do you find whether a test case is a good test case or bad test case?
A. A good test case is one which finds the bug or one which has a high probability of finding the
bug. A good test case should be documented clearly, so that it can be executed by anyone
without any difficulties and confusion.
58. What is the percentage of positive and negative test cases that you write?
A. Approx 30% positive and 70% negative
59. Do you update the test cases after receiving build based on the application screen?
A. During execution, if we feel any test case requires an update, we will do it with the approval
of the team lead. but this work is very limited.
60. Explain one scenario where you were not able to write test cases for a given requirement?
A. Effort for a new domain by putting extra effort for through understanding of the domain.
61. What is the difference between a positive and negative test case?
A. A positive test cases checks whether the system does what it is suppose to do. I.e. to check
that we got the desired result with a valid set of inputs.
ex: the user should login in to the system with a valid user name and password.
Negative test case: A negative test case checks whether the system will do what it is not
supposed to do .i.e. to check the system generates the correct error or warning messages with
an invalid set of inputs.
ex: if the user entered the wrong user name or password, then the user should not login in to
the system and appropriate error message should be shown.
65. What parameters do the test manager considers to take the decision to stop testing ?
A. The important parameters a test manager looks into are
> Whether all requirements have been developed or not.
> Whether all requirements have been covered through testing.
> Whether all requirements have been handled through fixed or differed status.
Test-first design is one of the mandatory practices of Extreme Programming (XP). It requires
that programmers do not write any production code until they have first written a unit test.
120. how do the companies expect the defect reporting to be communicated by the tester to the
development team. Can the excel sheet template be used for defect reporting? If so what are
the common fields that are to be included? who assigns the priority and severity of the defect
To report bugs in excel:
Sno. Module Screen/ Section Issue detail Severity
Priority Issue status
this is how to report bugs in the excel sheet and also set filters on the Columns attributes.
But most of the companies use the share point process of reporting bugs In this when the
project came for testing a module wise detail of the project is inserted to the defect management
system they are using. It contains the following field
1. Date
2. Issue brief
3. Issue description(used for the developer to regenerate the issue)
4. Issue status( active, resolved, on-hold, suspend and not able to regenerate)
5. Assign to (Names of members allocated to project)
6. Priority(High, medium and low)
7. Severity (Major, medium and low)
124. How you will evaluate the tool for test automation?
We need to concentrate on the features of the tools and how this could be beneficial for our
project. The additional new features and the enhancements of the features will also help.
130. What are the major differences between stress testing, load testing, Volume testing?
Stress testing means increasing the load, and checking the performance at each level. Load
testing means at a time giving more load by the expectation and checking the performance at
that level. Volume testing means first we have to apply initially.
Descriptive Questions:
A: It depends on the size of the organization and the risks involved. For large organizations with
high-risk projects, a serious management buy-in is required and a formalized QA process is
necessary. For medium size organizations with lower risk projects, management and
organizational buy-in and a slower, step-by-step process is required. Generally speaking, QA
processes should be balanced with productivity, in order to keep any bureaucracy from getting
out of hand. For smaller groups or projects, an ad-hoc process is more appropriate. A lot
depends on team leads and managers, feedback to developers and good communication is
essential among customers, managers, developers, test engineers and testers. Regardless the
size of the company, the greatest value for effort is in managing requirement processes, where
the goal is requirements that are clear, complete and
testable.
A: Documentation plays a critical role in QA. QA practices should be documented, so that they
are repeatable. Specifications, designs, business rules, inspection reports, configurations, code
changes, test plans, test cases, bug reports, user manuals should all be documented. Ideally,
there should be a system for easily finding and obtaining of documents and determining what
document will have a particular piece of information. Use documentation change management,
if possible.
Q: What makes a good test engineer?
A: Good test engineers have a "test to break" attitude. We, good test engineers, take the point
of view of the customer; have a strong desire for quality and an attention to detail. Tact and
diplomacy are useful in maintaining a cooperative relationship with developers and an ability to
communicate with both technical and non-technical people. Previous software development
experience is also helpful as it provides a deeper understanding of the software development
process, gives the test engineer an appreciation for the developers' point of view and reduces
the learning curve in automated test tool programming.
Rob Davis is a good test engineer because he has a "test to break" attitude, takes the point of
view of the customer, has a strong desire for quality, has an attention to detail, He's also tactful
and diplomatic and has good a communication skill, both oral and written. And he has previous
software development experience, too.
