Procurement-Contracts-Management-Pdf-notes-Level-6-lf7udv
Procurement-Contracts-Management-Pdf-notes-Level-6-lf7udv
Page 1 of 35
6.3.2 Learning Outcome No 1: Monitor progress of procurement contracts
6.3.2.1 Learning Activities
Learning Outcome No 1: Monitor progress of procurement contracts
Learning Activities Special Instructions
1.1 Develop tools for monitoring progress (data Groups of 5-10 to develop
collection tools) of contract based on tools to monitor business
parameters to be measured. progress
1.2 Monitor contract progress schedule developed
as per workplace policy.
4
Provide a sample contract
monitoring report
1.3 Conduct contract progress monitoring in 07273 4
Class tests
accordance with the monitoring schedule.
1.4 Prepare contract progress monitoring report as
6 3
Simulation
Page 2 of 35
Content/Procedures/Methods/Illustrations
6.1 Contract Monitoring
Contract monitoring is a process of making sure that vendors adequately or efficiently
perform a contracted service or work.
1.1 Tools for monitoring progress of contract are developed based on parameters to
be measured
Tools for monitoring progress
The most effective tools for monitoring contractor performance based on contract terms
and conditions are as stated below:
Contractor Progress Reports
Contractor Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Earned Value Management (EVM)
Performance Assessment
Product or Service Inspection and Acceptance
Contract Administration Plan (CAP)
Development of tools for monitoring procurement contract progress
A successful procurement contract progress is dependent on effective contract management
and contract administration processes and tools which result to lower operational costs,
increased user agency, efficiency in delivering services to taxpayers, and user
satisfaction. The following are essential elements for development of tools to monitor
contract progress;
Preparing a Contract Administration Plan (CAP).
Scheduling regular meetings or on-site visits to customer agencies to monitor and
discuss the progress of the contract and the performance of the contractor.
Convening kick-off meetings.
Training for best practices in contract administration.
Collecting meaningful data from user agencies.
Establishing good communication between the central procurement office and
customer agencies before, during and after the contract has been awarded and
signed.
Assessing contract risks and monitoring after the contract has been awarded.
Using tracking tools to monitor spending patterns and whether a contract is
working as intended.
Establishing performance metrics.
Page 3 of 35
contractor. The following is the information documented in the contract administration
plan (CAP):
Contract administration team members.
Justification of solicitation source section method.
Scope of work on specification that include deliverables.
Contract goals.
Pricing structure for contract.
Delivery terms and requirement.
Potential contractual risks and assignment risk levels.
Key contract terms and conditions to include risk mitigation and information
security.
Contract monitory methods.
How performance will be measured and accepted.
Milestones for measurement (linked to payment terms).
Payment terms.
Reporting methods and frequency.
Documentation required.
Names of contract administration team members responsible for measuring
performance, reporting, documenting files, payment, approval of change orders,
contract close out checklist, procedures and who is responsible for contract
closeout files.
Page 4 of 35
Documenting and maintaining of contract file to ensure the delivery is in line with
the contract requirements issues addressed timely.
All contract performance reports should be properly documented and included in
the official contract file.
The contract file should contain the essential record of contract award and
performance.
Documenting contract compliance and performance issues when the contractor
has underperformed as agreed upon and addressing them timely.
Regular communication with the contractor to identify problems in time.
Dispute resolution processes being in place to resolve problems and reach
agreement rather than seeking legal solution.
Anticipating amendments such as contract prices, time of performance, extension
and renewals since contract changes are inevitable.
Provision of written guidance by the procurement manager to agencies on contract
dispute and escalation procedures.
Poor or non-performance should never be accepted.
b) Item requirement
Item requirement include several levels of information about every item that needs to be
purchased. Gathering information about all materials required by the project depending on
229
Page 5 of 35
the type of project. This list might include tangible assets i.e. building materials or
equipment and intangible assets like software licenses. Include all pertinent information
about each item, size, quality, technical requirement and any information that ensures
purchase of the correct tool or material for the job.
