Scribd
Upload
5 views5 pages

Q1_Performance TAsk Details

The document outlines two performance activities focused on Philippine poetry: a Poetry Analysis Presentation and a Multimodal Poetry Anthology. Students will analyze a selected Philippine poem and present their findings, while also collaborating to create a digital anthology of original poems that reflect local and national identity, incorporating multimodal elements. Each activity includes a detailed rubric for assessment based on criteria such as depth of analysis, clarity, engagement, and creativity.

Uploaded by

jennifer panelo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views5 pages

Q1_Performance TAsk Details

The document outlines two performance activities focused on Philippine poetry: a Poetry Analysis Presentation and a Multimodal Poetry Anthology. Students will analyze a selected Philippine poem and present their findings, while also collaborating to create a digital anthology of original poems that reflect local and national identity, incorporating multimodal elements. Each activity includes a detailed rubric for assessment based on criteria such as depth of analysis, clarity, engagement, and creativity.

Uploaded by

jennifer panelo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Performance Activity

**Activity Title: Poetry Analysis Presentation**

**Description:**
Students will select a Philippine poem (lyric, narrative, or dramatic) and conduct a
thorough analysis focusing on its style, form, and features. They will evaluate the
poem for clarity of meaning, purpose, and target audience.

**Steps:**
1. **Selection:** Choose a Philippine poem.
2. **Analysis:** Break down the poem’s elements (e.g., imagery, tone, structure).
3. **Evaluation:** Discuss the poem's effectiveness in conveying its message and
engaging its audience.
4. **Presentation:** Create a visual presentation (e.g., slides, posters) and present
findings to the class, highlighting how the poem reflects local or national identity.

### GRASPS Framework

**Goal:**
Analyze and present a Philippine poem to demonstrate your understanding of its
style, form, and features, while evaluating its clarity of meaning, purpose, and
target audience.

**Role:**
You are a literary analyst and presenter tasked with exploring and conveying the
significance of a selected Philippine poem to your classmates.

**Audience:**
Your audience consists of your classmates and teacher, who will engage with your
analysis and gain insights into the poem’s themes and cultural relevance.

**Situation:**
As part of your exploration of Philippine literature, you will delve into a specific
poem, analyzing its elements to understand how it communicates its message and
connects with its audience. This activity aims to deepen your appreciation for poetry
and its role in reflecting cultural identity.

**Product:**
The final product will be a visual presentation (e.g., slides, posters) that includes:
- A detailed analysis of the chosen poem’s style, form, and features
- An evaluation of the poem’s effectiveness in conveying its message
- Insights on how the poem reflects local or national identity

**Standards:**
Here’s a detailed rubric for the "Poetry Analysis Presentation" performance activity:

### Poetry Analysis Presentation Rubric

| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Good (3)


| Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
Points |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------
----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------
---------|--------|
| **Depth of Analysis** | Thorough analysis of the poem's style, form, and
features; insightful connections made to themes and cultural context. | Good
analysis with most elements covered; some connections to themes and cultural
context. | Basic analysis; some elements discussed but lacks depth; few connections
to themes. | Minimal analysis; lacks understanding of poem's elements; no
connections made. | /4 |
| **Clarity of Evaluation** | Clear and articulate evaluation of the poem’s meaning,
purpose, and target audience; well-structured argument. | Mostly clear evaluation;
some points well-articulated; structure is mostly logical. | Evaluation is unclear in
places; lacks structure; points are not fully articulated. | Unclear evaluation; poorly
structured; fails to articulate main points. | /4 |
| **Engagement in Presentation** | Highly engaging presentation; uses effective
visuals and delivery techniques to captivate the audience. | Engaging presentation;
uses visuals and delivery techniques effectively, though some areas could improve.
| Some engagement; visuals are present but may not enhance understanding;
delivery lacks confidence. | Little to no engagement; visuals are ineffective or
absent; delivery is unclear or monotonous. | /4 |
| **Connection to Local/National Identity** | Strong connections made between the
poem and local/national identity; insightful reflections on cultural significance. |
Good connections made; some reflections on cultural significance, though may lack
depth. | Limited connections; reflections on cultural significance are minimal or
unclear. | No connections made; fails to reflect on cultural significance. | /4 |
| **Visual Presentation Quality** | Visually appealing and well-organized; enhances
understanding of the analysis; professional quality. | Generally organized and
visually appealing; supports understanding of the analysis. | Some organization but
lacks visual appeal; does not significantly support understanding. | Poorly organized
and visually unappealing; detracts from understanding of the analysis. | /4 |