Q: What is a test plan?
A: A software project test plan is a document that describes the objectives, scope, approach
and focus of a software testing effort. The process of preparing a test plan is a useful way to
think through the efforts needed to validate the acceptability of a software product. The
completed document will help people outside the test group understand the why and how of
product validation. It should be thorough enough to be useful, but not so thorough that none
outside the test group will be able to read it.
A: A test case is a document that describes an input, action, or event and its expected result, in
order to determine if a feature of an application is working correctly. A test case should contain
particulars such as a...
• Test case identifier;
• Test case name;
• Objective;
• Test conditions/setup;
• Input data requirements/steps, and
• Expected results.
Please note, the process of developing test cases can help find problems in the requirements or
design of an application, since it requires you to completely think through the operation of the
application. For this reason, it is useful to prepare test cases early in the development cycle, if
possible.
A: When a bug is found, it needs to be communicated and assigned to developers that can fix it.
After the problem is resolved, fixes should be re-tested. Additionally, determinations should be
made regarding requirements, software, hardware, safety impact, etc., for regression testing to
check the fixes didn't create other problems elsewhere. If a problem-tracking system is in place,
it should encapsulate these determinations. A variety of commercial,
problem-tracking/management software tools are available. These tools, with the detailed input
of software test engineers, will give the team complete information so developers can
understand the bug, get an idea of its severity, reproduce it and fix it.
A: Configuration management (CM) covers the tools and processes used to control, coordinate
and track code, requirements, documentation, problems, change requests, designs, tools,
compilers, libraries, patches, changes made to them and who makes the changes. Rob Davis
has had experience with a full range of CM tools and concepts, and can easily adapt to your
software tool and process needs.
Q: What if the software is so buggy it can't be tested at all?
A: In this situation the best bet is to have test engineers go through the process of reporting
whatever bugs or problems initially show up, with the focus being on critical bugs.
Since this type of problem can severely affect schedules and indicates deeper problems in the
software development process, such as insufficient unit testing, insufficient integration testing,
poor design, improper build or release procedures, managers should be notified and provided
with some documentation as evidence of the problem.
A: Since it's rarely possible to test every possible aspect of an application, every possible
combination of events, every dependency, or everything that could go wrong, risk analysis is
appropriate to most software development projects.
Use risk analysis to determine where testing should be focused. This requires judgment skills,
common sense and experience. The checklist should include answers to the following
questions:
• Which functionality is most important to the project's intended purpose?
• Which functionality is most visible to the user?
• Which functionality has the largest safety impact?
• Which functionality has the largest financial impact on users?
• Which aspects of the application are most important to the customer?
• Which aspects of the application can be tested early in the development cycle?
• Which parts of the code are most complex and thus most subject to errors?
• Which parts of the application were developed in rush or panic mode?
• Which aspects of similar/related previous projects caused problems?
• Which aspects of similar/related previous projects had large maintenance expenses?
• Which parts of the requirements and design are unclear or poorly thought out?
• What do the developers think are the highest-risk aspects of the application?
• What kinds of problems would cause the worst publicity?
• What kinds of problems would cause the most customer service complaints?
• What kinds of tests could easily cover multiple functionalities?
• Which tests will have the best high-risk-coverage to time-required ratio?
Q: What if the project isn't big enough to justify extensive testing?
A: Consider the impact of project errors, not the size of the project. However, if extensive testing
is still not justified, risk analysis is again needed and the considerations listed under "What if
there isn't enough time for thorough testing?" do apply. The test engineer then should do "ad
hoc" testing, or write up a limited test plan based on the risk analysis.
A: Work with management early on to understand how requirements might change, so that
alternate test plans and strategies can be worked out in advance. It is helpful if the application's
initial design allows for some adaptability, so that later changes do not require redoing the
application from scratch. Additionally, try to...
• Ensure the code is well commented and well documented; this makes changes easier
for the developers.
• Use rapid prototyping whenever possible; this will help customers feel sure of their
requirements and minimize changes.
• In the project's initial schedule, allow for some extra time to commensurate with probable
changes.
Move new requirements to a 'Phase 2' version of an application and use the original
requirements for the 'Phase 1' version.
Negotiate to allow only easily implemented new requirements into the project.
• Ensure customers and management understand scheduling impacts, inherent risks and
costs of significant requirements changes. Then let management or the customers decide if the
changes are warranted; after all, that's their job.
