0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Validation-Sheet-1

The document is a questionnaire assessing students' levels of intimidation in chemistry, covering areas such as insecurity, perceived threats, and physical harm. It also evaluates students' academic outcomes, including their ability, motivation, and developmental level. Additionally, a validation sheet is included, rating the clarity, organization, and suitability of the questionnaire items.

Uploaded by

yeung palang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Validation-Sheet-1

The document is a questionnaire assessing students' levels of intimidation in chemistry, covering areas such as insecurity, perceived threats, and physical harm. It also evaluates students' academic outcomes, including their ability, motivation, and developmental level. Additionally, a validation sheet is included, rating the clarity, organization, and suitability of the questionnaire items.

Uploaded by

yeung palang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

LEVELS OF INTIMIDATION IN CHEMISTRY SUBJECT QUESTIONNAIRE

Name: (optional) __________________________________________________


Section: _________________________________

Direction: Below are levels of intimidation in chemistry subjects of students. Tick the column
with a check (/) that corresponds to your answer per item.

Legend: 5-Strongly Agree 4-Agree 3- Neutral 2-Disagree 1-Strongly


Disagree

STUDENTS LEVEL OF INTEMIDATION

INSECURITY 5 4 3 2 1
The student perceives that he/she is not knowledgeable enough about this
subject.
The student concludes that he/she is the only one that does not understand
Chemistry.
The student feels insecure because he/she always got low scores in every
assessment.
The student tends to compare his/her understanding of the previous lessons
of the said subject/topic.
The student tends to conclude/give up that he/she will not be able to
understand Chemistry.
THREATS 5 4 3 2 1
The students see problem solving, equations and formula as a threat.
The student perceives the topics under Chemistry as a threat and will not be
able to understand it.
The student concludes that the teacher is a threat in understanding the
subject itself, he/she is intimidated to the teacher.
The student sees his/her classmate as a threat in learning Chemistry.
The student sees the experiments, chemicals and the activities to be done in
the laboratory as a threat.
PHYSICAL HARM 5 4 3 2 1
The student is less interested of the subject because of the dangers of the
chemicals they may encounter in laboratories.
The student is confident to participate Chemistry related activities because
there are guidelines to follow in order to avoid hazards during
experiments/demonstrations.
The student is less likely to participate in Chemistry activities due to certain
circumstances that happened from his/her previous Chemistry activities.
The student is very cautious to the dangers of the chemicals that they may
encounter during Chemistry laboratory activities.
The student knows beforehand how to utilize or demonstrate a said activity
or experiment, and is being facilitated by the teacher.
LEVELS OF INTIMIDATION IN CHEMISTRY SUBJECT QUESTIONNAIRE

Name: (optional) __________________________________________________


Section: _________________________________

Direction: Below are the Student's Academic Outcome. Tick the column with a check (/) that
corresponds to your answer per item.

Legend: 5-Strongly Agree 4-Agree 3- Neutral 2-Disagree 1-Strongly


Disagree

STUDENT’S ACADEMIC OUTCOME


STUDENT’S ABILITY 5 4 3 2 1
The student perceives that he/she will be able to understand the topic due to
understanding of previous Chemistry subjects.
The student understands simple equations.
The student is good at understanding concepts e.g. Physics, Projectile
motion.
The student masters only certain points/areas only in Chemistry.
The student knows nothing about Chemistry at all.
MOTIVATION 5 4 3 2 1
The student is expecting that the activities prior to the subject/topic are
interesting and fun.
The student is actively participating because the teacher gives them time to
process and understand e.g. Solving
The student is participating due to teacher’s recognition.
The student is listening and at the same time participating because the
teacher let them share their thoughts, comments and suggestions after every
discussion.
The student is intrinsically motivated to learn because he/she loves the
subject/topic.
DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL 5 4 3 2 1
The student is motivated to learn, for he/she knows the basic concepts in
Chemistry.
The student knows how to solve simple equations in Chemistry; therefore,
the student can understand or relate the topics to today’s lesson.
The student is able to comprehend the Chemistry subjects as some of the
topic are related to real-life contexts.
The student is able to understand the subject/topic, because of his/her
previous knowledge about Chemistry.
The student is not able to comprehend the subject due to poor
understanding of the topic from his/her previous Chemistry lessons.
VALIDATION SHEET
(P.M. Veroy RN, MAN)

Name of validator: Palang, Leomark L.


Degree:
Position:
No. of years in teaching: 2 1/2 years

To the evaluator: Please check the appropriate box of your ratings.

Scale: 5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 – Good 2- Fair 1 – Poor


5 4 3 2 1
1. Clarity and Directions of Items ✔
The vocabulary level, language, structure and
conceptual level of participants. The test
directions and the items are written in a clear
and understandable manner.
2. Presentation and Organization of Items ✔
The items are presented and organized in
logical manner.
3. Suitability of Items ✔
The item appropriately presented the substance
of the research. The questions are designed to
determine the skills that are supposed to be
measured.
4. Adequateness of the Content ✔
The number of the questions per area is a
representative enough of all the questions
needed for the research.
5. Attainment of Purpose ✔
The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives
needed for the research.
6. Objective ✔
Each item questions requires only one specific
answer or measures only one behavior and no
aspect of the questionnaires suggests in the
past of the researcher.
7. Scale and Evaluation Rating ✔
The scale adapted is appropriate for the item.

REMARKS:

LEOMARK L. PALANG
Signature Over Printed Name

You might also like