PDF (Ebook) Machine Learning Pocket Reference: Working with Structured Data in Python by Matt Harrison ISBN 9781492047544, 1492047546 download
PDF (Ebook) Machine Learning Pocket Reference: Working with Structured Data in Python by Matt Harrison ISBN 9781492047544, 1492047546 download
com
https://ebooknice.com/product/machine-learning-pocket-
reference-working-with-structured-data-in-python-11877114
DOWLOAD EBOOK
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
https://ebooknice.com/product/machine-learning-with-lightgbm-and-
python-55462132
ebooknice.com
Matt Harrison
Machine Learning
Pocket Reference
Working with Structured Data
in Python
Matt Harrison
Machine Learning Pocket Reference
by Matt Harrison
Copyright © 2019 Matt Harrison. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North,
Sebastopol, CA 95472.
O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promo‐
tional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (http://oreilly.com).
For more information, contact our corporate/institutional sales department:
800-998-9938 or [email protected].
978-1-492-04754-4
[LSI]
Table of Contents
Preface ix
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
Libraries Used 2
Installation with Pip 5
Installation with Conda 6
iii
Impute Data 25
Normalize Data 27
Refactor 27
Baseline Model 29
Various Families 29
Stacking 31
Create Model 32
Evaluate Model 33
Optimize Model 34
Confusion Matrix 35
ROC Curve 36
Learning Curve 38
Deploy Model 39
Chapter 6: Exploring 55
Data Size 55
Summary Stats 56
Histogram 58
Scatter Plot 59
Joint Plot 60
iv | Table of Contents
Pair Grid 63
Box and Violin Plots 64
Comparing Two Ordinal Values 65
Correlation 67
RadViz 71
Parallel Coordinates 73
Table of Contents | v
Penalize Models 100
Upsampling Minority 100
Generate Minority Data 101
Downsampling Majority 101
Upsampling Then Downsampling 103
vi | Table of Contents
Precision-Recall Curve 167
Cumulative Gains Plot 169
Lift Curve 171
Class Balance 172
Class Prediction Error 173
Discrimination Threshold 175
Index 295
Machine learning and data science are very popular right now
and are fast-moving targets. I have worked with Python and
data for most of my career and wanted to have a physical book
that could provide a reference for the common methods that I
have been using in industry and teaching during workshops to
solve structured machine learning problems.
This book is what I believe is the best collection of resources
and examples for attacking a predictive modeling task if you
have structured data. There are many libraries that perform a
portion of the tasks required and I have tried to incorporate
those that I have found useful as I have applied these techni‐
ques in consulting or industry work.
Many may lament the lack of deep learning techniques. Those
could be a book by themselves. I also prefer simpler techniques
and others in industry seem to agree. Deep learning for
unstructured data (video, audio, images), and powerful tools
like XGBoost for structured data.
I hope this book serves as a useful reference for you to solve
pressing problems.
ix
What to Expect
This book gives in-depth examples of solving common struc‐
tured data problems. It walks through various libraries and
models, their trade-offs, how to tune them, and how to inter‐
pret them.
The code snippets are meant to be sized such that you can use
and adapt them in your own projects.
x | Preface
TIP
This element signifies a tip or suggestion.
NOTE
This element signifies a general note.
WARNING
This element indicates a warning or caution.
Preface | xi
If you feel your use of code examples falls outside fair use or
the permission given above, feel free to contact us at
[email protected].
How to Contact Us
Please address comments and questions concerning this book
to the publisher:
We have a web page for this book, where we list errata, exam‐
ples, and any additional information. You can access this page
at http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9781492047544.
To comment or ask technical questions about this book, send
email to [email protected].
xii | Preface
For more information about our books, courses, conferences,
and news, see our website at http://www.oreilly.com.
Find us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/oreilly
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/oreillymedia
Watch us on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/oreillymedia
Acknowledgments
Much thanks to my wife and family for their support. I’m
grateful to the Python community for providing a wonderful
language and toolset to work with. Nicole Tache has been
lovely to work with and provided excellent feedback. My tech‐
nical reviewers, Mikio Braun, Natalino Busa, and Justin Fran‐
cis, kept me honest. Thanks!
Preface | xiii
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
1
Libraries Used
This book uses many libraries. This can be a good thing and a
bad thing. Some of these libraries may be hard to install or con‐
flict with other library versions. Do not feel like you need to
install all of these libraries. Use “JIT installation” and only
install the libraries that you want to use as you need them.
