Microsoft Excel 16.

0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Lession 4 22.1.25.xlsx]Wyndoor điểm chấm thi là đọc được cái kết quả,
Report Created: 1/22/2025 8:07:44 AM

Bảng này là thay đổi độc lập c

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$D$15 Units Produced Doors 2 0 300 450 300 Allowable range: (0;750)
$E$15 Units Produced Windows 6 0 500 1E+030 300 Allowable range: (200;infinity

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease Implication of shadow price
$F$10 Plant 1 House Used 2 0 4 1E+030 2 Profit will keep if you change
$F$11 Plant 2 House Used 12 150 12 6 6 Profit will +150 if you change
$F$12 Plant 3 House Used 18 100 18 6 6 Profit will +100 if you change

cái range á thì thuộc cái range này (allow

từ 6- 18 nè l/n nó tăng lên 1

khi hour là 18 thì door=0, w
profit nhưng góc độ dn thì
mang tính trade off, suy ngẫ
đưa ra quyết định để hài hòa

cái này implication: khi giảm h plant 3 để

m thi là đọc được cái kết quả, còn solver chỉ chạy v thôi có j đâu

Bảng này là thay đổi độc lập chỉ thể hiện số liệu cho 1 trong 2 cái thay đổi à

Allowable range: (0;750)

Allowable range: (200;infinity)

Implication of shadow price

Profit will keep if you change the plant 1 resources of hours available
Profit will +150 if you change 1 hour (the plant 2 resources of hours available)
Profit will +100 if you change 1 hour (the plant 3 resources of hours available)

á thì thuộc cái range này (allowable) thì nó mới đúng cái shadow price

từ 6- 18 nè l/n nó tăng lên 150 profit nhưng lưu ý rằng cần đánh đổi như
khi hour là 18 thì door=0, window=9 thì chỉ tập trung vào win đem lại
profit nhưng góc độ dn thì dn cần diversified, bởi tt thì cần cả 2 cái, nó
mang tính trade off, suy ngẫm rồi cân nhắc để đưa ra quết định phù hợp,
đưa ra quyết định để hài hòa các yếu tố, không chỉ đơn thuần là nhìn con
số

plication: khi giảm h plant 3 để bù qua plant 2 thì l/n giảm p2 đc bù đắp bởi p3
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Lession 4 22.1.25.xlsx]Wyndoor
Report Created: 1/22/2025 9:21:07 AM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$D$15 Units Produced Doors 1.333333333 0 300 450 300
$E$15 Units Produced Windows 7 0 500 1E+030 300

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$F$10 Plant 1 House Used 1.333333333 0 2 1E+030 0.666666667
$F$11 Plant 2 House Used 14 150 14 4 2
$F$12 Plant 3 House Used 18 100 18 2 4

After changing the available hours for Plant 1 from 4 to 2 and for Plant 2 from 12 to 14, the optimal solution and tot
affected. The shadow price for all plants remains unchanged. Specifically, The shadow price for Plant 1 remains at 0,
that increasing its available hours would not improve the total profit. On the other hand, the increase in available ho
2, which previously had a shadow price of 150, suggests a potential increase in profit, as each additional hour could
$150 to the objective function. The shadow price for Plant 3 remains at 100, meaning that each additional hour wou
$100 to the total profit. With the decrease in available hours for Plant 1 and the increase for Plant 2, the optimal pro
quantities of doors and windows may shift, potentially improving the overall profit compared to the original $3,900.
optimization of the model is required to determine the new production levels and the resulting total profit under th
constraints.
 đề này cô đổi plant 1 hour available 4->2, plant 2 là 12->14
, the optimal solution and total profit are
price for Plant 1 remains at 0, indicating
nd, the increase in available hours for Plant
as each additional hour could contribute
that each additional hour would still add
ase for Plant 2, the optimal production
mpared to the original $3,900. A re-
resulting total profit under the updated
plant 2 là 12->14
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Lession 4 22.1.25.xlsx]Wyndoor
Report Created: 1/22/2025 9:35:28 AM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$D$15 Units Produced Doors 0 0 300 450 300
$E$15 Units Produced Windows 7.5 0 500 1E+030 300

