compression paperrev
compression paperrev
Review
A Paper Review
Presented to Engr. Loreimay B. Andaya
of the College of Engineering
Camarines Norte State College
Daet, Camarines Norte
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the
Material Science and Engineering
December 2024
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
F. PIMENTEL AVENUE, BRGY. 2, DAET, CAMARINES NORTE – 4600, PHILIPPINES
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
correlation (DIC), further extends the method’s capabilities, allowing for comprehensive
analysis of material behavior under compressive loads. This research focuses on glass-
fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRPs), comparing results from the modified ASTM D695
standard with those obtained using the proposed method. The goal is to provide a more
reliable and scalable solution for compression testing of reinforced polymers, paving the
way for broader industrial and research applications.
METHODOLOGY
The study employed two primary methods for compression testing. The first
adhered to a modified ASTM D695 standard, where specimens were guided along their
length to prevent buckling. Specimens were prepared from GFRP composite boards with
a [0°/90°] fiber orientation. The Boeing method involved smaller specimens, typically
100 × 16 mm, which limited space for strain gauges. In response to these limitations, a
novel tower-type specimen design was introduced. This design allows for the attachment
of T-type strain gauges and the application of optical methods, such as DIC, enabling
more comprehensive data collection.
The testing process was conducted using a universal testing machine with a
controlled strain rate of 0.5 mm/min. For comparative analysis, finite element analysis
(FEA) was employed to simulate loading conditions. The FEA simulations considered
two scenarios: a uniformly distributed force and a quasi-concentrated force, both applied
to validate experimental observations. The specimens were analyzed for mechanical
properties such as Young’s modulus, compressive strength, and Poisson’s ratio.
RESULTS
However, stress concentrations at the tabs were a notable limitation. The tower-type
specimens demonstrated improved performance, providing accurate measurements of
Poisson’s ratio, calculated as 0.14. This method also facilitated the use of advanced
monitoring techniques, such as digital image correlation (DIC).
Finite element analysis (FEA) results closely aligned with experimental data, validating
the method’s accuracy. The observed error margins were 6.52% for normal stress and
4.76% for strain in the center of the specimens. Furthermore, FEA simulations
highlighted the impact of force eccentricity and resin layer variations on stress
distribution. Minor deviations in force application or resin layer thickness significantly
influenced the material’s compressive behavior, emphasizing the importance of precise
specimen preparation.
DISCUSSION
The study underscores the importance of innovative specimen design and testing
methodologies in characterizing the compressive behavior of FRPs. The tower-type
specimen design addresses traditional limitations, such as buckling and inadequate space
for strain gauge installation. This novel approach enables larger testing volumes, reduces
buckling risks, and provides more reliable data through advanced techniques like DIC.
4
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
F. PIMENTEL AVENUE, BRGY. 2, DAET, CAMARINES NORTE – 4600, PHILIPPINES
CONCLUSION
END NOTE
5
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
F. PIMENTEL AVENUE, BRGY. 2, DAET, CAMARINES NORTE – 4600, PHILIPPINES
REFERENCES
Morăraș, C.I., Husaru, D., Goantă, V., Bârsănescu, P.D., et al. (2024). A New Method for
Compression Testing of Reinforced Polymers. Polymers, 16(3071), 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16213071.