>>> import autosklearn, catboost,
category_encoders, dtreeviz, eli5, fancyimpute,
fastai, featuretools, glmnet_py, graphviz,
hdbscan, imblearn, janitor, lime, matplotlib,
missingno, mlxtend, numpy, pandas, pdpbox, phate,
pydotplus, rfpimp, scikitplot, scipy, seaborn,
shap, sklearn, statsmodels, tpot, treeinterpreter,
umap, xgbfir, xgboost, yellowbrick
2 | Chapter 1: Introduction
... pydotplus,
... rfpimp,
... scikitplot,
... scipy,
... seaborn,
... shap,
... sklearn,
... statsmodels,
... tpot,
... treeinterpreter,
... umap,
... xgbfir,
... xgboost,
... yellowbrick,
... ]:
... try:
... print(lib.__name__, lib.__version__)
... except:
... print("Missing", lib.__name__)
catboost 0.11.1
category_encoders 2.0.0
Missing dtreeviz
eli5 0.8.2
fancyimpute 0.4.2
fastai 1.0.28
featuretools 0.4.0
Missing glmnet_py
graphviz 0.10.1
hdbscan 0.8.22
imblearn 0.4.3
janitor 0.16.6
Missing lime
matplotlib 2.2.3
missingno 0.4.1
mlxtend 0.14.0
numpy 1.15.2
pandas 0.23.4
Missing pandas_profiling
pdpbox 0.2.0
phate 0.4.2
Libraries Used | 3
Missing pydotplus
rfpimp
scikitplot 0.3.7
scipy 1.1.0
seaborn 0.9.0
shap 0.25.2
sklearn 0.21.1
statsmodels 0.9.0
tpot 0.9.5
treeinterpreter 0.1.0
umap 0.3.8
xgboost 0.81
yellowbrick 0.9
NOTE
Most of these libraries are easily installed with pip or
conda. With fastai I need to use pip install
--no-deps fastai. The umap library is installed with pip
install umap-learn. The janitor library is installed
with pip install pyjanitor. The autosklearn library is
installed with pip install auto-sklearn.
I usually use Jupyter for doing an analysis. You can use
other notebook tools as well. Note that some, like Google
Colab, have preinstalled many of the libraries (though they
may be outdated versions).
4 | Chapter 1: Introduction
Installation with Pip
Before using pip, we will create a sandbox environment to
install our libraries into. This is called a virtual environment
named env:
$ python -m venv env
NOTE
On Macintosh and Linux, use python; on Windows, use
python3. If Windows doesn’t recognize that from the com‐
mand prompt, you may need to reinstall or fix your install
and make sure you check the “Add Python to my PATH”
checkbox.
6 | Chapter 1: Introduction
To create a file with the package requirements in it, run:
(env) $ conda env export > environment.yml
To install these requirements in a new environment, run:
(other_env) $ conda create -f environment.yml
WARNING
Some of the libraries mentioned in this book are not avail‐
able to install from Anaconda’s repository. Don’t fret. It
turns out you can use pip inside of a conda environment
(no need to create a new virtual environment), and install
these using pip.
• Business understanding
• Data understanding
• Data preparation
• Modeling
• Evaluation
• Deployment
9
Figure 2-1. Common workflow for machine learning.
11
Imports
This example is based mostly on pandas, scikit-learn, and Yel‐
lowbrick. The pandas library gives us tooling for easy data
munging. The scikit-learn library has great predictive model‐
ing, and Yellowbrick is a visualization library for evaluating
models:
>>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> from sklearn import (
... ensemble,
... preprocessing,
... tree,
... )
>>> from sklearn.metrics import (
... auc,
... confusion_matrix,
... roc_auc_score,
... roc_curve,
... )
>>> from sklearn.model_selection import (
... train_test_split,
... StratifiedKFold,
... )
>>> from yellowbrick.classifier import (
... ConfusionMatrix,
... ROCAUC,
... )
>>> from yellowbrick.model_selection import (
... LearningCurve,
... )
Ask a Question
In this example, we want to create a predictive model to answer
a question. It will classify whether an individual survives the
Titanic ship catastrophe based on individual and trip charac‐
teristics. This is a toy example, but it serves as a pedagogical
tool for showing many steps of modeling. Our model should be
able to take passenger information and predict whether that
passenger would survive on the Titanic.
This is a classification question, as we are predicting a label for
survival; either they survived or they died.