Page 6 of 35
Date of submission
Project synopsis
Project progress in the reporting period
Work program for the following reporting period
Updated and revised activities schedule
Conclusion
This learning outcome unit covered contract monitoring schedule, report and their
preparation and implementation as per workplace policy. It also talked about the required
tools and techniques in procurement contract progress monitoring and contractor
performance measurement and management.
6.3.2.3 Self-Assessment
Written assessment
1. The procurement manager approves the purchases requested by the user department.
(yes or no).
2. The following are the contents of a progress report. Which one is not?
a) Reporting period
b) Project title
c) Date of submission
d) Lead time
3. Which one of the following is not a content of progress report?
a) Project title
b) Synopsis
c) Reporting period
d) Company name
4. Which one is not an aspect of contractor performance?
a) Delivery i.e. lead time
b) Service level
c) End user and stakeholder’s vendor performance rating
Page 7 of 35
d) None of the above
5. Highlight five functions of the procurement manager during contract management.
6. Define performance reporting.
7. Research on what the contract file should contain as far as the essential record of
contract award and performance is concerned
Practical Assessment
Visit a busy manufacturing firm and engage the procurement for you to analyze sample
monitoring reports and pick out the specific areas.
Project
Compare two manufacturing firms and evaluate the similarities and differences in their
monitoring of contract tools.
6.3.2.5 References
Department of Health (DH), (2013). Securing Best Value for NHS patients:
Requirements for Commissioner to Adhere to Good Procurement Practice and
Protect Patient Choice. London: DH.
Department of health DH, (2011). Equity and Excellence: Managing the Transition.
London: DH.
Kirkman, Marshall M., (1887). The Handling of Railway Supplies: Their Purchase and
Disposition. Chicago.
Lewis, M.A. and Roehria, J.K. (2009). Contracts, Relationship and Integration: Toward a
Model of the Procurement of Complex Performance. International Journal of
Procurement Management, 2(2):125-142.
National Audit Office, (2011). The Procurement of Consumable by NHS Acute and
Foundation Trusts. London: National Audit Office.
Page 8 of 35
6.3.3 Learning Outcome No 2: Manage Vendor Relationships
6.3.3.1 Learning Activities
Learning Outcome No 2: Manage vendor relationships
Learning Activities Special Instructions
Legal requirements: These are the stated rules and regulations required by law for
engaging in a certain activity (business) i.e. official approval, a license or a permit.
Page 9 of 35
Content/Procedures/Methods/Illustrations
2.1 Clear Specifications are Prepared
Preparation of specifications of needs/requirements in contracts
Specifications are statements of requirements from the supplier.
Page 10 of
35
d. Vetting specifications and obtaining approval
After writing the specification, ask a colleague who is unfamiliar with the requirement to
criticize it from a potential supplier’s view. Try to identify improvements by considering:
Reliability
Simplicity of meaning
Clarity
Logic
Seek approval from the appropriate financial purchasing delegates in the
Page 11 of
35
2.2 Vendors Evaluation is Done Fairly
Evaluation of vendors
Evaluation criteria
The basic evaluation criteria:
Cost
Quality
Delivery performance
WhatsApp 0726 733
a) 44
Supplies cost: An organization can measure cost in a number of ways. Most
common method is to track supplier’s real cost after adjustment for inflation.
Another method is to compare supplier’s cost against others within the industry or
business.
b) Quality: A buyer can compare quality against some previously specified
performance objectives. Track improvement rates and compare with similar
suppliers. It is important for a supplier to define clearly supplier’s quality
requirement.
c) Delivery performance: Orders or material releases sent to a supplier have a
quality and material due date. A buyer can track how well a supplier satisfies the
quantity and due date commitments. A buyer can also track the supplier’s material
lead time.
NOTE: Quality lead time performance and due date compliance helps define a supplier’s
delivery performance.
Page 12 of
35
Prevents performance slip page.
Provide suppliers with incentives for continuous improvement.
Helps decide how to distribute the expenses for an item.
Function of specification
Helps supplier to give the organization quality goods.
