The document discusses the concept of power sharing in political science, emphasizing its importance in conflict resolution among diverse social groups. It outlines different forms of power sharing, such as horizontal and vertical distribution among government organs and levels, and highlights case studies of Belgium and Sri Lanka to illustrate the consequences of power dynamics. The text concludes by asserting that power sharing is both prudential for stability and moral for democratic governance.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views
power sharing ppp
The document discusses the concept of power sharing in political science, emphasizing its importance in conflict resolution among diverse social groups. It outlines different forms of power sharing, such as horizontal and vertical distribution among government organs and levels, and highlights case studies of Belgium and Sri Lanka to illustrate the consequences of power dynamics. The text concludes by asserting that power sharing is both prudential for stability and moral for democratic governance.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11
Class 10th political life by
Imtiyaz sir ( life leisure and
study)
Unit 1st Power sharing
Starting with the introduction to the
political science What do we mean by political science What we study in political science Why do we study political science
Power
= Ability to influence the behaviour of others
Differentiate between power and authority Power sharing is a practice in conflict resolution in which different social groups share political, economical , military powers among themselves according to a agreed rule These groups can be 1 . Ethnic groups 2. Levels of govt. 3. Organs of govt 4. Social groups 5. Political parties Forms of power sharing - Horizontal: Among organs of government (e.g., legislature, executive, judiciary).e.g. india - Vertical: Among different levels of government (e.g., union, state, local).e.g. USA - Social Groups: Among religious or linguistic groups (e.g., Belgium’s community government). - Political Parties: Shared among parties, pressure groups, and movements. Terms you need to know Majoritarian: It is a belief that the majority community should be able to rule a country in whichever way it wants. Community Government: A type of Government which is elected by people belonging to one language community is called community government. Prudential: It involves decision making based on prudence, or on a careful calculation of gains and losses. Checks and Balances: In this system, each organ of the government checks the others which results in a balance of power among various institutions Reserved Constituencies: In this, the constituencies are reserved in the Assemblies and the Parliament for minorities in order to give them a fair share in powers. Coalition government: When the alliance of two or more parties gets elected and forms a government it is known as the Coalition Government. Why to study power sharing In today’s word of diversity What If we share power? = effects What If we don’t share power ?= effects Case study of Belgium Belgium is a European country with a population of a little over one crore. ∆ In this country, the ethnic composition is complex. ∆. Of the total population, 59 percent lives in the Flemish region and speaks the Dutch language. ∆> Another 40 percent people live in the Wallonia region and speak French. ∆. Remaining one percent of the Belgians speak German.
∆. In the capital city, Brussels, 80
percent people speak French while 20 percent are Dutch speaking. ∆. The French-speaking minority community was relatively rich and powerful. ∆. This made the Dutch-speaking community angry. ∆. From the 1950s to 1960s, there were tensions between the two communities because of these differences. Solution From 1970 to 1993, the constitution of Belgian was amended 4 times = To workout an arrangement to avoid conflict = Key components of the Belgian model are: 1. Central govt . : equal no. Of ministers of Dutch and French, no single community can take decision 2. State government: many powers of central government were given to state governments and were not subordinated to central government 3. Brussels: separate govt was made at capital city with equal no. Of representatives 4. Community government: elected by the people of definite linguistic community, irrespective of where the live ….. +. To make laws on cultural, education and language issues Majoritarianism in srilanka . Or Ethnic conflict in srilanka 1. Sri Lankan Tamils (13%) – Tamil locals of the country 2. Indian Tamils (5%) – 3. Sinhala’s 74% 3. Sinhala-talking individuals are for the most part Buddhists while the Tamil- talking individuals were either Hindus or Muslims. 4. There were even 7% Christians, who are both Tamil and Sinhala. Areas of conflict = Sinhala’s sought to secure dominance over govt. By virtue of their majority 1. In 1956 Sinhala only act was passed 2. Preferential policies for Sinhala applicants for higher education and govt jobs 3. In 1972 Buddhism was declared as state religion Impact Tamils felt alienated = threat to their language , culture and religion. Response →. Srilankan Tamils launched political parties and demanded 1. Recognition of Tamil as an official language 2. Regional autonomy 3. Equality of opportunity in education and govt jobs → there demand was turned down 😆 in 1980 LTTE was formed demanded independent Tamil Elam ( north and eastern parts of srilanka ) → turned in to a widespread conflict…… civil war 😴 Prabhakaran chief of LTTE was arrested in 2009 Why power sharing is desirable Two reasons 1. Prudential: involving and showing care ≈ it reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups ≈ political stability ≈it states that power sharing will bring out better outcome 2. Moral : concerns with the principal of right and wrong behaviour ∞ power sharing is the spirit of democracy ∞ people have right to consult how they are to be governed Thanku Case Study: Belgium