GECC-105.-Lesson5Module (1)
GECC-105.-Lesson5Module (1)
Biodiversity
The term biodiversity was first coined by Walter G. Rosen in 1986. It comes from the
Greek word, bios, meaning "life" and the Latin term diversitas, meaning “variety.”
Biological diversity, abbreviated as biodiversity, represents the sum total of various
life forms such as unicellular fungi, protozoa, bacteria, and multi-cellular organisms
such as plants, fishes. and mammals at various biological levels including gens,
habitats, and ecosystem.
Types of Biodiversity
Biodiversity has three types, namely: species diversity, ecosystem diversity,
and genetic diversity.
Genetic diversity. The more likely it is to develop specific characteristics that permit
it to adjust to new environmental pressures, such as climate change or disease. In
contrast, for those with a low degree, such pressures might drive a population to
extinction.
The following concepts are believed to affect, and are also affected, by biodiversity.
Trophic level. The removal of species from one trophic level can cause the
devastation of ecosystem as well as biodiversity.
Complex ecosystem. In a complex ecosystem having numerous trophic levels, loss of
one or more species does not affect any serious problem since an alternative is
available.
Keystone species. Loss or addition of species causes noticeable modifications in
ecosystem states, that is, the species make a unique contribution to the functioning
of the ecosystem itself. The sea star as
shown in the illustration, serves as the keystone species of the bay.
Niche complementarity. Variation among species in their requirements for diverse
resources will be a source of complementary interaction; hence, a species would
acquire more resources. When two species thrive on the same island (called
sympatric populations), they have a tendency to display larger differences in
morphology (in this case of the Galapagos Finches, the shape of beak) and resource
consumption than when found on different islands (allopatric populations). This
therefore lets the species to evade competition.
Ecological facilitation. Species interactions such as commensalism or mutualism:
Plants may also benefit from their neighbors through improvement of the physical
and biotic environment.
Portfolio effect. Species richness increases the linear stability of the entire
community while the biomass is also stabilized. Species-rich communities are
thought to create more stable ecosystem services because of the complementary or
independent dynamics among species that perform similar ecosystem functions.
Insurance hypothesis. Biodiversity buffers ecosystem against environmental changes
such as climate change. Green species increase in number in warm years, while blue
species proliferate in cold years, thus, a community comprising only blue or green
species will vary in biomass when there is inter-annual climate differences.
Conversely, in the community having both green and blue individuals, the
reduction in one species is recompensed for by a rise in the other species, hence
generating a stable ecosystem productivity between years. Moreover, typically, the
varied community displays higher productivity than any of the single-species
community. This configuration can happen if blue or green species are active at
slightly dissimilar times, so that competition between the two species is diminished.
This difference in species activity leads to complimentary resource utilization and
can increase total productivity of the ecosystem.
Experts claim that about 1.4 and 1.8 million species have already been
scientifically acknowledged. The earth is a huge, complex world and authorities
discover new species through science almost all the time. This is proven by the World
Resources Institute (WRI), an international research organization that includes over
50 countries. Its goal is to implement its big ideas to sustain the world’s natural
resources—the foundation of economic opportunity and human well-being, by
moving its more than 450 experts and other staff by working with leaders worldwide.
They claim that:
Scientists were startled in 1980 by the discovery of a tremendous diversity of
insects in tropical forests. In one study of just 19 trees in Panama, 80% of the 1,200
beetle species discovered were previously unknown to science... Surprisingly,
scientists have a better understanding of how many stars there are in the galaxy
than how many species there are on Earth (World Resources Institute).
Thus, if these experts don’t know how much species there is to begin with,
then they don’t know accurately how much the earth is losing. But the numbers
presented above are substantiated by researches and it cannot be argued that at
present, there is, in reality, a very serious biodiversity crisis.
The experts claim that based on their studies, unlike the mass extinction events of
the earth’s geological history, the present extinction problem is one for which a
single species appears to be almost entirely responsible—the Homo sapiens. So, if
humans have been causing the rapid loss in biodiversity, what can be done to retard
this irreversible damage?
The next decade sees a historic moment when world leaders will make key
decisions as regards the environment, climate and sustainable development. These
decisions will set the agenda for the world’s future. Collectively, people can help
shape these global decisions and deliver a message that it's no longer acceptable to
continuously ruin nature to its dark end—and that humans can take a different,
brighter path.