Draft - MQA Programme Standards General V1
Draft - MQA Programme Standards General V1
STANDARDS
GENERAL
Programme Standards General
First Edition: 2025
Page
FOREWORD i
ABBREVIATIONS iii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
4. STUDENT SELECTION 27
5. ACADEMIC STAFF 35
6. EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES 43
7. PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT 45
REFERENCES 50
APPENDICES
GLOSSARY 53
FOREWORD
This PS outlines sets of characteristics that describe the minimum levels of acceptable
practices in general programmes based on the seven quality assurance areas:
programme development and delivery, assessment of student learning, student
selection and support services, academic staff, educational resources, programme
management, and programme monitoring, review and continual quality improvement.
Accordingly, the PS covers different levels of standards leading to the award of
individual qualifications prescribed in the MQF 2nd Edition, ranging from the level of
certificate (Level 3, MQF) to the level of Doctoral degree (Level 8, MQF).
This PS was developed by the MQA in collaboration with the Ministry of Higher
Education. It represents the significant contribution from the panel members (as listed
in Appendix 1) from both public and private HEPs and the industry, and in consultation
with various HEPs, relevant government and statutory agencies, industries, alumni
and students (see Appendix 2) through stakeholder workshops and online feedback.
The PS developed reflects national and international best practices to ensure general
programmes graduates from the HEPs in Malaysia are on par with those in other
countries.
That being said, this PS does not attempt to provide specific characteristics for general
programmes, particularly those related to the framing of curricula and provision of
educational resources. This PS encourages diversity and allows programme providers
i
to be innovative in creating their niches. HEPs should ensure that they produce
graduates that meet the current and future needs of the industry and at the same time,
fulfil their obligations to society. Among others, this document includes statements of
programme educational objectives and learning outcomes, which are intended to give
clarity and are not intended to be adopted in a verbatim manner.
The MQA would like to express appreciation to all the panel members and various
stakeholders for their valuable input, as well as all MQA officers who contributed to the
development of this PS for General Programmes. It is hoped that this PS is beneficial
to different stakeholders for the development of the competencies required of our
students, for both job and higher education prospects.
ii
ABBREVIATIONS
PS Programme Standards
The Programme Standards (PS) General serves as a reference and guidance for
Higher Education Providers (HEPs) regarding the minimum acceptable practices in
designing and offering programmes in Malaysia at the tertiary levels. Given that
numerous programmes do not fit within any specific PS, this universal standard
becomes invaluable. Unlike discipline-specific PS, this standard provides a baseline,
allowing flexibility for contextualization while upholding minimum requirements.
On 7 July 2021, the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) was entrusted with a
significant responsibility through Memorandum Jemaah Menteri No. M331/ 2021. This
mandate directed MoHE to release the National Education Code entitled National
Education Code-2020 (NEC-2020), establishing it as the singular reference point for
the field of study in training and education across Malaysia. This meticulous
classification system serves as a comprehensive framework, facilitating the
understanding and organization of educational programmes. It is pivotal in aiding
Higher Education Providers (HEPs) to align their offerings with the appropriate
standards and guidelines.
A comprehensive review and application of key frameworks and best practices guides
the development of the PS General. The approach involved a detailed examination of
the National Education Code 2020 (NEC-2020) to identify and address areas lacking
defined standards. This thorough review identified 71 specific fields without
established PS, encompassing 36 fields in science and 35 in non-science disciplines.
Adhering to the Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF), the standards align with
various qualification levels: Certificate (Level 3, MQF), Diploma (Level 4, MQF),
Advanced Diploma (Level 5, MQF), Bachelor’s Degree/Graduate Certificate/Graduate
Diploma (Level 6, MQF), Master’s Degree by Coursework/Postgraduate
Certificate/Postgraduate Diploma (Level 7, MQF), Master’s Degree by Mixed Mode
(Level 7, MQF), Master’s Degree by Research (Level 7, MQF), Doctoral Degree by
Coursework (Level 8, MQF), Doctoral Degree by Mixed-Mode (Level 8, MQF), and
Doctoral Degree by Research (Level 8, MQF).
1
Unlike discipline-specific standards, the PS General establishes a foundational
baseline, allowing for contextual flexibility while ensuring compliance with essential
criteria. The standard was cross-referenced with the latest benchmarks in various
disciplines, including Accounting (2024), Business Studies (2021), Computing (2023),
Creative Multimedia Technology (2021), Halal Studies (2020), Occupational Safety
and Health (2023), Psychology (2023), Traditional and Complementary Medicine
(2021), Final Draft of Media and Communication Studies (2024), and Final Draft of
Education (2024).
