IMCAC007
IMCAC007
IMCA’s mission is to improve performance in the marine contracting industry. Our value proposition is to influence
our industry in key technical, contractual, policy and regulatory matters that are in the collective best interest of
the marine contracting industry.
For over 25 years IMCA has maintained an important body of knowledge to assist our industry in the form of
published guidance documents promoting good practice across a wide range of technical and professional
disciplines. Documents have a self-explanatory title and are catalogued using a code containing letters and
numbers. The letter indicates the discipline, and the number is simply sequential within that discipline.
Members are expected to adopt as a minimum standard the technical guidelines (published documents, information
notes and other materials) produced by the Association appropriate to the technical division(s) and region(s) to which
the relevant Member belongs.
Legal Notice
IMCA’s store terms and conditions are available at https://www.imca-int.com/legal-notices/terms/ and apply to
all downloads from IMCA’s website, including this document.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in the documents it publishes,
but IMCA shall not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained. The
information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual’s or Member’s legal, regulatory
or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible
for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Feedback – If you have any comments on this document, please email us: [email protected]
Version History
Date Reason Revision
April 2024 Document quality review – preface and layout updated; no change to content Rev. 2.1
March 2017 To expand on the scope of the document Rev. 2
April 2013 To add more information to the previous version Rev. 1
December 2000 Initial publication
Guidance on Assessor Training
Table of Contents
1 Scope .........................................................................................................................4
2 Assessors and Their Role ............................................................................................5
3 Assessor Training........................................................................................................6
3.1 Company Assessment Set-up and Systems .........................................................................6
3.1.1 Standards of Competence Being Assessed .............................................................6
3.1.2 Assessment Methods Being Used ...........................................................................6
3.1.3 Documents Used Within the Assessment Set-Up ...................................................6
3.1.4 Company Competence Assurance Systems ............................................................6
3.2 Assessment Process .............................................................................................................7
3.2.1 Planning Assessments .............................................................................................7
3.2.2 Conducting Assessments Using Different Methods................................................7
3.2.3 Recording And Reporting Assessment Decisions ....................................................7
3.2.4 Providing Feedback and Ongoing Support..............................................................7
3.3 Quality Assurance and Internal Verification ........................................................................8
4 Assessor Training Challenges ......................................................................................9
5 Providing Support and Advice ................................................................................... 10
1 Scope
This document aims to provide a checklist of the topics to be considered for inclusion in an assessor
training programme and the appropriate auditing arrangements for such programmes.
IMCA Competence Assurance & Assessment guidance, originally launched in January 1999 and
updated in 2003, 2009 and 2012, was designed to contribute to improved safety in the offshore
industry by providing an assurance framework for members to assure the competence of their safety-
critical personnel. Such is the nature of international or national health and safety legislation and
industry expectation, that personnel in safety-critical roles are now formally assessed on an
appropriately routine basis to ensure their competence is sustained and skill fade is minimised.
A competent workforce is more productive, operates with reduced risk, has shorter periods of
downtime and fewer injuries. At the same time, there is need for a practical but robust assessment
procedure to be in place against which the workforce’s skills, forethought and judgement can be
measured.
As employees receive training, they broaden their skill base, and then gain experience or attain more
professional knowledge through practical application of their skills. However, to counter skill fade and
the risk of acquiring bad or poor work practices there is a requirement to routinely assess, test or
examine both currency and competence against specific criteria based on job functions. Those
responsible for conducting professional competence assessments clearly require some direction,
guidance and training on how to carry out this responsibility equitably and consistently.
As part of the IMCA Competence Assurance & Assessment framework, it is recommended that
companies develop suitable auditing arrangements to ensure that assessors apply the assessment
criteria in a coherent and appropriate manner.
The IMCA Competence Assurance & Assessment framework employs a range of criteria including
certification and qualification processes, demonstrable experience, assessment of technical skills and
appropriate initial and refresher training.
The IMCA Competence Assessment & Assurance framework recommends that all safety-critical
personnel demonstrate that they have the required currency and competences for their specific job
function as set out in the documentation. This can be effectively done by work place assessors.
Some organisations employ or engage with specialist personnel such as training specialists or third
party assessors. The advice offered within this document focuses on the role and training requirements
of all assessors.
To carry out assessments successfully, both the person being assessed and the assessor need to be
familiar with the assessment process and what is required of them. The following points are normally
considered to be good practice for assessors and companies operating assessment processes as a part
of their competence assurance schemes. The assessor should:
communicate with the job holder about the assessment process; this includes letting the job
holder know:
− about the standard of competence being assessed
− how the job holder will demonstrate competence against these standards, and
− how their competence will be documented
ensure that activities used for evidence are at an appropriate level and not too basic or too
advanced for the position being assessed
work with the person being assessed to gather and record evidence in line with the assessment
process being followed; in most cases this requires ‘on the job’ observation and assessment
provide the person being assessed with clear and accurate feedback on any assessment
conducted
be trained to carry out assessments and familiarised with company systems and procedures
relevant to the assessment process.
3 Assessor Training
IMCA does not approve or formally recognise any particular assessor training course or programme.
The type of training given to an assessor is for each IMCA member to determine. The guidance
provided below includes topics which could be contained in an assessor training programme. It is not
intended that this be used as a training document; rather it provides a checklist on topics the company
should consider for inclusion and companies should tailor their training programmes to meet their
specific need.
These should cover relevant direct and indirect methods of assessment that are being
used within the set-up:
direct methods include observation, questioning, discussion and simulation
indirect methods include witness testimony, examination of work
products/records, candidate reports and recognised prior learning (RPL) or
professional qualification.
The company’s assessment process and procedures should be covered during the training and
should include the following areas.
Familiarisation with the company’s arrangements for ensuring quality assurance including
internal verification/audit is important, as are internal communication arrangements for
assessors.
Verifiers should:
ensure that there is a uniform and consistent approach to the assessment process
be confident that all assessors are assessing and applying competence guidelines to the
same standard
provide support, advice and guidance to assessors when required
ensure that all assessments and records are accurate and complete
possess a sound knowledge of the subject matter and the assessment process.
The guidance in this document may be used to tailor an ‘assessors’ training programme’ that better
meets the needs of the operational context of the company, to equip assessors with the basic skills
and abilities to carry out assessments. This could be delivered either in-house or by a recognised
training provider.
Where supervisors or line managers are being asked to fulfil the role of assessor, companies should
recognise that not all individuals in these roles will be naturally able to carry out assessments as
described in this guidance and that short training programmes might not meet the needs of some
individuals. Similarly, some individuals may find it difficult in being objective with their own
professional peer group.
Some companies address this challenge by putting internal quality assurance or internal verification
processes in place and focus on supporting assessors rather than a traditional auditing approach.
The provision of assessor guidelines and also the opportunity to review other completed assessments
(as a form of standardisation) can also be useful in achieving a more consistent level of assessment.