• Balance the effort put into setting up automated testing with the expected effort required
to redo them to deal with changes.
• Design some flexibility into automated test scripts;
• Focus initial automated testing on application aspects that are most likely to remain
unchanged;
• Devote appropriate effort to risk analysis of changes, in order to minimize regression-
testing needs;
• Design some flexibility into test cases; this is not easily done; the best bet is to minimize
the detail in the test cases, or set up only higher-level generic-type test plans;
Focus less on detailed test plans and test cases and more on ad-hoc testing with an
understanding of the added risk this entails.
Q: How do you know when to stop testing?
A: This can be difficult to determine. Many modern software applications are so complex and
run in such an interdependent environment, that complete testing can never be done. Common
factors in deciding when to stop are...
• Deadlines, e.g. release deadlines, testing deadlines;
• Test cases completed with certain percentage passed;
• Test budget has been depleted;
• Coverage of code, functionality, or requirements reaches a specified point;
• Bug rate falls below a certain level; or
• Beta or alpha testing period ends.
Q: What if the application has functionality that wasn't in the requirements?
A: It may take serious effort to determine if an application has significant unexpected or hidden
functionality, which it would indicate deeper problems in the software development process. If
the functionality isn't necessary to the purpose of the application, it should be removed, as it
may have unknown impacts or dependencies that were not taken into account by the designer
or the customer.
If not removed, design information will be needed to determine added testing needs or
regression testing needs. Management should be made aware of any significant added risks as
a result of the unexpected functionality. If the functionality only affects areas, such as minor
improvements in the user interface, it may not be a significant risk.
A: Implement QA processes slowly over time. Use consensus to reach agreement on processes
and adjust and experiment as an organization grows and matures. Productivity will be improved
instead of stifled. Problem prevention will lessen the need for problem detection. Panics and
burnout will decrease and there will be improved focus and less wasted effort.
At the same time, attempts should be made to keep processes simple and efficient, minimize
paperwork, promote computer-based processes and automated tracking and reporting,
minimize time required in meetings and promote training as part of the QA process.
However, no one, especially talented technical types, like bureaucracy and in the short run
things may slow down a bit. A typical scenario would be that more days of planning and
development will be needed, but less time will be required for late-night bug fixing and calming
of irate customers.
Q: What if the organization is growing so fast that fixed QA processes are impossible?
A: This is a common problem in the software industry, especially in new technology areas.
There is no easy solution in this situation, other than...
• Hire good people (i.e. hire Rob Davis)
• Ruthlessly prioritize quality issues and maintain focus on the customer;
• Everyone in the organization should be clear on what quality means to the customer.
Q: Why do you recommend that we test during the design phase?
A: Because testing during the design phase can prevent defects later on. We recommend
verifying three things...
1. Verify the design is good, efficient, compact, testable and maintainable.
2. Verify the design meets the requirements and is complete (specifies all relationships
between modules, how to pass data, what happens in exceptional circumstances, starting state
of each module and how to guarantee the state of each module).
3. Verify the design incorporates enough memory, I/O devices and quick enough runtime
for the final product.
Q: What is software quality assurance?
A: Software Quality Assurance, when Rob Davis does it, is oriented to prevention. It involves the
entire software development process. Prevention is monitoring and improving the process,
making sure any agreed-upon standards and procedures are followed and ensuring problems
are found and dealt with.
Software Testing, when performed by Rob Davis, is also oriented to detection. Testing involves
the operation of a system or application under controlled conditions and evaluating the results.
Rob Davis can provide QA/testing service. This document details some aspects of how he can
provide software testing/QA service. For more information, e-mail [email protected].
Organizations vary considerably in how they assign responsibility for QA and testing.
Sometimes they're the combined responsibility of one group or individual.
Also common are project teams, which include a mix of test engineers, testers and developers,
who work closely together, with overall QA processes monitored by project managers.
Software quality assurance depends on what best fits your organization's size and business
structure.
Q: How is testing affected by object-oriented designs?
A: A well-engineered object-oriented design can make it easier to trace from code to internal
design to functional design to requirements. While there will be little affect on black box testing
(where an understanding of the internal design of the application is unnecessary), white-box
testing can be oriented to the application's objects. If the application was well designed this can
simplify test design.
A: Quality Assurance ensures all parties concerned with the project adhere to the process and
procedures, standards and templates and test readiness reviews.