Helps in comparison between quotations from different suppliers.
Helps to solve disputes arising from what has been supplied.
Types of specification
a) Standard specification
This is used for recurrent needs.
Advantages of using standard specification
Facilitates communication.
Cost effective.
Results in wider competition and lower prices.
Can be used in an organization standardization programs resulting into purchasing
savings, price inspection, material handling.
Page 13 of
35
Standardized items are readily available.
Designs by professionals’ societies are often state of art and tested.
Cost of developing a design specification is avoided.
Disadvantages
Maybe dated. The buyer may take advantage of the latest technology.
Specifications may call for inputs or processes that are difficult or expensive to
achieve.
c) Performance specification
It generally describes a product by capacity, function or operation instead of its chemical,
physical or quality characteristic. Supplier need demonstrates acceptable performance to
achieve acceptance of product.
Advantages of performance specification
Easy to prepare.
Their use of performance specification tends to avail the purchaser to latest
technology.
Purchaser obtains specified level of quality.
several already designed items can meet performance specification depth of
competition is enhanced.
Page 14 of
35
Allow a greater degree of innovation by suppliers
Satisfaction profitably
Management and building of this relationship involve 3 phases i.e.
Page 15 of
35
A credible commitment to work together during difficult times.
Page 16 of
35
Diagnosing the cause-hidden actions, hidden information or badly designed
incentives.
Creating or redesigning incentives that will induce pertness to behave in ways that
maximize the supply chains profits.
Sharing information that was previously hidden among the parties.
Buyers using personal relationship or intermediaries to develop trust with suppliers.
Buyers conducting incentives audits when they adopt new technologies, enter new
markets, or launch supply chain improvement programs.
WhatsApp 0726 733
Training managers about processes and incentives at the organization.
Page 17 of
35
Suppliers confidence is increased in the buyer as a business partner.
The buyer is able to negotiate better deals.
The buyer avoids late payment interest charges.
Page 18 of
35
Quality Assurance systems.
Performance.
Environmental and ethical factors.
Information Technology.
Vendor/supplier rating
Used to assess the performance of already existing suppliers so as to improve their
performance or replace them.
Subjective supplier
WhatsApp 0726 733
A purchasing officer is appointed to observe on how well the suppliers are performing
44
and then judge each supplier. It’s subjective because different individual have different
value of judgment.
Advantages
Fast to carry out.
Cheap to carry out.
Disadvantages
May not be factual because of personal likes and dislikes.
May not be accurate.
May be prone a subject to bribery.
No records kept for future reference.
Page 19 of
35
Conclusion
This learning outcome covered the interaction between two or more parties either by
buying or supplying goods and services. It is important for the learner to be able to
prepare clear specifications, evaluate vendors fairly and objectively, award contracts, give
incentives, exercise flexibility based on the case at hand, pay vendors, and appraise
vendors as per SOPs.
Further Reading
WhatsApp 0726 733
44
National Audit Office. (2011). The Procurement of Consumables by NHS Acute and
Foundation Trust. London: National Audit Offices.
6.3.3.3 Self-Assessment
Written Assessment
1. The following of paying supplier of time include the following except one. Name it?
a) Negotiate better deals.
b) Avoid late payment.
c) Positive relationship between the parties involved.
d) None of the above.
2. Supplier’s incentives are well described when an organization (buyer) aligns its
incentives.
a) True
b) False
3. Delay in delivery can cause conflict in supply.
a) True.
b) False.
4. The following are reasons for evaluating supplier except
a) It signifies supplier performance.
b) To know their worth.
c) Assists in decision making regarding whether a supplier is to be retained or
removed.
d) Assists in deciding to which supplier a specific order should be placed.
5. Define supplier appraisal.
6. Explain how vendor should be appraised.
7. Discuss obstacle to buyer supplier relationships.
Page 20 of
35
8. Discuss role of customer relationship management in supplier relationships.
9. Select an organization of your choice and carryout supplier quality management and
submit a report
6.3.3.5 References
Department of health (DH) Equity and Excellence: Managing the Transition. London:
DH: 3022.