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$F$10 Plant 1 House Used 0 0 4 1E+030 4
$F$11 Plant 2 House Used 15 150 15 0 12
$F$12 Plant 3 House Used 15 100 15 12 0

đề này cô đổi plant 2 hour av

After adjusting the available hours for Plant 2 from 12 to 15 and for Plant 3 from 18 to 15 while keeping
Plant 1 fixed at 4 hours, the optimal solution and total profit have changed. The new solution shows that
only windows are produced, with 7.5 units, while doors are no longer produced. The total profit has
decreased to $3,750 compared to the previous $3,900. The shadow price for Plant 1 remains at 0,
indicating that increasing its available hours would not improve the total profit. However, for Plant 2, the
shadow price of 150 implies that further increases in available hours would positively impact profitability,
while Plant 3’s shadow price of 100 suggests that reducing its available hours would have a negative
impact on the objective function. Given the new constraints, the optimal resource allocation favors
window production over doors, and further analysis is required to explore potential improvements in
capacity utilization.
 đề này cô đổi plant 2 hour available 12->15, plant 3 là 18->15

o 15 while keeping Đi thi chỗ này vt kết luận thì nên đầu tien
solution shows that viết shadow price, sau đó r đến decision
otal profit has nhé
emains at 0,
ver, for Plant 2, the Cô nói từ phần này chở đi KL k chỉ nói
impact profitability, optimal solution đâu, cô còn nói j mà ghi
ave a negative câu trl vào ô trl đó nhé
ocation favors
mprovements in
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Lession 4 22.1.25.xlsx]5.14
Report Created: 1/22/2025 9:50:43 AM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$D$18 Number of Ads TV Spots 0 -50 1300 50 1E+030
$E$18 Number of Ads Magazine Ads 20 0 600 150 50
$F$18 Number of Ads SS Ads 10 0 500 300 33.33333333

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$G$13 Ad Budget Budget Spent 4000 3 4000 1000 1500
$G$14 Planning Budget Budget Spent 1000 5 1000 600 200
 TV Spots Magazine SS Ads
Exposures per Ad (thousands) 1,300 600 500

Budget Budget
Cost per Ad ($ thousands) Spent Available
Ad Budget 300 150 100 4,000 <= 4,000
Planning Budget 90 30 40 1,000 <= 1,000
Exposures
(thousand
TV SpotsMagazine Ads SS Ads s)
Number of Ads 0 20 10 17,000
<=
Max TV Spots 5

a The total expected number of exposures could be increase by 3000 for c

each additional $1000 added to the advertising budget

b My answer in part a would remain valid when the ad budget between d

$2500 and $5000

e Percentage of allowable increase for ad budget = 100,000/ 1000 = 10000% f

Percentage of allowable increase for planning budget = 100,000/ 600 = 16670%
The sum is 26670% > 100%, so the shadow prices may or may not be valid

g The additional $100,000 should be removed from the advertising budget, as its
shadow price is only 3 lower than that of the planning budget. In other words, each
$1,000 decrease in the advertising budget results in a reduction of 3,000 exposures,
which is lower compared to the 5,000 exposures for the planning budget.
The total expected number of exposures could be increase by 5000 for
each additional $1000 added to the planning budget

My answer in part c would remain valid when the planning budget

between $800 and $1600

The amount of $100,000 exceeds the allowable increase for both the
planning and advertising budgets. However, allocating the additional
funds to the planning budget would be more beneficial, as each $1,000
increase in the planning budget results in 5,000 additional exposures,
compared to only 3,000 additional exposures per $1,000 increase in the
advertising budget.
 Doors Windows
Unit Profit $ 300 $ 500
House Hours
Hours Used Per Unit Produced Used Available
Plant 1 1 0 0 <= 4
Plant 2 0 2 15 <= 15
Plant 3 3 2 15 <= 15

Doors Windows Total Profit

Units Prod 0 7.5 $ 3,750
 RHS: right hand-side: là cái ô

Implication: coi coi đầu tư vô nhà máy n

RHS: right hand-side: là cái ô hours available bên phải của bài Wyndoor ấy

n: coi coi đầu tư vô nhà máy nào thì nó sinh lợi đc để bt mà đầu tư