### Total Points: /20

### Grading Scale:


- **Excellent (16-20 points):** Exceptional understanding and presentation of the
poem; demonstrates high levels of analysis and engagement.
- **Good (11-15 points):** Solid understanding and presentation; meets most
expectations but has areas for improvement.
- **Satisfactory (6-10 points):** Basic understanding; presentation meets minimum
requirements but lacks depth and engagement.
- **Needs Improvement (1-5 points):** Limited understanding; presentation fails to
meet expectations and lacks clarity and engagement.

This rubric provides clear criteria and expectations for students, helping them
understand how their work will be assessed.

### Project-Based Activity


**Activity Title: Create a Multimodal Poetry Anthology**

**Description:**
Students will collaborate to create a digital anthology of original poems that reflect
their local and national identity. Each student will write a poem and include
accompanying multimodal elements (images, audio, video) to enhance the literary
experience.

**Steps:**
1. **Research:** Explore themes related to local and national identity in Philippine
culture.
2. **Composition:** Write an original poem that reflects personal or community
experiences.
3. **Multimodal Integration:** Create visual or audio elements (e.g., illustrations,
recordings of readings) that complement the poem.
4. **Compilation:** Collaborate to compile individual poems into a digital anthology
using a platform like Google Sites or Canva.
5. **Publication:** Publish the anthology online and share it with the school
community.

**Assessment Criteria:**
- Originality and creativity of poems
- Quality of multimodal elements
- Cohesion of the anthology as a whole
- Reflection of local/national identity in content
Here’s a GRASPS framework for the "Create a Multimodal Poetry Anthology" project-
based activity:

### GRASPS Framework

**Goal:**
Collaborate to create a digital anthology of original poems that reflect local and
national identity, showcasing your understanding of Philippine culture and literature
through multimodal elements.

**Role:**
You are a poet and multimedia creator working with your classmates to produce a
cohesive and meaningful anthology that represents your collective experiences and
identities.

**Audience:**
The audience for your anthology includes your classmates, teachers, and the
broader school community, who will engage with and appreciate your creative
expressions.

**Situation:**
In recognition of the rich tapestry of Philippine culture and identity, your class has
been tasked with celebrating these themes through poetry. You will research, write,
and integrate multimodal elements to enhance your poems, culminating in a digital
anthology that showcases your work.

**Product:**
The final product will be a digital anthology that includes:
- An original poem from each student reflecting personal or community experiences
- Accompanying multimodal elements (images, audio recordings, videos) that
enhance the literary experience
- A cohesive layout and design that presents the poems in an engaging manner
using a platform like Google Sites or Canva

**Standards:**
Here’s a detailed rubric for the "Create a Multimodal Poetry Anthology" project-
based activity:

### Multimodal Poetry Anthology Rubric


| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Good (3)
| Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
Points |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------
----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------
---------------|--------|
| ** ** | | | | | /4 |
| ** ** |, |. | | | /4 |
| ** ** | | | | | /4 |
| ** ** | | | | | /4 |
| ** ** | | | | | /4 |

### Total Points: /20

### Grading Scale:


- **Outstanding (16-20 points):** Exceptional understanding and presentation of the
poems; demonstrates high levels of creativity, cohesion, and cultural reflection.
- **Very Satisfactory (11-15 points):** Solid understanding and presentation; meets
most expectations but has areas for improvement in creativity or cohesion.
- **Satisfactory (6-10 points):** Basic understanding; anthology meets minimum
requirements but lacks depth and engagement.
- **Needs Improvement (1-5 points):** Limited understanding; anthology fails to
meet expectations and lacks clarity, creativity, and cohesion.

This rubric provides clear criteria and expectations for students, helping them
understand how their work will be assessed in the multimodal poetry anthology
project.

You might also like