Department of Health (DH). (2013). Securing Best Value for NHS Patients; Requirement
for Commissioners to Adhere to Good Procurement Practice and Protect Patient
Choice. London: DH.
National Audit Office. (2011). The Procurement of Consumaldes by NHS Acute and
Foundation Trust. London: National Audit Offices.
Page 21 of
35
6.3.4 Learning Outcome No 3: Evaluate vendor contract performance
6.3.4.1 Learning Activities
Introduction
This learning outcome will train on how to evaluate vendor contract performance.
Evaluation of vendor performance is important in ensuring that an organization/ company
is able to purchase quality products or receive value for their money. In this learning
outcome trainees will get skills and knowledge of how to develop vendor progress
evaluation tools, appoint a vendor evaluation committee, preparing and circulating vendor
committee meeting. The trainee will also acquire knowledge and skills in preparing
vendor report and procedures to follow to terminate non performing contracts.
Page 22 of
35
Performance: This is the execution of tasks as per the guidelines or set organizational
indicators.
Content/Procedures/Methods/Illustrations
3.1 Vendor Contract Progress Evaluation Tools are Developed Based on Parameters to
Be Measured
Vendor evaluation is a process that company use to make decision on which vendor
should be allowed to provide services of products in case where there are many vendors.
This process can also be used when the progress of a contract is being required. This can
WhatsApp 0726 733
happen when items are being purchased for the first time, the item is sourced differently.
44
Evaluation of vendor performance is very important in organizations. This is because:
It assists organizations to reduce procurement costs
It assists organizations to manage risks effectively
Helps organizations to be strategic in their relationship with vendors
It develops supply chain management strategies
It helps vendors to improve their performance
A vendor’s performance should be evaluated based on context of their contractual
obligations. The following is a list of categories which organizations may consider using
as performance evaluation criteria. Recommended criteria for vendor performance
evaluation are:
Accountability
Hazard and Risk Assessment
Accuracy
Human Resources
Administration
Innovation
Collaboration
Invoicing
Communication
Quality
Compliance
Safety
Cost
Schedule
Delivery
Scope
Emergency Response
Supervision
Page 23 of
35
Vendor Evaluation Tools
To be able to evaluate vendor performance it is critical that the various evaluation tools
be developed. The following tools are used in evaluating vendor contract progress:
a) Key performance Indicators (KPIs): This is the obligations that if a vendor meets,
an organization considers as important to the overall success of the organization.
Before initiating procurement processes, an organization needs to identify what
activities they consider most crucial to the success of the organization.
b) Procurement-Supplier Meetings: Scheduled meetings between procuring
organizations and vendors are an effective way of monitoring performance. Meetings
WhatsApp 0726 733
between suppliers and procurers also help the two parties build relationships while
performance is being monitored.
44
c) Technical review meetings: These are meetings between procurers’ technical team
and the supplier’s technical experts to review reports, performance results and come
up with ways to improve processes.
d) Audits and long-term reviews: Audits are very effective in determining the extent to
which contracts are being adhered to as well as determining how to adhere to
emerging change. This could also help to do an effective cost benefit analysis.
e) Spot checks: These are important as they ensure that vendors adhere to the contract
standards. Spot checks on vendors can either be announced or spontaneous,
unannounced spot checks should however be included in the contract and not be
frequent to maintain trust.
f) Contract reports: When signing contracts with vendors, it is important to include
performance as one of the deliverables. This acts as a monitoring tool.