The PS covers all the seven quality assurance areas: (i) programme development and
delivery, (ii) assessment of student learning, (iii) student selection and support
services, (iv) academic staff, (v) educational resources, (vi) programme management,
and (vii) programme monitoring, review and continual quality improvement. This
document describes the different levels of standards leading to the award of individual
qualifications prescribed in the MQF based on different modes of study, which are:
2
As the purpose of this PS is to provide minimum requirements on the development
and conduct of different levels of general programmes within the core areas described,
it is paramount that this document is read together with other quality assurance
documents and policies issued by MQA, Professional Bodies and other related
agencies, which include but are not limited to the following:
3
2. PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY
Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) are broad statements that describe the
career and professional accomplishments that the programme is preparing students
to achieve after they graduate.
4
The PEOs of each level of qualification are outlined in Table 2.1 below:
Bachelor/ Masters/
Advanced Graduate Postgraduate
Certificate Diploma Doctoral
Diploma Certificate/ Certificate/
(Level 3, (Level 4, (Level 8,
(Level 5, Graduate Postgraduate
MQF) MQF) MQF)
MQF) Diploma Diploma
(Level 6, MQF) (Level 7, MQF)
PEO1 The The The The practitioner The practitioner The
practitioner practitioner practitioner possesses provides practitioner
shows basic demonstrates exhibits knowledge in innovative pioneers
knowledge in basic knowledge in the related field solutions to ground-
the related knowledge in the related and can complex breaking
field and can the related field and can provide industry issues. solutions,
identify some field and can identify solutions to setting
solutions to identify some specific issues within industry
industry solutions to solutions to the industry. standards.
issues. industry industry
issues. issues.
PEO2 The The The The practitioner The practitioner The
practitioner practitioner practitioner adopts relevant consistently practitioner
learns basic follows basic adheres to procedures and employs utilizes
procedures procedures procedures uses advanced cutting-edge
and uses and utilises and utilizes digital/informati procedures and technology
digital/informa digital/informa digital/informa on technologies technology for and
tion tion tion and optimal procedures
technologies technologies technologies quantitative decision- for decision-
and and and information for making. making.
quantitative quantitative quantitative effective
information for information for information for decision-
decision- decision- decision- making.
making. making. making.
PEO3 The The The The practitioner The practitioner The
practitioner practitioner practitioner leads leads as an practitioner
works with leads leads specific collaborations adept leader leads as an
others and occasional collaborations with others as and effectively exemplary
communicate collaborations with others an effective communicates leader,
s information with others and leader and complex driving
politely to and communicate communicates information to strategic
stakeholders. communicate s information information diverse initiatives
s information professionally professionally stakeholders. with
professionally to to seamless
to stakeholders. stakeholders. communicati
stakeholders. on.
PEO4 The The The The practitioner The practitioner The
practitioner practitioner practitioner adheres to integrates practitioner
understands follows observes ethical, social, ethical is visionary
ethical, social, ethical, social, ethical, social, cultural, and considerations by
5
Bachelor/ Masters/
Advanced Graduate Postgraduate
Certificate Diploma Doctoral
Diploma Certificate/ Certificate/
(Level 3, (Level 4, (Level 8,
(Level 5, Graduate Postgraduate
MQF) MQF) MQF)
MQF) Diploma Diploma
(Level 6, MQF) (Level 7, MQF)
cultural and cultural, and cultural, and professional into integrating
professional professional professional codes of entrepreneurial ethical
codes of codes of codes of practice while endeavours, principles
practice while practice while practice while engaging in setting a into
exploring engaging in engaging in entrepreneurial standard for entrepreneur
entrepreneuri entrepreneuri entrepreneuri activities for others. ial ventures
al activities for al activities for al activities for career and shaping
career career career development industry
development development development and ethics.
and and and advancement.
advancement. advancement. advancement.
1
Malaysian Qualifications Agency (2017). Malaysian Qualifications Framework 2 nd Edition. Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
6
3. Functional work skills, with focuses on:
a. Practical skills
b. Interpersonal skills
c. Communication skills
d. Digital skills
e. Numeracy skills
f. Leadership, autonomy, and responsibility
4. Personal and entrepreneurial skills
5. Ethics and professionalism
Table 2.2 shows the mapping of learning outcomes based on the MQF learning
outcomes for general programmes. The flexibility in describing the learning
outcomes remains with the HEPs, provided they are sufficiently covered.
7
Table 2.2: Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) based on MQF 2.0’s Learning Outcomes (LO) for General Programmes
MQF 2.0
PLO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
8
Assist leaders in demonstrating basic independence to cultivate
*
leadership abilities within group settings. (A2)
MQF 2.0
PLO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
9
Share ideas verbally and non-verbally to diverse audiences in
*
various contexts. (A3)
MQF 2.0
PLO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
10
Apply relevant concepts for basic solutions and decisions within
*
the related field. (C3)
11
BACHELOR’S DEGREE/ GRADUATE CERTIFICATE/GRADUATE DIPLOMA (LEVEL 6, MQF)
At the end of the programme, graduates will be able to:
MQF 2.0
PLO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12
Adopt entrepreneurial skills and knowledge for innovative
*
ventures within the related field. (A3)
MQF 2.0
PLO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
13
Display advanced digital/information technologies for
*
organizational transformation within the related field. (A5)
MQF 2.0
PLO 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
0
Interpret advanced knowledge within the related field across diverse
*
global contexts. (C6)
14
Adapt advanced practical-related work skills in complex professional
*
activities within the related field. (P6)
1-Knowledge and Understanding; 2-Cognitive Skills; 3-Practical Skills; 4-Interpersonal Skills; 5-Communication Skills; 6-Digital Skills; 7-Numeracy Skills;
8-Leadership, Autonomy and Responsibility; 9-Personal Skills; 10-Entrepreneurial Skills; 11-Ethics and Professionalism.
