0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views3 pages

Geol709 N04

The document discusses methods for measuring stream flow, including discharge, wetted perimeter, hydraulic radius, and the Manning equation. It also covers various gauging techniques, the use of weirs and flumes, and methods for estimating stream loss or gain. Key challenges in measuring stream flow are highlighted, such as variable channel geometry and the influence of sediment dynamics.

Uploaded by

fatmabry03
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views3 pages

Geol709 N04

The document discusses methods for measuring stream flow, including discharge, wetted perimeter, hydraulic radius, and the Manning equation. It also covers various gauging techniques, the use of weirs and flumes, and methods for estimating stream loss or gain. Key challenges in measuring stream flow are highlighted, such as variable channel geometry and the influence of sediment dynamics.

Uploaded by

fatmabry03
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

GEOL 709 Lecture Notes Fall 2009

Measuring stream flow

Discharge - flow through a stream has units of volume (L3) per unit time typically in cfs,
mgd, acre-feet/day and is considerably more difficult to measure than flow through a pipe
or open channel. In both of those cases the constant geometry of the system allows
assumptions regarding average velocity as a function of distance form the wetted
perimeter. In a stream channel geometry is highly variable, precluding such assumptions.
Looking at a cross-section perpendicular to flow, we expect velocity at any given time to
vary with both vertical (depth) and horizontal location, thus making it difficult to asses an
average value. We can also expect the distribution of velocities to change with depth
(stage) as the stream will change in width and some obstructions will be
covered/uncovered. As a final problem, the stream channel is not fixed in time, even at
constant stage due to scour and deposition.

wetted perimeter - Assuming a cross-section perpendicular to the flow, the wetted


perimeter is the length along that cross-section that represents contact between the stream
channel and water. For a rectangular cross-section, wetted perimeter is equal to width
plus 2 times the depth.

hydraulic radius – Derived quantity equal to cross-sectional area divided by wetted


perimeter; has units of L. For a given cross-sectional area, hydraulic radius will be at a
minimum for a circular pipe, which is the most efficient method of conveying fluid.
Effectively, the wetted perimeter describes the area which resists flow through friction.

Manning equation - this gets used when other methods are impossible, such as during
transients, flow above the rating curve, no gauging station, etc., relates average velocity
to hydraulic radius, slope of the water table and an empirical measure the 'Manning
Coefficient' which is supposed to represent frictional losses, an estimate of the cross-
section can then be used to estimate flow, the USGS publishes photographs to estimate
the Manning coefficient. This is an empirical relationship and hence can not be used in
the derivation of other parameters
2 1
1.49R 3 S 2
V=
n
V = average velocity (ft/s)
R = hydraulic radius (ft)
S = slope of stream surface (ft/ft)
n = Manning coefficient

mountain streams (high resistance to flow) n ~0.05, real empirical


concrete ditches (low resistance to flow n = 0.12, much less empirical

floats – For a really rough estimate of discharge, one can estimate cross-sectional area
and average velocity. Pick two cross-sections on the calmest stretch possible, estimate the
area of each and average. toss something that floats in and time how long it takes to go
GEOL 709 Lecture Notes Fall 2009

from one cross-section to the other. Do this several times and take an average. This is not
very accurate, but may be the best that you can do in some situations, or at least a start
before choosing another method. Even if you know the cross-sectional areas precisely,
the float method is biased. Water along the top surface of the stream is moving faster than
average, plus it is difficult to get the float into all possible stream lines, and ones that
involve eddies may not be representative. May want to break the stream up into several
flow channels, get an average velocity for each. Water at the top of the stream is faster
than the average. The surface velocity multiplied by 0.85 is a reasonable estimate of
average velocity. Lightweight items that float high in the water are affected by wind.
Something that floats a little bit deeper like an orange is more representative.

gauging - the measurement device has a bullet shaped housing with a what looks like a
wind speed indicator attached, the housing is placed at 0.6 times stream depth and the
velocity measured, this is done across the stream at regular intervals and all the data
summed to find cross-sectional area and flow rate, describe winch mounted and pygmy
meters

stage heights - if the river has a stable cross section, meaning it isn't changing it's
channel, flow rate will be directly correlated to river stage, the USGS measures the stage
at numerous locations, quite often at highway bridges (stable x-section, easy access),
describe a gauging station (stilling well), the stage height is converted to flow using a
calibration curve based on gauged data, this has to be checked frequently and doesn't
work for floods above the calibration curve. Note that once the river exceeds its banks,
small increases in stage will result in large increases in flow.

weirs - basically these means placing a dam across the river and forcing it to flow across
a notch such that the water falls freely after passing the notch which in theory should
have a knife edge. Empirical equations have been developed that relate weir dimensions,
including depth of water to the flow rate. This technique is also used to measure flow
during pump tests.

V-notch weir (90˚ notch)


5
Q = 2.5H 2

Q − discharge ( ft 3 /s)
H − backwater depth ( ft)

rectangular weir with edge contractions


€ 3
Q = 10 3 (L − 0.2H ) H 2

Q − discharge ( ft 3 /s)
H − backwater depth ( ft)
L − length of weir crest ( ft)


GEOL 709 Lecture Notes Fall 2009

Portable weirs may be used for small streams, ditches and outflow from aquifer tests.
permanent weirs are essentially a dam in the stream and may be subject to regulations.
These are very commonly used in irrigation canals. Note that the notch must be sufficient
to measure flows. It does you no good to have water flowing over the top of the weir. The
weir equations are sensitive to H, so small errors in H can lead to big errors in Q. Thus
using too big of a weir will lead to substantial error, because H is a pain to measure
accurately. For low flows, a v-notch weir is most accurate. You need to consider the
range of flows to be measured. Do you care about maximum/minimum flows, or normal
flow? You can put a v-notch in the base of a rectangular weir to cover a large range of
flows.

Installing a weir, fixing it in place, minimizing leakage.

Flume – Essentially this means forcing flow through a rectangular open channel that has
a constant cross-sectional area and slope. flow is then estimated though use of the
Manning equation, which is well understood for flumes. In order for this to work the
flume has to be long enough so that end effects dissipate before the measurement section.

Estimating stream loss/gain

seepage meter

in-stream piezometers

sequential gauging stations

wells perpendicular to the stream

hydrograph separation

tracer applications

geochemistry

You might also like