Administration: Exceptional
• Invoice accuracy
Good
• Customer Service
Satisfactory
• Communication (public &Cautionary
staff) Not satisfactory
Page 24 of
35
Unacceptable
Quality of Product Exceptional
• Product Delivery
Good
• Quality of product
• Communication
Satisfactory
Cautionary
Not satisfactory
Timelines
Unacceptable
Exceptional
WhatsApp 0726 733
Adherence to product delivery 44
schedule
Good
Satisfactory
Cautionary
Not satisfactory
Unacceptable
Cost Control: Exceptional
Number of Change Orders
Cost of Additional Service
and/or Work Good
Compliance with Original
Contract Price Satisfactory
Cautionary
Not satisfactory
Unacceptable
Total Score /70 = %
Overall comments
Page 25 of
35
Supervisor Name
Signature:
Purchasing Rep: Signature
I declare that I have completed this evaluation in a fair and honest manner. I further
confirm that my judgment in completing this evaluation has not been influenced by
any actual or potential “Conflict of Interest”, as outlined in the laws and rules
regulating Public procurement act.
Rating Description of Rating
10 Exceptional Performance 4
significantly exceeds Contract
73 4
requirements to the County’s benefit, for example, the
Contractor implemented innovative or business process
0723
reengineering techniques, which resulted in added
value to the County. The contractual performance of
6
the element or sub-element being assessed was
WhatsAp
accomplished with few minor problems for which
corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly
effective. p
8-9 Good Performance meets contractual requirements and
exceeds in some area(s) to the County’s benefit. The
contractual performance of the element or sub element
being assessed was accomplished with some minor
problems for which corrective actions taken by the
Contractor were effective.
6-7 Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The
contractual performance of the element or sub-element
contains some minor problems for which proposed
corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear
satisfactory, or completed corrective actions were
satisfactory.
5 Cautionary Performance did not quite meet contractual
requirements. The contractual performance of the
element or sub-element contains some minor problems
for which proposed corrective actions taken by the
Contractor appear to be a continued minor concern, or
completed corrective actions were slightly below
satisfactory
3-4 Not Performance does not meet some contractual
Satisfactory requirements. The contractual performance of the
element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious
Page 26 of
35
problem for which the Contractor has submitted
minimal corrective actions, if any. The Contractor’s
proposed actions appear only marginally effective or
were not fully implemented.
0-2 Unacceptable Performance does not meet contractual requirements
and/or recovery is not likely in a timely or cost-
effective manner. The contractual performance of the
element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for
which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear to
be or were 0726 733
Figure 38: vendor performance ineffective.
evaluation form 44
Techniques for measuring Vendor contract
performance
There are various techniques used in evaluating vendor performance such as
Price-based metrics
Quality-based metrics
Cost based metrics
WhatsAp
p
Many companies use a vendor evaluation tool that allows transaction data to be analyzed
to give a comparison between vendors. The vendor evaluation uses criteria that have been
determined by the purchasing or department to compare vendors such as:
Price
Delivery reliability
Delivery date adherence
Quality of the item
There are any numbers of criteria that can be used in a comparison and these are usually
weighted so that important criteria are given more credence. For example, a company
may decide that the quality of the items it receives from vendors is more important than
price, which in turn is more important than delivery reliability. The company would then
weight these criteria so that the overall score reflects that requirement.
Page 27 of
35
appropriate an Interim Performance Evaluation should be performed by the Project
Evaluator(s) and provided to the Vendor by the Purchasing department. The Vendor will
be held responsible for the performance of its sub-contractors. If the Vendor’s response
or corrective action continues to be a concern, the terms and conditions of the contract
regarding non-performance may be enforced by the Purchasing & Risk Manager.
3.3 Prepare and Circulate Notice for Vendor Contract Progress Evaluation Committee
Meeting as Per Workplace Policy
To effectively manage vendor performance, it is important have an open communication
with the vendors throughout the project. The vendors should be informed in writing when
their performance is being evaluated and if there are any concerns. A request for
appropriate measures to be undertaken should be communicated in writing within an
acceptable timeframe. This is done with reports generated from vendor contract progress
evaluation process. The people involved in the evaluation of the vendors should be
informed in time about the exercise.
Page 28 of
35
1.3 Conduct Vendor Contract Progress Report as Per Workplace Policy
Conducting a vendor performance report is a key process and important in supporting an
effective purchasing and contracting function of an organization. Vendors need to be
monitored and evaluated to ensure that timely receipt of supplies from vendors,
completion of assignment by consultants and complete execution of order by a vendor
within scheduled completion period.