Ask a Question | 13
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
Aquilla Rose stands proudly with his mowing machine
outside his home near Eagle Creek. He didn’t stand
that still when revenuers came around.
National Park Service
All the wonders of the Great Smoky Mountains—the nature, the
people, the stories, and the battles and the jests—affected Horace
Kephart mightily. This man whose own life had been “saved” by the
Smokies began to think in terms of repaying this mountain area in
kind. For during his years on Hazel Creek and Deep Creek and in
Bryson City, he saw the results of the “loggers’ steel,” results that
caused him to lament in a single phrase, “slash, crash, go the
devastating forces.” In 1923 he summarized his feelings about the
lumber industry:
“When I first came into the Smokies the whole region was one
superb forest primeval. I lived for several years in the heart of it. My
sylvan studio spread over mountain after mountain, seemingly
without end, and it was always clean and fragrant, always vital,
growing new shapes of beauty from day to day. The vast trees met
overhead like cathedral roofs.... Not long ago I went to that same
place again. It was wrecked, ruined, desecrated, turned into a
thousand rubbish heaps, utterly vile and mean.”
Kephart began to think in terms of a national park. He and a
Japanese photographer friend, George Masa, trekked the Smokies
and gathered concrete experience and evidence of the mountains’
wild splendor. At every opportunity, Kephart advocated the park idea
in newspapers, in brochures, and by word of mouth. He proudly
acknowledged that “I owe my life to these mountains and I want
them preserved that others may profit by them as I have.”
The concept of a national park for these southern mountains was not
a new one in 1920. Forty years earlier, a retired minister and former
state geologist, Drayton Smith, of Franklin, North Carolina, had
proposed “a national park in the mountains.” In 1885, Dr. Henry O.
Marcy of Boston, Massachusetts, had discussed future health
resorts in America and had considered “the advisability of securing
under state control a
large reservation of
the higher range as
a park.” By the turn
of the century, the
Appalachian
National Park
Association was
formed in Asheville,
North Carolina, and
publicized the idea
of a national park
somewhere in the
region, not
specifically the Great
Smokies. When the
Federal Government
seemed to rule out
this possibility, the
Association devoted
the bulk of its time
and effort to the
creation of national
forest reserves.
But people like
Horace Kephart
knew the difference
between a national
Edouard E. Exline park that
safeguarded trees
When the Civilian Conservation and a national forest
Corps moved into the Smokies in that allowed logging.
the 1930s, young men from the In 1923, a group
cities saw moonshine stills supporting a genuine
firsthand. Here one pretends to be a Great Smokies park
moonshiner and hangs his head formed in Knoxville,
low for the photographer. Tennessee. Mr. and
Mrs. Willis P. Davis,
of the Knoxville Iron Company, in the summer of that year had
enjoyed a trip to some of the country’s western parks. As they
viewed the wonders preserved therein, Mrs. Davis was reminded of
the natural magnificence near her own home. “Why can’t we have a
national park in the Great Smokies?” she asked her husband.
Back in Knoxville, Mr. Davis began to ask that question of friends
and associates. One of these was Col. David C. Chapman, a
wholesale druggist, who listened but did not heed right away:
Grace Newman sits enraptured as Jim Proffit plays the
guitar.
Burton Wolcott
“Not until I accidentally saw a copy of President Theodore
Roosevelt’s report on the Southern Appalachians did I have any idea
of just what we have here. In reading and rereading this report I
learned for the first time that the Great Smokies have some truly
superlative qualities. After that I became keenly interested in Mr.
Davis’ plan and realized that a national park should be a possibility.”
The Davises and Chapman led the formation of the Great Smoky
Mountains Conservation Association. Congressmen and Secretary
of the Interior Hubert Work were contacted. Work endorsed the
project, and two years later Congress passed an act authorizing
associations in Tennessee and North Carolina to buy lands and deed
them to the U.S. Government.
Problems immediately presented themselves. The citizens would
have to buy this park. Unlike Yellowstone and other previous land
grants from the Federal Government, the Smokies were owned by
many private interests and therefore presented a giant challenge to
hopeful fund raisers. To further complicate matters, no group had the
power to condemn lands; any property, if secured at all, would have
to be coaxed from its owner at an appropriately high price. Finally,
and most discouragingly, park enthusiasts faced an area of more
than 6,600 separate tracts and thousands of landowners.
Yet events conspired to give the park movement a sustaining drive.
