Scribd
Upload
8 views3 pages

DO_s2021_044

The document is a Study Protocol Assessment Form for a research project titled 'Exploring Teachers Experiences in Handling Learners with Intellectual Disabilities in the classroom' at Western Mindanao State University. It includes a series of guide questions for reviewers to assess the study's social value, research design, participant privacy, and risk mitigation measures. The form concludes with a section for recommendations regarding the approval status of the study.

Uploaded by

Elter kaye Cabaral
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views3 pages

DO_s2021_044

The document is a Study Protocol Assessment Form for a research project titled 'Exploring Teachers Experiences in Handling Learners with Intellectual Disabilities in the classroom' at Western Mindanao State University. It includes a series of guide questions for reviewers to assess the study's social value, research design, participant privacy, and risk mitigation measures. The form concludes with a section for recommendations regarding the approval status of the study.

Uploaded by

Elter kaye Cabaral
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Western Mindanao State University

Research Extension Services and External Linkage


RESEARCH ETHICS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
Zamboanga City, 7000, Philippines
[email protected] WMSU-REOC-FR-004.01
Effective Date: 05-Aug-2024

STUDY PROTOCOL ASSESSMENT FORM

Study Protocol Title* Exploring Teachers Experiences in Handling Learners with Intellectual Disabilities in the classroom

WMSU REOC Code Type of Review ☐Expedited ☐Full


Cabaral, Elter kaye A.
Delos Reyes, Sara Jin
Researcher* ERP ☐Chair ☐Member
Desamito, Vincent D.

Name of Adviser* Marilyn Dioso Institution*


Name of Reviewer Date Received
Page & Line
Guide questions for reviewing the proposal / protocol Number*
Does the study have social value? ☐Unable to Assess ☐ Yes ☐No
Comment: (e.g. relevance to national /community needs)

Is the study background adequate? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No


Comment:

Are the research questions supported by the Review of Literature? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Are the study objectives Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Time-bound?
Comment:

Does the research need to be carried out with human participants? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Is the research design appropriate?


● Is the population identified and defined? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Page | 1
● Is the selection of study participants described? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

● Is the sample size justified? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No


Comment:

● Is the plan for data analysis described? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

● Are there dummy tables? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No


Comment:

Is the research tool appropriate for the study? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
(survey questionnaire, interview questions)
Comment:

Are there measures to protect privacy of participants ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
and confidentiality of data?
Comment:

Does the study have a vulnerability issue? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Are appropriate mechanisms/interventions in place ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No


to address the vulnerability issue/s?
Comment:

Are there risks/ probable harms to the human participants in the study? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Are there measures to mitigate the risks? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Page | 2
Is the informed consent procedure / form adequate ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
and culturally appropriate?
Comment:

Is/are the investigator/s and adviser/s adequately trained and do ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
they have sufficient experience to undertake the study?
Comment:

Is there a disclosure of conflict of interest? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No


Comment:

Are the research facilities adequate? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No


Comment:

Are there any other concerns in the study? ☐Unable to Assess ☐Yes ☐No
Comment:

Recommendation: ☐ Approved
☐ Minor revision/s required
__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

☐ Major revision/s required


__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

☐ Disapproved
Reasons for disapproval:
__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

______________________________________ _____________________
Name and Signature of Primary Reviewer Review Date

Page | 3

You might also like