Rob Davis' QA service depends on the customers and projects. A lot will depend on team leads
or managers, feedback to developers and communications among customers, managers,
developers' test engineers and testers.
System testing simulates real life scenarios that occur in a "simulated real life" test environment
and test all functions of the system that are required in real life.
System testing is deemed complete when actual results and expected results are either in line
or differences are explainable or acceptable, based on client input.
Upon completion of integration testing, system testing is started. Before system testing, all unit
and integration test results are reviewed by Software QA to ensure all problems have been
resolved. For a higher level of testing it is important to understand unresolved problems that
originate at unit and integration test levels.
You CAN learn system testing, with little or no outside help. Get CAN get free information. Click
on a link!
A: Similar to system testing, the macro end of the test scale is testing a complete application in
a situation that mimics real world use, such as interacting with a database, using network
communication, or interacting with other hardware, application, or system.
A: Sanity testing is performed whenever cursory testing is sufficient to prove the application is
functioning according to specifications. This level of testing is a subset of regression testing.
It normally includes a set of core tests of basic GUI functionality to demonstrate connectivity to
the database, application servers, printers, etc.
A: Load testing is testing an application under heavy loads, such as the testing of a web site
under a range of loads to determine at what point the system response time will degrade or fail.
A: Security/penetration testing is testing how well the system is protected against unauthorized
internal or external access, or willful damage.
A: Compatibility testing is testing how well software performs in a particular hardware, software,
operating system, or network
This test includes the inventory of configuration items, performed by the application's System
Administration, the evaluation of data readiness, and dynamic tests focused on basic system
functionality. When necessary, a sanity test is performed, following installation testing.
A: Security/penetration testing is testing how well the system is protected against unauthorized
internal or external access, or willful damage.
A: Recovery/error testing is testing how well a system recovers from crashes, hardware failures,
or other catastrophic problems.
A: Compatibility testing is testing how well software performs in a particular hardware, software,
operating system, or network
Q: What is comparison testing?
A: Comparison testing is testing that compares software weaknesses and strengths to those of
competitors' products.
A: Acceptance testing is black box testing that gives the client/customer/project manager the
opportunity to verify the system functionality and usability prior to the system being released to
production.
The acceptance test is the responsibility of the client/customer or project manager, however, it
is conducted with the full support of the project team. The test team also works with the
client/customer/project manager to develop the acceptance criteria.
A: Beta testing is testing an application when development and testing are essentially
completed and final bugs and problems need to be found before the final release. Beta testing is
typically performed by end-users or others, not programmers, software engineers, or test
engineers.
A: The Test/QA Team Lead coordinates the testing activity, communicates testing status to
management and manages the test team.
A: Depending on the organization, the following roles are more or less standard on most testing
projects: Testers, Test Engineers, Test/QA Team Lead, Test/QA Manager, System
Administrator, Database Administrator, Technical Analyst, Test Build Manager and Test
Configuration Manager.
Depending on the project, one person may wear more than one hat. For instance, Test
Engineers may also wear the hat of Technical Analyst, Test Build Manager and Test
Configuration Manager.
A: We, test engineers, are engineers who specialize in testing. We, test engineers, create test
cases, procedures, scripts and generate data. We execute test procedures and scripts, analyze
standards of measurements, evaluate results of system/integration/regression testing. We
also...
• Speed up the work of the development staff;
• Reduce your organization's risk of legal liability;
• Give you the evidence that your software is correct and operates properly;
• Improve problem tracking and reporting;
• Maximize the value of your software;
• Maximize the value of the devices that use it;
• Assure the successful launch of your product by discovering bugs and design flaws,
before users get discouraged, before shareholders loose their cool and before employees get
bogged down;
• Help the work of your development staff, so the development team can devote its time to
build up your product;
• Promote continual improvement;
• Provide documentation required by FDA, FAA, other regulatory agencies and your
customers;
• Save money by discovering defects 'early' in the design process, before failures occur in
production, or in the field;
• Save the reputation of your company by discovering bugs and design flaws; before bugs
and design flaws damage the reputation of your company.
: What is a Test Build Manager?
A: Test Build Managers deliver current software versions to the test environment, install the
application's software and apply software patches, to both the application and the operating
system, set-up, maintain and back up test environment hardware.
Depending on the project, one person may wear more than one hat. For instance, a Test
Engineer may also wear the hat of a Test Build Manager.
Depending on the project, one person may wear more than one hat. For instance, a Test
Engineer may also wear the hat of a System Administrator.