The lumber companies had made the people of the Smokies more
dependent on money for additional food, modern-day clothing, and
new forms of recreation. World War I and the coming of the
highways had instilled a restlessness in the mountain people, a
yearning for new sights and different ways of living. Some began to
echo the sentiments of one farmer who, after realizing meager
returns for his hard labor on rocky fields, looked around him and
concluded, “Well, I reckon a park is about all this land is fit for.”
Determined leadership overcame obstacles large and small. Behind
Chapman’s professorial appearance—his wire-rimmed glasses and
three-piece suits and unkempt hair—was a man who had been a
colonel in World War I, a man who had resolved to make the dream
of a national park into a reality. Along with Chapman as the driving
force, associate director of the National Park Service Arno B.
Cammerer provided the steering and the gears. Cammerer’s marked
enthusiasm for incorporating the Great Smokies into the national
park system added a well-placed, influential spokesman to the
movement. By spring of 1926, groups in North Carolina and
Tennessee had raised more than a million dollars. Within another
year, the legislatures of the two states each had donated twice that
amount.
With $5 million as a nest egg, park advocates turned to the actual
buying of lands. Cammerer himself defined a boundary which
included the most suitable territory and which, as it turned out,
conformed closely to the final boundary. Chapman and his
associates approached individual homeowners. Sometimes they
received greetings similar to one on a homemade sign:
“Col. Chapman. You and Hoast are notify. Let the Cove People
Alone. Get Out. Get Gone. 40 m. Limit.”
The older mountain people clung desperately to what they had. Even
though the buyers were prepared to issue lifetime leases for those
who wanted to stay, they found it difficult to remove this resolute
band from their homeland.
Many of the Smokies’ residents—the younger, more mobile, more
financially oriented ones—accepted the coming of the park with a
combination of fatalism and cautious hope. Gradually they
acknowledged the fact that a park and its tourist trade might be a
continuing asset, whereas the prosperity from logging had proved at
best only temporary. After John D. Rockefeller, Jr., through the Laura
Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund, doubled the park fund with a
much-needed gift of an additional $5 million, renewed offers of cash
completely melted many icy objections.
The lumber companies followed suit, but for higher stakes.
Champion Fibre, Little River, Suncrest, Norwood, and Ritter were
among the 18 timber and pulpwood companies that owned more
than 85 percent of the proposed park area. They fought to stay for
obvious economic reasons, yet they were prepared to leave if the
price was right. Little River Lumber Company, after considerable
negotiation with the state of Tennessee and the city of Knoxville, sold
its 30,345 hectares (75,000 acres) for only $8.80 per hectare ($3.57
per acre).
George A. Grant
An early morning fog cloaks the dense vegetation and
rolling hills at Cove Creek Gap. Such scenes inspired
many people to rally around the idea of purchasing
land for a park.
National Park Service
Those attending a meeting March 6, 1928, when a $5
million gift from the Laura Spelman Rockefeller
Memorial was announced, included (front from left)
former Tennessee Gov. Ben W. Hooper, Willis P. Davis,
E. E. Conner, David C. Chapman, Gov. Henry H.
Horton, John Nolan, Knoxville Mayor James A. Fowler,
(back from left) Kenneth Chorley, Arno B. Cammerer,
Wiley Brownlee, J. M. Clark, Margaret Preston, Ben A.
Morton, Frank Maloney, Cary Spence, and Russell
Hanlon.
The vast holdings of Champion Fibre Company were at the very
heart of the park, however, and the results of the company’s
resistance to a national park were central to success or failure of the
whole movement. Champion’s 36,400 hectares (90,000 acres)
included upper Greenbrier, Mt. Guyot, Mt. LeConte, the Chimneys,
and a side of Clingmans Dome, crowned by extensive forests of
virgin spruce. This splendid domain was the cause of hot tempers,
torrid accusations, rigid defenses, and a hard-fought condemnation
lawsuit. In the end, however, on March 30, 1931, Champion Fibre
agreed to sell for a total of $3 million, a sum which took on added
appeal during the slump of the disastrous Depression.
Four days after this agreement, Horace Kephart died in an
automobile accident near Cherokee, North Carolina. An 8-ton
boulder was later brought from the hills above Smokemont to mark
his grave in Bryson City.
Only a few years earlier Kephart had said:
“Here to-day is the last stand of primeval American forest at its best.
If saved—and if saved at all it must be done at once—it will be a joy
and a wonder to our people for all time. The nation is summoned by
a solemn duty to preserve it.”