15
Note:
1. *At the postgraduate level, entrepreneurial skills go beyond essential business acumen. They involve a profound understanding
of integrating knowledge gained through academic study with the practical application of that knowledge to create new ideas,
innovative solutions and robust systems.
2. The total number of PLOs does not have to be eleven (11), but they must align with all Malaysian Qualifications Framework
Learning Outcome Domain (LOD) and be mapped clearly.
3. The PEOs and PLOs have been mapped using comprehensive insights from leading economic research organizations and
reports on the future of work. These sources analyse global workforce trends, technological advancements, industry changes
and essential skills, illustrating how automation, digital transformation, demographic shifts and economic changes shape future
jobs globally and in Malaysia. This alignment ensures that our PEOs and PLOs effectively meet current and future employment
demands.
16
2.3 CURRICULUM DESIGN AND DELIVERY2
Learning and teaching can only be effective when the curriculum content and the
programme structure are kept abreast with the most current development in the field of
study (COPPA 2nd Edition, 2017). The curriculum structure should identify the objectives
and learning outcomes of the programme and incorporate a schema that would map the
curriculum to the stated objectives and learning outcomes (Guidelines to Good Practice:
Curriculum Design and Delivery, 2011).
This section outlines the minimum credits of each curriculum component for all levels of
qualifications as stated in Table 2.3. HEPs have the flexibility to design their
programmes. However, they should cover the core areas within the programme.
In addition, HEPs are encouraged to develop their programmes to reflect the current
best practices and offer a high-quality academic programme. General programmes may
vary in their nomenclature; however, the programme nomenclature must reflect the
content of the programme as indicated in the MQF.
2
Standards in this area are best read together with the Guidelines to Good Practices: Curriculum Design and
Delivery, which is available on the MQA Portal: www.mqa.gov.my.
17
Aligning closely with current and projected industry requirements, the credit distributions
ensure that graduates are well-prepared for employment and poised to make
meaningful contributions from day one in their respective fields. Any remaining credits
can be strategically allocated within specified categories to fulfil the minimum
requirements, granting autonomy to shape the programme's direction. This approach
enhances flexibility and maintains adherence to essential benchmarks, empowering
educators to effectively tailor programmes to meet diverse educational goals and
evolving industry demands.
Table 2.3: Minimum credits of each curriculum component for all levels of
qualifications
18
Core ** (may include discipline core) 26
Elective**** (optional) 0
Sub Total Credit 32
To complete the minimum requirement of 40 credits, the remaining credits can be
placed in any of the category above
Graduating Credit 40
19
POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA (LEVEL 7, MQF)
Components Credits
Core (may include discipline core) 15
Final Year Project 0
Industrial Training** 0
Elective*** (optional) 0
Sub Total Credit 15
To complete the minimum requirement of 30 credits, the remaining credits can be
placed in any of the category above
Graduating Credit 30
Notes:
1. *Compulsory Modules refer to Mata Pelajaran Pengajian Umum (MPU) courses,
which are mandatory. Please refer to Garis Panduan Mata Pelajaran Pengajian
Umum (MPU) Edisi Kedua for the minimum credit requirement as stipulated by
the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). The HEP has the option to offer its
own compulsory courses in addition to the general courses.
2. **Industrial training is OPTIONAL for the HEP to offer. If industrial training is
offered, the minimum recommendation is 6 credit hours (3 months). Industrial
training must be in a relevant industry and is allocated at a minimum number
according to the formula of 1 credit = 2 weeks of training. It is suggested to be
placed during the final semester.
3. ***Electives can be non-discipline related courses. Flexibility is given to HEPs to
determine the appropriate credit
20
MASTER’S DEGREE by MIXED MODE (LEVEL 7, MQF)
Components Credits
Core 12
Dissertation 20
Electives 0
Sub Total Credit 32
To complete the minimum requirement of 40 credits, the remaining credits can be
placed in any of the category above*
Graduating Credit 40
21
DOCTORAL DEGREE by RESEARCH (LEVEL 8, MQF)
Components Percentage (%) Credits
Thesis 100 No credit value given
Notes:
1. For comprehensive insights into curriculum design and delivery at these levels, it
is recommended to review the Standards: Master’s and Doctoral Degree, 2nd
Edition, accessible on the MQA Portal.