A: Test Build Managers, System Administrators and Database Administrators deliver current
software versions to the test environment, install the application's software and apply software
patches, to both the application and the operating system, set-up, maintain and back up test
environment hardware. Depending on the project, one person may wear more than one hat. For
instance, a Test Engineer may also wear the hat of a Database Administrator.
A: Test Configuration Managers maintain test environments, scripts, software and test data.
Depending on the project, one person may wear more than one hat. For instance, Test
Engineers may also wear the hat of a Test Configuration Manager.
Q: What is a test schedule?
A: The test schedule is a schedule that identifies all tasks required for a successful testing effort,
a schedule of all test activities and resource requirements.
A: One software testing methodology is the use a three step process of...
1. Creating a test strategy;
2. Creating a test plan/design; and
3. Executing tests.
This methodology can be used and molded to your organization's needs. Rob Davis believes
that using this methodology is important in the development and ongoing maintenance of his
clients' applications.
A: The general testing process is the creation of a test strategy (which sometimes includes the
creation of test cases), creation of a test plan/design (which usually includes test cases and test
procedures) and the execution of tests.
Q: How do you create a test plan/design?
A: Test scenarios and/or cases are prepared by reviewing functional requirements of the
release and preparing logical groups of functions that can be further broken into test
procedures. Test procedures define test conditions, data to be used for testing and expected
results, including database updates, file outputs, report results. Generally speaking...
• Test cases and scenarios are designed to represent both typical and unusual situations
that may occur in the application.
• Test engineers define unit test requirements and unit test cases. Test engineers also
execute unit test cases.
• It is the test team that, with assistance of developers and clients, develops test cases
and scenarios for integration and system testing.
• Test scenarios are executed through the use of test procedures or scripts.
• Test procedures or scripts define a series of steps necessary to perform one or more
test scenarios.
• Test procedures or scripts include the specific data that will be used for testing the
process or transaction.
• Test procedures or scripts may cover multiple test scenarios.
• Test scripts are mapped back to the requirements and traceability matrices are used to
ensure each test is within scope.
• Test data is captured and base lined, prior to testing. This data serves as the foundation
for unit and system testing and used to exercise system functionality in a controlled
environment.
• Some output data is also base-lined for future comparison. Base-lined data is used to
support future application maintenance via regression testing.
• A pretest meeting is held to assess the readiness of the application and the environment
and data to be tested. A test readiness document is created to indicate the status of the
entrance criteria of the release.
Inputs for this process:
• Approved Test Strategy Document.
• Test tools, or automated test tools, if applicable.
• Previously developed scripts, if applicable.
• Test documentation problems uncovered as a result of testing.
• A good understanding of software complexity and module path coverage, derived from
general and detailed design documents, e.g. software design document, source code, and
software complexity data.
Outputs for this process:
• Approved documents of test scenarios, test cases, test conditions, and test data.
• Reports of software design issues, given to software developers for correction.
Q: How do you execute tests?
A: The test strategy is a formal description of how a software product will be tested. A test
strategy is developed for all levels of testing, as required. The test team analyzes the
requirements, writes the test strategy and reviews the plan with the project team. The test plan
may include test cases, conditions, the test environment, a list of related tasks, pass/fail criteria
and risk assessment.
Inputs for this process:
• A description of the required hardware and software components, including test tools.
This information comes from the test environment, including test tool data.
• A description of roles and responsibilities of the resources required for the test and
schedule constraints. This information comes from man-hours and schedules.
• Testing methodology. This is based on known standards.
• Functional and technical requirements of the application. This information comes from
requirements, change request, technical and functional design documents.
• Requirements that the system can not provide, e.g. system limitations.
Outputs for this process:
• An approved and signed off test strategy document, test plan, including test cases.
• Testing issues requiring resolution. Usually this requires additional negotiation at the
project management level.
Q: What is security clearance?
A: The levels of classified access are confidential, secret, top secret, and sensitive
compartmented information, of which top secret is the highest.
A software project test plan is a document that describes the objectives, scope, approach, and
focus of a software testing effort. The process of preparing a test plan is a useful way to think
through the efforts needed to validate the acceptability of a software product. The completed
document will help people outside the test group understand the 'why' and 'how' of product
validation. It should be thorough enough to be useful but not so thorough that no one outside
the test group will read it. The following are some of the items that might be included in a test
plan, depending on the particular project:
* Title
* Table of Contents.