And it was, indeed, preserved. The Federal Government in 1933
contributed a final $2 million to the cause, establishing the figure of
$12 million as the grand total of money raised for the park. On
September 2, 1940, with land acquisition almost completed,
President Franklin D. Roosevelt dedicated the Great Smoky
Mountains National Park “for the permanent enjoyment of the
people.”
The park movement’s greatest victory, coming as it did at Kephart’s
death, lent a special significance to his life. For his experience
symbolized the good effects that a national park in the Great Smoky
Mountains could create. These mountains and their people inspired
him to write eloquently of their truth and endurance; his own health
seemed to thrive in the rugged, elemental environment of the
Smokies. Perhaps most important of all, he discovered here the
impact of what it can mean to know a real home. Having found a
home for himself, he labored tirelessly for a national park to give to
his fellow countrymen the same opportunity for wonder and renewal
and growth.
John Walker, the patriarch of a large self-reliant family,
admires cherries he raised at his home in Little
Greenbrier.
Jim Shelton
The Past Becomes Present
As early as 1930, citizens and officials across the United States had
begun to realize that a new additional park would indeed encompass
and preserve the Great Smoky Mountains. Hard-working Maj. J.
Ross Eakin, the first superintendent of the park, arrived at the
beginning of the next year from his previous post in Montana’s
Glacier National Park and was quickly introduced to the cold, mid-
January winds of the Great Smokies and some of the controversies
that had arisen during establishment of the park.
At first, Eakin and his few assistants limited their duties to the basics;
they marked boundaries, prevented hunting, fought and forestalled
fire. But as the months passed, as the park grew in size and its staff
increased in number, minds and muscles alike tackled the real
problem of shaping a sanctuary which all the people of present and
future generations could enjoy.
Help came from an unexpected quarter. The economic depression
that had gripped the country in 1930 tightened its stranglehold as the
decade progressed. In the famous “Hundred Days” spring of 1933, a
special session of Congress passed the first and most sweeping
series of President Roosevelt’s New Deal legislation. The Civilian
Conservation Corps, created in April, established work for more than
two million young men. CCC camps, paying $30 a month for work in
conservation, flood control, and wilderness projects, sprang up.
As far as the young, struggling Great Smoky Mountains National
Park was concerned, this new CCC program could not have come at
a better time. Through the Corps, much-needed manpower
converged by the hundreds on the Smokies from such places as
New Jersey, Ohio, and New York City. Supervised by Park Service
officials and reserve officers from the U.S. Army, college-age men
first set up their own camps—17 in all—and then went about that old
familiar labor in the Smokies, landscaping and building roads. In
addition, they constructed trails, shelters, powerlines, fire towers,
and bridges.
Some of their tent-strewn camps were pitched on old logging sites
with familiar names like Smokemont and Big Creek. Others, such as
Camp No. 413 on Forney Creek, were more remote but no less
adequate. Ingenuity, sparked by necessity, created accommodations
which made full use of all available resources. At Camp Forney, for
instance, there was a barracks, a messhall, a bathhouse, and an
officers’ quarters. Water from clear, cold Forney Creek was piped
into the kitchen; food was stored in a homemade ice chest. The
residents of the camp, seeing no reason why they should rough it
more than necessary, added a library, a post office, and a
commissary in their spare time.
The CCC men, their ages between 18 and 25, did not forget
recreation. As teams organized for football, baseball, boxing,
wrestling, and soccer, the hills resounded with unfamiliar calls of
scores and umpires’ decisions, while the more familiar tussles of
boxing and wrestling raised echoes of old partisan matches
throughout the hills. At times, these young workers answered the
urge to ramble, too. One of them later recalled his days as a radio
man on the top of Mt. Sterling:
“It was seven miles steep up there, and sometimes I’d jog down
about sundown and catch a truck for Newport. That’s where we went
to be with people. The last truck brought us back after midnight.”
A minor problem sometimes arose when the CCC “outsiders” began
dating local girls; farming fathers sometimes set fires to give the
boys something else to do during the weekends. The conflict of
cultures was thrown into a particularly sharp light when a Corps
participant shot a farmer’s hog one night and shouted that he had
killed a bear!
On the whole, however, the Civilian Conservation Corps program in
the Great Smoky Mountains was a major success. In one or two
extremely rugged areas of the park, retired loggers were hired in 10-
day shifts to hack out or even drill short trail lengths. The rest of the
965-kilometer (600-mile) trail system, together with half a dozen fire
towers and almost 480 kilometers (300 miles) of fire roads and
tourist highways, was the product of the CCC. When Superintendent
Eakin evaluated the work of only the first two years of the CCC’s
operation, he equated it with a decade of normal accomplishment.