2. The coursework requirements should encompass both theoretical and research
methodology courses. Students are required to have completed a research
methodology course that covers various approaches, methods, and analyses
relevant to their field or discipline. Alternatively, they must provide evidence of
attending equivalent courses that support research in their chosen field(s) or
relevant prerequisite modules as required.
3. *For mixed-mode programmes, the ratio of coursework to dissertation falls within
the range of 50:50, 40:60, or 30:70. For example, in a Master's degree by mixed
mode, to complete the minimum requirement of 40 credits, the remaining credits
can be distributed according to these ratios. If the core coursework is 12 credits
and the dissertation is 20 credits, you can adjust the ratio within the specified
ranges as follows:
a. 50:50 Ratio: Core: 20 credits & Dissertation: 20 credits
b. 40:60 Ratio: Core coursework: 14 credits & Dissertation: 26credits
c. 30:70 Ratio: Core coursework: 12 credits & Dissertation: 28 credits
4. For Doctoral Degree by Retrospective or Prior Publication and Doctoral Degree by
Concurrent or Prospective Publication, refer to the Standards: Master’s and
Doctoral Degree, 2nd edition.
22
3. ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING3
3
Standards in this area are best read together with the Guidelines to Good Practices: Assessment of Students, which
is available on the MQA Portal: www.mqa.gov.my.
23
vi. The HEP must ensure academic integrity is adhered especially when generative
artificial intelligence is incorporated in students’ assessment. Consequently,
alternative and authentic assessment should be considered and practiced; and
vii. The HEP must have clear marking guidelines such as assessment rubrics,
marking schemes, and others for continuous and final assessments to indicate
the achievement of course learning outcomes and the assigned programme
learning outcome.
The percentages of continuous and final assessments for a course at each level of study
are presented in Table 3 as an example. The HEP has the autonomy to decide on
appropriate percentages for continuous and final assessments, with justification. The
suggested forms of assessments indicated are merely examples. HEPs are encouraged
to use various methods and tools suitable for measuring learning outcomes and
competencies. The selection of assessment methods must be related and relevant to
the programme delivery and offering mode chosen by the programme owner.
24
Postgraduate ● Expert-based
Diploma (Level 7,
Assessment
MQF)
(Academic &
Master’s Degree 30 – 70 30 – 70
Industry)
by Mixed Mode
(Level 7, MQF) ● Field Work
Master’s Degree 0 100 ● Final Year Project
by Research
(Dissertation) ● Graduate Seminar
(Level 7, MQF)
● Internship Report
Doctoral Degree 30 – 70 30 – 70
by Coursework ● Logbook
(Level 8, MQF) ● Oral Presentation
Doctoral Degree 30 – 70 30 – 70 ● Peer Assessment
by Mixed-Mode ● Portfolio or e-portfolio
(Level 8, MQF)
● Project Proposal
Doctoral Degree 0 100 (Thesis) ● Proposal Defence
by Research
(Level 8, MQF) ● Quiz
● Reflective Report
● Research Project
● Research Proposal
● Simulation
● Test
● Thesis/Dissertation
● Virtual Online
Assessment
● Viva voce
● Workshop
Notes:
i. Standards in this area are best read together with the Guidelines to Good
Practices: Assessment of Students, which is available on the MQA Portal:
www.mqa.gov.my.
ii. For comprehensive insights into assessment of student learning at the
postgraduate level, it is recommended to review the Standards: Master’s and
Doctoral Degree, 2nd Edition, accessible on the MQA Portal
25
iii. For Doctoral Degree by Retrospective or Prior Publication and Doctoral Degree
by Concurrent or Prospective Publication, refer to the Standards: Master’s and
Doctoral Degree 2nd Edition.
iv. The HEPs should have a clear policy on the criteria for the appointment of
external and internal examiners for dissertation/thesis assessment at
postgraduate levels.
v. The composition of the dissertation/thesis examiners should meet the
requirements of the Standards: Master’s and Doctoral Degree, 2 nd Edition.
vi. The robustness and security of the processes and procedures related to student
assessment are crucial in inspiring confidence in the quality of the qualifications
awarded by the HEP. Please refer to section 3.2.3, Management of Student
Assessment, in the Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation, 2nd Edition
(2017) for more details.
26
4. STUDENT SELECTION
This section of the PS relates to the selection of students for programmes of study.
“In general, admission to a programme needs to comply with the prevailing policies of
the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). There are varying views on the best method
of student’s selection. Whatever method is used, the HEP must be able to defend the
consistency of the method it utilises. The number of students to be admitted to a
programme is determined by the capacity of the HEP and the number of qualified
applicants. HEP admission and retention policies must not be compromised for the sole
purpose of maintaining the desired enrolment. If a HEP operates geographically
separated campuses or if the programme is a collaborative one, the selection and
assignment of all students must be consistent with national policies.” (COPPA 2nd
Edition, 2017)
The standards for the selection of students into programmes within this programme
standard (PS) are formulated by keeping in mind the generic national higher education
policies pertaining to minimum student entry requirements.