* Purpose of document, intended audience
* Relevant related document list, such as requirements, design documents, other test plans, etc.
* Traceability requirements
* Test outline - a decomposition of the test approach by test type, feature, functionality, process,
system, module, etc. as applicable
* Outline of data input equivalence classes, boundary value analysis, error classes
* Test environment - hardware, operating systems, other required software, data configurations,
interfaces to other systems
* Test environment validity analysis - differences between the test and production systems and
their impact on test validity.
* Software CM processes
* Discussion of any specialized software or hardware tools that will be used by testers to help
track the cause or source of bugs
* Personnel allocation
* Test site/location
* Open issues
* Note that the process of developing test cases can help find problems in the requirements or
design of an application, since it requires completely thinking through the operation of the
application. For this reason, it's useful to prepare test cases early in the development cycle if
possible.
* The bug needs to be communicated and assigned to developers that can fix it. After the
problem is resolved, fixes should be re-tested, and determinations made regarding
requirements for regression testing to check that fixes didn't create problems elsewhere. If a
problem-tracking system is in place, it should encapsulate these processes. A variety of
commercial problem-tracking/management software tools are available (see the 'Tools' section
for web resources with listings of such tools). The following are items to consider in the tracking
process:
* Complete information such that developers can understand the bug, get an idea of it's
severity, and reproduce it if necessary.
* Bug identifier (number, ID, etc.)
* The function, module, feature, object, screen, etc. where the bug occurred
* Description of steps needed to reproduce the bug if not covered by a test case or if the
developer doesn't have easy access to the test case/test script/test tool
* Tester name
* Test date
* Description of fix
* Date of fix
* Retest date
* Retest results
This can be difficult to determine. Many modern software applications are so complex, and run
in such an interdependent environment, that complete testing can never be done. Common
factors in deciding when to stop are:
* Use risk analysis to determine where testing should be focused. Since it's rarely possible to
test every possible aspect of an application, every possible combination of events, every
dependency, or everything that could go wrong, risk analysis is appropriate to most software
development projects. This requires judgement skills, common sense, and experience. (If
warranted, formal methods are also available.) Considerations can include:
* Which aspects of the application can be tested early in the development cycle?
* Which parts of the code are most complex, and thus most subject to errors?
* Which parts of the requirements and design are unclear or poorly thought out?
* What do the developers think are the highest-risk aspects of the application?
* What kinds of problems would cause the most customer service complaints?
* Consider the impact of project errors, not the size of the project. However, if extensive testing
is still not justified, risk analysis is again needed and the same considerations as described
previously in 'What if there isn't enough time for thorough testing?' apply. The tester might then
do ad hoc testing, or write up a limited test plan based on the risk analysis.
* Work with the project's stakeholders early on to understand how requirements might change
so that alternate test plans and strategies can be worked out in advance, if possible.
* It's helpful if the application's initial design allows for some adaptability so that later changes
do not require redoing the application from scratch.
* If the code is well-commented and well-documented this makes changes easier for the
developers.
* Use rapid prototyping whenever possible to help customers feel sure of their requirements and
minimize changes.
* The project's initial schedule should allow for some extra time commensurate with the
possibility of changes.
* Try to move new requirements to a 'Phase 2' version of an application, while using the original
requirements for the 'Phase 1' version.
* Negotiate to allow only easily-implemented new requirements into the project, while moving
more difficult new requirements into future versions of the application.
* Be sure that customers and management understand the scheduling impacts, inherent risks,
and costs of significant requirements changes. Then let management or the customers (not the
developers or testers) decide if the changes are warranted - after all, that's their job.
* Balance the effort put into setting up automated testing with the expected effort required to re-
do them to deal with changes.
* Focus initial automated testing on application aspects that are most likely to remain
unchanged.
* Devote appropriate effort to risk analysis of changes to minimize regression testing needs.
* Design some flexibility into test cases (this is not easily done; the best bet might be to
minimize the detail in the test cases, or set up only higher-level generic-type test plans)
* Focus less on detailed test plans and test cases and more on ad hoc testing (with an
understanding of the added risk that this entails).
• What if the application has functionality that wasn't in the requirements?
* It may take serious effort to determine if an application has significant unexpected or hidden
functionality, and it would indicate deeper problems in the software development process. If the
functionality isn't necessary to the purpose of the application, it should be removed, as it may
have unknown impacts or dependencies that were not taken into account by the designer or the
customer. If not removed, design information will be needed to determine added testing needs
or regression testing needs. Management should be made aware of any significant added risks
as a result of the unexpected functionality. If the functionality only effects areas such as minor
improvements in the user interface, for example, it may not be a significant risk.