Through these and similar efforts, which included almost 110
kilometers (70 miles) of the famous Appalachian Trail, the natural
value of the Great Smoky Mountains became a recognized and
established lure for thousands, eventually millions, of visitors. But
there was another resource that remained untapped, a challenge to
the national park purpose and imagination. This resource was first
overlooked, then neglected, and finally confronted with respect. The
resource was the people and their homes.
Many previous owners of park land had received lifetime leases that
allowed them to live on in their dwellings, work their fields, and cut
dead timber even while tourists streamed through the Smokies.
Some of the lessees, such as those living near Gatlinburg, saw a
new era coming, thrusting back the street-ends until motels and
restaurants and craft shops pushed against an abandoned apple
orchard or a 10-plot cemetery or a deserted backyard laced with
lilacs. These rememberers of an earlier time relinquished their lands
in the park, more often than not resettling within sight of the
mountain range and the homeland they had just left.
Yet a few lessees, those living further up the valleys, deeper into the
mountains, or isolated from the well-traveled paths, these few folks
stayed on. The Walker sisters of Little Greenbrier Cove were
representative of this small group.
John Walker, their father, was himself the eldest of his parents’ 15
children. In 1860, at the age of 19, he became engaged to 14-year-
old Margaret Jane King. The Civil War postponed their wedding, and
John, an ardent Unionist who had enlisted in the First Tennessee
Light Artillery, spent three months in a Confederate prison and lost
45 kilograms (100 pounds) before he was exchanged and provided
with a pension. In 1866, they were finally married. After Margaret
Jane’s father died, the young couple moved into the King homestead
in Little Greenbrier.
They had eleven children: four boys,
seven girls. John remained a strong
Republican and Primitive Baptist; he
liked to boast that in a long and
fruitful lifetime he had spent a total of
50 cents on health care for his family
(two of his sons had once required
medicine for the measles). Margaret
Jane was herself an “herb doctor”
and a midwife, talents which
complemented John’s skills as a
blacksmith, carpenter, miller, farmer.
Once, as Margaret Jane was
chasing a weasel from her hens, the
reddish-brown animal bit her thumb
and held on; she calmly thrust her
hand into a full washtub, where the
weasel drowned in water stained by
her blood.
Joseph S. Hall
Columbus “Clum”
Cardwell of Hills Creek,
Tennessee, worked in
the CCC garage at
Smokemont. That
experience led to a 23-
year career as an auto-
mechanic at the
national park.
Edouard E Exline
Little Greenbrier Cove was known to some people as
Five Sisters Cove because of the Walker sisters’ place
just above the schoolhouse. The Walkers had their
garden and grape arbors close to the house for handy
tending.
Edouard E Exline
Inside, everything was neat as a pin with coats, hats,
baskets, guns, and what-have-you hanging on the
newspaper-covered walls.
Edouard E Exline
Sitting on the front porch are (from left) Polly, Louisa,
and Martha. Also on the porch is a loom made by their
father (see page 120) and a spinning wheel.
The children grew up. The three older boys married and moved
away. The youngest, Giles Daniel, left for Iowa and fought in World
War I. Sarah Caroline, the only one of the daughters ever to marry,
began her life with Jim Shelton in 1908. Hettie Rebecca worked for a
year or two in a Knoxville hosiery mill, but the Depression sent her
back home. When Nancy Melinda died in 1931, the original home
place was left in the hands of five sisters; Hettie, Margaret Jane,
Polly, Louisa Susan, and Martha Ann.
They lived the self-sufficiency of their ancestors. They stated simply
that “our land produces everything we need except sugar, soda,
coffee, and salt.” Their supplies came from the grape arbor, the
orchard, the herb and vegetable garden; the sheep, hogs, fowl, and
milch cows; the springhouse crocks of pickled beets and sauerkraut;
the dried food and the seed bags and the spice racks that hung from
nails hammered into the newspaper-covered walls of the main
house. The material aspects of their surroundings represented fully
the fabric of life as it had been known in the hundreds of abandoned
cabins and barns and outbuildings that dotted the landscape of the
Great Smoky Mountains National Park. And the Walker sisters were
not about to give up their way of life without a struggle. In a poem,
“My Mountain Home,” Louisa expressed the family’s feelings:
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com