28
ENGLISH
COMPETENCY
LEVEL ENTRY REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT
(INTERNATIONAL
STUDENT)
30
ENGLISH
COMPETENCY
LEVEL ENTRY REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT
(INTERNATIONAL
STUDENT)
MASTER’S i. A Bachelor’s degree (Level Achieve a minimum
DEGREE BY 6, MQF) in related fields with Band 4 in MUET OR
MIXED MODE AND a minimum CGPA of 2.75 or equivalent to
BY RESEARCH equivalent, as accepted by Common European
(LEVEL 7, MQF) the HEP Senate; Framework of
OR reference for
ii. A Bachelor’s degree (Level Languages (CEFR)
6, MQF) in related fields or Low B2.
equivalent with a minimum
CGPA of 2.00 and not If a student does not
meeting a CGPA of 2.75 can meet this
be accepted subject to requirement, the HEP
rigorous internal must offer English
assessment; OR proficiency courses to
iii. Other qualifications ensure that the
equivalent to a Bachelor’s student’s proficiency
degree (Level 6, MQF) is sufficient to meet
recognised by the the needs of the
Government of Malaysia programme.
must undergo *rigorous
internal assessment as The HEP can also opt
determined by the HEP. (the for additional
requirement of CGPA is assessment
based on item i – ii) according to the HEP
requirement.
DOCTORAL i. A Master’s degree (Level 7, Achieve a minimum
DEGREE BY MQF) in related fields with a Band 4 in MUET OR
COURSEWORK, minimum CGPA of 3.00 or equivalent to
BY MIXED MODE equivalent, as accepted by Common European
AND BY the HEP Senate; Framework of
RESEARCH OR reference for
(LEVEL 8, MQF) ii. A Master’s degree (Level 7, Languages (CEFR)
MQF) in related fields or Mid B2.
equivalent with a minimum
CGPA of 2.75 can be If a student does not
accepted. The candidates meet this
must undergo appropriate requirement, the HEP
prerequisite courses as must offer English
determined by the HEP; proficiency courses to
OR ensure that the
iii. A Master’s degree (Level 7, student’s proficiency
MQF) in related fields or is sufficient to meet
equivalent with a minimum the needs of the
CGPA of 2.50 can be programme.
accepted subject to a
minimum of FIVE (5) years of The HEP can also opt
working experience in the for additional
31
ENGLISH
COMPETENCY
LEVEL ENTRY REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT
(INTERNATIONAL
STUDENT)
related fields and rigorous assessment
internal assessment as according to the HEP
determined by the HEP; requirement.
OR
iv. Any other Master’s degree
(Level 7, MQF) with a
minimum CGPA of 2.75 can
be accepted subject to a
minimum FIVE (5) years of
working experience in
related fields. The
candidates must undergo
*rigorous internal
assessment as determined
by the HEP;
OR
v. Other qualifications
equivalent to a Master’s
degree (Level 7, MQF)
recognised by the
Government of Malaysia
must undergo *rigorous
internal assessment as
determined by the HEP. (the
requirement of CGPA is
based on item i – iv).
Notes:
i. For candidates who have not passed the rigorous internal assessment, the HEP
can determine for the candidate to be re-assessed for entry to the programme to
pass preparatory courses as determined by the HEP before entering the
programme, and subject to the HEP Senate / Academic Board’s approval.
ii. * A rigorous internal assessment of candidates' work experiences will determine
the necessity of prerequisite courses. If the assessment meets the established
criteria, candidates may be exempted from these courses. This evaluation
considers cumulative experience, even from before acquiring the required
qualification for the particular level of study, provided the experience is related to
both the level and content of the study. The thorough evaluation of an applicant's
32
suitability for a programme through statements of purpose, interviews and other
methods should encompass the following criteria:
This comprehensive assessment ensures that only the most qualified candidates
are selected, reinforcing the integrity and excellence of the programme.
iii. HEP defines appropriate interventions for students-at-risk. These may include
offering bridging, enhancement, or reinforcement courses related to the
programme, which can be incorporated within or outside the curriculum structure.
iv. Bachelor’s degree candidates who are registered for Master’s degree
programmes may apply to convert to the Doctoral degree programmes subject
to the requirements in the Standards: Master’s and Doctoral Degree, 2 nd edition,
accessible on the MQA Portal.
v. Bachelor’s degree candidates who are applying to doctoral programmes are
subject to the requirements in the Standard Master’s and Doctoral Degree, 2nd
edition.
vi. For Doctoral Degree by Retrospective or Prior Publication and Doctoral Degree
by Concurrent or Prospective Publication, refer to the Standards: Master’s and
Doctoral Degree, 2nd edition.
vii. Refer to Surat JPT GS 1000/630 Jld 3 (12) 6th March 2023 – Syarat Kompetensi
Bahasa Inggeris Kepada Pelajar Antarabangsa for equivalent English language
assessments and scores.
viii. For Public Universities, refer to Surat JPT.S(BPKP)2000/400/04/01 Jld.5(53),
20th November, 2019 - Pindaan syarat kelayakan minimum (Syarat am) Diploma
TVET (DKM, DLKM, DVM) sebagai syarat kelayakan masuk ke program Ijazah
Sarjana Muda di Universiti Awam (UA).