44
sheet with the measurement parameters are prepared.
Step 2: Compute and grade vendor performance data as received.
Step 3: Initiation measures. Depending on results from the computing and grading
corrective measures would be initiated by taking up the matter with the concerned
vendor. The vendor is supposed to respond to the concerns based on the response the
vendoring committee and decide the next course of action.
Step 4: Implementation of Corrective Measures
Develop an outline with the vendor of how the corrective measures will be implemented.
Page 29 of
35
It is important to have open communication with the vendor throughout the project and to
inform the vendor in writing when their performance is a concern and to request
appropriate corrective actions within an acceptable timeframe, in accordance with the
Solicitation’s terms and conditions. It is equally important to keep a written record of all
correspondence with the vendor. If the vendor’s response or corrective action is still a
concern, departmental staff should involve the Purchasing Department. Where it is
deemed appropriate an Interim Performance Evaluation should be performed by the
Project Evaluator(s) and provided to the Vendor by the Purchasing department. The
Vendor will be held responsible for the performance of its sub-contractors. If the
WhatsApp 0726 733
Vendor’s response or corrective action continues to be a concern, the terms and
44
conditions of the contract regarding non-performance may be enforced by the Purchasing
& Risk Manager. Results obtained from vendor performance evaluation can become less
useful with time. It is therefore suggested that individuals should share the information
immediately or with a timeframe of not less than 7 years. Dissemination of vendor
performance is significant in making decisions in an RFP process as well as identifying
reliable vendors for the company.
Page 30 of
35
transitioning to another vendor. In either case, you need to begin preparation and have
completed your due diligence before you terminate, to smooth the handover process and
minimize the risk.
d) Plan your exit
Getting out of a relationship is as much of a project as is getting in, but with potentially
more operational and financial risks. A well-considered exit plan allows you to identify
what you will need to make a successful transition. There are many issues that often get
missed during the exit process, so a proper plan will ensure you cover these off too,
minimizing the potential for disruption. You can use the business plan created in step 3 to
4
measure the progress of your exit and ensure everything is proceeding as intended.
e) Prepare your evidence
73 4
Most vendors will not like their contracts terminated. Termination can get messy and case
0723
a lot of time wastage or even court cases. To avoid messy termination and court cases one
is required to prepare their evidence on non-performance of the vendor. Focusing on the
6
right element is important. One would use the contract issued while awarding the tender
WhatsAp
and evaluation report from an independent party. A report advising vendors on how to
improve the service is also a good evidence if the vendors did not implement it.
f) Sanity check your evidence p
Once you’ve gathered your evidence, the next step is to evaluate whether it shows what
you thought it would and that it’s strong enough to proceed. Evidence is often imperfect.
At the end of this stage you should know whether or not it shows, on balance, that the
vendor delivered to your expected business outcomes (not necessarily just to their
contractual KPIs, which may not align with your business outcomes). You will also be
clear whether you have interpreted vital elements of your evidence correctly, such as
your vendor’s expert responsibilities and how they should be benchmarked against what
is reasonable. The safest and most cost-effective way to check your evidence is to have
someone independent undertake a ‘critical friend’ challenge, so they can advise you of
what works, what doesn’t and where your focus of evidence should be, according to the
business outcomes you are trying to achieve.
g) Choosing the right forum for your termination
Different forums are used in contract termination
Negotiations & mediation
expert determination
Arbitration or litigation.
Each has advantages and disadvantages, depending on what you are trying to achieve.
Selecting the right forum can significantly reduce your costs and speed up the process.
There is little point proceeding directly to litigation if a less formal and lower cost
process can achieve your goals.
Page 31 of
35
h) Negotiating the termination and exit with your vendor
Negotiating a termination and exit of a strategic relationship is challenging and emotions
often run high on both sides. However, there are steps you can follow which will smooth
the process and increase your chances of a successful outcome. In particular, if your
vendor has breached both its express contractual KPIs and its expert responsibilities, and
you have had the evidence independently validated, then the negotiation process will be
much swifter.