* This is a common problem in the software industry, especially in new technology areas. There
is no easy solution in this situation, other than:
* Management should 'ruthlessly prioritize' quality issues and maintain focus on the customer
* Everyone in the organization should be clear on what 'quality' means to the customer
* Client/server applications can be quite complex due to the multiple dependencies among
clients, data communications, hardware, and servers. Thus testing requirements can be
extensive. When time is limited (as it usually is) the focus should be on integration and system
testing. Additionally, load/stress/performance testing may be useful in determining client/server
application limitations and capabilities. There are commercial tools to assist with such testing.
(See the 'Tools' section for web resources with listings that include these kinds of test tools.)
* Web sites are essentially client/server applications - with web servers and 'browser' clients.
Consideration should be given to the interactions between html pages, TCP/IP communications,
Internet connections, firewalls, applications that run in web pages (such as applets, javascript,
plug-in applications), and applications that run on the server side (such as cgi scripts, database
interfaces, logging applications, dynamic page generators, asp, etc.). Additionally, there are a
wide variety of servers and browsers, various versions of each, small but sometimes significant
differences between them, variations in connection speeds, rapidly changing technologies, and
multiple standards and protocols. The end result is that
• testing for web sites can become a major ongoing effort. Other considerations might
include:
* What are the expected loads on the server (e.g., number of hits per unit time?), and what kind
of performance is required under such loads (such as web server response time, database
query response times). What kinds of tools will be needed for performance testing (such as web
load testing tools, other tools already in house that can be adapted, web robot downloading
tools, etc.)?
* Who is the target audience? What kind of browsers will they be using? What kind of
connection speeds will they by using? Are they intra- organization (thus with likely high
connection speeds and similar browsers) or Internet-wide (thus with a wide variety of connection
speeds and browser types)?
* What kind of performance is expected on the client side (e.g., how fast should pages appear,
how fast should animations, applets, etc. load and run)?
* Will down time for server and content maintenance/upgrades be allowed? how much?
* Will down time for server and content maintenance/upgrades be allowed? how much?
* How reliable are the site's Internet connections required to be? And how does that affect
backup system or redundant connection requirements and testing?
* What processes will be required to manage updates to the web site's content, and what are
the requirements for maintaining, tracking, and controlling page content, graphics, links, etc.?
* Which HTML specification will be adhered to? How strictly? What variations will be allowed for
targeted browsers?
* Will there be any standards or requirements for page appearance and/or graphics throughout
a site or parts of a site?
* How will internal and external links be validated and updated? how often?
* Can testing be done on the production system, or will a separate test system be required?
How are browser caching, variations in browser option settings, dial-up connection variabilities,
and real-world internet 'traffic congestion' problems to be accounted for in testing?
* How extensive or customized are the server logging and reporting requirements; are they
considered an integral part of the system and do they require testing?
* How are cgi programs, applets, javascripts, ActiveX components, etc. to be maintained,
tracked, controlled, and tested?
* Pages should be 3-5 screens max unless content is tightly focused on a single topic. If larger,
provide internal links within the page.
* The page layouts and design elements should be consistent throughout a site, so that it's clear
to the user that they're still within a site.
* Pages should be as browser-independent as possible, or pages should be provided or
generated based on the browser-type.
* All pages should have links external to the page; there should be no dead-end pages.
* The page owner, revision date, and a link to a contact person or organization should be
included on each page.
What is Extreme Programming and what's it got to do with testing?
* Extreme Programming (XP) is a software development approach for small teams on risk-prone
projects with unstable requirements. It was created by Kent Beck who described the approach
in his book 'Extreme Programming Explained' (See the Softwareqatest.com Books page.).
Testing ('extreme testing') is a core aspect of Extreme Programming. Programmers are
expected to write unit and functional test code first - before the application is developed. Test
code is under source control along with the rest of the code. Customers are expected to be an
integral part of the project team and to help develope scenarios for acceptance/black box
testing. Acceptance tests are preferably automated, and are modified and rerun for each of the
frequent development iterations. QA and test personnel are also required to be an integral part
of the project team. Detailed requirements documentation is not used, and frequent re-
scheduling, re-estimating, and re-prioritizing is expected.