33
ix. For Private Higher Educational Institutions: Refer to Surat JPT/GS 1000-606 Jld.
2(23), 21st April, 2020 - Kemasukan Pelajar Lulusan Diploma Kemahiran
Malaysia (DKM), Diploma Lanjutan Kemahiran Malaysia (DLKM) dan Diploma
Vokasional Malaysia (DVM) ke Peringkat Sarjana Muda (Tahap 6 MQF) atau
yang setara dengannya di Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta.
34
5. ACADEMIC STAFF4
“As the quality of the academic staff is one of the most important components in assuring
the quality of higher education, a HEP is expected to search for and appoint the best-
suited candidates, to serve its programmes, in an open, transparent and fair manner.
To achieve this, HEPs are expected to design and implement an academic staff search
and recruitment practice that is as efficient as it is effective to achieve the desired
results. Every programme must have an appropriately qualified and sufficient number
of academic staff, working in a conducive environment that attracts talented individuals.
The numbers recruited have to be adequate for, and appropriate to, the needs of the
programmes. The role of the academic staff in various activities has to be clarified in
order to reflect a fair distribution of responsibilities. It is important for the HEP to provide
a continuous staff development programme for its academic staff, for them to be current
in their knowledge and skills, both in their chosen discipline as well as in their
pedagogical skills.” (COPPA 2nd Edition, 2017)
Table 5.1 provides the minimum requirements of the qualifications of academic staff
and relevant staff ratios for the various MQF qualification levels. Besides possessing
qualifications in the related field, HEPs must also ensure that academic staff are
assigned courses based on their areas of expertise or relevant industry experience.
4
Standards in this area are best read together with the Guidelines to Good Practices: Academic Staff and the
Guidelines: Academic Staff Workload, which are available on the MQA Portal, www.mqa.gov.my.
35
attachment in a
related field.
Staff-student ratio
● Overall academic
staff-student ratio –
1:30
● Programme which
have more practical
skill, academic staff-
student ratio 1:20
36
attachment in a
relevant field.
Staff-student ratio
● Overall academic
staff-student ratio –
1:30
● Programme which
have more practical
skill, academic staff-
student ratio 1: 20
Staff-student ratio
● Overall staff-student
ratio – 1:30
● Programme which
have more practical
skill, academic staff-
student ratio 1: 20
37
● A Bachelor’s degree (Level 6, structured supervisor
MQF) in a relevant field AND training.
at least TEN (10) years of ● Staff-student ratio
experience in related field at a (Coursework):
level appropriate for courses ● Academic staff-
to teach practical / student ratio – 1:15.
professional / hands-on ● Academic staff-
components (the programme student ratio – 1:10
should not employ more than (project and
30% of the staff in this dissertation
category). supervision).
38
appropriate for the
dissertation.
By Research
(Principal supervisor)
● A Doctoral degree (Level 8,
MQF) in related field; OR
● A Master’s degree (Level 7,
MQF) in relevant field AND at
least FIVE (5) years of
teaching experience and
research and has co-
supervised master’s
candidate.
(Co-supervisor)
● A Doctoral degree (Level 8,
MQF) in related fields; OR
● A Master’s degree (Level 7,
MQF) in relevant fields AND
at least ONE (1) year of
teaching experience including
experience in research /
project consultation / industry
experience and required
approval of the HEP Senate.
(Co-Supervisor)
● A Doctoral degree (Level 8,
MQF) in a relevant field; OR
● A Master’s degree (Level 7,
MQF) with extensive
experience in research and
subject to the approval of the
Senate of the HEP; OR
● A Master’s degree (Level 7,
MQF) with at least TEN (10)
years of experience in the
relevant field; AND
● The supervisors must go
through
structured supervisor training.
40
Notes:
i. A candidate without a Bachelor’s degree (Level 6, MQF) but with a Master’s
degree (Level 7, MQF) obtained through the APEL.A route may be accepted
as academic staff by considering the related industry experience gained.
ii. Experience can be cumulative experience even before acquiring the required
qualification for a particular level of study, however, it must be related to the
level and content of the study.
iii. The staff (instructor/facilitator/tutor) to student ratio for the Open and Distance
Learning (ODL) programme must be suitable for the learning-teaching
methods and adhere to the discipline, while also considering the uniqueness
and flexibility of ODL. Please refer to the Code of Practice for Programme
Accreditation: ODL (COPPA: ODL) for more details.
iv. Supervisors must undergo a structured training program tailored for
postgraduate supervision. This comprehensive training should elucidate the
roles, responsibilities, expectations, policies, and regulations of the HEP.