Setting out your arguments clearly, with solid and independently validated evidence, will
4
help your vendor to understand that it will cost them more to resist the termination and
73 4
exit than it will to comply, agree and support the process. Always be sure to align your
termination and exit negotiation strategy with the written contract terms, and always seek
0723
independent and qualified advice in respect of formal termination. Damages for adopting
the wrong termination and exit procedure can be penal.
i) Managing the exit process 6
WhatsAp
Once you have formally terminated the relationship, you need to treat the exit process as
a key project in its own right. As with any project, it must have resources allocated to it,
p
external and internal support, key milestones, objectives, payment profiles and
performance targets to be met. Governance and performance management are critical to a
successful termination and exit process. Make sure you give it the time and attention it
needs.
j) Seek legal and technical support
Many organizations need independent support when terminating a contract, to avoid the
potential financial damages that a vendor can claim if the contract is terminated
incorrectly. It is therefore vital to choose the right lawyer and technical expert, instruct
them properly and to manage their output, so you get the outcomes you want and achieve
value for money. The right lawyer or technical expert can add considerable value by
keeping the focus of your evidence right, speeding up the process and minimizing all
costs (including their own). They will help you to avoid mistakes that will undermine
your position and give you the support and independent perspective you need to
successfully pursue your case.
Conclusion
The learning outcome covered vendor contract performance with the aim of imparting
knowledge to the learner on ways of identifying early signs when the vendor is not
adhering to the set terms and conditions. The unit also covers interventions one should
seek before termination of the contract such as increased monitoring.
Page 32 of
35
Further Reading
6.3.4.3 Self-Assessment
WhatsApp 0726 733
Written assessment
44
Seven multiple choice questions
1. Which of the following is a KPI in Vendor performance evaluation?
a) Price.
b) Time of delivery.
c) Number of free deliveries.
d) Vendors region.
2. Three of the tools listed below are not used in Vendor performance. Which one is?
a) Gantt chart.
b) Benefits management platform.
c) Payroll service.
d) KPI.
3. Which of the following is not a strategy to managing poor performance?
a) Hold progress meetings.
b) Ignoring small mistakes.
c) Come up with problem solving techniques.
d) Terminate contract.
4. Which of the following is not considered in the vendor performance checklist?
a) Product
b) Rapport
c) Delivery
d) Customer service
5. Which of the following is not an importance of vendor contract performance
evaluation?
a) Helps organizations to be strategic in their relationship with vendors.
b) It develops supply chain management strategies.
c) It helps vendors to improve their performance.
d) It allows organizations to receive discounts.
Page 33 of
35
6. Explain two importance of vendor contract performance evaluation.
7. Discuss the various considerations one should make before terminating a contract.
8. Describe three main tools used in vendor performance evaluation.
9. Explain some of the criteria used by vendor evaluation committee during vendor
performance evaluation.
Oral Assessment
1. What are the main procedures for terminating a non performing contract
performance?
2. Explain the main components of a vendor progress report.
WhatsApp 0726 733
3. Why is it important to evaluate vendor contract performance?
Practical Assessment
44
Company XYZ issued Kilu general supplies a tender to supply books in public secondary
schools in Eastern region. You have been contracted to evaluate Kilu contract performance.
a) Prepare a document showing the procedures you will apply to evaluate Kilu
contract performance.
b) Outline the key parameters that you will use in measuring vendor contract
performance of Kilu generals.
c) Develop the tool you will use in this vendor contract performance evaluation.
d) Prepare an outline of a evaluation progress report.
6.3.4.5 References
Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., & Nair, A. (2006). Vendor Performance with Supply Risk: A
chance-constrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production
Economics, 100(2), 212-222.
Weber, C. A. (1996). A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Measuring Vendor
Performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1(1), 28-39.
Page 34 of
35
Xu, J., Li, B., & Wu, D. (2009). Rough Data Envelopment Analysis and its Application
to Supply Chain Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Production
Economics, 122(2), 628-638.
Page 35 of
35