Additionally, it should address the interpersonal challenges of managing
personal, cultural, academic and intellectual issues. This can be achieved
through various methods, ensuring supervisors are well-equipped to guide
their students effectively and uphold the highest standards of academic
integrity and support.
v. Please refer to Surat Makluman MQA Bil. 7/2014 – Garis Panduan Beban Staf
Akademik for general guidelines on staff workload and staff-student ratio. You
may utilize either the staff-student ratio framework outlined previously or the
one provided in Surat Makluman MQA Bil. 7/2014 – Garis Panduan Beban
Staf Akademik.
41
The HEPs must commit to providing staff with development opportunities to ensure that
their staff are able to contribute fully to their vision and mission. Therefore, the HEPs
must provide the academic staff with at least 40 hours per year of Continuous
Professional Development (CPD) programmes to enhance their expertise and skills
in pedagogy for teaching, learning, assessment, research, technology literacy and
current trends. The CPD may include participating in training, workshops and
conferences; pursuing academic / professional qualifications; engaging in self-directed
studies; coaching / mentoring / tutoring; and performing industrial attachments,
consultancies and community services. Part-time and / or contract staff should also be
considered in the CPD programmes.
42
6. EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
“Adequate educational resources are necessary to support the teaching and learning
activities of a programme. These include all the required academic and instructional
expertise, physical facilities, information and communication technologies, research
facilities and finance.” (COPPA 2nd Edition, 2017)
HEPs are required to provide sufficient resources conducive to supporting teaching and
learning in the field. Lecture and tutorial rooms, technical support / facilities and
sufficient space to accommodate student-centred learning must be provided according
to the current needs. For research in postgraduate programmes, candidates should be
provided with a conducive work area. However, educational resources recommended
for related programmes as listed are the minimum requirement provided by HEPs but
not limited to those resources only, depending on respective programmes.
Students with special needs and those facing personal, relationship or identity problems
can be assisted through special-purpose facilities and professional counselling. Refer
to Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Dasar Inklusif Orang Kurang Upaya di Institusi
Pendidikan Tinggi (2019) dan Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM).
43
xi. Sufficient financial allocation for exhibition / publication / conference
xii. Student lounge (near to student working space)
xiii. Postgraduate room
xiv. Facilities and equipment for students with special needs
xv. ODL programme must have sufficient and appropriate physical and virtual
facilities (electronic learning platform) and educational resources to ensure its
effective delivery, including facilities for practical-based and research
programmes and for those with special needs.
All above-mentioned facilities must meet the minimum health and safety standards and
special needs.
All programmes run by the HEP must have the appropriate reading references and
materials accessible to the staff and students and must be available in the HEP’s library
or resource room.
The programme must have sufficient, relevant and appropriate physical facilities and
training resources at the commencement of the programme to ensure its effective
delivery, including facilities for practical-based programmes and those with special
needs.
All shared facilities between the industry and HEPs in accordance to the requirements
of the programme as stated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) /
Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) / Letter of Agreement (LoA) must be verified and
approved by MQA.
44
7. PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT
“There are many ways of administering an educational institution and the methods of
management differ between Higher Education Providers (HEPs). Nevertheless,
governance that reflects the collective leadership of an academic organisation must
emphasise excellence and scholarship. At the departmental level, it is crucial that the
leadership provides clear guidelines and directions, builds relationships amongst the
different constituents based on collegiality and transparency, manages finances and
other resources with accountability, forges a partnership with significant stakeholders in
educational delivery, teaching and consultancy, and dedicates itself to academic and
scholarly endeavours. Whilst formalised arrangements can protect these relationships,
they are best developed by a culture of reciprocity, mutuality and open communication.”
(COPPA 2nd Edition, 2017)
This document will not raise issues pertaining to governance and administration as
these are at the institutional level rather than the programme level. In this PS, academic
leadership is largely focused on suitably qualified persons in the respective field to carry
out the necessary curriculum monitoring, review and assessment. The leaders of the
programmes should demonstrate knowledge of the field and the attributes of good
ethical values in work practices. It is advisable that leaders of programmes have industry
experience or relevant professional certification.
OR
46
field with at least one of the qualifications must
be in a discipline of the programme and FIVE
(5) years of teaching experience, with at least
six (6) months of working at the HEP;
OR
Note:
i. The appointment for the Management of the Faculty, Academic Centre,
Department, School, etc., requires the HEP’s to document the process of
appointments accordingly as a policy paper to support its structural frameworks
and represent appropriately towards the governing of the programme.
ii. Experience can be cumulative experience even before acquiring the required
qualification for a particular level of study. However, the experience must be
related to the level of study as well as the content.
47
8. PROGRAMME MONITORING, REVIEW AND CONTINUAL QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT5
5
Standards in this area are best read together with the Guidelines to Good Practices: Monitoring, Reviewing and
Continually Improving Institutional Quality and the Guidelines on Terms Used for External Examiner, External Advisor
and Advisory Board, which are available on the MQA Portal: www.mqa.gov.my.
48
“Comprehensive monitoring and review of the programme for its improvement are
to be carried out with a proper mechanism, considering feedback from various
parties and the stakeholders. The committee responsible for this should be granted
adequate autonomy to carry out its responsibility effectively. It is desirable that the
departments work in association with the HEP’s central Quality Assurance Unit to
ensure objectivity.” (COPPA 2nd Edition, 2017)
The HEPs are expected to provide evidence of their ability to keep pace with the
changes in the field of related area or expert and the requirements of the
stakeholders. These may be demonstrated by, but are not limited, to the following:
i. The department must have a Quality Assurance (QA) unit for internal quality
assurance of the department to work hand-in-hand with the QA unit of the
HEP;
ii. A comprehensive curriculum review should be conducted at least once every
3 to 5 years. However, updating the curriculum to keep pace with current
developments should be conducted at more regular intervals;
iii. Compulsory appointment of external advisors and examiners (academicians)
who are qualified in the related fields to assure the quality of the students of
the Bachelor’s degree (Level 6, MQF) and above programmes;
iv. Continual benchmarking against top universities at the national and
international levels.
v. Linkages with related professional bodies, government agencies and
industry;
vi. Engagement with industry practitioners through appointment as a member of
the Board of Studies, appointment of adjunct positions, guest speakers; etc
vii. Annual dialogue sessions with stakeholders;
viii. Active participation of academic staff at relevant conferences, seminars,
workshops and short courses;
ix. Presentations by invited speakers, local or international;
x. Organising conferences, seminars and workshops;
xi. Encouraging international exchange among students and staff;
xii. Continuous review of industrial attachment practices and records.
49
REFERENCES
Ministry of Higher Education (2016). Garis Panduan Mata Pelajaran Pengajian Umum
(MPU) Edisi Kedua. Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Ministry of Higher Education (2017). Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Mod Pengajian 2u2i.
Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Surat Makluman MQA Bil. 7/2014 – Garis Panduan Beban Staf Akademik, rujukan
(MQA100-1/7/2(9)), dated 1st October 2014.
50
APPENDIX 1
Faculty of Education,
Prof. Dr. Sharipah Ruzaina Syed Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
1. Aris
Chairman
School of Arts,
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zuhaili Akmal Sunway University
2. Ismail
Standard Writer
Head of Engineering,
8. Mr. Ricky Liew Chee Leong
SR Aviation Sdn Bhd
51
APPENDIX 2
52
GLOSSARY
53
6. Final Assessment The last activity students must complete in a
course. A final assessment may be an exam, a
culminating activity or a combination of the two.
This task assesses students’ knowledge of a
subject and may be cumulative. A final
assessment is similar in nature to a summative
assessment, which includes end-of-unit tests,
standardised testing and cumulative work, such
as curating a portfolio over the duration of a
course. For more information, refer to Table 12,
Management of Student Assessment and
Process, in the Guidelines to Good Practices:
Assessment of Student Learning, 2nd Edition
(2023).
54
volume to achieve the stated learning outcomes.
This usually leads to an award of a qualification.
Each programme must have PEOs and PLOs
and must be measured progressively.
11. Programme Educational Broad statements that describe the career and
Objective professional accomplishments that the
programme is preparing graduates to achieve
after they have graduated.
55
the main focus of the qualification or programme,
but still provides knowledge or skills that are
complementary or beneficial to the overall
educational goals. It signifies that while not
directly related, the field enhances the
understanding or application of the qualification
in a broader context.
16. Rigorous Internal A process to evaluate the suitability of an
Assessment applicant for the programme with the purpose
that covers the following criteria:
i. Demonstration of candidates’ academic
and personal development experience in
the relevant fields for the required basic
skills and acquired knowledge of the
programme.
ii. The aptitude of the candidate suited
towards the provided programme through
these recommended measured tests (list
is not limited to): Interview or formulated
assessments for Verbal Reasoning,
Diagrammatic Reasoning, Situational
Judgement, E-tray Exercise, Error
Checking, Personality Tests, Cognitive
Ability, Spatial Awareness.
iii. These assessments can be done via
conventional meet or online (both
synchronous or asynchronous manners)
56
guiding the academic inquiry with clear
structured arguments in support of the
proposition. HEP may outline the rigorous
assessment as part of the student selection and
need to submit the documentation to MQA for
approval.
17. Thesis Documentation of the original research prepared
and submitted by the candidate for the award of
the degree for doctoral programmes by research
and mixed mode.
18. Viva Voce An oral examination of students’ communication
skills and knowledge of relevant facts from their
thesis or dissertation.
57